# Numerical Comparison of Prediction Models for Aerosol Filtration Efficiency Applied on a Hollow-Fiber Membrane Pore Structure

^{1}

^{2}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Prediction Models for Air Filtration Efficiency

_{down}and C

_{up}are the number of particles downstream and upstream of the filter, respectively.

#### 2.1. Efficiency Prediction of Fibrous Filters

_{f}, Z and d

_{f}are the filter solidity, SCE, filter thickness and average collector diameter, respectively. The total SCE is a sum of contributions from different collection mechanisms and can be written as follows:

_{I}, η

_{R}, η

_{D}and η

_{A}are the single collector efficiencies due to inertial impaction, interception, diffusion and adhesion, respectively. The filtration theory, which is based on three main mechanisms, inertial impaction, interception and diffusion (Figure 2), does not take into account particle-fiber interaction, i.e., the particle rebound and re-entrainment. Therefore, we used Equation (3) to calculate the SCE based on collision efficiency (sum of collection efficiencies due to impaction interception and diffusion) multiplied by the collection efficiency caused by adhesion effects [46,47].

#### 2.1.1. SCE Due to Brownian Motion

_{B}, T, µ and d

_{p}are the Boltzmann constant, absolute temperature, air dynamic viscosity and particle diameter, respectively and C

_{s}is the Cunningham slip correction factor:

_{D}). For nanoparticles that have high diffusion coefficient, hence smaller Peclet number, Wang et al. [48] gave the following relationship:

_{f}≥ 2 µm as follows:

_{1}is a constant calculated as follows:

_{2}is calculated as follows:

#### 2.1.2. SCE Due to Interception

_{f}< 1) as follows:

_{f}as fiber Reynolds number characterizing flow field around a fiber calculated as follows:

#### 2.1.3. SCE Due to Inertial Impaction

_{p}is the particle density. If the Stokes’ number is higher than unity, the particles separate from streamlines and hit the collector. On the other hand, for Stokes’ number lower than one, the inertia effect will not take place. Several formulae have been derived for SCE due to inertial impaction. The most often used relationship is that proposed by Stechkina et al. [50]:

_{f}> 10. However, as suggested by Saleh et al. [65], this equation may also be used for Re

_{f}< 2. The relationship is as follows:

_{f}< 0.25 and 0.5 < Stk < 4.1 and Re

_{f}< 1, 0.8 < Stk < 2 and R < 0.2, respectively. Zhu et al. [69] derived a relationship with no restrictions concerning Stk, Re

_{f}and α as follows:

_{f}< 60 and 1 < Stk < 20 as follows:

_{f}< 40,000 and 0.07 < Stk < 5 as follows:

#### 2.1.4. SCE Due to Adhesion

_{p}is the particle Reynolds number calculated as follows:

_{pp}is not the standard fluid dynamics Reynolds number, it uses the particle density ρ

_{p}for the calculation [73]. Equation (41) was accurate for 1 < Stk < 120 and 0.4 < Re

_{f}< 5.75.

#### 2.2. Efficiency Prediction of CPM

_{I}for Nuclepore filters can be calculated using the model proposed by Pich [74] as follows:

_{c}as the slip correction factor and calculated as follows [66]:

_{D}can be calculated as follows [75]:

_{D}< 0.01 or

_{D}> 0.01, where N

_{D}is:

_{o}is the pore diameter. The interception efficiency on pore opening η

_{R}can be calculated using the model suggested by Spurny et al. [75]:

_{o}is the interception parameter for capillary pore filters calculated as follows:

_{DS}can be calculated using the expression proposed by Manton [76]:

_{2}= 4.5 and β

_{1}and δ are coefficients that are calculated as follows:

## 3. Materials and Methods

#### Hollow-Fiber Membranes

_{f(o)}was calculated as follows:

_{f(o)i}is an individual collector (pore) size, n

_{i}is the number of collectors/pores with a given size d

_{f(o)i}and N is the number of all measured collectors/pores, i.e., number of measurements obtained from the SEM pictures. The average collector/pore size is thus a weighted average of 125 values. The weighted average pore size was calculated using pore dimensions of the elliptical shape (the major and minor axes). The largest particle able to penetrate through the membrane is mostly given by the smaller pore dimension (i.e., that of minor axe). However, due to the random motion and shape of particles, some particles larger than the minor axe length can penetrate through the membrane. Therefore, the weighted average was calculated using both axes’ dimensions, giving a larger average pore size. This step ensures that the results of the predicted efficiencies will not be overrated. The main parameters of the membrane structure and conditions for which the models were compared are shown in Table 1. For the model comparison, we also used the standard deviation of pore and collector average diameter to depict uncertainty bounds. For the sake of brevity, this was done for final results only, i.e., overall efficiency.

## 4. Results and Discussion

#### 4.1. Fibrous Filters

_{0}is the adhesion distance. Adhesion energy is directly proportional to the particle size, therefore, higher energy is necessary to keep a larger particle attached to the fiber. It is similar for face velocity, which is mostly assumed the same as the impact velocity of the particle colliding with the fiber surface. The impact velocity should be less than the critical velocity ν derived from the adhesion energy given as follows [46]:

_{e}is the main electronic absorption frequency typically around 3 × 10

^{15}s

^{−1}. The subscript notation 1, 2 and 3 of ε and n indicate the particle, membrane surface and fluid, respectively. The typical value of Hamaker constant ranges between 10

^{−19}and 10

^{−20}[83]. However, significant influence will also have particle surface charges, which can cause the membrane to act as an electret filter, so the particles may be captured due to electrostatic forces. In this work however, we focus on the mechanical means of filtration only, so this effect is not considered.

#### Overall SCE and overall Filtration Efficiency

^{−66}which is practically equaled to zero. The results shown in Figure 9a are single collector efficiencies calculated using models for diffusion (Equation (18)), interception (Equation (21)), impaction (Equation (35)) and adhesion (Equation (41)). So it is an example of one selected combination of models for individual mechanism. The other was not calculated as it was assumed that the result would be the same or would vary somewhere in the order of 10

^{−70}, which is negligible.

#### 4.2. CPM

## 5. Conclusions

## Supplementary Materials

## Funding

## Conflicts of Interest

## References

- Givehchi, R.; Tan, Z. An Overview of Airborne Nanoparticle Filtration and Thermal Rebound Theory. Aerosol Air Qual. Res.
**2014**, 14, 45–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Givehchi, R.; Tan, Z. The effect of capillary force on airborne nanoparticle filtration. J. Aerosol Sci.
**2015**, 83, 12–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Darçın, M. Association between air quality and quality of life. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.
**2014**, 21, 1954–1959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Luo, C.; Zhu, X.; Yao, C.; Hou, L.; Zhang, J.; Cao, J.; Wang, A. Short-term exposure to particulate air pollution and risk of myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.
**2015**, 22, 14651–14662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Landlová, L.; Čupr, P.; Franců, J.; Klánová, J.; Lammel, G. Composition and effects of inhalable size fractions of atmospheric aerosols in the polluted atmosphere. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.
**2014**, 21, 6188–6204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Bulejko, P.; Adamec, V.; Schüllerová, B.; Skeřil, R. Levels, sources, and health risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Brno, Czech Republic: A 5-year study. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.
**2016**, 23, 20462–20473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Jung, K.H.; Yan, B.; Chillrud, S.N.; Perera, F.P.; Whyatt, R.; Camann, D.; Kinney, P.L.; Miller, R.L. Assessment of Benzo(a)pyrene-equivalent Carcinogenicity and Mutagenicity of Residential Indoor versus Outdoor Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Exposing Young Children in New York City. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health
**2010**, 7, 1889–1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version] - Murr, L.E.; Soto, K.F.; Garza, K.M.; Guerrero, P.A.; Martinez, F.; Esquivel, E.V.; Ramirez, D.A.; Shi, Y.; Bang, J.J.; Venzor, J., 3rd. Combustion-Generated Nanoparticulates in the El Paso, TX, USA/Juarez, Mexico Metroplex: Their Comparative Characterization and Potential for Adverse Health Effects. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health
**2006**, 3, 48–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Pini, M.; Cedillo González, E.I.; Neri, P.; Siligardi, C.; Ferrari, A.M. Assessment of Environmental Performance of TiO2 Nanoparticles Coated Self-Cleaning Float Glass. Coatings
**2017**, 7, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kumar, P.; Fennell, P.; Robins, A. Comparison of the behaviour of manufactured and other airborne nanoparticles and the consequences for prioritising research and regulation activities. J. Nanopart. Res.
**2010**, 12, 1523–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version] - Shaffer, R.E.; Rengasamy, S. Respiratory protection against airborne nanoparticles: A review. J. Nanopart. Res.
**2009**, 11, 1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Vinh, N.; Kim, H.-M. Electrospinning Fabrication and Performance Evaluation of Polyacrylonitrile Nanofiber for Air Filter Applications. Appl. Sci.
**2016**, 6, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wu, C.-M.; Chou, M.-H.; Zeng, W.-Y. Piezoelectric Response of Aligned Electrospun Polyvinylidene Fluoride/Carbon Nanotube Nanofibrous Membranes. Nanomaterials
**2018**, 8, 420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Ge, J.C.; Choi, N.J. Fabrication of Functional Polyurethane/Rare Earth Nanocomposite Membranes by Electrospinning and Its VOCs Absorption Capacity from Air. Nanomaterials
**2017**, 7, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Matsumoto, H.; Tanioka, A. Functionality in Electrospun Nanofibrous Membranes Based on Fiber’s Size, Surface Area, and Molecular Orientation. Membranes
**2011**, 1, 249–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version] - Ling, T.Y.; Wang, J.; Pui, D.Y.H. Measurement of filtration efficiency of Nuclepore filters challenged with polystyrene latex nanoparticles: Experiments and modeling. J. Nanopart. Res.
**2011**, 13, 5415–5424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Chen, S.-C.; Wang, J.; Fissan, H.; Pui, D.Y.H. Use of Nuclepore filters for ambient and workplace nanoparticle exposure assessment—Spherical particles. Atmos. Environ.
**2013**, 77, 385–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Chen, S.-C.; Wang, J.; Fissan, H.; Pui, D.Y.H. Exposure assessment of nanosized engineered agglomerates and aggregates using Nuclepore filter. J. Nanopart. Res.
**2013**, 15, 1955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Homaeigohar, S.; Elbahri, M. Nanocomposite Electrospun Nanofiber Membranes for Environmental Remediation. Materials
**2014**, 7, 1017–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version] - Lin, P.-H.; Horng, R.-Y.; Hsu, S.-F.; Chen, S.-S.; Ho, C.-H. A Feasibility Study of Ammonia Recovery from Coking Wastewater by Coupled Operation of a Membrane Contactor and Membrane Distillation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health
**2018**, 15, 441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Akhondi, E.; Zamani, F.; Tng, K.H.; Leslie, G.; Krantz, W.B.; Fane, A.G.; Chew, J.W. The Performance and Fouling Control of Submerged Hollow Fiber (HF) Systems: A Review. Appl. Sci.
**2017**, 7, 765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Simone, S.; Galiano, F.; Faccini, M.; Boerrigter, M.E.; Chaumette, C.; Drioli, E.; Figoli, A. Preparation and Characterization of Polymeric-Hybrid PES/TiO2 Hollow Fiber Membranes for Potential Applications in Water Treatment. Fibers
**2017**, 5, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Aluwi Shakir, N.A.; Wong, K.Y.; Noordin, M.Y.; Sudin, I. Development of a High Performance PES Ultrafiltration Hollow Fiber Membrane for Oily Wastewater Treatment Using Response Surface Methodology. Sustainability
**2015**, 7, 16465–16482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Chong, K.C.; Lai, S.O.; Lau, W.J.; Thiam, H.S.; Ismail, A.F.; Roslan, R.A. Preparation, Characterization, and Performance Evaluation of Polysulfone Hollow Fiber Membrane with PEBAX or PDMS Coating for Oxygen Enhancement Process. Polymers
**2018**, 10, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Brozova, T.; Raudensky, M. Determination of surface wettability of polymeric hollow fibres. J. Elastom. Plast.
**2018**. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Weiß, K.; Astrouski, I.; Reppich, M.; Raudenský, M. Polymeric Hollow Fiber Bundles as Immersed Heat Exchangers. Chem. Eng. Technol.
**2018**. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bulejko, P.; Dohnal, M.; Pospíšil, J.; Svěrák, T. Air filtration performance of symmetric polypropylene hollow-fibre membranes for nanoparticle removal. Sep. Purif. Technol.
**2018**, 197, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Feng, Y.; Wang, K.; Davies, C.; Wang, H. Carbon Nanotube/Alumina/Polyethersulfone Hybrid Hollow Fiber Membranes with Enhanced Mechanical and Anti-Fouling Properties. Nanomaterials
**2015**, 5, 1366–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version] - Wang, Z.; Wu, A.; Ciacchi, L.C.; Wei, G. Recent Advances in Nanoporous Membranes for Water Purification. Nanomaterials
**2018**, 8, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Experton, J.; Wu, X.; Martin, C.R. From Ion Current to Electroosmotic Flow Rectification in Asymmetric Nanopore Membranes. Nanomaterials
**2017**, 7, 445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Wang, L.-Y.; Yong, W.F.; Yu, L.E.; Chung, T.-S. Design of high efficiency PVDF-PEG hollow fibers for air filtration of ultrafine particles. J. Membr. Sci.
**2017**, 535, 342–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Li, M.; Feng, Y.; Wang, K.; Yong, W.F.; Yu, L.; Chung, T.-S. Novel Hollow Fiber Air Filters for the Removal of Ultrafine Particles in PM2.5 with Repetitive Usage Capability. Environ. Sci. Technol.
**2017**, 51, 10041–10049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Zena Membranes s.r.o. Brno, Czech Republic. Available online: www.zena-membranes.cz/ (accessed on 19 June 2018).
- Asmatulu, R.; Muppalla, H.; Veisi, Z.; Khan, W.; Asaduzzaman, A.; Nuraje, N. Study of Hydrophilic Electrospun Nanofiber Membranes for Filtration of Micro and Nanosize Suspended Particles. Membranes
**2013**, 3, 375–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Zander, N.; Gillan, M.; Sweetser, D. Recycled PET Nanofibers for Water Filtration Applications. Materials
**2016**, 9, 247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Beatriz, S.-P.; Luis, N.; Leonor, C.; Laura, M.; Elena, M.; Yolanda, F.-N. Imaging Techniques and Scanning Electron Microscopy as Tools for Characterizing a Si-Based Material Used in Air Monitoring Applications. Materials
**2016**, 9, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Balamurugan, R.; Sundarrajan, S.; Ramakrishna, S. Recent Trends in Nanofibrous Membranes and Their Suitability for Air and Water Filtrations. Membranes
**2011**, 1, 232–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Galka, N.; Saxena, A. High efficiency air filtration: The growing impact of membranes. Filtration
**2009**, 46, 22–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Cyrs, W.D.; Boysen, D.A.; Casuccio, G.; Lersch, T.; Peters, T.M. Nanoparticle collection efficiency of capillary pore membrane filters. J. Aerosol Sci.
**2010**, 41, 655–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Spurny, K.R.; Gentry, J.W. Aerosol fractionization by graded nuclepore filters. A review. Powder Technol.
**1979**, 24, 129–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Shaw, G.E. Nuclepore filters as diffusion screens: Effect of barrel-shaped pore distortions. J. Aerosol Sci.
**1985**, 16, 307–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gentry, J.W.; Spurny, K.R. Measurements of collection efficiency of nuclepore filters for asbestos fibers. J. Colloid Interface Sci.
**1978**, 65, 174–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Romo-Kröger, C.M. A qualitative study of atmospheric aerosols and particles deposited on flat membrane surfaces by microscopy and other techniques. Powder Technol.
**2006**, 161, 235–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wang, C.; Otani, Y. Removal of Nanoparticles from Gas Streams by Fibrous Filters: A Review. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.
**2012**, 52, 5–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Brown, R.C. Air Filtration: An Integrated Approach to the Theory and Applications of Fibrous Filters; Elsevier Science & Technology Books: New York, NY, USA, 1993; ISBN 978-0-08-041274-0. [Google Scholar]
- Maddineni, A.K.; Das, D.; Damodaran, R.M. Air-borne particle capture by fibrous filter media under collision effect: A CFD-based approach. Sep. Purif. Technol.
**2018**, 193, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kasper, G.; Schollmeier, S.; Meyer, J.; Hoferer, J. The collection efficiency of a particle-loaded single filter fiber. J. Aerosol Sci.
**2009**, 40, 993–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wang, J.; Chen, D.R.; Pui, D.Y.H. Modeling of filtration efficiency of nanoparticles in standard filter media. J. Nanopart. Res.
**2007**, 9, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kirsch, A.A.; Fuchs, N.A. Studies on Fibrous Aerosol Filters—III Diffusional Deposition of Aerosols in Fibrous Filters. Ann. Occup. Hyg.
**1968**, 299–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Stechkina, I.; Kirsch, A.; Fuchs, N. Studies on Fibrous Aerosol Filters—IV Calculation of Aerosol Deposition in Model Filters in the Range of Maximum Penetration. Ann. Occup. Hyg.
**1969**, 12, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Pich, J. The filtration theory of highly dispersed aerosols. Staub Reinhalt. Luft
**1965**, 5, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lee, K.W.; Liu, B.Y.H. Theoretical Study of Aerosol Filtration by Fibrous Filters. Aerosol Sci. Technol.
**1982**, 1, 147–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Kirsch, A.A.; Stechkina, I.B. The Theory of Aerosol Filtration with Fibrous Filters. In Fundamentals of Aerosol Science; Shaw, D.T., Ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1978. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, B.Y.H.; Rubow, K.L. Efficiency, pressure drop and figure of merit of high efficiency fibrous and membrane filter media. In Proceedings of the 5th World Filtration Congress, Nice, France, 5–8 June 1990; p. 112. [Google Scholar]
- Payet, S.; Boulaud, D.; Madelaine, G.; Renoux, A. Penetration and pressure drop of a HEPA filter during loading with submicron liquid particles. J. Aerosol Sci.
**1992**, 23, 723–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kuwabara, S. The Forces experienced by Randomly Distributed Parallel Circular Cylinders or Spheres in a Viscous Flow at Small Reynolds Numbers. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.
**1959**, 14, 527–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bałazy, A.; Podgórski, A. Deposition efficiency of fractal-like aggregates in fibrous filters calculated using Brownian dynamics method. J. Colloid Interface Sci.
**2007**, 311, 323–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Zhang, Y. Indoor Air Quality Engineering, 1st ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2005; ISBN 978-1-56670-674-2. [Google Scholar]
- Lamb, H. Hydrodynamics; University Press: Oxford, UK, 1916. [Google Scholar]
- Langmuir, I. OSRD Report No. 865; Office of Scientific Research and Development: Washington, DC, USA, 1942.
- Stechkina, I.B.; Fuchs, N.A.F. Studies on Fibrous Aerosol Filters—I. Calculation of Diffusional Deposition of Aerosols in Fibrous Filters. Ann. Occup. Hyg.
**1966**, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lee, K.W.; Gieseke, J.A. Note on the approximation of interceptional collection efficiencies. J. Aerosol Sci.
**1980**, 11, 335–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Pich, J. The effectiveness of the barrier effect in fiber filters at small Knudsen numbers. Staub Reinhalt. Luft
**1966**, 26, 1–4. [Google Scholar] - Landahl, H.D.; Herrmann, R.G. Sampling of liquid aerosols by wires, cylinders, and slides, and the efficiency of impaction of the droplets. J. Colloid Sci.
**1949**, 4, 103–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Saleh, A.M.; Hosseini, S.A.; Tafreshi, H.V.; Pourdeyhimi, B. 3-D microscale simulation of dust-loading in thin flat-sheet filters: A comparison with 1-D macroscale simulations. Chem. Eng. Sci.
**2013**, 99, 284–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Fuchs, N.A. The Mechanics of Aerosols, 1st ed.; Pergamon Press: London, UK, 1964; ISBN 978-0-486-66055-4. [Google Scholar]
- Gougeon, R.; Boulaud, D.; Renoux, A. Comparison of theory and experiment in stationary filtration. J. Aerosol Sci.
**1993**, 24, S273–S274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Friedlander, S.K. Aerosol Filtration by Fibrous Filters. In Biochemical and Biological Engineering Science; Academic Press: London, UK, 1967; pp. 49–67. ISBN 978-0-12-103601-0. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, C.; Lin, C.-H.; Cheung, C.S. Inertial impaction-dominated fibrous filtration with rectangular or cylindrical fibers. Powder Technol.
**2000**, 112, 149–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Suneja, S.K.; Lee, C.H. Aerosol filtration by fibrous filters at intermediate Reynolds numbers (≤ 100). Atmos. Environ.
**1974**, 8, 1081–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ilias, S.; Douglas, P.L. Inertial impaction of aerosol particles on cylinders at intermediate and high reynolds numbers. Chem. Eng. Sci.
**1989**, 44, 81–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ptak, T.; Jaroszczyk, T. Theoretical-Experimental Aerosol Filtration Model for Fibrous Filters at Intermediate Reynolds Numbers. In Proceedings of the 5th World Filtration Congress, Nice, France, 5–8 June 1990; pp. 566–572. [Google Scholar]
- Chambers, F.W.; Al-Sarkhi, A.; Yao, S. Velocity distribution effects in air filter testing. Part. Sci. Technol.
**2001**, 19, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Pich, J. Impaction of aerosol particles in the neighbourhood of a circular hole. Collect. Czechoslov. Chem. Commun.
**1964**, 29, 2223–2227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Spurny, K.; Lodge, J.P.; Frank, E.R.; Sheesley, D.C. Aerosol filtration by means of Nuclepore filters: Structural and filtration properties. Environ. Sci. Technol.
**1969**, 3, 453–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Manton, M.J. Brownian diffusion of aerosols to the face of a nuclepore filter. Atmos. Environ.
**1979**, 13, 525–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lu, Y.; Shah, K.; Xu, J. Synthesis, Morphologies and Building Applications of Nanostructured Polymers. Polymers
**2017**, 9, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Leung, W.W.-F.; Hung, C.-H.; Yuen, P.-T. Effect of face velocity, nanofiber packing density and thickness on filtration performance of filters with nanofibers coated on a substrate. Sep. Purif. Technol.
**2010**, 71, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wang, Q.; Bai, Y.; Xie, J.; Jiang, Q.; Qiu, Y. Synthesis and filtration properties of polyimide nanofiber membrane/carbon woven fabric sandwiched hot gas filters for removal of PM 2.5 particles. Powder Technol.
**2016**, 292, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wang, J.; Tronville, P. Toward standardized test methods to determine the effectiveness of filtration media against airborne nanoparticles. J. Nanopart. Res.
**2014**, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] - Rajagopalan, R.; Tien, C. Trajectory analysis of deep-bed filtration with the sphere-in-cell porous media model. AIChE J.
**1976**, 22, 523–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zhong, W.; Pan, N. Aerosol Filtration by Fibrous Filters: A Statistical Mechanics Approach. Text. Res. J.
**2007**, 77, 284–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Israelachvili, J.N. Intermolecular and Surface Forces, 3rd ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; ISBN 978-0-12-375182-9. [Google Scholar]

**Figure 4.**Evaluation of collector diameter (

**a**) and pore size (

**b**) from SEM images using Stream Motion software.

**Figure 5.**Comparison of impaction efficiency based on different models and airflow velocity of 5 cm/s (

**a**) and 20 cm/s (

**b**) in relation to Stokes number.

**Figure 7.**Comparison of SCE due to diffusion mechanisms based on different models for an airflow velocity of 5 cm/s (

**a**) and 20 cm/s (

**b**) in relation to the Peclet number.

**Figure 9.**Single collector efficiency (

**a**), overall filter efficiency (

**b**) and overall penetration (

**c**).

**Figure 13.**Overall efficiency in relation to particle size based on CPM model for a velocity of 5 and 10 cm/s (

**a**) and 15 and 20 cm/s (

**b**).

Fiber wall thickness, Z (µm) | 36 |

Average pore size, d_{o} (nm) | 205 ± 157 |

Average collector diameter, d_{f} (nm) | 90 ± 83 |

Solidity, α (%) | 48 |

Porosity, ε (%) | 52 |

Temperature, T (K) | 296.15 |

Air density, ρ (kg m^{−3}) | 1.21 |

Air dynamic viscosity, µ (Pa s) | 1.83 × 10^{−5} |

Particle density, ρ_{p} (kg m^{−3}) | 1060 |

Mean free path of air molecules, λ (nm) | 67.3 |

© 2018 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Bulejko, P.
Numerical Comparison of Prediction Models for Aerosol Filtration Efficiency Applied on a Hollow-Fiber Membrane Pore Structure. *Nanomaterials* **2018**, *8*, 447.
https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8060447

**AMA Style**

Bulejko P.
Numerical Comparison of Prediction Models for Aerosol Filtration Efficiency Applied on a Hollow-Fiber Membrane Pore Structure. *Nanomaterials*. 2018; 8(6):447.
https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8060447

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Bulejko, Pavel.
2018. "Numerical Comparison of Prediction Models for Aerosol Filtration Efficiency Applied on a Hollow-Fiber Membrane Pore Structure" *Nanomaterials* 8, no. 6: 447.
https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8060447