Next Article in Journal
Formation and Controlled Drug Release Using a Three-Component Supramolecular Hydrogel for Anti-Schistosoma Japonicum Cercariae
Next Article in Special Issue
Reduction of Nitroarenes into Aryl Amines and N-Aryl hydroxylamines via Activation of NaBH4 and Ammonia-Borane Complexes by Ag/TiO2 Catalyst
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Saturation Pressure Difference on Metal–Silicide Nanopowder Formation in Thermal Plasma Fabrication
Previous Article in Special Issue
N-doped TiO2 Nanotubes as an Effective Additive to Improve the Catalytic Capability of Methanol Oxidation for Pt/Graphene Nanocomposites
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 6
Issue 3
10.3390/nano6030045
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Atomic Layer Deposition of Pt Nanoparticles within the Cages of MIL-101: A Mild and Recyclable Hydrogenation Catalyst

by
Karen Leus
1,*,
Jolien Dendooven
2,
Norini Tahir
1,
Ranjith K. Ramachandran
2,
Maria Meledina
3,
Stuart Turner
3,
Gustaaf Van Tendeloo
3,
Jan L. Goeman
4,
Johan Van der Eycken
4,
Christophe Detavernier
2 and
Pascal Van Der Voort
1,*
1
Department of Inorganic and Physical Chemistry, Center for Ordered Materials, Organometallics and Catalysis (COMOC), Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281-S3, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
2
Department of Solid State Sciences, Conformal Coatings on Nanomaterials (CoCooN), Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281-S1, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
3
EMAT, University of Antwerp, Groenenborgerlaan 171, B-2020 Antwerp, Belgium
4
Department of Organic and Macromolecular Chemistry, Laboratory for Organic and Bioorganic Synthesis, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281-S4, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2016, 6(3), 45; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano6030045
Submission received: 1 February 2016 / Revised: 29 February 2016 / Accepted: 2 March 2016 / Published: 9 March 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanoparticles for Catalysis)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
We present the in situ synthesis of Pt nanoparticles within MIL-101-Cr (MIL = Materials Institute Lavoisier) by means of atomic layer deposition (ALD). The obtained Pt@MIL-101 materials were characterized by means of N2 adsorption and X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) measurements, showing that the structure of the metal organic framework was well preserved during the ALD deposition. X-ray fluorescence (XRF) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis confirmed the deposition of highly dispersed Pt nanoparticles with sizes determined by the MIL-101-Cr pore sizes and with an increased Pt loading for an increasing number of ALD cycles. The Pt@MIL-101 material was examined as catalyst in the hydrogenation of different linear and cyclic olefins at room temperature, showing full conversion for each substrate. Moreover, even under solvent free conditions, full conversion of the substrate was observed. A high concentration test has been performed showing that the Pt@MIL-101 is stable for a long reaction time without loss of activity, crystallinity and with very low Pt leaching.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Metal Organic Frameworks (MOFs) are a class of porous crystalline materials consisting of discrete inorganic and organic secondary building units. Due to their exceptionally high porosity, pore volume, large surface area and chemical tunability and flexibility, they have already been examined in a wide range of areas such as gas storage and separations, sensing, drug delivery, ion exchange and as heterogeneous catalysts [1,2,3]. When used as a heterogeneous catalyst, MOFs can be examined as such or can be utilized as a support to stabilize catalytic active sites [4]. Besides the encapsulation of homogeneous complexes [5] and polyoxometalates [6], there is a growing research interest towards the embedding of nanoparticles (NPs) into MOFs [7]. The size, shape and orientation of the NPs can be controlled by adjusting the pore size and shape of the MOFs. Moreover, the nanopores of the MOFs can be used as templates for the synthesis of monodispersed NPs. Thus far, mainly Pd [8], Au [9], Ru [10], Cu [11], Pt [12], Ni [13] and Ag [14] NPs have been incorporated into MOFs through incipient wetness impregnation, colloidal deposition, solid grinding and chemical vapor deposition.
In recent years, atomic layer deposition (ALD) has gained renewed attention as a flexible method for tailoring mesoporous materials toward specific catalytic applications [15,16,17]. ALD is a self-limited deposition method that is characterized by alternating exposure of the substrate to vapor-phase precursors to grow oxides, nitrides, sulfides and (noble) metals [18]. The self-limiting nature of the chemical reactions yield atomic level thickness control and excellent uniformity on complex three-dimensional supports such as mesoporous materials. In noble metal ALD, islands are often formed at the start of the ALD process instead of continuous layers. This island growth can be used advantageously to synthesize noble metal NPs on large surface area supports. Several authors have demonstrated the successful synthesis of highly dispersed Pt NPs with narrow size distributions [19,20,21,22,23,24]. Despite the unique advantages of MOFs as a scaffold in catalytic systems, noble metal ALD in MOFs has not yet been explored. The main challenge for ALD in MOFs is the slow diffusion of the chemical precursors within Ǻngstrom sized pores [25,26,27]. Therefore, Hupp and coworkers fabricated a Zr-based NU-1000 MOF with large 1D hexagonal channels (~30 Ǻ) and successfully realized the ALD-based incorporation of acidic Al3+ and Zn2+ sites [28] and catalytically active cobalt sulfide [29]. Computational efforts provided mechanistic insight in the interaction of the ALD precursors with the MOF nodes [30]. Very recently, Jeong et al. reported the ALD of NiO within the framework of MIL-101-Cr (MIL = Materials Institute Lavoisier) [31]. This MIL-101 framework consists of two types of pores with inner pore diameters in the low mesoporous regime (~25–35 Ǻ) and is thermally stable up to 300 °C. The MIL-101 framework is built up by Cr3O-carboxylate trimers and terephthalate linkers with octahedrally coordinated metal ions binding terminal water molecules (see Figure S1) [32]. Hwang et al. [33] have demonstrated that these coordinated water molecules can be easily removed by a thermal treatment under vacuum at a temperature of 150 °C, creating coordinatively unsaturated sites (CUSs) which could be used, besides the Cr3O trimers, as initial binding sites for the anchoring of nanoparticles. Because of these advantages, MIL-101-Cr was selected in this work as the MOF host for catalytically active Pt NPs synthesized by ALD. It is shown that Pt ALD results in highly dispersed, uniformly sized NPs embedded within both the small and larger MIL-101 pores. In addition, this paper reports on the catalytic properties of the Pt@MIL-101 material in the hydrogenation of different linear and cyclic olefins at room temperature.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Characterization of Pt@MIL-101-Cr

2.1.1. X-Ray Diffraction, Nitrogen Adsorption and Determination of the Pt Loading

The Pt loading of each Pt@MIL-101-Cr material was determined by means of XRF (see Table 1). As expected, an increasing number of ALD cycles resulted in a higher Pt loading. For the 40, 80 and 120 ALD cycles, a Pt loading of respectively 0.21, 0.30 and 0.35 mmol·g−1 was obtained. The latter sample was used for the catalytic evaluation.
Additionally, the crystallinity of the Pt@MIL-101-Cr materials was examined by means of X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) measurements. In Figure 1, the XRPD patterns of the pristine MIL-101-Cr and the Pt@MIL-101-Cr materials obtained after the ALD deposition of the Pt nanoparticles using different cycles is presented. The XRPD pattern of each Pt@MIL-101-Cr material presents the pure phase of the non functionalized MIL-101-Cr. This explicitly shows that the framework integrity of the parent MOF was well preserved during the ALD deposition process, despite the use of ozone as reactant. Nitrogen sorption measurements were carried out to determine the Langmuir surface area of the pristine MIL-101-Cr and Pt@MIL-101-Cr materials (see Table 1 and Figure S2 for the nitrogen adsorption isotherms). The MIL-101-Cr has a Langmuir surface area of 3614 m2/g, which is significantly higher than the value usually reported in literature because of an extra activation step carried out to remove the free organic linker [34,35]. Only the group of Férey reported a higher Langmuir surface area of approximately 5900 m2/g by adding hydrogen fluoride (HF) to the synthesis of the framework [36]. No significant change in the Langmuir surface area is observed for the Pt@MIL-101-Cr materials obtained after 40 cycles and even after 80 ALD cycles. In addition, inspecting the capillary condensation step in Figure S2, it is clear that there is no obvious pore size reduction upon increasing the number of ALD cycles which is in contrast to the work of Snurr, Hupp and Farha [28,37], but, in these cases, metal oxides were prepared by cycling a metal precursor and water in the MOF framework. These adsorption data corroborate the finding that Pt (as a zerovalent metal) is formed as nanoparticles inside the pores, rather than by a layer by layer deposition on the walls, which would result in a gradual pore mouth and cage size reduction. This is further corroborated by tomography and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) data.

2.1.2. TEM Measurements

In order to investigate the Pt loading in the Pt@MIL-101-Cr, (high angle) annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy measurements ((HA)ADF-STEM) were carried out on the Pt@MIL-101-Cr-120 cycles sample. As MOFs are known to be extremely sensitive to the electron beam, the electron dose, dwell time and the image magnification were optimized in order to acquire images of the intact MIL-101-Cr framework [38].
The MIL-101-Cr crystals in the Pt@MIL-101-Cr-120 cycles sample demonstrate a typical truncated octahedral morphology, with predominant {111} facets and {100} truncation (Figure 2a). It is clear from the high magnification ADF-STEM images (bottom row in Figure 2) that the MIL-101-Cr crystals maintain their initial crystallinity after the ALD deposition of Pt nanoparticles. The bright contrast features in the images correspond to the heavy Pt nanoparticles which are evenly dispersed in the MIL-101-Cr crystals. The Pt nanoparticle size matches well with the pore diameter of the MIL-101-Cr framework, indicating that they are likely embedded within the pores of the MIL-101-Cr framework. To completely fill the smaller cages with Pt, around 900 Pt atoms are needed, and, in the case of the bigger cages, ~1400 atoms, which is in accordance with the observed Pt NP size of ~2–3 nm. However, the HA(ADF) images are only 2D projections of 3D objects. The direct method to determine the 3D position of the nanoparticles is electron tomography which has been performed on the ALD-loaded Pt@MIL-101 in our previous work. An additional electron tomography series was acquired in this study (see Figure S3 and Movie M.1) on a heavily Pt loaded MIL-101-Cr crystal, which unambiguously demonstrates that the ALD loading of Pt NP into the MIL-101-Cr frameworks leads to the embedding of nanoparticles inside the cages of the MOF host [38]. However, it is also clear from this and our previous study that some of the Pt is remaining at the surface, mostly in the form of larger Pt chunks.

2.2. Catalytic Results

A number of reports have already demonstrated the potential of Pt nanoparticles as hydrogenation catalysts. Within this regard, Pt nanoparticles have been immobilized on different supports like carbon nanotubes, silica based materials and MOFs [39,40]. While, in this study, cyclic and linear olefins were utilized as substrates to examine the catalytic performance of Pt@MIL-101-Cr, other studies have used this MOF for the hydrogenation of nitroarenes [41,42], cinnamaldehyde [43] and for the assymetric hydrogenation of α-ketoesters [44]. Additionally, besides these liquid phase based hydrogenation reactions, gas phase olefin hydrogenation reactions have been reported for Pt@MOF catalysts [45,46]. In Table 2, an overview is presented of the investigated substrates employing Pt@MIL-101-Cr-120 cycles as catalyst, compared to some other studies that used Pt@MOF catalysts, while in Figure S4 the conversion patterns using Pt@MIL-101-Cr-120 cycles as catalyst are shown. In Table 3, the TON, TOF and Pt leaching is presented. As can be seen from Table 2, the Pt@MIL-101-Cr-120 cycles exhibits approximately full conversion in the hydrogenation of each examined substrate. For 1-octene full conversion was observed after only 30 min of reaction (entry 5), whereas for styrene (entry 6) 97% conversion was noted after 3 h with the formation of respectively n-Octane and ethyl benzene. However, it is important to note that the blank reactions for the latter substrates already showed a high converison. More specifically, a conversion of 37% of 1-octene was seen after 30 min of reaction whereas, for styrene, 50% was already converted after 3 h of reaction in the absence of the catalyst. For the other examined substrates, cyclohexene and cyclooctene, the conversions obtained for the blank reactions were significantly lower with only 11% cyclohexene conversion after 2 h of reaction time and no conversion of cyclooctene under these reaction conditions. In the presence of the catalyst, 94% of cyclooctene was converted after 6 h (entry 7), whereas, for cyclohexene, 98% of conversion was noted after just two hours of reaction (entry 8). The latter substrate can also be converted under solvent free conditions (entry 9). Full conversion was noted after 20 h of reaction.
Additionally, the Pt@MIL-101-Cr-120 cycles’ catalyst was compared with other Pt@MOF based heterogeneous catalysts for the hydrogenation of linear and cyclic olefins. Although it is difficult to give an objective comparison, as different catalytic conditions were used in these tests, it can be seen from Table 2 that each Pt based catalyst, including the Pt@MIL-101-Cr-120 cycles, exhibits a good catalytic performance in the hydrogenation of alkenes except for the Pt@ZIF-8 (ZIF = zeolitic imidazolate framework) in the hydrogenation of cyclooctene. For the substrate 1-hexene, using Pt@ZIF-8, 95% of conversion in 24 h was obtained with no side product formation, whereas almost no activity was seen in the hydrogenation of cyclooctene (2.7%) (entry 2 and 3). The authors adressed this difference in activity to the difference in size of the examined substates, as cyclooctene has a molecular width of 5.7 Å which exceeds the size of the apertures of ZIF-8 (3.4 Å) [48]. The pore aperture in MIL-101-Cr is significantly larger (12 and 15 Å), as MIL-101-Cr contains two types of cages having a diameter of respectively 29 Å and 34 Å. The enhanced catalytic performance of the Pt@MIL-101-Cr-120 cycles catalyst in comparison to the reported Pt@ZIF-8 for the hydrogenation of cyclooctene can be assigned to this difference in pore aperture. For cyclohexene, styrene and cyclooctene the turnover frequency (TOF) is respectively 4.4 min−1, 3.7 min−1 and 1.93 min−1, as can be expected as the kinetics slow down as the molecules become larger. Furthermore, the room temperature based conversion of styrene in this work, in a very recent study of Li et al. [49], the latter substrate was fully converted at the same reaction time (3 h) under a H2 pressure of 1 bar through use of a bimetallic Pt-Ni frame@MOF-74, but no product distribution was presented (entry 4).

2.3. Reusability and Stability Tests

To examine the reusability of the Pt@MIL-101-Cr-120 cycles catalyst, a high concentration run was carried out in which 10 times more substrate was added in comparison to the previous catalytic experiments, without changing the catalyst loading. This procedure is employed when little catalyst is available, as repeated filtration steps result in cumulative catalyst losses. In addition, 250 Mmol of cyclooctene was added into the Parr reactor and the reaction was monitored until full conversion was obtained. As can be seen from Figure S5, nearly full conversion was reached after approximately 168 h of reaction. This observation demonstrates that the Pt@MIL-101-Cr-120 cycles catalyst does not lose its activity nor becomes deactivated during many turnovers. Additionally, during this high concentration run, only a negligible amount of Pt NPs was leached out: 0.81% of Pt was leached from the Pt@MIL-101-Cr-120 cycles. The turnover number TON (determined at the end of the reaction) and TOF (determined after 2 h of catalysis) number for this concentrated run is respectively 4859 and 108 h−1. Comparison of the XRPD patterns of the Pt@MIL-101-Cr-120 cycles before and after catalysis clearly shows that no changes are observed in the XRPD pattern of the Pt@MIL-101-Cr-120 cycles after catalysis when compared to the pristine MOF, even after the high concentration run (see Figure 3). The latter observation shows that the framework integrity of the MOF was preserved.
Additionally, in Figure S6, the nitrogen adsorption isotherms are presented for the Pt@MIL-101 material before and after catalysis. From this figure, one can see that the Langmuir surface area slightly decreased after catalysis, which is probably due to a partial clogging of the pores during the catalytic testing. The fresh catalyst has a Langmuir surface area of 3210 m2/g, the Pt@MIL-101-Cr-120 cycles-run 1 and Pt@MIL-101-Cr-120 cycles-concentrated run have a Langmuir surface area of 2650 and 2700 m2/g respectively. Moreover, annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy measurements were carried out on the Pt@MIL-101-Cr-120 cycles after run 1 (Figure 2b) and after the high concentration run (Figure 2c). It can be seen from these images that the morphology of the MIL-101 particles remains similar to these of the fresh Pt@MIL-101-Cr-120 cycles sample and that the MIL-101 framework retains its crystalline nature. Additionally, no significant agglomeration of the Pt nanoparticles is observed, even after the high concentration run.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Materials and Methods

All chemicals were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Diegem, Belgium) or TCI Europe (Zwijndrecht, Belgium) and used without further purification. Nitrogen adsorption experiments were carried out at −196 °C using a Belsorp-mini II gas analyzer (Rubotherm, Bochum, Germany). Prior to analysis, the samples were dried under vacuum at 90 °C to remove adsorbed water. XRPD patterns were collected on a ARL X’TRA X-ray diffractometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Erembodegem, Belgium) with Cu Ka radiation of 0.15418 nm wavelength and a solid state detector. XRF measurements were performed on a NEX CG from Rigaku (Addspex, Abcoude, the Netherlands) using a Mo-X-ray source (Addspex, Abcoude, the Netherlands) Elemental analyses was conducted using a Vista-MPX CCD Simultaneous Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometer (ICP-OES) (Waltham, MA, USA). HAADF-STEM and ADF-STEM imaging was carried out on a FEI Tecnai Osiris microscope (Hillsboro, Oregon, USA), operated at 200 kV. The convergence semi-angle used was 10 mrad, the inner ADF detection angle was 14 mrad, the inner HAADF-STEM detection angle was 50 mrad.

3.2. Catalytic Setup

In each catalytic test, the Parr reactor was loaded with 70.0 mL ethanol and 2.84 mL of dodecane used respectively as solvent and internal standard. The examined substrates in this study are 1-octene, styrene, cyclooctene and cyclohexene (25 mmol). The Pt@MIL-101-Cr-120 cycles was used as the catalyst. For each examined substrate, the same loading of active sites was employed. More specifically in every catalytic test, 0.05 mmol Pt sites were used which give rise to a molar ratio of substrate: catalyst of 500:1. The TON number was calculated by dividing the mmol obtained product by the number of active sites while the TOF number was determined by dividing the TON number by the reaction time (expressed in minutes). All the catalytic tests were performed at room temperature and at a pressure of 6 bar H2. During each test, aliquots were gradually taken out of the mixture and subsequently analyzed by means of gas chromatography (GC) using a split injection (ratio 1:17) on a Hewlett Packard 5890 Series II GC with TCD detection (Santa Clara, CA, USA). The capillary column used was a Restek XTI-5 column (Bellefonte, PA, USA) with a length of 30 m, an internal diameter of 0.25 mm and a film thickness of 0.25 μm. H2 was used as carrier gas under constant flow conditions (1.4 mL/min).The fresh catalyst was activated under vacuum at 90 °C overnight prior to catalysis. After each catalytic run, the catalyst was recovered by filtration, washed with acetone, and dried at 90 °C overnight under vacuum.

3.3. Synthesis of MIL-101-Cr and Pt@MIL-101-Cr

The MIL-101-Cr was synthesized according to a slightly modified procedure of Edler et al. [34]. Typically, 0.6645 g of terephthalic acid was mixed with 1.6084 g of Cr(NO3)3·9H2O and 20 mL of destilled water. The mixture was transferred into a Teflon-lined autoclave, sealed and heated in 2 h to 210 °C at which it was hold for 8 h. After cooling down to room temperature, the MIL-101as was filtered, washed with acetone and stirred in dimethylformamide for 24 h at 60 °C to remove unreacted terephthalic acid. Thereafter, the MIL-101 was stirred in 1M HCl for 12 h at room temperature, filtered and dried under vacuum at 90 degrees overnight. The deposition of the Pt nanoparticles was achieved by means of ALD. Pt ALD on the powder sample was performed at 200 °C using (methylcyclopentadienyl)-trimethylplatinum [MeCpPtMe3] as Pt source and O3 as reactant [50]. All the depositions were conducted in a home built experimental cold-wall ALD chamber connected through a gate valve to a turbo pump backed up by a rotary pump. A second gate valve was installed for pre-evacuation of the chamber via a bypass line to the rotary pump. The powder sample was loaded in a molybdenum sample cup which was then transferred into the ALD reactor through the load-lock and was placed on a heater block. After loading into the reactor, the powder sample was allowed to outgas and thermally equilibrate for at least 1 h under vacuum. The solid MeCpPtMe3 precursor (99% Strem Chemicals), kept in a stainless steel container, was heated above its melting point (30 °C), and the delivery line to the chamber was heated to 60 °C. Argon was used as a carrier gas for the Pt precursor. O3 was produced from a pure O2 flow with an OzoneLab™ OL100 ozone generator (Ozone Services, Burton, BC, Canada), resulting in an O3 concentration of 175 μg/mL. A static exposure mode was applied during both ALD half-cycles [1,4]. The pulse time of the MeCpPtMe3 precursor was 10 s, after which the valves to the pumping system were kept closed for another 20 s, resulting in a total exposure time of 30 s. The same pulse time and exposure time was used for the O3 also. The effect of the exposure times on the Pt loading was not studied in detail. Nevertheless, these exposure times were found to be large enough to ensure penetration deep into the MOF crystals. During the precursor and reactant exposures, the pressure in the chamber increased to ca. 5 × 10−1 mbar and 1 mbar, respectively. In between the two exposures, the valve to the rotary pump was first opened for 10 s and then the valve to the turbo pump was opened for another 50 s to reach the base pressure.

4. Conclusions

Pt NPs were synthesized in situ within MIL-101-Cr by means of ALD, enabling the varying of Pt loading by changing the number of ALD cycles. Highly dispersed Pt NPs were obtained with sizes determined by the pore sizes of the MOF host. The Pt@MIL-101 materials maintained their porosity and crystallinity during the synthesis of the Pt NPs and during the catalytic hydrogenation of cyclic and linear olefins. Full conversion for every substrate was obtained using Pt@MIL-101 as catalyst under mild reaction conditions. Moreover, even under solvent free conditions, full conversion was shown with negligible leaching of Pt. Stability tests have demonstrated that the Pt@MIL-101 catalyst is stable for a long reaction time without loss in crystallinity or agglomeration of the Pt NPs, and with a high TOF and TON number.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/6/3/45/s1.

Acknowledgments

Karen Leus acknowledges the financial support from the Ghent University “Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds” BOF post-doctoral Grant 01P06813T and UGent “Geconcentreeerde Onderzoekacties” GOA Grant 01G00710. Jolien Dendooven and Stuart Turner gratefully acknowledges the “Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek” FWO Vlaanderen for a post-doctoral scholarship. Christophe Detavernier thanks the FWO Vlaanderen, BOF-UGent (GOA 01G01513) and the Hercules Foundation (AUGE/09/014) for financial support. The Titan microscope used for this investigation was partially funded by the Hercules foundation of the Flemish government. This work was supported by the “Belgian Interuniversitaire Attractie Pool-Pôle d'Attraction Interuniversitaire” IAP-PAI network.

Author Contributions

Christophe Detavernier and Pascal Van Der Voort had the original idea to anchor nanoparticles in the MIL-101 by means of ALD. Karen Leus and Norini Tahir carried out the synthesis of the MIL-101 material, characterization and catalytic testing of the Pt@MIL-101 materials whereas Jan L. Goeman and Johan Van der Eycken performed the GC analysis. Jolien Dendooven and Ranjith K. Ramachandran have done the ALD depositions. Maria Meledina, Stuart Turner and Gustaaf Van Tendeloo have performed the HAADF-STEM and ADF-STEM measurements. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cai, W.; Chu, C.C.; Liu, G.; Wang, Y.X.J. Metal-Organic Framework-Based Nanomedicine Platforms for Drug Delivery and Molecular Imaging. Small 2015, 11, 4806–4822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Leus, K.; Liu, Y.Y.; van der Voort, P. Metal-Organic Frameworks as Selective or Chiral Oxidation Catalysts. Catal. Rev. 2014, 56, 1–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Barea, E.; Montoro, C.; Navarro, J.A.R. Toxic gas removal metal-organic frameworks for the capture and degradation of toxic gases and vapours. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 5419–5430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Leus, K.; Liu, Y.Y.; Meledina, M.; Turner, S.; van Tendeloo, G.; van der Voort, P. A Mo-VI grafted Metal Organic Framework: Synthesis, characterization and catalytic investigations. J. Catal. 2014, 316, 201–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bogaerts, T.; van Yperen-De Deyne, A.; Liu, Y.Y.; Lynen, F.; van Speybroeck, V.; van der Voort, P. Mn-salen@MIL-101(Al): A heterogeneous, enantioselective catalyst synthesized using a ‘bottle around the ship’ approach. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 8021–8023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Juan-Alcaniz, J.; Ramos-Fernandez, E.V.; Lafont, U.; Gascon, J.; Kapteijn, F. Building MOF bottles around phosphotungstic acid ships: One–pot synthesis of bi-functional polyoxometalate-MIL-101 catalysts. J. Catal. 2010, 269, 229–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Meilikhov, M.; Yusenko, K.; Esken, D.; Turner, S.; van Tendeloo, G.; Fischer, R.A. Metals@MOFs-Loading MOFs with Metal Nanoparticles for Hybrid Functions. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 2010, 3701–3714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Luz, I.; Rosler, C.; Epp, K.; Xamena, F.X.L.I.; Fischer, R.A. Pd@UiO-66-Type MOFs Prepared by Chemical Vapor Infiltration as Shape-Selective Hydrogenation Catalysts. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 2015, 3904–3912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Leus, K.; Concepcion, P.; Vandichel, M.; Meledina, M.; Grirrane, A.; Esquivel, D.; Turner, S.; Poelman, D.; Waroquier, M.; van Speybroeck, V.; et al. Au@UiO-66: a base free oxidation catalyst. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 22334–22342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Schroeder, F.; Esken, D.; Cokoja, M.; van den Berg, M.W.E.; Lebedev, O.I.; van Tendeloo, G.; Walaszek, B.; Buntkowsky, G.; Limbach, H.H.; Chaudret, B.; et al. Ruthenium nanoparticles inside porous [Zn4O(bdc)3] by hydrogenolysis of adsorbed [Ru(cod)(cot)]: A solid-state reference system for surfactant-stabilized ruthenium colloids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 6119–6130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Juan-Alcaniz, J.; Ferrando-Soria, J.; Luz, I.; Serra-Crespo, P.; Skupien, E.; Santos, V.P.; Pardo, E.; Xamena, F.X.L.I.; Kapteijn, F.; Gascon, J. The oxamate route, a versatile post-functionalization for metal incorporation in MIL-101(Cr): Catalytic applications of Cu, Pd and Au. J. Catal. 2013, 307, 295–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xu, Z.D.; Yang, L.Z.; Xu, C.L. Pt@UiO-66 Heterostructures for Highly Selective Detection of Hydrogen Peroxide with an Extended Linear Range. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 3438–3444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhao, H.H.; Song, H.L.; Chou, L.J. Nickel nanoparticles supported on MOF-5: Synthesis and catalytic hydrogenation properties. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2012, 15, 261–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Abdelhameed, R.M.; Simoes, M.M.Q.; Silva, A.M.S.; Rocha, J. Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity of MIL-125 by Post-Synthetic Modification with Cr-III and Ag Nanoparticles. Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 11072–11081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. O’Neill, B.J.; Jackson, D.H.K.; Lee, J.; Canlas, C.; Stair, P.C.; Marshall, C.L.; Elam, J.W.; Kuech, T.F.; Dumesic, J.A.; Huber, G.W. Catalyst Design with Atomic Layer Deposition. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 1804–1825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Detavernier, C.; Dendooven, J.; Sree, S.P.; Ludwig, K.F.; Martens, J.A. Tailoring nanoporous materials by atomic layer deposition. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 5242–5253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Dendooven, J. Atomically-Precise Methods for Synthesis of Solid Catalysts; Hermans, S., Visart de Bocarme, T., Eds.; RSC: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015; Volume 1, p. 167. [Google Scholar]
  18. Miikkulainen, V.; Leskela, M.; Ritala, M.; Puurunen, R.L. Crystallinity of inorganic films grown by atomic layer deposition: Overview and general trends. J. Appl. Phys. 2013, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. King, J.S.; Wittstock, A.; Biener, J.; Kucheyev, S.O.; Wang, Y.M.; Baumann, T.F.; Giri, S.K.; Hamza, A.V.; Baeumer, M.; Bent, S.F. Ultralow loading of Pt nanocatalysts prepared by atomic layer deposition on carbon aerogels. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 2405–2409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Gould, T.D.; Lubers, A.M.; Corpuz, A.R.; Weimer, A.W.; Falconer, J.L.; Medlin, J.W. Controlling Nanoscale Properties of Supported Platinum Catalysts through Atomic Layer Deposition. ACS Catal. 2015, 5, 1344–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Goulas, A.; van Ommen, J.R. Atomic layer deposition of platinum clusters on titania nanoparticles at atmospheric pressure. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 4647–4650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Enterkin, J.A.; Setthapun, W.; Elam, J.W.; Christensen, S.T.; Rabuffetti, F.A.; Marks, L.D.; Stair, P.C.; Poeppelmeier, K.R.; Marshall, C.L. Propane Oxidation over Pt/SrTiO3 Nanocuboids. ACS Catal. 2011, 1, 629–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhou, Y.; King, D.M.; Liang, X.H.; Li, J.H.; Weimer, A.W. Optimal preparation of Pt/TiO2 photocatalysts using atomic layer deposition. Appl. Catal. B 2010, 101, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, J.H.; Liang, X.H.; King, D.M.; Jiang, Y.B.; Weimer, A.W. Highly dispersed Pt nanoparticle catalyst prepared by atomic layer deposition. Appl. Catal. B 2010, 97, 220–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dendooven, J.; Devloo-Casier, K.; Ide, M.; Grandfield, K.; Kurttepeli, M.; Ludwig, K.F.; Bals, S.; van der Voort, P.; Detavernier, C. Atomic layer deposition-based tuning of the pore size in mesoporous thin films studied by in situ grazing incidence small angle X-ray scattering. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 14991–14998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Sree, S.P.; Dendooven, J.; Jammaer, J.; Masschaele, K.; Deduytsche, D.; D’Haen, J.; Kirschhock, C.E.A.; Martens, J.A.; Detavernier, C. Anisotropic Atomic Layer Deposition Profiles of TiO2 in Hierarchical Silica Material with Multiple Porosity. Chem. Mater. 2012, 24, 2775–2780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dendooven, J.; Goris, B.; Devloo-Casier, K.; Levrau, E.; Biermans, E.; Baklanov, M.R.; Ludwig, K.F.; van der Voort, P.; Bals, S.; Detavernier, C. Tuning the Pore Size of Ink-Bottle Mesopores by Atomic Layer Deposition. Chem. Mater. 2012, 24, 1992–1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mondloch, J.E.; Bury, W.; Fairen-Jimenez, D.; Kwon, S.; DeMarco, E.J.; Weston, M.H.; Sarjeant, A.A.; Nguyen, S.T.; Stair, P.C.; Snurr, R.Q.; et al. Vapor-Phase Metalation by Atomic Layer Deposition in a Metal-Organic Framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 10294–10297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Peters, A.W.; Li, Z.Y.; Farha, O.K.; Hupp, J.T. Atomically Precise Growth of Catalytically Active Cobalt Sulfide on Flat Surfaces and within a Metal-Organic Framework via Atomic Layer Deposition. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 8484–8490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Kim, I.S.; Borycz, J.; Platero-Prats, A.E.; Tussupbayev, S.; Wang, T.C.; Farha, O.K.; Hupp, J.T.; Gagliardi, L.; Chapman, K.W.; Cramer, C.J.; et al. Targeted Single-Site MOF Node Modification: Trivalent Metal Loading via Atomic Layer Deposition. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 4772–4778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jeong, M.-G.; Kim, D.H.; Lee, S.-K.; Lee, J.H.; Han, S.W.; Park, E.J.; Cychosz, K.A.; Thommes, M.; Hwang, Y.K.; Chang, J.-S.; et al. Decoration of the internal structure of mesoporous chromium terephthalate MIL-101 with NiO using atomic layer deposition. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2016, 221, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Maksimchuk, N.V.; Zalomaeva, O.V.; Skobelev, I.Y.; Kovalenko, K.A.; Fedin, V.P.; Kholdeeva, O.A. Metal-organic frameworks of the MIL-101 family as heterogeneous single-site catalysts. Proc. R. Soc. 2012, 468, 2017–2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hwang, Y.K.; Hong, D.Y.; Chang, J.S.; Seo, H.; Yoon, M.; Kim, J.; Jhung, S.H.; Serre, C.; Ferey, G. Selective sulfoxidation of aryl sulfides by coordinatively unsaturated metal centers in chromium carboxylate MIL-101. Appl. Catal. 2009, 358, 249–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jiang, D.M.; Burrows, A.D.; Edler, K.J. Size-controlled synthesis of MIL-101(Cr) nanoparticles with enhanced selectivity for CO2 over N2. Crystengcomm 2011, 13, 6916–6919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Leus, K.; Bogaerts, T.; de Decker, J.; Depauw, H.; Hendrickx, K.; Vrielinck, H.; van Speybroeck, V.; van der Voort, P. Systematic Study of the Chemical and Hydrothermal Stability of Selected “Stable” Metal Organic Frameworks. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2016, 226, 110–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ferey, G.; Mellot-Draznieks, C.; Serre, C.; Millange, F.; Dutour, J.; Surble, S.; Margiolaki, I. A chromium terephthalate-based solid with unusally large pore volumes and surface area. Science 2005, 309, 2040–2042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Deria, P.; Mondloch, J.E.; Tylianakis, E.; Ghosh, P.; Bury, W.; Snurr, R.Q.; Hupp, J.T.; Farha, O.K. Perfluoroalkane Functionalization of NU-1000 via Solvent-Assisted Ligand Incorporation: Synthesis and CO2 Adsorption Studies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 16801–16804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Meledina, M.; Turner, S.; Filippousi, M.; Leus, K.; Lobato, I.; Ramachandran, R.K.; Dendooven, J.; Detavernier, C.; van der Voort, P.; van Tendeloo, G. Direct Imaging of ALD Deposited Pt Nanoclusters inside the Giant Pores of MIL-101. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, S.; Shao, Y.Y.; Yin, G.P.; Lin, Y.H. Carbon nanotubes decorated with Pt nanoparticles via electrostatic self-assembly: a highly active oxygen reduction electrocatalyst. J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 2826–2830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Joo, S.H.; Park, J.Y.; Tsung, C.K.; Yamada, Y.; Yang, P.D.; Somorjai, G.A. Thermally stable Pt/mesoporous silica core-shell nanocatalysts for high-temperature reactions. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 126–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Du, W.C.; Chen, G.Z.; Nie, R.F.; Li, Y.W.; Hou, Z.Y. Highly dispersed Pt in MIL-101: An efficient catalyst for the hydrogenation of nitroarenes. Catal. Commun. 2013, 41, 56–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pan, H.Y.; Li, X.H.; Yu, Y.; Li, J.R.; Hu, J.; Guan, Y.J.; Wu, P. Pt nanoparticles entrapped in mesoporous metal-organic frameworks MIL-101 as an efficient catalyst for liquid-phase hydrogenation of benzaldehydes and nitrobenzenes. J. Mol. Catal. 2015, 399, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Liu, H.L.; Li, Z.; Li, Y.W. Chemoselective Hydrogenation of Cinnamaldehyde over a Pt-Lewis Acid Collaborative Catalyst under Ambient Conditions. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2015, 54, 1487–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pan, H.Y.; Li, X.H.; Zhang, D.M.; Guan, Y.J.; Wu, P. Pt nanoparticles entrapped in mesoporous metal-organic frameworks MIL-101 as an efficient and recyclable catalyst for the assymetric hydrogenation of alpha-ketoesters. J. Mol. Catal. 2013, 377, 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Guo, Z.Y.; Xiao, C.X.; Maligal-Ganesh, R.V.; Zhou, L.; Goh, T.W.; Li, X.L.; Tesfagaber, D.; Thiel, A.; Huang, W.Y. Pt Nanoclusters Confined within Metal Organic Framework Cavities for Chemoselective Cinnamaldehyde Hydrogenation. ACS Catal. 2014, 4, 1340–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ramos-Fernandez, E.V.; Pieters, C.; van der Linden, B.; Juan-Alcaniz, J.; Serra-Crespo, P.; Verhoeven, M.W.G.M.; Niemantsverdriet, H.; Gascon, J.; Kapteijn, F. Highly dispersed platinum in metal organic framework NH2-MIL-101(Al) containing phosphotungstic acid- Characterization and catalytic performance. J. Catal. 2012, 289, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Khajavi, H.; Stil, H.A.; Kuipers, H.P.C.E.; Gascon, J.; Kapteijn, F. Shape and Transition State Selective Hydrogenations Using Egg-Shell Pt-MIL-101(Cr) Catalyst. ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 2617–2626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, P.; Zhao, J.; Li, X.B.; Yang, Y.; Yang, Q.H.; Li, C. Assembly of ZIF nanostructures around free Pt nanoparticles: Efficient size-selective catalysts for hydrogenation of alkenes under mild conditions. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 3330–3332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Li, Z.; Yu, R.; Huang, J.L.; Shi, Y.S.; Zhang, D.Y.; Zhong, X.Y.; Wang, D.S.; Wu, Y.E.; Li, Y.D. Platinum-nickel frame within metal-organic framework fabricated in situ for hydrogen enrichment and molecular sieving. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Dendooven, J.; Ramachandran, R.K.; Devloo-Casier, K.; Rampelberg, G.; Filez, M.; Poelman, H.; Marin, G.B.; Fonda, E.; Detavernier, C. Low-Temperature Atomic Layer Deposition of Platinum Using (Methylcyclopentadienyl)trimethylplatinum and Ozone. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 20557–20561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 06 00045 g001 1024
Figure 1. X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) patterns of MIL-101-Cr and the obtained Pt@MIL-101-Cr materials (MIL = Materials Institute Lavoisier).
Figure 1. X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) patterns of MIL-101-Cr and the obtained Pt@MIL-101-Cr materials (MIL = Materials Institute Lavoisier).
Nanomaterials 06 00045 g001
Nanomaterials 06 00045 g002 1024
Figure 2. (High angle) annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy measurements ((HA)ADF-STEM) (top row) and ADF-STEM (bottom row) images. (a) Fresh Pt@MIL-101-Cr-120 cycles; (b) Pt@MIL-101-Cr-120 cycles after run 1; (c) Pt@MIL-101-Cr-120 cycles after the high concentration run. The white arrows point to Pt nanoparticles with similar diameters to the MIL-101 framework pores.
Figure 2. (High angle) annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy measurements ((HA)ADF-STEM) (top row) and ADF-STEM (bottom row) images. (a) Fresh Pt@MIL-101-Cr-120 cycles; (b) Pt@MIL-101-Cr-120 cycles after run 1; (c) Pt@MIL-101-Cr-120 cycles after the high concentration run. The white arrows point to Pt nanoparticles with similar diameters to the MIL-101 framework pores.
Nanomaterials 06 00045 g002
Nanomaterials 06 00045 g003 1024
Figure 3. XRPD pattern of the pristine catalyst and after the first run and the concentrated run.
Figure 3. XRPD pattern of the pristine catalyst and after the first run and the concentrated run.
Nanomaterials 06 00045 g003
Table
Table 1. Langmuir surface area (Slang) and Pt loading of the Pt@MIL-101-Cr materials (MIL = Materials Institute Lavoisier).
Table 1. Langmuir surface area (Slang) and Pt loading of the Pt@MIL-101-Cr materials (MIL = Materials Institute Lavoisier).
SamplePt Loading (mmol·g−1)Slang (m2·g−1)Pore volume (cm3 g−1) *
MIL-101-Cr/36141.52
Pt@MIL-101-Cr-40 cycles0.2134181.47
Pt@MIL-101-Cr-80 cycles0.333041.48
Pt@MIL-101-Cr-120 cycles0.3532101.42
* After normalization for the amount of the Pt, determined at a relative pressure P/P0 = 0.98.
Table
Table 2. Comparison of the catalytic activity of Pt@MIL-101-120 cycles with other Pt based Metal Organic Frameworks (MOF) catalysts in the hydrogenation of cyclic and linear olefins.
Table 2. Comparison of the catalytic activity of Pt@MIL-101-120 cycles with other Pt based Metal Organic Frameworks (MOF) catalysts in the hydrogenation of cyclic and linear olefins.
EntryCatalystSubstrateReaction ConditionsReaction TimeConversionMain ProductReference
1Pt@MIL-1011-octene35 °C, solvent free at 1.5 bar of H26 h>99%n-Octane[47]
2Pt@ZIF-81-hexeneRT, ethanol at 1 bar of H224 h>95%n-Hexane[48]
3Pt@ZIF-8cycloocteneRT, ethanol at 1 bar of H224 h2.7%Cyclooctane[48]
4Pt-Ni frame@ Ni-MOF-74Styrene30 °C, THF at 1 bar of H23 h>99%/[49]
5Pt@MIL-1011-octeneRT, ethanol at 6 bar of H230 min>99%n-Octanethis work
6Pt@MIL-101StyreneRT, ethanol at 6 bar of H23h>97%Ethyl benzenethis work
7Pt@MIL-101cycloocteneRT, ethanol at 6 bar of H26h>94%Cyclooctanethis work
8Pt@MIL-101cyclohexeneRT, ethanol at 6 bar of H22h>98%Cyclohexanethis work
9Pt@MIL-101cyclohexene60 °C, solvent free at 6 bar of H220h>99%Cyclohexanethis work
Table
Table 3. The turnover number (TON), turnover frequency (TOF) and leaching percentage for each examined substrate using Pt@MIL-101-Cr-120 cycles as catalyst.
Table 3. The turnover number (TON), turnover frequency (TOF) and leaching percentage for each examined substrate using Pt@MIL-101-Cr-120 cycles as catalyst.
SubstrateTONTOF (min−1)Reaction TimeLeaching of Pt (%)
1-Octene49716.630 min<0.05 *
Styrene482.73.73h0.89
Cyclohexene4904.42h0.32
Cyclooctene4681.936h<0.05 *
* Below detection limit. The TON number was determined at the end of the reaction while the TOF number was determined after 30 min of catalysis.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Leus, K.; Dendooven, J.; Tahir, N.; Ramachandran, R.K.; Meledina, M.; Turner, S.; Van Tendeloo, G.; Goeman, J.L.; Van der Eycken, J.; Detavernier, C.; et al. Atomic Layer Deposition of Pt Nanoparticles within the Cages of MIL-101: A Mild and Recyclable Hydrogenation Catalyst. Nanomaterials 2016, 6, 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano6030045

AMA Style

Leus K, Dendooven J, Tahir N, Ramachandran RK, Meledina M, Turner S, Van Tendeloo G, Goeman JL, Van der Eycken J, Detavernier C, et al. Atomic Layer Deposition of Pt Nanoparticles within the Cages of MIL-101: A Mild and Recyclable Hydrogenation Catalyst. Nanomaterials. 2016; 6(3):45. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano6030045

Chicago/Turabian Style

Leus, Karen, Jolien Dendooven, Norini Tahir, Ranjith K. Ramachandran, Maria Meledina, Stuart Turner, Gustaaf Van Tendeloo, Jan L. Goeman, Johan Van der Eycken, Christophe Detavernier, and et al. 2016. "Atomic Layer Deposition of Pt Nanoparticles within the Cages of MIL-101: A Mild and Recyclable Hydrogenation Catalyst" Nanomaterials 6, no. 3: 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano6030045

APA Style

Leus, K., Dendooven, J., Tahir, N., Ramachandran, R. K., Meledina, M., Turner, S., Van Tendeloo, G., Goeman, J. L., Van der Eycken, J., Detavernier, C., & Van Der Voort, P. (2016). Atomic Layer Deposition of Pt Nanoparticles within the Cages of MIL-101: A Mild and Recyclable Hydrogenation Catalyst. Nanomaterials, 6(3), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano6030045

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop