Next Article in Journal
Dielectric Barrier Discharge (DBD) Plasma Assisted Synthesis of Ag2O Nanomaterials and Ag2O/RuO2 Nanocomposites
Next Article in Special Issue
Nanostructured Materials for Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond
Previous Article in Journal
N-doped TiO2 Nanotubes as an Effective Additive to Improve the Catalytic Capability of Methanol Oxidation for Pt/Graphene Nanocomposites
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nitrogen-Doped Banana Peel–Derived Porous Carbon Foam as Binder-Free Electrode for Supercapacitors
Open AccessReview

A Brief Review on Multivalent Intercalation Batteries with Aqueous Electrolytes

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Lamar University, Beaumont, TX 77710, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Andy (Xueliang) Sun and Xifei Li
Nanomaterials 2016, 6(3), 41;
Received: 23 November 2015 / Revised: 4 February 2016 / Accepted: 16 February 2016 / Published: 26 February 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanostructured Materials for Li-Ion Batteries and Beyond)


Rapidly growing global demand for high energy density rechargeable batteries has driven the research toward developing new chemistries and battery systems beyond Li-ion batteries. Due to the advantages of delivering more than one electron and giving more charge capacity, the multivalent systems have gained considerable attention. At the same time, affordability, ease of fabrication and safety aspects have also directed researchers to focus on aqueous electrolyte based multivalent intercalation batteries. There have been a decent number of publications disclosing capabilities and challenges of several multivalent battery systems in aqueous electrolytes, and while considering an increasing interest in this area, here, we present a brief overview of their recent progress, including electrode chemistries, functionalities and challenges.
Keywords: aqueous batteries; multivalent ion batteries; rechargeable batteries; energy storage; intercalation batteries; specific capacity; aqueous electrolyte aqueous batteries; multivalent ion batteries; rechargeable batteries; energy storage; intercalation batteries; specific capacity; aqueous electrolyte

1. Introduction

There has been a growing requirement for high energy density charge storage devices for load leveling purposes in power grids, automotive vehicles, solar power generation, wind mills and many other large and small scale applications [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. Currently, Li-ion batteries have been serving many of such applications ranging from small scale electronic gadgets to automotive vehicles. However, the long term concerns of high cost, limited reserves of lithium, and safety of Li-ion batteries have driven the researchers to search for alternative energy storage solutions. As a result, researchers have started to focus on other alkaline, alkaline earth and transition metal based rechargeable batteries [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. For example, there is plenty of research done on Na-ion batteries [9,10,11,12] and these are inexpensive and somewhat less hazardous compared to the Li-ion batteries, but they are yet univalent and not adequate enough to meet the increasing energy density demands. On the other hand, multivalent cations, for example Mg2+, Ca2+, Zn2+, Ni2+, Al3+, etc., have the ability to transfer more than one electron and thereby facilitate more energy storage than the univalent Li- and Na-ion batteries [16,18,19,20]. In addition, many of these multivalent ions are usually smaller than the univalent ions, and the volume changes associated with insertion of some of these ions are very similar to the volume changes observed in Li-ion battery electrodes, and it has also been supported by theoretical studies [21]. Considering the increasing demand for high energy density batteries and improved safety, in this article we mainly focus on reviewing the aqueous electrolyte based multivalent intercalation batteries.

2. Overview on Multivalent Intercalation Batteries

The multivalent cation chemistries are principally advantageous for their energy density and improved safety. In fact, many of these multivalent ions are light enough to deliver high energy densities compared to the Li-ion batteries. Table 1 shows a comparison of different multivalent metal anodes in terms of their standard electrode potentials, and specific and volumetric capacities with reference to Li and Na anodes. However, in practice, the development of multivalent battery systems is often hindered by lack of suitable cathode chemistries that show a good reversibility of ion intercalation.
There were some initial efforts in the 1990s by Gregory et al. [22] and Novak et al. [23,24,25] on non-aqueous multivalent Mg-ion batteries. Gregory et al. [22] showed a successful chemical and electrochemical insertion of Mg2+ into various transition metal oxides and sulfides. Novak and coworkers’ [23] work showed some important directions on the intercalation of water solvated Mg2+ into V2O5 and MoO3 electrodes using aprotic electrolytes with small amounts of water molecules. These studies revealed a screening effect of water on Mg2+ during the intercalation process. Later, many researchers investigated the intercalation behavior of polyvalent ions in various electrode materials, including aerogels [23,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40]. In 1998, for the first time, Le et al. [29] investigated the intercalation of Al3+ and Mg2+ in V2O5 aerogels, and they also reported the advantage of water molecules in the V2O5 aerogel structures providing steric hindrance effect on intercalating Mg2+ and thereby aiding in a good reversibility of multivalent ion insertion into V2O5 aerogels. Following this work, many researchers studied the intercalation of Mg2+ into the V2O5 aerogels and their composites [29,30,31,32,33]. In 2000, it was Aurbach’s work [41] that further optimistically directed the feasibility of multivalent intercalation based Mg-ion battery technology using ether electrolytes. Unlike Li and Na, Mg can be easily used as an anode in Mg-ion batteries because of less reactiveness in the ambient atmosphere, and absence of dendritic growth issues during electrodeposition. In addition, Mg is very abundant, inexpensive and offers low standard electrode potentials along with a large theoretical capacity, see Table 1. Similarly, the other multivalent metals (e.g., Al, Ca, Y, Ni, and Zn etc.) also offer several advantages in terms of ease of handling, abundance, low cost, high storage capacity and energy density (see Table 1), and many of these could be used as anodes in aqueous electrolytes, but they are all restricted by limited choice of cathode and electrolyte materials [15,16,42,43].
The electrolyte challenges are magnified for multivalent batteries, and their choice is very critical in terms of high ion mobility and facile (de)solvation of the ions at the electrode interfaces [18,44]. The desolvation energy can be a measure of the energy required to detach the cation from its solvent solvation shell. For example, the passive layer of solid-electrolyte interface formed between the electrolyte and the electrodes reduces the extent of diffusion of alkaline earth metal ions, unlike in Li-ion batteries where only electrons are hindered and not the Li-ions [18]. As explained above, the high charge density of Mg-ion contributes to a larger desolvation energy and thereby impede its diffusion into the electrode at the interface. Thus, the nature and interaction of multivalent cation with the solvents and counter anions are very critical in multivalent electrolytes. The larger size of Ca2+ with reduced charge density could help in easy diffusion of Ca2+ into the electrodes, but lack of suitable electrolytes, less capacity and reversibility issues make it less attractive. The multivalent salts are also not very soluble in well studied organic solvents, and some of them could be very corrosive [18]. Thus, the advancement of multivalent batteries is very dependent on the discovery of both high voltage cathode materials and electrolytes, the electrode-electrolyte interface reactions, and the diffusion of multivalent ions.
The common approaches to mitigating the interface and solid state diffusion issues of multivalent ions include nano sizing of the electrode materials to shorten the diffusion distances, application of electrode materials with large tunnel structures or interlayer spacing, and partial shielding of the multivalent ions with polar molecules (e.g., water). The electrodes with larger spacing will help minimize the steric hindrance effects [19]. The nanostructures of electrodes will also reduce the impact of structural distortions during intercalation and de-intercalation of the multivalent ions. However, finding a suitable organic solvent with more solubility of multivalent salts, and achieving a good reversibility are yet challenging in many cases. In addition, many of these organic solvents are very sensitive to oxygen and moisture, and are very flammable and toxic as well. The safety issues are a major concern with the organic solvents as overcharging and heating could lead to their evaporation and result in explosion of the batteries. There are many accidents reported in the recent past related to these phenomena [45,46,47]. The best way to deal with such problems is replacing the organic electrolyte with an aqueous electrolyte, which also provides the advantage of being abundant, low cost, and environmentally benign [48,49]. In 1994, Dahn et al. [50] used aqueous electrolyte for Li-ion batteries. Following this paper, aqueous electrolytes were used in many other batteries [16,17,18,19,20,33,43,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77]. In 2012, a rechargeable multivalent Al-ion battery with aqueous electrolyte was proposed as a promising candidate for high energy storage to compete with the Li-ion batteries [51]. However, it should be noted that the intercalation reactions are usually very complicated in aqueous electrolytes. There could be different side reactions, such as co-intercalation of proton into the electrode materials along with the intercalation of multivalent ions, reaction of electrode materials with water or oxygen, hydrogen/oxygen evolution reactions, and the dissolution of electrode materials in water depending on the pH. The proton co-intercalation could happen in the positive electrode materials, and it usually depends on the crystal structure of the electrodes and pH of the electrolyte. For example, spinel Li1−xMn2O4 and olivine Li1−xFePO4 do not encounter such proton insertion, whereas delithiated layered Li1−xCoO2 and Li1−xNi1/3Mn1/3Co1/3O2 show a significant concentration of protons in the lattice during deep lithium extraction with a low pH or more acidic electrolyte [68,69]. Deep extraction of Li results in lower oxidation state of transition metals, which is possibly compensated with exchange of protons from the reaction medium, i.e., electrolyte. Therefore, control of pH and corresponding voltage window selection are very critical [70]. Importantly, the voltage window of the batteries should also be well controlled as a function of pH to avoid H2/O2 evolution reactions, and this in turn could influence the capacity of the electrode materials. For example, the extent of Li-ion extraction is affected by pH of the electrolyte and corresponding voltage window in the case of LiMn2O4, whereas it has less effect in the case of LiFePO4 in the range of 7–14 [71]. Another important fact is the interaction of the electrode with water, which should not be soluble in water. For example, electrode materials of VO2, LiV3O8 and LiV2O5 with nanostructures or large surface area are not a good choice in aqueous electrolytes [71]. It should also be noted that some of the electrode materials decompose in strong alkaline solutions and it needs to be prevented through the application of appropriate coating materials, for example carbon based coatings [72].
The current research status of aqueous multivalent batteries indicates positive future prospects along with a huge requirement for further discoveries and developments of new materials and chemistries in order to extend their implementation to practical uses. Thus realizing their future potentials, here we provide a brief overview on the research progress of aqueous multivalent intercalation batteries and the challenges encountered.

3. Literature Review on Multivalent Aqueous Batteries

3.1. Al–Ion Batteries

Although Al3+ is smaller than Li+ in the unsolvated state, its strongest electrostatic bonding nature with the host electrode materials, similar to many other di- and tri-valent ions, usually results in slower diffusion kinetics within the electrodes. Despite this, it has been found to successfully intercalate and deintercalate in certain compounds exhibiting good electrochemical characteristics for battery applications. Following are the details of compounds explored for Al-ion battery cathode applications with aqueous electrolytes.
  • TiO2
In 2012, for the first time, Liu et al. [51] demonstrated storage of Al3+ in anatase TiO2 nanotube array (NTA) structures in aqueous AlCl3 electrolyte. The insertion of Al3+ into NTA resulted in the reduction of Ti4+ to Ti3+/Ti2+, but the extraction process oxidized only Ti3+ back into Ti4+ with an irreversibility in the oxidation of Ti2+ [56]. Thus, the fundamental reaction that helped in storing Al3+ in TiO2 was the redox reaction pair of Ti4+/Ti3+. In their studies, the nanostructures of TiO2 with a large surface area on a Ti substrate facilitated a good electrode/electrolyte contact and thereby a fast diffusion pathway for Al3+ into the anatase tubes. A maximum discharge capacity of 75 mAh/g was obtained. The cyclic voltammetry (CV) studies showed a clear redox couple at −1.26 and −0.84 V (vs. SCE) for Al3+ insertion and extraction, respectively. In these electrodes, a high over potential of −1.43 V (vs. SCE) for hydrogen evolution was attributed to a strong solvation of Al3+ in the aqueous electrolytes. It was also determined that the insertion and extraction of Li+ and Mg2+ was weaker for the same aqueous electrolyte, which supported the advantage of smaller Al3+ size compared to the Mg2+ and Li+ for a stronger reversibility of Al3+ insertion and extraction. These studies also indicated a predominant solid phase diffusion reaction for Al3+ insertion in the anatase TiO2.
Similarly, Liu et al. [54] also reported a promising performance of anatase TiO2 NTA in another study. They evaluated the performance of NTA of TiO2 in a series of electrolytes 0.50 M Al2(SO4)3, 1.00 M AlCl3, and two groups of mixed solutions (a) 0.25 M Al2(SO4)3 with different concentrations of NaCl solution; (b) 1.50 M NaCl mixed with different concentrations of Al2(SO4)3 solution, in order to understand the effect of chloride (Cl) ions in the insertion process of Al3+ into the host structures. They obtained a discharge capacity of 74.8 mAh/g at a current density of 4 mA/cm2 without altering the morphology and crystal structure of NTA. This superior performance was attributed to the small radius of Al3+ (53.5 pm vs. 76 pm of Li+) and presence of Cl in the electrolyte. The CV studies of NTA showed no redox couple in Al2(SO4)3 electrolyte, whereas the redox peaks were around −1.2 and −1.0 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) in AlCl3 electrolyte. Further investigations in a series of electrolytes with varying concentrations of NaCl in Al2(SO4)3 showed an increase in the peak currents of redox couples and thereby supported the positive contribution of Cl in the insertion and extraction process of Al3+. These authors inferred a possible assistance of Cl in the insertion of Al3+ into the interstitial sites of TiO2 lattice, however the exact role was not presented and needed further investigation.
Following these articles, He et al. [53] also reported a similar investigation on nano leave structures of anatase TiO2 for Al-ion battery electrode applications. In their studies, the electrochemical performance of TiO2 nano leaves were investigated in Al(NO3)3 aqueous solution. The TiO2 nano leaves were found to facilitate Al3+ diffusion and electronic transport very easily without much of volumetric changes. As a result, a high aluminum storage with a capacity of 278 mAh/g at a current density of 0.05 A/g was reported. They also showed excellent cycling stability with a capacity of 141.3 mAh/g at a current density of 2.0 A/g, and such superior characteristics were ascribed to the ordered nanoparticles in the electrodes with improved intercalation and interfacial storage capacities. The lower polarization effects with a smaller potential drops or smaller hysteresis between the charge and discharge voltages indicate very low over-potentials for either insertion or extraction of Al3+ into the electrodes, and thereby helped in achieving enhanced performance. Similar behavior was also observed by Cui et al. [43] during insertion of Al3+ and many other trivalent ions into open frame structured Copper Hexacyanoferrate (CuHCF), where insertion of trivalent ions was associated with lower hysteresis between the charge-discharge curves. He et al. [53] has also confirmed interfacial storage of Al3+ in the nanoparticles of electrodes of anatase TiO2, unlike the usual battery electrodes which tend to form resistive solid electrolyte interfaces and result in a reduced capacity. Their observations were also supported without decomposition of the electrolyte with a high surface area of nano leave morphology providing the interfacial storage for Al3+.
  • Copper Hexacyanoferrate (CuHCF)
The electrode materials, such as CuHCF, with Prussian Blue analogues (PBA) structures showed a very good potential for multivalent ion insertion/de-insertion characteristics. The PBAs with a generic formula of AxPR(CN)6 contain P and R ions, which are separated and bonded by CN ligands forming a face-centered cubic structure with open framework as shown in Figure 1, and the large interstitial A sites are where the insertion of guest ions is possible. PBA’s electrochemical properties have been extensively studied for hydrogen storage, battery electrodes and electrochromic applications [57,58,78,79,80,81,82]. It has been recently demonstrated that copper and nickel hexacyanoferrates with PBA structure can electrochemically insert ions in aqueous solutions [57,58]. The research conducted by Wessells et al. [57,58], Cui et al. [43] and Steingart et al. [63] indicate that the capacity of CuHCF is insensitive to the ionic valency of the intercalating species, provided the concentration of the intercalating ions in the electrolyte is more than the moles of active material, and this is so because the number of ions inserted in the CuHCF depends on balancing of charge with the number of available Fe2+ in the crystal structure, and thereby limit the cell capacity.
In 2014, Liu et al. [52] investigated the storage of trivalent Al-ions in CuHCF for the cathode applications using a 0.5 M Al2(SO4)3 aqueous electrolyte. The theoretical specific capacity of CuHCF was predicted to be around 58.9 mAh/g based on the molecular weight of the compound, however the electrochemical measurements by Liu et al. [52] showed a specific capacity around 62.9 mAh/g at a current density of 50 mA/g, and it decreased to 46.9 mAh/g at a current density of 400 mA/g with a retention of 74.6% of the starting capacity. This superior performance was attributed to the shielding effect of zeolitic water on the motion of Al3+ in the host crystal structure with steric hindrance effects. The cyclic charge–discharge tests also showed a decent capacity up to 22.5 mAh/g after 1000 cycles. These studies clearly presented the CuHCF as another potential cathode material for Al-ion batteries [52].
In another study by Cui et al. [43], CuHCF was proved to be capable of reversibly intercalating many trivalent and divalent ions in the aqueous electrolytes. Their galvanostatic charge-discharge tests showed a lower voltage hysteresis for insertion of trivalent ions compared to the divalent ions and they attributed it to high level hydration of trivalent ions, which was also confirmed through structural analysis via Rietveld refinement. Interestingly, they also observed a negligible impact of insertion of ions with varying oxidation states into the CuHCF because of a high degree of screening effect by water molecules in the hydration shell or in the crystal structures minimizing the electrostatic interaction between the insertion ion and the host ions of CuHCF. In addition, the intercalation of multivalent ions was observed to show multiple cathodic and anodic peaks at distinct voltages, representing possible insertion/de-insertion of ions into/from multiple distinct crystallographic sites, suggesting the role of ferricyanide vacancies, which was also confirmed by Reitvald refinement. These vacancies are expected to help in providing diffusion pathways facilitating the migration of multivalent ions as well as charge redistribution to stabilize the crystal structure of CuHCF or PBA phases. Overall, this research suggested a critical role of vacancies and screening effect of water molecules on the reversible insertion of multivalent ions, which make PBA materials suitable electrode materials for multivalent batteries with their remarkable electrochemical characteristics.

3.2. Zn–Ion Batteries

Among several multivalent batteries, Zn-ion intercalation batteries have gained a considerable attention to replace conventional Li-ion batteries for large scale applications. The electrodes used for Zn-ion batteries are environmentally very benign and they can be manufactured very economically. The electrolytes are also very simple in chemistry [17,55]. There have been growing efforts toward developing high energy density intercalation batteries based on Zn-ion chemistries, and so far multiple materials have been investigated for cathode applications, which are discussed below along with the details of mechanisms and challenges.
  • α-MnO2
Although some types of MnO2 are currently being used in commercial alkaline batteries, they are gaining increased attention as possible electrodes for Zn-ion intercalation batteries also. The crystal structure of α-MnO2 has a tunnel structure as shown in Figure 2 (cryptomelane), and insertion of alkali, alkaline earth and post transition metals into these tunnel structures has been a long time research focus. Some of the important qualities of α-MnO2 in intercalation batteries include large discharge capacities with a practical discharge potential of 1.3 V (vs. Zn/Zn2+) at a moderate currents, and an energy density of 225 Wh/kg in 1 M aqueous ZnSO4 electrolyte. However, these intercalation batteries suffer from capacity fading in long term cycling with poor performance at high current rates [17,55].
Xu et al. [55] reported a reversible intercalation of Zn2+ into the tunnel structures of α-MnO2 resulting in a specific capacity of 210 mAh/g, which is relatively very large compared to the capacity delivered by Zn/MnO2 alkaline batteries (125 mAh/g). At a slow current rate of C/20, they exhibited a capacity retention up to 30 cycles with a very high columbic efficiency. Some of the most appealing points of these batteries include use of non-toxic, non-corrosive, and low-cost mild electrolytes with abundant raw materials [55]. In another study, Lee et al. [17] investigated the mechanism for intercalation of Zn2+ into α-MnO2 nano rods in order to understand the decay in their intercalation performance. This work discovered a reversible phase transition of α-MnO2 structures into a layered triclinic Zn-birnessite, as shown in Figure 2. The interaction of Zn2+ with the tunnel structures of α-MnO2 was found to be quite strong because of large electrostatic forces compared to Li+ and Na+, and it has been observed to change the oxidation state of Mn upon intercalating into the tunnel structures. Further investigation through X-ray near edge absorption structure (XANES) studies revealed the dissolution of unstable Mn3+ from the walls of the tunnels into the electrolyte causing a phase transition from the tunneled to layered structure. Interestingly, the deposition of Mn on Zn anode was not observed, and rather the Mn ions were observed to reversibly insert back into the layer structures of Zn-birnessite during the charging process. With increased number of cycles, electrodes turned into amorphous phase due to excessive stresses generated during the phase transitions of α-MnO2 and Zn-birnessite, and it caused the capacity to fade. However, Lee et al. [17] did not propose any alternatives to improve the cycling behavior of α-MnO2.
Recently in 2015, Xu et al. [59] also worked on developing Zn-ion intercalation batteries while developing Ni-ion batteries. They conducted both theoretical modeling and experimental work based on supercapacitor’s research with an inspiration of increasing capacitance and charge rate capability of batteries while increasing the valence of ions in the electrolyte. Their theoretical calculations predicted a thermodynamically favorable insertion of Zn2+ into different lattice sites of the tunnel structure of α-MnO2 with a binding energy ranging from −1.05 to −2.09 eV. Their experimental work also supported the theoretical modeling studies and yielded a specific capacity around 220 mAh/g. However, it should be noted that they used a 20 wt % of graphene as an active ingredient along with 70 wt % of α-MnO2 in their electrodes, unlike the earlier work on α-MnO2 in references [17] and [55], and it helped not only in obtaining a slightly higher capacity but also a higher energy density of 320 Wh/kg.
  • λ–MnO2
In an interesting study by Yuan et al. [20], λ-MnO2 was synthesized by removing Li from LiMn2O4 via selective acid leaching process. They investigated the electrochemical performance in an aqueous ZnSO4 electrolyte for Zn-ion intercalation battery electrode applications. The oxidation and reduction reactions were determined to correspond to the transformation of Mn3+/Mn4+, and Mn4+/Mn3+, respectively, and they showed an initial discharge capacity of 442.6 mAh/g with a coulombic efficiency of nearly 100%, however, at a current density of 408 mA/g, the capacity dropped to 33.8 mAh/g [20].
  • Todorokite
Todorokite is a type of manganese oxide (MnO2) mineral with a chemical composition of Mg1.8Mn6O12 4.8 H2O consisting 1-dimensional 3 × 3 tunnel structure along the b-axis, see Figure 3 [83].
Many cations can intercalate into this large tunnel and stabilize the whole structure, including alkali, alkaline-earth, transition-metal ions, post-transition metals and water molecules [19]. The tunnel structures of Todorokite are bigger than the tunnels of α-MnO2 and facilitate easy diffusion of Zn2+. In addition, the crystallographic water inside the tunnels is expected to provide a partial shielding effect on Zn2+ from the walls of the tunnels, and thereby reduce the electrostatic interactions and bonding of Zn2+. In 2013, Lee et al. [19] studied the intercalation of Zn2+ into a synthetic Todorokite using a 1 M ZnSO4 aqueous electrolyte with Zn metal anode. The electrochemical characterization showed a specific capacity close to the theoretical value of 99 mAh/g with a cycle stability up to 50 cycles. However, the capacity of Todorokite was less than half of the capacity of α-MnO2 (210 mAh/g) [55], and it was attributed to the preexistence of Mg2+ in the tunnel structures. The pre-intercalated Mg2+ is expected to reduce the average oxidation state (AOS) of Mn to 3.4 compared 3.67 in α-MnO2. Therefore, a lower AOS of Mn leads to a lower amount of Zn2+ intercalation into Todorokite compared to the α-MnO2 and hence the lower specific capacity. In the second cycle of discharge, the same Todorokite was observed to show a higher capacity of 108 mAh/g because of partial removal of pre-intercalated Mg2+. Although, the discharge capacity of Todorokite was lower than α-MnO2, the capacity retention at high current rates was better, and it was credited to the large 3 × 3 tunnel structures and partial shielding effect of crystallographic water in Todorokite tunnels [53].
  • Zinc Hexacyanoferrate (ZnHCF)
Leyuan Zhang et al. [60] investigated the electrochemical insertion characteristics of Zn2+ into rhombohedral structured ZnHCF in aqueous electrolytes along with other monovalent cations (K+ and Na+). The electrochemical characterization with a metallic Zn anode and aqueous ZnSO4 electrolyte in a half cell configuration yielded a capacity of 64.4 mAh/g (at 5C) and 73.7 mAh/g (at 1C). In contrast, a full cell configuration of Zn anode against ZnHCF intercalated at a voltage of 1.7 V (vs. Zn/Zn2+) exhibiting a capacity of 65.4 mAh/g, and this intercalation voltage was reported to be one of the highest voltages for aqueous Zn-ion batteries. The specific energy density of these full cells was determined to be 100 Wh/kg based on the total mass of the active electrode materials. The cyclability studies also yielded a good performance with a retention up to 76% of initial capacity after 100 cycles, and this research certainly indicated the advantage of ZnHCF electrodes with high voltage for Zn-ion battery applications. However, authors did not provide the details of pH of the electrolyte and possible reasons for high voltage of the full cell configuration.
  • Copper Hexacyanoferrate (CuHCF)
In 2013, Jia et al. [61] studied the electrochemical intercalation of Zn2+ into CuHCF in aqueous ZnSO4 electrolyte. They demonstrated a successful reversibility of intercalation of Zn2+ with a specific capacity around 56 mAh/g. Most importantly, their CV studies showed a linear relationship between the peak current densities and the square root of scan rates employed indicating a solid-phase diffusion process. Consequently, it was determined that the diffusion of Zn2+ into CuHCF was harder than the extraction process using the scan rate and current density relationships in anodic and cathodic scans, which correspondingly exhibited a two stage discharge process at two different voltages compared to a single stage charging process in the galvanostatic charge-discharge tests. The authors attributed the successful insertion and extraction of Zn2+ into CuHCF to the small radius steric effect of Zn2+. In 2014, Trócoli and La Mantia [62] are the first to report a high voltage aqueous electrolyte battery using CuHCF. They conducted research on developing a Zn-ion battery with a 1.73 V using metallic Zn anode in a ZnSO4 electrolyte in three electrode configuration (Ag/AgCl–reference). During their electrochemical characterization, they made sure to maintain the pH of electrolyte around 6 in order to avoid passivation of Zn anode. The galvanostatic cycles for the positive (CuHCF) and negative (Zn) electrodes (at 1C) exhibited a cell capacity of 60 mAh/g. They observed a reduction potential for CuHCF around 0.9 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) and the oxidation potential for Zn anode around −0.83 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) and thereby they obtained a full potential of 1.73 V (vs. Zn/Zn2+) for the cell between CuHCF and Zn. However, testing of full cells was never performed by these authors. The cyclability data showed a very good capacity retention up to 96.3% of initial capacity after 100 cycles. They claim that the specific energy (56.3 Wh/kg) and specific power (794.3 W/kg) of their cells were close to the performance of Li4Ti5O12 and LiFePO4 electrodes in organic electrolytes at 10C.
In another recent study by Cui et al. [43] the divalent ion insertion, including Zn2+, showed reversibility in CuHCF but their capacity faded over a long period of cycling. The intercalation of Zn2+ exhibited a starting specific capacity around 40 mAh/g and it reduced to 20 mAh/g (at 5C), and this was attributed to possible swapping of Zn2+ ions with the metal ions of CuHCF frame work, but it was very inconclusive. The CV studies showed multiple cathodic and anodic peaks suggesting the assistance of ferricyanide vacancies during the diffusion process, which was also confirmed through the crystal structure analysis using Reitvald refinement. In addition, presence of water molecules in the CuHCF frame work were also reported to assist in the diffusion of multivalent ions in CuHCF crystal through shielding or steric hindrance effect. However, the reasons for decay in capacity with insertion of Zn2+ was not examined in detail by Cui et al. [43]. Steingart et al. [63] investigated this capacity decay phenomenon while comparing the electrochemical characteristics obtained using an aqueous Na2SO4 electrolyte. In this work CuHCF was cycled against hyper-dendritic zinc (HD Zn) anode in an acidic Na2SO4 solution. With Na+ as the primary ion for charge transport, a capacity retention of 90% (83)% after 300 (500) cycles at 5C was achieved, which was five times larger than any other PBA-Zn systems reported above. The maximum specific capacity of CuHCF was found to be 60 mAh/g irrespective of insertion of Zn2+ or Na+. But its rapid decay in capacity against Zn2+ suggested a possible irreversible damage of the crystal structure of CuHCF during the rapid removal and insertion of Zn2+. X-ray photo spectroscopy results showed Zn 2p peaks both in charged and discharged electrodes of CuHCF tested against Zn anode indicating accumulation of Zn in the CuHCF crystal, which corroborated with the authors assertion. They also observed a decrease in capacity with increasing storage time due to diffusion of Zn into the CuHCF crystal structure. Their investigation of electrochemical characteristics using HD Zn provided insights into the kinetics of Zn2+ diffusion. The large surface area of HD Zn lowers the over-potential and helps faster kinetics during the charge/discharge steps. They also showed more retention of capacity with HD Zn compared to the regular planar sheet electrode of Zn, and it could be because of the initial dendritic structure that takes time to densify before it starts to behave like a planar Zn sheet and also helps in reduction of unwanted volume expansion and formation of sharp structures avoiding soft shorts.

3.3. Ni-Ion Batteries

  • α-MnO2
As earlier explained in Zn-ion batteries, the research on Ni-ion batteries was pursued by Xu et al. [59] in 2015 with an inspiration from supercapacitor research. They argue that the insertion of multivalent ions into certain types of host materials with large tunnel structures is easier both thermodynamically and kinetically, which is against the usual notion of slower kinetics for multivalent insertion into the host materials compared to the univalent ions. Their theoretical modeling and experimental research focused on using α-MnO2 as a cathode for Ni-ion batteries. The modeling studies showed a favorable insertion of Ni2+ into different lattice sites of tunnel structure in α-MnO2 with binding energies ranging from −2.92 to −5.54 eV. The experimental investigations were carried out using an aqueous NiSO4 electrolyte that was very suitable for reversible deposition of Ni at a concentration of 1 M, and obtained a capacity of 298 mAh/g (at 200 mA/g) at an average voltage of 0.85 V (vs. Ni/Ni2+) for 2200 cycles [59]. This research has certainly opened the doors for exploring different multivalent ion batteries using a simple analogy of supercapacitors.
  • Copper Hexacyanoferrate (CuHCF)
Yi Cui and coworker’s [43] studies on intercalation of Ni2+ into CuHCF yielded a capacity around 20 mAh/g in the beginning, however it reduced to 10 mAh/g after 2000 cycles while testing at a rate of 5C. The reasons for decay in capacity and poor columbic efficiency were not conclusively determined in this work, however the authors speculated a possible swapping of metal ions of CuHCF frame work with the insertion ions. But the presence of multiple anodic and cathodic peaks represented possible insertion of guest ions into ferricyanide vacancies. They also confirmed the aiding role of ferricyanide vacancies and shielding effect of water molecules of CuHCF in the rapid kinetics of diffusion of guest ions, including Ni2+.

3.4. Mg–Ion Batteries

Despite the similarities of Mg and Li insertion into the hosts, most of the intercalation compounds that are suitable for electrode materials for Li-ion battery systems demonstrate a very poor chemical performance with Mg ions. Following are some of the current issues with Mg-ion batteries: (1) slow diffusion of Mg ions in the solids because of strong electrostatic interactions with the host structures; (2) growth of an insulating passivating surface film on the Mg-metal anode; (3) narrow electrical window of electrolytes used for the Mg-ion electrochemical activity; and (4) relatively low specific energy of the Mg-ion battery as compared to lithium [49]. Mg is a very active metal and is always covered with surface films, which usually consist of oxides, halides, hydroxides, and carbonates depending on the surrounding atmospheric conditions, solvents and gases. In addition, the passivation of Mg electrodes was observed to be quite rapid even with a small amount of moisture or water in the electrolytes [84]. However, the Mg electrodes are highly reversible only in Grignard reagents, where they can be dissolved and deposited using Grignard reagent based electrolytes, and in all other cases they tend to form passivating films with the compounds listed above. These passivating films prevent a continuous or spontaneous reactions between the active Mg and the electrolyte, and unfortunately they hamper the diffusion of Mg2+ unlike in Li-ion batteries, where the surface films formed on Li are usually Li-ion conducting in most of the commonly used electrolyte solutions [85]. In order to overcome these problems, use of acidic species in the electrolytes is suggested to help breakdown the passivating film and thereby to facilitate the interactions between Mg anodes and the electrolytes. In another approach, anodic polarization could also be implemented to cause the rupture of passivating films [85]. In aqueous electrolytes, the alloys of Mg could also be implemented as anodes for Mg-ion battery applications [20].
Recently, the electrodes of Chevrel phases (MgxMo6T8, T = S, Se) [41,86] and dichalcogenides (MoS2, WSe2) [87,88,89] were determined to have weak electrostatic interactions between Mg2+ and their anionic frameworks with moderate polarities. However, these anions with moderate polarities result in weak bond strength between the transition metals and surrounding anions leading to lower redox potentials of the transition metals, and thereby lower electrode potentials. Therefore, achieving both high voltages and efficient kinetics is also nontrivial for Mg-ion battery cathode materials. In addition, bivalency of Mg2+ imposes a higher energy penalty on desolvation at the electrode-electrolyte interface. There is plenty of research done on several cathode materials for Mg-ion batteries using non-aqueous electrolytes and their review can be found in [90], however using aqueous electrolytes more research is yet to be done. Despite many complexities and challenges, there are yet multiple electrode materials researchers have been able to investigate for their electrochemical characteristics. The subsections below focus on the electrode materials studied for Mg-ion battery applications using aqueous electrolytes and their electrochemical characteristics.
  • λ-MnO2 /Spinel Mn2O4
Among many materials that have been investigated, MnO2 has attracted much attention due to its tunnel structure, which can accommodate a large range of metal ions with different valences. MnO2 with various crystal structures, Hollandite, octahedral molecular sieve structure, and Birnessite (layered), Hollandite with large tunnels that are capable of accommodating various cations [91] demonstrated the highest possible capacity, but with a significant voltage hysteresis and slower Mg2+ diffusion kinetics in non-aqueous electrolytes [90]. Recently, it was experimentally [92] and theoretically [93] studied and showed to convert into amorphous phase upon insertion of Mg2+ in contrary to the regular intercalation phenomenon. Unfortunately, to confirm some of these observations in aqueous electrolytes, there is a lack of literature. Most of the aqueous electrolyte work was pursued on spinel structured compounds, which are discussed in detail below.
In 2014, Yuan et al. [20] reported the intercalation of Mg ions into λ–MnO2 that was prepared via acid leaching of LiMn2O4. This study focused on testing of λ–MnO2 in four different aqueous electrolytes ZnSO4, MgSO4, Mg(NO3)2 and MgCl2 and determined that λ–MnO2 was an ideal battery material for polyvalent cations (Mg2+, Zn2+) to intercalate/deintercalate. Mg2+ showed a better intercalation capability compared to Zn2+ as it has smaller size. Among all the electrolytes tested, λ–MnO2 performed the best in MgCl2 electrolyte showing a specific capacity of 400 mAh/g at a current density of 13.6 mA/g [20]. However, it reduced to 90.9, 93.2 and 155.6 mAh/g after the first 50 cycles in MgSO4, Mg(NO3)2 and MgCl2 electrolytes, respectively. Interestingly theses capacities remained constant up to 300 cycles. The λ–MnO2 electrode was also tested in MgCl2 electrolyte with different concentrations (0.5, 1, 3 M) and current densities (13.6, 27.2, 68, 136, 408 mA/g). It exhibited the largest discharge capacity at 0.5 M concentration and a poor performance at 3 M. The charge process and chlorine evolution reactions were observed to compete with each other, and limit the de-intercalation of Mg2+ from the λ–MnO2 electrode depending on the electrolyte concentration. The CV investigations revealed a preference for lower concentration of MgCl2 because of a large potential difference between the voltages required for chlorine evolution and the oxidation of the electrode, which facilitates the full deintercalation of Mg2+ before the evolution of chlorine starts.
In another study, Nupur and Munichandraiah [64] prepared MgMn2O4 in an aqueous Mg(NO3)2 electrolyte by electrochemically removing Li from LiMn2O4 using cyclic voltammetry. The average oxidation state of Mn was reduced to +3 with the additional charge of +2 of Mg in MgMn2O4. Later they tested these MgMn2O4 electrodes for charge-discharge cycling using aqueous Mg(NO3)2 and Mg(ClO4)2 electrolytes and obtained similar results. Galvanostatic charge–discharge cycling clearly indicated a good electrochemical reversibility of MgMn2O4 structures with λ-MnO2. The discharge cycles showed a maximum capacity of 42 mAh/g in the first cycle, which eventually reduced to ~35 mAh/g after 20 cycles. In a similar study to above, Kim et al. [66] also prepared a spinel Mn2O4 by de-lithiating LiMn2O4 in two stages, initially chemically and then following electrochemically in an aqueous Mg(NO3)2 solution. These authors have confirmed the formation of spinel Mn2O4 phase through crystallography and electron microscopy examination. During their electrochemical de-lithiation of spinel Mn2O4 phase, no cointercalation of water was confirmed in the electrode, as it would be usually expected from the small space available in the 3D spinel structures. The authors hypothesize that no-participation of water during de-lithiation should also be an indication for no interaction or participation of water in non-aqueous electrolytes during the electrochemical tests. Thus, it was tested with a fully delithiated Mn2O4 electrode assembled in a three electrode cell with Mg(TFSI)2 in dyglime or propylene carbonate electrolytes, and the cells showed a high voltage hysteresis with a lower degree of intercalation of Mg2+ into Mn2O4 compared to the aqueous electrolytes indicating considerable kinetic barriers in non-aqueous electrolytes.
  • MnO2 Birnessite
Nam et al. [65] did some very interesting studies to understand the electrostatic shielding behavior and structural stability provided by water molecules in a spinel structured Mn3O4 as well as converted Birnessite MnO2 electrodes. Their efforts initially focused on converting spinel Mn3O4 into Birnessite MnO2 structure by galvanostatically cycling it for 50 cycles in an aqueous 1 M MgSO4 electrolyte, which showed an increasing capacity up to 170 mAh/g because of co-intercalation of water into the electrode, and it resulted in an aqueous activated lamellar structured electrode turning from spinel Mn3O4 to Birnessite MnO2, which is quite contrasting to the studies conducted by Chunjoong Kim et al. [66] in spinel structures. Thus water activated electrode was then examined in non-aqueous electrolytes with and without addition of water. Their experiments revealed that the water in the host, i.e., Birnessite MnO2, called crystal water, effectively screened the electrostatic interactions between Mg2+ and the host anions and thereby enhanced the electrochemical activity of Birnessite MnO2. Addition of water to the non-aqueous electrolyte solutions also allowed for hydration of Mg2+ at the surface of the electrodes and facilitated an easy intercalation of Mg2+ ions with lowered desolvation energy penalty at the electrode–electrolyte interface. The hydration of Mg2+ suppresses the coulombic repulsion between Mg2+ ions and the electrode surface and thereby assists in easy diffusion of Mg2+ into the electrode at the interface. In the case of pure non-aqueous electrolyte solution (Mg(ClO4)2 in acetonitrile), Birnessite MnO2 displayed a reversible capacity of only 56.8 mAh/g, however with increasing the water content it increased up to 230 mAh/g at a voltage of 2.8 V (vs. Mg/Mg2+) for a 10 M concentration of water in the electrolyte. It retained up to 80% of the initial capacity, i.e., 183.2 mAh/g after 30 cycles at 100 mA/g. At different current densities of 200, 500, 1000, and 2000 mA/g the capacity retention was around 93.8%, 74.6%, 59.9% and 48.6% of initial capacity, respectively. These Birnessite MnO2 electrodes showed far better cycling stability in the water added non-aqueous electrolyte as opposed to pure non-aqueous electrolyte. These studies conveyed that a vast number of hydrated compounds that can effectively shield the electrostatic interaction between Mg2+ ions and the anionic framework of inorganic hosts may be considered as good candidates for Mg-ion battery cathodes.
  • Nickel Hexacyanoferrate (NiHCF)
Nickel hexacyanoferrate (NiHCF) was tested for Mg-ion batteries by Wang et al. [15]. They have used nanoparticles of NiHCF synthesized via co-precipitation method, and their electrochemical performance was evaluated in aqueous 1 M Mg(NO3)2 electrolyte (pH = 2) in a three electrode configuration with Ag/AgCl reference electrode, and a platinum counter electrode. However, for cyclability measurements, an activated carbon counter electrode was used. The initial capacity of NiHCF was ~52 mAh/g, but it decayed and stabilized at 65% of its initial capacity after 2000 cycles when it was tested at a rate of 5C, and the fading capacity was attributed to partial solubility of NiHCF in the electrolyte. The discharge processes of the electrodes were shown to be due to two phase reactions, which are however not known at this stage. The open framework crystal structure of NiHCF seemed to facilitate the high rate insertion of Mg2+ ions to produce exceptional cycle life and coulombic energy efficiencies. In addition, the size of nanoparticles, presence of hydrated ions in the crystal structure, and high ionic conductivity of NiHCF also helped in rapid kinetics and high rate capacities of the electrodes [15].
  • V2O5 Xerogels
V2O5 xerogel are very interesting materials for intercalation of ions because of their high surface area, short distances, and large interlayer spacing with water molecules. They resemble lamellar ordering with water molecules intercalated between the layers [94], and these water molecules could provide steric hindrance effect on the diffusion of multivalent ions. There is plethora of literature on intercalation characteristics of uni and multivalent ions into V2O5 xerogels (in non-aqueous electrolytes) available in the reference [94]. In 2010, for the first time, Stojkovic et al. [32] investigated the insertion of Mg2+ into V2O5 xerogels in aqueous Mg(NO3)2 electrolytes. In their research, they studied electrochemical characteristics of V2O5 xerogels and their composites with carbon and then compared with crystalline V2O5 [67]. Their charge-discharge cycling of V2O5 xerogels yielded a higher capacity of 50 mAh/g compared to the capacity of 30 mAh/g for the crystalline V2O5 [67]. The lower capacity of V2O5 was attributed to its insulating nature and slow diffusion kinetics of Mg2+ in V2O5. Recent work by Ceder et al. [95] also indicated slow diffusion kinetics in V2O5 electrodes, especially in the stable α-V2O5 phase, which is associated with a conversion of fully demagnesiated α-V2O5 into a coexisting two-phase structure with fully magnesiated δ-V2O5 and fully demagnesiated α-V2O5 phases during the discharge process. The experimental investigations by Aurbach et al. [96] also indicated possible multi-stage transformation during the intercalation with high resistivity of V2O5 phase. However, in experimental work, so far α-V2O5 is the only known electrode with reversibility of Mg2+ intercalation with slow diffusion kinetics. All these findings point to inferior quality of V2O5 compared to the xerogel structures of V2O5 for Mg battery electrode applications. Interestingly, addition of carbon seems to enhance the performance of V2O5 xerogels even more [32]. The composites of V2O5 xerogels with 30% carbon yielded even a higher capacity of 107 mAh/g, and this was attributed to more electrical conductivity of the composites with carbon addition, compared to the pure insulating V2O5 xerogels where carbon was added only 10% in their electrode preparation. Similarly, the CV data also exhibited higher peak currents for composite samples compared to the pure xerogels supporting the galvansotatic charge-discharge test data [32].
In another experimental and modeling study by Vujkovic et al. [33], the composites of V2O5 xerogels-Carbon showed more favorable intercalation for Mg2+ compared to the univalent Li+, K+ and Na+ in aqueous electrolytes. Interestingly, the capacity retained was also higher with insertion of Mg2+ into V2O5 xerogels-Carbon composites. The initial specific capacities obtained with insertion of Mg2+, Li+, K+ and Na+ were 102, 85, 85 and 87 mAh/g (at a current density of 1000 mA/g), respectively, and after 10 cycles, the retained capacity was observed to be 80, 42, 40 and 35 mAh/g, respectively. Through CV studies, it was determined that the interlayer site of V2O5 xerogel could be relatively more affordable for Mg2+ compared to the univalent ions, including Li+, although their sizes are comparable. The authors postulated that the insertion of Mg2+ in the interlayer sites of xerogels may not strain the crystal structure as much as the univalent ions do because of possible redistribution of intercalated Mg2+ between two non-equivalent sites, as well as redistribution of charge. They also conducted theoretical modeling studies using density functional theory (DFT) calculations to confirm the experimental observations. According to their DFT calculations, the Mg2+ interacts strongly with oxygen consisting V=O group (without collapsing the structure) compared to the monovalent ions and thereby helps in strengthening of the V–O(3) bonds and more stabilized xerogel structure. In case of univalent ions, the weaker interaction resulted in possible weaker bonding of V–O(3) bonds upon insertion of univalent ions and hence resulted in reduced number of vanadium ions in the crystal structure releasing them to dissolve in the electrolyte. Their modeling studies pointed toward application of smaller cation size to achieve better cyclic stability of the xerogel in aqueous electrolytes. Although, the ionic radii of Li+ (0.76 pm) and Mg2+ (0.72 pm) are very similar but higher charge of Mg2+ was attributed to help in achieving better cyclic stability. These studies certainly provided new insights into storage of multivalent ions in V2O5 xerogel–Carbon composites.

3.5. Other Ions (Ca, Ba, Cu, Sr, Nd, La, Y, Sm, Pb and Ce)

  • Nickel Hexacyanoferrate (NiHCF)
Similar to Mg-ion batteries, NiHCF was also investigated for reversible insertion of other alkaline earth divalent ions, including Ca2+, Sr2+ and Ba2+ by Wang et al. [15]. The aqueous electrolytes were prepared by dissolving appropriate metal nitrates in deionized water, and a 0.1 M concentration was used for Ba2+, and for all other cations the concentration was 1 M. For Ca2+, Sr2+ and Ba2+, the half charge reaction potentials with respect to the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE) were 0.59, 0.63 and 0.64 V, respectively. The NiHCF electrodes were observed to maintain a 53%, 64%, and 93% of their initial capacities after 2000 cycles for Ca2+, Sr2+, and Ba2+, respectively, at a rate of 5C. As explained earlier, the electrode particle size, ionic conductivity, presence of zeolitic water and open crystal structure of the active NiHCF were reasoned to help obtain the high rate capacities and high coulombic efficiencies [15]. These observations certainly indicate the versatile nature of NiHCF with high power capabilities for cathode applications in multivalent aqueous electrolyte intercalation batteries.
  • Copper Hexacyanoferrate (CuHCF)
As described in the section for Al-ion batteries, CuHCF was also investigated for insertion of many other multivalent ions, such as Cu2+, Co2+, Pb2+, Nd3+, La3+, Sm3+, Y3+, and Ce3+ by Yi Cui et al. [43], and their work showed a very good reversibility of intercalation of many of these trivalent metals without much decay in their capacity after several cycles, for example, Y3+ sustained a good cyclability of more than 2000 cycles. The effect of C rate was also observed to be not very substantial in terms of the decay of specific capacity for trivalent ions compared to the divalent ions. Intercalation of Y3+ showed a reduction of capacity from ~70 mAh/g to ~59 mAh/g while increasing the C rate from C/5 to a fifty fold increase, i.e., 10C. The specific capacities of CuHCF with the insertion of Nd3+, La3+, Sm3+, Y3+, and Ce3+ was obtained around 39, 38, 36, 61 and 51 mAh/g, respectively. On the other hand, the divalent ions Cu2+, Co2+ and Pb2+ exhibited capacities around 35, 19 and 57 mAh/g, respectively. Their electrochemical data and crystal structure analysis clearly suggested the role of both ferricyanide vacancies and high degree screening of water molecules (from the crystal structure) in the intercalation of multivalent ions, making CuHCF a very unique electrode material for multivalent ion batteries.

4. Future Directions

Above literature on aqueous batteries certainly sheds light on current progress as well as future potentials and prospects of aqueous battery technologies, including their possible uses for practical applications. However, due attention should be paid to different technical challenges, such as side reactions, co-intercalation of proton into the electrode materials, change of pH of the electrolyte during charge-discharge processes, electrode dissolution, etc., and, certainly, these will not only change the chemistry of aqueous batteries, but also strongly affect their capacity retention and cyclability, as mentioned earlier in the Section 2. The voltage windows for investigation of electrochemical characteristics should be selected depending on the crystal structures of the electrode materials as well as the chemistry of electrolytes employed to avoid dissociation of water as well as deep extraction of intercalating ions (similar to deep delithiation) from the electrode material. At the same time, future research should also focus on the following in order to enhance the capabilities of aqueous battery technologies:
  • Discover and/or develop new cathode materials with high voltages and high capacities.
  • Develop new cathode materials with good reversibility for intercalation and deintercalation of multivalent ions.
  • Improve the performance of currently discovered cathode materials with means of alterations in the electrode chemistries (e.g., doping) and structures, electrolytes, etc.
  • Develop mechanisms to increase over-potentials for hydrogen and oxygen evolution by tailoring the chemistry of water, electrolytes and possibly electrode structures.
  • Develop mechanisms to reduce the solvation energies of multivalent ions.
  • Extend the research to nanostructured and porous cathode materials.
  • Investigate the composite electrode materials in combination with the electrode materials used for supercapacitors.
  • Explore the mechanisms and opportunities to enhance the interfacial capacitance at cathode/electrolyte interfaces.
  • Reduce the polarization issues.


Juan C. Icaza would like to thank the Dept. of Mechanical Engineering at Lamar University for the Doctoral Fellowship.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Chen, J. Recent Progress in Advanced Materials for Lithium Ion Batteries. Materials 2013, 6, 156–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Etacheri, V.; Marom, R.; Elazari, R.; Salitra, G.; Aurbach, D. Challenges in the development of advanced Li-ion batteries: A review. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 3243–3243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Goodenough, J.B.; Park, K.-S. The Li-Ion Rechargeable Battery: A Perspective. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 1167–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Roy, P.; Srivastava, S.K. Nanostructured anode materials for lithium ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 2454–2484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hayner, C.; Zhao, X.; Kung, H. Materials for Rechargeable Lithium-Ion Batteries. Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 2012, 3, 445–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ji, L.; Lin, Z.; Alcoutlabi, M.; Zhang, X. Recent developments in nanostructured anode materials for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 2682–2699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, Y.; Cao, G. Developments in Nanostructured Cathode Materials for High-Performance Lithium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2008, 20, 2251–2269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Scrosati, B.; Garche, J. Lithium batteries: Status, prospects and future. J. Power Sources 2010, 195, 2419–2430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yabuuchi, N.; Kubota, K.; Dahbi, M.; Komaba, S. Research Development on Sodium-Ion Batteries. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 11636–11682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kim, H.; Hong, J.; Park, K.-Y.; Kim, H.; Kim, S.-W.; Kang, K. Aqueous Rechargeable Li and Na Ion Batteries. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 11788–11827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Nithya, C.; Gopukumar, S. Sodium ion batteries: A newer electrochemical storage. WIREs Energy Environ. 2014, 4, 253–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Han, M.H.; Gonzalo, E.; Singh, G.; Rojo, T. A comprehensive review of sodium layered oxides: Powerful cathodes for Na-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 81–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yoo, H.D.; Shterenberg, I.; Gofer, Y.; Gershinsky, G.; Pour, N.; Aurbach, D. Mg rechargeable batteries: An on-going challenge. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 2265–2279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mohtadi, R.; Mizuno, F. Magnesium batteries: Current state of the art, issues and future perspectives. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2014, 5, 1291–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wang, R.Y.; Wessells, C.D.; Huggins, R.A.; Cui, Y. Highly Reversible Open Framework Nanoscale Electrodes for Divalent Ion Batteries. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 5748–5752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Jayaprakash, N.; Das, S.K.; Archer, L.A. The rechargeable aluminum-ion battery. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 12610–12612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Lee, B.; Yoon, C.S.; Lee, H.R.; Chung, K.Y.; Cho, B.W.; Oh, S.H. Electrochemically-induced reversible transition from the tunneled to layered polymorphs of manganese dioxide. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Lapidus, S.H.; Rajput, N.N.; Qu, X.; Chapman, K.W.; Persson, K.A.; Chupas, P.J. Solvation structure and energetics of electrolytes for multivalent energy storage. Phys. Chem. 2014, 16, 21941–21945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Lee, J.; Ju, J.B.; Cho, W.I.; Cho, B.W.; Oh, S.H. Todorokite-type MnO2 as a zinc-ion intercalating material. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 112, 138–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yuan, C.; Zhang, Y.; Pan, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, G.; Cao, D. Investigation of the intercalation of polyvalent cations (Mg2+, Zn2+) into λ-MnO2 for rechargeable aqueous battery. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 116, 404–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, M.; Rong, Z.; Malik, R.; Canepa, P.; Jain, A.; Ceder, G.; Persson, K.A. Spinel compounds as multivalent battery cathodes: A systematic evaluation based on ab initio calculations. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 964–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gregory, T.D. Nonaqueous Electrochemistry of Magnesium. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1990, 137, 775–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Novák, P.; Desilvestro, J. Electrochemical Insertion of Magnesium in Metal Oxides and Sulfides from Aprotic Electrolytes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1993, 140, 140–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Spahr, M.E.; Novak, P.; Schnyder, B.; Haas, O.; Nesper, R. Characterization of Layered Lithium Nickel Manganese Oxides Synthesized by a Novel Oxidative Coprecipitation Method and Their Electrochemical Performance as Lithium Insertion Electrode Materials. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1998, 145, 1113–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Novák, P.; Imhof, R.; Haas, O. Magnesium insertion electrodes for rechargeable nonaqueous batteries—A competitive alternative to lithium? Electrochim. Acta 1999, 45, 351–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Novák, P.; Scheifele, W.; Haas, O. Magnesium insertion batteries—An alternative to lithium? J. Power Sources 1995, 54, 479–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Novák, P.; Shklover, V.; Nesper, R. Magnesium Insertion in Vanadium Oxides: A Structural Study. Z. Phys. Chem. 1994, 185, 51–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sánchez, L.; Pereira-Ramos, J.-P. Electrochemical insertion of magnesium in a mixed manganese–cobalt oxide. J. Mater. Chem. 1997, 7, 471–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Le, D.B.; Passerini, S.; Coustier, F.; Guo, J.; Soderstrom, T.; Owens, B.B.; Smyrl, W.H. Intercalation of Polyvalent Cations into V2O5 Aerogels. Chem. Mater. 1998, 10, 682–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Imamura, D.; Hibino, M.; Miyayama, M.; Judo, T. High Rate Magnesium Intercalation into V2O5/Carbon Composites. Trans. Mater. Res. Soc. Jpn. 2002, 27, 675–678. [Google Scholar]
  31. Imamura, D. Characterization of magnesium-intercalated V2O5/carbon composites. Solid State Ion. 2003, 161, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Stojković, I.; Cvjetićanin, N.; Markovic, S.; Mitrić, M.; Mentus, S. Electrochemical behavior of V2O5 Xerogel and V2O5 Xerogel/C composite in an aqueous LiNO3 and Mg(NO3)2 solutions. Acta Phys. Polonica A 2010, 117, 837–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Vujković, M.; Pašti, I.; Simatović, I.; Šljukić, B.; Milenković, M.; Mentus, S. The Influence Of Intercalated Ions On Cyclic Stability Of V2O5/graphite Composite In Aqueous Electrolytic Solutions: Experimental And Theoretical Approach. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 176, 130–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Imamura, D.; Miyayama, M.; Hibino, M.; Kudo, T. Mg Intercalation Properties into V2O5 gel/Carbon Composites under High-Rate Condition. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2003, 150, A753–A758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yang, S.; Gong, Y.; Liu, Z.; Zhan, L.; Hashim, D.P.; Ma, L.; Vajtai, R.; Ajayan, P.M. Bottom-up Approach toward Single-Crystalline VO2-Graphene Ribbons as Cathodes for Ultrafast Lithium Storage. Nano Lett. 2013, 1596–1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Makino, K.; Katayama, Y.; Miura, T.; Kishi, T. Preparation and electrochemical magnesium insertion behaviors of Mg0.5+y(MeyTi1−y)2(PO4)3 (Me = Cr, Fe). J. Power Sources 2002, 112, 85–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yuan, H.; Jiao, L.; Cao, J.; Liu, X.; Zhao, M.; Wang, Y. Development of Magnesium-Insertion Positive Electrode for Rechargeable Magnesium Batteries. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2004, 20, 41–45. [Google Scholar]
  38. Aurbach, D.; Weissman, I.; Gofer, Y.; Levi, E. Nonaqueous magnesium electrochemistry and its application in secondary batteries. Chem. Rec. 2003, 3, 61–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Jiao, L.-F.; Yuan, H.-T.; Si, Y.-C.; Wang, Y.-J.; Wang, Y.-M. Synthesis of Cu0.1-doped vanadium oxide nanotubes and their application as cathode materials for rechargeable magnesium batteries. Electrochem. Commun. 2006, 8, 1041–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Giraudet, J.; Claves, D.; Guérin, K.; Dubois, M.; Houdayer, A.; Masin, F.; Hamwi, A. Magnesium batteries: Towards a first use of graphite fluorides. J. Power Sources 2007, 173, 592–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Aurbach, D.; Lu, Z.; Schechter, A.; Gofer, Y.; Gizbar, H.; Turgeman, R.; Cohen, Y.; Moshkovich, M.; Levi, E. Prototype systems for rechargeable magnesium batteries. Nature 2000, 407, 724–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Amatucci, G.G.; Badway, F.; Singhal, A.; Beaudoin, B.; Skandan, G.; Bowmer, T.; Plitz, I.; Pereira, N.; Chapman, T.; Jaworski, R. Investigation of Yttrium and Polyvalent Ion Intercalation into Nanocrystalline Vanadium Oxide. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2001, 148, A940–A950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wang, R.Y.; Shyam, B.; Stone, K.H.; Weker, J.N.; Pasta, M.; Lee, H.-W.; Toney, M.F.; Cui, Y. Reversible Multivalent (Monovalent, Divalent, Trivalent) Ion Insertion in Open Framework Materials. Adv. Energy Mater. 2015, 5, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yagi, S.; Ichitsubo, T.; Shirai, Y.; Yanai, S.; Doi, T.; Murase, K.; Matsubara, E. A concept of dual-salt polyvalent-metal storage battery. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 1144–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  45. Lisbona, D.; Snee, T. A review of hazards associated with primary lithium and lithium-ion batteries. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2011, 89, 434–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Scrosati, B.; Hassoun, J.; Sun, Y.-K. Lithium-ion batteries. A look into the future. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 3287–3295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, Q.; Ping, P.; Zhao, X.; Chu, G.; Sun, J.; Chen, C. Thermal runaway caused fire and explosion of lithium ion battery. J. Power Sources 2012, 208, 210–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Beck, F.; Rüetschi, P. Rechargeable batteries with aqueous electrolytes. Electrochim. Acta 2000, 45, 2467–2482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Levi, E.; Levi, M.D.; Chasid, O.; Aurbach, D. A review on the problems of the solid state ions diffusion in cathodes for rechargeable Mg batteries. J. Electroceram 2007, 22, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, W.; Dahn, J.R.; Wainwright, D.S. Rechargeable Lithium Batteries with Aqueous Electrolytes. Science 1994, 20, 1115–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Liu, S.; Hu, J.J.; Yan, N.F.; Pan, G.L.; Li, G.R.; Gao, X.P. Aluminum storage behavior of anatase TiO2 nanotube arrays in aqueous solution for aluminum ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 9743–9746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Liu, S.; Pan, G.L.; Li, G.R.; Gao, X.P. Copper hexacyanoferrate nanoparticles as cathode material for aqueous Al-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 959–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. He, Y.J.; Peng, J.F.; Chu, W.; Li, Y.Z.; Tong, D.G. Black mesoporous anatase TiO2 nano leaves: A high capacity and high rate anode for aqueous Al-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 1721–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Liu, Y.; Sang, S.; Wu, Q.; Lu, Z.; Liu, K.; Liu, H. The electrochemical behavior of Cl assisted Al3+ insertion into titanium dioxide nanotube arrays in aqueous solution for aluminum ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 143, 340–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Xu, C.; Li, B.; Du, H.; Kang, F. Energetic Zinc Ion Chemistry: The Rechargeable Zinc Ion Battery. Angew. Chem. 2012, 51, 933–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Manickam, M.; Singh, P.; Issa, T.B.; Thurgate, S. Electrochemical behavior of anatase TiO2 in aqueous lithium hydroxide electrolyte. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2006, 36, 599–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wessells, C.D.; Huggins, R.A.; Cui, Y. Copper Hexacyanoferrate Battery Electrodes with Long Cycle Life and High Power. Nat. Commun. 2011, 2, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Wessells, C.D.; Peddada, S.V.; Huggins, R.A.; Cui, Y. Nickel Hexacyanoferrate Nanoparticle Electrodes For Aqueous Sodium and Potassium Ion Batteries. Nano Lett. 2014, 11, 5421–5425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Xu, C.; Chen, Y.; Shi, S.; Li, J.; Kang, F.; Su, D. Secondary batteries with multivalent ions for energy storage. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Zhang, L.; Chen, L.; Zhou, X.; Liu, Z. Towards High-Voltage Aqueous Metal-Ion Batteries Beyond 1.5 V: The Zinc/Zinc Hexacyanoferrate System. Adv. Energy Mater. 2014, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Jia, Z.; Wang, B.; Wang, Y. Copper hexacyanoferrate with a well-defined open framework as a positive electrode for aqueous zinc ion batteries. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2015, 149–150, 601–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Trócoli, R.; Mantia, F.L. An Aqueous Zinc-Ion Battery Based on Copper Hexacyanoferrate. ChemSusChem 2014, 8, 481–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Gupta, T.; Kim, A.; Phadke, S.; Biswas, S.; Luong, T.; Hertzberg, B.J.; Chamoun, M.; Evans-Lutterodt, K.; Steingart, D.A. Improving the cycle life of a high-rate, high-potential aqueous dual-ion battery using hyper-dendritic zinc and copper hexacyanoferrate. J. Power Sources 2016, 305, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sinha, N.N.; Munichandraiah, N. Electrochemical Conversion of LiMn2O4 to MgMn2O4 in Aqueous Electrolytes. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 2008, 11, F23–F26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Nam, K.W.; Kim, S.; Lee, S.; Salama, M.; Shterenberg, I.; Gofer, Y.; Kim, J.-S.; Yang, E.; Park, C.S.; Kim, J.-S.; et al. The High Performance of Crystal Water Containing Manganese Birnessite Cathodes for Magnesium Batteries. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 4071–4079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Kim, C.; Phillips, P.J.; Key, B.; Yi, T.; Nordlund, D.; Yu, Y.-S.; Bayliss, R.D.; Han, S.-D.; He, M.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Direct Observation of Reversible Magnesium Ion Intercalation into a Spinel Oxide Host. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 3377–3384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Stojkovic, I.; Pasti, I.; Cvijeticanin, N.; Mitric, M.; Mentus, S. Electrochemical behavior of V2O5 xerogel in aqueous LiNO3 solution. Electrochem. Commun. 2009, 11, 1512–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Choi, J.; Alvarez, E.; Arunkumar, T.A.; Manthiram, A. Proton Insertion into Oxide Cathodes during Chemical Delithiation. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 2006, 9, A241–A244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Manthiram, A.; Choi, J. Chemical and structural instabilities of lithium ion battery cathodes. J. Power Sources 2006, 159, 249–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wang, Y.-G.; Luo, J.-Y.; Wang, C.-X.; Xia, Y.-Y. Hybrid Aqueous Energy Storage Cells Using Activated Carbon and Lithium-Ion Intercalated Compounds II. Comparison of LiMn2O4, LiCo1/3Ni1/3Mn1/3O2, and LiCoO2 Positive Electrodes. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2006, 153, A1425–A1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Luo, J.-Y.; Cui, W.-J.; He, P.; Xia, Y.-Y. Raising the cycling stability of aqueous lithium-ion batteries by eliminating oxygen in the electrolyte. Nat. Chem. 2010, 2, 760–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Yu, D.Y.W.; Donoue, K.; Kadohata, T.; Murata, T.; Matsuta, S.; Fujitani, S. Impurities in LiFePO4 and Their Influence on Material Characteristics. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2008, 155, A526–A530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Li, G.; Yang, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Huang, Y. Hybrid aqueous battery based on Na3V2(PO4)3/C cathode and zinc anode for potential large-scale energy storage. J. Power Sources 2016, 308, 52–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Pasta, M.; Wessells, C.D.; Huggins, R.A.; Cui, Y. A high-rate and long cycle life aqueous electrolyte battery for grid-scale energy storage. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Tao, H.; Tong, X.; Gan, L.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, X.; Liu, X. Effect of adding various carbon additives to porous zinc anode in rechargeable hybrid aqueous battery. J. Alloys Comp. 2016, 658, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Vujković, M.; Nedić, Z.; Tančić, P.; Aleksić, O.S.; Nikolić, M.V.; Mioč, U.; Mentus, S. Electrochemical lithiation/delithiation kinetics and capacity of phosphate tungsten bronze and its chemically pre-lithiated derivatives in aqueous solutions. J. Mater. Sci. 2015, 51, 2481–2489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Wu, X.; Li, Y.; Li, C.; He, Z.; Xiang, Y.; Xiong, L.; Chen, D.; Yu, Y.; Sun, K.; He, Z.; et al. The electrochemical performance improvement of LiMn2O4/Zn based on zinc foil as the current collector and thiourea as an electrolyte additive. J. Power Sources 2015, 300, 453–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Neff, V.D. Electrochemical Oxidation and Reduction of Thin Films of Prussian Blue. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1978, 125, 886–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Itaya, K.; Uchida, I.; Neff, V.D. Electrochemistry of polynuclear transition metal cyanides: Prussian blue and its analogues. Acc. Chem. Res. 1986, 19, 162–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Stilwell, D.E.; Park, K.H.; Miles, M.H. Electrochemical studies of the factors influencing the cycle stability of Prussian Blue films. J. Appl. Electrochem. 1992, 22, 325–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. De Tacconi, N.R.; Rajeshwar, K.; Lezna, R.O. Metal Hexacyanoferrates: Electro Synthesis, in situ Characterization and Applications. Chem. Inform 2003, 15, 3046–3062. [Google Scholar]
  82. Rosi, N.L.; Eckert, J.; Eddaudi, M.; Vodak, D.T.; Kim, J.; O’keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O.M. Hydrogen storage in microporous metal-organic frameworks. Science 2003, 300, 1127–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Post, J.E.; Heaney, P.J.; Hanson, J. Synchrotron X-ray diffraction study of the structure and dehydration behavior of todorokite. Am. Mineral. 2003, 88, 142–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Lodovico, L.; Torresi, R.M.; Martins, V.L.; Benedetti, T.M. Electrochemical Behavior of Iron and Magnesium in Ionic Liquids. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2013, 25, 460–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Lu, Z.; Schechter, A.; Moshkovich, M.; Aurbach, D. On the electrochemical behavior of magnesium electrodes in polar aprotic electrolyte solutions. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1999, 466, 203–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Aurbach, D.; Suresh, G.S.; Levi, E.; Mitelman, A.; Mizrahi, O.; Chusid, O.; Brunelli, M. Progress in Rechargeable Magnesium Battery Technology. Adv. Mater. 2007, 19, 4260–4267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Liang, Y.; Feng, R.; Yang, S.; Ma, H.; Liang, J.; Chen, J. Rechargeable Mg Batteries with Graphene-like MoS2 Cathode and Ultrasmall Mg Nanoparticle Anode. Adv. Mater. 2010, 23, 640–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Liu, B.; Luo, T.; Mu, G.; Wang, X.; Chen, D.; Shen, G. Rechargeable Mg-Ion Batteries Based on WSe2 Nanowire Cathodes. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 8051–8058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Liang, Y.; Yoo, H.D.; Li, Y.; Shuai, J.; Calderon, H.A.; Hernandez, F.C.R.; Grabow, L.C.; Yao, Y. Interlayer-Expanded Molybdenum Disulfide Nanocomposites for Electrochemical Magnesium Storage. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 2194–2202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Muldoon, J.; Bucur, C.B.; Gregory, T. Quest for Nonaqueous Multivalent Secondary Batteries: Magnesium and Beyond. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 11683–11720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Thackeray, M.; David, W.; Bruce, P.; Goodenough, J. Lithium insertion into manganese spinels. Mater. Res. Bull. 1983, 18, 461–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Arthur, T.S.; Zhang, R.; Ling, C.; Glans, P.-A.; Fan, X.; Guo, J.; Mizuno, F. Understanding the Electrochemical Mechanism of K-αMnO2 for Magnesium Battery Cathodes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 7004–7008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Ling, C.; Zhang, R.; Arthur, T.S.; Mizuno, F. How General is the Conversion Reaction in Mg Battery Cathode: A Case Study of the Magnesiation of α-MnO2. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 5799–5807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Garche, J.; Dyer, C.K.; Moseley, P.; Ogumi, Z.; Rand, D.; Newnes, B. Encyclopedia of Electrochemical Power Sources; Academic Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  95. Gautam, G.S.; Canepa, P.; Abdellahi, A.; Urban, A.; Malik, R.; Ceder, G. The Intercalation Phase Diagram of Mg in V2O5 from First-Principles. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 3733–3742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Gershinsky, G.; Yoo, H.D.; Gofer, Y.; Aurbach, D. Electrochemical and Spectroscopic Analysis of Mg2+ Intercalation into Thin Film Electrodes of Layered Oxides: V2O5 and MoO3. Langmuir 2013, 29, 10964–10972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The crystal structure of Copper Hexacyanoferrate (CuHCF) (Reproduced with permission of [57]. Copyright Nature Publishing Group, 2015).
Figure 1. The crystal structure of Copper Hexacyanoferrate (CuHCF) (Reproduced with permission of [57]. Copyright Nature Publishing Group, 2015).
Nanomaterials 06 00041 g001
Figure 2. The reversible phase transition of α-MnO2 into triclinic Zn-birnessite upon intercalation of Zn ion into α-MnO2 during discharge/charge processes. (Reproduced with permission of [17]. Copyright Nature Publishing Group, 2015).
Figure 2. The reversible phase transition of α-MnO2 into triclinic Zn-birnessite upon intercalation of Zn ion into α-MnO2 during discharge/charge processes. (Reproduced with permission of [17]. Copyright Nature Publishing Group, 2015).
Nanomaterials 06 00041 g002
Figure 3. The crystal structure of Todorokite MnO2 mineral with a 3 × 3 tunnel structure and zeolitic/crystal water inside the tunnels (Reproduced with permission from [83]. Copyright Mineralogical Scoiety of America, 2015).
Figure 3. The crystal structure of Todorokite MnO2 mineral with a 3 × 3 tunnel structure and zeolitic/crystal water inside the tunnels (Reproduced with permission from [83]. Copyright Mineralogical Scoiety of America, 2015).
Nanomaterials 06 00041 g003
Table 1. Comparison of standard electrode potentials and theoretical capacities of univalent and multivalent anodes.
Table 1. Comparison of standard electrode potentials and theoretical capacities of univalent and multivalent anodes.
IonStandard Electrode Potential (V)Theoretical Capacity
Specific Capacity (mAh/g)Volumetric Capacity (mAh/cm3)
Back to TopTop