Next Article in Journal
Preparation and Application of Core–Shell Nanocarbon-Based Slow-Release Foliar Fertilizer
Previous Article in Journal
Single-Frame Vignetting Correction for Post-Stitched-Tile Imaging Using VISTAmap
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Graphitic Carbon Nitride Nanomaterials-Based Electrochemical Sensing Interfaces for Monitoring Heavy Metal Ions in Aqueous Environments

1
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Anhui Water Conservancy Technical College, Hefei 231603, China
2
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
3
Key Lab of Aerospace Structural Parts Forming Technology and Equipment of Anhui Province, Institute of Industry and Equipment Technology, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2025, 15(7), 564; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15070564
Submission received: 10 March 2025 / Revised: 2 April 2025 / Accepted: 3 April 2025 / Published: 7 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Nanoscience and Nanotechnology)

Abstract

:
The persistent threat of heavy metal ions (e.g., Pb2+, Hg2+, Cd2+) in aqueous environments to human health underscores an urgent need for advanced sensing platforms capable of rapid and precise pollutant monitoring. Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4), a metal-free polymeric semiconductor, has emerged as a revolutionary material for constructing next-generation environmental sensors due to its exceptional physicochemical properties, including tunable electronic structure, high chemical/thermal stability, large surface area, and unique optical characteristics. This review systematically explores the integration of g-C3N4 with functional nanomaterials (e.g., metal nanoparticles, metal oxide nanomaterials, carbonaceous materials, and conduction polymer) to engineer high-performance sensing interfaces for heavy metal detection. The structure-property relationship is critically analyzed, emphasizing how morphology engineering (nanofibers, nanosheets, and mesoporous) and surface functionalization strategies enhance sensitivity and selectivity. Advanced detection mechanisms are elucidated, including electrochemical signal amplification, and photoinduced electron transfer processes enabled by g-C3N4’s tailored bandgap and surface active sites. Furthermore, this review addresses challenges in real-world deployment, such as scalable nanomaterial synthesis, matrix interference mitigation, and long-term reliable detection. This work provides valuable insights for advancing g-C3N4-based electrochemical sensing technologies toward sustainable environmental monitoring and intelligent pollution control systems.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The contamination of water pollution has become a matter of public concern in environmental issues, especially heavy metal ions (HMIs), which can result in serious injury to public health even at very low levels of exposure [1,2]. Simultaneously, the enrichment and transmission of toxic metals in the food and food chain is one of the main problems in ecology [3,4]. Sources of heavy metal ions include industrial and municipal effluent discharges, as well as mining and smelting. Trace heavy metals such as zinc, copper, and cobalt are essential trace elements for the human body; while others, such as cadmium, mercury, and lead, are highly toxic and cause irreversible damage to the human body [5,6]. In addition, the toxicity of heavy metal pollutants also depends on their main form. For example, Cr(III) is essential for most biological systems, and Cr(VI) is a highly toxic substance that can cause kidney failure, nervous system damage, and even death [7]. The permitted threshold concentrations for common heavy metal ions in drinking water, as established by major regulatory bodies such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the World Health Organization (WHO), are as follows: lead (Pb) < 5 μg/L; mercury (Hg) < 2 μg/L; cadmium (Cd) < 5 μg/L; arsenic (As) < 10 μg/L; chromium (Cr) < 50 μg/L [8]. Thus, establishing a sensitive, specific, and fast detection method for heavy metal ions is essential to prevent their ecotoxicological hazards.
At present, various methods, such as atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) [9], ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometry (UV) [10], X-ray spectroscopy (XRF) [11,12], and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) [13], have been used for the determination of heavy metal ions. Among these methods, the electrochemical method is favored by researchers for its low cost, easy operation, high stability and sensitivity, and great application prospects [14]. These costly methods demand skilled operators, complex equipment, and multi-step preparation. Limited to quantification, they require chromatography integration for speciation analysis, risking sample alteration during handling/storage [15]. Therefore, developing rapid, low-cost, simple, and reliable technologies for in situ and real-time measurement of heavy metal ions remains an ongoing research focus.
Electrochemical detection methods, with their high sensitivity, simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and ease of integration, have attracted significant attention for enabling rapid on-site analysis of heavy metals in environments [16]. Common techniques include linear sweep voltammetry, cyclic voltammetry, stripping voltammetry, and chronoamperometry. The presence of modified materials for the electrode plays an essential role in determining the detection sensitivity of the electrochemical sensors. In previous research, various available materials such as precious metals (Au, Ag, etc.) [17,18], transition metal oxides (TiO2, Fe3O4, Cu(OH)2, etc.) [19,20,21], g-C3N4 [22,23,24], graphene [25,26], and their nanostructured assemblies [27,28] have been extensively used as electrocatalysts to enhance redox reactions of reactive pollutants through adsorption and catalysis. Among them, graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) is a metal-free polymer with good resistance to acid, alkalis, and high temperatures because of the strong covalent bonds between carbon and nitrogen atoms [29]. Compared with other materials, pure g-C3N4 has defects of a small specific surface area, low charge mobility, and low utilization of visible light. It is usually modified by doping and changing its morphology to improve the specific surface area, enhance the charge migration, and improve the utilization of visible light [30,31]. In the field of environment and energy, g-C3N4 can be used for the photocatalytic degradation of pollutants [32,33], photocatalytic hydrogen production [34,35], carbon dioxide reduction [36,37], supercapacitors [38,39], and the adsorption of heavy metal ions [40]. In recent years, g-C3N4 and the nanocomposites based on g-C3N4 have been favored by a large number of researchers and also have been applied in electrochemical sensors for detecting heavy metal ions.
Although some review papers have introduced g-C3N4-based electrochemical sensors for environmental pollutant sensing [31,41], it is crucial to summarize the characteristics of g-C3N4-based electrochemical sensors in detecting heavy metal contaminants by analyzing the sensing behavior at sensitive interfaces and the morphological modulation of g-C3N4. Consequently, this review summarizes the detection mechanism of g-C3N4 and the properties of g-C3N4; the potential application of g-C3N4 in heavy metal detection was discussed and prospected. It is hoped that this article can provide some help to the majority of researchers, to make greater breakthroughs and innovations in future research.

2. The Performance Characteristics of C3N4

2.1. The Crystal Structure of C3N4

The crystal structure model of C3N4 was established based on first principles, including the α phase (α-C3N4), β phase (β-C3N4), cubic phase (c-C3N4), quasicubic phase (q-C3N4) and graphite-like phase (g-C3N4) [42,43,44]. As shown in Figure 1 below, the structure of the graphite-like phase (g-C3N4) is the most stable allotrope of carbon nitride and has attracted much attention in recent years [45]. It has a layered structure similar to graphite and contains two allotropes, namely tri-s-triazine (C6N7) and s-triazine (C3N3) rings. The s-triazine ring is aromatic, so the conjugated two-dimensional polymer of s-triazine will tend to form a p-conjugated plane layer, similar to graphite. Among them, tri-s-triazine is more stable in thermodynamics. Research has revealed that different crystal structures of C3N4 may significantly influence its electrochemical sensing performance. For instance, the α-phase demonstrates higher conductivity compared to the β-phase, which can be attributed to the more delocalized π-electrons in the α-phase that facilitate faster electron transfer during redox reactions [46]. The two-dimensional layered structure of graphitic-phase C3N4 (g-C3N4) promotes ion diffusion and migration, thereby exhibiting superior electrochemical performance in heavy metal detection [47]. These structure-property relationships may provide valuable guidance for material selection in specific sensing applications.

2.2. The Electronic Properties of C3N4

By contrast with traditional semiconductors (e.g., TiO2 and ZnO), g-C3N4 owns a two-dimensional (2D) lamellar structure with a π conjugated system and a moderate energy gap (∼2.7 eV) [14], which lead to unique optoelectronic properties, high chemical stability, and good visible-light absorption (approximately at 450∼460 nm). The plane of g-C3N4 consists of sp2 hybridized CN aromatic heterocycles. Among them, atoms in the layer are arranged in a honeycomb structure with strong covalent bonds and van der Waals forces in between layers. The valence band edge of g-C3N4 is mainly composed of N 2p; thus, the photogenic holes are generated at the N position. The conduction band edge is composed of N 2p and C 2p state hybridization, so the photogenerated electron bears high binding energy in the electron-hole pair, which leads to the high photogenerated charge carrier recombination rate of g-C3N4 [49,50,51]. Studies have shown that the band structure of the polymer melon structure is non-isotropic, in which there is a direct band gap at Γ and only dispersion in the Γ–X direction (Figure 2a). Furthermore, different thermal condensation temperatures will affect the electronic and optical properties of the synthesized carbon nitride [52]. The absorption edge shifts to longer wavelengths, indicating that the band gap decreases as the condensation temperature increases (Figure 2b).

2.3. Surface Physicochemical Properties of C3N4

Compared with most carbon materials, g has electron-rich properties, basic surface functional groups, and H-bonding motifs due to the presence of N and H atoms. Therefore, it is considered a potential candidate to supplement carbon in material applications [53,54,55]. Due to the influence of incomplete polycondensation, there are some defects on the surface of g-C3N4, namely the basic primary and/or secondary amine groups at the end of g-C3N4 (Figure 3). Compared with the ideal defect-free g-C3N4, g-C3N4 with surface defects has excellent electron-rich properties, leading to the formation of a variety of functions. In addition, the abundant basic functional groups on the surface of g-C3N4 can absorb acidic and toxic molecules through electrostatic action [55]. However, the hydrophobicity of g-C3N4 leads to weak interfacial interactions, which further inhibit surface electron transfer and catalytic reactions [56]. To address this issue, materials such as nonmetallic elements, metal nanoparticles, carbon nanotubes, and graphene-based flakes can be doped between the layers of g-C3N4 to significantly enhance its hydrophilicity [57]. Zhu et al. [58]. in situ grew CeO2 nanocrystals on the surface of two-dimensional MoS2/g-C3N4 nanosheets. The ternary composite material significantly enhanced the hydrophilicity of the substrate. In addition, the hydrophilicity can be improved by introducing oxygen-containing functional groups on the g-C3N4 structure, which can enhance the interfacial coupling and photocatalytic activity [59]. Shen et al. [60] introduced π-electron-rich domains and hydrophilic hydroxyl groups into the g-C3N4 structure to form tartaric acid-modified g-C3N4 (TA-CN). In this system, the hydroxyl groups regulate reaction kinetics through their hydrophilicity, enhance the selective adsorption of reactants, and stabilize intermediates.

2.4. Photoelectrochemical Properties of C3N4

Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) is defined as an emerging semiconductor for applications in photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical analysis. As a metal-free photocatalyst, g-C3N4 has been shown to possess the band characteristics of metal oxide semiconductors with a band gap of about 2.7 eV and spectral response up to 460 nm, indicating visible light absorption [62]. Thus, g-C3N4 is regarded as a promising semiconductor for light-emitting devices, photocatalysis, photoelectrodes, energy conversion, photodegradation, and PEC sensors [63,64,65,66]. This work was proposed by Du et al. who synthesized 3D branched crystalline carbon nitride with 1D nanoneedles [67]. It has a high specific surface area, fast photo-generated charge transfer, and excellent light-gathering performance. More importantly, the electron-hole pair separation and crystallinity are improved. In addition, Bu et al. proved the photocurrent conversion performance and photocathodic protection performance of g-C3N4 in 304 stainless steel under the irradiation of visible light or white light [68]. Su et al. used mpg-C3N4 as a photocatalyst, activated O2 under visible light irradiation, and achieved high selective catalysis of benzaldehyde [69]. In addition, the photocatalytic performance of visible light-sensitive metal-free mesoporous graphite carbon nitride can be used to establish a system to degrade drugs for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases [70].

2.5. Electrochemical Properties of C3N4

As a multifunctional electrocatalyst, the g-C3N4 semiconductor is useful in electrochemical detection and biosensing due to its high activity, large surface area, and fast electron transfer rate. Among the multifunctional electrocatalysts, pyridine N atoms in g-C3N4 with strong electron acceptors are considered as the active sites for electrochemical reactions [71]. g-C3N4 has been used in electrochemical sensing applications in the analysis of water environment pollutants. For example, g-C3N4 ultrathin nanosheets displayed higher surface reactive sites and better electrical conductivity and exhibited good selectivity and repeatability in Cd2+ detection [24,72]. In addition, the electrochemical sensing device based on g-C3N4 can also achieve biomarker analysis. g-C3N4 was used in the development of a glucose sensor as well as for the detection of dopamine and H2O2. Furthermore, g-C3N4 has been utilized in DNA analysis through stacked g-C3N4 nanofibers modified sensor detection of free DNA bases, cell analysis in the area of recognition and quantification of specific cells, analysis of heavy metals ions, as well as the detection of high-energy explosives and nerve agents.

3. Electrochemical Detection of Heavy Metal Ions

3.1. Electrochemical Detection Methods

The electrochemical detection method has a short analysis time, low power cost, and high sensitivity, and can be detected in situ [73]. Therefore, it has aroused great interest in the detection of heavy metal ions. Electrochemical sensing of HMI involves the use of biosensing electrodes that are employed to pass current to the aqueous solution and generate some useful and measurable electrical signal corresponding to the electrochemical reactions within the solution due to the presence of metal ions. The general experimental device for electrochemical detection of heavy metal ions usually consists of an electrolytic cell composed of an ion conductor (electrolyte) and an electronic conductor (electrode) [74]. In this case, the aqueous solution composed of HMI acts as an electrolyte. The battery potential is measured at the interface between the electrode and the electrolyte solution. Usually, electrochemical detection uses a three-electrode system, including a working electrode (WE), a reference electrode (RE), and a counter electrode (CE) (Figure 4). In the electrochemical detection process, different types of electrochemical techniques are classified according to the different types of detection signals generated by the presence of heavy metal ions in the solution matrix, such as current, potential, conductivity, electrochemical impedance, electrochemiluminescence, etc. [75,76]. Through customized functionalization and assembly, these materials can be easily assembled on the electrode surface for the manufacture of sensing electrodes and the sensitive and selective detection of heavy metal ions. The assembly of different materials such as metals, metal films, metal oxides, nanomaterials, carbon nanotubes, polymers, microspheres, and biological materials can further improve electrochemical performance. Based on these detection signals, electrochemical sensing can be divided into the amperometric method, potentiometric method, electrochemical impedance method, capacitance method, and electrochemiluminescence method. In most of these techniques, the changes in other parameters are measured by controlling any of the current or electric potentials.

3.2. Possible Mechanisms of Heavy Metal Ion Detection Based on g-C3N4 Nanomaterials

Stable and reliable heavy metal ion response signals are an important guarantee for electrochemical analysis methods to meet actual application requirements. The focus is on exploring the interaction between heavy metal ion forms and electrode modification materials, as well as their diffusion and transformation processes on sensitive interfaces. In the detection process of heavy metal ions, good adsorption performance can significantly improve the electrochemical detection performance. Based on this, nanomaterials with high specific surface area, excellent catalytic activity, electrical conductivity, and surface modifiability show significant advantages in electrochemical detection [78]. While a large number of binding sites and functional groups dominate the high sorption capacity of g-C3N4 and g-C3N4-based materials through the formation of strong surface complexes [79]. The response mechanism of heavy metal ions was studied in detail by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Figure 5 shows that C≡N and N–H functional groups may interact with Pb (II) and Cu (II) to form complexes. The delocalized π-electron system of the triazine ring (C3N3) and heptazine ring (C6N7) can act as Lewis bases, and metal ions act as Lewis acids. Therefore, through the Lewis acid−base interaction, the adsorption of heavy metal ions on the g-C3N4 is also ascribed to the strong surface complexation between the g-C3N4 and metal ions [80]. Figure 5a,b also shows that Cu(II) can form a complex with the g-C3N4 more powerfully than Pb(II).
The essence of electrochemical detection is the electrocatalytic reaction process at the sensing interface, which will affect the enrichment/reduction of heavy metals and the corresponding dissolution/oxidation signal. Therefore, elucidating the electrocatalytic mechanism between the sensing interface and the target pollutant is essential for the development of an effective functional sensing interface to achieve high sensitivity and selective detection of heavy metals. Hu et al. [81] prepared a metal-free g-C3N4/CB material for the detection of heavy metal ions. The detection sensitivity of the g-C3N4/CB electrochemical sensor under visible light irradiation is greatly improved under dark conditions (Figure 5c). Stripping voltammetry includes two processes: enrichment and dissolution. By applying an applied voltage, the target pollutant in the solution is enriched on the electrode surface, and a reverse voltage is applied to dissolve the metal or insoluble film enriched on the electrode surface [82]. The g-C3N4 material is excited under visible light irradiation to generate electrons (e) and holes (h+) in the conduction band and valence band, respectively. Photogenerated electrons act as a reducing agent to promote the reduction of heavy metal ions to the metal state on the electrode surface. In the electrochemical dissolution process, photogenerated holes are beneficial to the oxidation of heavy metals into corresponding ions (Figure 5d).
In summary, the intrinsic properties of g-C3N4 and the potential electrochemical detection mechanisms indicate that g-C3N4 nanomaterials are promising candidates for constructing electrochemical sensors toward heavy metal ions. Especially, its tunable surface chemistry, unique electronic structure, and high stability ensure its environmental monitoring application.

4. Application of g-C3N4 in Heavy Metal Detection

Bulk g-C3N4 has been considered to have a similar layered structure to graphite; with its unique electronic energy band structure, high thermochemical stability, and low-cost precursor materials, g-C3N4 has attracted people’s attention in the photocatalytic degradation of environmental organic pollutants and electrochemical sensor detection of heavy metal ions [83,84]. However, the high recombination rate of photoexcited charge carriers and the small specific surface area in the bulk g-C3N4 system led to low photocatalytic activity [85,86]. Therefore, many approaches have been used to address these limitations, such as changing the morphology of g-C3N4 or a composite with other nanoparticles as a template. Mainly, the excellent adsorption and catalytic properties of g-C3N4 nanomaterials brought new insights to utilize them as an electrochemical modifier for heavy metal ion detection. In the following sub-sections, recent advances in g-C3N4 and g-C3N4-based nanocomposites for heavy metal ion sensing are discussed, and their sensing performances are presented in Table 1.

4.1. g-C3N4 Nanofibers/Tubes

Low-dimensional functional nanomaterials have attracted much attention due to their high specific surface area and excellent electronic and optical properties [112,113]. Compared with bulk g-C3N4, one-dimensional structures such as g-C3N4 tubes or rods have a higher aspect ratio, which can guide the electrons to move along the axial direction and limit the lateral transfer of electrons, thereby inhibiting photo-generated carrier recombination [114,115]. At the same time, this structure usually has a larger specific surface area, so that its surface has more reactive active sites, which is conducive to the improvement of catalytic reaction performance [116]. In addition, the highly ordered array of nanotube rod structures can provide an efficient electron migration path for electron-hole transport. The one-dimensional structure of g-C3N4 is synthesized using chitosan as a template [117]. Lv et al. [118] successfully prepared g-C3N4 nanofibers by hydrolysis under alkaline conditions. Figure 6a is the proposed preparation mechanism of g-C3N4 nanofibers; the g-C3N4 nanofibers show an ultrathin structure and are up to a micron in length (Figure 6c). Compared with bulk g-C3N4, the prepared g-C3N4 nanofibers have higher fluorescence quantum yield and larger specific surface area. In addition, g-C3N4 nanofiber fluorescent probes have achieved high selectivity and sensitivity for DA detection, with a minimum detection limit of 17 nM (Figure 6d,e). Tian et al. [119] quickly prepared ultrathin C3N4 nanofibers with a diameter of 5–10 nm from top to bottom through alkaline catalytic hydrolysis. The morphology of g-C3N4 nanostructures can be controlled by reaction time. A fluorescence sensor was constructed using the prepared ultrathin C3N4, which can detect Fe3+ rapidly and selectively. Zheng et al. [120] synthesized helical g-C3N4 rods by nanometer casting using mesoporous silica as templates. Compared with bulk g-C3N4, the spiral structure of g-C3N4 promotes the charge separation and mass transfer of carbonitride semiconductors, thus significantly improving the catalytic efficiency of water decomposition and carbon dioxide reduction. Dimitra et al. [121] synthesized rod graphitic carbon nitride (RGCN) by a chemical method, which showed obvious selectivity to Cu2+ ions. The influence of morphology on the Cu2+ sensor was further investigated, and the thin sheet-like graphitic carbon nitride (SGCN) was synthesized. Compared with SGCN, RGCN shows a stronger Cu2+ sensing capability due to its porous rod structure and high nitrogen content. Wang et al. [95] reported a highly sensitive electrochemical sensor based on a sulfur-doped C3N4 bundle with hierarchical pores/graphene composites (STB/Gs-x) for the detection of trace heavy metal ions in the environment. The sulfur-containing GCN tube bundle (STB) was constructed by a one-step method. The focus is on the synergistic effect of the layered porous tube bundle structure and S atom doping on the detection of HMIs, which further solves the deficiencies of b-g-C3N4 in the detection of electrochemical HMIs.

4.2. g-C3N4 Nanosheets

In recent years, inspired by the methods for preparing graphene and graphene-like materials, the bulk g-C3N4 can be exfoliated into a single or few layers of graphene-like C3N4 [122,123]. The thickness of nanosheets is generally at the nanometer or sub-nanometer level, and due to their unique two-dimensional anisotropic structural characteristics and quantum-filling effects, nanosheets have new physical and chemical properties [124,125]. It was found that 2D layered materials showed superior electrochemical performance in detecting heavy metal ions compared with 3D block materials [126]. The bulk C3N4 has a stacked layered structure in which each layer is composed of C–N covalent bonds with strong bonding force, but the bond energy between the layers is the van der Waals force with weak bond energy. Therefore, it is feasible to obtain C3N4 nanosheets by bulk C3N4 [127]. Nanosheets have the following advantages: (1) Having a large specific surface area can provide rich reactive sites. (2) With a short bulk diffusion length, the recombination of photo-excited charge carriers can be reduced. (3) Has a large band gap, which helps to enhance the redox capacity of charge carriers. (4) The photophysical behavior of the photo-excited carriers has changed compared with the bulk C3N4, which can extend the life of the charge carriers.
The preparation methods of g-C3N4 nanosheets can be divided into “top-down” and “bottom-up” [128]. The ultrasonic liquid exfoliation method and the secondary thermal oxidation etching method are the most commonly used to prepare g-C3N4 nanosheets from the “top-down” methods. In each of these methods, it is synthesized from a block structure by a two-step process. Bulk C3N4 was prepared by thermal polymerization and then transformed into nanosheets by exfoliating and etching. This approach offers advantages such as simple operation, low cost, and the ability to retain the inherent structure of g-C3N4. However, it faces challenges in precisely controlling the thickness and size distribution of the nanosheets during exfoliation. Additionally, the exfoliated nanosheets may restack, reducing the exposure of active sites. In contrast, “bottom-up” methods directly synthesize nanosheet structures through the condensation polymerization of molecular precursors (e.g., melamine and urea), including techniques such as hard-template, soft-template, and molecular self-assembly approaches. These methods provide advantages such as controllable structures, high specific surface area, and fewer defects. Nevertheless, they suffer from limitations like complex procedures and low yield.
Graphite carbon nitride has undergone sufficient protonation and ultrasonic treatment to synthesize g-C3N4 nanosheets. Its properties are similar to two-dimensional films, with enhanced ion conductivity and a large specific surface area. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations show that the high level of protonation makes g-C3N4 have better conductivity [129]. Hatamie et al. [90] prepared a large number of bulk g-C3N4 via high-temperature polymerization of melamine and obtained g-C3N4 nanometer tablets by sonication-assisted liquid exfoliation. Using g-C3N4 nanosheets to modify glassy carbon electrodes can achieve trace detection of lead ions in a water environment; the detection limit is 1 ng·L−1. Using the same method, Zhang et al. [130] prepared ultrathin g-C3N4 (Utg-C3N4) nanosheets with a thickness of about 8 mm. Compared with g-C3N4, the Utg-C3N4-modified GC electrode has an enhanced electrochemical response to Hg2+, which could be ascribed to the strong affinity between utg-C3N4 and Hg2+ through its single bond –NH and single bond –NH2 groups (Figure 7a). This allows for the detection of Hg2+ in aqueous solutions with high sensitivity and selectivity (Figure 7b,c). In addition, studies have shown that graphene-like carbonitrides can be synthesized by liquid phase exfoliation in 1,3-butanediol (Figure 7d). The obtained graphene-like C3N4 has a two-dimensional thin-layer structure with a thickness of about 3–6 atoms and a specific surface area of 32.54 m2g−1 (Figure 7e–h). The photocurrent response, electron transfer ability, and photocatalytic activity are all enhanced. In another work, Liu et al. [24] successfully prepared the activated ultrathin g-C3N4 nanosheets by bulk graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) to liquid ultrasonic exfoliation and protonation treatment. An electrochemical sensing interface was developed using activated g-C3N4 nanosheets modified with a glassy carbon electrode for the determination of Cd2+, with the obtained sensitivity and detection limit being 22.668 µA/µM and 3.9 nM, respectively. In addition, high spiked recoveries were obtained in the detection of Cd2+ in natural water and rice samples using the prepared a g-C3N4 modified electrode. This result can be attributed to the ultrathin layer and high surface for the effective accumulation of metal ions required for enhanced sensitivity.
The liquid phase stripping method has the advantages of simple and direct operation, but its yield is very low, and it is time-consuming. Thus, a new synthesis idea was developed: the precursors of g-C3N4 were pretreated and thermally polymerized from bottom to top to directly synthesize nano-flake g-C3N4. Sadhukhan et al. [131] synthesized two-dimensional carbon nitride by a microwave-assisted method. The g-C3N4 nanosheets were formed by evaporation-induced self-assembly of nitride carbon points on the fixed substrate by microwave radiation of formamide. In addition, a g-C3N4 nanosheet-modified glassy carbon electrode can be used for the highly sensitive detection of mercury ions in an aqueous solution, with a minimum detection limit of 9.1 × 10−11 M. Using melamine as a raw material and acetic acid as a bubble template, Wang et al. [72] prepared graphitized carbon nitride ultrathin nanosheets by thermal polymerization taking melamine as raw materials and deionized water and acetic acid as bubble templates. During the thermal polymerization process, acetic acid decomposes to produce a large number of bubbles, which is beneficial to the formation of CN nanosheets (Figure 7i,j). BET data (Figure 7k) show that the specific surface area of ultrathin nanosheets is 10 times that of g-C3N4, which indicates that there are more active sites to adsorb Cd2+. Then, an electrochemical-sensitive interface based on a g-C3N4 nanosheet was constructed for the detection and analysis of cadmium ions in an aqueous environment (Figure 7l). The results showed that the electrochemical sensor had a low detection limit (0.35nm) and had potential application potential in the detection of heavy metals. Zou et al. [91] reported that the sulfur-doped carbon nitride nanosheet-modified glassy carbon electrode (S-g-C3N4/GCE) has the best large specific surface area and good lead ion (Pb2+) detection ability. The results of DFT and XPS show that S doping mainly replaces the N atoms in the g-C3N4 molecular framework.
Figure 7. (a) Illustration of the electrochemical sensing of Hg2+ ions using a utg-C3N4/GC electrode. Electrochemical impedance spectra (b) and cyclic voltammograms (c) of bare GC, bg-C3N4/GC, and utg-C3N4/GC electrodes [130]. (d) Schematic illustration of liquid-exfoliation process from the bulk g-C3N4 to graphene−like C3N4. (e) AFM image of the prepared graphene-like C3N4. (f) The corresponding height image of the five randomly chosen graphene-like C3N4 sections. (g) TEM image of the graphene-like C3N4. (h) HRTEM image of the graphene-like C3N4 [132]. SEM and TEM images of NSCN (i,j). (k) N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of CN and NSCN. (l) The detection of Cd2+ on bare GC, CN-GC, and NSCN-GC (the concentration of Cd2+ is 10 μM) [72].
Figure 7. (a) Illustration of the electrochemical sensing of Hg2+ ions using a utg-C3N4/GC electrode. Electrochemical impedance spectra (b) and cyclic voltammograms (c) of bare GC, bg-C3N4/GC, and utg-C3N4/GC electrodes [130]. (d) Schematic illustration of liquid-exfoliation process from the bulk g-C3N4 to graphene−like C3N4. (e) AFM image of the prepared graphene-like C3N4. (f) The corresponding height image of the five randomly chosen graphene-like C3N4 sections. (g) TEM image of the graphene-like C3N4. (h) HRTEM image of the graphene-like C3N4 [132]. SEM and TEM images of NSCN (i,j). (k) N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms of CN and NSCN. (l) The detection of Cd2+ on bare GC, CN-GC, and NSCN-GC (the concentration of Cd2+ is 10 μM) [72].
Nanomaterials 15 00564 g007

4.3. The Mesopores g-C3N4

The attractive properties of mesoporous materials, including a high specific surface area and a controllable mesoporous structure, make them attractive subjects for many applications. Recent developments in mesoporous materials have improved the performance of these sensors by the immobilization of receptors to large and accessible surface areas and well-defined pores, which facilitate a high adsorption capacity for chromogenic/fluorescent molecules and the effective transport of analytes and hence detection limits below tens of nanomolar concentrations. In 2005, mesoporous carbon nitrides with different pore diameters were synthesized for the first time [133]. Compared with bulk g-C3N4, it significantly increased the specific surface area while maintaining the same physical and chemical properties, thereby improving its application in catalysis and adsorption. On the one hand, the presence of mesopores increases the specific surface area of g-C3N4 and provides more active reaction sites for metal ions. On the other hand, the hollow structure facilitates the transfer of electric charges and improves the sensitivity of electrochemical reactions.
The template method is one of the most effective methods to prepare MCN with controllable pore size, morphology, and structure. It is mainly divided into the hard template method and the soft template method. The hard template method is used to synthesize MCN mainly by immersing the precursor in the silica template such as SBA-15 [134], FDU-12 [135], KIT-6 [136], etc., polymerizing and crosslinking the carbon-containing precursor and the nitrogen-containing precursor at high temperature to form mesoporous CN material, and then cleaning with HF to remove the silica template [137]. The soft template method is a method in which surfactants, amphiphilic block polymers, or ionic liquids are used as templates for synthesis. The soft-template synthesis is mainly through the formation of different emulsions to obtain the micellar phase used as a template. The g-C3N4 precursor undergoes condensation around the soft template, and the soft template is removed by calcination polymerization [138]. Wang et al. [139]. prepared mesoporous graphite-carbonitride (mpg-C3N4) by the hard template method and proposed the use of mpg-C3N4 and β-cyclodextrin (β-CD) nanocomposites to modify glassy carbon working electrodes for the detection of trace amounts of TNT. It can be observed from the TEM image that mpg-C3N4 has a stacked lamellar structure and tiny mesopores (Figure 8a,b). BET measurement results show that g-C3N4 does not have obvious pores. For mpg-C3N4 samples, the pores are mainly distributed in the range of 3–20 nm (Figure 8c). The sensitivity of mpg-C3N4/β-CD nanocomposite for detecting TNT is 0.2 μA/μM, and the detection limit is 68ppb (Figure 8d,e). The mpg-C3N4/β-CD nanocomposite is used to capture nitroaromatic hydrocarbons near the electrode–solution interface to promote electrochemical reduction. Zhao et al. [140]. used a one-step soft template method to synthesize hollow mesoporous g-C3N4 spheres with high specific surface area and high porosity. It utilizes the supramolecular assembly of cyanuric acid and melamine through hydrogen bonds and the structure-oriented properties of ionic liquids. And the corresponding formation mechanism is placed in Figure 8h. It can be seen from Figure 8f,g that there are a large number of mesopores in the structure of CN, which may be caused by ionic liquid micelles, NH3, and CO2 gases. In addition, the porous structure and ultrathin nanosheets facilitate the exposure of active sites, thereby increasing the interface charge transfer rate.
According to previous reports, the pore structure of these mesoporous materials is conducive to enhancing the light-harvesting capacity and the ability to adsorb pollutants and significantly improving the photocatalytic activity. Therefore, the preparation of mesoporous g-C3N4 may be a promising method to solve the defects of the g-C3N4 body.

4.4. g-C3N4-Based Nanocomposites

4.4.1. Metal Nanoparticles/g-C3N4 Nanocomposites

Metal nanoparticles such as gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) have the characteristics of small size and a large specific surface area. At the same time, their unique optical, electronic, magnetic, and antibacterial properties have also received extensive attention [141]. The precursors and synthesis methods of metal nanoparticles play an important role in their performance. In general, metal salts are used as precursors to be reduced to the corresponding metal nanoparticles. The stabilizer is attached to the surface of the metal nanoparticles, effectively inhibiting the agglomeration of the metal nanoparticles. The metal nanoparticle-modified electrode can control the functionalization of the required groups and increase the mass transfer rate and specific surface area, thereby enhancing the dynamic performance of the electrode.
The g-C3N4 nanocomposite materials based on metal nanoparticles are considered to be effective, strong, and stable electrochemical sensing materials. Among them, AuNPs/g-C3N4 nanocomposites are the most widely used electrochemical modification materials. Xiao et al. [99] found that in Au/N-deficient-C3N4, N vacancy defects and Au nanoparticles have a synergistic catalytic effect, which can be used for high-sensitivity electrochemical detection of Pb(II) and has anti-interference properties. Figure 9a–d show the SWASV responses for the detection of Pb(II), Hg(II), Cu(II), and Cd(II). It can be concluded that the sensitivity of Au/N-deficient-C3N4/GCE towards Pb(II) is the best (Figure 9e). Figure 9f describes the electrocatalytic mechanism of Pb(II) on the sensitive interface modified by three different nanomaterials and clearly illustrates the significance of the synergistic catalytic effect of N vacancies and ~5 nm Au nanoparticles. The N vacancies in g-C3N4 could greatly improve the selective adsorption of Pb(II), and ∼5 nm Au nanoparticles enhanced the catalysis of materials. Chen et al. [93] developed a green method to synthesize AuNPs/mpg-C3N4 nanocomposites for constructing an anti-interference electrochemical sensing interface toward methylmercury, which might be used in the field of the fast screen of methylmercury in food and the environment. In one of their works, the electrochemical sensor constructed as an electrode modification material can directly, quickly, and accurately analyze Cr(VI) in wastewater samples from factories such as leather wastewater and electroplating wastewater [7]. The electrochemical test results yielded 376 ppb of Cr(VI) in TW, which is similar to the ICP-OES result (386 ppb) with a recovery of 97.4%. It is shown that the constructed electrochemical sensor is suitable for the analysis of real water samples in complex situations and has a strong potential for practical application. Mesoporous graphite phase carbon nitride and chloroauric acid were used as photocatalysts and raw materials, respectively, and successfully reduced gold nanoparticles to the surface and interlaminar gaps of mesoporous graphite phase carbon nitride under the irradiation of ultraviolet light (Figure 9g). Figure 9h shows the LSV response of different material modifications to Cr(VI). The peak current of Au/mpg-C3N4/GCE is almost double that of AuNPs/GCE. As shown in Figure 9i,j, a calibration curve in the range 100~1000 ppb is developed using an Au/mpg-C3N4 sensor by the electrochemical method, with the obtained sensitivity and detection limit of Cr(VI) being 0.002196 µA/ppb and 14.7 ppb, respectively. The excellent performance is probably due to the charge transfer between gold nanoparticles and g-C3N4, which induces a synergistic catalytic effect. The optimal UT-g-C3N4/Ag hybrids displayed a faster electron transfer rate in comparison to UT-g-C3N4 and bulk g-C3N4. The preparation of Pt/g-C3N4/polythiophene nanocomposites (Pt/g-C3N4/PTh) as an electrochemically sensitive material for the determination of Hg2+ is presented by Mahmoudian et al. [89]. The results showed an increase in the active sites due to the presence of the g-C3N4 which significantly enhanced the absorption of Hg2+. The presence of PTh and PtNPs compensated for the lower electrical conductivity of the g-C3N4 in the nanocomposite. Nanometer zero-valent iron (nZVI) is one of the most widely used nanomaterials for groundwater and hazardous waste treatment due to its high reduction rate and removal capacity [142]. g-C3N4 can effectively disperse nZVI while adjusting its microstructure, further achieving efficient adsorption and reduction of target pollutants. The results show that G-nZVI has a better affinity for Pb(II) than naked nZVI, mainly depending on the change in microstructure to improve the adsorption capacity of heavy metal ions and synergistically enhance the reaction activity and stability [143]. Meanwhile, the high catalytic capacity of metal nanoparticles is a key factor in increasing the electrochemical performance of metal nanoparticles/g-C3N4 nanocomposites. There will be good prospects in the future for metal nanoparticles/g-C3N4 nanocomposites in electrochemical redox reactions.

4.4.2. Metal Oxide Nanomaterials/g-C3N4 Nanocomposites

Metal oxide nanomaterials have low environmental toxicity and strong biocompatibility. Due to their strong adsorption capacity, larger specific surface area, and better electron transfer kinetics, they have good physical and chemical properties and high-efficiency catalysis. Their original form and combination with other materials have excellent electrochemical properties and are suitable for use as electrode modification materials to achieve the purpose of capturing target pollutants in water with high selectivity. Among the electrode modification materials currently used for electrochemical analysis of heavy metal pollutants, MnO2 [144], ZnO [145], CuO [146], Fe3O4 [147], ZrO2 [148], TiO2 [149], etc., are the most commonly used nano metal oxide materials.
The incorporation of metal oxide materials increases the oxygen vacancies and defects of the composite material, creating key active sites for the catalytic reaction [150]. Wang et al. [151] present a novel method to prepare mesoporous materials via in situ self-assembly of graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets and SiO2 nanoparticles. Combining the advantages of g-C3N4 nanosheets and a mesoporous structure, the as-prepared materials exhibit superior adsorption capabilities for heavy metal ions and organic pollutants. The band gap of g-C3N4 can be reduced by doping CuO, and the electron transfer resistance of the interface can be enhanced. At the same time, the strong coordination mode between the N and Cu atoms at the interface of the CuO-g-C3N4 framework heterojunction is beneficial to improving the electrochemical performance [146]. The CuO/g-C3N4 material prepared by Atacan has remarkable repeatability and good stability for H2O2 electrochemical sensors [152]. As a common semiconductor material, copper sulfide (CuS) can be used as a functional component to improve the electrical properties of matrix materials because its conductivity is comparable to that of metals. Ning et al. [101] successfully prepared a new type of electrochemical sensor based on CuS/g-C3N4/GCE, which can effectively amplify the SWASV signal of Pb2+ (Figure 10b,c). The limit of detection (LOD) for Pb2+ is calculated to be 4.00 nM (S/N = 3). Figure 10a shows the possible reduction mechanism of Pb2+ at the CuS/g-C3N4 interface. The higher response of Pb2+ may be due to the outstanding advantages of this multifunctional composite material: (i) the complementary effect of “dispersibility/electrical conductivity”. (ii) A synergistic enrichment effect of “coordination/adsorption” [101]. In addition, binary transition metal oxides have better catalytic activity and conductivity than single metal oxides. Wang et al. [105] integrated pg-C3N4 and CoMn2O4 into nanocomposite materials and developed a heavy metal ion detection probe with high sensitivity and selectivity (Figure 10d,e). It was observed by SEM and TEM that pg-C3N4 was wrapped on the surface of CoMn2O4 (Figure 10f,g). The pg-C3N4/CoMn2O4 nanocomposite has abundant accessible active sites and a high-efficiency electron transport path, which can realize the selective capture of Cd(II) and Pb(II) (Figure 10h,i). Furthermore, the precise coupling of g-C3N4 with CuCo2O4 can enhance the performance for Hg2+ reduction through the heterostructure formation [153]. Li et al. [154] combined low-pressure ultraviolet (LPUV) photolysis with a ZnO/g-C3N4 photocatalyst to enhance the SWASV signal of heavy metal ions (HMIs). In the analysis of HMIs in real soil extracts, the sensing system achieved an accuracy of 94.9% and 99.8% for the detection of Cd2+ and Pb2+, respectively, which verified the feasibility and validity of the proposed method for environmental applications.
Metal oxide nanoparticle/g-C3N4 nanocomposites have emerged as high-performance materials for the electrochemical detection of heavy metal ions, leveraging the synergistic interplay between g-C3N4’s rich surface chemistry and the catalytic/conductive properties of metal oxides. Among them, metal oxides can enhance redox activity and electron transfer kinetics, enabling ultrasensitive detection via stripping voltammetry [155]. Functional oxides can improve selective adsorption of target ions through electrostatic interactions, ion exchange, or surface complexation. Magnetic oxides enable easy electrode regeneration via external magnetic fields, addressing fouling issues and extending sensor lifespan.

4.4.3. Carbonaceous Nanomaterials/g-C3N4 Nanocomposites

Carbon-based nanomaterials have attracted widespread attention in the field of electrochemical sensors due to their unique properties. Carbon-based nanostructured materials include fullerenes, carbon nanotubes (CNTs), graphene (G) and its derivatives (graphene oxide (GO)), nano-diamonds (NDs), and carbon-based quantum dots (CQDs). Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have high tensile strength and strong hardness, and due to their one-dimensional nanotube structure, their electrical and thermal conductivity have been significantly improved, even surpassing some conductive metals [156]. These excellent properties have important significance for improving the sensitivity of electrochemical sensors.
In the research conducted by Wang et al. [95], the synergistic effect between sulfur-doped C3N4 tube bundles (STBs) with hierarchical pores and graphene nanosheets (Gs) is beneficial for ultra-trace heavy metal ion (HMI) detection and makes the STB/Gs composite a promising sensitive electrochemical sensor for HMIs detection. It can be seen from the TEM image (Figure 11 a–d) that there are many small holes in the tube wall, and these pores promote the rapid diffusion of the HMI solution in the tube bundle structure. The STB/Gs-2 composite is shown in Figure 11e–h. The STB could be seen scattered on the surface of Gs. When STB active sites adsorbed HMIs, Gs could rapidly transfer electrons between STB active sites and electrodes to realize the rapid electrochemical REDOX reaction of HMIs deposition and stripping processes [95]. The SWASV curves of the STB/Gs-2-modified electrode were demonstrated in Figure 11j. The STB/Gs-2-modified electrodes showed that the LOD was 1.17, 0.38, and 0.61 nM for simultaneous detection and 2.30, 0.78, and 1.15 nM for individual detection of Cd2+, Pb2+, and Hg2+. Thin g-C3N4 nanosheets were prepared by acid–base corrosion and an ultrasonic-assisted method, using g-C3N4 NS/RGO to construct an electrochemical sensing interface for the detection of Pb2+ and Cd2+ [157]. The reduced graphene oxide sheet acts as a conductive channel to promote the electron–hole separation and transfer rate in g-C3N4 NS, thereby improving the photocurrent intensity and photocatalytic performance. Studies have shown that the composite of g-C3N4 and CB can create a new synergistic effect while maintaining the characteristics of each material, which can promote the effective detection of toxic heavy metals in the solution [81]. Under visible light conditions, the detection sensitivity of the g-C3N4/CB electrochemical sensor is greatly improved than under dark conditions. The photo-assisted electrochemical sensor has good detection stability and reproducibility and can detect multiple different heavy metal ions at the same time, and the detection limit (LOD) is very low. The performance of carbon nanotubes largely depends on the way they are rolled. Among them, multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) have more excellent properties. In the research of Ramalingam et al. [107], three-dimensional nanocomposites composed of porous graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets (p-g-C3N4-NSs) and oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotubes (O-MWCNTs) were prepared by chemical oxidation (Figure 11k,l). One-step oxidation has two main effects. One is to cause the formation of acidic functional groups on both the basal plane of g-C3N4 and MWCNTs, and the other is that O-MWCNTs bind in situ to the porous structure of p-g-C3N4. In Figure 11m, the nanocomposite material used to modify the screen-printing electrode (SPE) to have good sensitivity and selectivity to heavy metal ions Cd(II), Hg(II), Pb(II), and Zn(II) can be seen. Recently, MOFs have been used as electrode materials to detect HMIs on account of their excellent ability to bind heavy metal ions, high specific surface area, and easy modification. Chen et al. combined the advantages of g-C3N4 and ZIF-8 and developed a g-C3N4@ZIF-8 nanocomposite material, which is suitable as a sensitive material for detecting metal ions and solvents [158]. Chen et al. [97] modified GCE with g-C3N4/CNT/NH2-MIL-88(Fe) as a modifier, and used square wave stripping voltammetry to simultaneously detect Cd2+, Pb2+, Cu2+, and Hg2+. The doping of g-C3N4 in the composite, rich in N-containing functional groups, participates in the adsorption of metal ions on the surface of the electrodes. The porous composite provides accommodation room for metals generated by electro-reduction. The detection limit for Cd2+, Pb2+, Cu2+, and Hg2+ is 39.6 nM, 7.6 nM, 11.9 nM, and 9.6 nM, respectively. In addition, Ti3C2Tx and g-C3N4 are potential complementary materials for the preparation of stable and conductive composite materials, which exhibit excellent electrochemical performance. The protonated g-C3N4/Ti3C2Tx electrode exhibited remarkable sensitivities for the simultaneous detection of Cd2+ (0.05∼1.50 μM) and Pb2+ (0.05∼1.50 μM), and the detection limits of Cd2+ and Pb2+ were 0.001 and 0.0006 μM, respectively [108].
In summary, carbon-based materials enhance the electrochemical performance of g-C3N4 by addressing its inherent limitations, including low electrical conductivity and limited active site accessibility. Key advancements include the following: (1) enhanced conductivity: integration with graphene or CNTs creates conductive networks that accelerate electron transfer kinetics, improving sensitivity in techniques; (2) active site engineering: functionalized carbon materials (e.g., oxygen/nitrogen-doped graphene) coupled with g-C3N4 increase adsorption capacity and catalytic activity for target ions via π–π interactions, electrostatic binding, or chelation. (3) Stability: carbon coatings (e.g., graphitic shells) protect g-C3N4 from oxidative degradation in harsh environments, ensuring long-term operational reliability.

4.4.4. Conductive Polymer/g-C3N4 Nanocomposites

Conducting polymers (CPs), such as polyaniline (PANI), polypyrene (PPy), and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT), have good electrochemical stability and high electrical conductivity, and are widely used in energy storage and electrochromic devices, ion sensing, and biosensors [159,160,161]. The excellent properties of polymer nanocomposites help promote the ability of electron transfer in electrochemical reactions, and they are an ideal material for improving the sensitivity of electrochemical detection [162,163]. In general, conducting polymers are not used alone but are compounded with other materials such as metals, metal oxides, and carbon materials. Wu et al. [106] compounded PEDOT and g-C3N4 to prepare a feasible method for the determination of heavy metal ions. The enhanced electrochemical performance of composite materials mainly depends on the strong synergy of the components. First of all, the use of the BCP method is conducive to the uniform combination of PEDOT and g-C3N4 flakes and strengthens the strong π–π interaction between them. Secondly, the fast charge transfer ability and large surface area of g-C3N4 promote the coordination of g-C3N4 with metal ions. In the work of Eswaran et al. [110], a new, low-cost, high-efficiency nano-engineered poly(melamine)/graphitic-carbon nitride nanonetwork (PM/g-C3N4)-modified screen-printed carbon electrode (SPE) for electrochemical monitoring of toxic HMIs in environmental water is proposed. Using the prepared PM/g-C3N4/ASPE as an environmental sensor, differential pulse voltammetry was used for selective and synchronous electrochemical detection of Pb2+ and Cd2+ ions. The sensor has good sensitivity and selectivity to Pb2+ and Cd2+, with sensitivities of 0.008 μM and 0.02 μM, respectively (Figure 12E–G). In addition, the composite of a D-A-D-conjugated polymer and g-C3N4 can be used as a good electrode modification material for constructing electrochemical sensors for the high-efficiency detection of heavy metal ions. In the work reported by Ding et al. [111], poly(2,5-bis(3,4-ethylenedioxythienyl)pyridine)/graphitic carbon nitride composites (poly(BPE)/g-C3N4) were prepared by an in situ chemical polymerization method and used for simultaneous detection of Cd2+ and Pb2+. The combination of poly(BPE) and g-C3N4 improves the conduction path on the electrode surface, and the conjugation effect between them enhances the adsorption of metal ions. In addition, the prepared modified electrodes can be used to detect Cd2+ and Pb2+ in tap water samples with recoveries of 98.64~106.74% and 99.81~113.15%, respectively. According to the report of Teng et al. [164], EDTA has been covalently immobilized onto CN-NS using N-(trimethoxysilylpropyl) ethylene-diamine triacetic acid sodium salt as a coupling reagent, which has been designed to improve the accumulation performance for Pb (II) onto the electrode surface. Studies have shown that the electrochemical response signal of Pb (II) on EDTA-CN-NS is significantly stronger than that of unfunctionalized CN-NS, and its LOD is 5.7 × 10−13 mol/L. The simultaneous electrochemical detection of Pb (II), Cu (II), and Hg (II) using the EDTA-CN-NS/Nafion/GCE was illustrated as well. In short, conductive polymer-modified graphitic carbon nitride nanocomposites have emerged as promising platforms for the electrochemical detection of heavy metal ions, leveraging the synergistic advantages of both components. Conductive polymers enhance the electrical conductivity, catalytic activity, and stability of g-C3N4, while the latter provides abundant active sites and tunable surface chemistry.
The doping of g-C3N4 is a widely studied strategy to enhance its physicochemical properties for applications in photocatalysis, energy storage, and environmental remediation. The effects of doping of different materials on the properties of g-C3N4 mainly include the following aspects:
(1)
Enhanced photocatalytic performance
By introducing external dopant atoms into g-C3N4, the electronic structure and energy levels can be tuned to enhance photoresponsivity and improve charge separation. Non-metallic doping creates new energy levels within the band gap, which broadens the spectral response and reduces the electron–hole pair complexation rate. Therefore, through strategies such as non-metal doping, co-doping, and vacancy engineering, the photocatalytic performance of g-C3N4 can be enhanced by improving light absorption, facilitating charge separation and transport, and prolonging charge carrier lifetimes [165];
(2)
Improved conductivity and charge transfer capability
The introduction of dopant atoms, on one hand, modifies the electronic structure of g-C3N4, significantly reducing the carrier migration barrier and thereby enhancing its intrinsic conductivity [166]. On the other hand, it creates additional active sites, introduces defects, and further improves conductivity;
(3)
Improved thermal and chemical stability
Dopant atoms can be evenly dispersed in the C3N4 lattice as point defects, which can play a role similar to that of “pinning” and inhibit the expansion of lattice defects, thus improving the chemical stability of the material [167].
In summary, doping tailors g-C3N4’s properties by modifying its electronic structure, surface chemistry, and morphology, making it a versatile material for sustainable technologies. Future work should focus on optimizing dopant selection and understanding structure–property relationships at the atomic level.

5. Conclusions and Prospects

In environmental monitoring, electrochemical sensing methods are one of the most powerful tools. Generally, improving the stability and reliability of the electrochemical sensing interface requires a detailed investigation of the design and development of sensing materials. To achieve this goal, sensing materials need to have excellent adsorption and catalytic properties. In this feature article, we have presented an overview of g-C3N4 and g-C3N4-based nanocomposites: (1) characteristics specific for g-C3N4, (2) electrochemical detection of heavy metal ions, and (3) the application of g-C3N4 and g-C3N4-based nanocomposites in heavy metal detection. G-C3N4 has proven to be one of the most promising candidate materials for electrochemical sensing for designing and fabricating advanced composite catalysts for various applications.
Multifunctional materials will become a feasible direction for environmental safety monitoring in the future. In recent years, various nanomaterials such as precious metals, alloys, carbon materials, metal oxides, and their composites have been widely used in the electrochemical detection of heavy metal ions. Furthermore, in situ field analysis requires the development of portable integrated electrochemical devices and further advancement toward constructing highly integrated miniaturized electrochemical platforms. Currently, progress has been made in portable electrochemical sensors, where g-C3N4 nanocomposites combined with screen-printed electrodes have been preliminarily developed for environmental pollutant monitoring. Meanwhile, utilizing USB-powered electrochemical workstations and capsule-shaped electrochemical workstations configured with carbon electrodes, gold electrodes, and graphene electrodes modified with g-C3N4 nanocomposites enables the detection of specific biomarkers. The detection signals can be wirelessly transmitted via Bluetooth to mobile phones or other display terminals, demonstrating promising potential for real-time monitoring of toxic contaminants in aquatic environments.
Though a large number of studies have been devoted to this field and some significant results have been achieved, some important issues are still worth studying. Firstly, there are still some problems to be solved in the large-scale preparation of g-C3N4 with controllable morphology. Current synthesis methods for g-C3N4 nanostructures (e.g., quantum dots and porous frameworks) often lack reproducibility and scalability. Standardized protocols and cost-effective fabrication techniques (e.g., green chemistry approaches and roll-to-roll manufacturing) are urgently needed for industrial adoption. Secondly, complex environmental matrices (e.g., organic matter and competing ions) often compromise sensor selectivity and accuracy. Developing surface modification strategies or selective recognition elements (e.g., aptamers and ion-imprinted polymers) is essential to enhance anti-interference capabilities. Lastly, balancing ultra-trace detection limits (sub-ppb) with high specificity in multi-ion systems remains challenging, necessitating advanced signal amplification mechanisms or machine learning-assisted data processing. Therefore, future efforts should prioritize surface engineering, interdisciplinary integration (e.g., AI-guided material design), and pilot-scale validation to bridge the gap between laboratory research and practical environmental monitoring applications.
Furthermore, g-C3N4-based sensors offer high sensitivity and selectivity for HMIs, but challenges in scalability, stability, and device integration hinder commercialization. For example, high-quality g-C3N4 requires complex synthesis steps, such as thermal polymerization and exfoliation, which are energy-intensive. Therefore, the production of defect-free nanosheets on an industrial scale remains challenging; prolonged exposure to harsh electrochemical conditions (e.g., acidic media) can degrade g-C3N4 composites, reducing sensor lifespan; most g-C3N4 sensors rely on glassy carbon electrodes (GCEs). Adapting them to wearable or field-deployable formats requires miniaturization and compatibility with flexible substrates, which are underdeveloped. Based on this, innovations can be made in material design (such as defect engineering and hybrid composite materials) and synthesis methods (such as microwave-assisted routes), striving to accelerate the transition from lab-scale prototypes to market-oriented devices.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFE0110100), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21777164), Anhui Provincial Scientific Research Program for Higher Education Institutions (No. 2024AH050568), Anhui Provincial Action Plan for Mid-career and Young Faculty Development in Higher Education Institutions (No. JNFX2024142), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (JZ2024HGQB0096), and the Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant Number GZC20240362).

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lei, P.; Zhou, Y.; Zhao, S.; Dong, C.; Shuang, S. Carbon-supported X-manganate (XNi, Zn, and Cu) nanocomposites for sensitive electrochemical detection of trace heavy metal ions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 435, 129036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Venkateswara Raju, C.; Hwan Cho, C.; Mohana Rani, G.; Manju, V.; Umapathi, R.; Suk Huh, Y.; Pil Park, J. Emerging insights into the use of carbon-based nanomaterials for the electrochemical detection of heavy metal ions. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2023, 476, 214920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Meng, R.; Zhu, Q.; Long, T.; He, X.; Luo, Z.; Gu, R.; Wang, W.; Xiang, P. The innovative and accurate detection of heavy metals in foods: A critical review on electrochemical sensors. Food Control. 2023, 150, 109743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tian, Y.; Liu, J.; Qiao, J.; Ge, F.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, Q. Advancements in Electrochemical Sensing Technology for Heavy Metal Ions Detection. Food Chem. X 2025, 25, 102204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shrivastava, R.; Sharma, N.; Swami, S.; Nair, R.; Singh, A.P. Graphene derived electrochemical sensor for sensing of heavy metal ions: A current overview. Microchem. J. 2025, 209, 112729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, H.; Song, J.; Wang, S.; Song, Q.; Guo, H.; Li, Z. Recent progress in macrocyclic chemosensors for lead, cadmium and mercury heavy metal ions. Dye. Pigment. 2023, 216, 111380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chen, X.; Ke, X.X.; Liu, Y.; Weerasooriya, R.; Li, H.; Wu, Y.C. Photocatalytically induced Au/mpg-C3N4 nanocomposites for robust electrochemical detection of Cr(VI) in tannery wastewater. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nayan Kumar, H.N.; Nagaraju, D.H.; Yhobu, Z.; Shivakumar, P.; Manjunatha Kumara, K.S.; Budagumpi, S.; Praveen, B.M. Recent advances in on-site monitoring of heavy metal ions in the environment. Microchem. J. 2022, 182, 107894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zounr, R.A.; Tuzen, M.; Deligonul, N.; Khuhawar, M.Y. A highly selective and sensitive ultrasonic assisted dispersive liquid phase microextraction based on deep eutectic solvent for determination of cadmium in food and water samples prior to electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry. Food Chem. 2018, 253, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Luo, X.L.; Zhang, W.G.; Han, Y.; Chen, X.M.; Zhu, L.; Tang, W.Z.; Wang, J.L.; Yue, T.L.; Li, Z.H. N,S co-doped carbon dots based fluorescent “on-off-on” sensor for determination of ascorbic acid in common fruits. Food Chem. 2018, 258, 214–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Swanston, T.; Varney, T.; Coulthard, I.; George, G.N.; Pickering, I.J.; Murphy, R.; Cooper, D.M.L. Synchrotron X-ray fluorescence imaging evidence of biogenic mercury identified in a burial in colonial Antigua. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2015, 58, 26–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nehzati, S.; Dolgova, N.V.; Young, C.G.; James, A.K.; Cotelesage, J.J.H.; Sokaras, D.; Kroll, T.; Qureshi, M.; Pickering, I.J.; George, G.N. Mercury Lα1 High Energy Resolution Fluorescence Detected X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy: A Versatile Speciation Probe for Mercury. Inorg. Chem. 2022, 61, 5201–5214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Guo, H.; Niu, C.G.; Zhang, L.; Wen, X.J.; Liang, C.; Zhang, X.G.; Guan, D.L.; Tang, N.; Zeng, G.M. Construction of Direct Z-Scheme AgI/Bi2Sn2O7 Nanojunction System with Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity: Accelerated Interfacial Charge Transfer Induced Efficient Cr(VI) Reduction, Tetracycline Degradation and Escherichia coli Inactivation. Acs Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 8003–8018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sulthana, S.F.; Iqbal, U.M.; Suseela, S.B.; Anbazhagan, R.; Chinthaginjala, R.; Chitathuru, D.; Ahmad, I.; Kim, T.-h. Electrochemical Sensors for Heavy Metal Ion Detection in Aqueous Medium: A Systematic Review. ACS Omega 2024, 9, 25493–25512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhang, S.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, J.; Huang, L.; Yu, S.; Chen, L.; Song, G.; Qiu, M.; Wang, X. Applications of water-stable metal-organic frameworks in the removal of water pollutants: A review. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 291, 118076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zhang, Y.; Xu, Y.; Ma, Y.; Luo, H.; Hou, J.; Hou, C.; Huo, D. Ultra-sensitive electrochemical sensors through self-assembled MOF composites for the simultaneous detection of multiple heavy metal ions in food samples. Anal. Chim. Acta 2024, 1289, 342155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kastro, K.C.; Seo, M.J.; Jeong, H.; Kim, J. Effect of Nanostructures of Au Electrodes on the Electrochemical Detection of As. J. Electrochem. Sci. Technol. 2019, 10, 206–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sun, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhang, H. Sensitive and Stable Electrochemical Sensor for Folic Acid Determination Using a ZIF-67/AgNWs Nanocomposite. Biosensors 2022, 12, 382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bai, X.; Gao, K.; Huang, X.; Qin, C.D.; Zhang, Y.; Han, X. Electrochemical Sensing Characteristics of 3D TiO2 Nanostructures with Different Crystal Structures and Morphologies. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2018, 165, D663–D669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Goswami, B.; Mahanta, D. Fe3O4-Polyaniline Nanocomposite for Non-enzymatic Electrochemical Detection of 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid. Acs Omega 2021, 6, 17239–17246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wei, C.; Wang, Z.; Hu, Y.; Huang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, H.; Liu, Q.; Yu, Z. Layer-by-layer growth of Cu3(HHTP)2 films on Cu(OH)2 nanowire arrays for high performance ascorbic acid sensing. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2024, 255, 116256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rajaji, U.; Chen, T.W.; Chinnapaiyan, S.; Chen, S.M.; Govindasamy, M. Two-dimensional binary nanosheets (Bi2Te3@g-C3N4): Application toward the electrochemical detection of food toxic chemical. Anal. Chim. Acta 2020, 1125, 220–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zheng, H.T.; Ntuli, L.; Mbanjwa, M.; Palaniyandy, N.; Smith, S.; Modibedi, M.; Land, K.; Mathe, M. The Effect of g-C3N4 Materials on Pb(II) and Cd(II) Detection Using Disposable Screen-Printed Sensors. Electrocatalysis 2019, 10, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, Y.; Wen, G.L.; Chen, X.; Weerasooriya, R.; Hong, Z.Y.; Wang, L.C.; Huang, Z.J.; Wu, Y.C. Construction of electrochemical sensing interface towards Cd(II) based on activated g-C3N4 nanosheets: Considering the effects of exfoliation and protonation treatment. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2020, 412, 343–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Shi, X.; Zhang, L.; Jia, G. Hierarchical nitrogen-doped holey graphene as sensitive electrochemical sensor for methyl parathion detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 336, 129721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Amin, H.M.A.; El-Kady, M.F.; Atta, N.F.; Galal, A. Gold Nanoparticles Decorated Graphene as a High Performance Sensor for Determination of Trace Hydrazine Levels in Water. Electroanalysis 2018, 30, 1757–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Patel, M.; Bisht, N.; Prabhakar, P.; Sen, R.K.; Kumar, P.; Dwivedi, N.; Ashiq, M.; Mondal, D.P.; Srivastava, A.K.; Dhand, C. Ternary nanocomposite-based smart sensor: Reduced graphene oxide/polydopamine/alanine nanocomposite for simultaneous electrochemical detection of Cd2+, Pb2+, Fe2+, and Cu2+ ions. Environ. Res. 2023, 221, 115317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tan, Z.; Wu, W.; Feng, C.; Wu, H.; Zhang, Z. Simultaneous determination of heavy metals by an electrochemical method based on a nanocomposite consisting of fluorinated graphene and gold nanocage. Microchim. Acta 2020, 187, 414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cao, Q.; Kumru, B.; Antonietti, M.; Schmidt, B. Graphitic carbon nitride and polymers: A mutual combination for advanced properties. Mater. Horiz. 2020, 7, 762–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, W.; Liu, J.; Zhong, Y.; Li, P.; Zhu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, M.; Yao, S. Single-atom iron nanoatalysts facilitate electrochemiluminescence of graphitic carbon nitride for copper ion sensing. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2024, 417, 136201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kamble, B.B.; Sharma, K.K.; Sonawane, K.D.; Tayade, S.N.; Grammatikos, S.; Reddy, Y.V.M.; Reddy, S.L.; Shin, J.H.; Park, J.P. Graphitic carbon nitride-based electrochemical sensors: A comprehensive review of their synthesis, characterization, and applications. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2024, 333, 103284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ishak, N.; Jeyalakshmi, V.; Setka, M.; Grandcolas, M.; Devadas, B.; Šoóš, M. Upgrading of g-C3N4 semiconductor by a Nitrogen-doped carbon material: A photocatalytic degradation application. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 109381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Qian, W.; Fang, Y.; Liu, H.; Deng, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Diao, Z.; Li, M. Photocatalytic Degradation of Tetracycline Hydrochloride by Mn/g-C3N4/BiPO4 and Ti/g-C3N4/BiPO4 Composites: Reactivity and Mechanism. Catalysts 2023, 13, 1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yan, Y.; Meng, Q.; Tian, L.; Cai, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Y. Engineering of g-C3N4 for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production: A Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 8842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Xu, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhu, L.; An, R.; Qi, Z.; Wu, H.; Miao, T.; Li, L.; Fu, X. Construction and performance of a simple and efficient g-C3N4 photocatalytic hydrogen production system. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 36034–36041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Tong, Z.; Hai, Y.; Wang, B.; Lv, F.; Zhong, Z.; Xiong, R. Activated g-C3N4 Photocatalyst with Defect Engineering for Efficient Reduction of CO2 in Water. J. Phys. Chem. C 2023, 127, 11067–11075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jiang, P.; Wang, K.; Liu, W.; Song, Y.; Zheng, R.; Chen, L.; Su, B. Hot Electrons Induced by Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance in Ag/g-C3N4 Schottky Junction for Photothermal Catalytic CO2 Reduction. Polymers 2024, 16, 2317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Vinoth, S.; Subramani, K.; Ong, W.J.; Sathish, M.; Pandikumar, A. CoS2 engulfed ultra-thin S-doped g-C3N4 and its enhanced electrochemical performance in hybrid asymmetric supercapacitor. J. Colloid Interface science 2021, 584, 204–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Subbiah, M.; Radhakrishnan, A.; Tharmaraj, M.; Lakshmanan, A.; Venkatachalam, S.; Srinivasan, N. Facile synthesis of mesoporous Co3O4 anchoring on the g-C3N4 nanosheets for high performance supercapacitor. J. Alloys Compd. 2024, 1008, 176689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wang, X.X.; Li, X.; Wang, J.Q.; Zhu, H.T. Recent Advances in Carbon Nitride-based Nanomaterials for the Removal of Heavy Metal Ions from Aqueous Solution. J. Inorg. Mater. 2020, 35, 260–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ayodhya, D. A review on recent advances in selective and sensitive detection of heavy toxic metal ions in water using g-C3N4-based heterostructured composites. Mater. Chem. Front. 2022, 6, 2610–2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Amor, C.; Lucas, M.S.; Garcia, J.; Dominguez, J.R.; Beltran De Heredia, J.; Peres, J.A. Combined treatment of olive mill wastewater by Fenton's reagent and anaerobic biological process. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A-Toxic/Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng. 2015, 50, 161–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sehnert, J.; Baerwinkel, K.; Senker, J. Ab Initio Calculation of Solid-State NMR Spectra for Different Triazine and Heptazine Based Structure Proposals of g-C3N4. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 10671–10680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Khabashesku, V.N.; Zimmerman, J.L.; Margrave, J.L. Powder Synthesis and Characterization of Amorphous Carbon Nitride. Chem. Mater. 2000, 12, 3264–3270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Iqbal, O.; Ali, H.; Li, N.; Al-Sulami, A.I.; F Alshammari, K.; Abd-Rabboh, H.S.M.; Al-Hadeethi, Y.; Din, I.U.; Alharthi, A.I.; Altamimi, R.; et al. A review on the synthesis, properties, and characterizations of graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) for energy conversion and storage applications. Mater. Today Phys. 2023, 34, 101080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jiang, R.; Li, W.; Zhu, K.; Ye, W.; Zhu, G.; Jia, G.; Xu, F.; Wang, J.; Tao, T.; Wang, Y.; et al. TiO2/β-C3N4 for sunlight-driven overall water splitting. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 920, 166045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhou, X.; Xu, D.; Huang, J.; Tong, S.; Qiao, P.; Zhang, Z. Cryo-Electrochemical Deposition of Gold Single Atoms on G-C3N4 for Photoelectrochemical Water Reduction. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, S.; Gu, P.; Ma, R.; Luo, C.; Wen, T.; Zhao, G.; Cheng, W.; Wang, X. Recent developments in fabrication and structure regulation of visible-light-driven g-C3N4-based photocatalysts towards water purification: A critical review. Catal. Today 2019, 335, 65–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liu, J.; Hua, E. High Photocatalytic Activity of Heptazine-Based g-C3N4/SnS2 Heterojunction and Its Origin: Insights from Hybrid DFT. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 25827–25835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Fanchini, G.; Tagliaferro, A.; Conway, N.M.J.; Godet, C. Role of lone-pair interactions and local disorder in determining the interdependency of optical constants of a-CN:H thin films. Phys. Rev. B (Condens. Matter Mater. Phys.) 2002, 66, 195411–195419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Abd El-kader, F.H.; Moharram, M.A.; Khafagia, M.G.; Mamdouh, F. Influence of the nitrogen content on the optical properties of CNx films. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2012, 97, 1115–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wang, X.; Maeda, K.; Thomas, A.; Takanabe, K.; Xin, G.; Carlsson, J.M.; Domen, K.; Antonietti, M. A metal-free polymeric photocatalyst for hydrogen production from water under visible light. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 76–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Mittal, D.; Dutta, D.P. Synthesis, structure, and selected photocatalytic applications of graphitic carbon nitride: A review. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2021, 32, 18512–18543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Xue, B.; Chen, Y.; Hong, Y.; Ma, D.-Y.; Xu, J.; Li, Y.-X. Facile synthesis of Fe-containing graphitic carbon nitride materials and their catalytic application in direct hydroxylation of benzene to phenol. Chin. J. Catal. 2018, 39, 1263–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhu, J.; Xiao, P.; Li, H.; Carabineiro, S.A.C. Graphitic Carbon Nitride: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications in Catalysis. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 16449–16465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Sun, X.; Shi, Y.; Lu, J.; Shi, W.; Guo, F. Template-free self-assembly of three-dimensional porous graphitic carbon nitride nanovesicles with size-dependent photocatalytic activity for hydrogen evolution. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2022, 606, 154841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Yang, F.; Ding, G.; Wang, J.; Liang, Z.; Gao, B.; Dou, M.; Xu, C.; Li, S. Self-cleaning, antimicrobial, and antifouling membrane via integrating mesoporous graphitic carbon nitride into polyvinylidene fluoride. J. Membr. Sci. 2020, 606, 118146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhu, C.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Xu, F.; Xian, Q.; Sun, C.; Tong, Q.; Zou, W.; Duan, X.; Wang, S. CeO2 nanocrystal-modified layered MoS2/g-C3N4 as 0D/2D ternary composite for visible-light photocatalytic hydrogen evolution: Interfacial consecutive multi-step electron transfer and enhanced H2O reactant adsorption. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 259, 118072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, N.; Cheng, L.; Liao, Y.; Xiang, Q. Effect of Functional Group Modifications on the Photocatalytic Performance of g-C3N4. Small 2023, 19, 2300109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Shen, Y.; Shi, J.; Wang, Y.; Shi, Y.; Shan, P.; Zhang, S.; Hou, J.; Guo, F.; Li, C.; Shi, W. Incorporation of hydroxyl groups and π-rich electron domains into g-C3N4 framework for boosted sacrificial agent-free photocatalytic H2O2 production. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 498, 155774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Thomas, A.; Fischer, A.; Goettmann, F.; Antonietti, M.; Muller, J.O.; Schlogl, R.; Carlsson, J.M. Graphitic carbon nitride materials: Variation of structure and morphology and their use as metal-free catalysts. J. Mater. Chem. 2008, 18, 4893–4908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Reddy, I.N.; Jayashree, N.; Manjunath, V.; Kim, D.; Shim, J. Photoelectrochemical Studies on Metal-Doped Graphitic Carbon Nitride Nanostructures under Visible-Light Illumination. Catalysts 2020, 10, 983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Karimi-Nazarabad, M.; Goharshadi, E.K.; Mahdizadeh, S.J. Efficient Photoelectrocatalytic Water Oxidation by Palladium Doped g-C3N4 Electrodeposited Thin Film. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 26106–26115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Yuan, Y.J.; Shen, Z.K.; Wu, S.T.; Su, Y.B.; Pei, L.; Ji, Z.G.; Ding, M.Y.; Bai, W.F.; Chen, Y.F.; Yu, Z.T.; et al. Liquid exfoliation of g-C3N4 nanosheets to construct 2D-2D MoS2/g-C3N4 photocatalyst for enhanced photocatalytic H2 production activity. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2019, 246, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zhang, S.; Liu, Y.; Gu, P.; Ma, R.; Wen, T.; Zhao, G.; Li, L.; Ai, Y.; Hu, C.; Wang, X. Enhanced photodegradation of toxic organic pollutants using dual-oxygen-doped porous g-C3N4: Mechanism exploration from both experimental and DFT studies. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 2019, 248, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Wang, L.Q.; Tong, Y.Y.; Feng, J.M.; Hou, J.G.; Li, J.; Hou, X.G.; Liang, J. G-C3N4-based films: A rising star for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Sustain. Mater. Technol. 2019, 19, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Du, J.Y.; Fan, Y.F.; Gan, X.R.; Dang, X.M.; Zhao, H.M. Three-dimension branched crystalline carbon nitride: A high efficiency photoelectrochemical sensor of trace Cu2+ detection. Electrochim. Acta 2020, 330, 135336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Bu, Y.; Chen, Z.; Yu, J.; Li, W. A novel application of g-C3N4 thin film in photoelectrochemical anticorrosion. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 88, 294–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Su, F.; Mathew, S.C.; Lipner, G.; Fu, X.; Antonietti, M.; Blechert, S.; Wang, X. mpg-C3N4-Catalyzed Selective Oxidation of Alcohols Using O2 and Visible Light. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 16299–16301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Cui, M.; Cui, K.; Liu, X.; Shi, J.; Chen, X.; Chen, Y. Synergistic effect of mesoporous graphitic carbon nitride and peroxydisulfate in visible light-induced degradation of atenolol: A combined experimental and theoretical study. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 412, 127979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Cai, W.; Shi, Y.; Wu, D.; Li, J.; Xu, L.; Kong, Y. A dual-signal ECL-RET immunosensor based on VC-g-C3N4 and Ru-Zr-MOF for the detection of β2-MG. Microchem. J. 2024, 201, 110539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wang, M.; Fu, R.; Jin, C.; Li, Z.; Sun, J.; Yu, P.; You, M. The facile fabrication of g-C3N4 ultrathin nanosheets with higher specific surface areas for highly sensitive detection of trace cadmium. Measurement 2019, 140, 548–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. GadelHak, Y.; Hafez, S.H.M.; Mohamed, H.F.M.; Abdel-Hady, E.E.; Mahmoud, R. Nanomaterials-modified disposable electrodes and portable electrochemical systems for heavy metals detection in wastewater streams: A review. Microchem. J. 2023, 193, 109043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Bansod, B.; Kumar, T.; Thakur, R.; Rana, S.; Singh, I. A review on various electrochemical techniques for heavy metal ions detection with different sensing platforms. Biosens Bioelectron 2017, 94, 443–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Cao, R.; Liu, X.; Yang, C.; Wu, J. Detection of Trace Hg(II) in Cosmetics and Aqueous Solution by a Gold Nanospikes Electrochemical Sensor. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2023, 170, 037510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Liu, Y.; Lv, X.-X.; Bao, Q.-X.; Cui, K.-P.; Chen, X. Carbon-coated Fe3O4 derived from metal-organic frameworks on reduced graphene as electrochemical sensor platform for Hg(II) determination. Microchem. J. 2024, 205, 111355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Cui, L.; Wu, J.; Ju, H. Electrochemical sensing of heavy metal ions with inorganic, organic and bio-materials. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015, 63, 276–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Abbas, A.; Amin, H.M.A. Silver nanoparticles modified electrodes for electroanalysis: An updated review and a perspective. Microchem. J. 2022, 175, 107166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Chen, Z.S.; Zhang, S.; Liu, Y.; Alharbi, N.S.; Rabah, S.O.; Wang, S.H.; Wang, X.X. Synthesis and fabrication of g-C3N4-based materials and their application in elimination of pollutants. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 731, 139054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Shen, C.; Chen, C.; Wen, T.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, X.; Xu, A. Superior adsorption capacity of g-C3N4 for heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015, 456, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Hu, J.; Li, Z.; Zhai, C.; Zeng, L.; Zhu, M. Photo-assisted simultaneous electrochemical detection of multiple heavy metal ions with a metal-free carbon black anchored graphitic carbon nitride sensor. Anal. Chim. Acta 2021, 1183, 338951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Zheng, J.; Rahim, M.A.; Tang, J.; Allioux, F.-M.; Kalantar-Zadeh, K. Post-Transition Metal Electrodes for Sensing Heavy Metal Ions by Stripping Voltammetry. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2022, 7, 2100760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Kumar, P.; Boukherroub, R.; Shankar, K. Sunlight-driven water-splitting using two-dimensional carbon based semiconductors. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 12876–12931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Li, Q.; Wen, N.; Zhang, W.; Yu, L.; Shen, J.; Li, S.; Lv, Y. Preparation of g-C3N4/TCNQ Composite and Photocatalytic Degradation of Pefloxacin. Micromachines 2023, 14, 941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Oseghe, E.O.; Akpotu, S.O.; Mombeshora, E.T.; Oladipo, A.O.; Ombaka, L.M.; Maria, B.B.; Idris, A.O.; Mamba, G.; Ndlwana, L.; Ayanda, O.S.; et al. Multi-dimensional applications of graphitic carbon nitride nanomaterials—A review. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 344, 117820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Huang, D.; Yan, X.; Yan, M.; Zeng, G.; Zhou, C.; Wan, J.; Cheng, M.; Xue, W. Graphitic Carbon Nitride-Based Heterojunction Photoactive Nanocomposites: Applications and Mechanism Insight. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 21035–21055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Wang, W.L.; Zhao, J.M.; Sun, Y.Y.; Zhang, H. Facile synthesis of g-C3N4 with various morphologies for application in electrochemical detection. Rsc Adv. 2019, 9, 7737–7746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Gao, W.Y.; Wang, X.F.; Li, P.; Wu, Q.T.; Qi, F.; Wu, S.M.; Yu, Y.; Ding, K.J. Highly sensitive and selective detection of cadmium with a graphite carbon nitride nanosheets/Nafion electrode. Rsc Adv. 2016, 6, 113570–113575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Mahmoudian, M.R.; Basirun, W.J.; Alias, Y.; MengWoi, P. Investigating the effectiveness of g-C3N4 on Pt/g-C3N4/polythiophene nanocomposites performance as an electrochemical sensor for Hg2+ detection. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 104204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Hatamie, A.; Jalilian, P.; Rezvani, E.; Kakavand, A.; Simchi, A. Fast and ultra-sensitive voltammetric detection of lead ions by two-dimensional graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) nanolayers as glassy carbon electrode modifier. Measurement 2019, 134, 679–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Zou, J.; Mao, D.; Arramel; Li, N.; Jiang, J. Reliable and selective lead-ion sensor of sulfur-doped graphitic carbon nitride nanoflakes. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 506, 144672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Hu, J.Y.; Li, Z.; Zhai, C.Y.; Wang, J.F.; Zeng, L.X.; Zhu, M.S. Plasmonic photo-assisted electrochemical sensor for detection of trace lead ions based on Au anchored on two-dimensional g-C3N4/graphene nanosheets. Rare Met. 2021, 40, 1727–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Chen, X.; Liu, Y.; Ke, X.X.; Weerasooriya, R.; Li, H.; Wang, L.C.; Wu, Y.C. A green method to synthesize AuNPs/mpg-C3N4 nanocomposites for constructing anti-interference electrochemical sensing interface toward methylmercury. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 853, 157365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Chen, X.; Sun, X.T.; Cui, M.S.; Liu, Y.; Cui, K.P.; Weerasooriya, R. Electrochemical determination of methylmercury via modulating bandgap of sulfur doped graphitic carbon nitride. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Wang, J.; Yu, P.; Kan, K.; Lv, H.; Liu, Z.; Sun, B.; Bai, X.; Chen, J.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, K. Efficient ultra-trace electrochemical detection of Cd2+, Pb2+ and Hg2+ based on hierarchical porous S-doped C3N4 tube bundles/graphene nanosheets composite. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 420, 130317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Zhai, Y.; Shi, Y.; Feng, Y.; Chen, S.; Wang, S. An Electrochemical Sensor Based On 2D Graphitic-phase Carbon Nitride Nanosheets Doped With FeP-C Nanospheres for the Detection of Cu2+ in Meat. Food Anal. Methods 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Chen, S.; Yu, J.; Chen, Z.; Huang, Z.; Song, Y. Simultaneous electrochemical sensing of heavy metal ions based on a g-C3N4/CNT/NH2-MIL-88(Fe) nanocomposite. Anal. Methods 2021, 13, 5830–5837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Fu, R.; Yu, P.; Wang, M.; Sun, J.; Chen, D.; Jin, C.; Li, Z. The research of lead ion detection based on rGO/g-C3N4 modified glassy carbon electrode. Microchem. J. 2020, 157, 105076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Xiao, X.Y.; Chen, S.H.; Li, S.S.; Wang, J.; Zhou, W.Y.; Huang, X.J. Synergistic catalysis of N vacancies and similar to 5 nm Au nanoparticles promoted the highly sensitive electrochemical determination of lead(ii) using an Au/N-deficient-C3N4 nanocomposite. Environ. Sci.-Nano 2019, 6, 1895–1908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Yang, Z.H.; Wu, X.Y.; Liu, X.C.; Xu, M.M. One-step Bridging of g-C3N4 and Graphene Oxide by Successive Electrolysis for Constructing Electrochemical Sensor of Pb2+. Chin. J. Anal. Chem. 2021, 49, e21179–e21186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Ning, J.; Wei, J.; Huang, S.; Wang, F.; Luo, X.; Sun, C.; Chen, D.; Wei, R.; Sha, L.; Liu, Y. A high performance Pb(ii) electrochemical sensor based on spherical CuS nanoparticle anchored g-C3N4. Anal. Methods 2021, 13, 5617–5627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Akhtar, M.; Sohail, M.; Farooq Warsi, M.; Ibrahim, M.M.; Amin, M.A.; Shahid, M. Fe3O4 nanochips loaded MXenes/g-C3N4 nanocomposite for ultrasensitive electrochemical detection of zinc (II), cadmium (II), lead (II), copper (II) and mercury (II) metal ions. FlatChem 2023, 41, 100537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Han, J.; Fu, R.; Jin, C.; Li, Z.; Wang, M.; Yu, P.; Xie, Y. Highly sensitive detection of trace Hg2+ via PdNPs/g-C3N4 nanosheet-modified electrodes using DPV. Microchem. J. 2020, 152, 104356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Chen, J.; Zhao, J.; Feng, R.; Ma, H.; Wang, H.; Ren, X.; Wei, Q.; Ju, H. Competitive photoelectrochemical aptamer sensor based on a Z-scheme Fe2O3/g-C3N4 heterojunction for sensitive detection of lead ions. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 459, 132122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Wang, Y.; Nie, Z.G.; Li, X.Y.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, H. Highly sensitive and selective electrochemical sensor based on porous graphitic carbon nitride/CoMn2O4 nanocomposite toward heavy metal ions. Sens. Actuators B-Chem. 2021, 346, 130539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Wu, W.; Ali, A.; Jamal, R.; Abdulla, M.; Bakri, T.; Abdiryim, T. A bromine-catalysis-synthesized poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/graphitic carbon nitride electrochemical sensor for heavy metal ion determination. Rsc Adv. 2019, 9, 34691–34698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Ramalingam, M.; Ponnusamy, V.K.; Sangilimuthu, S.N. A nanocomposite consisting of porous graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets and oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotubes for simultaneous stripping voltammetric determination of cadmium(II), mercury(II), lead(II) and zinc(II). Microchim. Acta 2019, 186, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Lv, X.; Pei, F.; Feng, S.; Wu, Y.; Chen, S.-M.; Han, Q.; Lei, W. Facile Synthesis of Protonated Carbon Nitride/Ti3C2Tx Nanocomposite for Simultaneous Detection of Pb2+ and Cd2+. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167, 067509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Lv, H.; Teng, Z.; Wang, S.; Feng, K.; Wang, X.; Wang, C.; Wang, G. Voltammetric simultaneous ion flux measurements platform for Cu2+, Pb2+ and Hg2+ near rice root surface: Utilizing carbon nitride heterojunction film modified carbon fiber microelectrode. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 256, 98–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Eswaran, M.; Tsai, P.C.; Wu, M.T.; Ponnusamy, V.K. Novel nano-engineered environmental sensor based on polymelamine/graphitic-carbon nitride nanohybrid material for sensitive and simultaneous monitoring of toxic heavy metals. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 418, 126267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Ding, S.; Ali, A.; Jamal, R.; Xiang, L.; Zhong, Z.P.; Abdiryim, T. An Electrochemical Sensor of Poly(EDOT-pyridine-EDOT)/Graphitic Carbon Nitride Composite for Simultaneous Detection of Cd2+ and Pb2+. Materials 2018, 11, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Singh, G.; Maria Ruban, A.; Kaur, H.; Patel, V.; Ismaili, A.A.; Bahadur, R.; Vinu, A. High Surface Area Nanoporous Carbon-Ceria Composites for CO2 Capture and Enzyme-Mimicking Action. Chem. Asian J. 2024, 19, e202400994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Kasare, P.K.; Wang, S.-F. Hydrothermally Synthesized Cerium Phosphate with Functionalized Carbon Nanofiber Nanocomposite for Enhanced Electrochemical Detection of Hypoxanthine. Chemosensors 2024, 12, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Ge, M.; Jia, Z.; Jiang, Q.; Ying, G.; Yang, Y.; Wu, S.; Goto, T.; Zhang, J. Highly-permeable and antifouling thin-film nanocomposite reverse osmosis membrane: Beneficial effects of 1D/2D g-C3N4 nanohybrids. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 108902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Shin, H.; Jung, W.G.; Kim, D.H.; Jang, J.S.; Kim, Y.H.; Koo, W.T.; Bae, J.; Park, C.; Cho, S.H.; Kim, B.J.; et al. Single-Atom Pt Stabilized on One-Dimensional Nanostructure Support via Carbon Nitride/SnO2 Heterojunction Trapping. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 11394–11405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Chen, P.; Huang, T.; Wei, T.; Ding, B.; Dou, H.; Zhang, X. Enhanced Transformation Kinetics of Polysulfides Enabled by Synergistic Catalysis of Functional Graphitic Carbon Nitride for High-Performance Li-S Batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Wang, Y.; Yang, X.; Tian, T.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Xu, G.; Gu, L.; Li, H.; Yuan, Y. Chitosan-assisted synthesis of 1D g-C3N4 nanorods for enhanced photocatalysis. Chem. Commun. 2023, 59, 10528–10531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Lv, J.; Feng, S.; Ding, Y.; Chen, C.; Zhang, Y.; Lei, W.; Hao, Q.; Chen, S.M. A high-performance fluorescent probe for dopamine detection based on g-C3N4 nanofibers. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 2019, 212, 300–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Tian, J.; Liu, Q.; Asiri, A.M.; Sun, X.; He, Y. Ultrathin graphitic C3N4 nanofibers: Hydrolysis-driven top-down rapid synthesis and application as a novel fluorosensor for rapid, sensitive, and selective detection of Fe3+. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 216, 453–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Zheng, Y.; Lin, L.; Ye, X.; Guo, F.; Wang, X. Helical graphitic carbon nitrides with photocatalytic and optical activities. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2014, 53, 11926–11930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Das, D.; Banerjee, D.; Das, N.S.; Das, B.; Ghorai, U.K.; Chattopadhyay, K.K. Low temperature synthesis of graphitic carbon nitride nanorods for heavy metal ions sensing. Solid State Sci. 2018, 82, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Eid, K.; Lu, Q.; Abdel-Azeim, S.; Soliman, A.; Abdullah, A.M.; Abdelgwad, A.M.; Forbes, R.P.; Ozoemena, K.I.; Varma, R.S.; Shibl, M.F. Highly exfoliated Ti3C2Tx MXene nanosheets atomically doped with Cu for efficient electrochemical CO2 reduction: An experimental and theoretical study. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 1965–1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Maślana, K.; Kaleńczuk, R.J.; Zielińska, B.; Mijowska, E. Synthesis and Characterization of Nitrogen-doped Carbon Nanotubes Derived from g-C3N4. Materials 2020, 13, 1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Fang, W.; Huang, L.; Zaman, S.; Wang, Z.; Han, Y.; Xia, B.Y. Recent Progress on Two-dimensional Electrocatalysis. Chem. Res. Chin. Univ. 2020, 36, 611–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Wang, Y.; Liu, L.; Ma, T.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, H. 2D Graphitic Carbon Nitride for Energy Conversion and Storage. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2102540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Jing, W.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhu, Y.; Lv, Y.; Bi, W.; Chen, D.D.Y. Sorbent and solvent co-enhanced direct analysis in real time-mass spectrometry for high-throughput determination of trace pollutants in water. Talanta 2020, 208, 120378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Tan, C.; Cao, X.; Wu, X.-J.; He, Q.; Yang, J.; Zhang, X.; Chen, J.; Zhao, W.; Han, S.; Nam, G.-H.; et al. Recent Advances in Ultrathin Two-Dimensional Nanomaterials. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 6225–6331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Yang, S.B.; Gong, Y.J.; Zhang, J.S.; Zhan, L.; Ma, L.L.; Fang, Z.Y.; Vajtai, R.; Wang, X.C.; Ajayan, P.M. Exfoliated Graphitic Carbon Nitride Nanosheets as Efficient Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Under Visible Light. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 2452–2456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Choi, H.; Surendran, S.; Sim, Y.; Je, M.; Janani, G.; Choi, H.; Kim, J.K.; Sim, U. Enhanced electrocatalytic full water-splitting reaction by interfacial electric field in 2D/2D heterojunction. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 450, 137789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Zhang, J.L.; Zhu, Z.W.; Di, J.W.; Long, Y.M.; Li, W.F.; Tu, Y.F. A Sensitive Sensor for trace Hg2+ Determination Based on Ultrathin g-C3N4 Modified Glassy Carbon Electrode. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 186, 192–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Sadhukhan, M.; Barman, S. Bottom-up fabrication of two-dimensional carbon nitride and highly sensitive electrochemical sensors for mercuric ions. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 2752–2756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. She, X.; Xu, H.; Xu, Y.; Yan, J.; Xia, J.; Xu, L.; Song, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Li, H. Exfoliated graphene-like carbon nitride in organic solvents: Enhanced photocatalytic activity and highly selective and sensitive sensor for the detection of trace amounts of Cu2+. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 2563–2570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Vinu, A.; Ariga, K.; Mori, T.; Nakanishi, T.; Hishita, S.; Golberg, D.; Bando, Y. Preparation and characterization of well-ordered hexagonal mesoporous carbon nitride. Adv. Mater. 2005, 17, 1648–1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Nazari, M.; Rahmanifar, M.S.; Noori, A.; Li, W.; Zhang, C.; Mousavi, M.F. The ordered mesoporous carbon nitride-graphene aerogel nanocomposite for high-performance supercapacitors. J. Power Sources 2021, 494, 229741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Lakhi, K.S.; Cha, W.S.; Joseph, S.; Wood, B.J.; Aldeyab, S.S.; Lawrence, G.; Choy, J.-H.; Vinu, A. Cage type mesoporous carbon nitride with large mesopores for CO2 capture. Catal. Today 2015, 243, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Mane, G.P.; Dhawale, D.S.; Anand, C.; Ariga, K.; Ji, Q.; Wahab, M.A.; Mori, T.; Vinu, A. Selective sensing performance of mesoporous carbon nitride with a highly ordered porous structure prepared from 3-amino-1,2,4-triazine. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 2913–2920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Hartmann, M.; Vinu, A. Mechanical Stability and Porosity Analysis of Large-Pore SBA-15 Mesoporous Molecular Sieves by Mercury Porosimetry and Organics Adsorption. Langmuir 2002, 18, 8010–8016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Li, H.; Wang, L.; Liu, Y.; Lei, J.; Zhang, J. Mesoporous graphitic carbon nitride materials: Synthesis and modifications. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2016, 42, 3979–3998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Wang, Z.W.; Liu, H.J.; Li, C.Y.; Chen, X.; Weerasooriya, R.; Wei, J.; Lv, J.; Lv, P.; Wu, Y.C. Mesoporous g-C3N4/beta-CD nanocomposites modified glassy carbon electrode for electrochemical determination of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene. Talanta 2020, 208, 120410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Zhao, S.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, Y.; Qiu, K.; Zhang, C.; Fang, J.; Sheng, X. Facile one-step synthesis of hollow mesoporous g-C3N4 spheres with ultrathin nanosheets for photoredox water splitting. Carbon 2018, 126, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Tang, L.; Wang, Y.; Yu, W.; Dong, Y.; Hasebe, Y. Silver nanoparticles doped three-dimensional hydrogel for electrochemical simultaneous sensing of heavy metal ions. Microchem. J. 2025, 208, 112304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Jiang, W.; Dionysiou, D.D.; Kong, M.; Liu, Z.; Sui, Q.; Lyu, S. Utilization of formic acid in nanoscale zero valent iron-catalyzed Fenton system for carbon tetrachloride degradation. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 380, 122537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Tang, C.; Ling, L.; Zhang, W.-x. Pb(II) deposition-reduction-growth onto iron nanoparticles induced by graphitic carbon nitride. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 387, 124088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Sha, H.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Ke, H.; Xiong, X.; Jia, N. Electrochemiluminescence resonance energy transfer biosensor between the glucose functionalized MnO2 and g-C3N4 nanocomposites for ultrasensitive detection of concanavalin A. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 124–125, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Yin, J.H.; Chen, X.H.; Chen, Z.D. Quenched electrochemiluminescence sensor of ZnO@g-C3N4 modified glassy carbon electrode for fipronil determination. Microchem. J. 2019, 145, 295–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Zou, J.; Wu, S.; Liu, Y.; Sun, Y.; Cao, Y.; Hsu, J.P.; Shen Wee, A.T.; Jiang, J. An ultra-sensitive electrochemical sensor based on 2D g-C3N4/CuO nanocomposites for dopamine detection. Carbon 2018, 130, 652–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Ponnaiah, S.K.; Prakash, P.; Vellaichamy, B.; Paulmony, T.; Selvanathan, R. Picomolar-level electrochemical detection of thiocyanate in the saliva samples of smokers and non-smokers of tobacco using carbon dots doped Fe3O4 nanocomposite embedded on g-C3N4 nanosheets. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 283, 914–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Zarei, M. Sensitive visible light-driven photoelectrochemical aptasensor for detection of tetracycline using ZrO2/g-C3N4 nanocomposite. Sens. Int. 2020, 1, 100029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Song, J.; Huang, M.; Jiang, N.; Zheng, S.; Mu, T.; Meng, L.; Liu, Y.; Liu, J.; Chen, G. Ultrasensitive detection of amoxicillin by TiO2-g-C3N4@AuNPs impedimetric aptasensor: Fabrication, optimization, and mechanism. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 391, 122024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Alaghmandfard, A.; Ghandi, K. A Comprehensive Review of Graphitic Carbon Nitride (g-C3N4)–Metal Oxide-Based Nanocomposites: Potential for Photocatalysis and Sensing. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Wang, Z.H.; Chen, L.; Du, X.R.; Zou, G.J.; Wang, X.L. A “pillared” process to construct graphitic carbon nitride based functionalized mesoporous materials. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 15605–15609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Atacan, K.; Özacar, M. Construction of a non-enzymatic electrochemical sensor based on CuO/g-C3N4 composite for selective detection of hydrogen peroxide. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2021, 266, 124527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Alshaikh, H.; Shawky, A.; Roselin, L.S. Templated synthesis of CuCo2O4-modified g-C3N4 heterojunctions for enhanced photoreduction of Hg2+ under visible light. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2021, 132, 104114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Li, H.N.; He, R.J.; Liu, N.; Feng, L.Y.; Chen, S.W.; Wang, H.; Lv, C.; Chen, X.Y.; Liu, G.; Zhao, G. ZnO/g-C3N4 photocatalyst activated by low-pressure ultraviolet for restoring the SWASV signals: A fast pretreatment method for electrochemically detecting Cd2+ and Pb2+ in soil extracts. Environ. Pollut. 2024, 354, 124183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. dos Santos, W.T.P.; Amin, H.M.A.; Compton, R.G. A nano-carbon electrode optimized for adsorptive stripping voltammetry: Application to detection of the stimulant selegiline in authentic saliva. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2019, 279, 433–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Dong, H.; Lu, M.; Wang, Y.; Tang, H.L.; Wu, D.; Sun, X.; Zhang, F.M. Covalently anchoring covalent organic framework on carbon nanotubes for highly efficient electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2022, 303, 120897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Liu, Y.M.; Zhang, X.; Wang, J.P.; Yang, P. Preparation of luminescent graphitic C3N4 NS and their composites with RGO for property controlling. Rsc Adv. 2016, 6, 112581–112588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Chen, W.; Kong, S.; Wang, J.; Du, L.P.; Cai, W.; Wu, C.S. Enhanced fluorescent effect of graphitic C3N4@ZIF-8 nanocomposite contribute to its improved sensing capabilities. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 3734–3739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Perepichka, I.F.; Besbes, M.; Levillain, E.; Sallé, M.; Roncali, J. Hydrophilic Oligo(oxyethylene)-Derivatized Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophenes):  Cation-Responsive Optoelectroelectrochemical Properties and Solid-State Chromism. Chem. Mater. 2002, 14, 449–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Zhou, Q.Q.; Shi, G.Q. Conducting Polymer-Based Catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 2868–2876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Sassi, M.; Mascheroni, L.; Ruffo, R.; Salamone, M.M.; Pagani, G.A.; Mari, C.M.; D’Orazio, G.; La Ferla, B.; Beverina, L. Exomethylene-3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene (emEDOT): A New Versatile Building Block for Functionalized Electropolymerized Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophenes) (PEDOTs). Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 3502–3505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. John, A.; Benny, L.; Cherian, A.R.; Narahari, S.Y.; Varghese, A.; Hegde, G. Electrochemical sensors using conducting polymer/noble metal nanoparticle nanocomposites for the detection of various analytes: A review. J. Nanostructure Chem. 2021, 11, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Tajik, S.; Beitollahi, H.; Nejad, F.G.; Dourandish, Z.; Khalilzadeh, M.A.; Jang, H.W.; Venditti, R.A.; Varma, R.S.; Shokouhimehr, M. Recent Developments in Polymer Nanocomposite-Based Electrochemical Sensors for Detecting Environmental Pollutants. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2021, 60, 1112–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Teng, Z.Y.; Lv, H.Y.; Wang, L.N.; Liu, L.; Wang, C.Y.; Wang, G.X. Voltammetric Sensor Modified by EDTA-immobilized Graphene-like Carbon Nitride Nanosheets: Preparation, Characterization and Selective Determination of Ultra-Trace Pb (II) in Water Samples. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 212, 722–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Huang, Q.-S.; Li, Q.; Chu, C.; Liu, Q.; Li, Z.; Mao, S. Synergetic regulation of electronic structure of graphitic carbon nitride through phosphorus and carbon co-doping for enhanced photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 482, 149155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Zhang, W.; Chen, M.; Luo, Y.; He, Y.; Liu, S.; Ye, Y.; Wang, M.; Chen, Y.; Zhu, K.; Shu, H.; et al. Utilizing 2D layered structure Cu-g-C3N4 electrocatalyst for optimizing polysulfide conversion in wide-temperature Li-S batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 486, 150411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Du, L.; Gao, B.; Xu, S.; Xu, Q. Strong ferromagnetism of g-C3N4 achieved by atomic manipulation. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 2278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. s-Triazine- (a) and tri-s-triazine-based (b) structures of g-C3N4 [48].
Figure 1. s-Triazine- (a) and tri-s-triazine-based (b) structures of g-C3N4 [48].
Nanomaterials 15 00564 g001
Figure 2. (a) Density-functional−theory band structure for polymeric melon calculated along the chain (Γ–X direction) and perpendicular to the chain (Y–Γ direction). (b) Ultraviolet−visible diffuse reflectance spectrum of carbon nitrides prepared at different temperatures [52].
Figure 2. (a) Density-functional−theory band structure for polymeric melon calculated along the chain (Γ–X direction) and perpendicular to the chain (Y–Γ direction). (b) Ultraviolet−visible diffuse reflectance spectrum of carbon nitrides prepared at different temperatures [52].
Nanomaterials 15 00564 g002
Figure 3. Multiple functionalities of C3N4 as a catalyst [61].
Figure 3. Multiple functionalities of C3N4 as a catalyst [61].
Nanomaterials 15 00564 g003
Figure 4. Schematic illustration of the general principle of electrochemical sensing of heavy metal ions [77].
Figure 4. Schematic illustration of the general principle of electrochemical sensing of heavy metal ions [77].
Nanomaterials 15 00564 g004
Figure 5. XPS high-resolution spectra of N 1s (a) and C 1s (b) before and after the adsorption of heavy metal ions (Pb(II) and Cu(II)). (c) DPASV curves of Cd2+, Pb2+, and Hg2+ at g-C3N4/CB electrode under dark and visible light irradiation. (d) Scheme of the photo−assisted electrochemical detection of heavy metal ions of g-C3N4/CB electrode [81].
Figure 5. XPS high-resolution spectra of N 1s (a) and C 1s (b) before and after the adsorption of heavy metal ions (Pb(II) and Cu(II)). (c) DPASV curves of Cd2+, Pb2+, and Hg2+ at g-C3N4/CB electrode under dark and visible light irradiation. (d) Scheme of the photo−assisted electrochemical detection of heavy metal ions of g-C3N4/CB electrode [81].
Nanomaterials 15 00564 g005
Figure 6. (a) Proposed preparation mechanism of g-C3N4 nanofibers; (b) TEM image of bulk g-C3N4; (c) g-C3N4 nanofibers; (d) fluorescence quenching of g-C3N4 nanofibers in the presence of different DA concentrations. The inset figure presents the relationship between F0/F and the concentration of DA. (e) The corresponding linear relationship between F0/F and the concentration of DA [118].
Figure 6. (a) Proposed preparation mechanism of g-C3N4 nanofibers; (b) TEM image of bulk g-C3N4; (c) g-C3N4 nanofibers; (d) fluorescence quenching of g-C3N4 nanofibers in the presence of different DA concentrations. The inset figure presents the relationship between F0/F and the concentration of DA. (e) The corresponding linear relationship between F0/F and the concentration of DA [118].
Nanomaterials 15 00564 g006
Figure 8. mpg-C3N4 (a) and mpg-C3N4/β-CD (b). (c) The N2 adsorption−desorption isotherms and the corresponding pore size distribution curves (inset) of bulk g-C3N4 and mpg-C3N4. (d) mpg-C3N4/β-CD-modified GCE at different concentrations with the response to the blank solution in 0.5 M PBS (pH 7.0). (e) Calibration plot of the peak currents vs. the corresponding TNT concentrations [139]. (f,g) TEM images of CN-E0.08. (h) Formation mechanism of hollow mesoporous carbon nitride spheres [140].
Figure 8. mpg-C3N4 (a) and mpg-C3N4/β-CD (b). (c) The N2 adsorption−desorption isotherms and the corresponding pore size distribution curves (inset) of bulk g-C3N4 and mpg-C3N4. (d) mpg-C3N4/β-CD-modified GCE at different concentrations with the response to the blank solution in 0.5 M PBS (pH 7.0). (e) Calibration plot of the peak currents vs. the corresponding TNT concentrations [139]. (f,g) TEM images of CN-E0.08. (h) Formation mechanism of hollow mesoporous carbon nitride spheres [140].
Nanomaterials 15 00564 g008
Figure 9. SWASV responses and linear equations (inset) for the detection of (a) Pb(II); (b) Hg(II); (c) Cu(II); and (d) Cd(II) with Au/N-deficient-C3N4/GCE (Dashed line: blank). (e) Comparisons of the sensitivity of the three modified electrodes. (f) Synergistic catalysis mechanism toward Pb(II) based on three different nanomaterials modified with GCE. (g) Schematic illustration of the synthesis of the Au/mpg-C3N4 used to construct electrochemical sensors for Cr(VI). (h) The LSV responses for 1000 ppb Cr(VI) with modified GCE at a scan rate of 100 mV/s in 0.1 M HCl. (i) Variation in response current as a function of Cr(VI) concentration as determined by LSV. (j) Calibration curve of Cr(VI) vs. response current [7].
Figure 9. SWASV responses and linear equations (inset) for the detection of (a) Pb(II); (b) Hg(II); (c) Cu(II); and (d) Cd(II) with Au/N-deficient-C3N4/GCE (Dashed line: blank). (e) Comparisons of the sensitivity of the three modified electrodes. (f) Synergistic catalysis mechanism toward Pb(II) based on three different nanomaterials modified with GCE. (g) Schematic illustration of the synthesis of the Au/mpg-C3N4 used to construct electrochemical sensors for Cr(VI). (h) The LSV responses for 1000 ppb Cr(VI) with modified GCE at a scan rate of 100 mV/s in 0.1 M HCl. (i) Variation in response current as a function of Cr(VI) concentration as determined by LSV. (j) Calibration curve of Cr(VI) vs. response current [7].
Nanomaterials 15 00564 g009
Figure 10. (a) Mechanism of the proposed sensor for Pb2+ detection based on the CuS/g-C3N4 electrode. (b) SWASV responses of 0.2 μM Pb2+ at four different working electrodes in the NaAc/HAc buffer solution. (c) SWASV detection of Pb2+ in NaAc/HAc buffer solution with the CuS/g-C3N4/GCE [101]. (d) Schematic illustration of the synthesis process of pg-C3N4/CoMn2O4 nanocomposite. (e) The reduction mechanism of Cd(II) at the electrochemical sensitive interface. SEM images (f) and TEM images (g) of pg-C3N4/CoMn2O4 nanocomposite; (h) SWASV responses at pg-C3N4/CoMn2O4/GCE in 0.1 M HAc-NaAc containing various concentrations of Cd(II). (i) SWASV responses at pg-C3N4/CoMn2O4/GCE in a 0.1 M HAc–NaAc containing various concentrations of Pb(II) (Dashed line: blank).
Figure 10. (a) Mechanism of the proposed sensor for Pb2+ detection based on the CuS/g-C3N4 electrode. (b) SWASV responses of 0.2 μM Pb2+ at four different working electrodes in the NaAc/HAc buffer solution. (c) SWASV detection of Pb2+ in NaAc/HAc buffer solution with the CuS/g-C3N4/GCE [101]. (d) Schematic illustration of the synthesis process of pg-C3N4/CoMn2O4 nanocomposite. (e) The reduction mechanism of Cd(II) at the electrochemical sensitive interface. SEM images (f) and TEM images (g) of pg-C3N4/CoMn2O4 nanocomposite; (h) SWASV responses at pg-C3N4/CoMn2O4/GCE in 0.1 M HAc-NaAc containing various concentrations of Cd(II). (i) SWASV responses at pg-C3N4/CoMn2O4/GCE in a 0.1 M HAc–NaAc containing various concentrations of Pb(II) (Dashed line: blank).
Nanomaterials 15 00564 g010
Figure 11. TEM images of (ad) STB and (eh) STB/Gs-2. (i) Schematic diagram of SWASV process and electron transfer of STB-adsorbed HMIs. (j) Simultaneous detection SWASV curves of STB/Gs-2 modified electrode. (k) HR-TEM images of porous g-C3N4/O-MWCNTs; (l) SAED pattern of porous g-C3N4/O-MWCNTs. (m) DPV response of different modified electrodes in 0.1 M acetate buffer (pH −5.0) containing 0.5 μg L−1 of Hg and 25 μg L−1 of Pb, Cd, Zn metals.
Figure 11. TEM images of (ad) STB and (eh) STB/Gs-2. (i) Schematic diagram of SWASV process and electron transfer of STB-adsorbed HMIs. (j) Simultaneous detection SWASV curves of STB/Gs-2 modified electrode. (k) HR-TEM images of porous g-C3N4/O-MWCNTs; (l) SAED pattern of porous g-C3N4/O-MWCNTs. (m) DPV response of different modified electrodes in 0.1 M acetate buffer (pH −5.0) containing 0.5 μg L−1 of Hg and 25 μg L−1 of Pb, Cd, Zn metals.
Nanomaterials 15 00564 g011
Figure 12. Structural morphology of (A) (i) and (ii) ASPE-PM microcubes, (B) ASPE-PM/g-C3N4, and (C) magnified capture of g-C3N4 in PM nanonetwork. (D) General process and mechanism interaction of ASPE-PM/g-C3N4 with heavy metal ions in environmental water samples. Individual DPV response of the ASPE−PM/g-C3N4 composite-modified electrode of (E) Pb2+ and (F) Cd2+ over a concentration range of 0.1–1.0  µM. (G) Simultaneous DPV response of the ASPE-PM/g-C3N4 nanonetwork modified electrode of Pb2+and Cd2+ over a concentration range of 0.1–1.0  µM [110].
Figure 12. Structural morphology of (A) (i) and (ii) ASPE-PM microcubes, (B) ASPE-PM/g-C3N4, and (C) magnified capture of g-C3N4 in PM nanonetwork. (D) General process and mechanism interaction of ASPE-PM/g-C3N4 with heavy metal ions in environmental water samples. Individual DPV response of the ASPE−PM/g-C3N4 composite-modified electrode of (E) Pb2+ and (F) Cd2+ over a concentration range of 0.1–1.0  µM. (G) Simultaneous DPV response of the ASPE-PM/g-C3N4 nanonetwork modified electrode of Pb2+and Cd2+ over a concentration range of 0.1–1.0  µM [110].
Nanomaterials 15 00564 g012
Table 1. Comparison of the determination performance of electrochemical sensors based on graphite phase carbon nitride in the determination of heavy metal ions.
Table 1. Comparison of the determination performance of electrochemical sensors based on graphite phase carbon nitride in the determination of heavy metal ions.
ElectrodesHMIsMethodsRange of Linearity (μM) Sensitivity (μA·μM−1)LOD (μM)Ref.
g-C3N4/GCPb(II)SWASV0.5~3.510.8870.228[87]
Cu(II)0.5~4.54.7940.103
Hg(II)0.5~4.518.1800.217
g-C3N4/Nafion/GCCd(II)DPASV0.001~100/0.5 × 10−3[88]
g-C3N4 nanosheet/GCCd(II)SWASV0.05~0.722.6683.94 × 10−3[24]
Ultrathin g-C3N4/GCCd(II)SWASV0.001~0.143.90.35 × 10−3[72]
g-C3N4/Pt/PAn NCs/GCHg(II)DPASV0.5~11.07879 × 10−3[89]
g-C3N4 nanosheet/GCPb(II)DPASV0.0075~1.033.081 × 10−3[90]
S-g-C3N4/GCPb(II)DPV0.075~2.50.2203 × 10−3[91]
Au/g-C3N4/rGO/GCPb(II)DPASV0~0.10.6180.1 × 10−3[92]
AuNPs/mpg-C3N4/GCCr(VI)LSV0~19.30.1100.283[7]
AuNPs/mpg-C3N4/GCMeHg(I)DPASV0~0.11661.40.47 × 10−3[93]
S-g-C3N4/Au electrodeMeHg(I)DPASV0~0.116110.00.81 × 10−3[94]
S-g-C3N4 tube bundles/graphene nanosheetsPb(II)SWASV0.025~8.521.6840.78 × 10−3[95]
Hg(II)0.05~7.515.711.15 × 10−3
Cd(II)0.05~510.1322.30 × 10−3
g-C3N4@FeP-C/GCCu(II)DPASV0.05~200.1250.0167[96]
g-C3N4/CNT/NH2-MIL-88(Fe)/GCCd(II)SWSV0.12~6.03.6639.6 × 10−3[97]
Pb(II)0.02~6.019.157.6 × 10−3
Cu(II)0.04~6.012.1511.9 × 10−3
Hg(II)0.03~6.015.109.6 × 10−3
rGO/g-C3N4/GCPb(II)SWASV0.00001~1195.221.07 × 10−6[98]
Au/N-deficient-g-C3N4/GCPb(II)SWASV0.2~0.8184.429 × 10−3[99]
g-C3N4/rGO/GCPb(II)SWASV0.05~1.4513.60.72 × 10−3[100]
CuS/g-C3N4/GCPb(II)SWASV0.05~5.00010.8114 × 10−3[101]
Bi/g-C3N4/SPEPb(II)SWASV0.267~1.0674.980.156[23]
Cd(II)0.145~0.5311.7870.039
Ti3C2(HF)/Fe3O4/g-C3N4/GCPb(II)DPASV0.005~0.557.230.12[102]
Cd(II)44.14
Hg(II)48.24
Pd/g-C3N4/GCHg(II)DPV0.05 × 10−3~0.02542.2810.45 × 10−3[103]
Fe2O3/g-C3N4/GCPb(II)PEC3.0 × 10−4~4.840.63.8 × 10−5[104]
g-C3N4/CNT/NH2-MIL-88(Fe)/GCPb(II)SWSV0.02~6.0019.157.6 × 10−3[97]
Cu(II)0.04~6.0012.1511.9 × 10−3
Hg(II)0.03~6.0015.109.6 × 10−3
Cd(II)0.12~6.003.6639.6 × 10−3
pg-C3N4/CoMn2O4/GCPb(II)SWASV0.2~4.41.6601.4 × 10−3[105]
Cd(II)0.5~7.05.1782.1 × 10−3
Pt/g-C3N4/Polythiophene/GCHg(II)DPV0.01~576.159 × 10−6[89]
PEDOT/g-C3N4/GCPb(II)DPV0.04~11.68.81354.21 × 10−3[106]
Cd(II)DPV0.06~123.06451.4 × 10−3
Porous-g-C3N4/O-MWCNTs/SPEPb(II)DPV0.17 × 10−3~0.53 /0.038 × 10−3[107]
Cd(II)0.038~2.233/0.266 × 10−3
Zn(II)0.064~3.089/0.917 × 10−3
Hg(II)0.024~0.459/0.199 × 10−3
g-C3N4/CB composite electrodeCd(II)DPASV0~0.711.02.1 × 10−3[81]
Pb(II)0~0.39.00.26 × 10−3
Hg(II)0~0.54.00.22 × 10−3
g-C3N4/Ti3C2Tx/GCCd(II)SWASV0.05~1.540.971 × 10−3[108]
Pb(II)0.05~1.549.910.6 × 10−3
P-CN_T60/MWCNT/CFECu(II)DPSV6.6 × 10−6~8.50.0941.0 × 10−7[109]
Pb(II)0.81 × 10−3~8.50.0301.8 × 10−5
Hg(II)0.22 × 10−6~8.50.0218.0 × 10−6
poly(melamine)/g-C3N4/SPEPb(II)DPV0.1~1/8 × 10−3[110]
Cd(II)0.1~1/20 × 10−3
poly(BPE)/g-C3N4/GCCd(II)DPV0.12~7.27.6369.7 × 10−3[111]
Pb(II)0.08~7.211.1403.27 × 10−3
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yin, C.; Liu, Y.; Hu, T.; Chen, X. Graphitic Carbon Nitride Nanomaterials-Based Electrochemical Sensing Interfaces for Monitoring Heavy Metal Ions in Aqueous Environments. Nanomaterials 2025, 15, 564. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15070564

AMA Style

Yin C, Liu Y, Hu T, Chen X. Graphitic Carbon Nitride Nanomaterials-Based Electrochemical Sensing Interfaces for Monitoring Heavy Metal Ions in Aqueous Environments. Nanomaterials. 2025; 15(7):564. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15070564

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yin, Cheng, Yao Liu, Tingting Hu, and Xing Chen. 2025. "Graphitic Carbon Nitride Nanomaterials-Based Electrochemical Sensing Interfaces for Monitoring Heavy Metal Ions in Aqueous Environments" Nanomaterials 15, no. 7: 564. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15070564

APA Style

Yin, C., Liu, Y., Hu, T., & Chen, X. (2025). Graphitic Carbon Nitride Nanomaterials-Based Electrochemical Sensing Interfaces for Monitoring Heavy Metal Ions in Aqueous Environments. Nanomaterials, 15(7), 564. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15070564

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop