Next Article in Journal
Advancements in Laser-Processed Functional Surfaces for Medical Devices: A Current Review
Previous Article in Journal
Synergistic Effect of MWCNT and CB on the Piezoresistive Properties of Laser Ablation Composites Strain Sensors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

High-Performance Cu1.8Se Nanosheets for Dual-Sensing: H2O2 Electrochemical Detection and SERS Substrate

1
Department of Chemical Engineering & Biotechnology, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei City 10608, Taiwan
2
Department of Opto-Electronic Engineering, National Dong Hwa University, Hualien 97401, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2025, 15(13), 998; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15130998 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 27 May 2025 / Revised: 13 June 2025 / Accepted: 23 June 2025 / Published: 27 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Nanoelectronics, Nanosensors and Devices)

Abstract

A facile fabrication method was developed for the growth of Cu1.8Se nanosheets (NSs) on a Cu foil substrate, enabling dual-functionality as an electrochemical sensor for H2O2 and an active surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) substrate. The process involved the preparation of Cu(OH)2 nanowires (NWs) via electrochemical oxidation, followed by chemical conversion to Cu1.8Se through a selenization process. The morphology, composition, and microstructure of the resulting Cu1.8Se NSs were systematically characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The Cu1.8Se NSs exhibited excellent electrocatalytic activity for H2O2 reduction, achieving a notably low detection limit of 1.25 μM and demonstrating rapid response and high sensitivity with a linear relationship in amperometric detection. Additionally, SERS experiments using Rhodamine B as a probe molecule and the Cu1.8Se NS/Cu foil as a substrate displayed outstanding performance, with a detection limit as low as 1 μM. The flower-like structure of the Cu1.8Se NSs exhibited linear dependence between analyte concentration and detection signals, along with satisfactory reproducibility in dual-sensing applications. These findings underscore the scalability and potential of this fabrication approach for advanced sensor development.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Electrochemical sensing and surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) are two powerful analytical techniques that have gained widespread attention for chemical and biological detection. Electrochemical sensors are valued for their high sensitivity, rapid response, and ease of miniaturization, making them highly suitable for real-time and in situ monitoring. SERS, on the other hand, offers ultrasensitive detection through vibrational fingerprinting of molecules, often reaching single-molecule sensitivity under optimized conditions. Integrating these complementary techniques into a dual-mode sensing platform allows for simultaneous electrochemical and spectroscopic analysis, enhancing analytical reliability, accuracy, and detection versatility. Such an integrated approach is highly desirable for next-generation sensors capable of handling complex biological and environmental samples.
Micro- and nanoscale transition-metal chalcogenides (TMCs) have garnered significant attention due to their unique chemical and physical properties, enabling diverse applications in electrochemical energy devices, optical sensors, thermoelectric systems, and memory devices [1,2,3]. Among these, nonstoichiometric copper selenides (CuxSe, x = 1–2) stand out in electrochemical devices, such as water electrolyzers, batteries, and supercapacitors, owing to their exceptional electrocatalytic activity [4,5,6]. This enhanced electrochemical performance of CuxSe is primarily attributed to the reduced electronegativity of anions and the high degree of covalency within the lattice, which collectively contribute to superior electrochemical tunability. Such tunability facilitates the adsorption of reactive intermediates on the CuxSe surface via localized oxidation/reduction processes at the Cu active sites. Furthermore, a reduced bandgap improves the charge transport both at the CuxSe–electrolyte interface and within the composite material [7]. Despite these advantages, the use of CuxSe materials with novel properties for the electrochemical detection of biological materials remains largely unexplored. A straightforward, two-step method was proposed for fabricating Cu1.8Se nanosheets (NSs) on a Cu foil substrate for H2O2 sensing. Initially, Cu(OH)2 nanowires (NWs) were synthesized on the Cu foil via an electrochemical oxidation process. Subsequently, a room-temperature selenization process was carried out in an alkaline solution containing Se and NaBH4, yielding the final Cu1.8Se product, which was directly employed as an electrode for H2O2 detection. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report demonstrating the use of Cu1.8Se NSs for H2O2 sensing.
Cu1.8Se is a self-doped material with a high hole concentration, resulting in localized surface plasmon resonances (LSPR). The coexistence of Cu(I) and Cu(II) in these materials serves as a source of optically active holes, enabling effective tuning of the optical properties via Cu-defect engineering, which can induce a blueshift or redshift in the absorption spectrum [8,9,10]. Additionally, Cu1.8Se exhibits remarkable potential as a surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) substrate due to charge-transfer resonance between chemisorbed molecules and the Cu1.8Se surface. However, studies on the SERS activity of Cu1.8Se substrates remain limited. In this study, we demonstrate the dual functionality of Cu1.8Se NSs as sensitive SERS substrates and efficient electrodes for H2O2 detection. The Cu1.8Se NSs achieved an impressive enhancement factor of 8 × 106 as a SERS substrate and a low detection limit of 1.25 × 10−6 M for H2O2 as an electrochemical electrode. These novel and cost-effective flower-like Cu1.8Se nanostructures not only serve as high-performance SERS substrates and electrochemical electrodes but also pave the way for the development of bio-related sensing devices based on hierarchical nanostructures.

2. Experiment Section

Sodium hydroxide (NaOH, 97%), sodium borohydride (NBH4, 98%), and selenium (Se, 99.999%) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich. Copper foil and zinc foil were purchased from Shanghai Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2, 30–50%) and sulfuric acid (H2SO4, 95%) were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Hampton, NH, USA). All chemicals were of analytical grade and used as received without further purification.
The Cu1.8Se NS on the Cu foil was fabricated via a two-step process of the electrochemical oxidation process for synthesis of Cu(OH)2 NW and then the selenization process for the chemical composition conversion of Cu(OH)2 to Cu1.8Se, as shown in Scheme 1. In the preparation of the Cu(OH)2 NW, a two-electrode system of the Cu foil as a working electrode and a Pt sheet as a counter electrode in a 1 M NaOH solution was utilized. The constant current density of 4.5 mA/cm2 was applied for 20 min. After the reaction, the blue Cu(OH)2 on the Cu foil were cleaned several times by deionized water and subsequent drying in the air. For the selenization process, the Cu(OH)2 NW/Cu foil sample was immersed in a 40 mL aqueous solution containing 5 mM NaOH, 0.015 g of Se, and 0.03 NaBH4 at room temperature for 1, 6, 12, and 24 h. Finally, the sample was washed several times with deionized water and dried under atmospheric conditions. For SERS measurement, the samples were immersed in a solution of Rhodamine B at various concentrations for 1 h. Then, the samples were removed from the solution and rinsed several times with distilled water. For the electrochemical detection of H2O2, the NS samples as working electrodes were measured in a 0.1 M H2SO4 solution with a potentiostat galvanostat (CHI 6273D, CH. Instruments Inc., Bee Cave, TX, USA). A conventional three-electrode system consisting of a square platinum sheet as an auxiliary electrode and a Ag/AgCl reference electrode in a KCl solution (3 M) were implemented. All potentials reported in this article were relative to Ag/AgCl (3 M KCl, 0.197 V vs. SHE).
The morphology of the Cu1.8Se NS/Cu foil was analyzed by a scanning electron microscope (SEM, JEM-4000EX, JEOL (USA) Inc., Peabody, MA, USA). The structure of the samples was examined by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Rigaku D/Max-2500V X-ray Diffractometer, Tokyo, Japan) and the chemical states of the elements were determined with X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS). Raman spectroscopy measurements were performed with a system (LabRAM HR 550, HORIBA, Irvine, CA, USA) equipped with a thermoelectrically cooled multi-channel detector (CCD) with an accuracy of 1 cm−1 and a 100× objective; a He-Ne laser (light power of 5 mW and wavelength of 632.8 nm) served as the excitation source. SERS data were acquired with accumulation for only 30 s for Rhodamine B on the Cu1.8Se NS/Cu foil samples.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characteristics of Cu1.8Se NS/Cu Foil

Figure 1a illustrates the morphology of Cu(OH)2 nanowires (NWs) directly grown on a Cu foil substrate. The one-dimensional nanostructures densely and uniformly cover the Cu foil surface, with most nanowires exhibiting a typical diameter of approximately 120 nm and a length of around 10 μm. Notably, after undergoing the selenization process for durations ranging from 1 h to 24 h, the wire-like morphology gradually disappears, giving way to sheet-like nanoflower structures, as depicted in Figure 1b–h. Each nanosheet measures several microns in width and tens of nanometers in thickness. These findings provide direct evidence for the time-dependent topotactic transformation mechanism, driven by the replacement of hydroxide with selenide ions and the accompanying reconstruction of the crystal lattice. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis (Figure 1i) reveals a Cu/Se composition ratio of approximately 1.8, along with detectable oxygen content attributed to surface oxidation from air exposure. This two-step fabrication process successfully produces dense and uniform flower-like Cu1.8Se nanostructures on the Cu foil substrate.
To investigate the crystal structure of Cu1.8Se synthesized through this two-step process, X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were performed, as shown in Figure 2a. For comparison, the Cu foil substrate was also analyzed. After electrochemical oxidation, the XRD pattern of the light-blue sample reveals peaks (marked with inverted triangles) corresponding to the orthorhombic-phase Cu(OH)2 (JCPDS card No. 72-0140), alongside peaks (marked with circles) from the copper substrate. Following 1 h of selenization, the diffraction pattern exhibits peaks consistent with the cubic-phase Cu1.8Se (JCPDS card No. 71-0044, marked with triangles), along with peaks from the copper substrate and the cubic phase of Cu2O (JCPDS card No. 77-0199, marked with asterisks). With extended selenization time up to 24 h, the diffraction peaks corresponding to Cu1.8Se become more pronounced, while those associated with the Cu2O phase vanish. This confirms the successful conversion of Cu(OH)2 NWs into Cu1.8Se NSs through the selenization process. The possible reaction mechanisms for this transformation are as follows [11]:
8Se + NaBH4 + 8NaOH → 4Na2Se2 + 6H2O + NaBO2
Cu(OH)2 + 2OH → Cu(OH)42−
Cu(OH)42− + NaBH4 + 4OH → Cu+ + 6H2O + NaBO2
1.8Cu+ + Na2Se2 → Cu1.8Se + Na2Se
These reactions collectively enable the transformation of Cu(OH)2 NWs into Cu1.8Se NSs, resulting in the desired hierarchical nanostructures.
The structural transformation of Cu1.8Se NSs and the influence of the selenization treatment were further analyzed using Raman scattering spectroscopy. Figure 2b presents the Raman spectra of Cu1.8Se samples subjected to selenization for 1, 6, 12, and 24 h. After 1 h of selenization, the spectrum is dominated by phonon modes characteristic of the Cu2O phase at 146 and 218 cm−1 [12]. However, as the selenization time increases, these peaks progressively diminish, while new phonon frequencies characteristic of crystalline Cu1.8Se emerge. A prominent peak at 257 cm−1, corresponding to the Cu–Se vibration mode in crystalline Cu1.8Se, becomes evident, aligning well with reported literature values [13]. Upon extending the selenization time to 24 h, the intensity of the 257 cm−1 peak significantly increases, while the phonon modes associated with Cu2O vanish. This indicates an optimal crystallization of Cu1.8Se NSs, consistent with the XRD results. Additionally, the Cu 2p and Se 3d core-level spectra of the Cu1.8Se NS/Cu foil sample were examined via X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), as shown in Figure 2c,d. The high-resolution Cu 2p spectrum reveals two primary peaks at binding energies of 932.3 eV and 952.2 eV, corresponding to Cu⁺ 2p3/2 and Cu⁺ 2p1/2, respectively, indicating the +1 oxidation state in Cu1.8Se. Weak peaks at 933.5 eV and 954.9 eV are also observed, which are attributed to the +2 oxidation state. These findings are consistent with previously reported values for mixed-valent Cu1.8Se materials. The Se 3d spectrum exhibits peaks at binding energies of 53.7 eV and 54.6 eV, corresponding to the Se 3d5/2 and Se 3d3/2 states of Se2− in Cu1.8Se, respectively. These observations confirm the complete conversion of Cu(OH)2 to Cu1.8Se, corroborating the results obtained from XRD and Raman analysis.

3.2. Detection of H2O2 by an Electrochemical Mean

To evaluate the electrocatalytic performance of the Cu1.8Se NS/Cu foil electrode after 24 h of selenization, cyclic voltammetry (CV) was conducted to study H2O2 reduction within the potential range of 0 V to −0.6 V at a scan rate of 50 mV·s−1. Figure 3a shows the CV curves of the Cu1.8Se NS electrode in an H2SO4 solution, both in the absence and presence of H2O2. In the absence of H2O2, the CV curve displays one oxidation peak and one reduction peak, which can be attributed to the redox reaction of the Cu1.8Se NS during the Cu(I)/Cu(II) transition, occurring at approximately −0.4 V vs. Ag/AgCl [14]. Upon the addition of H2O2, both the oxidation and reduction currents increase significantly, indicating a strong electrocatalytic response to H2O2. The mechanism for H2O2 reduction on the Cu1.8Se electrode can be shown in Figure 3b, and the redox cascade reaction is expressed as follows [14]:
Cu1.8Se → CuSe + ne
H2O2 + 2e → 2OH
Notably, as the H2O2 concentration increases to 8 mM, the Cu1.8Se NS electrode exhibits a significant increase in current density from H2O2 reduction, enabling efficient low-potential amperometric detection. These results highlight the excellent electrocatalytic activity of the Cu1.8Se NS, as well as the good accessibility of the nanostructures to analytes and the enhanced electron-transfer efficiency between H2O2 and the Cu1.8Se NS. This demonstrates the potential of the Cu1.8Se NS/Cu foil electrode for effective H2O2 sensing applications. The electrocatalytic activity of the Cu1.8Se NS electrode for H2O2 detection was evaluated using the amperometric I-t method, a widely used technique for electrochemical sensor characterization. To minimize interference from compounds such as ascorbic acid, glucose, and acetaminophen, which can contribute significantly to the anodic current and affect the accurate detection of H2O2 in practical applications, a reduction potential of approximately −0.2 V was selected. Figure 3c shows the amperometric response of the Cu1.8Se NS electrode to successive injections of H2O2 at varying concentrations, recorded at an applied potential of −0.2 V. The corresponding calibration curve is provided in Figure 3d. Distinct and well-defined current responses were observed for each successive addition of H2O2, demonstrating the electrode’s excellent catalytic activity. Following each injection, the catalytic reduction of H2O2 at the Cu1.8Se NS electrode surface rapidly reached dynamic equilibrium, producing a stable current signal within 30 s. These results confirm the stability and efficiency of the Cu1.8Se NS electrode’s catalytic properties. The electrode’s response to H2O2 concentration exhibits a linear range from 1.25 μM to 10 mM, with a high correlation coefficient (R2 = 0.990)) and a sensitivity of 1335 μA mM−1cm−2. Compared to previously reported H2O2 sensors (as detailed in Table 1) [15,16,17,18,19,20], the Cu1.8Se NS electrode demonstrates superior performance. This remarkable performance can be attributed to the hierarchical Cu1.8Se nanostructure, which provides a large surface-to-volume ratio and a high density of finely and uniformly dispersed nanosheets. These structural advantages facilitate efficient electron transfer, thereby enhancing the sensor’s electrocatalytic activity and overall performance in H2O2 detection.
To evaluate the potential impact of interfering species, the anti-interference properties of the Cu1.8Se NS electrode were investigated. These tests involved successive additions of common interfering compounds, including glucose, fructose, uric acid, and ascorbic acid (each at 100 μM), along with H2O2, into the electrolyte. The results, shown in Figure 4a, reveal that the Cu1.8Se NS electrode produces a well-defined current response for H2O2, while the current responses for the interfering species were negligible—less than 5% of that for H2O2. This demonstrates the reliable anti-interference capability of the Cu1.8Se NS electrode. Furthermore, the reusability of the Cu1.8Se NS electrode was assessed by measuring its current response to a fixed H2O2 concentration over 18 consecutive cycles, as shown in Figure 4b. The electrode maintained 89% of its initial current response after these repeated uses, highlighting its excellent durability and stability. These results confirm the Cu1.8Se NS electrode’s potential for practical applications, showcasing its reliable anti-interference properties and robust reusability in H2O2 sensing.

3.3. SERS Performances

Figure 5a presents a comparison of Raman signals from a 0.6 mM Rhodamine B adsorbed on Cu1.8Se NS surfaces. The characteristic surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) signals of Rhodamine B on the Cu1.8Se NS are observed at vibrational modes of 614, 1187, 1320, 1365, 1511, and 1645 cm−1. These vibrations correspond to ring deformation, C-H stretching, C-H in-plane bending, and aromatic C-C stretching [21]. Notably, the SERS signals from the Cu1.8Se NS sample are significantly stronger than those from a 0.6 mM Rhodamine B solution and a 0.6 mM Rhodamine B adsorbed on Cu foil surfaces. The SERS activity can be attributed to the LSPR effect of Cu1.8Se, which arises due to its high hole concentration as a p-type semiconductor [8,9,10]. In addition, the 2D nanosheet morphology enhances surface interactions and creates hot spots that contribute to the observed SERS performance. Using Rhodamine B as a test molecule, the enhancement factor (EF) of Cu1.8Se NS as a SERS substrate was estimated based on Equation (7) [21]:
EF = (ISERS/Ibulk)(Nbulk/Nads)
where ISERS and Ibulk are the Raman signal intensities at a specific vibrational wavenumber (1645 cm−1, chosen for this study) for Rhodamine B molecules adsorbed on the substrate and in solution, respectively. The intensity ratio was determined by measuring Rhodamine B at the same concentration, with ISERS obtained on the Cu1.8Se substrate and Ibulk obtained from the same solution on a non-enhancing bare Cu foil, where no surface enhancement occurs. Nads and Nbulk represent the number of adsorbed molecules on the Cu1.8Se NS surface and the number of Rhodamine B molecules in the solution within the laser spot, respectively. Following our previous method for calculating Nbulk and Nads, the ratio Nbulk/Nads was determined to be approximately 104 for the same laser spot area [22]. Under identical Raman measurement conditions, the intensity ratio ISERS/Ibulk was calculated to be approximately 102. Consequently, the EF was estimated to be on the order of 106, which is comparable to many reports on copper-based SERS substrates (as detailed in Table 2) [23,24,25,26,27].
To further explore the SERS detection capability of the Cu1.8Se NS, Rhodamine B solutions of varying concentrations were tested. Figure 5b presents Raman spectra of Rhodamine B adsorbed on Cu1.8Se NS substrates at concentrations ranging from 1 × 10−3 M to 1 × 10−6 M. The Raman signal intensity decreases progressively as the Rhodamine B concentration is reduced, with clear detection achieved even at a concentration as low as 1 μM. This demonstrates that the novel flower-like Cu1.8Se NS substrate exhibits a lower detection limit compared to previously reported copper-based SERS substrates (as detailed in Table 2). Furthermore, the relationship between the intensity of the SERS spectra and the concentration of Rhodamine B using the Cu1.8Se NS substrate was investigated. For the four tested concentrations applied to seven experimental windows, the intensity–concentration relationship is depicted in Figure 5c. To evaluate the reproducibility of the SERS signals, measurements were performed at three randomly selected regions across three independently prepared substrates using different Rhodamine B concentrations. The intensity of the characteristic Raman peak at 1645 cm−1 was used for statistical analysis. The average SERS intensity was calculated, and the standard deviation and relative standard deviation (RSD) were determined. The resulting %RSD was 6.8%, indicating good signal reproducibility and uniformity across the substrate. A linear correlation was observed between the logarithm of Rhodamine B concentration and the intensity of the Raman mode at 1645 cm−1, as described by Equation (8):
log I = 4.86 + 0.56 × log C
where I represents the SERS signal intensity of Rhodamine B and C is the concentration of Rhodamine B. To better understand the light–matter interaction and possible electromagnetic enhancement mechanism, we have now included the UV–Vis–NIR absorption spectrum of the Cu1.8Se nanosheet film. The spectrum shows strong and broad absorption across the visible and near-infrared regions, supporting the presence of LSPR, which is attributed to the high hole concentration in Cu1.8Se. This absorption behavior is consistent with literature reports on plasmonic p-type copper chalcogenides and provides further evidence that the nanosheet structure contributes to the observed SERS enhancement through light absorption and field confinement [8,9,10].

4. Conclusions

Two-dimensional Cu1.8Se nanostructures on a Cu foil substrate were successfully synthesized through a two-step process, serving as a dual-functional sensor for H2O2 detection and a highly sensitive SERS substrate. The synthesis began with the electrochemical oxidation method to produce Cu(OH)2 nanowires (NW), followed by selenization of the Cu(OH)2 NW in an alkaline solution containing NaBH4 and Se at room temperature for 24 h, yielding the Cu1.8Se NSs. The morphology, composition, and crystal structure of the Cu1.8Se NS were characterized using SEM, XPS, and XRD, respectively. As an electrochemical electrode for H2O2 detection, the Cu1.8Se NS exhibited excellent performance, including a low detection limit of 1.25 µM, outstanding stability, and effective anti-interference capability. Additionally, as a SERS substrate, the Cu1.8Se NS demonstrated remarkable sensitivity, enabling the detection of Rhodamine B with an enhancement factor (EF) of approximately 106. In both sensing applications, the Cu1.8Se NS displayed a linear relationship between the concentration and detection signal, along with high reproducibility. This study highlights a simple and efficient route for fabricating Cu1.8Se NS structures as effective SERS substrates and promising candidates for the routine analysis of H2O2 concentration.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.-C.C. and Y.-K.H.; methodology, M.C.; validation, M.C. and Y.-C.C.; formal analysis, M.C.; investigation, M.C.; resources, Y.-C.C.; data curation, M.C.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.-C.C. and Y.-K.H.; writing—review and editing, Y.-K.H.; supervision, Y.-K.H.; project administration, Y.-C.C. and Y.-K.H.; funding acquisition, Y.-K.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

National Science Council: NSTC113-2221-E-259-017-MY3; National Dong Hwa University: MOST 111-2221-E-259-004-MY3; National Taipei University of Technology: MOST 113-2112-M-027-004.

Data Availability Statement

The data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The National Science Council, National Dong Hwa University, and National Taipei University of Technology, Taiwan, supported this research under contracts NSTC113-2221-E-259-017-MY3, MOST 111-2221-E-259-004-MY3, and MOST 113-2112-M-027-004, respectively. The authors further acknowledge the technical support from the Precision Analysis and Material Research Center, National Dong Hwa University, for the structural characterization.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Palchoudhury, S.; Ramasamy, K.; Han, J.; Chen, P.; Gupta, A. Transition metal chalcogenides for next-generation energy storage. Nanoscale Adv. 2023, 5, 2724–2742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, Y.; Tang, H.; Zhu, H.; Kakinen, A.; Wang, D.; Andrikopoulos, N.; Sun, Y.; Nandakumar, A.; Kwak, E.; Davis, T.P.; et al. Ultrasmall Molybdenum Disulfide Quantum Dots Cage Alzheimer’s Amyloid Beta to Restore Membrane Fluidity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 29936–29948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Xiao, Y.; Zhao, L.D. Charge and phonon transport in PbTe-based thermoelectric materials. npj Quantum Mater. 2018, 3, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhu, K.; Wei, S.; Zhou, Q.; Chen, S.; Lin, Y.; Zhang, P.; Cao, Y.; Wang, C.; Wang, Y.; Xia, Y.; et al. Interface regulation of Cu2Se via Cu-Se-C bonding for superior lithium-ion batteries. Nano Res. 2023, 16, 2421–2427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Malavekar, D.B.; Kale, S.B.; Lokhande, V.C.; Patil, U.M.; Kim, J.H.; Lokhande, C.D. Chemically Synthesized Cu3Se2 Film Based Flexible Solid-State Symmetric Supercapacitor: Effect of Reaction Bath Temperature. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 14, 28395–28406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lv, X.W.; Kong, Q.H.; Song, X.L.; Liu, Y.P.; Yuan, Z.Y. Coupling nonstoichiometric Cu2−xSe with stable Cu2Se berzelianite for efficient synergistic electrocatalytic hydrazine-assisted water splitting. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2022, 9, 6182–6189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Umapathi, S.; Singh, H.; Masud, J.; Nath, M. Nanostructured copper selenide as an ultrasensitive and selective non-enzymatic glucose sensor. Mater. Adv. 2021, 2, 927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yan, G.; Ni, H.; Li, X.; Qi, X.; Yang, X.; Zou, H. Plasmonic Cu2−xSe Mediated Colorimetric/Photothermal Dual-Readout Detection of Glutathione. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 1787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lauren, E.M.; Xing, Y.G.; Derrick, C.K.; Jill, E.M. Correlating carrier density and emergent plasmonic features in Cu2−xSe nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 2017, 4, 2414–2419. [Google Scholar]
  10. Han, K.D.; Hui, Y.X.; Bonnie, A.P.; Luis, F.G.; Haley, P.M.; Boxi, C.L.; Hai, Y.W.; Katherine, E.P. Effects of I2 on Cu2−xSe Nanoparticles: Enabling cation exchange but complicating plasmonics. ACS Mater. Lett. 2020, 2, 140–146. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhu, L.; Zhao, Y.; Zheng, W.; Ba, N.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, J.; Li, X.; Xie, H.; Bie, L. One-step room temperature rapid synthesis of Cu2Se nanostructures, phase transformation, and formation of p-Cu2Se/p-Cu3Se2 heterojunctions. CrystEngComm 2016, 18, 5202–5208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, Y.C.; Yang, Z.L.; Hsu, Y.K. Unassisted Solar Water Splitting by Dual Cu2O–based Tandem Device with Complementary Wavelength–dependent Quantum Efficiency and Antipodal Conductivity. Renew. Energy 2023, 212, 166–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xie, S.; Lv, C.; Kong, L.; Li, C.; Wang, C.; Lv, X.; Wu, Q.; Feng, J.; Wang, A.J.; Chen, D.L.; et al. Potential-driven in situ formation of Se-vacancy-rich CuS@Cu2Se to steer the CO2 electroreduction path from HCOOH to C2H5OH. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2024, 11, 8272–8284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hsu, Y.K.; Chen, Y.C.; Lin, Y.G. Spontaneous Formation of CuO Nanosheets on Cu Foil for H2O2 Detection. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 354, 85–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, M.; Liu, R.; Chen, W. Graphene wrapped Cu2O nanocubes: Non-enzymatic electrochemical sensors for the detection of glucose and hydrogen peroxide with enhanced stability. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 45, 206–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Daemi, S.; Ghasemi, S.; Ashkarran, A.A. Electrospun CuO-ZnO nanohybrid: Tuning the nanostructure for improved amperometric detection of hydrogen peroxide as a non-enzymatic sensor. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 550, 180–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yang, K.; Zhong, H.; Cheng, Z.P.; Li, X.R.; Zhang, A.R.; Zhang, Y.J.; Qian, H.Y. Magnetic Fe3O4 stacked sphere-like nanocomposite and its application as platform for H2O2 sensing. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2018, 814, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Huang, J.; Zhu, Y.; Zhong, H.; Yang, X.; Li, C. Dispersed CuO nanoparticles on a silicon nanowire for improved performance of nonenzymatic H2O2 detection. ACS Appl. Mater. Interf. 2014, 6, 7055–7062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gu, A.; Wang, G.; Zhang, X.; Fang, B. Synthesis of CuO nanoflower and its application as a H2O2 sensor. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2010, 33, 17–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cheng, D.; Wang, T.; Zhang, G.; Wu, H.; Mei, H. A novel nonenzymatic electrochemical sensor based on double-shelled CuCo2O4 hollow microspheres for glucose and H2O2. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 819, 153014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Phuong, N.T.T.; Hoang, T.X.; Tran, N.L.N.; Phuc, L.G.; Phung, V.D.; Ta, H.K.T.; Bach, T.N.; Tran, N.H.T.; Trinh, K.T.L. Rapid and sensitive detection of Rhodamine B in food using the plasmonic silver nanocube-based sensor as SERS active substrate. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2021, 263, 120179. [Google Scholar]
  22. Chen, Y.C.; Bai, Y.M.; Hsu, Y.K. Biomarker Detection for Disease Diagnosis via Versatile Ag2S Nanowires as Electrochemical Sensor and SERS Substrate. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 881, 160647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Moreno, V.; Murtada, K.; Zougagh, M.; Rios, A. Analytical control of Rhodamine B by SERS using reduced graphene decorated with copper selenide. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2019, 223, 117302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dizajghorbani-Aghdam, H.; Miller, T.S.; Malekfar, R.; McMillan, P.F. SERS-active Cu nanoparticles on carbon nitride support fabricated using pulsed laser ablation. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sakir, M.; Yilmaz, E.; Onses, M.S. SERS-active hydrophobic substrates fabricated by surface growth of Cu nanostructures. Microchem. J. 2020, 154, 104628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lopez-Lorente, A.I.; Simonet, B.M.; Valcárcel, M.; Mizaikoff, B. Bare gold nanoparticles mediated surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopic determination and quantification of carboxylated single-walled carbon nanotubes. Anal. Chim. Acta 2013, 788, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bozo, E.; Dombovari, A.; Mohl, M.; Virtanen, V.K.; Saarakkala, S.; Vajtai, R.; Kordas, K. Cu-Pd bimetal and CuPt alloy nanotubes derived from cu nanowires: Novel amplification media for surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. IEEE Sens. J. 2019, 20, 143–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Schematic diagram of two-step process of synthesizing Cu1.8Se NSs.
Scheme 1. Schematic diagram of two-step process of synthesizing Cu1.8Se NSs.
Nanomaterials 15 00998 sch001
Figure 1. FESEM images of (a) Cu(OH)2 NWs and samples with selenization times of (b) 1 h, (c) 2 h (d) 4 h (e) 6 h, (f) 12 h, and (g) 24 h. (h) Low-magnification SEM of 24 h sample. (i) EDS of samples selenized for 24 h.
Figure 1. FESEM images of (a) Cu(OH)2 NWs and samples with selenization times of (b) 1 h, (c) 2 h (d) 4 h (e) 6 h, (f) 12 h, and (g) 24 h. (h) Low-magnification SEM of 24 h sample. (i) EDS of samples selenized for 24 h.
Nanomaterials 15 00998 g001
Figure 2. (a) X-ray diffraction pattern; (b) Raman spectra; (c) Cu 2p; and (d) Se 3d XPS of the Cu1.8Se NS sample.
Figure 2. (a) X-ray diffraction pattern; (b) Raman spectra; (c) Cu 2p; and (d) Se 3d XPS of the Cu1.8Se NS sample.
Nanomaterials 15 00998 g002
Figure 3. CV curves of the Cu1.8Se NS sample in the electrolyte (a) with and without varied concentrations of H2O2 and (b) sensing mechanism of Cu1.8Se. (c) Amperometric response at −0.2 V with increasing H2O2 concentration per 50 s for the Cu1.8Se NS samples; (d) relation between the amperometric response and H2O2 concentration.
Figure 3. CV curves of the Cu1.8Se NS sample in the electrolyte (a) with and without varied concentrations of H2O2 and (b) sensing mechanism of Cu1.8Se. (c) Amperometric response at −0.2 V with increasing H2O2 concentration per 50 s for the Cu1.8Se NS samples; (d) relation between the amperometric response and H2O2 concentration.
Nanomaterials 15 00998 g003
Figure 4. (a) Flow injection amperometric response to injections of interferences of fructose, ascorbic acid, uric acid, and glucose. (b) Stability test of Cu1.8Se NS samples.
Figure 4. (a) Flow injection amperometric response to injections of interferences of fructose, ascorbic acid, uric acid, and glucose. (b) Stability test of Cu1.8Se NS samples.
Nanomaterials 15 00998 g004
Figure 5. (a) Raman spectra of Rhodamine B adsorbed on the Cu1.8Se NS samples and comparison of Raman signal with a 0.6 mM Rhodamine B solution and Rhodamine B adsorbed on the Cu foil. (b) Raman spectra of Rhodamine B with varied concentration adsorbed on the Cu1.8Se NSs; (c) linear relation between the logarithmic intensity at 1645 cm−1 and concentration of Rhodamine B. (d) Optical absorption spectrum of the Cu1.8Se NS samples.
Figure 5. (a) Raman spectra of Rhodamine B adsorbed on the Cu1.8Se NS samples and comparison of Raman signal with a 0.6 mM Rhodamine B solution and Rhodamine B adsorbed on the Cu foil. (b) Raman spectra of Rhodamine B with varied concentration adsorbed on the Cu1.8Se NSs; (c) linear relation between the logarithmic intensity at 1645 cm−1 and concentration of Rhodamine B. (d) Optical absorption spectrum of the Cu1.8Se NS samples.
Nanomaterials 15 00998 g005
Table 1. Comparison with the literature regarding the performance of electrochemical H2O2 sensing.
Table 1. Comparison with the literature regarding the performance of electrochemical H2O2 sensing.
Sensor TypeDetection Limit
(μM)
Linear Range
(mM)
Sensitivity
(μAmM−1cm−2)
Ref.
Cu2O/GN20.80.3–7.8 [15]
ZnO3−CuO7/CPE2.40.003−0.531.11[16]
CuO-SiNWs/GCE1.60.01–13.1822.27[17]
Fe3O4/GCE s20.005−4.9205[18]
CuO nanoflowers50.05-4.600116.1[19]
CuCo2O43.00.01–8.9094.1[20]
Cu1.8Se NS1.250.00125–9.73751335This work
Table 2. Comparison with the literature regarding the SERS performance.
Table 2. Comparison with the literature regarding the SERS performance.
SERS SubstrateDetection Limit (M)EFRef.
CuSe-rGO10−762.5[23]
Cu/gCN10−94.1 × 103[24]
Cu NSs 1.3 × 107[25]
AuNPs2 × 10−838.9[26]
CuPt alloy nanotubes10−6 [27]
Cu1.8Se NS10−6106This work
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, Y.-C.; Chen, M.; Hsu, Y.-K. High-Performance Cu1.8Se Nanosheets for Dual-Sensing: H2O2 Electrochemical Detection and SERS Substrate. Nanomaterials 2025, 15, 998. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15130998

AMA Style

Chen Y-C, Chen M, Hsu Y-K. High-Performance Cu1.8Se Nanosheets for Dual-Sensing: H2O2 Electrochemical Detection and SERS Substrate. Nanomaterials. 2025; 15(13):998. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15130998

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Ying-Chu, Michael Chen, and Yu-Kuei Hsu. 2025. "High-Performance Cu1.8Se Nanosheets for Dual-Sensing: H2O2 Electrochemical Detection and SERS Substrate" Nanomaterials 15, no. 13: 998. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15130998

APA Style

Chen, Y.-C., Chen, M., & Hsu, Y.-K. (2025). High-Performance Cu1.8Se Nanosheets for Dual-Sensing: H2O2 Electrochemical Detection and SERS Substrate. Nanomaterials, 15(13), 998. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15130998

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop