Next Article in Journal
Low-Temperature Hydrotreatment of C4/C5 Fractions Using a Dual-Metal-Loaded Composite Oxide Catalyst
Previous Article in Journal
Angle-Controlled Nanospectrum Switching from Lorentzian to Fano Lineshapes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Application of Biochar-Based Materials for Effective Pollutant Removal in Wastewater Treatment

1
College of Civil Engineering, Sichuan Agricultural University, Dujiangyan 611830, China
2
Luoyang Petrochemical Engineering Design Co., Ltd., Luoyang 471003, China
3
Chengdu Tiantou Industry Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Nanomaterials 2024, 14(23), 1933; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14231933
Submission received: 23 October 2024 / Revised: 23 November 2024 / Accepted: 28 November 2024 / Published: 30 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Nanomaterials in Catalysis for Pollution Control)

Abstract

:
With the growth of the global population and the acceleration of industrialization, the problem of water pollution has become increasingly serious, posing a major threat to the ecosystem and human health. Traditional water treatment technologies make it difficult to cope with complex pollution, so the scientific community is actively exploring new and efficient treatment methods. Biochar (BC), as a low-cost, green carbon-based material, exhibits good adsorption and catalytic properties in water treatment due to its porous structure and abundant active functional groups. However, BC’s pure adsorption or catalytic capacity is limited, and researchers have dramatically enhanced its performance through modification means, such as loading metals or heteroatoms. In this paper, we systematically review the recent applications of BC and its modified materials for water treatment in adsorption, Fenton-like, electrocatalytic, photocatalytic, and sonocatalytic systems, and discuss their adsorption/catalytic mechanisms. However, most of the research in this field is at the laboratory simulation stage and still needs much improvement before it can be applied in large-scale wastewater treatment. This review improves the understanding of the pollutant adsorption/catalytic properties and mechanisms of BC-based materials, analyzes the limitations of the current studies, and investigates future directions.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Water pollution is a critical global issue, threatening ecosystems and human health [1]. Rapid population growth, industrialization, and urbanization have led to significant pollutant discharges from industrial, agricultural, and urban sources. These pollutants often contain high levels of nitrogen and phosphorus, causing eutrophication, heavy metals like lead and mercury, and organic contaminants such as pesticides and drug residues. This contamination threatens drinking water safety and sustainable water use [2,3]. Conventional water treatment methods are increasingly inadequate, prompting researchers to develop more efficient and environmentally friendly solutions.
Biochar (BC) is a carbon-based material produced through the pyrolysis of biomass, which includes agricultural residues (like straw and branches), municipal sludge, food waste, and other organic materials. These feedstocks are cost-effective and contribute to the reduction of environmental pollution [4]. Common production methods include pyrolysis, hydrothermal treatment, and gasification [5,6,7]. The physicochemical properties of BC vary based on the precursor material and preparation conditions [8]. The most commonly reported physical properties include structure, porosity, pore size distribution, total pore, specific surface area, and adsorption capacity [9,10]. Meanwhile, its chemical properties are typically characterized by moisture content, ash, volatile matter, fixed carbon, carbon content, functional groups, aromaticity, and degree of carbonization [9,11]. The unique physicochemical properties of BC enable its effective use in various applications. In agriculture, BC serves as a slow-release fertilizer that improves soil quality and promotes crop growth [12,13]. In environmental applications, it is employed to control pollutant migration and reduce soil and water contamination [14,15]. In water treatment, BC demonstrates excellent adsorption and catalytic properties due to its large surface area, porous structure, and surface-active functional groups [16,17]. Its ability to remove pollutants stems from its porous design and the presence of oxygen-containing groups (e.g., carboxyl, hydroxyl, carbonyl) that enhance chemical adsorption. However, its performance can be limited to complex pollutants. Researchers have addressed this by modifying BC to improve its pore structure, increase surface area, and enhance activity through the addition of metals and heteroatoms [18,19].
Compared to traditional adsorption processes, advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) are increasingly recognized for their ability to mineralize resistant organic pollutants into harmless by-products like water and carbon dioxide [20]. These processes generate highly reactive species, such as sulfate (SO4•−) and hydroxyl radicals (HO), which effectively degrade pollutants. However, reliance on metal catalysts can lead to leaching and by-product formation, posing environmental risks [17,21]. Therefore, eco-friendly alternatives like BC have gained traction, as they prevent metal leaching and demonstrate excellent catalytic properties [22]. Studies show that persistent free radicals (PFRs) and oxygenated functional groups (OFGs) in BC activate oxidants, enhancing pollutant degradation [23,24]. Yet, pure BC’s catalytic capacity is limited, prompting modifications through techniques like ball milling and the addition of metals to improve performance [25,26,27]. Modified BC excels in water treatment and is also effective in air pollution control and soil remediation [14].
The pollutant removal performance of BC-based materials depends on their physicochemical properties, the type of pollutant, and treatment conditions. The physicochemical properties of the BC can be modified through activation (acid-base), ball milling, or the addition of metals and heteroatoms [7,25,26,28]. Among the treatment conditions, the amount of BC used is a key factor affecting pollutant removal. More BC catalysts provide additional active sites, enhancing adsorption and promoting the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which improves pollutant degradation efficiency [29,30,31]. However, excessive amounts of BC catalysts may lead to the self-quenching of free radicals [32]. Elevated temperatures enhance pollutant adsorption and help reactant molecules overcome activation energy barriers, facilitating ROS formation [33,34]. However, high temperatures may be uneconomical, so selecting the optimal temperature is crucial. The effect of solution pH on pollutant removal depends on the properties of the substances involved in different degradation systems and the characteristics of the pollutant [35,36]. Additionally, the adsorption of pollutants can be hindered by competing anions (e.g., NO3, SO42–, PO43⁻), which may affect the catalytic process [37,38,39]. To tackle growing wastewater treatment challenges, there is a global push for sustainable materials. BC, a low-cost carbon-based option, has gained attention, though an efficient industrial-scale application is still lacking. This paper reviews recent advancements in BC for water treatment, highlighting its precursor characteristics and their impact on BC’s structure and performance. It discusses BC applications across various treatment technologies, including adsorption systems, Fenton-like systems, electrocatalytic systems, photocatalytic systems, and sonocatalytic systems. The review explores the adsorption and catalytic mechanisms of different BC types and identifies research gaps and future directions, aiming to support the development and wider application of BC in wastewater treatment.

2. Production and Structural Characteristics of Biochar

2.1. Composition of Biochar

2.1.1. Carbon Sources of Biochar

BC can be derived from various carbon sources, typically categorized into lignocellulosic and non-lignocellulosic biomass. Lignocellulosic biomass, primarily sourced from plants, includes materials rich in cellulose, such as wood, leaf litter, fruit hulls, and straw. This biomass consists of cellulose (25–50 wt%), hemicellulose (15–40 wt%), and lignin (10–40 wt%), along with minor components like structural proteins, lipids, and ash. Non-lignocellulosic biomass encompasses a broader range of materials, including animal and microbial sources, as well as certain plant derivatives [40,41]. Minakshi et al. studied industrial hemp from Western Australia, which consists of two parts: the hemp wood core (65%) and the hemp blast (35%). The wood core contains 40–48% cellulose, 18–24% hemicellulose, and 21–23% lignin, while the embryo contains 57–77% cellulose and 9–14% hemicellulose, which were consistent with the compositional properties of lignocellulosic biomass [42]. Examples of non-lignocellulosic biomass include municipal sludge, food waste, livestock manure, algae, and yeast residues. Figure 1a illustrates the common types of both lignocellulosic and non-lignocellulosic biomass.

2.1.2. Elemental Composition of Biomass

Elemental composition is a key characteristic of carbon materials. Figure 1b–f shows the composition of various biomass types, including grasses (switchgrass, miscanthus, clover), peels and shells (olive husk, almond hulls, coconut husk), straws (corn stover, winter rape straw, rye straw), woods (beech, oak, cherry), leaf litter (olive, maple, palm leaves), sludge (from onion oil and sewage), and manure (from cows, sheep, and horses). These biomass types primarily consist of carbon (C) and oxygen (O), with varying amounts of nitrogen (N) and sulfur (S). The higher carbon content in lignocellulosic biomass is due to its significant cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin (Figure 1b–e), while hemicellulose tends to decompose completely at elevated temperatures (∼900 °C) due to its low degree of polymerization. Some lignin precursors are rich in specific heteroatoms. For example, Minakshi et al. found that honeydew melon contains high levels of potassium, chloride, and phosphorus. During chemical activation, water-soluble KCl salts may react with HDP under heat-treatment conditions, releasing chloride as a gas and causing potassium to melt into the solid carbon, resulting in the formation of porous graphitic carbon [43]. In contrast, non-lignocellulosic biomass typically contains higher levels of miscellaneous elements such as N, P, S, and metals (Figure 1f). This is likely due to its higher protein and lipid content [40], which incorporates these elements into the structural units. Consequently, non-lignocellulosic biomass, rich in nitrogen, sulfur, and phosphorus, is often utilized to enhance soil quality [12]. As shown in Figure 1d, non-lignocellulosic biomass also tends to have higher ash content, attributed to the presence of elements like P, Ca, K, Mg, Fe, Si, and Na.

2.2. Production of Biochar

2.2.1. Pretreatment of Precursors

Before converting biomass into biochar, simple pretreatment methods can increase BC yield, optimize its characteristics, and remove impurities [44]. The primary pretreatment methods include physical pretreatment (e.g., ball milling, heat treatment) [45,46], chemical pretreatment (e.g., oxidation, acid and alkali solution soaking) [47,48,49,50], and biological pretreatment (e.g., enzymatic degradation, anaerobic digestion) [51,52]. For instance, in the study by Wang et al., a multistage gradient structure of N, S co-doped carbon was prepared by soaking the precursor in KOH, resulting in BC with abundant mesopores and a high specific surface area [47]. Yang et al. employed anaerobic digestion of biomass, which created favorable conditions for nitrogen incorporation. The BC produced from the anaerobically digested biomass exhibited superior physicochemical properties compared to BC derived from virgin biomass, including higher specific surface area, nitrogen content, and degree of graphitization [51].

2.2.2. Activation of Biochar

BC activation can enhance its physical structure, introduce functional groups, and create conditions suitable for material loading [53]. Common activation methods include physical activation (e.g., ball milling, heat treatment) [7,54,55,56], chemical activation (e.g., acid activation, alkali activation, metal oxide activation) [57,58], and physicochemical co-activation [59,60]. For example, Xu et al. applied KOH and KMnO4 to co-activate wheat straw BC, which resulted in BC with a higher specific surface area and a richer pore structure [58].

2.2.3. Synthesis Methods of Biochar

BC can be prepared using various methods, with pyrolysis (including fast pyrolysis and slow pyrolysis) being the most common. Other preparation methods include gasification, hydrothermal carbonization, microwave pyrolysis, flash carbonization, and baking [61]. However, the chars obtained from gasification and hydrothermal carbonization typically do not meet the definition of BC [62]. This section summarizes a few common preparation methods and the conditions under which they are carried out as shown in Table 1.

2.3. Structural Characteristics of Biochar

BC is produced from biomass via pyrolysis and carbonization, resulting in a carbon-rich microporous material with high aromaticity. Its structural properties depend on pyrolysis temperature, mode, and precursor characteristics [74]. Higher pyrolysis temperatures increase BC porosity, enhancing its adsorption capacity [75,76]. Ouyang et al. found that elevated temperatures can lead to the collapse of the carbon skeleton and increased activation capacity for peroxymonosulfate (PMS) [77]. However, repeated experiments may oxidize the framework and defect edges, increasing oxygen-containing functional groups, which reduces its electron transfer efficiency to PMS. While the aromatic structure and nanopore size generally increase with carbonization temperature, temperatures above 700 °C can damage microporous structures, and above 800 °C, the carbon skeleton may become unstable [78,79]. The structure of BC also varies based on the biomass source and cellulose and lignin content [80]. Abundant hydroxyl groups in cellulose and hemicellulose contribute to micropore formation, resulting in a three-dimensional structure [81]. This extensive pore structure and stability make lignocellulosic BC effective for metal loading and suitable for complex water treatment systems [26].

3. Application of Biochar in the Degradation of Wastewater Pollutants

3.1. Application of Biochar in Adsorption System

The adsorption process is a key method for wastewater treatment [82]. While activated carbon is widely used due to its large surface area and thermal stability [83], its high cost and regeneration difficulties have led to a search for more economical alternatives [84]. BC, derived from agricultural waste and municipal sludge, offers low cost, easy modification, and substantial microporosity, exemplifying “waste for waste” in pollutant adsorption [85]. Table 2 summarizes BC’s application for degrading pollutants in the adsorption system.

3.1.1. Native Biochar Adsorbents

BC is considered a sustainable substitute for activated carbon, effectively removing various pollutants from wastewater [96]. Researchers have explored different surface modification methods to enhance BC’s adsorption capacity. For instance, Jiang et al. activated BC derived from cow dung using varying concentrations of H3PO4, achieving an enrofloxacin adsorption capacity of 63.61 mg/g, six times higher than that of unmodified BC (12.66 mg/g) [86]. This phosphoric acid treatment enriched the BC’s pores and increased its specific surface area, significantly improving its adsorption performance. The modified BC exhibited numerous functional groups, such as hydroxyl, carboxyl, and carbonyl groups, which facilitated hydrogen bonding with enrofloxacin through π–π interactions, enhancing the hydrophobic effect (Figure 2). Alkali modification is another effective approach for boosting BC’s adsorption capabilities. Xu et al. combined KOH and KMnO4 to increase the maximum tetracycline (TC) adsorption capacity to 584.19 mg/g [58]. The KMnO4 modification promoted mesopore formation, while KOH enhanced micropore generation, significantly improving the physical and chemical properties of the BC. After modification, the ID/IG ratio decreased from 2.58 to 2.32, indicating enhanced π–π interactions and charge transfer during TC adsorption.
Physical modifications, such as ball milling, are also popular due to their environmentally friendly nature. This method, known for its simplicity and efficiency, reduces solid materials to the nanometer scale, increasing specific surface area and creating new interfaces [97]. Zhang et al. tested ball-milled BC from various biomass sources and found that ball milling significantly improved the physicochemical properties and adsorption capacity of galaxolide [55]. Although the increase in oxygen-containing functional groups slightly decreased hydrophobicity, the overall gain in adsorption capacity outweighed this loss. Harindintwali et al. reported that ball milling enhanced BC’s adsorption efficiency for both organic and inorganic pollutants by increasing specific surface area, pore volume, and acidic oxygen functional groups, as well as improving negative zeta potential. This process enhances adsorption through surface complexation, electrostatic attraction, pore filling, and π–π interactions [98].

3.1.2. Metal-Doped Biochar Adsorbents

Recently, metal compounds/BC composites have gained popularity in adsorption technology. The addition of metal dopants can significantly enhance the adsorption capacity of BC [99]. Zhuo et al. modified corn stover-derived BC with calcium chloride, resulting in a nearly twofold increase in its tetracycline adsorption capacity [87]. Similarly, Luo et al. created bismuth oxychloride/BC (BiOCl/BC) nanocomposites via ball milling, which exhibited excellent adsorption performance for both water and reactive red-120 (RR120), with a maximum capacity of 116.382 mg/g [89]. Characterization showed that BiOCl/BC was rich in oxygen vacancies, providing abundant adsorption sites. Electrostatic and π–π interactions also significantly contributed to the adsorption process (Figure 3). The high adsorption rate under acidic conditions, contrasted with a lower rate in alkaline conditions, highlighted the importance of electrostatic attraction between the sulfonic acid group of RR120 and the BiOCl/BC surface. Thus, the combination of high specific surface area, abundant oxygen vacancies, and multiple interactions accounts for the superior adsorption capacity of BiOCl/BC.
Magnetic adsorbents not only offer recyclability but also demonstrate improved pollutant removal compared to conventional BC. Metals such as cobalt, nickel, and iron can be incorporated into carbon-based materials through methods like microwave synthesis, co-precipitation, and hydrothermal processes [100,101]. For example, Zhang et al. developed magnetized BC (MF-CMS) with a spherical structure and a specific surface area of 747.76 m2/g, achieving a 96.02% removal rate for tetracycline [91]. Additionally, Li et al. created a novel surface-imprinted polymer (MIP-MBC) for targeted adsorption of sulfamethoxazole (SMX) using Fe-Mn modified BC, which reached a maximum adsorption capacity of 25.65 mg/g—1.34 times higher than that of the non-imprinted magnetic BC [92]. The mesoporous structure and oxygen-containing functional groups significantly enhanced the adsorption efficiency of SMX.

3.1.3. Heteroatom-Doped Biochar Adsorbents

In addition to acid and alkali modifications, as well as metal oxide/BC composites [60], heteroatom doping significantly enhances BC’s adsorption capacity. Nitrogen doping improves graphitization, increases oxygen- and nitrogen-containing functional groups, and enhances hydrophilicity, boosting adsorption efficiency [102]. However, excessive nitrogen doping can reduce adsorption capacity by increasing surface nitrogen content and the ID/IG ratio while decreasing surface oxygen content, which is critical for certain pollutants [95]. BC adsorbs pollutants via π–π interactions and weak electrostatic forces due to its rich surface functional groups. Nitrogen doping and defects enhance this capacity [16]. The ball milling method for nitrogen-doped BC is gaining attention for its simplicity and low energy use. Wu et al. created urea N-doped BC with an adsorption capacity of 11.48 mg/g for norfloxacin at pH ≈ 5, significantly higher than the 2.83 mg/g of unmodified BC [93]. This improvement was effective across a pH range of 3–9, driven by enhanced hydrogen bonding, π–π interactions, and pore filling. Ma et al. developed an optimally hydrothermal N-doped sludge BC using melamine, resulting in BNSBC-0.5 [7]. Analyses showed that BNSBC-0.5 adsorbs sulfamethoxazole (SMX) mainly through Lewis acid-base interactions, π–π conjugation, pore filling, and electrostatic interactions, achieving over 88% removal efficiency from various water sources.

3.2. Application of Biochar-Based Catalysts in Fenton-like Systems

The adsorption process transfers contaminants without eliminating them, leading to BC saturation that requires periodic replacement, thus increasing treatment costs. In contrast, Fenton-like systems generate free radicals that mineralize contaminants into harmless water and carbon dioxide, making them effective for complex pollutants resistant to adsorption [103]. BC’s abundant functional groups and vacancies activate oxidants to produce free radicals, while its pore structure supports metal loading and complex catalysis. Table 3 summarizes BC’s application for degrading pollutants in Fenton-like systems.

3.2.1. Native Biochar-Based Catalysts in Fenton-like Systems

BC contains PFRs and OFGs that activate persulfate (PS) and H2O2 to generate HO [125]. Fang et al. showed that BC from pine needles, wheat, and corn stover activated H2O2 to degrade dichlorobiphenyl, with PFRs identified as key contributors to HO formation [126]. Li et al. created a novel BC catalyst, SB-BC-900, from co-pyrolyzed sewage sludge and bagasse, which effectively activated peroxomonosulfate (PMS) for bisphenol AF (BPAF) degradation [106]. XRD showed decreased graphitization of SB-BC-900 post-reaction, while FTIR and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analyses indicated reduced C=O and C=C peaks, highlighting the influence of sp2 carbon and OFGs (Figure 4).
Structural defects also impact catalytic efficiency. Research shows that BC prepared at high temperatures exhibits varying catalytic capacities based on its defective structures (e.g., edge defects, curvature defects, and vacancies) [77,105,127]. For instance, Zhang et al. found that although environmentally persistent free radicals (EPFRs) diminished at elevated temperatures (800–900 °C), BC’s activation capacity remained high due to the presence of these defects [104]. XPS analysis of pine BC revealed changes in C-C, C-C/C-H, and C-O bond ratios before and after reactions, underscoring the importance of defective structures in reactions. The proportion of C-C bonds decreased from 71.75% to 67.40%, while C-C/C-H bonds increased from 11.73% to 19.89%. Research shows that higher preparation temperatures correlate with more defects and enhanced activation capacity, making the optimization of defect structures a key focus for improving BC’s catalytic performance [128].

3.2.2. Metal-Based Biochar Catalysts in Fenton-like Systems

Monometallic-Based Biochar Catalysts

Iron’s catalytic, magnetic, and reducing properties make BC-Fe composites effective by combining BC with iron [129]. Nano-zero-valent iron (nZVI) has been widely studied as a substitute for Fe2+ in Fenton systems [130,131]. However, nZVI tends to aggregate into microparticles due to magnetic interactions and high surface energy, limiting its catalytic efficiency. BC can stabilize nZVI, enhancing its performance due to its porous structure. Zhu et al. combined nZVI with nickel to create composites that degrade pollutants like norfloxacin by promoting Fe ion cycling [132]. Metal aggregation can be effectively inhibited by ball-milling transition metals with BC. He et al. prepared FeS@BC by ball milling, which successfully inhibited the aggregation of FeS and facilitated the electron transfer between PS, the electron donor, and the pollutant, which led to the non-radical degradation of the pollutant [122].
Copper oxide (CuO) has also been widely studied as a transition metal oxide catalyst in the activation of PDS. Li et al. developed RSBC-CuO composites through hydrothermal methods, which degraded finasteride (PNT) over a wide pH range (4.26~10), mainly relying on Cu3+ activation and PDS-driven HO and SO4•− radical generation [111]. Similarly, Zhao et al. created e-CuO@BC catalysts, which selectively degraded electron-rich pollutants via Cu-O-C bonding and enhanced PDS activation [133]. BC-CuO/PMS systems also proved effective in treating high-salt wastewater [134].
Cobalt (Co) is highly effective in activating PS [135,136,137], though cobalt leaching poses potential health risks. BC’s carbon-rich structure provides an ideal cobalt carrier, offering excellent electrical conductivity, stability, low cost, and environmental friendliness [138,139,140]. Song et al. developed a Co3O4-loaded BC (Bio-Co3O4) from peanut shells, which effectively catalyzed PMS-driven antibiotic degradation in wastewater. The BC prevented Co3O4 agglomeration, increased active sites, and improved stability over multiple uses [116]. Additionally, the metal introduction enhanced pore size and surface area, aiding metal loading and minimizing leaching risk [140,141]. The release of cobalt ions from BC-Co3O4 was below 0.1 mg·L−1, far below the WHO drinking water standard of 10 μg/L.

Multimetal-Based Biochar Catalysts

Bimetallic and polymetallic catalysts often perform better than monometallic ones [142]. Various bimetallic compounds are commonly used [26,77,143,144,145]. In spinel-based BC catalysts, doped metals not only provide catalytic activity but also create defective structures that enhance performance. Wang et al. discovered that oxygen defects and C=O groups on doped bimetallic oxides significantly boost their catalytic abilities [146]. Li et al. explored metal doping further, preparing a CoFe2O4-loaded BC composite (CFB-2) to degrade tetracycline hydrochloride (TCH) by activating peroxyacetic acid [121]. When K2Cr2O7, an electron scavenger, was added, the TCH removal was almost completely inhibited, suggesting that C=O groups act as Lewis bases, facilitating electron transfer and redox reactions that generate singlet oxygen (1O2). Cyclic voltammetry revealed larger current peaks on CFB-2 compared to BC alone, indicating improved electron transfer and ROS generation.

3.2.3. Heteroatom-Doped Biochar Catalysts in Fenton-like Systems

Metal leaching is a drawback of metal catalysts, so metal-free, carbon-based materials are being developed for PMS activation. Heteroatom doping (e.g., nitrogen, sulfur) has been shown to significantly improve PMS activation efficiency [147]. However, carbon materials are often inert, limiting their catalytic performance. Ye et al. found that nitrogen-doped, graphitized BC catalysts effectively degrade pollutants through a non-radical pathway, which is less affected by complex wastewater compositions [123]. Fan et al. used Ginkgo biloba leaves to prepare BC that efficiently activated PMS for phenol degradation [28]. The results showed that PMS adsorption was facilitated by oxygen, sulfur, and nitrogen groups on the BC. Sulfur functional groups increase the number of positively charged carbon atoms, promoting O-O bond cleavage and radical generation during PMS activation. Additionally, PMS forms adducts with C-O groups, which then produce 1O2 for the non-radical degradation of phenol (Figure 5).

3.3. Application of Biochar-Based Catalysts in Photocatalytic Systems

Under sunlight, the BC carbon matrix (BCM) and the dissolved organic matter (DOM) it releases promote the production of HO and 1O2 through light-induced energy and electron transfer [100]. BC also enhances light absorption [148], reduces electron-hole pair recombination [149], and increases catalyst surface area, making it an effective photocatalyst carrier. Recent advances in BC-based photocatalysis are significant, as summarized in Table 4.

3.3.1. Native Biochar-Based Catalysts in Photocatalytic Systems

Fang et al. studied the photochemical activity of BC and the role of PFRs in HO production [162]. They found that DOM-rich BC enhanced 1O2 formation, while BC with abundant surface PFRs increased HO generation under light. By comparing BC from different sources (e.g., pine needles, and wheat straw), they concluded that PFRs contributed to over 60% of HO production, highlighting PFRs as key factors in photocatalytic systems. Wan et al. examined reactive species generated by straw BC-derived dissolved black carbon (DBC) during photocatalysis [163]. Through transient absorption spectra of rice DBC under 355 nm laser irradiation, an absorption band around 440 nm was attributed to the production of the DBC triplet state (3DBC*). The high quantum yield and electron transfer capacity of 3DBC* accelerated pollutant degradation in DBC-rich water. Electron spin resonance experiments confirmed the presence of both HO and 1O2.

3.3.2. Semiconductor-Doped Biochar-Based Catalysts in Photocatalytic Systems

TiO2/Biochar-Based Catalysts

TiO2 is one of the first photocatalytic materials extensively studied [164]. However, its large band gap (Eg = 3.2 eV) limits excitation to UV or near-UV radiation [165], and the rapid recombination of photogenerated electrons and holes significantly reduces photocatalytic efficiency [166]. Carbonaceous nanomaterials can serve as electron carriers and transport channels, enhancing photocatalytic performance [167]. Lu et al. synthesized TiO2/BC composite catalysts by hydrolyzing TiO2 deposited on BC [151]. Under UV irradiation, the composite catalyst achieved a decolorization efficiency of 96.88%, outperforming the TiO2 catalyst alone (76.69%). Quenching experiments indicated that holes, HO, and superoxide anions (O2•−) were involved in decolorization, with HO being the most significant contributor. Under UV light, TiO2 generates electrons and holes, while BC transfers electrons to minimize recombination. The electrons then react with oxygen molecules to produce O2•−, which generates HO. Additionally, water reacts with holes to form HO. Ultimately, these reactive species degrade methyl orange (MO) into CO2 and water (Figure 6). Recently, ball milling has been increasingly applied in photocatalysis. Mancuso et al. prepared TiO2/BC composites (C/TiO2)BM for tannery wastewater treatment using this method [168]. Characterization showed that ball milling created oxygen vacancies and enhanced the graphitization of BC, improving electron transfer conditions and contributing to superior dye degradation performance compared to TiO2 alone.

Graphite (g-C3N4)/Biochar-Based Catalysts

g-C3N4, with its conjugated structure and semiconductor properties, effectively absorbs visible light to generate photoelectron-activated oxidants, which promote ROS for water pollutant degradation [169,170,171,172]. However, it faces challenges such as high electron-hole recombination efficiency, low visible light utilization, and limited surface area [173]. In contrast, BC offers excellent electrical conductivity and electron storage, enhancing g-C3N4’s photocatalytic performance by reducing electron-hole recombination. Sun et al. created a BC-modified hybrid photocatalyst with g-C3N4 and ferrite using bamboo fibers [174]. This catalyst achieved over 96.7% degradation of MO in 2 h under visible light with hydrogen peroxide. Compared to pure g-C3N4, it demonstrated a smaller band gap, lower electron transport resistance, and improved visible light absorption. Wang et al. used ultrasonic milling and KOH to activate BC, preparing ACB-K-gC3N4 [175]. Its photodegradation mechanism involved the oxidation of O2•−, holes, and HO, enhanced by the activated BC’s properties. Additionally, ACB and K+ ions improved electron transfer while preventing carrier recombination (Figure 7). Intimately coupled photocatalysis and biodegradation (ICPB) effectively remove persistent pollutants. Zhang et al. developed BC/g-C3N4 as a porous hydrogel for the ICPB system, achieving a tetracycline hydrochloride (TCH) removal rate of 96.0%, outperforming other systems [176]. Microorganisms facilitated pollutant degradation and enhanced TCH mineralization.

3.3.3. Heteroatom-Doped Biochar Catalysts in Photocatalytic Systems

Literature studies have shown that doping of BC with heteroatoms (S, C, N, etc.) enhances photosensitivity, increases photogenerated electron-hole pairs, and narrows semiconductor bandwidth [159,177]. Xiong et al. prepared nitrogen-doped TiO2 BC catalysts for the photodegradation of methylene blue, achieving a removal rate of 97.6% compared to 52.6% for undoped TiO2 [152]. XPS revealed nitrogen as substituted organic phases, creating new impurity energy levels that reduced the energy band gap and improved photocatalytic activity. Nitrogen incorporated into the TiO2 lattice decreased the energy band gap and enhanced visible light responsiveness. Sun et al. noted that nitrogen vacancies in BC/g-C3N4 composite catalysts, combined with bridging C and N vacancies, facilitated the separation and migration of photogenerated carriers [178]. Wang et al. utilized iodine doping to create visible light-induced BC photocatalysts, resulting in first-order degradation kinetics that were 24.7 and 23.7 times faster than undoped BC [179]. Iodine doping generated new micropores and mesopores, enhancing pollutant adsorption and subsequent degradation. It also narrowed the band gap and reduced electron transfer resistance, improving photocatalytic activity.

3.3.4. Composite Biochar-Based Catalysts in Photocatalytic Systems

The integration of BC with metallic photocatalysts has been widely explored. Yang et al. synthesized BiOBr/lignin-BC composites with oxygen vacancies to degrade rhodamine B via hydrothermal methods [160]. C doping increased oxygen vacancies and improved BiOBr’s visible light absorption, reducing carrier recombination. UV-visible diffuse reflectance spectroscopy showed that lignin enhanced BiOBr’s light absorption and facilitated electron-hole separation. Strong interactions between BiOBr and lignin-BC reduced charge transport resistance, improving separation efficiency and accelerating degradation. The electron-absorbing properties of BC enabled rapid electron transfer to surface-adsorbed O2, forming O2•−. Hosny et al. developed silver/ZnO@BC nanocomposites for tetracycline degradation using sonication and pyrolysis [180]. Under optimal conditions, silver/ZnO@BC achieved a degradation efficiency of 70.3%. UV irradiation generated electron-hole pairs, with free electrons reacting with oxygen to form ROS like O2•− and HO. Additionally, Ag/ZnO@BC showed effectiveness as an antimicrobial agent against Klebsiella pneumoniae and as a potential antioxidant material.

3.4. Application of Biochar-Based Catalysts in Sonocatalytic Systems

Ultrasonic irradiation induces localized pressure changes in liquids, causing bubble expansion, contraction, or rupture, which results in transient cavitation. This generates high temperatures (up to 3000 K) and pressures that produce HO from water molecules [181]. However, this acoustochemical process is often inefficient, with long processing times and high energy consumption. Studies show that carbon particles in the liquid phase can significantly enhance pollutant adsorption and degradation through ultrasound-induced surface activation [182,183,184,185]. Thus, BC-based catalysts can address these limitations [125]. Table 5 summarizes their applications in acoustic catalytic systems.

3.4.1. Native Biochar-Based Catalysts in Sonocatalytic Systems

Nikolaou et al. assessed the impact of rice husk BC on propyl hydroxybenzoate (PP) degradation under 20 kHz ultrasonic irradiation [183]. Results showed that PP removal was only 15% without BC but increased to about 70% with 125 mg·L−1 BC. Kim et al. found that at 300 kHz, BC exhibited low dispersion; therefore, the ultrasonic effect was stronger at 40 kHz, yielding a higher rhodamine B removal rate of 51.8% compared to 26.2% at 300 kHz [182]. ROS generation from the BC-based catalyst is detailed in Equations. (1)–(9). Li et al. introduced cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) to study its effects on the ultrasonic degradation of Orange II (OR II) by bagasse BC [190]. Results indicated that high CTAB concentrations or increased bagasse BC significantly enhanced catalytic efficiency. The synergistic effect of CTAB and BC improved degradation performance, with quenching experiments confirming the dominant role of HO. The degradation mechanism of OR II on the BC surface involves three steps: first, CTAB forms a complex with BC; second, negatively charged OR II is adsorbed onto the positively charged BC; and third, HO generated on the surface degrades OR II, with enhanced adsorption accelerating this reaction.
H 2 O + u l s t r a s o u n d H O + H
B C ( metals ) + B C ( metals ) e
B C ( metals ) e + O 2 B C ( metals ) + O 2
O 2 + H + H O 2
H O 2 + O 2 + H + H 2 O 2 + O 2
H 2 O 2 + e C B H O + O H
H O 2 + O 2 H O + O H + O 2
H 2 O + h V B + O H + H +
O H + h V B + O H

3.4.2. Composite-Based Biochar Catalysts in Sonocatalytic Systems

Cerium oxide (CeO2), a lanthanide metal oxide, can undergo redox cycling between +4 and +3 valences, making it a versatile catalyst for degrading organic pollutants [191]. BC-CeO2 nanoparticles, synthesized via hydrothermal methods by Khataee et al., demonstrated excellent acoustic catalytic performance, improving pollutant mass transfer from liquid to catalyst surface, leading to higher removal rates than single CeO2-H or BC alone [192]. The acoustic catalysis process generated a broad wavelength range of UV light, exciting CeO2 to produce HO, while BC facilitated electron transfer at the CeO2 interface, preventing electron-hole recombination.
Semiconductors, particularly when combined with BC, significantly enhance pollutant removal in acoustic catalysis [193]. Afzal et al. developed TiO2-encapsulated BC beads using pyrolyzed agricultural waste and chitosan for the effective degradation of ciprofloxacin (CIP) [186]. CIP degradation depended on ROS generated through acoustic catalysis, with HO being predominant. Microbubble implosion during sonication created high pressures (~1800 atm) and temperatures (up to 5000 K), dissociating water molecules to generate HO. This process allowed TiO2 electrons to mobilize efficiently, enhancing the production of HO and O2•−, which further degraded CIP (Figure 8). Gholami et al. synthesized Fe-Cu layered double hydroxide/BC nanocomposites to study their ultrasonic degradation activity for cefazolin sodium (CFZ), achieving a 97.6% degradation rate within 80 min after optimization [188]. Quenching experiments confirmed the dominant role of HO in CFZ degradation.

3.5. Application of Biochar-Based Catalysts in Electrocatalytic Systems

Electrochemical advanced oxidation processes (EAOPs) rely on oxidation reactions at the anode, generating oxygen through water electrolysis. Electrons are transferred to the cathode to produce H2O2 via a two-electron oxygen reduction reaction (2e−ORR), which is subsequently catalyzed to generate HO radicals capable of degrading organic pollutants [194]. Electrode material selection critically affects current efficiency, H2O2 generation, selectivity, mechanism, and pollutant degradation efficiency [195]. Anode materials should possess catalytic activity and stability, including NiMnO3, Fe2O3, Ti/metal oxides, and carbon/graphite felts [196,197,198,199]. Various cathode materials have been developed to enhance in situ H2O2 generation, including graphite felts, noble metals (e.g., Pt, Au, Pd), and metal oxides (e.g., CeO2, SnO2) [200,201,202,203]. However, these materials can be costly and unsustainable. BC’s physicochemical properties, such as high conductivity and large surface area, enhance its use in EAOPs [204]. Table 6 summarizes BC applications in electrocatalysis.

3.5.1. Native Biochar Electrode in Electrocatalytic Systems

Ansari et al. evaluated a stainless steel mesh-wrapped banana-peel-derived BC (BB) cathode for in situ H2O2 generation, targeting the degradation of bromophenol blue (BPB) and Congo red (CR) dyes [208]. Up to 9.4 mg·L−1 of H2O2 was generated after 60 min using 2.0 g of BB at a current of 100 mA under pH-neutral conditions, achieving removal efficiencies of 87.44% for BPB and 83.63% for CR. Kim et al. employed banana-peel-derived BC (BP-BC) in a continuous-flow reactor for ibuprofen (IBP) degradation [209]. The BP-BC cathode produced H2O2 via 2e−ORR, catalyzing its decomposition to generate HO, which oxidized IBP. However, limited surface functional groups restricted H2O2 generation (~3.4 mg·mL−1), resulting in only ~40% IBP degradation. The addition of PS significantly improved IBP removal, enabling the co-generation of HO and SO4•− radicals, achieving nearly 100% degradation. Ma et al. incorporated ball-milled, acetic acid-modified sludge BC (BASBC) into wastewater, establishing an electrocatalytic system that resulted in 86.1% mineralization efficiency for imidacloprid [206]. BASBC provided abundant catalytic sites, activating PS directly while supplying electrons for continuous generation of -COOH and -OH groups, enhancing PS activation to produce more ROS.

3.5.2. Metal-Based Biochar Catalysts in Electrocatalytic Systems

Iron-carbon (Fe-C) microelectrolysis is an effective water treatment technology [216]. In this system, cast iron and activated carbon serve as electrode materials, where Fe0 loses electrons at the anode to generate Fe2+, while C accelerates reduction at the cathode [217]. Recent studies indicate that BC can replace activated carbon in Fe-C microelectrolysis systems. Li et al. developed catalytic Fe-C microelectrolysis granules (FeBCG) from Fe powder and sawdust, using them as PS activators to remove bisphenol A (BPA); optimal conditions yielded 100% removal within 20 min [218]. Burst, EPR, and electrochemical experiments demonstrated the involvement of SO4•−, O2•−, HO, 1O2, and electron transfer in BPA removal, with chrono-current measurements indicating significant current changes upon PS and BPA addition, suggesting electron transfer between the FeBCG surface and both substrates. BC’s application in ferrocarbon microelectrolysis presents unique advantages, offering a cost-effective and efficient approach for developing BC-based electrocatalytic systems. Yu et al. utilized bimetallic-modified BC (MBC) as a cathode for tetracycline (TC) removal via PS activation, noting that the electric field enhanced the cathode’s catalytic activation by a factor of 2 to 5 [219]. The electric field boosted PS activation at specific sites on the catalytic surface, improving Mn+ regeneration efficiency.

3.5.3. Heteroatom-Doped Biochar Catalysts in Electrocatalytic Systems

Nitrogen atoms, being more electronegative than carbon, induce positive charges on adjacent carbon atoms, facilitating O2 adsorption and reducing the overpotential of the oxygen reduction reaction [220]. Research shows that O-O bonding in perovskites involves O2 first adsorbing on positively charged carbon, then receiving electrons from nitrogen dopants, which lowers the energy threshold for O2 dissociation [221]. In electrocatalysis, nitrogen doping enhances the H2O2 yield of carbon-based cathodes [222]. Zhang et al. prepared nitrogen-doped BC from nitrogen-enriched coffee residues, creating a homogeneous air cathode (BCAC) for tetracycline (TC) degradation [214]. Experiments showed that BCAC-900 achieved 70.42% TC removal in 120 min at 4 mA cm⁻2. Free radical quenching experiments indicated that HO (37.36%), O2•− (29.67%), and 1O2 (24.17%) were crucial for TC removal, with graphitic N acting as a key site for H2O2 generation and HO activation. Both graphitic N and nitrogen vacancies served as active sites for O2•− and 1O2 generation. Luo et al. synthesized porous BC electrocatalysts co-doped with nitrogen and oxygen from peanut shells, achieving up to 92% H2O2 selectivity and an activation rate of 82% [223].

3.5.4. Metal/Heteroatom-Doped Biochar Catalysts in Electrocatalytic Systems

Metal/heteroatom doping enhances the electrical conductivity and active sites of BC compared to undoped variants [204]. Ge et al. created a BC particle electrode (BCPE) from residual sludge and modified it on a nickel foam electrode to form a BC-catalyzed cathode (BCCC) for activating peroxodisulfate (PS) degradation from sulfonamide dimethylpyrimidine (SMZ) (Figure 9) [210]. They examined the catalytic performance of three-dimensional electrochemical systems (3DERs) with BCPE versus two-dimensional systems with BCCC. BC from pyrolyzed residual sludge was milled to create granular electrodes for the electrically activated PS reaction, involving PS (solution), nickel foam (cathode), and platinum (anode). Both BCPE and BCCC exhibited good catalytic performance, but their mechanisms differed. In the BCPE system, BCPE activated PS through electrostatic induction, while a small amount of Fe2⁺ also contributed. The BCCC system allowed more direct electron and energy transfer, enhancing SMZ oxidation. Zhang et al. developed Ti, Sn, and Ce-doped bamboo charcoal for 3DERs to efficiently treat coking wastewater [212]. The doping improved the electrooxidation and electrocatalytic properties, particularly with Ce enhancing HO generation. Additionally, BC can be made into electrocatalytic membranes. Yin et al. constructed Fe/N co-doped BC-based ultrafiltration membranes for the electrically assisted degradation of tetracycline and membrane fouling control [215]. The Fe-g-C3N4/ABC-600/Graphite/PVDF membrane achieved 100% tetracycline removal in 0.749 min and demonstrated excellent self-cleaning performance (100% flux recovery) with low energy consumption (0.199 W-h/L) in municipal wastewater treatment. Oxygen-rich functional groups and nitrogen species (e.g., pyridine N and pyrrole N) enhance H2O2 generation and accelerate Fe (III)/Fe (II) cycling, offering innovative pathways for developing advanced electrocatalytic systems.

4. Biochar Regeneration

BC can be regenerated after water treatment through chemical, biological, and physical methods. Chemical regeneration involves treating BC with acids, bases, or oxidizing agents (e.g., NaOH, HCl, H2O2) to remove adsorbed contaminants. This method is recognized as a sustainable technology that reduces both cost and energy consumption. The effectiveness of chemical regeneration depends on factors such as the adsorption mechanism, functional groups, the adsorbent’s pore structure, and changes in active adsorption sites [224]. Chemical regeneration is particularly effective for removing a wide range of pollutants, especially organic compounds and heavy metals [225,226,227,228]. However, high desorption efficiencies do not always correlate with high regeneration performance [229], and secondary toxic substances may adversely affect the stability of pollutants removed from the BC [224].
Biological regeneration is the process by which microorganisms renew the activated adsorbent sites in the BC’s pore structure [230]. Microorganisms utilize organic substrates from their metabolism to restore the adsorption capacity of the BC. This method is safer, more cost-effective, and environmentally friendly compared to steam and chemical regeneration [231]. However, bio-regeneration is influenced by factors such as dissolved oxygen levels and the structural characteristics of the BC [232].
Physical regeneration involves removing adsorbed contaminants from BC through thermal treatments (e.g., incineration or charring) or other physical methods such as steam vaporization [233,234,235]. During steam regeneration, steam rapidly heats the adsorbent bed, facilitating faster desorption of contaminants. However, desorption is only effective if the bed reaches a sufficiently high temperature to maintain the desorbate in the gaseous phase, allowing for efficient removal [231]. High-temperature regeneration involves complex physical and chemical processes influenced by numerous parameters. These factors directly impact the efficiency of carbon regeneration, which in turn determines the ability of BC to recover its adsorption capacity [236]. Additionally, thermally regenerated BC can be utilized for advanced oxidation processes, among other applications [237,238].

5. Pilot-Scale Biochar Water Treatment

Pilot-scale experiments are essential for evaluating the feasibility of applying biochar in practical settings. However, research on the removal of organic and inorganic pollutants in pilot-scale BC reactors is limited, with most studies focusing primarily on BC’s use as an adsorbent. James et al. investigated the impact of scaling up from laboratory- to pilot-scale production on BC quality, using a series of 100 mm × 1200 mm cylindrical treatment cells installed at the discharge point of an abandoned mine to facilitate pilot-scale BC deployment [239]. Under laboratory conditions, most BCs produced in the trial demonstrated higher zinc removal; however, when tested in the field, all BC exhibited a reduction in performance, ranging from 14% to 85%, depending on the BC type. Lnyang and Dickenson conducted a pilot study using three parallel adsorbents—granular activated carbon, anthracite, and hardwood BC—to treat tertiary filtration wastewater [240]. Granular activated carbon achieved the best reduction of perfluoropentanoic acid, perfluorohexanoic acid, perfluorooctanoic acid, perfluorooctanesulfonic acid, and dissolved organic carbon, followed by hardwood BC, with anthracite demonstrating the least effectiveness. These studies highlight the discrepancy between BC performance in laboratory-scale experiments and practical applications, underscoring the need for pilot-scale testing.

6. Conclusion and Prospects

The concept of using BC to treat wastewater has garnered significant interest among researchers. Employing low-cost and readily available BC as an adsorbent and catalyst for pollutant removal in various treatment systems marks an important advancement in water treatment. BC’s large surface area and high porosity provide excellent adsorption properties, while its PFRs and OFGs promote the generation of ROS and sulfate radicals. Its porous structure also allows for modifications (e.g., doping with transition metals and heteroatoms), enhancing its catalytic performance. As a result, BC has been effectively utilized in adsorption, Fenton-like reactions, photocatalysis, acoustic catalysis, and electrocatalysis for removing diverse pollutants. However, further research is needed to transition from experimental studies to large-scale applications.
Testing BC-based materials in real wastewater treatment is essential for their broader industrial adoption. Real wastewater is more complex than lab-simulated versions, containing a variety of pollutants and potential interferences. Research must focus on the stability and long-term reuse of BC under real wastewater conditions to ensure effectiveness and economic viability. Additionally, exploring the selective removal capabilities of BC for different contaminants is crucial for developing multifunctional wastewater treatment technologies.
The cost of implementing BC-based materials is a key factor for their large-scale promotion. These materials often need to be combined with other treatment technologies—such as electrocatalysis and photocatalysis—to improve efficiency, which can increase energy consumption and reagent costs. Therefore, developing BC-based systems should prioritize cost reduction and resource optimization to ensure feasibility in industrial applications. Moreover, challenges related to the recyclability of BC must be addressed. Low-energy and efficient catalytic systems will enhance the market competitiveness of BC and promote its use in wastewater treatment.
Machine learning (ML), a branch of artificial intelligence, can significantly reduce the workload and costs associated with trial-and-error in wastewater remediation [241,242]. For instance, ML models can be used to optimize the pyrolysis process and predict BC yield [243]. Additionally, ML can accurately forecast the pollutant removal efficiency of BC-based materials and identify optimal conditions for pollutant treatment [244]. Overall, machine learning holds considerable potential for advancing the application of biomass-derived BC in sustainable practices and the circular economy.
Despite their promising applications, the environmental and health impacts of BC-based materials must be considered. Studies indicate that BC can contain polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and trace heavy metals that may be released during treatment, potentially affecting human health and ecosystems. Future research should investigate the toxic effects of these substances and develop methods to minimize by-product generation, ensuring the safety and environmental friendliness of BC in practical wastewater treatment.
In conclusion, future research on BC-based materials for wastewater treatment should focus on the following directions: (1) increasing pilot-scale and industrial-scale studies to develop practical, recyclable, low-energy, and efficient pollutant removal systems; (2) investigating the toxicity of BC-based materials in real wastewater treatment applications and exploring conditions for toxicity regulation; and (3) employing ML to develop predictive models that optimize both the production conditions of BC-based materials and the wastewater treatment processes.

Author Contributions

M.H.—Conceptualization, Investigation, Supervision, writing—original draft. Z.L.—Visualization, formal analysis, Supervision, writing—original draft. S.H.—Methodology, formal analysis, supervision, writing—original draft. H.Z.—Supervision, validation, writing—review, and editing. H.Y.—Validation, writing—review, and editing. Y.L.—Validation, writing—review, and editing. K.Z.—Supervision, project administration, writing—review, and editing. Y.Z.—Supervision, writing—review, and editing, funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Natural Science Foundation Project of Sichuan Province (No. 2023NSFSC0899).

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

Huanxing Zhang was employed by the company Luoyang Petrochemical Engineering Design Co., Ltd., Yuan Liu was employed by the company Chengdu Tiantou Industry Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. du Plessis, A. Persistent Degradation: Global Water Quality Challenges and Required Actions. One Earth 2022, 5, 129–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Briffa, J.; Sinagra, E.; Blundell, R. Heavy Metal Pollution in the Environment and Their Toxicological Effects on Humans. Heliyon 2020, 6, e04691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gautam, P.K.; Gautam, R.K.; Banerjee, S.; Chattopadhyaya, M.C.; Pandey, J.D. Heavy metals in the environment: Fate, transport, toxicity and remediation technologies. Nova 2016, 60, 101–130. [Google Scholar]
  4. Chen, W.; Meng, J.; Han, X.; Lan, Y.; Zhang, W. Past, Present, and Future of Biochar. Biochar 2019, 1, 75–87. [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen, S.S.; Cao, Y.; Tsang, D.C.W.; Tessonnier, J.-P.; Shang, J.; Hou, D.; Shen, Z.; Zhang, S.; Ok, Y.S.; Wu, K.C.-W. Effective Dispersion of MgO Nanostructure on Biochar Support as a Basic Catalyst for Glucose Isomerization. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 6990–7001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Igalavithana, A.D.; Choi, S.W.; Dissanayake, P.D.; Shang, J.; Wang, C.-H.; Yang, X.; Kim, S.; Tsang, D.C.W.; Lee, K.B.; Ok, Y.S. Gasification Biochar from Biowaste (Food Waste and Wood Waste) for Effective CO2 Adsorption. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 391, 121147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ma, Y.; Yao, Y.; Qian, S.; Deng, Z.; Liu, Y.; Ma, J.; Zhang, Z. Ball Milling Boosted Hydrothermal N-Doped Sludge-Derived Biochar towards Efficiently Adsorptive Removal of Sulfamethoxazole from Waters: Behavior, Mechanism and DFT Study. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024, 338, 126453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kambo, H.S.; Dutta, A. A Comparative Review of Biochar and Hydrochar in Terms of Production, Physico-Chemical Properties and Applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 45, 359–378. [Google Scholar]
  9. Aller, M.F. Biochar Properties: Transport, Fate, and Impact. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 46, 1183–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Weber, K.; Quicker, P. Properties of Biochar. Fuel 2018, 217, 240–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Huang, Y.W.; Chen, W.F.; Sun, D.Q.; Guan, X.C.; Zhang, W.M.; Yu, L.; Gao, J.P.; Meng, J. Research on Physical and Chemical Properties of Different Biochars. Adv. Mater. Res. 2012, 518–523, 807–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, X.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Tian, W.; Khan, E.; Tsang, D.C.W. Leaching Characteristics of Nutrients in Food Waste Digestate-Derived Biochar. Bioresour. Technol. 2024, 399, 130634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ameloot, N.; Graber, E.R.; Verheijen, F.G.A.; De Neve, S. Interactions between Biochar Stability and Soil Organisms: Review and Research Needs. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2013, 64, 379–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wu, J.; Yi, Y.; Li, Y.; Fang, Z.; Tsang, E.P. Excellently Reactive Ni/Fe Bimetallic Catalyst Supported by Biochar for the Remediation of Decabromodiphenyl Contaminated Soil: Reactivity, Mechanism, Pathways and Reducing Secondary Risks. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016, 320, 341–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zeghioud, H.; Fryda, L.; Djelal, H.; Assadi, A.; Kane, A. A Comprehensive Review of Biochar in Removal of Organic Pollutants from Wastewater: Characterization, Toxicity, Activation/Functionalization and Influencing Treatment Factors. J. Water Process Eng. 2022, 47, 102801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tang, C.; Ni, Z.; Xu, C.; Luo, Y.; Cai, X.; Gao, Q.; Fang, Y.; Zhong, G.; Qiu, R.; Zhang, S. Enhanced Adsorption of Organic Pollutants Using N-Doped Porous Carbon Derived from Hemp Stems: Insights into the Mechanism. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024, 333, 125878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhou, X.; Lai, C.; Almatrafi, E.; Liu, S.; Yan, H.; Qian, S.; Li, H.; Qin, L.; Yi, H.; Fu, Y.; et al. Unveiling the Roles of Dissolved Organic Matters Derived from Different Biochar in Biochar/Persulfate System: Mechanism and Toxicity. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 864, 161062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kou, L.; Wang, J.; Zhao, L.; Jiang, K.; Xu, X. Coupling of KMnO4-Assisted Sludge Dewatering and Pyrolysis to Prepare Mn, Fe-Co doped Biochar Catalysts for Peroxymonosulfate-Induced Elimination of Phenolic Pollutants. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 411, 128459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, P.; O’Connor, D.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, L.; Xia, T.; Wang, L.; Tsang, D.C.W.; Ok, Y.S.; Hou, D. A Green Biochar/Iron Oxide Composite for Methylene Blue Removal. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 384, 121286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Deng, Y.; Zhao, R. Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs) in Wastewater Treatment. Curr. Pollut. Rep. 2015, 1, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sun, Z.; Hao, C.; Toan, S.; Zhang, R.; Li, H.; Wu, Y.; Liu, H.; Sun, Z. Recent Advances in Exsolved Perovskite Oxide Construction: Exsolution Theory, Modulation, Challenges, and Prospects. J. Mater. Chem. A 2023, 11, 17961–17976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gupta, A.D.; Singh, H.; Varjani, S.; Awasthi, M.K.; Giri, B.S.; Pandey, A. A Critical Review on Biochar-Based Catalysts for the Abatement of Toxic Pollutants from Water via Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs). Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 849, 157831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Chen, N.; Huang, Y.; Hou, X.; Ai, Z.; Zhang, L. Photochemistry of Hydrochar: Reactive Oxygen Species Generation and Sulfadimidine Degradation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 11278–11287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ruan, X.; Sun, Y.; Du, W.; Tang, Y.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Doherty, W.; Frost, R.L.; Qian, G.; Tsang, D.C.W. Formation, Characteristics, and Applications of Environmentally Persistent Free Radicals in Biochars: A Review. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 281, 457–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chen, L.; Jiang, X.; Xie, R.; Zhang, Y.; Jin, Y.; Jiang, W. A Novel Porous Biochar-Supported Fe-Mn Composite as a Persulfate Activator for the Removal of Acid Red 88. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 250, 117232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liang, F.; Liu, Z.; Jiang, X.; Li, J.; Xiao, K.; Xu, W.; Chen, X.; Liang, J.; Lin, Z.; Li, M.; et al. NaOH-Modified Biochar Supported Fe/Mn Bimetallic Composites as Efficient Peroxymonosulfate Activator for Enhance Tetracycline Removal. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 454, 139949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Qi, G.; Pan, Z.; Zhang, X.; Miao, X.; Xiang, W.; Gao, B. Effect of Ball Milling with Hydrogen Peroxide or Ammonia Hydroxide on Sorption Performance of Volatile Organic Compounds by Biochar from Different Pyrolysis Temperatures. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 450, 138027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fan, X.; Yu, Y.; Dong, S.; Liu, Y.; Song, C.; Li, Q.; Wang, X. Heteroatoms-Doped Biochar Derived from Deciduous Resource as Persulfate Catalysts for Efficient Degradation of Phenol. J. Water Process Eng. 2022, 48, 102866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Welter, N.; Leichtweis, J.; Silvestri, S.; Sánchez, P.I.Z.; Mejía, A.C.C.; Carissimi, E. Preparation of a New Green Composite Based on Chitin Biochar and ZnFe2O4 for Photo-Fenton Degradation of Rhodamine B. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 901, 163758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. He, D.; Zhu, K.; Huang, J.; Shen, Y.; Lei, L.; He, H.; Chen, W. N, S Co-Doped Magnetic Mesoporous Carbon Nanosheets for Activating Peroxymonosulfate to Rapidly Degrade Tetracycline: Synergistic Effect and Mechanism. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 424, 127569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, L.; Liu, S.; Cheng, M.; Lai, C.; Zeng, G.; Qin, L.; Liu, X.; Li, B.; Zhang, W.; Yi, Y.; et al. Improving the Fenton-like Catalytic Performance of MnOx-Fe3O4/Biochar Using Reducing Agents: A Comparative Study. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 406, 124333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Jiang, T.; Wang, B.; Gao, B.; Cheng, N.; Feng, Q.; Chen, M.; Wang, S. Degradation of Organic Pollutants from Water by Biochar-Assisted Advanced Oxidation Processes: Mechanisms and Applications. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 442, 130075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yu, Y.; Huang, F.; He, Y.; Liu, X.; Song, C.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, Y. Heterogeneous Fenton-like Degradation of Ofloxacin over Sludge Derived Carbon as Catalysts: Mechanism and Performance. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 654, 942–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, C.; Sun, R.; Huang, R. Highly Dispersed Iron-Doped Biochar Derived from Sawdust for Fenton-like Degradation of Toxic Dyes. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 297, 126681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hu, P.; Long, M. Cobalt-Catalyzed Sulfate Radical-Based Advanced Oxidation: A Review on Heterogeneous Catalysts and Applications. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016, 181, 103–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ding, D.; Yang, S.; Qian, X.; Chen, L.; Cai, T. Nitrogen-Doping Positively Whilst Sulfur-Doping Negatively Affect the Catalytic Activity of Biochar for the Degradation of Organic Contaminant. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2020, 263, 118348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Canonica, S.; Kohn, T.; Mac, M.; Real, F.J.; Wirz, J.; von Gunten, U. Photosensitizer Method to Determine Rate Constants for the Reaction of Carbonate Radical with Organic Compounds. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 9182–9188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, M.; Li, P.; Zhang, L.; Chen, M.; Tang, J.; Qin, C.; Ling Jie Lee, S.; Lin, S. Facile Fabrication of ZnO Decorated ZnFe-Layered Double Hydroxides @ Biochar Nanocomposites for Synergistic Photodegradation of Tetracycline under Visible Light. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 434, 134772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tan, X.; Liu, Y.; Zeng, G.; Wang, X.; Hu, X.; Gu, Y.; Yang, Z. Application of Biochar for the Removal of Pollutants from Aqueous Solutions. Chemosphere 2015, 125, 70–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, D.-C.; Jiang, H. The Thermochemical Conversion of Non-Lignocellulosic Biomass to Form Biochar: A Review on Characterizations and Mechanism Elucidation. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 246, 57–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Qin, F.; Zhang, C.; Zeng, G.; Huang, D.; Tan, X.; Duan, A. Lignocellulosic Biomass Carbonization for Biochar Production and Characterization of Biochar Reactivity. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 157, 112056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Minakshi, M.; Mujeeb, A.; Whale, J.; Evans, R.; Aughterson, R.; Shinde, P.A.; Ariga, K.; Shrestha, L.K. Synthesis of Porous Carbon Honeycomb Structures Derived from Hemp for Hybrid Supercapacitors with Improved Electrochemistry. ChemPlusChem 2024, e202400408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Minakshi, M.; Samayamanthry, A.; Whale, J.; Aughterson, R.; Shinde, P.A.; Ariga, K.; Kumar Shrestha, L. Phosphorous—Containing Activated Carbon Derived from Natural Honeydew Peel Powers Aqueous Supercapacitors. Chem. Asian J. 2024, 19, e202400622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wang, C.; Xie, Q.; Dou, X.; Zhang, L.; Yang, X. Conversion of Carbonaceous Materials into Solid Acids for Tylosin Mitigation: Effect of Preprocessing Methods on the Reactivity of Sulfonation Reaction. Biochar 2023, 5, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mohammad, I.N.; Ongkudon, C.M.; Misson, M. Physicochemical Properties and Lignin Degradation of Thermal-Pretreated Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch. Energies 2020, 13, 5966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sitotaw, Y.W.; Habtu, N.G.; Gebreyohannes, A.Y.; Nunes, S.P.; Van Gerven, T. Ball Milling as an Important Pretreatment Technique in Lignocellulose Biorefineries: A Review. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2023, 13, 15593–15616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, C.; Wang, H.; Yang, C.; Dang, B.; Li, C.; Sun, Q. A Multilevel Gradient Structural Carbon Derived from Naturally Preprocessed Biomass. Carbon 2020, 168, 624–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cueva, L.L.Z.; Griffin, G.J.; Ward, L.P.; Madapusi, S.; Shah, K.; Parthasarathy, R. A Study of Chemical Pre-Treatment and Pyrolysis Operating Conditions to Enhance Biochar Production from Rice Straw. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2022, 163, 105455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhao, L.; Zheng, W.; Mašek, O.; Chen, X.; Gu, B.; Sharma, B.K.; Cao, X. Roles of Phosphoric Acid in Biochar Formation: Synchronously Improving Carbon Retention and Sorption Capacity. J Environ. Qual. 2017, 46, 393–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chen, Q.; Wang, Y.; He, G.; Yilmaz, M.; Yuan, S. KMnO4-Activated Spinach Waste Biochar: An Efficient Adsorbent for Adsorption of Heavy Metal Ions in Aqueous Solution. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2024, 684, 133174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yang, J.; Tang, S.; Mei, W.; Chen, Y.; Yi, W.; Lv, P.; Yang, G. Valorising Lignocellulosic Biomass to High-Performance Electrocatalysts via Anaerobic Digestion Pretreatment. Biochar 2024, 6, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Prasad, B.R.; Padhi, R.K.; Ghosh, G. A Review on Key Pretreatment Approaches for Lignocellulosic Biomass to Produce Biofuel and Value-Added Products. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 20, 6929–6944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Panwar, N.L.; Pawar, A. Influence of Activation Conditions on the Physicochemical Properties of Activated Biochar: A Review. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2022, 12, 925–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Huang, J.; Zimmerman, A.R.; Chen, H.; Gao, B. Ball Milled Biochar Effectively Removes Sulfamethoxazole and Sulfapyridine Antibiotics from Water and Wastewater. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 258, 113809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Zhang, Q.; Wang, J.; Lyu, H.; Zhao, Q.; Jiang, L.; Liu, L. Ball-Milled Biochar for Galaxolide Removal: Sorption Performance and Governing Mechanisms. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 659, 1537–1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Di Stasi, C.; Greco, G.; Canevesi, R.L.S.; Izquierdo, M.T.; Fierro, V.; Celzard, A.; González, B.; Manyà, J.J. Influence of Activation Conditions on Textural Properties and Performance of Activated Biochars for Pyrolysis Vapors Upgrading. Fuel 2021, 289, 119759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Gadore, V.; Mishra, S.R.; Ahmaruzzaman, M. Bio-Inspired Sustainable Synthesis of Novel SnS2/Biochar Nanocomposite for Adsorption Coupled Photodegradation of Amoxicillin and Congo Red: Effects of Reaction Parameters, and Water Matrices. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 334, 117496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Xu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Li, B.; Fan, S.; Xu, H.; Guan, D.-X. Improved Adsorption Properties of Tetracycline on KOH/KMnO4 Modified Biochar Derived from Wheat Straw. Chemosphere 2022, 296, 133981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Li, J.; Liu, Y.; Ren, X.; Dong, W.; Chen, H.; Cai, T.; Zeng, W.; Li, W.; Tang, L. Soybean Residue Based Biochar Prepared by Ball Milling Assisted Alkali Activation to Activate Peroxydisulfate for the Degradation of Tetracycline. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 599, 631–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yu, F.; Tian, F.; Zou, H.; Ye, Z.; Peng, C.; Huang, J.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Wei, X.; et al. ZnO/Biochar Nanocomposites via Solvent Free Ball Milling for Enhanced Adsorption and Photocatalytic Degradation of Methylene Blue. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 415, 125511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Cha, J.S.; Park, S.H.; Jung, S.-C.; Ryu, C.; Jeon, J.-K.; Shin, M.-C.; Park, Y.-K. Production and Utilization of Biochar: A Review. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2016, 40, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wang, J.; Wang, S. Preparation, Modification and Environmental Application of Biochar: A Review. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 227, 1002–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. El Bari, H.; Fanezoune, C.K.; Dorneanu, B.; Arellano-Garcia, H.; Majozi, T.; Elhenawy, Y.; Bayssi, O.; Hirt, A.; Peixinho, J.; Dhahak, A.; et al. Catalytic Fast Pyrolysis of Lignocellulosic Biomass: Recent Advances and Comprehensive Overview. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2024, 178, 106390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sekar, M.; Mathimani, T.; Alagumalai, A.; Chi, N.T.L.; Duc, P.A.; Bhatia, S.K.; Brindhadevi, K.; Pugazhendhi, A. A Review on the Pyrolysis of Algal Biomass for Biochar and Bio-Oil—Bottlenecks and Scope. Fuel 2021, 283, 119190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ghodake, G.S.; Shinde, S.K.; Kadam, A.A.; Saratale, R.G.; Saratale, G.D.; Kumar, M.; Palem, R.R.; AL-Shwaiman, H.A.; Elgorban, A.M.; Syed, A.; et al. Review on Biomass Feedstocks, Pyrolysis Mechanism and Physicochemical Properties of Biochar: State-of-the-Art Framework to Speed up Vision of Circular Bioeconomy. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 297, 126645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Das, S.K.; Ghosh, G.K.; Avasthe, R.K.; Sinha, K. Compositional Heterogeneity of Different Biochar: Effect of Pyrolysis Temperature and Feedstocks. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 278, 111501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Prasannamedha, G.; Kumar, P.S.; Mehala, R.; Sharumitha, T.J.; Surendhar, D. Enhanced Adsorptive Removal of Sulfamethoxazole from Water Using Biochar Derived from Hydrothermal Carbonization of Sugarcane Bagasse. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 407, 124825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Shao, Y.; Li, C.; Fan, M.; Gao, G.; Jiang, Y.; Sun, K.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, S.; Xu, L.; Hu, X. Torrefaction and Hydrothermal Carbonization Pretreatments of Rice Impact Nature of Biochar from Subsequent Pyrolysis. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023, 205, 117515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Xu, S.; Chen, J.; Peng, H.; Leng, S.; Li, H.; Qu, W.; Hu, Y.; Li, H.; Jiang, S.; Zhou, W.; et al. Effect of Biomass Type and Pyrolysis Temperature on Nitrogen in Biochar, and the Comparison with Hydrochar. Fuel 2021, 291, 120128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Genli, N.; Kutluay, S.; Baytar, O.; Şahin, Ö. Preparation and Characterization of Activated Carbon from Hydrochar by Hydrothermal Carbonization of Chickpea Stem: An Application in Methylene Blue Removal by RSM Optimization. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2022, 24, 88–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Liu, Y.; Paskevicius, M.; Sofianos, M.V.; Parkinson, G.; Li, C.-Z. In Situ SAXS Studies of the Pore Development in Biochar during Gasification. Carbon 2021, 172, 454–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Del Grosso, M.; Cutz, L.; Tiringer, U.; Tsekos, C.; Taheri, P.; de Jong, W. Influence of Indirectly Heated Steam-Blown Gasification Process Conditions on Biochar Physico-Chemical Properties. Fuel Process. Technol. 2022, 235, 107347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Akgül, A.; Akın, S.Ş.; Güleç, F.; Kazanç, F. Biochar Gasification: Insights from Pyrolysis Atmospheres and Gasification Heating Rates. Fuel 2024, 360, 130469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Tang, J.; Zhu, W.; Kookana, R.; Katayama, A. Characteristics of Biochar and Its Application in Remediation of Contaminated Soil. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2013, 116, 653–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Leng, L.; Yang, L.; Lei, X.; Zhang, W.; Ai, Z.; Yang, Z.; Zhan, H.; Yang, J.; Yuan, X.; Peng, H.; et al. Machine Learning Predicting and Engineering the Yield, N Content, and Specific Surface Area of Biochar Derived from Pyrolysis of Biomass. Biochar 2022, 4, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wystalska, K.; Kwarciak-Kozlowska, A.; Wlodarczyk, R. Influence of Technical Parameters of the Pyrolysis Process on the Surface Area, Porosity, and Hydrophobicity of Biochar from Sunflower Husk Pellet. Sustainability 2023, 15, 394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ouyang, D.; Chen, Y.; Yan, J.; Qian, L.; Han, L.; Chen, M. Activation Mechanism of Peroxymonosulfate by Biochar for Catalytic Degradation of 1,4-Dioxane: Important Role of Biochar Defect Structures. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 370, 614–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Huang, H.; Wang, Y.-X.; Tang, J.-C.; Tang, J.-C.; Zhu, W.-Y. Properties of maize stalk biochar produced under different pyrolysis temperatures and its sorption capability to naphthalene. Huan Jing Ke Xue 2014, 35, 1884–1890. [Google Scholar]
  79. Lian, F.; Huang, F.; Chen, W.; Xing, B.; Zhu, L. Sorption of Apolar and Polar Organic Contaminants by Waste Tire Rubber and Its Chars in Single- and Bi-Solute Systems. Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159, 850–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Lehmann, J.; Joseph, S. (Eds.) Biochar for Environmental Management: Science, Technology and Implementation, 2nd ed.; Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group: London, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2015; ISBN 978-0-415-70415-1. [Google Scholar]
  81. Deng, J.; Xiong, T.; Wang, H.; Zheng, A.; Wang, Y. Effects of Cellulose, Hemicellulose, and Lignin on the Structure and Morphology of Porous Carbons. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 3750–3756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Daifullah, A.A.M.; Girgis, B.S.; Gad, H.M.H. A Study of the Factors Affecting the Removal of Humic Acid by Activated Carbon Prepared from Biomass Material. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2004, 235, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Li, W.; Zhang, L.; Peng, J.; Li, N.; Zhu, X. Preparation of High Surface Area Activated Carbons from Tobacco Stems with K2CO3 Activation Using Microwave Radiation. Ind. Crops Prod. 2008, 27, 341–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Auta, M.; Hameed, B.H. Preparation of Waste Tea Activated Carbon Using Potassium Acetate as an Activating Agent for Adsorption of Acid Blue 25 Dye. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 171, 502–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Xiang, W.; Zhang, X.; Chen, J.; Zou, W.; He, F.; Hu, X.; Tsang, D.C.W.; Ok, Y.S.; Gao, B. Biochar Technology in Wastewater Treatment: A Critical Review. Chemosphere 2020, 252, 126539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Jiang, H.; Li, X.; Dai, Y. Phosphoric Acid Activation of Cow Dung Biochar for Adsorbing Enrofloxacin in Water: Icing on the Cake. Environ. Pollut. 2024, 341, 122887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Zhuo, S.-N.; Dai, T.-C.; Ren, H.-Y.; Liu, B.-F. Simultaneous Adsorption of Phosphate and Tetracycline by Calcium Modified Corn Stover Biochar: Performance and Mechanism. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 359, 127477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Hu, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Lin, T.; Zeng, G.; Zhang, S.; Wang, Y.; He, W.; Zhang, M.; Long, H. An Efficient Adsorbent: Simultaneous Activated and Magnetic ZnO Doped Biochar Derived from Camphor Leaves for Ciprofloxacin Adsorption. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 288, 121511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Luo, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Xue, M.; Zheng, A.; Han, Y.; Yin, Z.; Hong, Z.; Xie, C.; Li, X.; et al. Ball-Milled Bismuth Oxychloride/Biochar Nanocomposites with Rich Oxygen Vacancies for Reactive Red-120 Adsorption in Aqueous Solution. Biochar 2022, 4, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Nguyen, T.-B.; Nguyen, T.-K.-T.; Chen, W.-H.; Chen, C.-W.; Bui, X.-T.; Patel, A.K.; Dong, C.-D. Hydrothermal and Pyrolytic Conversion of Sunflower Seed Husk into Novel Porous Biochar for Efficient Adsorption of Tetracycline. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 373, 128711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Zhang, F.; Wang, J.; Tian, Y.; Liu, C.; Zhang, S.; Cao, L.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, S. Effective Removal of Tetracycline Antibiotics from Water by Magnetic Functionalized Biochar Derived from Rice Waste. Environ. Pollut. 2023, 330, 121681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Li, Z.; Tian, W.; Chu, M.; Zou, M.; Zhao, J. Molecular Imprinting Functionalization of Magnetic Biochar to Adsorb Sulfamethoxazole: Mechanism, Regeneration and Targeted Adsorption. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2023, 171, 238–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Wu, J.; Wang, T.; Liu, Y.; Tang, W.; Geng, S.; Chen, J. Norfloxacin Adsorption and Subsequent Degradation on Ball-Milling Tailored N-Doped Biochar. Chemosphere 2022, 303, 135264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Che, H.; Wei, G.; Fan, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Wei, Z.; Huang, X.; Wei, L. Super Facile One-Step Synthesis of Sugarcane Bagasse Derived N-Doped Porous Biochar for Adsorption of Ciprofloxacin. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 335, 117566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Gao, W.; Lin, Z.; Chen, H.; Yan, S.; Zhu, H.; Zhang, H.; Sun, H.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, S.; Wu, Y. Roles of Graphitization Degree and Surface Functional Groups of N-Doped Activated Biochar for Phenol Adsorption. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2022, 167, 105700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Khan, N.; Chowdhary, P.; Gnansounou, E.; Chaturvedi, P. Biochar and Environmental Sustainability: Emerging Trends and Techno-Economic Perspectives. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 332, 125102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Prasad Yadav, T.; Manohar Yadav, R.; Pratap Singh, D. Mechanical Milling: A Top Down Approach for the Synthesis of Nanomaterials and Nanocomposites. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2012, 2, 22–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Harindintwali, J.D.; He, C.; Xiang, L.; Dou, Q.; Liu, Y.; Wang, M.; Wen, X.; Fu, Y.; Islam, M.U.; Chang, S.X.; et al. Effects of Ball Milling on Biochar Adsorption of Contaminants in Water: A Meta-Analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 882, 163643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Li, R.; Wang, J.J.; Gaston, L.A.; Zhou, B.; Li, M.; Xiao, R.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Huang, H.; Liang, W.; et al. An Overview of Carbothermal Synthesis of Metal–Biochar Composites for the Removal of Oxyanion Contaminants from Aqueous Solution. Carbon 2018, 129, 674–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Yang, H.; Yu, H.; Wang, J.; Ning, T.; Chen, P.; Yu, J.; Di, S.; Zhu, S. Magnetic Porous Biochar as a Renewable and Highly Effective Adsorbent for the Removal of Tetracycline Hydrochloride in Water. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 61513–61525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Yi, Y.; Huang, Z.; Lu, B.; Xian, J.; Tsang, E.P.; Cheng, W.; Fang, J.; Fang, Z. Magnetic Biochar for Environmental Remediation: A Review. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 298, 122468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Ding, J.; Li, X.; Shan, Y.; Yu, S.; Yu, W.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, W.; Li, X.; Liu, M.; Ding, Y. Super Facile One-Step Synthesis of Aromatic Amine Waste Residue Derived N-Rich Porous Carbon for Hyper Efficient p-Nitrophenol Adsorption. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Fontmorin, J.M.; Burgos Castillo, R.C.; Tang, W.Z.; Sillanpää, M. Stability of 5,5-Dimethyl-1-Pyrroline-N-Oxide as a Spin-Trap for Quantification of Hydroxyl Radicals in Processes Based on Fenton Reaction. Water Res. 2016, 99, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Zhang, Y.; Xu, M.; Liang, S.; Feng, Z.; Zhao, J. Mechanism of Persulfate Activation by Biochar for the Catalytic Degradation of Antibiotics: Synergistic Effects of Environmentally Persistent Free Radicals and the Defective Structure of Biochar. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 794, 148707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Zou, J.; Yu, J.; Tang, L.; Ren, X.; Pang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Xie, Q.; Liu, Y.; Liu, H.; Luo, T. Analysis of Reaction Pathways and Catalytic Sites on Metal-Free Porous Biochar for Persulfate Activation Process. Chemosphere 2020, 261, 127747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Li, M.; Li, D.; Li, S.; Liu, J.; Deng, H.; Xia, D. Novel Sludge-Sugarcane Bagasse Mixed Biochar as an Efficient Activator for Peroxymonosulfate to Degrade Bisphenol AF. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 462, 142114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Wang, J.; Shen, M.; Wang, H.; Du, Y.; Zhou, X.; Liao, Z.; Wang, H.; Chen, Z. Red Mud Modified Sludge Biochar for the Activation of Peroxymonosulfate: Singlet Oxygen Dominated Mechanism and Toxicity Prediction. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 740, 140388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Hu, Y.; Chen, D.; Zhang, R.; Ding, Y.; Ren, Z.; Fu, M.; Cao, X.; Zeng, G. Singlet Oxygen-Dominated Activation of Peroxymonosulfate by Passion Fruit Shell Derived Biochar for Catalytic Degradation of Tetracycline through a Non-Radical Oxidation Pathway. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 419, 126495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Liu, X.; Zhou, J.; Liu, D. Plasma Regulates Active Sites on Biochar to Boost Peroxomonosulfate Activation for Phenol Degradation. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 107833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Huang, H.; Guo, T.; Wang, K.; Li, Y.; Zhang, G. Efficient Activation of Persulfate by a Magnetic Recyclable Rape Straw Biochar Catalyst for the Degradation of Tetracycline Hydrochloride in Water. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 758, 143957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Li, W.; Liu, B.; Wang, Z.; Wang, K.; Lan, Y.; Zhou, L. Efficient Activation of Peroxydisulfate (PDS) by Rice Straw Biochar Modified by Copper Oxide (RSBC-CuO) for the Degradation of Phenacetin (PNT). Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 395, 125094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Cui, X.; Zhang, S.-S.; Geng, Y.; Zhen, J.; Zhan, J.; Cao, C.; Ni, S.-Q. Synergistic Catalysis by Fe3O4-Biochar/Peroxymonosulfate System for the Removal of Bisphenol a. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 276, 119351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Fu, H.; Zhao, P.; Xu, S.; Cheng, G.; Li, Z.; Li, Y.; Li, K.; Ma, S. Fabrication of Fe3O4 and Graphitized Porous Biochar Composites for Activating Peroxymonosulfate to Degrade P-Hydroxybenzoic Acid: Insights on the Mechanism. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 375, 121980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Qin, Y.; Li, X.; Wang, L.; Luo, J.; Li, Y.; Yao, C.; Xiao, Z.; Zhai, S.; An, Q. Valuable Cobalt/Biochar with Enriched Surface Oxygen-Containing Groups Prepared from Bio-Waste Shrimp Shell for Efficient Peroxymonosulfate Activation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 281, 119901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Luo, J.; Bo, S.; Qin, Y.; An, Q.; Xiao, Z.; Zhai, S. Transforming Goat Manure into Surface-Loaded Cobalt/Biochar as PMS Activator for Highly Efficient Ciprofloxacin Degradation. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 395, 125063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Song, J.; Zhao, C.; Cao, X.; Cheng, W. Enhanced Catalytic Degradation of Antibiotics by Peanut Shell-Derived Biochar-Co3O4 Activated Peroxymonosulfate: An Experimental and Mechanistic Study. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2023, 171, 423–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Yang, S.; Zhang, S.; Xu, Q.; Liu, J.; Zhong, C.; Xie, Z.; Zhao, Y. Efficient Activation of Persulfate by Nickel-Supported Cherry Core Biochar Composite for Removal of Bisphenol A. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 324, 116305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Xu, S.; Wen, L.; Yu, C.; Li, S.; Tang, J. Activation of Peroxymonosulfate by MnFe2O4@BC Composite for Bisphenol A Degradation: The Coexisting of Free-Radical and Non-Radical Pathways. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 442, 136250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Sun, Z.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Xia, S. MgFe2O4/MgO Modified Biochar with Oxygen Vacancy and Surface Hydroxyl Groups for Enhanced Peroxymonosulfate Activation to Remove Sulfamethoxazole through Singlet Oxygen-Dominated Nonradical Oxidation Process. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 477, 146960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Liu, Z.; Shi, X.; Yan, Z.; Sun, Z. Activation of Peroxymonosulfate by Biochar In-Situ Enriched with Cobalt Tungstate and Cobalt: Insights into the Role of Rich Oxygen Vacancies and Catalytic Mechanism. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 475, 146124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Li, S.; Liu, Y.; Zheng, H.; Niu, J.; Leong, Y.K.; Lee, D.-J.; Chang, J.-S. Biochar Loaded with CoFe2O4 Enhances the Formation of High-Valent Fe (IV) and Co (IV) and Oxygen Vacancy in the Peracetic Acid Activation System for Enhanced Antibiotic Degradation. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 387, 129536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. He, J.; Tang, J.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, L.; Liu, Q.; Liu, X. Magnetic Ball-Milled FeS@biochar as Persulfate Activator for Degradation of Tetracycline. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 404, 126997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Ye, S.; Zeng, G.; Tan, X.; Wu, H.; Liang, J.; Song, B.; Tang, N.; Zhang, P.; Yang, Y.; Chen, Q.; et al. Nitrogen-Doped Biochar Fiber with Graphitization from Boehmeria Nivea for Promoted Peroxymonosulfate Activation and Non-Radical Degradation Pathways with Enhancing Electron Transfer. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2020, 269, 118850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Zhong, J.; Feng, Y.; Yang, B.; Xiong, Q.; Ying, G.-G. Accelerated Degradation of Sulfadiazine by Nitrogen-Doped Magnetic Biochar-Activated Persulfate: Role of Oxygen Vacancy. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 289, 120735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Wang, R.-Z.; Huang, D.-L.; Liu, Y.-G.; Zhang, C.; Lai, C.; Wang, X.; Zeng, G.-M.; Gong, X.-M.; Duan, A.; Zhang, Q.; et al. Recent Advances in Biochar-Based Catalysts: Properties, Applications and Mechanisms for Pollution Remediation. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 371, 380–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Fang, G.; Gao, J.; Liu, C.; Dionysiou, D.D.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, D. Key Role of Persistent Free Radicals in Hydrogen Peroxide Activation by Biochar: Implications to Organic Contaminant Degradation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 1902–1910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Zhang, Y.; Yin, M.; Sun, X.; Zhao, J. Implication for Adsorption and Degradation of Dyes by Humic Acid: Light Driven of Environmentally Persistent Free Radicals to Activate Reactive Oxygen Species. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 307, 123183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Zhang, W.; Yan, L.; Wang, Q.; Li, X.; Guo, Y.; Song, W.; Li, Y. Ball Milling Boosted the Activation of Peroxymonosulfate by Biochar for Tetracycline Removal. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 106870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Lyu, H.; Tang, J.; Cui, M.; Gao, B.; Shen, B. Biochar/Iron (BC/Fe) Composites for Soil and Groundwater Remediation: Synthesis, Applications, and Mechanisms. Chemosphere 2020, 246, 125609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Liu, M.; Ye, Y.; Xu, L.; Gao, T.; Zhong, A.; Song, Z. Recent Advances in Nanoscale Zero-Valent Iron (nZVI)-Based Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs): Applications, Mechanisms, and Future Prospects. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 2830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Chen, A.; Wang, H.; Zhan, X.; Gong, K.; Xie, W.; Liang, W.; Zhang, W.; Peng, C. Applications and Synergistic Degradation Mechanisms of nZVI-Modified Biochar for the Remediation of Organic Polluted Soil and Water: A Review. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 911, 168548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Zhu, F.; Wu, Y.; Liang, Y.; Li, H.; Liang, W. Degradation Mechanism of Norfloxacin in Water Using Persulfate Activated by BC@nZVI/Ni. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 389, 124276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Zhao, Y.; Yu, L.; Song, C.; Chen, Z.; Meng, F.; Song, M. Selective Degradation of Electron-Rich Organic Pollutants Induced by CuO@Biochar: The Key Role of Outer-Sphere Interaction and Singlet Oxygen. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022, 56, 10710–10720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Li, Z.; Liu, D.; Huang, W.; Wei, X.; Huang, W. Biochar Supported CuO Composites Used as an Efficient Peroxymonosulfate Activator for Highly Saline Organic Wastewater Treatment. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 721, 137764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Zhang, Q.; He, D.; Li, X.; Feng, W.; Lyu, C.; Zhang, Y. Mechanism and Performance of Singlet Oxygen Dominated Peroxymonosulfate Activation on CoOOH Nanoparticles for 2,4-Dichlorophenol Degradation in Water. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 384, 121350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Jing, J.; Pervez, M.N.; Sun, P.; Cao, C.; Li, B.; Naddeo, V.; Jin, W.; Zhao, Y. Highly Efficient Removal of Bisphenol A by a Novel Co-Doped LaFeO3 Perovskite/PMS System in Salinity Water. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 801, 149490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Zhang, J.; Zhao, W.; Wu, S.; Yin, R.; Zhu, M. Surface Dual Redox Cycles of Mn (III)/Mn (IV) and Cu(I)/Cu(II) for Heterogeneous Peroxymonosulfate Activation to Degrade Diclofenac: Performance, Mechanism and Toxicity Assessment. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 410, 124623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. He, X.; Zheng, N.; Hu, R.; Hu, Z.; Yu, J.C. Hydrothermal and Pyrolytic Conversion of Biomasses into Catalysts for Advanced Oxidation Treatments. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2021, 31, 2006505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Chen, L.; Zuo, X.; Zhou, L.; Huang, Y.; Yang, S.; Cai, T.; Ding, D. Efficient Heterogeneous Activation of Peroxymonosulfate by Facilely Prepared Co/Fe Bimetallic Oxides: Kinetics and Mechanism. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 345, 364–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Chen, L.; Yang, S.; Zuo, X.; Huang, Y.; Cai, T.; Ding, D. Biochar Modification Significantly Promotes the Activity of Co3O4 towards Heterogeneous Activation of Peroxymonosulfate. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 354, 856–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Feng, Z.; Zhou, B.; Yuan, R.; Li, H.; He, P.; Wang, F.; Chen, Z.; Chen, H. Biochar Derived from Different Crop Straws as Persulfate Activator for the Degradation of Sulfadiazine: Influence of Biomass Types and Systemic Cause Analysis. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 440, 135669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Liang, H.; Sun, H.; Patel, A.; Shukla, P.; Zhu, Z.H.; Wang, S. Excellent Performance of Mesoporous Co3O4/MnO2 Nanoparticles in Heterogeneous Activation of Peroxymonosulfate for Phenol Degradation in Aqueous Solutions. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2012, 127, 330–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. He, L.; Lv, L.; Pillai, S.C.; Wang, H.; Xue, J.; Ma, Y.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wu, L.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Efficient Degradation of Diclofenac Sodium by Periodate Activation Using Fe/Cu Bimetallic Modified Sewage Sludge Biochar/UV System. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 783, 146974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Zhang, B.; Mei, M.; Li, K.; Liu, J.; Wang, T.; Chen, S.; Li, J. One-Pot Synthesis of MnFe2O4 Functionalized Magnetic Biochar by the Sol-Gel Pyrolysis Method for Diclofenac Sodium Removal. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 381, 135210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Zhao, Y.; Song, M.; Cao, Q.; Sun, P.; Chen, Y.; Meng, F. The Superoxide Radicals’ Production via Persulfate Activated with CuFe2O4@Biochar Composites to Promote the Redox Pairs Cycling for Efficient Degradation of o-Nitrochlorobenzene in Soil. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 400, 122887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Wang, L.; Lu, X.; Chen, G.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, S. Synergy between MgFe2O4 and Biochar Derived from Banana Pseudo-Stem Promotes Persulfate Activation for Efficient Tetracycline Degradation. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 468, 143773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Yang, S.; Li, L.; Xiao, T.; Zhang, Y.; Zheng, D. Promoting Effect of Ammonia Modification on Activated Carbon Catalyzed Peroxymonosulfate Oxidation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2016, 160, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Chen, G.; Sun, M.; Wei, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, B.; Du, B. Ag3PO4/Graphene-Oxide Composite with Remarkably Enhanced Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalytic Activity toward Dyes in Water. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 244–245, 86–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Kim, J.R.; Kan, E. Heterogeneous Photocatalytic Degradation of Sulfamethoxazole in Water Using a Biochar-Supported TiO2 Photocatalyst. J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 180, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Feng, X.; Li, X.; Su, B.; Ma, J. Solid-Phase Fabrication of TiO2/Chitosan-Biochar Composites with Superior UV–Vis Light Driven Photocatalytic Degradation Performance. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2022, 648, 129114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Lu, L.; Shan, R.; Shi, Y.; Wang, S.; Yuan, H. A Novel TiO2/Biochar Composite Catalysts for Photocatalytic Degradation of Methyl Orange. Chemosphere 2019, 222, 391–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Xiong, Z.; Chen, H.; Lu, L.; Shan, R.; Zhang, Y.; Yuan, H.; Chen, Y. Nitrogen-Doped TiO2/Nitrogen-Containing Biochar Composite Catalyst as a Photocatalytic Material for the Decontamination of Aqueous Organic Pollutants. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 791–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Xiao, Y.; Lyu, H.; Yang, C.; Zhao, B.; Wang, L.; Tang, J. Graphitic Carbon Nitride/Biochar Composite Synthesized by a Facile Ball-Milling Method for the Adsorption and Photocatalytic Degradation of Enrofloxacin. J. Environ. Sci. 2021, 103, 93–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Xiao, L.; Zhang, S.; Chen, B.; Wu, P.; Feng, N.; Deng, F.; Wang, Z. Visible-Light Photocatalysis Degradation of Enrofloxacin by Crawfish Shell Biochar Combined with g-C3N4: Effects and Mechanisms. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 109693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Tang, R.; Gong, D.; Deng, Y.; Xiong, S.; Zheng, J.; Li, L.; Zhou, Z.; Su, L.; Zhao, J. π-π Stacking Derived from Graphene-like Biochar/g-C3N4 with Tunable Band Structure for Photocatalytic Antibiotics Degradation via Peroxymonosulfate Activation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 423, 126944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Li, F.; Lin, M. Synthesis of Biochar-Supported K-Doped g-C3N4 Photocatalyst for Enhancing the Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Degradation Activity. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Xu, H.; Zhang, T.; Wang, D.; Cai, D.; Chen, S.; Wang, H.; Shu, S.; Zhu, Y. Degradation of Tetracycline Using Persulfate Activated by a Honeycomb Structured S-Doped g-C3N4/Biochar under Visible Light. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 300, 121833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Gholami, P.; Khataee, A.; Soltani, R.D.C.; Dinpazhoh, L.; Bhatnagar, A. Photocatalytic Degradation of Gemifloxacin Antibiotic Using Zn-Co-LDH@biochar Nanocomposite. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 382, 121070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Ye, S.; Yan, M.; Tan, X.; Liang, J.; Zeng, G.; Wu, H.; Song, B.; Zhou, C.; Yang, Y.; Wang, H. Facile Assembled Biochar-Based Nanocomposite with Improved Graphitization for Efficient Photocatalytic Activity Driven by Visible Light. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 250, 78–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Yang, Q.; Li, X.; Tian, Q.; Pan, A.; Liu, X.; Yin, H.; Shi, Y.; Fang, G. Synergistic Effect of Adsorption and Photocatalysis of BiOBr/Lignin-Biochar Composites with Oxygen Vacancies under Visible Light Irradiation. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2023, 117, 117–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Luo, Y.; Zheng, A.; Li, J.; Han, Y.; Xue, M.; Zhang, L.; Yin, Z.; Xie, C.; Chen, Z.; Ji, L.; et al. Integrated Adsorption and Photodegradation of Tetracycline by Bismuth Oxycarbonate/Biochar Nanocomposites. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 457, 141228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Fang, G.; Liu, C.; Wang, Y.; Dionysiou, D.D.; Zhou, D. Photogeneration of Reactive Oxygen Species from Biochar Suspension for Diethyl Phthalate Degradation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 214, 34–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Wan, D.; Wang, J.; Dionysiou, D.D.; Kong, Y.; Yao, W.; Selvinsimpson, S.; Chen, Y. Photogeneration of Reactive Species from Biochar-Derived Dissolved Black Carbon for the Degradation of Amine and Phenolic Pollutants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 8866–8876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Navidpour, A.H.; Abbasi, S.; Li, D.; Mojiri, A.; Zhou, J.L. Investigation of Advanced Oxidation Process in the Presence of TiO2 Semiconductor as Photocatalyst: Property, Principle, Kinetic Analysis, and Photocatalytic Activity. Catalysts 2023, 13, 232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Zhang, Y.; Chen, J.; Hua, L.; Li, S.; Zhang, X.; Sheng, W.; Cao, S. High Photocatalytic Activity of Hierarchical SiO2@C-Doped TiO2 Hollow Spheres in UV and Visible Light towards Degradation of Rhodamine B. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 340, 309–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Zhang, R.; Ma, Y.; Lan, W.; Sameen, D.E.; Ahmed, S.; Dai, J.; Qin, W.; Li, S.; Liu, Y. Enhanced Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Dyes by Ultrasonic-Assisted Electrospray TiO2/Graphene Oxide on Polyacrylonitrile/β-Cyclodextrin Nanofibrous Membranes. Ultrason. Sonochemistry 2021, 70, 105343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Xiao, F.; Guo, X.; Li, J.; Sun, H.; Zhang, H.; Wang, W. Electrospinning Preparation and Dye Adsorption Capacity of TiO2@Carbon Flexible Fiber. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 11856–11860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Mancuso, A.; Kiani, A.; Sacco, O.; Lettieri, M.; Fittipaldi, R.; Vaiano, V.; Acocella, M.R.; Venditto, V. Ball–Milled TiO2/Biochar Hybrid System as a Heterogeneous Photocatalyst for Tannery Dyes Removal in Aqueous Solution. J. Mol. Liq. 2024, 399, 124357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Tang, R.; Xiong, S.; Gong, D.; Deng, Y.; Wang, Y.; Su, L.; Ding, C.; Yang, L.; Liao, C. Ti3C2 2D MXene: Recent Progress and Perspectives in Photocatalysis. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 56663–56680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Wang, L.; Xie, L.; Zhao, W.; Liu, S.; Zhao, Q. Oxygen-Facilitated Dynamic Active-Site Generation on Strained MoS2 during Photo-Catalytic Hydrogen Evolution. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 405, 127028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Jin, C.; Kang, J.; Li, Z.; Wang, M.; Wu, Z.; Xie, Y. Enhanced Visible Light Photocatalytic Degradation of Tetracycline by MoS2/Ag/g-C3N4 Z-Scheme Composites with Peroxymonosulfate. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 514, 146076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Deng, Y.; Feng, C.; Tang, L.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, Z.; Feng, H.; Wang, J.; Yu, J.; Liu, Y. Ultrathin Low Dimensional Heterostructure Composites with Superior Photocatalytic Activity: Insight into the Multichannel Charge Transfer Mechanism. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 393, 124718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Wang, F.; Xu, J.; Wang, Z.; Lou, Y.; Pan, C.; Zhu, Y. Unprecedentedly Efficient Mineralization Performance of Photocatalysis-Self-Fenton System towards Organic Pollutants over Oxygen-Doped Porous g-C3N4 Nanosheets. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2022, 312, 121438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Sun, J.; Lin, X.; Xie, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Q.; Ying, Z. Facile Synthesis of Novel Ternary G-C3N4/Ferrite/Biochar Hybrid Photocatalyst for Efficient Degradation of Methylene Blue under Visible-Light Irradiation. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2020, 606, 125556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Wang, T.; Zheng, J.; Cai, J.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, X. Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalytic Degradation of Dye and Antibiotics by Activated Biochar Composited with K+ Doped g-C3N4: Effects, Mechanisms, Actual Wastewater Treatment and Disinfection. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 839, 155955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Zhang, H.; Yu, Y.; Li, Y.; Lin, L.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, W.; Wang, L.; Niu, L. A Novel BC/g-C3N4 Porous Hydrogel Carrier Used in Intimately Coupled Photocatalysis and Biodegradation System for Efficient Removal of Tetracycline Hydrochloride in Water. Chemosphere 2023, 317, 137888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Oh, W.-D.; Dong, Z.; Lim, T.-T. Generation of Sulfate Radical through Heterogeneous Catalysis for Organic Contaminants Removal: Current Development, Challenges and Prospects. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016, 194, 169–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Sun, J.; Zhang, B.; Chen, W.; Tao, Z.; Liu, J.; Wang, L. Biochar Doped Carbon Nitride to Enhance the Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution through Synergy of Nitrogen Vacancies and Bridging Carbon Structure: Nanoarchitectonics and First-Principles Calculation. Carbon 2023, 209, 117988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Wang, T.; Dissanayake, P.D.; Sun, M.; Tao, Z.; Han, W.; An, N.; Gu, Q.; Xia, D.; Tian, B.; Ok, Y.S.; et al. Adsorption and Visible-Light Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Pollutants by Functionalized Biochar: Role of Iodine Doping and Reactive Species. Environ. Res. 2021, 197, 111026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Hosny, M.; Fawzy, M.; Eltaweil, A.S. Green Synthesis of Bimetallic Ag/ZnO@Biohar Nanocomposite for Photocatalytic Degradation of Tetracycline, Antibacterial and Antioxidant Activities. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 7316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Khataee, A.; Kayan, B.; Gholami, P.; Kalderis, D.; Akay, S.; Dinpazhoh, L. Sonocatalytic Degradation of Reactive Yellow 39 Using Synthesized ZrO2 Nanoparticles on Biochar. Ultrason. Sonochemistry 2017, 39, 540–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Kim, J.; Park, B.; Son, Y.; Khim, J. Peat Moss-Derived Biochar for Sonocatalytic Applications. Ultrason. Sonochemistry 2018, 42, 26–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Nikolaou, S.; Vakros, J.; Diamadopoulos, E.; Mantzavinos, D. Sonochemical Degradation of Propylparaben in the Presence of Agro-Industrial Biochar. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 104010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Wang, J.; Li, W.; Zhao, Z.; Musoke, F.S.N.; Wu, X. Ultrasonic Activated Biochar and Its Removal of Harmful Substances in Environment. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Pang, Y.L.; Lim, S.; Lee, R.K.L. Enhancement of Sonocatalytic Degradation of Organic Dye by Using Titanium Dioxide (TiO2)/Activated Carbon (AC) Derived from Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 34638–34652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Afzal, M.Z.; Zu, P.; Zhang, C.-M.; Guan, J.; Song, C.; Sun, X.-F.; Wang, S.-G. Sonocatalytic Degradation of Ciprofloxacin Using Hydrogel Beads of TiO2 Incorporated Biochar and Chitosan. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 434, 128879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Gholami, P.; Dinpazhoh, L.; Khataee, A.; Hassani, A.; Bhatnagar, A. Facile Hydrothermal Synthesis of Novel Fe-Cu Layered Double Hydroxide/Biochar Nanocomposite with Enhanced Sonocatalytic Activity for Degradation of Cefazolin Sodium. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 381, 120742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Gholami, P.; Dinpazhoh, L.; Khataee, A.; Orooji, Y. Sonocatalytic Activity of Biochar-Supported ZnO Nanorods in Degradation of Gemifloxacin: Synergy Study, Effect of Parameters and Phytotoxicity Evaluation. Ultrason. Sonochemistry 2019, 55, 44–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Jun, B.-M.; Kim, Y.; Yoon, Y.; Yea, Y.; Park, C.M. Enhanced Sonocatalytic Degradation of Recalcitrant Organic Contaminants Using a Magnetically Recoverable Ag/Fe-Loaded Activated Biochar Composite. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 22521–22531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Li, G.; Zhang, S.; Yu, P.; Mi, X.; Guo, Y.; Shen, C. Effect of Hexadecyl Trimethyl Ammonium Bromide on Sonocatalytic Degradation of Orange II by Using Bagasse Biochar. Desalin. Water Treat. 2023, 313, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Zhou, J.; Hou, W.; Qi, P.; Gao, X.; Luo, Z.; Cen, K. CeO2–TiO2 Sorbents for the Removal of Elemental Mercury from Syngas. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 10056–10062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Khataee, A.; Gholami, P.; Kalderis, D.; Pachatouridou, E.; Konsolakis, M. Preparation of Novel CeO2-Biochar Nanocomposite for Sonocatalytic Degradation of a Textile Dye. Ultrason. Sonochemistry 2018, 41, 503–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Khataee, A.; Kayan, B.; Gholami, P.; Kalderis, D.; Akay, S. Sonocatalytic Degradation of an Anthraquinone Dye Using TiO2-Biochar Nanocomposite. Ultrason. Sonochemistry 2017, 39, 120–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Bensalah, N.; Midassi, S.; Ahmad, M.I.; Bedoui, A. Degradation of Hydroxychloroquine by Electrochemical Advanced Oxidation Processes. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 402, 126279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Wang, J.; Li, C.; Rauf, M.; Luo, H.; Sun, X.; Jiang, Y. Gas Diffusion Electrodes for H2O2 Production and Their Applications for Electrochemical Degradation of Organic Pollutants in Water: A Review. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 759, 143459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Zhang, J.; Wang, Y.; Liu, S.; Pan, Q.; Song, Z.; Chen, G.; Zhao, C. Enhanced Degradation of Carbamazepine by Electrochemical Activation of Peroxymonosulfate with PTFE/Black Carbon as Cathode. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 109920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Mirehbar, K.; Sánchez, J.S.; Pinilla, S.; Oropeza, F.E.; Sirés, I.; de la Peña O’Shea, V.A.; Palma, J.; Lado, J.J. Development of a 3D Ni-Mn Binary Oxide Anode for Energy-Efficient Electro-Oxidation of Organic Pollutants. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2024, 12, 112562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Stanković, D.M.; Kukuruzar, A.; Savić, S.; Ognjanović, M.; Janković-Častvan, I.M.; Roglić, G.; Antić, B.; Manojlović, D.; Dojčinović, B. Sponge-like Europium Oxide from Hollow Carbon Sphere as a Template for an Anode Material for Reactive Blue 52 Electrochemical Degradation. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2021, 273, 125154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Qiu, F.; Wang, L.; Fan, Y.; Pan, Y.; Song, H.; Ye, Z.; Zhang, S. Review on Structural Adjustment Strategies of Titanium-Based Metal Oxide Dimensionally Stable Anodes in Electrochemical Advanced Oxidation Technology. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2024, 26, 2400122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Wu, Q.; Gao, Q.; Sun, L.; Guo, H.; Tai, X.; Li, D.; Liu, L.; Ling, C.; Sun, X. Facilitating Active Species by Decorating CeO2 on Ni3S2 Nanosheets for Efficient Water Oxidation Electrocatalysis. Chin. J. Catal. 2021, 42, 482–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Yu, F.; Tao, L.; Yang, Y.; Wang, S. Electrochemical Catalytic Mechanism of N-Doped Electrode for in-Situ Generation of OH in Metal-Free EAOPs to Degrade Organic Pollutants. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 277, 119432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Yang, W.; Zhou, M.; Liang, L. Highly Efficient In-Situ Metal-Free Electrochemical Advanced Oxidation Process Using Graphite Felt Modified with N-Doped Graphene. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 338, 700–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Zhang, H.; Chen, S.; Zhang, N.; Chen, H.; Yang, Y.; Tu, Y.; Jiao, C.; Xu, Z.; Xia, Y.; Suo, H.; et al. Sewage Sludge-Derived Catalyst for Extremely Efficient Electrocatalytic Elimination of Organic Pollutants in Water. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 469, 143777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Liu, Y.; Yu, X.; Kamali, M.; Zhang, X.; Feijoo, S.; Al-Salem, S.M.; Dewil, R.; Appels, L. Biochar in Hydroxyl Radical-Based Electrochemical Advanced Oxidation Processes (eAOPs)—Mechanisms and Prospects. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 467, 143291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Zhang, C.; Li, H.; Yang, X.; Tan, X.; Wan, C.; Liu, X. Characterization of Electrodes Modified with Sludge-Derived Biochar and Its Performance of Electrocatalytic Oxidation of Azo Dyes. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 324, 116445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Ma, Y.; Tang, J.; Chen, S.; Yang, L.; Shen, S.; Chen, X.; Zhang, Z. Ball Milling and Acetic Acid Co-Modified Sludge Biochar Enhanced by Electrochemistry to Activate Peroxymonosulfate for Sustainable Degradation of Environmental Concentration Neonicotinoids. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 444, 130336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Zhang, B.; Isobe, T.; Nabae, Y.; Hu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Song, M.; Wu, Y.; Chen, B.; Fujii, M. Kraft Lignin-Derived Multi-Porous Carbon toward Sustainable Electro-Fenton Treatment of Emerging Contaminants. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2024, 203, 107413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Ansari, M.N.; Sarrouf, S.; Ehsan, M.F.; Manzoor, S.; Ashiq, M.N.; Alshawabkeh, A.N. Polarity Reversal for Enhanced In-Situ Electrochemical Synthesis of H2O2 over Banana-Peel Derived Biochar Cathode for Water Remediation. Electrochim. Acta 2023, 453, 142351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Kim, J.-G.; Sarrouf, S.; Ehsan, M.F.; Baek, K.; Alshawabkeh, A.N. In-Situ Hydrogen Peroxide Formation and Persulfate Activation over Banana Peel-Derived Biochar Cathode for Electrochemical Water Treatment in a Flow Reactor. Chemosphere 2023, 331, 138849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Ge, Y.; Ke, J.; Li, X.; Wang, J.; Yang, Q.; Liu, Y.; Guo, R.; Chen, J. Electro-Activating Persulfate via Biochar Catalytic Cathode for Sulfamethazine Degradation: Performance and Mechanism Insight. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 109020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Sun, C.; Chen, T.; Huang, Q.; Duan, X.; Zhan, M.; Ji, L.; Li, X.; Wang, S.; Yan, J. Biochar Cathode: Reinforcing Electro-Fenton Pathway against Four-Electron Reduction by Controlled Carbonization and Surface Chemistry. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 754, 142136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Zhang, T.; Liu, Y.; Yang, L.; Li, W.; Wang, W.; Liu, P. Ti–Sn–Ce/Bamboo Biochar Particle Electrodes for Enhanced Electrocatalytic Treatment of Coking Wastewater in a Three-Dimensional Electrochemical Reaction System. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 258, 120273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Wang, W.; Li, W.; Li, H.; Xu, C.; Zhao, G.; Ren, Y. Kapok Fiber Derived Biochar as an Efficient Electro-Catalyst for H2O2 in-Situ Generation in an Electro-Fenton System for Sulfamethoxazole Degradation. J. Water Process Eng. 2022, 50, 103311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Zhang, T.; Sun, L.; Sun, X.; Dong, H.; Yu, H.; Yu, H. Radical and Non-Radical Cooperative Degradation in Metal-Free Electro-Fenton Based on Nitrogen Self-Doped Biochar. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 435, 129063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Yin, Z.; Zhu, J.; Wang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Yang, Z.; Yang, W. Novel Fe/N Co-Doping Biochar Based Electro-Fenton Catalytic Membrane Enabling Enhanced Tetracycline Removal and Self-Cleaning Performance. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 402, 136731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Sun, L.; Wang, C.; Ji, M.; Kong, X. Treatment of Mixed Chemical Wastewater and the Agglomeration Mechanism via an Internal Electrolysis Filter. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 215–216, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. van der Zee, F.P.; Bisschops, I.A.E.; Lettinga, G.; Field, J.A. Activated Carbon as an Electron Acceptor and Redox Mediator during the Anaerobic Biotransformation of Azo Dyes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Li, X.; Qin, Y.; Song, H.; Zou, W.; Cao, Z.; Ding, L.; Pan, Y.; Zhou, M. Efficient Removal of Bisphenol A by a Novel Biochar-Based Fe/C Granule via Persulfate Activation: Performance, Mechanism, and Toxicity Assessment. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2023, 169, 48–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Yu, F.; Guo, Y.; Li, H.; Yang, J. Activated Persulfate by the Synergistic Electro-Activation and Bimetals Cathode (MBC@CF) Leads to Highly Efficient Degradation of Tetracycline. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024, 335, 126204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Gong, K.; Du, F.; Xia, Z.; Durstock, M.; Dai, L. Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Nanotube Arrays with High Electrocatalytic Activity for Oxygen Reduction. Science 2009, 323, 760–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Singh, S.K.; Takeyasu, K.; Nakamura, J. Active Sites and Mechanism of Oxygen Reduction Reaction Electrocatalysis on Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Materials. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1804297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Ding, Y.; Zhou, W.; Gao, J.; Sun, F.; Zhao, G. H2O2 Electrogeneration from O2 Electroreduction by N-Doped Carbon Materials: A Mini-Review on Preparation Methods, Selectivity of N Sites, and Prospects. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 8, 2002091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Luo, Z.; Liu, M.; Tang, D.; Xu, Y.; Ran, H.; He, J.; Chen, K.; Sun, J. High H2O2 Selectivity and Enhanced Fe2+ Regeneration toward an Effective Electro-Fenton Process Based on a Self-Doped Porous Biochar Cathode. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2022, 315, 121523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Alsawy, T.; Rashad, E.; El-Qelish, M.; Mohammed, R.H. A Comprehensive Review on the Chemical Regeneration of Biochar Adsorbent for Sustainable Wastewater Treatment. NPJ Clean Water 2022, 5, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Jia, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Fu, J.; Yuan, L.; Li, Z.; Liu, C.; Zhao, D.; Wang, X. A Novel Magnetic Biochar/MgFe-Layered Double Hydroxides Composite Removing Pb2+ from Aqueous Solution: Isotherms, Kinetics and Thermodynamics. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2019, 567, 278–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Pan, J.; Gao, B.; Wang, S.; Guo, K.; Xu, X.; Yue, Q. Waste-to-Resources: Green Preparation of Magnetic Biogas Residues-Based Biochar for Effective Heavy Metal Removals. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 737, 140283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Sayin, F.; Akar, S.T.; Akar, T. From Green Biowaste to Water Treatment Applications: Utilization of Modified New Biochar for the Efficient Removal of Ciprofloxacin. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2021, 24, 100522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Vigneshwaran, S.; Sirajudheen, P.; Karthikeyan, P.; Meenakshi, S. Fabrication of Sulfur-Doped Biochar Derived from Tapioca Peel Waste with Superior Adsorption Performance for the Removal of Malachite Green and Rhodamine B Dyes. Surf. Interfaces 2021, 23, 100920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Gao, L.; Li, Z.; Yi, W.; Li, Y.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, A.; Wang, L. Impacts of Pyrolysis Temperature on Lead Adsorption by Cotton Stalk-Derived Biochar and Related Mechanisms. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Aktaş, Ö.; Çeçen, F. Bioregeneration of Activated Carbon: A Review. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2007, 59, 257–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. El Gamal, M.; Mousa, H.A.; El-Naas, M.H.; Zacharia, R.; Judd, S. Bio-Regeneration of Activated Carbon: A Comprehensive Review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2018, 197, 345–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Ng, S.L.; Seng, C.E.; Lim, P.E. Quantification of Bioregeneration of Activated Carbon and Activated Rice Husk Loaded with Phenolic Compounds. Chemosphere 2009, 75, 1392–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  233. Guo, Y.; Du, E. The Effects of Thermal Regeneration Conditions and Inorganic Compounds on the Characteristics of Activated Carbon Used in Power Plant. Energy Procedia 2012, 17, 444–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Foo, K.Y.; Hameed, B.H. A Rapid Regeneration of Methylene Blue Dye-Loaded Activated Carbons with Microwave Heating. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2012, 98, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Scamehorn, J.F. Removal of Vinyl Chloride from Gaseous Streams by Adsorption on Activated Carbon. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 1979, 18, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Radic, D.B.; Stanojevic, M.M.; Obradovic, M.O.; Jovovic, A.M. Thermal Analysis of Physical and Chemical Changes Occuring During Regeneration of Activated Carbon. Therm. Sci. 2017, 21, 1067–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Deng, J.; Fang, Y.; Hou, C.; Zhang, Y.; Li, M.; Han, J.; Du, W.; Tang, C.; Hu, X. Ultrasonic Assisted Activation of Persulfate for the Treatment of Spent Porous Biochar: Degradation of Adsorbed PFOA and Adsorbent Regeneration. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 111146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Fan, Q.; Cui, L.; Quan, G.; Wang, S.; Sun, J.; Han, X.; Wang, J.; Yan, J. Effects of Wet Oxidation Process on Biochar Surface in Acid and Alkaline Soil Environments. Materials 2018, 11, 2362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. James, A.L.; Perkins, W.T.; Sian, J.; Hammond, D.; Hodgson, E.M. Application of Biochar for Minewater Remediation: Effect of Scaling up Production on Performance under Laboratory and Field Conditions. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 359, 127439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Inyang, M.; Dickenson, E.R.V. The Use of Carbon Adsorbents for the Removal of Perfluoroalkyl Acids from Potable Reuse Systems. Chemosphere 2017, 184, 168–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Lakshmi, D.; Akhil, D.; Kartik, A.; Gopinath, K.P.; Arun, J.; Bhatnagar, A.; Rinklebe, J.; Kim, W.; Muthusamy, G. Artificial Intelligence (AI) Applications in Adsorption of Heavy Metals Using Modified Biochar. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 801, 149623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Bhagat, S.K.; Tung, T.M.; Yaseen, Z.M. Development of Artificial Intelligence for Modeling Wastewater Heavy Metal Removal: State of the Art, Application Assessment and Possible Future Research. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 250, 119473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Zhu, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, X. Machine Learning Prediction of Biochar Yield and Carbon Contents in Biochar Based on Biomass Characteristics and Pyrolysis Conditions. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 288, 121527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Jaffari, Z.H.; Jeong, H.; Shin, J.; Kwak, J.; Son, C.; Lee, Y.-G.; Kim, S.; Chon, K.; Hwa Cho, K. Machine-Learning-Based Prediction and Optimization of Emerging Contaminants’ Adsorption Capacity on Biochar Materials. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 466, 143073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Biomass classification. (b) Cellulose, (c) hemicellulose, (d) lignin, and (e) ash mass ratios for different types of biomass, and (f) average elemental mass ratios for both types of biomass. (Data from the Phyllis2 database).
Figure 1. (a) Biomass classification. (b) Cellulose, (c) hemicellulose, (d) lignin, and (e) ash mass ratios for different types of biomass, and (f) average elemental mass ratios for both types of biomass. (Data from the Phyllis2 database).
Nanomaterials 14 01933 g001
Figure 2. Mechanisms responsible for adsorption of enrofloxacin on BCs. (Reproduced from [86]).
Figure 2. Mechanisms responsible for adsorption of enrofloxacin on BCs. (Reproduced from [86]).
Nanomaterials 14 01933 g002
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of adsorption mechanism for RR120 on 50%-BiOCl/BC. (Reproduced from [89]).
Figure 3. Schematic diagram of adsorption mechanism for RR120 on 50%-BiOCl/BC. (Reproduced from [89]).
Nanomaterials 14 01933 g003
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of the mechanism of OFGs activating PMS to produce single linear oxygen to degrade pollutants. (Reproduced from [106]).
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of the mechanism of OFGs activating PMS to produce single linear oxygen to degrade pollutants. (Reproduced from [106]).
Nanomaterials 14 01933 g004
Figure 5. Proposed mechanism for the degradation of phenol. (Reprinted from [28]).
Figure 5. Proposed mechanism for the degradation of phenol. (Reprinted from [28]).
Nanomaterials 14 01933 g005
Figure 6. Schematic illustration of the catalytic degradation of MO. (Reprinted from [151]).
Figure 6. Schematic illustration of the catalytic degradation of MO. (Reprinted from [151]).
Nanomaterials 14 01933 g006
Figure 7. Schematic illustration of the possible adsorption-photocatalytic mechanisms of ACB-K-gC3N4 for pollutant degradation and disinfection under visible light irradiation. (Reprinted from [175]).
Figure 7. Schematic illustration of the possible adsorption-photocatalytic mechanisms of ACB-K-gC3N4 for pollutant degradation and disinfection under visible light irradiation. (Reprinted from [175]).
Nanomaterials 14 01933 g007
Figure 8. Possible mechanism of CIP degradation by TBCB in the sonocatalytic systems. (Reprinted from [186]).
Figure 8. Possible mechanism of CIP degradation by TBCB in the sonocatalytic systems. (Reprinted from [186]).
Nanomaterials 14 01933 g008
Figure 9. The proposed catalytic mechanism of BCCC and BCPE. (Reprinted from [210]).
Figure 9. The proposed catalytic mechanism of BCCC and BCPE. (Reprinted from [210]).
Nanomaterials 14 01933 g009
Table 1. Common synthesis methods for biochar.
Table 1. Common synthesis methods for biochar.
Synthesis MethodsPreparation ConditionRef.
Pyrolysisfast pyrolysis400–800 °C, seconds[63,64]
slow pyrolysis300–900 °C, minutes to days[65,66]
Hydrothermal carbonization 180–250 °C, 0.5–48 h[67,68,69,70]
Gasification 700–900 °C, 10–20 s[71,72,73]
Table 2. Applications of BC-based adsorbents in the degradation of wastewater pollutants.
Table 2. Applications of BC-based adsorbents in the degradation of wastewater pollutants.
BC-Based AdsorbentsTargeted PollutantsOperational ParametersQmax
(mg/g)
Dominant MechanismRef.
Phosphoric acid/cow dung BCEnrofloxacinICa = 20 mg/L; dosage = 0.32 g/L; pH = 5; t = 6 h, T = 25 °C63.61π–π interactions, pore filling, electrostatic interactions, and hydrogen bonding[86]
KMnO4+KOH modified BCTetracyclineICa = 200 mg/L; dosage = 0.25 g/L; t = 24 h; T = 318 K584.19Pore filling, π–π interactions; hydrogen bonding, and metal complexation[58]
Calcium modified BCTetracyclineICa = 20 mg/L; dosage = 1.0 g/L; pH = 8.0; t = 24 h33.53π–π interactions, and hydrogen bonding[87]
ZnO/magnetic camphor leaves BCCiprofloxacinICa = 100 mg/L; dosage = 0.5 g/L; pH = 4; t = 120 h; T = 40 °C449.4π–π interactions, electrostatic interactions, and cation exchange interactions[88]
Iron oxide/banana-peel BCMethylene blueICa = 500 mg/L; dosage = 0.5 g/L; pH = 6.1; t = 12 h; T = 40 °C862An electron transfer process driven by electrostatic attraction[19]
BiOCl/BCReactive red-120ICa = 10 mg/L; dosage = 0.4 g/L; pH = 2, t = 18 h; T = 25 °C116.38Electrostatic interactions, π–π interactions, and hydrogen bonding[89]
ZnCl2/sunflower seed husk BCTetracyclineICa = 20 mg/L; dosage = 0.025 g/L; t = 24 h; T = 25 °C673Chemical and electrostatic interactions[90]
Magnetic BC microsphereTetracyclineICa = 100 mg/L; dosage = 0.5 g/L; pH = 5; t = 24 h; T = 25 °C94.63Pore filling, electrostatic attraction, and π–π interactions[91]
Surface-imprinted magnetic BCSulfamethoxazoleICa = 1000 mg/L; dosage = 1.0 g/L; t = 4 h; T = 35 °C25.65Hydrogen bonding, electrostatic interactions, and π–π interactions[92]
Urea N-doped BCNorfloxacinICa = 50 mg/L; dosage = 1.0 g/L; pH = 5.0; t = 48 h11.48Hydrogen bonding, π–π electron donor-acceptor, and pore-filling interactions[93]
N-doped/porous BCCiprofloxacinICa = 30 mg/L; dosage = 0.125 g/L; pH = 6.58; t = 1 h; T = 30 °C212Combined filling pore, π–π conjugation, and hydrogen bonding.[94]
N-doped/poplar BCPhenolICa = 100 mg/L; dosage = 0.2 g/L; t = 48 h; T = 25 °C126.5–170.7π–π stacking interactions[95]
Hydrothermal N-doped sludge-derived BCSulfamethoxazoleICa = 15 mg/L; dosage = 0.0075 g/L; t = 12 h; T = 308 K68.6Lewis acid-base interactions, π–π conjugation, pore filling, and electrostatic interactions[7]
ICa—initial concentration.
Table 3. Applications of BC-based catalysts in Fenton-like processes for the remediation of pollutants.
Table 3. Applications of BC-based catalysts in Fenton-like processes for the remediation of pollutants.
BC-Based Catalytic SystemsTargeted PollutantsOperational ParametersReduction EfficiencyDominant RadicalsRef.
Pine BC+PMSTetracyclineICa = 20 mg/L; PMS dose = 3 mM; catalyst dosage = 3.0 g/L; pH = 7.090%SO4•− and HO[104]
Pine needle BC+PMS1,4-dioxaneICa = 20 μM; PMS dose = 8 mM; catalyst dosage = 1 g/L; pH = 6.584.2%SO4•− and HO[77]
Corn cob BC+PDS2,4-dichlorophenolICa = 100 mg/L; PDS dose = 1 g/L; catalyst dosage = 0.2 g/L; pH = 6.086%1O2[105]
Soybean residue BC+PDSTetracycline hydrochlorideICa = 50 mg/L; PDS dose = 1 mM; catalyst dosage = 0.2 g/L; pH = 784.1%1O2[59]
Sludge-sugarcane bagasse BC+PMSBisphenol AFICa = 20 mg/L; PMS dose = 50 mg/L; catalyst dosage = 0.2 g/L; pH = 793.7%1O2[106]
Red mud BC+PMSSulfamethoxazoleICa = 0.02 mM; PMS dose = 0.15 mM; catalyst dosage = 1.5 g/L; pH = 4.12100%1O2[107]
Passion fruit shell BC+PMSTetracyclineICa = 20 mg/L; PMS dose = 0.3 g/L; catalyst dosage = 0.4 g/L; pH = 5.490.9%1O2[108]
Pine need BC+PMSPhenolICa = 10 mg/L; PMS dose = 3.0 mM; catalyst dosage = 0.2 g/L; pH = 5.2100%1O2, HO and SO4•−[109]
Magnetic rape straw BC+PSTetracycline hydrochlorideICa = 20 mg/L; PMS dose = 8 mM; catalyst dosage = 1 g/L; pH = 5.6898%SO4•− and 1O2[110]
CuO/Rice straw BC+PDSPhenacetinICa = 10 mg/L; PDS dose = 50 mg/L; catalyst dosage = 0.3 g/L; pH = 4.26100%1O2 and O2•−[111]
nano Fe3O4/Leaves BC+PMSBisphenol aICa = 20 mg/L; PMS dose = 5 mM; catalyst dosage = 2 g/L; pH = 3100%SO4•− [112]
Fe3O4/Porous BC+PMSP-hydroxybenzoic acidICa = 10 mg/L; PMS dose = 1 g/L; catalyst dosage = 0.2 g/L; pH = 8.5100%SO4•− [113]
Co-doped/Shrimp shell BC+PMS CiprofloxacinICa = 30 mg/L; PMS dose = 0.4 g/L; catalyst dosage = 0.15 g/L; pH = 6.889.5%SO4•− and O2•−[114]
Co-doped/Goat manure BC+PMSCiprofloxacinICa = 20 mg/L; PMS dose = 0.4 g/L; catalyst dosage = 0.1 g/L; pH = 6.396.5%SO4•−, HO and O2•−[115]
Co3O4/Peanut shell BC+PMSOfloxacinICa = 20 mg/L; PMS dose = 1 mM; catalyst dosage = 0.8 g/L; pH = 797.3%1O2 and SO4•−[116]
Ni-doped/Cherry core BC+PMSBisphenol-AICa = 20 mg/L; PMS dose = 1 g/L; catalyst dosage = 0.03 g/L; pH = 3100%SO4•−, HO and 1O2[117]
Fe/Mn-doped/Sludge BC+PMSPhenolICa = 0.32 mM; PMS dose = 4 mM; catalyst dosage = 0.5 g/L; pH = 9100%1O2[18]
MnFe2O4/BC+PMSBisphenol-AICa = 20 mg/L; PMS dose = 0.2 g/L; catalyst dosage = 0.2 g/L; pH = 7.0100%O2•− and 1O2[118]
MgFe2O4/MgO/BC+PMSSulfamethoxazoleICa = 20 mg/L; PMS dose = 1 mM; catalyst dosage = 0.4 g/L; pH = 5.6100%1O2[119]
CoWO4/Co-doped/BC+PMSChlortetracyclineICa = 20 mg/L; PMS dose = 0.3 mM; catalyst dosage = 0.03 g/L; pH = 5.2100%1O2[120]
CoFe2O4/BC+PAATetracycline hydrochlorideICa = 10 mg/L; PDS dose = 0.6 mM; catalyst dosage = 1 g/L; pH = 596%1O2[121]
FeS/BC+PSTetracyclineICa = 200 mg/L; PMS dose = 10 mM; catalyst dosage = 0.3 g/L; pH = 3.687.4%SO4•− and HO[122]
N-doped/Boehmeria nivea BC+PMSTetracyclineICa = 20 mg/L; PMS dose = 1 mM; catalyst dosage = 0.1 g/L; pH = 7.0 96.5%1O2[123]
N-doped/Magnetic BC+PMSSulfadiazineICa = 10 mg/L; PMS dose = 1 mM; catalyst dosage = 0.25 g/L; pH = 5.595.2%SO4•− and HO[124]
ICa—initial concentration.
Table 4. Applications of BC-based catalysts in photocatalytic processes for the remediation of pollutants.
Table 4. Applications of BC-based catalysts in photocatalytic processes for the remediation of pollutants.
BC-Based Catalytic SystemsTargeted PollutantsOperational ParametersReduction EfficiencyDominant RadicalsRef.
TiO2/Chitosan BC+UVRhodamine BICa = 80 mg/L; catalyst dose = 0.5 g/L; power = 500 W; λ < 420 nm; t = 270 min100%O2•− and HO[150]
TiO2/walnut shells BC+UVMethyl orangeICa = 20 mg/L; catalyst dose = 0.25 g/L; power = 500 W; λ = 360 nm; t = 150 min96.9%HO[151]
N-doped/TiO2/BC+UVMethyl orangeICa = 20 mg/L; catalyst dose = 0.25 g/L; power = 500 W; λ = 360 nm; t = 90 min97.6%HO[152]
g-C3N4/BC+UVEnrofloxacinICa = 10 mg/L; catalyst dose = 1 g/L; power = 500 W; pH = 6.6, λ < 420 nm; t = 12 h81.1%O2•− and holes (h+)[153]
g-C3N4/Crawfish shell BC+visible lightEnrofloxacinICa = 10 mg/L; catalyst dose = 1 g/L; power = 500 W; pH = 7, λ > 420 nm; t = 8 h90%O2•−[154]
g-C3N4/Graphene-like BC+PMS+visible lightTetracyclineICa = 10 mg/L; catalyst dose = 0.2 g/L; PMS dose = 0.2 g/L.; pH = 5.45; t = 60 min90%O2•− and 1O2[155]
K-doped/g-C3N4/BC+visible lightNaphthalenICa = 20 mg/L; catalyst dose = 0.5 g/L; power = 200 W; λ = 400~800 nm; t = 180 min82.2%HO, O2•− and h+[156]
S-doped/g-C3N4/BC+visible lightTetracyclineICa = 10 mg/L; catalyst dose = 1 g/L; λ > 420 nm; t = 60 min81.7%O2•− and h+[157]
Fe/Cu/Sludge BC+PI+UVDiclofenac sodiumICa = 20 mg/L; PI dose = 5 mM; catalyst dose = 0.1 g/L; power = 60 W; pH = 6.9; λ = 254 nm; t = 60 min99.7%IO3[143]
Zn-Co-LDH/BC+UVgemifloxacin GntibioticICa = 15 mg/L; catalyst dose = 0.75 g/L; power = 10 W; pH = 5.5; t = 130 min92.7%HO[158]
g-MoS2/Straw BC+visible lightTetracycline hydrochlorideICa = 20 mg/L; catalyst dose = 10 mg/L; power = 300 W; pH = 5; λ > 420 nm; t = 60 min90%h+ and HO[159]
BiOBr/Lignin-BC+visible lightRhodamine BICa = 30 mg/L; catalyst dose = 0.2 g/L; power = 300 W; λ > 420 nm; t = 60 min99.2%O2•− and h+[160]
Bi2O2CO3/Rice husk BC+visible lightTetracyclineICa = 70 mg/L; catalyst dose = 0.6 g/L; power = 300 W, pH = 6.37; t = 60 min84.7%1O2, O2•− and h+[161]
SnS2/Tea leaves BC+LED lightAmoxi cillinICa = 20 mg/L; catalyst dose = 0.2 g/L; power = 23 W; pH = 5; t = 120 min93.7%HO[57]
ICa—initial concentration.
Table 5. Applications of BC-based catalysts in sonocatalytic processes for the remediation of pollutants.
Table 5. Applications of BC-based catalysts in sonocatalytic processes for the remediation of pollutants.
BC-Based Catalytic SystemsTargeted PollutantsOperational ParametersReduction EfficiencyDominant RadicalsRef.
Rice husk BCPropylparabenICa = 1 mg/L; catalyst dose = 125 mg/L; pH = 5.7, t = 45 min; power = 36 W78%HO[183]
Chitosan/TiO2/Grapefruit BCCiprofloxacinICa = 10 mg/L; catalyst dose = 1 g/L; pH = 6.0, t = 25 min; power = 150 W85.23%O2•−, h+ and HO[186]
ZnO nanorods/Wheat husks and paper sludge BCGemifloxacinICa = 20 mg/L; catalyst dose = 1.5 g/L; pH = 5.5, t = 45 min; power = 300 W96.10%HO[187]
Fe-Cu-LDH/BCCefazolin sodiumICa = 0.1 mM; catalyst dose = 1 g/L; pH = 6.5, t = 80 min; power = 300 W97.60%HO[188]
Ag3PO4–Fe3O4/Bamboo BCBisphenol AICa = 10 mg/L; catalyst dose = 50 mg/L; pH = 7, t = 60 min; power = 177 W100%HO[189]
ICa—initial concentration.
Table 6. Literature studies on BC-based catalysts in electrocatalytic systems for pollutant degradation.
Table 6. Literature studies on BC-based catalysts in electrocatalytic systems for pollutant degradation.
BC-Based Catalytic SystemsTargeted PollutantsOperational ParametersCurrent/
Potential
Reduction EfficiencyDominant RadicalsRef.
Sludge BCMethyl orangeICa = 10 mg/L; t = 240 min; Na2SO4 dose = 0.1 mM; d = 2 cm0.05 A94.5%HO[205]
Sludge BC+PMSImidaclopridICa = 0.5 mg/L; pH = 3.0, t = 60 min; PMS dose = 1 M, catalyst dose = 0.2 g/L25 V95.%HO and 1O2[206]
Lignin-derived BCDexamethasoneICa = 25 mg/L; pH = 3, t = 120 min; Na2SO4 dose = 50 mM; d = 2.0 cm11.11 mA/cm2100%HO[207]
Banana-peel BCBromophenol blueICa = 10 mg/L; pH = 7, t = 60 min; Na2SO4 dose = 10 mM; d = 3.0 cm100 mA87.4%/[208]
Banana-peel BC+PSIbuprofenICa = 2 mg/L; pH = 3, t = 120 min; Na2SO4 dose = 3 mM; d = 3.0 cm250 mA100%HO and SO4•−[209]
Nickel foam/Sludge BC+PSSulfamethazineICa = 50 mg/L; pH = 3.0, t = 60 min; PS dose = 10 mM; Na2SO4 dose = 40 mM; d = 2.0 cm50 mA100%HO and SO4•−[210]
ZnCl2/BCPhenolICa = 40 mg/L; pH = 3.0, t = 90 min; Na2SO4 dose = 0.1 M; d = 3 cm−0.25 V100%HO[211]
PTFE/Black carbon+PMSCarbamazepineICa = 0.042 mM; pH = 3.0, t = 40 min; PMS dose = 50 mM; Na2SO4 dose = 0.1 M0.0286 A/cm297.6%HO, SO4•−, 1O2, and O2•−[196]
Ti-Sn-Ce/Bamboo BCCoking wastewaterICa = 2 mg/L; pH = 7.9, t = 150 min; Na2SO4 dose = 3 mM; d = 2.0 cm30 mA/cm2100%HO[212]
N-doped/Kapok fiber BCSulfamethoxazoleICa = 10 mg/L; pH = 5, t = 60 min; Na2SO4 dose = 50 mM11 mA/cm2100%HO[213]
N-doped/Coffee residues BCTetracyclineICa = 100 mg/L; pH = 7, t = 120 min; Na2SO4 dose = 5 mM; d = 2.0 cm4 mA/cm270.4%HO, 1O2, and O2•−[214]
Fe/N-doped/BC catalytic membraneTetracyclineICa = 5 mg/L; pH = 7, t = 180 min; Na2SO4 dose = 20 mM0.01 mA/cm2100%HO and O2•-[215]
ICa—initial concentration.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Han, M.; Liu, Z.; Huang, S.; Zhang, H.; Yang, H.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, K.; Zeng, Y. Application of Biochar-Based Materials for Effective Pollutant Removal in Wastewater Treatment. Nanomaterials 2024, 14, 1933. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14231933

AMA Style

Han M, Liu Z, Huang S, Zhang H, Yang H, Liu Y, Zhang K, Zeng Y. Application of Biochar-Based Materials for Effective Pollutant Removal in Wastewater Treatment. Nanomaterials. 2024; 14(23):1933. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14231933

Chicago/Turabian Style

Han, Meiyao, Ziyang Liu, Shiyue Huang, Huanxing Zhang, Huilin Yang, Yuan Liu, Ke Zhang, and Yusheng Zeng. 2024. "Application of Biochar-Based Materials for Effective Pollutant Removal in Wastewater Treatment" Nanomaterials 14, no. 23: 1933. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14231933

APA Style

Han, M., Liu, Z., Huang, S., Zhang, H., Yang, H., Liu, Y., Zhang, K., & Zeng, Y. (2024). Application of Biochar-Based Materials for Effective Pollutant Removal in Wastewater Treatment. Nanomaterials, 14(23), 1933. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14231933

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop