Next Article in Journal
The Synthesis of Sponge-like V2O5/CNT Hybrid Nanostructures Using Vertically Aligned CNTs as Templates
Next Article in Special Issue
Transfer-Free Analog and Digital Flexible Memristors Based on Boron Nitride Films
Previous Article in Journal
Necking Reduction at Low Temperature in Aspect Ratio Etching of SiO2 at CF4/H2/Ar Plasma
Previous Article in Special Issue
Internal Resistor Effect of Multilayer-Structured Synaptic Device for Low-Power Operation
 
 
Communication
Peer-Review Record

Read Operation Mechanism of Feedback Field-Effect Transistors with Quasi-Nonvolatile Memory States

Nanomaterials 2024, 14(2), 210; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14020210
by Juhee Jeon, Kyoungah Cho * and Sangsig Kim *
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Nanomaterials 2024, 14(2), 210; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14020210
Submission received: 26 December 2023 / Revised: 16 January 2024 / Accepted: 17 January 2024 / Published: 18 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Semiconductor Nanomaterials for Memory Devices)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

In this research, the author discusses the read operation mechanism of feedback field-effect Transistors with quasi-nonvolatile memory states by TCAD. From their results, write pulses of 40 ns form potential barriers in their channels, and charge carriers are accumulated (depleted) in these channels, generating the memory state “State 1 (State 0)”. Read pulses of 40 ns read these states with a retention time of 3s, and the read pulses influence the potential barrier formation and carrier accumulation. The potential barriers were analyzed using junction voltage and current density to explore the memory states.  However, here are a few questions for this research.

 

1.     For the charge carriers are accumulated (depleted) in these channels issue, please showing the charge carriers simulated distribution in a 2D or 3D image.

2.     For the potential barrier formation and carrier accumulation influenced by the read pulses, please give the simulated carriers' distribution before and after the read pulse in a 2D or 3D image.

 

3.     There are many simulation parameters within the TCAD. The author should list them in a table. This could help the reader to simulate the results. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The following issues must be addressed:

1.       Remove all pronouns (We, our,…) from the manuscript;

2.       Introduction part should be significantly improved by outlining what is new and innovative in this work;

3.       Figures resolutions must be improved;

4.       Discussion part should not resume on presenting the results that can be observed from different graphs; the author must focus on comparing the results and providing insight perspectives.

5.       Conclusion part is too general as well. Must focus on the most representative results.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The manuscript can be published in present form.

Back to TopTop