Next Article in Journal
Assembling Near-Infrared Dye on the Surface of Near-Infrared Silica-Coated Copper Sulphide Plasmonic Nanoparticles
Next Article in Special Issue
Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoneedles with Hierarchical Structure for Controllable Catalytic Activity of 4-Nitrophenol Reduction
Previous Article in Journal
Wavelength-Independent Excitation Bessel Beams for High-Resolution and Deep Focus Imaging
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Synthesis and Application of Ion-Exchange Magnetic Microspheres for Deep Removal of Trace Acetic Acid from DMAC Waste Liquid

1
College of Chemical & Pharmaceutical Engineering, Jilin Institute of Chemical Technology, Jilin 132022, China
2
Centre of Analysis and Measurement, Jilin Institute of Chemical Technology, Jilin 132022, China
3
School of Petrochemical Technology, Jilin Institute of Chemical Technology, Jilin 132022, China
4
Steel Making Plant of Jilin Jianlong Iron and Steel Co., Ltd., Jilin 132001, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2023, 13(3), 509; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13030509
Submission received: 21 December 2022 / Revised: 20 January 2023 / Accepted: 25 January 2023 / Published: 27 January 2023

Abstract

:
In order to develop a deep method for removing trace acetic acid from industrial solvents, a type of quaternary ammonium-salt-modified magnetic microspheres was developed as a potential nanoadsorbent for low-concentration acetic-acid-enhanced removal from DMAC aqueous solution. The ion-exchange magnetic microspheres (Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+) have been prepared by a two-step sol-gel method with N-trimethoxysilylpropyl-N, N, N-trimethylammonium chloride as functional monomer, tetraethyl orthosilicate as a cross-linking agent, Fe3O4@SiO2 as a matrix. The nanocomposite is characterized by SEM, FI-IR, XRD, VSM, and XPS. Moreover, the optimization of adsorption experiments shows that the maximum adsorption capacity of nanoadsorbent is 7.25 mg/g at a concentration = 30 mg/L, adsorbent dosage = 10 mg, V = 10 mL, and room temperature. Furthermore, the saturated Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+ achieved an efficient regeneration using a simple desorption method and demonstrated a good regeneration performance after five adsorption/desorption cycles. In addition, Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+ was used to remove acetic acid in DMAC waste liquid; the adsorption effect is consistent with that of a nanoadsorbent of acetic acid in an aqueous solution. These results indicate that Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+ can efficiently treat acetic acid that is difficult to remove from DMAC waste liquid.

1. Introduction

N, N-dimethylacetamide (DMAC) is an essential solvent for synthetic fibers, and it is usually recycled via extraction and distillation in practical production [1]. DMAC will decompose to a certain extent and produce acetic acid during high-temperature distillation. However, the generated acetic acid and DMAC form azeotrope, and thus a distillation method cannot be used to realize the deep separation of acetic acid and DMAC. Importantly, residual acetic acid will further accelerate the decomposition of DMAC in the next DMAC recovery process. Therefore, the deep removal of acetic acid plays a crucial role in inhibiting the hydrolysis of DMAC. In recent years, few studies have focused on the separation of low-concentration acetic acid from DMAC aqueous solutions. Generally, acetic acid is removed by two main methods. In the first method in Liu’s lab, DMAC waste was diluted with water to 60~80% of the water content, and then sodium hydroxide was added to neutralize the acetic acid in the solution [2]. Next, DMAC was recovered through extraction and distillation from the neutralized aqueous solution. However, it is prone to producing large amounts of salt scales that can corrode easily equipment and cause device blockages [2]. In the second method, Li’s research team adsorbed and removed acetic acid using column chromatography [3]. However, the efficiency of column chromatography technology is low, and thus it has not yet been applied and popularized in industry. In recent years, some studies have been published on the adsorption of acetic acid. Guo and Chen’s research group reported a method of using MOF material UiO-66 to adsorb acetic acid in an aqueous solution [4,5,6]. Yang et al. prepared an alkaline site-modified MgO for the selective adsorption of the CH3COOH/C6H6 binary mixture, and their results show the highest selectivity [7]. Chelazzi et al. synthesized ZnO/castor oil-derived polyurethanes materials, which can be useful in other fields where the efficient capture of acetic acid is necessary [8]. Baglioni et al. prepared zinc oxide-castor oil polyurethane hybrids (ZnO/COPs), which can be used as acetic acid removers in the preventive conservation of cultural heritage [9]. Although they are not used for the removal of acetic acid in a DMAC solvent system, they can be used as a reference for this removal.
Magnetic solid phase extraction technique (MSPE) is a modern separation and purification technology [10,11]. It uses magnetic or magnetic-modified materials as adsorbents and can be directly separated from the matrix via an external magnetic field. Therefore, MSPE is simple to operate, efficient has no centrifugal filtration, and can be widely applied for the extraction and separation of trace pollutants [12,13,14]. The proposed magnetic ion exchange technique is a combination of magnetic solid-phase extraction and ion exchange. It has the dual characteristics of fast exchange speed and fast separation, as well as being inexpensive and convenient to operate. Importantly, it can replace traditional chromatography technology and is widely used to separate contaminants [15,16,17].
In this study, an anion-exchange magnetic microsphere was synthesized using the two-step sol-gel method, its adsorption behavior and regeneration were studied, and a real sample analysis of acetic acid on a nanoadsorbent was conducted. For the first time, a prepared Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+ was used to trace acetic acid removal from a DMAC aqueous solution, providing a rapid and low-energy-consumption process for the deep removal of acetic acid from industrial DMAC.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents and Instruments

Fe3O4 magnetic microspheres (400 nm) were purchased from Jinzhuzhizao Biotechnology Co., Ltd (Jilin, China). Ethanol (AR, ≥99.5%). Acetic acid (AR, ≥99%), tetraethyl orthosilicate (AR, ≥99%), ammonia solution (28.0–30.0%), and methanol (AR, 99.5%) were obtained from Tianjin Damao Chemicals Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China). N-[3-(Trimethoxysilyl)propyl]-N,N,N-trimethylammonium chloride (50% in methanol) and tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) were purchased from Alfa Aesar Chemical Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Deionized water was obtained from a Millipore Milli-Q apparatus.
Infrared (IR) spectra of the samples were characterized by Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrometry (Spectrum One, Perkin-Elmer, Philadelphia, PA, USA). X-ray diffraction (XRD) (D8 FOCUS, Bruker, Salbruken, Germany) with Cu Kα radiation (k = 1.5406 A°) was used to analyze the alteration in the crystallographic phases of magnetic species, and the scanning range was in a 2θ range of 10–80°. Field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) (Zeiss Marilin, Marilin, Germany) with EDS was used to observe surface morphology and element distribution. The intensity of magnetism was determined by vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) (703T, Lake Shore, USA). An HPLC analysis was carried out on an LC-20AB system (Shimadzu, Japan). Chromatographic separation analysis was performed on a VP-ODS C18 column (5 μm × 4.6 mm × 150 mm i.d.). The mobile phase consisted of methanol (mobile phase A) and ultrapure water with 0.1% phosphoric acid (mobile phase B), A:B = 5:95. The flow rate was 1.0 mL/min, detection wavelength was monitored at 210 nm, and the injection volume was 20 μL for each input.

2.2. Preparation of Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+

2.2.1. Preparation of Fe3O4@SiO2 Magnetic Microspheres

First, 0.2 g Fe3O4, 80 mL anhydrous ethanol, and 20 mL distilled water were added to a round-bottom flask under ultrasonication for 15 min, followed by the addition of 2 mL concentrated ammonia aqueous solution, and the mixture was stirred mechanically for 20 min. Then, 1 mL tetraethoxysilane(TEOS) was added to the above reactor drop-by-drop, and the reaction was stirred for 5 h at room temperature. After complete reaction, the product was washed with water and alcohol, the final product was diluted with water to a concentration of 50 mg/mL [18].

2.2.2. Preparation of Ion-Exchange Magnetic Microspheres

In the next step, 5 mL Fe3O4@SiO2, 150 mL anhydrous ethanol, 25 mL distilled water, 1 mL N-[3-(Trimethoxysilyl)propyl]-N,N,N-trimethylammonium chloride, 2 mL TEOS and 7.5 mL ammonium hydroxide solution were successively added to a 500 mL three-neck round flask, and then the reaction mixture was mechanically stirred at 40 °C for 3 h. Afterward, the ion-exchange magnetic microspheres (Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+) were collected by magnetic force, and the product was alternately washed 5 times with water and ethanol to remove the excess reagents, before being dried in a drying oven [19,20].

2.3. Adsorption Experiments

The adsorption experiments were performed in triplicate, and the acetic acid solutions used were prepared using standard acetic acid solutions. The adsorption capability and removal efficiency of acetic acid on Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+ was calculated using the following equations:
q e = C 0 C e × V m
R e = C 0 C e C 0 × 100 %
where qe (mg/g) is the adsorption capacity of acetic acid and Re (%) is the removal efficiency, representing the percentage of acetic acid reduced after adsorption. C0 and Ce (mg/L) are the initial acetic acid initial and equilibrium concentrations, respectively. m (g) is the weight of Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+, and V (L) is the volume of phosphate solution.
To optimize the adsorption experimental conditions, batch experiments were conducted in a 25 mL three-mouth flask. The mixtures were shaken at 150 r/min, and the temperature was maintained at 25 ± 1 °C. After reaching equilibrium and then magnetic separation, the residual acetic acid concentration was determined by HPLC-DAD. The effect of the ion-exchange magnetic microspheres dose on the acetic acid adsorption capacity was performed at dosages ranging from 5 mg to 25 mg. Regarding the influence of temperature on adsorption capacity, the mixture was placed in a water bath and shaken at 25 °C, 35 °C, and 45 °C, respectively. Regarding the concentration effect, the experiments employed initial concentrations of 10 mg/L, 20 mg/L, and 30 mg/L, and samples were taken at required time intervals (0–60 min) for acetic acid analysis.

2.4. Regeneration Experiments

The exhausted Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+ was collected by magnetic separation after a 30 min adsorption period. Afterward, 0.1 M NaOH was mixed and stirred with adsorbents to optimize the desorption solution. Then, the adsorbent was washed with deionized water to neutrality and dried for the next reuse regeneration cycle.

2.5. Real Sample Measurement

Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+ (2 g and 3 g) was accurately weighed in a 100 mL three-necked flask, added into 50 mL of acetic acid solution with a mass fraction of 0.006–0.06% (60–600 mg/L) and DMAC mass fraction of 10%, and mechanically stirred at room temperature for 20 min. Then, the adsorption capacity was calculated. For comparisons, acetic acid in water was also tested in parallel following the same procedure.

3. Results

3.1. Characterization of Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+

Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+ was synthesized and used the nanocomposite to remove acetic acid from DMAC waste liquid via the processes illustrated in Scheme 1. Firstly, super-paramagnetic Fe3O4 was coated with a silica layer using a sol-gel method, resulting in excellent stability and easy surface modification of iron oxide due to the hydrophilic properties of the silica shell. Secondly, TEOS was selected as the coupling agent, and N-[3-(Trimethoxysilyl)propyl]-N,N,N-trimethylammonium chloride as a functional monomer, a layer of quaternary ammonium (QA) was modified on the surface of Fe3O4@SiO2 through a condensation hydrolysis reaction, to form the resulting Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+ [21]. Thirdly, the –N(CH3)3+ groups of the nanocomposite were freely exposed to the surrounding solution and interacted with the specific targets, such as acetic acid or other ions in solution, via ion exchange [22] (bottom of the figure).
The morphology of magnetic microspheres is identified by SEM. As shown in Figure 1a, Fe3O4 nanoparticles exhibit spherical shapes with rough surfaces. After coating with SiO2 (Figure 1b), the spherical-shaped Fe3O4@SiO2 has a smooth surface, which makes it easier to modify and enhances its dispersibility in water. Then, a layer of quaternary ammonium (QA) was modified on the surface of Fe3O4@SiO2 to form Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+. In Figure 1c, it is clearly shown that quaternary ammonium forms in situ around Fe3O4@SiO2 microspheres with irregular shapes.
Figure 2a shows the FT-IR spectra of Fe3O4, Fe3O4@SiO2, and Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+, respectively. For all the microspheres, a peak at 585 cm−1 corresponded to the Fe-O stretching vibration [23]. The peaks located between 1000 and 1250 cm−1, as well as those at 798 cm−1, assigned to the stretching mode of Si-OH and Si-O-Si in silica [24], respectively, indicating that the silicon layers were successfully coated on the surface of Fe3O4 by the sol-gel method. In addition, a new peak at 1479 cm−1 is assigned to the asymmetric bending modes of the head N-(CH3)3 methyl group, which is caused by the introduction of quaternary ammonium in the Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+ [20,25]. Meanwhile, the declining peak intensity of Fe-O and Si-O-Si in Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+ demonstrates the successful aggregations of quaternary ammonium onto the Fe3O4@SiO2. Furthermore, from the XRD results (Figure 2b), the presence of crystal planes with cubic crystal structures proves that all the microspheres are composed of Fe3O4 [26]. The intensity of the Fe3O4 characteristic peaks weakens after coating silica layers and quaternary ammonium shells, but the nanocrystalline crystal properties of magnetite particles are not destroyed during the synthesis processes of the Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+. The above results are strongly indicative of the successful fabrication of the target product as follows: quaternary ammonium-type ion-exchange microspheres (Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+).
The full-survey spectrum of the Fe3O4@SiO2 and Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+ are presented in Figure 3, and there are significant peaks at 532.05 eV, 152.19 eV, and 102.54 eV corresponding to O 1 s, Si 2 s, and Si 2 p, respectively [27,28]. Moreover, the high-resolution spectra of Si 2 p and N 1 s are shown in Figure 2b,c. In Si 2 p spectrum, the strength of Si decreases before and after coating quaternary ammonium. Then, the N 1 s spectrum forms a new peak at 402.63 eV, corresponding to the C-N functional groups, due to the introduction of -N(CH3)3+ from quaternary ammonium [29,30]. These results indicate that the synthesis of Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+ is successful. Figure 3d shows that the saturation magnetizations of Fe3O4@SiO2 and Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+ are 47.85 and 40.49 emu/g, respectively. The composite magnetism decreases due to the non-magnetic layer of -N(CH3)3+ on the surface. Although the magnetic saturation intensity of Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+ is reduced, it can easily be separated from the water under an external magnetic field (inset).

3.2. Optimization of Absorption Condition by Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+

The optimization of the experimental conditions designed by batch adsorption experiments is displayed in Figure 4. As shown in Figure 4a, the increase in the dose of Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+ has a negative effect on adsorption because the ratio of acetic acid to the active site decreases. The effect of temperature variation on acetic acid adsorption is shown in Figure 4b. With the temperature increase in the range of 25–45 °C, the adsorption capacity increases from 7.20 to 11.01 mg/g, indicating that acetic acid adsorption is an endothermic process. The influence of acetic acid concentration on the adsorption capacity of synthesized materials (Figure 4c) reveals that, with the increase in concentration from 10 to 50 mg/L, the adsorption capacity increases from 1.81 to 8.67 mg/g. This is due to the presence of vacant sites that are initially more accessible for adsorption; the repulsive forces between the ions dominate and hinder their accessibility. The data show that the adsorption capacity significantly increases in the first ten minutes as the time elapses, with no significant change in the adsorption capacity. Ultimately, under comprehensive consideration, the maximum adsorption capacity is 7.25 mg/g, where the condition of Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+ dosage = 1 g/L, initial concentration = 30 mg/L, v = 10 mL, and temperature = 25 °C.

3.3. Regeneration Study

For the recovery of Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+ after adsorption, 0.1 M NaOH was used as the eluent for elution. After elution, the Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+ was collected by a magnet, washed until neutral, dried, and re-adsorbed again. As depicted in Figure 5, after five adsorption–desorption cycles, the adsorption capacity of the nanoadsorbents was only reduced by less than 5%, suggesting that synthetic Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+ has an excellent regeneration performance. In addition, the nanomaterials before and after the adsorption of acetic acid remained unchanged in the morphology and crystal structure (Figure S1).

3.4. Real Sample Measurement

To have an insight into the practical applicability of synthesized Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+, which is applied to extract acetic acid from the DMAC waste liquid. The nanoadsorbent (2 g and 3 g) is added to the aqueous solution and the DMAC waste liquid with an acetic acid concentration of 0.006 and 0.06%, respectively. After full adsorption, the supernatant is assayed by HPLC-DAD, as depicted in Figure 6. When the mass concentration of acetic acid is 0.006% in water and DMAC waste liquid, the removal rate is 100%. Additionally, while the mass concentration of acetic acid increases to 0.06%, the removal rate of acetic acid in water and DMAC waste liquid is the same to be about 60%. This means that the change in the matrix does not affect the removal of acetic acid by Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+, and a better removal effect is achieved by increasing the amount of nanoadsorbent (insert picture). All the above conclusions confirm that the Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+ is practical for removing acetic acid from DMAC waste liquid.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, a novel quaternary ammonium ion-exchange magnetic microspheres (Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+) was synthesized under normal thermal and atmospheric conditions and used for the deep removal of trace acetic acid from industrial solvents. The use of a nanoadsorbent was confirmed by SEM, FTIR, XRD, VSM, and XPS analyses. After optimizing the adsorption conditions through batch experiments, Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+ demonstrated the efficient removal of acetic acid. Moreover, ion exchange played a key role in this acetic acid removal. Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+ can be effectively regenerated by 0.1 mol/L NaOH and reused five times in adsorption–desorption cycles; the adsorption capacity reduces only by less than 5%. Therefore, the synthesized Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+ is potentially applicable for extracting acetic acid from the DMAC waste liquid. Additionally, the extraction result is close to the analyte in an aqueous solution. Therefore, it provides a useful tool for rapidly and effectively removing acetic acid from industrial DMAC via a low-energy process.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano13030509/s1, Figure S1: FTIR spectra and SEM images of Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+ (b-before, c-after acetic acid adsorption).

Author Contributions

Methodology, Z.L.; software, X.J., Z.L. and S.Y.; validation, Y.L., H.Z., and Y.J.; formal analysis, X.Z. and X.L.; investigation, J.C. and S.W.; resources, Z.L. and S.W.; data curation, X.J. and S.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, S.Y. and Z.L.; writing—review and editing, S.Y., Z.L., and X.Z.; project administration, S.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (22106051), the program of Jilin Department of Science and Technology (20200901021SF, 20210509054RQ), Jilin Province Development and Reform Commission (2020C036-4), the Education Department of Jilin Province (JJKH20210229KJ).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Potthast, A.; Rosenau, T.; Sixta, H.; Kosma, P. Degradation of cellulosic materials by heating in DMAc/LiCl. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 7757–7759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Liu, W.B. Process for separating acetic acid from DMAC azeotrope. CN 101838215B, 27 March 2013. [Google Scholar]
  3. Li, H.F.; Wang, C.X. Adsorption separation process of acetic acid in DMAC aqueous solution. J. ZheJiang. Univ. (Eng. Sci.) 2016, 50, 1725–1729. [Google Scholar]
  4. Yu, C.; Liu, H.; Lyu, J.; Xiao, Z.; Bai, P.; Guo, X. Tuning adsorption capacity by alkoxy groups: A study on acetic acid adsorption on UiO-66 analogues from aqueous solution. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 12272–12279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, H.; Lan, X.; Bai, P.; Guo, X. Adsorptive removal of acetic acid from water with metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2016, 111, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, M.; Zhang, D.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y. Investigation on the adsorption desulfurization effect of carboxyl and phosphotungstic acid modified UiO-66. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2022, 542, 121135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yang, F.; Li, W.; Zhong, X.; Tu, W.; Cheng, J.; Chen, L.; Lu, J.; Yuan, A.; Pan, J. The alkaline sites integrated into biomass-carbon reinforce selective adsorption of acetic acid: In situ implanting MgO during activation operation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 297, 121415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zuliani, A.; Chelazzi, D.; Mastrangelo, R.; Giorgi, R.; Baglioni, P. Adsorption kinetics of acetic acid into ZnO/castor oil-derived polyurethanes. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023, 632 Pt A, 74–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zuliani, A.; Bandelli, D.; Chelazzi, D.; Giorgi, R.; Baglioni, P. Environmentally friendly ZnO/Castor oil polyurethane composites for the gas-phase adsorption of acetic acid. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 614, 451–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, G.F.; Zhao, M.M.; Zhao, L.M. The drug interaction potential of berberine hydrochloride when co-administered with simvastatin, fenofibrate, gemfibrozil, metformin, glimepiride, nateglinide, pioglitazone and sitagliptin in beagles. Arab. J. Chem. 2022, 15, 103562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ren, K.Y.; Zhang, W.L.; Cao, S.R.; Wang, G.M.; Zhou, Z.Q. Carbon-based Fe3O4 nanocomposites derived from waste pomelo peels for magnetic solid-phase extraction of 11 triazole fungicides in fruit samples. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Zhu, L.; Kong, X.; Yang, C.; Ren, B.; Tang, Q. Fabrication and characterization of the magnetic separation photocatalyst C-TiO2@Fe3O4/AC with enhanced photocatalytic performance under visible light irradiation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 381, 120910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xue, F.; Wang, B.; Chen, M.; Yi, C.; Ju, S.; Xing, W. Fe3O4-doped lithium ion-sieves for lithium adsorption and magnetic separation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2019, 228, 115750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xing, W.N.; Liu, Q.; Wang, J.Y.; Xia, S.Y.; Ma, L.; Lu, R.; Zhang, Y.J.; Huang, Y.D.; Wu, G.Y. High selectivity and reusability of biomass-based adsorbent for chloramphenicol removal. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Anthis, A.H.C.; Matter, M.T.; Keevend, K.; Gerken, L.R.H.; Scheibler, S.; Doswald, S.; Gogos, A.; Herrmann, I.K. Tailoring the colloidal stability, magnetic separability, and cytocompatibility of high-capacity magnetic anion exchangers. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2019, 11, 48341–48351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wang, L.; Liu, L.; Zhang, Z.H.; Zhao, B.; Li, J.J.; Dong, B.J.; Liu, N. 17 alpha-Ethinylestradiol removal from water by magnetic ion exchange resin. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2018, 26, 864–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Phetrak, A.; Lohwacharin, J.; Sakai, H.; Murakami, M.; Oguma, K.; Takizawa, S. Simultaneous removal of dissolved organic matter and bromide from drinking water source by anion exchange resins for controlling disinfection by-products. J. Environ. Sci. 2014, 26, 1294–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zhang, Q.; Ge, J.; Goebl, J.; Hu, Y.; Sun, Y.; Yin, Y. Tailored synthesis of superparamagnetic gold nanoshells with tunable optical properties. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 1905–1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhou, J.Q.; Mei, G.J.; Yu, M.M.; Song, X.W. Effect and mechanism of quaternary ammonium salt ionic liquid as a collector on desulfurization and desilication from artificial mixed bauxite using flotation. Miner. Eng. 2022, 181, 107523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dudek, S.; Kolodynska, D.C. Arsenic(V) removal on the lanthanum-modified ion exchanger with quaternary ammonium groups based on iron oxide. J. Mol. Liq. 2022, 347, 117985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Qiao, S.Y.; Liu, Q.W.; Fan, Z.Z.; Tong, Q.L.; Cai, L.; Fu, Y.F. Magnetic hyperbranched molecular materials for treatment of oily sewage containing polymer in oilfield compound flooding. Front. Chem. 2022, 10, 865832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zou, S.W.; Koh, K.Y.; Chen, Z.H.; Wang, Y.Y.; Chen, J.P.; Zheng, Y.M. Adsorption of organic and inorganic arsenic from aqueous solution: Optimization, characterization and performance of Fe-Mn-Zr ternary magnetic sorbent. Chemosphere 2022, 288, 132634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Tudose, I.V.; Mouratis, K.; Ionescu, O.N.; Romanitan, C.; Pachiu, C.; Pricop, E.; Khomenko, V.H.; Butenko, O.; Chernysh, O.; Barsukov, V.Z.; et al. Carbon allotropes-based paints and their composite coatings for electromagnetic shielding applications. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. de Mendonca, E.S.D.T.; de Faria, A.C.B.; Dias, S.C.L.; Aragon, F.F.H.; Mantilla, J.C.; Coaquira, J.A.H.; Dias, J.A. Effects of silica coating on the magnetic properties of magnetite nanoparticles. Surf. Interfaces 2019, 14, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, K.; Li, P.; Cai, J.; Xiao, S.; Yang, H.; Li, A. Efficient adsorption of both methyl orange and chromium from their aqueous mixtures using a quaternary ammonium salt modified chitosan magnetic composite adsorbent. Chemosphere 2016, 154, 310–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhang, S.D.; Zhou, Y.Y.; Chen, H.L. Synthesis of core-shell Fe3O4@C@SiO2-SO3H/CH3 particles for the photothermally actuated esterification reaction in biofuel upgrade. Funct. Mater. Lett. 2022, 15, 2250008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, L.Y.; Shan, X.C.; Zhao, Y.M.; Xiao, Z.Y.; An, Q.D.; Zhai, S.R. Efficient phosphate capture of Fe3O4/UiO-66-NH2/CeO2 in wide pH spectrum. Micropor. Mesopor. Mat. 2022, 331, 111653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yuan, D.Z.; Zhao, J.Z.; Zhang, Q.H.; Lu, P.; Wang, Y.; He, Y.; Liu, Z.R.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, X.H.; Meng, C. Highly efficient extraction of uranium from aqueous solution using imidazole functionalized core-shell sunflower-like superparamagnetic polymer microspheres: Understanding adsorption and binding mechanisms. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 12656–12668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Tahmasbi, M.; Koukabi, N.; Seidi, F. A novel core@double-shell three-layer structure with dendritic fibrous morphology based on Fe3O4@TEA@Ni-organic framework: A highly efficient magnetic catalyst in the microwave-assisted Sonogashira coupling reaction. Nanoscale 2022, 14, 7189–7202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zheng, X.Y.; Zheng, H.L.; Zhou, Y.H.; Sun, Y.J.; Zhao, R.; Liu, Y.Z.; Zhang, S.X. Enhanced adsorption of Orange G from aqueous solutions by quaternary ammonium group-rich magnetic nanoparticles. Colloids Surface A 2019, 580, 123746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration of the synthesis procedure of Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+.
Scheme 1. Schematic illustration of the synthesis procedure of Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+.
Nanomaterials 13 00509 sch001
Figure 1. SEM images of Fe3O4 (a), Fe3O4@SiO2 (b) and Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+ (c).
Figure 1. SEM images of Fe3O4 (a), Fe3O4@SiO2 (b) and Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+ (c).
Nanomaterials 13 00509 g001
Figure 2. (a) FT-IR spectra and (b) XRD pattern of Fe3O4, Fe3O4@SiO2, Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+.
Figure 2. (a) FT-IR spectra and (b) XRD pattern of Fe3O4, Fe3O4@SiO2, Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+.
Nanomaterials 13 00509 g002
Figure 3. XPS scan of Fe3O4@SiO2 and Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+: (a) survey, (b) Si 2 p, (c) N 1 s, and (d) VSM diagram of Fe3O4@SiO2 and Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+.
Figure 3. XPS scan of Fe3O4@SiO2 and Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+: (a) survey, (b) Si 2 p, (c) N 1 s, and (d) VSM diagram of Fe3O4@SiO2 and Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+.
Nanomaterials 13 00509 g003
Figure 4. Effect adsorbent dose (a), temperature (b), different concentration, and contact time (c) on the adsorption capacity of Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+.
Figure 4. Effect adsorbent dose (a), temperature (b), different concentration, and contact time (c) on the adsorption capacity of Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+.
Nanomaterials 13 00509 g004
Figure 5. Regeneration capacity of Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+ for acetic acid removing.
Figure 5. Regeneration capacity of Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+ for acetic acid removing.
Nanomaterials 13 00509 g005
Figure 6. The removal rate of acetic acid in water and DMAC waste liquid by Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+.
Figure 6. The removal rate of acetic acid in water and DMAC waste liquid by Fe3O4@SiO2@N(CH3)3+.
Nanomaterials 13 00509 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jin, X.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Ju, Y.; Zeng, X.; Li, X.; Chen, J.; Liu, Z.; Yu, S.; Wang, S. Synthesis and Application of Ion-Exchange Magnetic Microspheres for Deep Removal of Trace Acetic Acid from DMAC Waste Liquid. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 509. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13030509

AMA Style

Jin X, Lu Y, Zhang H, Ju Y, Zeng X, Li X, Chen J, Liu Z, Yu S, Wang S. Synthesis and Application of Ion-Exchange Magnetic Microspheres for Deep Removal of Trace Acetic Acid from DMAC Waste Liquid. Nanomaterials. 2023; 13(3):509. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13030509

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jin, Xuna, Yao Lu, Heyao Zhang, Yuheng Ju, Xiaodan Zeng, Xiang Li, Jie Chen, Zhigang Liu, Shihua Yu, and Shanshan Wang. 2023. "Synthesis and Application of Ion-Exchange Magnetic Microspheres for Deep Removal of Trace Acetic Acid from DMAC Waste Liquid" Nanomaterials 13, no. 3: 509. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13030509

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop