Next Article in Journal
Ostwald Ripening and Antibacterial Activity of Silver Nanoparticles Capped by Anti-Inflammatory Ligands
Next Article in Special Issue
A Review on the Progress, Challenges, and Performances of Tin-Based Perovskite Solar Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Catalyst Design: Counter Anion Effect on Ni Nanocatalysts Anchored on Hollow Carbon Spheres
Previous Article in Special Issue
Butanediammonium Salt Additives for Increasing Functional and Operando Stability of Light-Harvesting Materials in Perovskite Solar Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 13
Issue 3
10.3390/nano13030427
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Controlled Reduction of Sn4+ in the Complex Iodide Cs2SnI6 with Metallic Gallium

by
Shodruz T. Umedov
1,
Anastasia V. Grigorieva
1,2,*,
Alexey V. Sobolev
2,3,
Alexander V. Knotko
1,2,
Leonid S. Lepnev
4,
Efim A. Kolesnikov
1,
Dmitri O. Charkin
2 and
Andrei V. Shevelkov
2
1
Department of Materials Science, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory 1/73, 119991 Moscow, Russia
2
Department of Chemistry, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory 1/3, 119991 Moscow, Russia
3
Department of Chemistry, MSU-BIT University, Shenzhen 517182, China
4
Lebedev Physical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninskiy Prospect 53, 119333 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2023, 13(3), 427; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13030427
Submission received: 26 December 2022 / Revised: 10 January 2023 / Accepted: 15 January 2023 / Published: 20 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Design and Synthesis of New Photoactive Perovskite Nanomaterials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Metal gallium as a low-melting solid was applied in a mixture with elemental iodine to substitute tin(IV) in a promising light-harvesting phase of Cs2SnI6 by a reactive sintering method. The reducing power of gallium was applied to influence the optoelectronic properties of the Cs2SnI6 phase via partial reduction of tin(IV) and, very likely, substitute partially Sn4+ by Ga3+. The reduction of Sn4+ to Sn2+ in the Cs2SnI6 phase contributes to the switching from p-type conductivity to n-type, thereby improving the total concentration and mobility of negative-charge carriers. The phase composition of the samples obtained was studied by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and 119Sn Mössbauer spectroscopy (MS). It is shown that the excess of metal gallium in a reaction melt leads to the two-phase product containing Cs2SnI6 with Sn4+ and β-CsSnI3 with Sn2+. UV–visible absorption spectroscopy shows a high absorption coefficient of the composite material.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Complex tin-based halides [1] with a general formula AIMIIX3 (where A is an inorganic or organic cation such as Cs+, K+, Rb+, or CH3NH3+ [2]; MIV = Sn; and X = a halide anion of F−, Cl−, Br−, or I−) are most promising as light-harvesting components in modern photovoltaic solar cells (PSCs) as alternatives to lead halides. Recently, the power-conversion efficiency of Pb-based inorganic–organic perovskite PSCs has overrun 25% in single-junction architecture [3]. Such progress of perovskite-solar-cell efficiency is a result of both the chemical design of new light-harvesting compounds and also the evolution of the overall structure of the photovoltaic cell that originated from the architecture of the dye-sensitized solar cell [4] and transformed later to a thin sandwich-like structure with nano-sized functional layers of solid materials [5]. Research of complex halides as new light-harvesting materials gives a chance to minimize significantly the size and make flexible perovskite photovoltaic cells.
It is remarkable that all of the most efficient perovskite solar cells are based on lead-containing light absorbers; however, this raises concerns owing to their high toxicity [6,7]. Despite the progressive increase in the efficiency of lead PSCs, the toxicity of lead requires development of new lead-free analogues with appropriate optical and electrical characteristics. Lately, γ-CsSnI3 with the p-type conductivity was used in PSCs as a light-harvesting compound; however, the phase has demonstrated rather poor stability to oxidation and hydrolysis [8,9,10,11,12]. Ichiba and Kanatzidis described four polymorphs for CsSnI3, including black B-α-CsSnI3, black B-β-CsSnI3, black B-γ-CsSnI3, and yellow (or green) Y-γ-CsSnI3 [13,14]. Optical methods have shown that, among these polymorphs, the black metastable B-γ-CsSnI3 phase demonstrates metallic conductivity, high hole mobility, rather strong luminescence, and a large optical absorption coefficient [15,16,17], as well as the improved phase stability in a close-packed cell [8,18,19]. The compound is also suitable for PSCs as a hole conductive layer [20] or light-absorber layer [21]. Despite this, instability problems of γ-CsSnI3 as a light-harvesting compound in cycling and slow degradation reduce the lifetime and efficiency of such PSCs. The reasons for instability of the CsSnI3 phases originate from the high reduction activity of Sn2+, which is easily oxidized to Sn4+ in moist air and disproportionately converted into Sn4+ and Sn0 in an inert atmosphere. Some problems with the negative-charge-carrier transfer could also take place.
Recently, Lee et al. [22] suggested the perovskite-like phase of Cs2SnI6 as a more stable analogue among tin-based lead-free perovskite light harvesters [23,24]. Since that moment, Cs2SnI6 in PSCs has been explosively developing as a light absorber or semiconductive PSC compound and is attributed to “double perovskites”. Actually, the phase of Cs2SnI6 with the Fm-3m space group and the lattice parameter a in the range of 11.6276(9) Å [12]—11.65 Å [25,26] is not a “double perovskite” phase but is a complex halide of a K2PtCl6 structure type. Its transport characteristics are also still under discussion. According to Saparov et al. [27], Cs2SnI6 is an n-type semiconductor with a direct band gap (Eg) of 1.26 [22] or 1.62 eV [28]. Lee et al. [22] have presented Cs2SnI6 as a p-type semiconductor for the HTM layer according to its non-stoichiometry and presence of some Sn2+ in Sn4+ positions. The air stability of Cs2SnI6 is not only due to the 4+ oxidation state in this compound but also due to the shorter interatomic distance and stronger covalency of the Sn–I bonds in the [SnI6]2– octahedra than in perovskite structure of CsSnI3 [27,29].
Doping of Cs2SnI6 with some other elements leads to the formation of new intrinsic defects and to an increase in concentration of charge carriers, which improves the stability of compounds [30,31,32]. Recently, Lee et al. [33] reported that the partial iodine replacement by bromine (Cs2SnI6−xBrx) using a “sandwich” device-fabrication process (a two-step-solution processing technique) makes it more air stable. Nowadays, Cs2SnI4Br2 is known as the most air-stable compound of the Cs2SnI6 type [33]. Recently, we showed the possibility of heterovalent substitution of tin by InIII in Cs2SnI6 [34].
In this study, we report the effect of metal gallium as a reducing agent for the complex iodide Cs2SnI6. We also report here the formation of the substitutional solid solution Cs2Sn1-xGaxI6-x belonging to the K2PtCl6 structure type [35,36]. The reduction of Sn4+ to Sn2+ by metal gallium melt leads to a complex product with varying Sn2+ percentage. A general composition of products with Cs2SnI6-based substitutional solid solution (SS) could be expressed by a general formula of Cs2Sn4+1-xGa3+xI6-x, where xmax is up to 0.15. For the samples obtained with an excess of reductant (RS), no elemental iodine was added to the ampoules (as shown in SI, Table S1).
XRD and Sn119 Mössbauer spectroscopy were applied to investigate the reaction products at different gallium-to-iodine ratios.
Both fundamental and structure-sensitive characteristics of compounds are important for the new materials proposed as light-harvesting compounds. The investigation of Ga-doped (IV) cesium iodostannate as light harvesters included both phase analysis and analysis of the microstructure at the nanolevel.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Syntheses of RS/SS Compounds

The reactions were carried out in sealed quartz ampoules and evacuated to a pressure of 1.6∙10−2 Torr. The reduction samples (RS compounds) (where x = 0–0.2) were prepared by grinding cesium iodide (CsI) (SigmaAldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA, 99.9%), tin iodide (SnI4), and metallic gallium (Ga) (SigmaAldrich, 99.9999%) with the stoichiometric mass ratios given in Table S1 in Supplementary Materials in an agate mortar. The solid-solution samples of Cs2Sn1−xGaxI6−x (SS compounds) were prepared in the same way but with the addition of elemental iodine in small excess amounts proportional to the cesium content. Mass ratios are given in Table S2 in Supplementary Materials. The pristine Cs2SnI6 phase was obtained using the stoichiometric molar ratio of CsI to SnI4 (2:1). The mixtures were sealed in preliminary dried-quartz ampoules and heated with a rate of ~0.2 °C/min to 300 °C and then annealed at this temperature for 96 h. The specimens were cooled to room temperature slowly and opened inside a nitrogen-filled glove box. All products were black in color, and irregularly shaped crystals were observed under a microscope. All samples were kept in closed black Ziploc bags in nitrogen and then studied at room temperature in air.

2.2. Characterization Methods

X-ray diffraction measurements (XRD) were performed on a Rigaku D/MAX 2500 diffractometer (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a rotating copper anode (Cu-Kα1,2 radiation) and operated at 45 kV and 250 mA from 5 to 80° in 2Ɵ, and the scanning rate was 3° min−1 at a step of 0.02°. The experimental data were analyzed using WinXPow (database PDF2) (STOE & Cie, Version 1.07, Darmstadt, Germany) to define the phase composition, whereas for the lattice parameter calculations, Jana 2006 software (ECA-SIG#3/Institute of Physics, Prague, Czech Republic) was applied. The crystal structure of the materials was designed using the VESTA (JP-Minerals, Tsukuba, Japan) and Diamond (Crystal Impact, Bonn, Germany) programs.
Mössbauer spectroscopy experiments were carried out in closed polycarbonate ampoules during 2 days using an original setup equipped with a Ba119mSnO3 source. Mössbauer spectra at 119Sn nuclei were recorded on an MS-1104Em electrodynamic spectrometer operating in a constant-acceleration mode (CJSC Cordon, Rostov-on-Don, Russia). The analysis and model approximation of the spectra were performed with the SpectrRelax software application [37,38].
UV–visible diffuse reflectance spectra were collected using the UV–visible spectrometer Lambda 950 (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA). Measurements were performed in a spectral range of 200–2000 nm with a step scan of 1 nm at 298 K with a scanning rate of 1 nm/s using quartz glass as a reference. The optical energy band gap (Eg) was acquired using a Tauc plot as a dependence of (αhν)2 on energy (hν).
The microstructure of the samples was studied using a scanning electron microscope with the field emission source LEO SUPRA 50VP (LEO Carl Zeiss SMT Ltd., Oberkochen, Germany) with 250 X–2.5k X magnification. The samples were analyzed by X-ray emission microanalysis with an X/MAX X-ray energy dispersive detector (EDX) (Oxford Instruments, High Wycombe, UK).

3. Results and Discussion

The SS samples of the estimated composition of Cs2Sn4+1−xGa3+xI6−x and RS samples (assuming a composition of Cs2Sn4+1−5xSn2+3xGa3+2xI6−8x) with x = 0–0.2 were synthesized by a reactive sintering method in vacuum (in closed ampoules), while almost in all quoted publications various wet-chemistry methods were applied for synthesizing Cs2SnI6 and other complex iodide materials. The compounds taken in the stoichiometric mass ratios for the SS series are given in Table S1 in Supplementary Materials. Compositions of the RS samples had a lack of elementary iodine and an excess of metal gallium (Table S1, in Supplementary Materials). The weight of each sample was 0.01 g. We observed no traces of the possible reactions between iodine, tin iodide, or metal gallium with quartz ampoules because any reactions were negligible and did not change the stoichiometry of elements during the synthesis.
Samples of the SS series were synthesized in small excess amounts of elemental iodine to produce the I-reach materials with the n-type conductivity and low deficiencies of the anionic sublattice. We supposed the Sn4+ octahedral positions in the Cs2SnI6 structure to be the most preferable for heterovalent substitution by Ga3+ (0.620Å in the octahedral environment), while the reduced tin (Sn2+) cation (1.16 Å) is larger significantly than the 0.690 Å of the Sn4+ ionic radii, which works against the formation of the substitutional solid solution. We proposed the possible products in the RS series to be Cs2SnI6-like compounds with Sn4+ cations substituted partially by Ga3+ or Sn2+ cations (Figure 1a).
It is shown experimentally that all characteristic XRD reflections for the SS series (Figure 1) match well to the peaks generated from the crystal data and are consistent with the experimental data for the Cs2SnI6 phases reported elsewhere [23,39]. For all samples of the SS series, XRD reflections are consistent with the cubic vacancy-ordered perovskite-like structure (Figure 1b). The noticeable shift in the reflection positions to higher or lower 2Ɵ values with increasing Ga/Sn ratio x is not observed.
According to Figure 1b, the XRD patterns of two samples related to the SS series (namely, x = 0.01 and 0.03) and one related to the pristine Cs2SnI6 (where x = 0) can be regarded as single phase. Contrastingly, the XRD patterns of the RS series (Figure 1c) distinctly show the presence of the β-CsSnI3 secondary phase. The most intensive diffraction peaks are associated with reflections of Cs2SnI6 (PDF2 file #73-330), while the weaker group of peaks is associated with reflections of γ-CsSnI3 (PDF2 file #71-1898). The intensities and number of CsSnI3-characteristic reflections increase with the percentage of gallium in the samples before the heat treatment (0→0.15). Meanwhile, diffractograms do not show reflections of any iodogallates such as CsGaI4 and CsGa2I7 (Figure 1c).
It is remarkable that for the samples with the substitution rate x of 0.09–0.15, the presence of B-β-CsSnI3 (PDF2 file #80-2138) was observed. This β-phase is stable thermodynamically at higher temperatures of 78–152 °C but is present in the RS samples together with low-temperature B-γ-CsSnI3.
Table 1 shows the unit-cell parameters for the perovskite-related phase of Cs2SnI6, which were determined using the Le Bail method. The estimated unit-cell parameter a for the undoped Cs2SnI6 perovskite phase was found to be 11.6416 (8) Å, which is close to recently reported data (11.630 (10) Å, according to the PDF2 file 73–330). The evolution of the unit-cell parameter with increasing dopant content for the SS samples demonstrated a slight increase of the cell parameter a to 11.6426 (5) Å (x = 0.05). The unit-cell volume V changes only slightly. It changes the same way with an increase of gallium percentage in the charge (Table 1). It is important that the radius of Ga3+ is smaller than that of Sn4+ (0.62 Å vs. 0.69 Å), and only an insignificant decrease of the unit-cell parameter is expected if gallium(III) partially substitutes for tin(IV). The deficiency in the iodine sublattice could also influence cubic unit-cell parameters in the same manner. In contrast, substitution of Sn4+ ions with the larger cations of Sn2+ could act in a different way by increasing the unit-cell parameter and volume.
The unit-cell parameter a of the “double perovskite” Cs2SnI6 phase was estimated for the RS series to demonstrate its evolution with the substitution rate. The results are presented in Table 2. As soon as the samples include more than one phase of Ga-doped Cs2SnI6, these values are not characteristic for the substituted phases.
To investigate the effect of gallium doping on the crystallization process of the Cs2SnI6 phase, the morphological analysis of the as-prepared SS samples (before grinding) was carried out with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). In order to correctly estimate the distribution of gallium over the volume of the sample, the annealed materials were divided into several parts so that the surface and the fracture (volume) could be explored (Figure S1). In the SEM images (Figure 2 and Figure S2), we can see that, on average, 100~200-micron spherical grains consist of crystallites of different sizes and shapes. Comparatively, Figure S2a4–d4 (x = 0, x = 0.01, x = 0.03, and x = 0.05) provides crystal size spreading based on the fracture top-view images. It is noticeable also that the characteristic grain size increased up to 50 μm with a gallium percentage in a melt, probably as a result of an excess of iodine in the ampoules. A similar effect was found recently for Cs2SnI6 and many other complex iodides [40]. For details, see also Figures S2–S8.
The EDX images and tables of the elemental composition of the samples show that gallium is not evenly distributed across the samples. A large amount of gallium is observed at the grain boundaries, which indicates the possibility of the formation of the CsGaI4 phase. Since CsGaI4 is an ionic liquid and remains in a liquid state at a temperature of 300 °C, it becomes an ion exchanger (or solvent) between precursors/Cs2SnI6, and this is the reason for the increase in the crystal size in doped samples. Gallium can also be seen in Cs2SnI6 crystallites (Figures S3 and S7), albeit in small quantities. We assume that gallium in the Cs2SnI6 structure does not replace tin but is present in the form of interstitial defects in octahedral vacancies (as shown in Figure 1a), so it is not distributed uniformly. Additionally, it should be noted that in the micrographs of backscattered electrons, a chemical contrast that would show the presence of two phases is not observed.
The 119Sn Mössbauer spectroscopy was used to analyze the oxidation state of tin atoms in both series of samples. Figure 3a–c shows characteristic 119Sn Mössbauer spectra for RS samples (x = 0; 0.05; 0.09) after 2 days of spectra collecting (Table 3). In the Mössbauer spectra of the RS series (x = 0.05 and 0.09), the presence of a major sensibly unresolved resonant subspectrum characteristic of Sn4+ (isomer shift δ ≈ 1.36 mm/s, quadrupole splitting ∆ ≈ 0.15 mm/s) and one minor doublet that corresponds to Sn2+ (isomer shift δ = 3.84 mm/s and δ = 3.72 mm/s for x = 0.05 and x = 0.09, respectively) are observed.
The major component can be attributed to the cubic Cs2SnI6 phase [39]. The isomer shift and profile of the spectrum for the double perovskite is further confirmed by the data for the SS sample (x = 0.05) given in Figure 3d. The hyperfine parameters of the phases are given in Table 3. The presence of Sn2+ ions within the sample of the SS series was not found. For the RS series, Mössbauer spectroscopy data do not contradict the results of the XRD phase composition analysis. Additionally, the experimental values of the hyperfine parameters correspond to previously reported data for the three presented individual phases [39,41]. According to Yamada et al. [42], minor quadrupole doublets correspond to the β-CsSnI3 phase. The doublet related to the B-γ-CsSnI3 phase, which has higher quadrupole splitting, is not found, and we assume that this is due to the small amount of this phase in the sample. An excess of the β-CsSnI3 phase in the RS sample with x = 0.05 could be a result of the concentration gradient of gallium in the sample.
To investigate the optical properties of the black-color materials, diffuse reflectance spectra were analyzed in the wavelength range of 200–2000 nm. The estimated optical band gap values for the samples are in the range of 1.23–1.35 eV and diminish with increasing the gallium percentage in the samples. The profiles of the collected absorption spectra correspond to direct-gap semiconductors [43], while the estimated optical Eg values for the samples demonstrate larger Urbach energies for both RS and SS samples with the smaller concentration of gallium dopant. We assume that the decrease in the absorption edge intensity and its slight shift are due to a suppression of vacancies/intrinsic defects with a low formation energy and formation of in-gap states. If the pristine Cs2SnI6 phase is the p-type semiconductor, this phenomenon would contradict the theory. If the SS samples of Cs2Sn1-xGaxI6-x are n-conductive, as reported by most authors, the Ga3+ atoms will serve as electron traps or increase the e’-h˙ recombination probability.
For the RS series (Figure 4a,b), we observed a wider absorption edge than that of the SS series. Most likely, most of the spectra correspond to the superposition of subspectra of the SS phase of Cs2Sn1-xGaxI6-x (Eg observed at 1.31–1.35 eV) and the black-color phase of γ-CsSnI3 (Eg = 1.23 eV [8]). This correlates partly to the absorption spectra of these materials, revealing local maxima at ~630 nm for all samples (Figure 4a,c), with small discrepancies within the SS and RS series.
Thus, the reduction of Sn4+ to Sn2+ by gallium melt leads to the formation of perovskite phases, namely, the black γ-CsSnI3 genuine perovskite and β-CsSnI3 phase as an admixture. The latter is promising for light harvesting. It is remarkable also that Cs2SnI6 is a p-type semiconductor [22] and γ-CsSnI3 is an n-type semiconductor [7]. This fact makes the growth of the sandwich-like planar structures of Cs2SnI6 and γ-CsSnI3 attractive, aiming at the p–n heterojunction materials for the solid-state solar cells [44]. Thus, the composite made of Ga-doped Cs2SnI6 with γ-CsSnI3 and β-CsSnI3 perovskites seems to be a model for further investigation of corresponding cesium iodostannates (II, IV) composite films.

4. Conclusions

Our study improves the understanding of the double-perovskite Cs2SnI6 perspective as a perovskite solar-cell compound. According to the XRD data, no iodogallates were found in the samples for the x < 0.05 compositions, and so the formation of the substitutional solid solution of the double-perovskite Cs2Sn1-xGaxI6-x up to 5 at.% of Ga is still under discussion. On the other hand, the interaction of the tin-based double-perovskite Cs2SnX6 with metal gallium leads to the formation of a new light-harvesting composite compound and a hole- or electron-transport material with improved grain boundaries and appropriate conductivities of charge carriers. It is remarkable also that the presence of Sn2+ cations in the double-perovskite structure is still under discussion due to the easy segregation of tin(II) in a form of individual phases of β-CsSnI3 and γ-CsSnI3. These results suggest that it is possible to optimize the crystal quality and optoelectronic properties by doping the perovskite structures (ABX3, A2BX6, A3B2×9) with relevant heterovalent cations. We expect that this research will be a significant step for obtaining “less toxic” light-absorber materials with improved characteristics.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano13030427/s1. Table S1: Composition of Cs2Sn1-xGaxI6-x solid-solution samples (SS series); Table S2: Composition of samples for the reduction of Cs2SnI6 by metallic gallium (RS); Figure S1: Optical photographs of a piece of compound after synthesis (before grinding) for SEM and EDX measurements (an example of the SS series); Figure S2: SEM images of surface and fracture of all SS series samples; Figure S3: Secondary electron image (a) and (b) backscattered electrons image (with chemical contrast) of fracture and (c) element distribution map of the x = 0.03 SS sample; Figure S4: EDX results (including SEM images and elements table) of fracture of the x = 0.03 SS sample; Figure S5: Backscattered electrons (with chemical contrast) images of surface (a) and (b) fracture of the x = 0.05 SS sample; Figure S6: EDX results (including SEM images and elements table) of fracture of the x = 0.05 SS sample; Figure S7: Secondary electrons image (a) and (b) backscattered electrons image (with chemical contrast) of fracture and (c) element distribution map of the x = 0.11 SS sample; Figure S8: EDX results of surface (a) and (b) fracture of the x = 0.11 SS sample and (c) backscattered electrons image.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.V.G. and A.V.S. (Andrei V. Shevelkov); methodology, S.T.U., A.V.S., A.V.K., L.S.L. and D.O.C.; software, S.T.U. and A.V.S. (Alexey V. Sobolev); validation, S.T.U., A.V.S. (Alexey V. Sobolev), A.V.K. and A.V.S. (Andrei V. Shevelkov); formal analysis, S.T.U., E.A.K. and A.V.G.; investigation, S.T.U.; resources, A.V.G., A.V.S. (Alexey V. Sobolev), A.V.K. and L.S.L.; data curation, S.T.U. and A.V.G.; writing—original draft preparation, S.T.U. and A.V.G.; writing—review and editing, A.V.S. (Alexey V. Sobolev) and A.V.S. (Andrei V. Shevelkov); visualization, S.T.U.; supervision, A.V.G. and A.V.S. (Andrei V. Shevelkov); project administration, A.V.G.; funding acquisition, A.V.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (grant No. 22-23-00585).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This project was performed using the equipment and setups of the collective resource center of the Lomonosov Moscow State University under the title “Technologies for synthesis of new nanostructured materials and their complex characterization”.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Manser, J.S.; Christians, J.A.; Kamat, P.V. Intriguing optoelectronic properties of metal halide perovskites. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 12956–13008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Mitzi, D.B. Synthesis, structure, and properties of organic-inorganic Perovskites and related materials. Prog. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 48, 1–121. [Google Scholar]
  3. Min, H.; Lee, D.Y.; Kim, J.; Kim, G.; Lee, K.S.; Kim, J.; Paik, M.J.; Kim, Y.K.; Kim, K.S.; Kim, M.G.; et al. Perovskite solar cells with atomically coherent interlayers on SnO2 electrodes. Nature 2021, 598, 444–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Penconi, M.; Bianchi, G.; Nitti, A.; Savoini, A.; Carbonera, C.; Pasini, D.; Po, R.; Luzzati, S. A donor polymer with a good compromise between efficiency and sustainability for organic solar cells. Adv. Energy Sustain. Res. 2021, 6, 2100069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Na, H.-J.; Lee, S.-E.; Lee, E.G.; Lee, J.H.; Gong, Y.J.; Kim, H.; Cho, N.-K.; Kim, Y.S. Nanometer-thick Cs2SnI6 perovskite—Polyethylene glycol dimethacrylate composite films for highly stable broad-band photodetectors. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2021, 4, 5309–5318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Matthews, P.D.; Lewis, D.J.; O’Brien, P. Updating the road map to metal-halide perovskites for photovoltaics. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 17135–17150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Green, M.A.; Emery, K.; Hishikawa, Y.; Warta, W.; Dunlop, E.D. Solar cell efficiency tables. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 2016, 24, 905–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Chung, I.; Lee, B.; He, J.; Chang, R.P.H.; Kanatzidis, M.G. All-solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells with high efficiency. Nature 2012, 485, 486–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yu, C.; Chen, Z.; Wang, J.J.; Pfenninger, W.; Vockic, N.; Kenney, J.T.; Shum, K. Temperature dependence of the band gap of perovskite semiconductor compound CsSnI3. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 110, 063526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Chen, Z.; Yu, C.; Shum, K.; Wang, J.J.; Pfenninger, W.; Vockic, N.; Midgley, J.; Kenney, J.T. Photoluminescence study of pol-ycrystalline CsSnI3 thin films: Determination of exciton binding energy. J. Lumin. 2012, 132, 345–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kumar, M.H.; Dharani, S.; Leong, W.L.; Boix, P.P.; Prabhakar, R.R.; Baikie, T.; Shi, C.; Ding, H.; Ramesh, R.; Asta, M.; et al. Lead-free halide perovskite solar cells with high photocurrents realized through vacancy modulation. Adv. Mater. Lett. 2014, 26, 7122–7127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Stoumpos, C.C.; Malliakas, C.D.; Kanatzidis, M.G. Semiconducting tin and lead iodide perovskites with organic cations: Phase transitions, high mobilities, and near-infrared photoluminescent properties. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 52, 9019–9038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yamada, K.; Funabiki, S.; Horimoto, H.; Matsui, T.; Okuda, T.; Ichiba, S. Structural phase transitions of the polymorphs of CsSnI3 by means of rietveld analysis of the X-ray diffraction. Chem. Lett. 1991, 20, 801–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Scaife, D.E.; Weller, P.F.; Fisher, W.G. Crystal preparation and properties of cesium tin(II) trihalides. J. Solid State Chem. 1974, 9, 308–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chung, I.; Song, J.-H.; Im, J.; Androulakis, J.; Malliakas, C.D.; Li, H.; Freeman, A.J.; Kenney, J.T.; Kanatzidis, M.G. CsSnI3: Semiconductor or metal? High electrical conductivity and strong near-infrared photoluminescence from a single material. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 8579–8587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Marshall, K.P.; Walker, M.; Walton, R.I.; Hatton, R.A. Elucidating the role of the hole-extracting electrode on the stability and efficiency of inverted CsSnI3/C60 perovskite photovoltaics. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 41, 21836–21845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Wijesekara, A.; Varagnolo, S.; Dabera, G.D.M.R.; Marshall, K.P.; Pereira, H.J.; Hatton, R.A. Assessing the suitability of copper thiocyanate as a hole-transport layer in inverted CsSnI3 perovskite photovoltaics. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 15722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Huang, L.; Lambrecht, W.R.L. Electronic band structure, phonons, and exciton binding energies of halide perovskites CsSnCl3, CsSnBr3, and CsSnI3. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 88, 165203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lora da Silva, E.; Skelton, J.M.; Parker, S.C.; Walsh, A. Phase stability and transformations in the halide perovskite CsSnI3. Phys. Rev. B 2015, 91, 144107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Zhang, J.; Yu, C.; Wang, L.; Lili, W.; Ren, Y.; Shum, K. Energy barrier at the N719-dye/CsSnI3 interface for photogenerated holes in dye-sensitized solar cells. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 6954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Chen, Z.; Wang, J.J.; Ren, Y.; Yu, C.; Shum, K. Schottky solar cells based on CsSnI3 thin-films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 101, 093901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lee, B.; Stoumpos, C.C.; Zhou, N.; Hao, F.; Malliakas, C.; Yeh, C.-Y.; Marks, T.J.; Kanatzidis, M.G.; Chang, R.P.H. Air-stable molecular semiconducting iodosalts for solar cell applications: Cs2SnI6 as a hole conductor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 15379–15385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Qiu, X.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Qiu, Z.; Yuan, S.; Wang, P.; Cao, B. Lead-free mesoscopic Cs2SnI6perovskite solar cells using different nanostructured ZnO nanorods as electron transport layers. Phys. Status Solidi (RRL) Rapid Res. Lett. 2016, 10, 587–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chander, N.; Chandrasekhar, P.S.; Komarala, V.K. Solid state plasmonic dye sensitized solar cells based on solution processed perovskite CsSnI3 as the hole transporter. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 55658–55665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Werker, W. Die krystallstruktur des Rb2SnI6 und Cs2SnI6. Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas 1939, 58, 257–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kontos, A.G.; Kaltzoglou, A.; Siranidi, E.; Palles, D.; Angeli, G.K.; Arfanis, M.K.; Psycharis, V.; Raptis, Y.S.; Kamitsos, E.I.; Trikalitis, P.N.; et al. Structural stability, vibrational properties, and photolumines-cence in CsSnI3 perovskite upon the addition of SnF2. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 56, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Saparov, B.; Sun, J.; Meng, W.; Xiao, Z.; Duan, H.; Gunawan, O.; Shin, D.; Hill, I.G.; Yan, Y.; Mitzi, D.B. Thin-film deposition and characterization of a Sn-deficient perovskite derivative Cs2SnI6. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 2315–2322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xiao, Z.; Lei, H.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, Y.; Hosono, H.; Kamiya, T. Ligand-hole in [SnI6] unit and origin of band gap in photo-voltaic perovskite variant Cs2SnI6. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2015, 88, 1250–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Xiao, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Hosono, H.; Kamiya, T. Intrinsic defects in photovoltaic perovskite variant Cs2SnI6. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 18900–18903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Ju, M.G.; Chen, M.; Zhou, Y.; Garces, H.; Dai, J.; Padture, N.P.; Zeng, X.C. Earth-abundant nontoxic titanium(IV)-based va-cancy-ordered double perovskite halides with tunable 1.0 to 1.8 eV bandgaps for photovoltaic applications. ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 297–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, G.; Wang, D.; Shi, X. Electronic structure and optical properties of Cs2AẊ2X4 (A = Ge, Sn, Pb; Ẋ, X = Cl, Br, I). AIP Adv. 2015, 5, 127224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, P.; Yang, J.; Wei, S.-H. Manipulation of cation combinations and configurations of halide double perovskites for solar cell absorbers. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 6, 1809–1815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lee, B.; Krenselewski, A.; Baik, S.I.; Seidman, D.N.; Chang, R.P.H. Solution processing of air-stable molecular semiconducting iodosalts, Cs2SnI6-xBrx, for potential solar cell application. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2017, 1, 710–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Umedov, S.T.; Grigorieva, A.V.; Lepnev, L.S.; Knotko, A.V.; Nakabayashi, K.; Ohkoshi, S.-I.; Shevelkov, A.V. Indium doping of lead-free perovskite Cs2SnI6. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ke, J.C.R.; Lewis, D.J.; Walton, A.S.; Spencer, B.F.; O’Brien, P.; Thomas, A.G.; Flavell, W.R. Ambient-air-stable inorganic Cs2SnI6 double perovskite thin films via aerosol-assisted chemical vapour deposition. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 11205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Wu, J.; Zhao, Z.; Zhou, Y. The optoelectronic properties improvement of double perovskites Cs2SnI6 by anionic doping (F−). Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Matsnev, M.E.; Rusakov, V.S. SpectrRelax: An application for mossbauer spectra modeling and fitting. AIP Conf. Proc. 2012, 1489, 178–185. [Google Scholar]
  38. Matsnev, M.E.; Rusakov, V.S. Study of spatial spin-modulated structures by Mössbauer spectroscopy using SpectrRelax. AIP Conf. Proc. 2014, 1622, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tudela, D.; Sánchez-Herencia, A.J.; Díaz, M.; Fernández-Ruiz, R.; Menéndez, N.; Tornero, J.D. Mössbauer spectra of tin(IV) iodide complexes. Dalton Trans. 1999, 22, 4019–4023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ullah, S.; Yang, P.; Wang, J.; Liu, L.; Li, Y.; Zafar, Z.; Yang, S.E.; Xia, T.; Guo, H.; Chen, Y. The fabrication of lead-free Cs2SnI6 perovskite films using iodine-rich strategy for optoelectronic applications. Phys. Status Solidi A 2021, 218, 2100271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dalpian, G.M.; Liu, Q.; Stoumpos, C.C.; Douvalis, A.P.; Balasubramanian, M.; Kanatzidis, M.G.; Zunger, A. Changes in charge density vs. changes in formal oxidation states: The case of Sn halide perovskites and their ordered vacancy analogues. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2017, 1, 025401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yamada, K.; Matsui, T.; Tsuritani, T.; Okuda, T.; Ichiba, S. 127I-NQR, 119Sn Mössbauer effect, and electrical conductivity of MSnI3 (M = K, NH4, Rb, Cs, and CH3NH3). Z. Nat. 1990, 45, 307–312. [Google Scholar]
  43. Qiu, X.; Cao, B.; Yuan, S.; Chen, X.; Qiu, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Ye, Q.; Wang, H.; Zeng, H.; Liu, J.; et al. From unstable CsSnI3 to air-stable Cs2SnI6: A lead-free perovskite solar cell light absorber with bandgap of 1.48 eV and high absorption coefficient. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2017, 159, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhang, J.; Li, S.; Yang, P.; Liu, W.; Liao, Y. Enhanced stability of lead-free perovskite heterojunction for photovoltaic applications. J. Mater. Sci. 2018, 53, 4378–4386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 13 00427 g001a 550Nanomaterials 13 00427 g001b 550
Figure 1. (a1) Possible positions of heteroatoms (Ga3+) in Cs2SnI6 perovskite lattice; (a2) Cs2SnI6 unit cell; (a3) Cs2SnI6 reduction result. XRD data for (b) Cs2SnI6-based solid solutions and (c) the samples obtained by reduction with the melt of metallic gallium (x = 0–0.15). In diffractograms of SS samples, impurity-phase CsGaI4—reflections are marked with + symbols—and all unmarked reflections belong to Cs2SnI6. In diffractograms of RS series, β-CsSnI3 peaks are marked with ⊗-symbols, γ-CsSnI3 peaks are marked with ο-symbols, and Cs2SnI6 peaks with the symbol *.
Figure 1. (a1) Possible positions of heteroatoms (Ga3+) in Cs2SnI6 perovskite lattice; (a2) Cs2SnI6 unit cell; (a3) Cs2SnI6 reduction result. XRD data for (b) Cs2SnI6-based solid solutions and (c) the samples obtained by reduction with the melt of metallic gallium (x = 0–0.15). In diffractograms of SS samples, impurity-phase CsGaI4—reflections are marked with + symbols—and all unmarked reflections belong to Cs2SnI6. In diffractograms of RS series, β-CsSnI3 peaks are marked with ⊗-symbols, γ-CsSnI3 peaks are marked with ο-symbols, and Cs2SnI6 peaks with the symbol *.
Nanomaterials 13 00427 g001aNanomaterials 13 00427 g001b
Nanomaterials 13 00427 g002 550
Figure 2. SEM images of fracture of the samples (a4) x = 0, (b4) x = 0.01, (c4) x = 0.03, and (d4) x = 0.05 (SS-series) after annealing (before grinding). All micrographs are taken at the same magnification.
Figure 2. SEM images of fracture of the samples (a4) x = 0, (b4) x = 0.01, (c4) x = 0.03, and (d4) x = 0.05 (SS-series) after annealing (before grinding). All micrographs are taken at the same magnification.
Nanomaterials 13 00427 g002
Nanomaterials 13 00427 g003 550
Figure 3. (a–c) Mössbauer spectra of the product of reduction of Cs2SnI6 with gallium melt with x = 0–0.09; (d) SS sample with x = 0.05^.
Figure 3. (a–c) Mössbauer spectra of the product of reduction of Cs2SnI6 with gallium melt with x = 0–0.09; (d) SS sample with x = 0.05^.
Nanomaterials 13 00427 g003
Nanomaterials 13 00427 g004a 550Nanomaterials 13 00427 g004b 550
Figure 4. (a) Optical absorption spectra and (b) Tauc plots of the absorbance data for RS samples and (c,d) for SS samples, respectively.
Figure 4. (a) Optical absorption spectra and (b) Tauc plots of the absorbance data for RS samples and (c,d) for SS samples, respectively.
Nanomaterials 13 00427 g004aNanomaterials 13 00427 g004b
Table
Table 1. Calculated cell parameters for the Cs2Sn1−xGaxI6−x samples (SS series).
Table 1. Calculated cell parameters for the Cs2Sn1−xGaxI6−x samples (SS series).
xPhasea, ÅCell Volume, Å3Rp, %wRp, %GOF (χ2)
0Cs2SnI611.6416 (8)1577.75 (11)7.5510.631.62
0.01Cs2SnI611.6418 (9)1577.85 (13)7.3710.421.50
0.03Cs2SnI611.6411 (5)1577.58 (7)5.598.691.31
0.05Cs2SnI611.6426 (5)1578.17 (7)6.119.261.3
0.07Cs2SnI611.6411 (3)1577.57 (4)7.1410.541.29
0.09Cs2SnI611.6398 (7)1577.04 (9)9.4814.141.19
0.11Cs2SnI611.6407 (9)1577.41 (12)9.0313.351.15
Table
Table 2. Calculated cell parameters for the Cs2SnI6 samples reduced by metallic gallium (RS series).
Table 2. Calculated cell parameters for the Cs2SnI6 samples reduced by metallic gallium (RS series).
xPhasea, ÅCell Volume, Å3Rp, %wRp, %GOF (χ2)
0Cs2SnI611.6458 (9)1579.450 (13)9.313.191.25
0.05Cs2SnI611.6438 (3)1578.654 (2)9.814.171.17
CsSnI38.7252 (1)477.137 (7)
0.09Cs2SnI611.6482 (1)1580.43 (2)10.1614.81.22
CsSnI38.7339 (8)477.29 (6)
0.12Cs2SnI611.647 (1)1580.26 (2)10.6415.011.20
CsSnI38.6995 (2)482.23 (8)
0.15Cs2SnI611.664 (2)1587.18 (2)11.8116.431.27
CsSnI38.6016 (2)461.24 (10)
Table
Table 3. Hyperfine parameters of the 119Sn Mössbauer spectra of RS and SS samples with different gallium content (x) at RT.
Table 3. Hyperfine parameters of the 119Sn Mössbauer spectra of RS and SS samples with different gallium content (x) at RT.
SeriesxTin Typeδ (mm/s)∆ (mm/s)W (mm/s)A (%)
RS0.00Sn4+1.36 (1)0.15 (4)0.85 *100
0.05Sn4+1.35 (1)0.18 (3)0.85 *91.4 (9)
Sn2+3.84 (8)0.31 (7)0.85 *8.6 (9)
0.09Sn4+1.36 (1)0.17 (3)0.85 *90.9 (7)
Sn2+3.72 (7)0.30 (6)0.85 *9.1 (7)
SS0.05^Sn4+1.37 (1)0.22 (2)0.85 *100
* indicates values are fixed; W is the full width at the half height; A is a percent area of subspectrum.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Umedov, S.T.; Grigorieva, A.V.; Sobolev, A.V.; Knotko, A.V.; Lepnev, L.S.; Kolesnikov, E.A.; Charkin, D.O.; Shevelkov, A.V. Controlled Reduction of Sn4+ in the Complex Iodide Cs2SnI6 with Metallic Gallium. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 427. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13030427

AMA Style

Umedov ST, Grigorieva AV, Sobolev AV, Knotko AV, Lepnev LS, Kolesnikov EA, Charkin DO, Shevelkov AV. Controlled Reduction of Sn4+ in the Complex Iodide Cs2SnI6 with Metallic Gallium. Nanomaterials. 2023; 13(3):427. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13030427

Chicago/Turabian Style

Umedov, Shodruz T., Anastasia V. Grigorieva, Alexey V. Sobolev, Alexander V. Knotko, Leonid S. Lepnev, Efim A. Kolesnikov, Dmitri O. Charkin, and Andrei V. Shevelkov. 2023. "Controlled Reduction of Sn4+ in the Complex Iodide Cs2SnI6 with Metallic Gallium" Nanomaterials 13, no. 3: 427. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13030427

APA Style

Umedov, S. T., Grigorieva, A. V., Sobolev, A. V., Knotko, A. V., Lepnev, L. S., Kolesnikov, E. A., Charkin, D. O., & Shevelkov, A. V. (2023). Controlled Reduction of Sn4+ in the Complex Iodide Cs2SnI6 with Metallic Gallium. Nanomaterials, 13(3), 427. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13030427

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop