Next Article in Journal
Synthesis of ZnFe2O4 Nanospheres with Tunable Morphology for Lithium Storage
Previous Article in Journal
Novel Effective Photocatalytic Self-Cleaning Coatings: TiO2-Polyfluoroalkoxy Coatings Prepared by Suspension Plasma Spraying
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Further Improvement Based on Traditional Nanocapsule Preparation Methods: A Review

Nanomaterials 2023, 13(24), 3125; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13243125
by Yihong Zhou, Peng Wang, Faling Wan, Lifang Zhu, Zongde Wang, Guorong Fan, Peng Wang, Hai Luo, Shengliang Liao, Yuling Yang, Shangxing Chen * and Ji Zhang *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Nanomaterials 2023, 13(24), 3125; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13243125
Submission received: 11 November 2023 / Revised: 7 December 2023 / Accepted: 10 December 2023 / Published: 12 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Nanofabrication and Nanomanufacturing)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear, the review does not provide a complete and clear overview of nanocapsules synthesis protocols and applications. Works on microemulsions, nanoemulsions, nanoparticles (nanoprecipitation) are presented and discussed. Many references are outdated.

It would be more appropriate to restructure the entire work with a view to discussing nanoencapsulation methods rather than the synthesis of nanocapsules as presented by the authors.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

The English language and syntax need a complete overhaul. Some sentences are far removed from scientific language and make reading difficult.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear Authors,

The overview is clear, comprehensive and relevant to the field. There are many recent reviews on encapsulation methods, but the current review is still relevant and of interest to the scientific community. However, it is recommended to increase the number of citations of the most recent in exchange for older items. The most recent are not in the vast majority. Figures are adequate, although not very eye-catching. It is recommended to enrich the tables with more recent examples. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

I consider the authors' revision work sufficient for publication.

Back to TopTop