Next Article in Journal
Field-Driven Magnetic Phase Diagram and Vortex Stability in Fe Nanometric Square Prisms
Previous Article in Journal
Atom-to-Device Simulation of MoO3/Si Heterojunction Solar Cell
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cu-Ag Nanocomposite Pastes for Low Temperature Bonding and Flexible Interlayer-Interconnections

1
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402, Taiwan
2
Division of Materials and Manufacturing Science, Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
3
Innovation and Development Center of Sustainable Agriculture, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(23), 4241; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12234241
Submission received: 21 September 2022 / Revised: 23 November 2022 / Accepted: 23 November 2022 / Published: 29 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Nanocomposite Materials)

Abstract

:
Cu-Ag composite pastes consisting of carboxylate-capped Ag nanoparticles, spray-pyrolyzed Ag submicron particles, and copper formate were developed in this study for low-temperature low-pressure bonding. The joints between the Cu, Ni/Au, and Ag finished substrates can be well formed at temperatures as low as 160 °C under a load pressure of 1.6 MPa. The joints with Cu substrates possess 18.0 MPa bonding strength, while those with Ag surface finish could be enhanced to 23.3 MPa. When subject to sintering under 10 MPa at 160 °C, the electrical resistivity of the sintered structure on metal-coated polymeric substrates was around 11~17 μΩ-cm and did not differ too much when subjected to harsh reliability tests such as mechanical bending and thermal cycling tests, as well as electrical current stressing. This low-temperature, low-pressure nanocomposite paste shows great potential as interconnect materials for microelectronics or flexible device assembly.

1. Introduction

In response to anxiety over human health and the environment, most countries have established legislation to ban the use Pb from electronic products [1]. Researchers have searched for alternatives to Pb-containing solders for two decades [2]. Pb-free eutectic solders, such as Sn-In, Sn-Bi, Sn-Ag, and Sn-Cu, have their limitations [3]. For instance, their die attachment for chips cannot withstand high operating temperatures. Electrically conductive adhesives (ECAs) bonding technologies are also regarded as a Pb-free alternative and have been actively applied for microelectronic packaging applications [4]. All ECAs consist of a polymer matrix with submicron-sized electrically conductive fillers [5]. Despite the low bonding temperature (<200 °C), they provide insufficient mechanical strength and thermal and electrical conductance. This is because the sticky components just hold the ECAs together and the conductive particles are only in contact with each other, instead of having robust links.
The size-dependent properties of nanomaterials, such as their highly specific surface area and decreased melting point, have been maximized for their practical use. Au, Ag, and Cu nanoparticles have been applied in the fabrication of interconnectors for microelectronics, including flat panel displays and flexible and wearable devices [6,7,8,9,10]. Nanoparticles can be sintered at low processing temperatures, and thus, the interconnections formed can withstand high operating temperatures. Ag has been well-studied and widely adopted due to its good electrical conductivity. However, it still exhibits the drawbacks of high cost and poor electrochemical migration resistance. Cu nanoparticles have recently been proposed as a replacement. Cu NPs, however, have a huge problem—easy oxidation.
To solve this problem, Cu-Ag alloy, Cu@Ag core shells, as well as a mixture of Cu and Ag particles have been developed [11,12,13,14,15]. The combination of Cu and Ag exhibits many advantages, such as improved electrochemical migration resistance compared with Ag [11,12] and superior anti-oxidation properties than Cu. Improvement in thermal stability has also been demonstrated [13,14,15].
In this study, a composite paste designed for a low-load and low temperature bonding process comprised of nano- and submicron-sized Ag particles with copper formate is proposed. The purpose is to mix metallic particles of various sizes together to fill the interstices between bigger particles with smaller ones [16]. Adding copper formate can further fill the gaps and form a more solid structure with improved electrical conductance [17]. A recent report verified that copper formate additives in copper nanoparticle pastes decomposed into new active nano copper at 300 °C and were able to strengthen the Cu-Cu joints bonded in the process [18]. The goal of this study is to robustly bond the samples at a temperature of 160 °C, which vulnerable polymeric substrates can withstand. In view of their future use as interconnections with flexible substrates and components, the joints between two Cu cladded PI substrates (PI: polyimide) were also prepared using the developed composite pastes. Reliability was tested using mechanical and thermal cycling tests (TCT). Current stress was also evaluated. To clarify the surface finish effects, Ni/Au and Ag coating onto Cu foils were also adopted.

2. Experimental Procedures

2.1. Fabrication of Nanocomposite Pastes

Composite pastes for a low-load and low temperature bonding process (designated as LNCP) consisting of nano- and submicron-sized Ag particles and copper formate were prepared. Ag nanoparticles were protected by self-assembled carboxylate monolayers with six carbon atoms (hexanoic acid). The synthetic method has been introduced elsewhere [19], but the detailed procedure is as follows. First, 1.4156 g (8.33 mmol) AgNO3 was added to a toluene solution (31.69 mL) containing hexanoic acid (1.861 g, 16.67 mmol) and 0.5656 g PVP (poly-vinylpyrrolidone, as the dispersant), and the mixture was stirred vigorously. Then, 1.65 mL (16.67 mmol) n-butylamine was added dropwise over a period of 2.5 min to the solution. After the mixture had been stirred for a further 3.5 min, the solution became milk white. A 50 mL aqueous NaBH4 solution (0.158 g, 4.17 mmol) as a reducing reagent was added dropwise over 15 min with vigorous stirring. After the addition of the reductant, the solution was stirred for 1 h. Products were precipitated by the addition of 200 mL acetone. Following centrifugation, resuspending in methanol, precipitating and washing with acetone, the desired dark-brown silver nanoparticles were obtained.
Thermal spray pyrolysis was used to prepare submicron-sized Ag particles. The synthesis procedure was as follows. Silver acetate precursor (99%, AgC2H3O2, Alfa Aesar, Ward hill, MA, USA) was used to prepare silver particles using a laboratory-scale spray pyrolysis electrostatic deposition system. In the spray pyrolysis process, the precursor aqueous solution (0.06 M) was atomized into fine droplets using an ultrasonic nebulizer at 1.65 MHz. An air flow with a controlled flow rate carried the droplets into the heated tubular reactor with three zones: pre-heating, calcination and post-heating in sequence, in which 400 °C was chosen as the calcination temperature. The pre-heating and post-heating temperatures were set at 250 and 350 °C, respectively. The droplets in the reactor underwent solvent evaporation, solute precipitation, precursor decomposition and conversion into Ag particles. The resulting powders were then collected using a cylindrical electrostatic collector with an applied high-voltage potential of −16 kV.
The prepared nanoparticles (NPs) were examined using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and UV-vis spectroscopy. The submicron-particles (SMPs) were observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
Ag particles of two different sizes and copper formate were mixed well to form composite pastes. There were two ingredients in the nanocomposite pastes. The first was 25 wt% for Ag NPs, 25 wt% for Ag SMPs, 20 wt% for copper formate and 30 wt% for α-terpineol, and the second was 25 wt% for Ag NPs, 25 wt% for Ag SMPs, 20 wt% for copper formate, 20 wt% for α-terpineol and 10 wt% for ethyl cellulose. α-terpineol was the solvent and ethyl cellulose acted as the thickener. The above hybrid pastes were named 6C-LNCP and 6C-LNCP(EC), respectively.

2.2. Bonding Process

Nanocomposite composite pastes were applied to the polished faying surface of a 5 × 5 × 1 mm3 Cu block, which was set onto a 12 × 12 × 3 mm3 Cu block to provide rigid joints. The Cu-to-Cu rigid joint specimens were bonded using the composite pastes with a thermal compression bonder in a N2 atmosphere. In addition to Cu, Ni/Au, and Ag surface finishes were also adopted to clarify the substrate effect. Ni/Au was prepared by electroplating onto Cu blocks, while the Ag coating was achieved using electroless deposition following the reaction below [20].
C6H12O6 (aq) + 2Ag(NH3)2OH (aq) → C5H11O5COONH4 (aq) + 2Ag (s) + 3NH3 (aq) + H2O (l)
The bonding process comprised two ramp-soak steps. In the first step, the temperature was allowed to remain at 70 °C for 10 min to evacuate the organic components from the paste. After that, the samples were heated to 160 °C for 20 min under 1.6 MPa bonding pressure. FTIR was used to observe the residual organics in the LNCP sintered structure. To identify the structural phases, synchrotron radiation X ray diffraction (SR-XRD) observations were made on the sintered LNCP.
Cu foil-cladded PI substrates (PI: polyimide) were also used in this study (Figure 1). As shown, LNCP pastes were screen-printed onto copper pads with an area of 5 mmX5 mm. Some of the Cu pads were coated with a Ni/Au or Ag layer. Similar to the rigid samples (Cu blocks), the bonding process followed a two-ramp-soaking step with thermal compression bonding up to 160 °C (Table 1). The bonding pressure was increased to 10 MPa. For comparison, commercial bonding materials for flexible substrates, anisotropic conductive films (ACF) and silicone were also used to bond to the Cu foil-cladded PI substrate. As also noted in Table 1, the bonding conditions for ACF were 185 °C under 2 MPa for 20 s. The bonding conditions for silicone were room temperature under 2 MPa for 12 h.

2.3. Mechanical Testing for Rigid and Flexible Joints

The shear strength was measured by breaking both the rigid and flexible joints with a QC-506M1 bond tester (Cometech Testing Machines Co., Ltd., Taichung, Taiwan) shear tool with a shear rate of 0.2 mm/min. The reliability of the sintered joints on PI substrates was evaluated using the cyclic bending fatigue, thermal fatigue, and electrical current stress tests.
As illustrated in Figure 2a,b, the cyclic bending test was carried out at a frequency of 2 Hz for 1000 cycles. The outer bending radius of the PI film (R) was 4 mm, obtained according to Equations [21] (Figure 2b).
R = L 2 π d L L π 2 h 2 12 L 2
where L, dL/L and h denote the initial length, the applied strain and the substrate thickness, respectively. As for thermal cycling, the temperature range was set between 40~85 °C. The soaking time was 15 min and ramping rate was 15 °C/min. Under a constant voltage of 5.4 V, flexible joints were charged with electric current from 0 A to 3 A, with an increase of 0.5 A for each test, as indicated in Figure 1. Electrical resistivity corresponding to the bending or thermal cyclic numbers was recorded, as well as current stressing time.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Ag Particle Characterization

TEM image and diffraction patterns of the Ag NPs are shown in Figure 3a,b. The average diameter of Ag-O2C6 nanoparticles was 6.0 ± 1.0 nm. The PVP additive provided sufficient nanoparticle dispersion, allowing us to determine that the nanoparticles possessed uniform size. The ring diffraction patterns (see Figure 3b,d) verify the pure FCC Ag structure. The NPs could also be identified by the absorption spectra shown in Figure 3c. As illustrated, Ag-O2C6 NPs exhibited plasmon absorption bands with maxima at 414 nm, identical to the reported values. Figure 4 shows the morphology of the submicron particles (SMP). The average size was about 250 nm.

3.2. LNCP Characteristics and Sintered Structure

Figure 5 illustrates the SR-XRD spectra of LNCP sintered structures subjected to heating at 160 °C for 20 or 30 min, respectively. The major components are Ag and a small amount of Cu, detected without oxide formation.
The organic residues in the LNCP sintered structure were examined by FTIR. Figure 6a shows the FTIR spectra of PVP and the six carbon-chain-carboxylate-protected Ag NPs before sintering. The large band observed between 3750 cm−1 and 3000 cm−1 was linked to O-H stretching. The major PVP peaks were 1650 cm−1, 1428 cm−1, and 1288 cm−1. As also indicated in Figure 6a, νasCH2, νsCH2, νasCO2, and νsCO2 stretching peaks were detected [22]. After being subjected to thermal compression at 160 °C for 30 min, there was almost nothing left of the sintered LNCP (red curve), as shown in Figure 6b. Meanwhile, very tiny peaks were observed on the black curve (sintered 6 C-LNCP with ethyl cellulose), which were attributed to C-H and CO2 stretching.

3.3. Joint Strength

Figure 7 illustrates the joint shear strength with different substrates. AFfor 6C-LNCP pastes, the joint strengths were 15.8 MPa for the Cu substrate, 17.7 MPa for Ni/Au, and 19.2 MPa for Ag. It can be clearly seen that the addition of ethyl cellulose enhanced sintering and thus bonding strength. The joint strength for 6C-LNCP(EC) pastes were 18 MPa, 19.9 MPa and an eye-catching 23.3 MPa for Cu, Ni/Au and Ag, respectively. Figure 8 compares our work with the relevant literature [8,9,23,24,25,26,27,28,29], revealing that joints bonded using 6C-LNCP (EC) possessed superior shear strength to those using Ag or Cu NP pastes if the bonding temperature was set as 150 °C or 160 °C.
Figure 9 shows a cross-section of the LNCP(EC) joints, machined using a focused ion beam. All samples exhibited 4 to 7% porosity. The Cu joints showed a unique structural characteristic, that is, Cu tended to segregate in the vicinity of the joint interface (Figure 9c); there was no such Cu segregation for the Ni/Au and Ag substrate-joints. The images given in Figure 10 again verify that Cu segregated at the interface of LNCP(EC)/Cu interface. Considering the thermodynamic properties, the Cu-Ag binary system exhibited a highly positive mixing enthalpy ( Δ H = + 104 meV atom   at   50 at % Cu ) [30], a large lattice mismatch of 12% [31], and a limited electronegativity difference (0.03) [32]. This gave rise to the phase separation feature between Cu and Ag, i.e., Cu and Ag separated instead of dissolving into each other or forming intermetallic compounds. This drove the Cu atoms inside the paste to diffuse toward the Cu substrate. In addition, we also observed that the LNCP sintered structure linked well with the Ag substrate, which is why the Ag substrate joints possessed superior bonding strength.

3.4. Reliability Performance

The reliability test results are given in Figure 11, Figure 12 and Figure 13. The electrical resistivity of the as-prepared LNCP joints was around 11~17 μΩ-cm, i.e., much lower than that of silicone joints (63~219 μΩ-cm) and ACF joints (81~466 μΩ-cm). The excellent electrical conductance again revealed that the LNCP did not suffer from the oxidation problem. Subjected to bending fatigue (Figure 11) or TCT cycles between −45~85 °C (Figure 12), the electrical resistivity of LNCP joints did not increase too much. The same tendency could be also observed in the current stressing test, in which the current was increased from 0.5 A to 3 A (Figure 13). As also revealed, the ACF electrical resistivity rose significantly when subjected to cyclic bending deformation, while the electrical conductance of silicone joints decayed drastically in the TCT and current stressing test. The above results led us to believe that ACF was vulnerable when repeated mechanical strain was applied, while the silicone was easy to damage through temperature variations.
It is interesting that the LNCP joints exhibited excellent performance, regardless of whether they suffered mechanical deformation, thermal deformation (due to CTE mismatch), or Joule heating resulting from current stressing. Even though the Ag-coated substrate has been recommended for Ag-based sintering [33] and also supported better shear strength, as mentioned in Figure 7, it did not behave better than a bare Cu substrate in this study when mechanical bending or TCT tests were involved. This could be ascribed to the effect of the addition of copper formate. Cu segregation may strengthen the interface and thus enhance the fatigue life of flexible interconnections.

4. Conclusions

Newly developed Cu-Ag composite pastes consisting of carboxylate-capped Ag nanoparticles, spray-pyrolyzed Ag submicron particles and copper formate were adopted in this study for bonding at low-temperatures and low bonding load. The joints between Cu, Ni/Au and Ag finished substrates could be well formed at temperatures as low as 160 °C under a load pressure of 1.6 MPa. The joint shear strength with Ag substrates reached 23 MPa, while those of Ni/Au and Cu were 19.9 MPa and 18 MPa, respectively. This nanocomposite paste could also be applied to form interconnections between metal-coated polymeric substrates. With respect to the joints between two Cu or Ag/Cu cladded PI substrates, electrical resistivity down to 11~17 μΩ-cm was obtained after thermal compression at 160 °C under a load pressure of 10 MPa for 20 min. Such flexible joints exhibited excellent tolerance when subjected to bending fatigue, thermal cycles or current stressing. The reliability performance was superior to that observed with joints created using commercial adhesives, e.g., ACF and silicone.

Author Contributions

Y.-C.L., W.-H.L. and T.-J.W. carried out the experiments. Y.-C.L. also did a literature review. K.Y. supervised nanoparticle sintering technique. J.-M.S. conceived the research idea, led this cooperative work, and prepared the draft. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science and Technology Council (Taiwan, R.O.C.) under contracts MOST 109-2221-E-005-040-MY3, for which the authors are grateful.

Data Availability Statement

The raw/processed data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared at this time due to technical or time limitations.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the “Innovation and Development Center of Sustainable Agriculture” from the Featured Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project of the Ministry of Education (Taiwan, R.O.C.).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, Y.; Moon, K.; Wong, C. Electronics Without Lead. Science 2005, 308, 1419–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Suganuma, K. Advances in Lead-Free Electronics Soldering. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2001, 5, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Abtew, M.; Selvaduray, G. Lead-free Solders in Microelectronics. Mater. Sci. Eng. R 2000, 27, 95–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yim, B.S.; Yim, Y.; Seung, H.O.; Lim, J.; Yong, E.S.; Lei, S.H.; Lim, J.M. Characteristics of Solderable Electrically Conductive Adhesives (ECAs) for Electronic Packaging. Microelectron. Reliab. 2012, 52, 1165–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jesudoss, P.; Mathewson, A.; Wright, W.M.D.; Stam, F. Mechanical Assessment of An Anisotropic Conductive Adhesive Joint of a Direct Access Sensor on A Flexible Substrate for A Swallowable Capsule Application. Microelectron. Reliab. 2013, 53, 452–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ide, E.; Angata, S.; Hirose, A.; Kobayashi, K.F. Metal–metal Bonding Process Using Ag Metallo-organic Nanoparticles. Acta Mater. 2005, 53, 23852393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kim, M.S.; Nishikawa, H. Effects of Bonding Temperature on Microstructure, Fracture Behavior and Joint Strength of Ag Nanoporous Bonding for High Temperature Die Attach. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2015, 645, 264–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hu, A.; Guo, J.Y.; Alarifi, H.; Patane, G.; Zhou, Y.; Compagnini, G.; Xu, C.X. Low Temperature Sintering of Ag Nanoparticles for Flexible Electronics Packaging. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 97, 153117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yan, J.; Zou, G.; Hu, A.; Zhou, Y.N. Preparation of PVP coated Cu NPs and the Application for Low-Temperature Bonding. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 15981–15986. [Google Scholar]
  10. Li, W.H.; Lin, P.S.; Chen, C.N.; Dong, T.Y.; Tsai, C.H.; Kung, W.T.; Song, J.M.; Chiu, Y.T.; Yang, P.F. Low Temperature Cu-to-Cu Bonding Using Silver Nanoparticles Stabilized by Saturated Dodecanoic Acid. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2014, 613, 372–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Strehle, S.; Menzel, S.; Jahn, A.; Merkel, U.; Bartha, J.W.; Wetzig, K. Electromigration in Electroplated Cu(Ag) Alloy Thin Films Investigated by Means of Single Damascene Blech Structures. Microelectron. Eng. 2009, 86, 2396–2403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, Y.S.; Lu, Y.C.; Chou, K.S.; Liu, F. Synthesis and Characterization of Silver-Copper Colloidal Ink and Its Performance against Electrical Migration. Mater. Res. Bull. 2010, 45, 1837–1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tsai, C.H.; Chen, S.Y.; Song, J.M.; Chen, I.G.; Lee, H.Y. Thermal Stability of Cu@Ag Core-shell Nanoparticles. Corr. Sci. 2013, 74, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hsiao, C.H.; Kung, W.T.; Song, J.M.; Chang, J.Y.; Chang, T.C. Development of Cu-Ag Pastes for High Temperature Sustainable Bonding. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2017, 684, 500–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liang, M.; Zhu, Y.; Sun, S. Cu@Ag Core-Shell Nanoparticle with Multiple Morphologies: A Simple Surfactant-Free Synthesis and Finite Element Simulation. Micro. Nano Lett. 2020, 15, 393–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Joo, S.J.; Hwang, H.J.; Kim, H.S. Highly Conductive Copper Nano/microparticles Ink via Flash Light Sintering for Printed Electronics. Nanotechnology 2014, 25, 265601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. PChiu, H.; Cheng, W.H.; Lee, M.T.; Yasuda, K.; Song, J.M. Low-Thermal-Budget Photonic Sintering of Hybrid Pastes Containing Submicron/Nano CuO/Cu2O Particles. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1864. [Google Scholar]
  18. Xu, Y.; Dai, D.; Yang, R.; Qian, J.; Wang, P.; Chen, X. Large Area Pressureless Cu-Cu bonding using Formic Acid-treated Cu Particles for Power Device Packaging. In Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Electronic Packaging Technology, Dalian, China, 10–13 August 2022. No. 182631. [Google Scholar]
  19. Dong, T.Y.; Chen, W.T.; Wang, C.W.; Chen, C.P.; Chen, C.N.; Lin, M.C.; Song, J.M.; Chen, I.G.; Kao, T.H. One-step Synthesis of Uniform Silver Nanoparticles Capped by Saturated Decanoate: Direct Spray Printing Ink to Form Metallic Silver Film. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2009, 11, 6269–6275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Riaz, S.; Naz, S.; Younus, A.; Javd, A.; Akram, S.; Nosheen, A.; Ashraf, M. Layer by layer deposition of PEDOT, silver and copper to develop durable, flexible, and EMI shielding and antibacterial textiles. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. 2022, 650, 129486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Park, S.I.; Ahn, J.H.; Feng, X.; Wang, S.; Huang, Y.; Rogers, J.A. Theoretical and experimental studies of bending of inorganic electronic materials on plastic substrates. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2008, 18, 2673–2684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Song, J.M.; Pai, T.Y.; Hsieh, K.H.; Lai, M.Y.; Cheng, C.N.; Liang, S.Y.; Lee, H.Y.; Chen, L.T. Kinetic Study on Low Temperature Coalescence of Carboxylate-Protected Ag Nanoparticles for Interconnect Applications. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 97449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Peng, P.; Hu, A.; Zhao, B.; Gerlich, A.P.; Zhou, Y.N. Reinforcement of Ag nanoparticle paste with nanowires for low temperature pressureless bonding. J. Mater. Sci. 2012, 47, 6801–6811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zou, G.; Yan, J.; Mu, F.; Wu, A.; Ren, J.; Hu, A.; Zhou, Y.N. Low Temperature Bonding of Cu Metal through Sintering of Ag Nanoparticles for High Temperature Electronic Application. Open. Surf. Sci. J. 2011, 3, 70–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, J.D.; Chen, H.; Ji, H.; Li, M. Highly Conductive Cu−Cu Joint Formation by Low-Temperature Sintering of Formic Acid-Treated Cu Nanoparticles. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 33289–33298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Suganuma, K.; Sakamoto, S.; Kagami, N.; Wakuda, D.; Kim, K.S.; Nogi, M. Low-Temperature Low-Pressure Die Attach with Hybrid Silver Particle Paste. Microelectron. Reliab. 2012, 52, 375–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yan, J.; Zou, G.; Wu, A.; Ren, J.; Yan, J.; Hu, A.; Zhou, Y. Pressureless Bonding Process Using Ag Nanoparticle Paste for Flexible Electronics Packaging. Scr. Mater. 2012, 66, 582–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Guo, W.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, X.; Liu, L.; Peng, P.; Zou, G.; Zhou, Y.N. Preparation of Nanoparticle and Nanowire Mixed Pastes and Their Low Temperature Sintering. J. Alloys. Compd. 2017, 690, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Alarifi, H.; Hu, A.; Yavuz, M.; Zhou, Y.N. Silver Nanoparticle Paste for Low-Temperature Bonding of Copper. J. Electron. Mater. 2011, 40, 1394–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hultgren, R.; Desai, P.D.; Hawkins, D.T.; Gleiser, M.; Kelley, K. Selected Values of the Thermodynamic Properties of Binary Alloys; American Society for Metals: Metals Park, OH, USA, 1973. [Google Scholar]
  31. Pearson, W.B. Handbook of Lattice Spacings and Structures of Metals and Alloys; Pergamon: Oxford, UK, 1967. [Google Scholar]
  32. Pauling, L. The Nature of the Chemical Bond, 3rd ed.; Cornell University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1960; p. 93. [Google Scholar]
  33. Bai, J.G.; Lu, G.Q. Thermomechanical Reliability of Low-Temperature Sintered Silver Die Attached SiC Power Device Assembly. IEEE Trans. Device Mater. Reliab. 2006, 6, 436–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Top and (b) side views of the two Cu-cladded PI substrates and the joint in-between, as well as the current stressing direction.
Figure 1. (a) Top and (b) side views of the two Cu-cladded PI substrates and the joint in-between, as well as the current stressing direction.
Nanomaterials 12 04241 g001
Figure 2. Bending experiment schematics: (a) bending apparatus (b) bending radius.
Figure 2. Bending experiment schematics: (a) bending apparatus (b) bending radius.
Nanomaterials 12 04241 g002
Figure 3. (a) TEM image and (b) diffraction patterns of Ag NPs, as well as (c) UV-vis spectrum.
Figure 3. (a) TEM image and (b) diffraction patterns of Ag NPs, as well as (c) UV-vis spectrum.
Nanomaterials 12 04241 g003aNanomaterials 12 04241 g003b
Figure 4. SEM image of spray pyrolyzed submicron Ag particles.
Figure 4. SEM image of spray pyrolyzed submicron Ag particles.
Nanomaterials 12 04241 g004
Figure 5. SRXRD patterns of LNCP subjected to isothermal heating at 160 °C for 20 or 30 min.
Figure 5. SRXRD patterns of LNCP subjected to isothermal heating at 160 °C for 20 or 30 min.
Nanomaterials 12 04241 g005
Figure 6. FT-IR spectra: (a) PVP (red) and Ag-6CO12 (blue) nanoparticles and (b) 6C-LNCP (red) and 6C-LNCP (black) after sintering.
Figure 6. FT-IR spectra: (a) PVP (red) and Ag-6CO12 (blue) nanoparticles and (b) 6C-LNCP (red) and 6C-LNCP (black) after sintering.
Nanomaterials 12 04241 g006
Figure 7. Shear strength of LNCP-6C joints with Cu, Ni/Au and Ag substrates, respectively (EC: ethyl cellulose).
Figure 7. Shear strength of LNCP-6C joints with Cu, Ni/Au and Ag substrates, respectively (EC: ethyl cellulose).
Nanomaterials 12 04241 g007
Figure 8. Comparison of strengths of joints bonded using NP pastes.
Figure 8. Comparison of strengths of joints bonded using NP pastes.
Nanomaterials 12 04241 g008
Figure 9. Cross-sectional LNCP(EC) joint microstructure with different substrates: (a,b) Cu, (c,d) Ni/Au and (e,f) Ag.
Figure 9. Cross-sectional LNCP(EC) joint microstructure with different substrates: (a,b) Cu, (c,d) Ni/Au and (e,f) Ag.
Nanomaterials 12 04241 g009
Figure 10. Cross-sectional LNCP(EC)/Cu joint microstructure from another location of the LNCP(EC)/Cu substrate joint (segregated Cu regions are indicated).
Figure 10. Cross-sectional LNCP(EC)/Cu joint microstructure from another location of the LNCP(EC)/Cu substrate joint (segregated Cu regions are indicated).
Nanomaterials 12 04241 g010
Figure 11. The relationship between the number of bends for test pieces and their respective electrical resistivity: (a) PI/Cu, and (b) PI/Cu/Ag.
Figure 11. The relationship between the number of bends for test pieces and their respective electrical resistivity: (a) PI/Cu, and (b) PI/Cu/Ag.
Nanomaterials 12 04241 g011
Figure 12. The relationship between the number of thermal cycles and respective electrical resistivity of the joints: (a) PI/Cu, and (b) PI/Cu/Ag (TCT: thermal cycling test).
Figure 12. The relationship between the number of thermal cycles and respective electrical resistivity of the joints: (a) PI/Cu, and (b) PI/Cu/Ag (TCT: thermal cycling test).
Nanomaterials 12 04241 g012
Figure 13. The relationship between applied current and the electrical resistivity of the joints with Cu substrate.
Figure 13. The relationship between applied current and the electrical resistivity of the joints with Cu substrate.
Nanomaterials 12 04241 g013
Table 1. Processing conditions for bonding.
Table 1. Processing conditions for bonding.
Bonding MaterialsBonding Condition
Temporary BondingMain Bonding
TemperaturePressureTimeTemperaturePressureTime
6C-LNCP
6C-LNCP (EC)
70 °C10 MPa600 s160 °C1.6, 10 MPa1200 s
ACF80 ± 10 °C1 MPa5 s185 ± 10 °C2 MPa20 s
Silicone paste Moisture2 MPa12 h
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lu, Y.-C.; Liao, W.-H.; Wu, T.-J.; Yasuda, K.; Song, J.-M. Cu-Ag Nanocomposite Pastes for Low Temperature Bonding and Flexible Interlayer-Interconnections. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 4241. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12234241

AMA Style

Lu Y-C, Liao W-H, Wu T-J, Yasuda K, Song J-M. Cu-Ag Nanocomposite Pastes for Low Temperature Bonding and Flexible Interlayer-Interconnections. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(23):4241. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12234241

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lu, Yin-Chi, Wei-Hsun Liao, Ting-Jui Wu, Kiyokazu Yasuda, and Jenn-Ming Song. 2022. "Cu-Ag Nanocomposite Pastes for Low Temperature Bonding and Flexible Interlayer-Interconnections" Nanomaterials 12, no. 23: 4241. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12234241

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop