Next Article in Journal
Nanocomposite Hydrogels Containing Few-Layer Graphene Sheets Prepared through Noncovalent Exfoliation Show Improved Mechanical Properties
Next Article in Special Issue
The Photocatalytic Activity of CaTiO3 Derived from the Microwave-Melting Heating Process of Blast Furnace Slag
Previous Article in Journal
Biologically Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles and Their Diverse Applications
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 12
Issue 18
10.3390/nano12183130
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Natural Cotton Cellulose-Supported TiO2 Quantum Dots for the Highly Efficient Photocatalytic Degradation of Dyes

by
Hancheng Shen
,
Weiwei Zhang
,
Chunyun Guo
,
Jing Zhu
*,
Junjie Cui
,
Zhonghua Xue
* and
Peirong Chen
*
Department of Applied Chemistry, School of Science, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(18), 3130; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12183130
Submission received: 2 August 2022 / Revised: 24 August 2022 / Accepted: 6 September 2022 / Published: 9 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Photocatalytic Nanomaterials in Water Decontamination)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The artificial photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants has emerged as a promising approach to purifying the water environment. The core issue of this ongoing research is to construct efficient but easily recyclable photocatalysts without quadratic harm. Here, we report an eco-friendly photocatalyst with in situ generated TiO2 quantum dots (TQDs) on natural cotton cellulose (CC) by a simple one-step hydrothermal method. The porous fine structure and abundant hydroxyl groups control the shape growth and improve the stability of nanoparticles, making natural CC suitable for TQDs. The TQDs/CC photocatalyst was synthesized without the chemical modification of the TQDs. FE-SEM and TEM results showed that 5–6 nm TQDs are uniformly decorated on the CC surface. The long-term stability in photocatalytic activity and structure of more than ten cycles directly demonstrates the stability of CC on TQDs. With larger CC sizes, TQDs are easier to recycle. The TQDs/CC photocatalysts show impressive potential in the photocatalytic degradation of anionic methyl orange (MO) dyes and cationic rhodamine B (RhB) dyes.

1. Introduction

Over the past few decades, the rapid development of modern industries worldwide has led to a severe cascade of problems in the water environment and human health [1,2,3]. Organic dyes, such as rhodamine B (RhB) and methyl orange (MO), are bulk and commonly used chemicals in the textile and apparel industries that are lost in a large portion (~20%) during the synthesis and manufacturing processes and are discharged into the water [4,5]. These colored dyes in wastewaters are poisonous and detrimental to human beings and prove challenging to degrade due to their high structural stability and low biodegradability [6,7,8]. Therefore, removing the dyes from wastewater is substantially vital for the development of a more environmentally sustainable earth. To this end, various technologies have been developed, including biological degradation [9,10], flocculation [11], adsorption [12,13], advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) [14], and membrane separation [15], which somewhat suffer from inert kinetics, complicated processes, high cost, and low efficiency.
Photocatalytic oxidation is one of the AOPs that has great potential to completely degrade a wide range of organic dyes by using solar energy [16,17]. To date, TiO2 has been widely used as an inexpensive and efficient semiconducting photocatalyst for the oxidative degradation of dyes, attributing to its ideal properties such as wide tunable bandgap (~3.2 eV), high stability, and ease of availability; however, its photocatalytic activity is still plagued by the sluggish separation of charge carriers and limited surface-active centers [18,19,20]. In this regard, the shape controlling of TiO2 crystals into a nano-size can elevate the photocatalytic capacity by affording more active sites from the unit mass [21]. For example, TiO2 quantum dots (TQDs) generally show enhanced photocatalytic activity compared to bulk TiO2 because of both size effect and optimized band structures [22,23]. Nonetheless, TQDs are rather prone to agglomerate and lack sufficient reusability, thus reducing their final photocatalytic performance and real-world application value [24]. On the other hand, it has become a new trend to use recycled materials to support photocatalyst powders. As a result, an effective approach to developing supported TQDs that govern their activity is highly needed.
Cotton cellulose (CC) is the most important renewable biopolymer used in a range of applications from the textile industry to medical, accounting for about 35% of the world’s total annual cellulose demands [25,26]. CC is an ideal support for photocatalysts because of its superfine porous structure and rich hydroxyl groups [27]. The superfine structure and rich hydroxyl groups not only provide support but also help to control particle shape growth and enhance particle stability by providing a template surface [28,29]. Yu et al. reported a one-pot synthesis route to fabricate CNC/ZnO nanohybrids, which homogeneously dispersed ZnO nanoparticles anchored onto the cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) surface [30]. ZnO nanoparticles were uniformly distributed on CNC with an average diameter of 42.6 nm. Furthermore, using CC as a supporting photocatalyst overcomes the shortcomings of difficulty in the collection and removal of photocatalysts in water. Using micron-size CC as the carrier for TQDs makes the recycling of TQDs more simply.
Herein, we present the preparation of TQDs grown in situ on CC biopolymer as an efficient and stable photocatalyst (TQDs/CC) for the photodegradation of organic dyes. The CC serves as a natural and green biopolymer support to stabilize the TQDs, triggering increased activity and significantly improved photocatalyst reusability [31,32]. FE-SEM and TEM confirm the formation of 5–6 nm TQDs on the CC surface. The photocatalytic activity of TQDs/CC remained unchanged after ten cyclic photocatalytic degradation tests, and EDX mapping shows that TQDs still decorated on the CC surface. The results demonstrate that TQDs/CC has great application potential in the photocatalytic rapid decomposition of different types of dyes, such as anionic MO dyes and cationic RhB dyes.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

Cotton cellulose (CC) was obtained from Haishihainuo Bosswin Medical Treatment Articles Co., Ltd. (Qingdao, China). Tetrabutyl titanate (TBOT, 98%) was purchased from Tianjin Kermel Reagent Co., Ltd. (Tianjin, China). Nitric acid (HNO3, 65–68%) and anhydrous ethanol (C2H5OH, 99.7%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Tianjin, China). Methyl orange (MO) and rhodamine B (RhB) were acquired from Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). All reagents and materials were directly used without further purification. Deionized water was used in all experiments.

2.2. Preparation of TQDs/CC Photocatalyst

TQDs/CC photocatalyst was synthesized by a hydrothermal method. Typically, 0.5 g clean CC, 1 mL HNO3, and 15 mL deionized water were mixed and stirred thoroughly to obtain solution A. Solution B was 15 mL ethanol containing a certain amount of TBOT. Solutions A and B were mixed and stirred for 20 min to obtain the precursor solution. Subsequently, the precursor solution was heated at 180 °C for 10 h in a Teflon-lined autoclave. After cooling naturally, the product was washed with ethanol several times and then dried to obtain TQDs/CC-x samples, where “x” represents the grams of TBOT.

2.3. Characterization

Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) and corresponding energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) images were taken from a Hitachi S-4800 scanning electron microscope (Hitachi Inc., Tokyo, Japan). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), high-resolution TEM (HR-TEM) observations and selected area electron diffraction patterns (SAED) were performed over an FEI Tecnai F20 microscope (FEI Inc., Hillsboro, OR, USA). Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were recorded by a Nicolette IS50 instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were taken on a Bruker D8 Advance X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å) (Bruker Inc., Karlsruhe, Germany). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) results were obtained using a Thermo Scientific k-alpha spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) with an operating voltage of 12 kV and Al Kα X-ray radiation (hʋ = 1486.6 eV). Then, UV-vis diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS) were used to study the optical properties of the samples with a Shimadzu UV-3600i Plus UV-vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Inc., Kyoto, Japan), using BaSO4 as a reflectance standard.

2.4. Photocatalytic Measurements

MO and RhB are typical anionic and cationic dyes, respectively. The 10 mg/L MO or RhB in water was used as a simulated dye pollutant solution. The photocatalytic performances of the samples were performed under UV light of 254 nm irradiated by a 30 W low-pressure mercury lamp. Typically, 50 mg of the dried samples were added to 25 mL of MO or RhB solution. The suspension was stirred in the dark or under UV irradiation for 0.5 h to realize adsorption-desorption equilibrium. Afterward, 5 mL of suspension was taken out every 0.5 h and centrifuged for 3 min. The absorbance of MO and RhB dye were measured under 465 and 554 nm, respectively. The photodegradation efficiency of the catalyst was calculated by using the following equation: X% = C/C0 × 100%, where X% is the photodegradation efficiency, C0 is the initial concentration of the dye, and C is the concentration of dye after the photocatalytic experiment.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Preparation of TQDs/CC Photocatalyst

Figure 1 shows the in-situ synthesis of the TQDs/CC photocatalyst by directly depositing TQDs onto the natural CC via a hydrothermal process. In detail, TBOT was hydrolyzed in ethanol to generate titanium hydroxide (real reaction process: Ti(C4H9O)4 + 4H2O → Ti(OH)4 + 4C4H9OH), which decomposed into TQDs with the existence of HNO3 under high temperature and pressure (Ti(OH)4 → TiO2⋅nH2O → TQDs) [33,34]. The as-formed TQDs were chemically absorbed with the hydroxyl group of CC by hydrogen bonding and were further stacked layer-by-layer through the van der Waals forces, thus assembling a thick layer of TQDs on the surface of CC [28,35]. It has been reported that TiO2 is coated with amino groups and then adheres to cotton fibers through hydrogen bonding under heat treatment [36]. Our work, in contrast, deposited TiO2 quantum dots directly onto cotton cellulose through hydrogen bonding or van der Waals forces without TiO2 chemical modification in a one-step hydrothermal method.

3.2. Characterizations of TQDs/CC Photocatalyst

The morphology and structural characteristics of CC support and TQDs/CC photocatalyst were investigated by FE-SEM. Figure S1 presents that TQDs/CC photocatalyst, like CC, consists of fibers with several hundred micrometers in length and an average diameter of about 12–13 μm. From FE-SEM images with higher magnification, it can be found that the surface of CC is relatively smooth (Figure 2a), and there are many holes in CC itself (Figure 2b). The surface of CC changes from smooth to rough, coated with dense nanoparticles (Figure 2c,d) after the hydrothermal process, and the holes are no longer observed, indicating the successful deposition of TQDs onto the surface of CC. A clear interface between TQDs and CC support can be observed in Figure 2e. As illustrated in Figure 2e, the porous fine structure of CC provides conditions for the growth of the TQDs layer. The corresponding elemental analysis by SEM-EDX (Figure 2f) further verifies that C, O, and Ti are the main constituent elements for the TQDs/CC sample. The sample was dispersed in water and sonicated for 2 h by using an ultrasound cleaning bath. The effect of ultrasound treatment is due to acoustic cavitation, which provides unique physical effects based on mechanical effects such as shear forces, microjets, and shock waves [37]. Thus, these extreme reaction conditions would result in the exfoliation of TQDs from CC. Furthermore, SEM-EDX mapping results (Figure 2(g1–g4)) indicate substantial quantities of residues of TQDs on the CC surface after an ultrasonic treatment for more than 2 h, unambiguously demonstrating the high chemical and physical stability of the TQDs/CC photocatalyst.
To investigate the more detailed structure of the TQDs/CC photocatalyst, the TEM images are shown in Figure 3. Figure 3a reveals that the thickness of the TQDs layer is about 123 nm, and TQDs are firmly attached to the CC. Figure 3b and d display that the particle size of TQDs ranged from 3 to 8 nm. The crystal lattice fringes of circled TQDs in Figure 3b with a spacing of 0.35, 0.24, and 0.19 nm correspond to the (101), (004), and (200) planes of anatase TiO2, respectively [38]. The SAED of the TQDs/CC photocatalyst (Figure 3c), same as HR-TEM, shows the sharp diffraction rings of anatase TiO2, in which the diffraction rings are attributed to (101), (004), (200), and (105) of anatase TiO2, respectively [39,40]. No diffraction ring of CC appears in the SAED of TQDs/CC photocatalyst, which proves that the CC surface is covered with a thick layer of TQDs.
The FT-IR spectra of CC and the TQDs/CC photocatalyst are shown in Figure 4a. Broad bands of 3000–3800 cm−1 are assigned to the stretching vibration of the O-H bond of the hydroxyl, while the characteristic peak observed at 2904 cm−1 shows C-H in the cotton structure [41]. In the FT-IR spectra, the peaks of 1166 and 1063 cm−1 correspond to C-O-C and C-OH, respectively. The band at 1634 cm−1 is related to the bending mode of the water [42]. Furthermore, compared with CC, the C-H, C-O-C, and C-OH, the intensity peaks of the TQDs/CC photocatalyst were significantly weakened, indicating the presence of TQDs on the surface of CC. Meanwhile, FT-IR broad bands of TQDs/CC photocatalyst at 500–800 cm−1, corresponding to the stretching vibration of the Ti-O-Ti (Figure S2), suggests the possibility of interactions between the TQDs and CC [43,44]. This result indicates the successful formation of the TQDs/CC photocatalyst.
CC and TQDs/CC photocatalyst crystal phases were analyzed by XRD. As shown in Figure 4b. The XRD pattern of CC, same as the TQDs/CC photocatalyst, shows four typical peaks at 2θ = 14.9°, 16.5°, 22.6°, and 34.3° corresponding to the diffraction planes (1 1 ¯ 0), (110), (200), and (004) of cellulose Iβ, respectively (JSPDS No. 56-1718) [45,46]. However, the diffraction peak intensity of (200) matched to CC in the TQDs/CC photocatalyst decreases sharply due to the existence of TQDs. The XRD pattern shows the diffraction peaks at 25.4°, 37.9°, 48.2°, 54.5°, and 62.8° of TQDs/CC photocatalyst correspond to (101), (004), (200), (105), and (204) of anatase TiO2 diffraction planes, respectively, are well-matched to JCPDS data (No. 21-1272) [22,47]. In addition, the grain size of TQDs is calculated to be about 6 nm according to the HR-TEM by using Scherer’s formula, as shown in equation: D = 0.90λ/Bcosθ [48], where λ is the X-ray wavelength, B is the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the most intense peak, θ is the Bragg angle, and D is crystal size.
The XPS shown in Figure 4c–f aims to characterize the chemical composition of the TQDs/CC photocatalyst. Figure 4c reveals three characteristic elemental peaks of C 1s, O 1s, and Ti 2p in wide-scan XPS spectra [22,49,50]. The high-resolution XPS spectrum of C 1s presents three fitting peaks at 284.8, 286.5, and 288.5 eV (Figure 4b), corresponding to C-C, C-OH, and C-O, respectively [51,52]. The three relevant fitting peaks of the O 1s XPS spectrum at 529.9, 531.4, and 532.8 eV presented Ti-O, C-O-C, and O-O, respectively (Figure 4c) [53]. It should be noted that the peak near 532.8 eV is related to oxygen, which may be related to O2 adsorbed on the sample surface. In Figure 4f, two fitting peaks at 458.6 and 464.3 eV are assigned to Ti4+ 2p3/2 and Ti4+ 2p1/2, respectively, indicating the presence of TiO2 [54,55].

3.3. Photocatalytic Property of TQDs/CC Photocatalyst

The photocatalytic behavior of different TQDs/CC photocatalysts was examined using anion MO dye and cationic RhB dye under UV light conditions. Without adding any catalyst, the concentrations of MO and RhB are basically unchanged. Different TQDs/CC photocatalysts were prepared by adding TBOT at 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.5 g. Figure S3a,b show the absorbance changes in UV-vis absorption spectra of MO and RhB under different TQDs/CC photocatalysis at 0–120 min. UV-vis spectra and corresponding experimental images display MO and RhB gradually fading with increasing illumination time, which demonstrates the TQDs/CC photocatalyst destroyed the chemical structure of dyes [56]. What’s more, the absorbance of dyes decreases gradually with the increase in TBOT after the same exposure time. That is to say, the removal rate of MO and RhB gradually improves with the increase in TBOT (Figure 5a,b), which means that more TBOT leads to the formation of thicker TQD layers to further improve the photocatalytic performance. It is expected that TQDs/CC-2.5 has the best photocatalytic activity for MO and RhB. The removal rate for MO and RhB degraded by TQDs/CC-2.5 is close to 100% after 90 min, indicating that MO and RhB are removed.
Interestingly, Figure 5b portrays that RhB concentration decreased by about 40% in the CC control group before the photodegradation began, while the concentration decrease is slighter in the other groups. The result indicates that CC, rich in hydroxyl and with a porous structure, easily absorbs cationic organic dyes [57]. However, due to TQDs occupying the surface of the CC, the adsorption capacity of the TQDs/CC photocatalyst is inferior to that of CC. Under subsequent light conditions, the as-synthesized photocatalyst rapidly degraded RhB, while the control group remained essentially unchanged. This result suggests that TQDs accelerate the degradation of cationic organic dyes.
To study the kinetics of the photocatalytic removal for MO and RhB by the TQDs/CC photocatalyst, the pseudo-first-order model was used, the equation is −ln(C/C0) = kt [58], where C and C0 are concentrations of MO or RhB at times 0 and t, respectively. The k value is the pseudo-first-order reaction constant rate. Figure 5c,d reveal pseudo-first-order kinetic fitting linear curves of photocatalytic degradation for MO and RhB by different TQDs/CC. The correlation coefficients and the kinetic constants are shown in Table S1. According to the k value, TQDs/CC-2.5 has the highest photocatalytic activity and its degradation rate constants for MO and RhB reach up to 0.0373 and 0.0273 min−1, respectively.

3.4. Reusability and Stability of TQDs/CC Photocatalyst

The reusability and stability of the as-synthesized photocatalyst were tested by degradation for MO using the TQDs/CC-2.5 photocatalyst. The TQDs/CC-2.5 photocatalyst was cleaned with deionized water and dried before each photodegradation experiment. Figure 6 shows the recycle test of the TQDs/CC-2.5 photocatalyst. The result indicates that the photocatalytic efficiency of the TQDs/CC-2.5 photocatalyst is not less than 95% after repeated photodegradation tests for ten cycles, indicating that the TQDs/CC-2.5 has high photocatalytic stability and excellent reusability. As shown in Figure 7(a1,b1,c1), the basic structure of TQDs/CC-2.5 is not damaged after repeated photodegradation for MO above ten cycles. Figure 7(b2–b4) shows C, O, and Ti SEM-EDX mapping results of TQDs/CC-2.5 after recycling tests for five cycles, while Figure 7(c2–c4) corresponds to recycling tests after ten times. Compared to the SEM-EDX mapping of TQDs/CC-2.5 without photocatalytic response (Figure 7(a2–a4)), TQDs firmly remain on the CC surface after five and ten cycles of recycling tests of TQDs/CC-2.5. The photocatalytic activity of the TQDs/CC photocatalyst remained unchanged after more than ten long-term recycling tests, which proved that CC highly stabilized the TQDs. Moreover, it can be inferred that some outermost TQDs are detached from the TQDs/CC during the photodegradation test, and TQDs in the inner further continue to play a role in degrading MO.

3.5. Hypothesis of Photodegradation Mechanism

To better understand the photodegradation of organic dyes by the TQDs/CC photocatalyst, exploring the mechanism of the photocatalytic activity of the TQDs/CC photocatalyst has been probed. UV-vis DRS spectra were applied to study the optical properties of commercial anatase TiO2 and the TQDs/CC-2.5 photocatalyst. The UV-vis DRS spectrum of the TQDs/CC-2.5 photocatalyst gives slight rise to a red shift and the appearance of visible light absorbance in comparison with commercial TiO2 in Figure 8a [21]. The band gaps are computed according to the Kubelka–Munk function [59]. As the Kubelka–Munk plots show (Figure 8b), the band gap determined for anatase TiO2 is 3.25 eV, while for the TQDs/CC-2.5 photocatalyst it is reduced down to 3.17 eV.
Here, a possible photodegradation mechanism is proposed. Figure 9 shows the catalytic degradation process for MO and RhB by the TQDs/CC photocatalyst. CC containing a large number of hydroxyl groups adsorb organic pollutants from wastewater, like MO or RhB, through coordination or hydrogen bonding [32,57,60]. Meanwhile, the more reactive sites and the narrower band gap of the TQDs/CC photocatalyst compared to commercial TiO2 provides the possibility of improving the photocatalytic activity in the visible light region. Under UV light, electrons of TQDs are transferred from the valence band (VB) to the conduction band (CB), generating electron (e−) -hole pairs (h+) [61]. In the photocatalytic process, O2 is reduced to the superoxide radical anion (O2−) by electrons (e−), and the hydroxyl radicals (OH·) formed due to the reaction of the strongly oxidizing photogenerated holes (h+) with water [17,62]. O2−, OH·, or h+ further oxidize MO or RhB into small molecules such as H2O and CO2 without producing toxic and harmful intermediates.

4. Conclusions

In summary, the TQDs/CC photocatalyst was prepared with a simple one-step hydrothermal method. As the cotton matrix is a natural biopolymer, the TQDs/CC photocatalyst is eco-friendly and pollution-free while improving the recovery and utilization of TiO2. SEM, EDX, TEM, FT-IR, XRD, and XPS were used to verify that the TQDs were decorated on the CC and formed a relatively uniform TQDs layer. Because CC is rich in hydroxyl and has a porous structure, the TQDs/CC photocatalyst has high adsorption and photo-oxidation properties of dyes. The removal rate of anionic MO dye or cationic RhB dye by the best-in-class TQDs/CC-2.5 photocatalyst is still close to 100% after ten cycles of photodegradation, exhibiting an impressive catalyst life. In addition, the structure of TQDs/CC-2.5 is studied by SEM-EDX mapping after ten cycles of photocatalytic stability experiments, which proved that the TQDs/CC photocatalyst has high chemical and physical stability. Such structural characteristics ensure that the loss of TQDs caused by the spalling of TQDs from the CC surface can be avoided when the TQDs/CC photocatalyst is reused. The long-term stability of TQDs/CC in activity and structure directly proves its great application potential in the photodegradation of different types of dyes.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano12183130/s1, Figure S1: SEM images for CC (a) and TQDs/CC sample (b), respectively; Figure S2: FT-IR spectrum of commercial anatase TiO2; Figure S3: UV-vis curve for MO (a) and RhB (b) under different TQDs/CC sample photodegradation; Table S1: Correlation coefficient and kinetic constants of MO and RhB photodegradation.

Author Contributions

H.S.: Methodology, formal analysis, writing—original draft. W.Z.: Formal analysis, writing—original draft. C.G.: Formal analysis, investigation. J.Z.: Conceptualization, supervision. J.C.: Methodology, validation. Z.X.: Conceptualization, funding acquisition, supervision. P.C.: Conceptualization, writing—review & editing, supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (51702004, and 22105002), Anhui Agricultural University (rc382003), the Open Fund of State Key Laboratory of Tea Plant Biology and Utilization (No.SKLTOF20190119), Innovation and Entrepreneurship Plan for College Students, National scientific research project (S202010364087), the Dalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy (DNL), CAS, DNL Cooperation Fund, CAS (DNL180402), State Key Laboratory of Catalysis (N-21-12) and the Open Fund of The State Key Laboratory of Molecular Reaction Dynamics in DICP, CAS, China.

Data Availability Statement

All data supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Escher, B.I.; Stapleton, H.M.; Schymanski, E.L. Tracking complex mixtures of chemicals in our changing environment. Science 2020, 367, 388–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Mohamed, W.; El-Gawad, H.A.; Handal, H.; Galal, H.; Mousa, H.; El-Sayed, B.; Mekkey, S.; Ibrahem, I.; Labib, A. Remarkable recycling process of ZnO quantum dots for photodegradation of reactive yellow dye and solar photocatalytic treatment process of industrial wastewater. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Chen, S.; Jiang, D.; Zeng, G.; Chi, H.; Li, L.; He, Y.; Ke, F.; Xiao, J.-D.; Ye, S. Dysprosium doped CoFe2O4 with enhanced magnetic property and photodegradation activity of methyl orange. Mater. Lett. 2021, 284, 128966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Khatri, A.; Peerzada, M.H.; Mohsin, M.; White, M. A review on developments in dyeing cotton fabrics with reactive dyes for reducing effluent pollution. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 87, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mora, S.L.; Cadavid, Y.; Ch, E.M.C.; Vélez, J.M.; Buitrago-Sierra, R.; Santa, J.F. Plantain fibers obtained from pseudostems residues for efficient color degradation of indigo carmine dye. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 126, 302–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xue, Z.H.; Luan, D.; Zhang, H.; Lou, X.W. Single-atom catalysts for photocatalytic energy conversion. Joule 2022, 6, 92–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Khan, F.S.A.; Mubarak, N.M.; Tan, Y.H.; Khalid, M.; Karri, R.R.; Walvekar, R.; Abdullah, E.C.; Nizamuddin, S.; Mazari, S.A. A comprehensive review on magnetic carbon nanotubes and carbon nanotube-based buckypaper for removal of heavy metals and dyes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 413, 125375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, S.; Cai, M.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wang, C.; Zang, S.; Li, Y.; Zhang, P.; Li, X. In situ construction of a C3N5 nanosheet/Bi2WO6 nanodot S-scheme heterojunction with enhanced structural defects for the efficient photocatalytic removal of tetracycline and Cr(VI). Inorg. Chem. Front. 2022, 9, 2479–2497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rasheed, T.; Bilal, M.; Nabeel, F.; Adeel, M.; Iqbal, H.M.N. Environmentally-related contaminants of high concern: Potential sources and analytical modalities for detection, quantification, and treatment. Environ. Int. 2019, 122, 52–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nie, J.; Sun, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Kumar, M.; Usman, M.; Li, J.; Shao, J.; Wang, L.; Tsang, D.C.W. Bioremediation of water containing pesticides by microalgae: Mechanisms, methods, and prospects for future research. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 707, 136080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Saravanan, A.; Kumar, P.S.; Jeevanantham, S.; Karishma, S.; Tajsabreen, B.; Yaashikaa, P.R.; Reshma, B. Effective water/wastewater treatment methodologies for toxic pollutants removal: Processes and applications towards sustainable development. Chemosphere 2021, 280, 130595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, T.; Wang, W.; Zhao, Y.; Bai, H.; Wen, T.; Kang, S.; Song, G.; Song, S.; Komarneni, S. Removal of heavy metals and dyes by clay-based adsorbents: From natural clays to 1D and 2D nano-composites. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 420, 127574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dey, P.; Mahapatra, B.S.; Juyal, V.K.; Pramanick, B.; Negi, M.S.; Paul, J.; Singh, S.P. Flax processing waste–A low-cost, potential biosorbent for treatment of heavy metal, dye and organic matter contaminated industrial wastewater. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 174, 114195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dekkouche, S.; Morales-Torres, S.; Ribeiro, A.R.; Faria, J.L.; Fontàs, C.; Kebiche-Senhadji, O.; Silva, A.M.T. In situ growth and crystallization of TiO2 on polymeric membranes for the photocatalytic degradation of diclofenac and 17α-ethinylestradiol. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 427, 131476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, N.; Lu, X.; He, M.; Duan, X.; Yan, B.; Chen, G.; Wang, S. Catalytic membrane-based oxidation-filtration systems for organic wastewater purification: A review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 414, 125478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jiang, M.; Zhang, M.; Wang, L.; Fei, Y.; Wang, S.; Núñez-Delgado, A.; Bokhari, A.; Race, M.; Khataee, A.; Klemeš, J.J.; et al. Photocatalytic degradation of xanthate in flotation plant tailings by TiO2/graphene nanocomposites. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 431, 134104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xiong, L.; Tang, J. Strategies and challenges on selectivity of photocatalytic oxidation of organic substances. Adv. Energy Mater. 2021, 11, 2003216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Karpuraranjith, M.; Chen, Y.; Rajaboopathi, S.; Ramadoss, M.; Srinivas, K.; Yang, D.; Wang, B. Three-dimensional porous MoS2 nanobox embedded g-C3N4@TiO2 architecture for highly efficient photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutant. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 605, 613–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yu, Y.; Zhu, X.; Wang, L.; Wu, F.; Liu, S.; Chang, C.; Luo, X. A simple strategy to design 3-layered Au-TiO2 dual nanoparticles immobilized cellulose membranes with enhanced photocatalytic activity. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 231, 115694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Singh, J.; Juneja, S.; Soni, R.K.; Bhattacharya, J. Sunlight mediated enhanced photocatalytic activity of TiO2 nanoparticles functionalized CuO-Cu2O nanorods for removal of methylene blue and oxytetracycline hydrochloride. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 590, 60–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Wang, S.; Lin, S.; Zhang, D.; Li, G.; Leung, M.K.H. Controlling charge transfer in quantum-size titania for photocatalytic applications. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 215, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, X.; Xia, R.; Muhire, E.; Jiang, S.; Huo, X.; Gao, M. Highly enhanced photocatalytic performance of TiO2 nanosheets through constructing TiO2/TiO2 quantum dots homojunction. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 459, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wu, Z.G.; Ren, Z.M.; Li, L.; Lv, L.; Chen, Z. Hydrothermal synthesis of TiO2 quantum dots with mixed titanium precursors. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 251, 117328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ng, H.K.M.; Leo, C.P. The coherence between TiO2 nanoparticles and microfibrillated cellulose in thin film for enhanced dispersal and photodegradation of dye. Prog. Org. Coat. 2019, 132, 70–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wei, X.; Li, J.; Wang, S.; Zhao, Y.; Duan, H.; Ge, X. Fiber-specific overexpression of GhACO1 driven by E6 promoter improves cotton fiber quality and yield. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 185, 115134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Huang, G.; Huang, J.Q.; Chen, X.Y.; Zhu, Y.X. Recent advances and future perspectives in cotton research. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2021, 72, 437–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ghasemzadeh, B.; Matin, A.A.; Habibi, B.; Ebadi, M. Cotton/Fe3O4@SiO2@H3PW12O40 a magnetic heterogeneous catalyst for biodiesel production: Process optimization through response surface methodology. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 181, 114806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mohamed, M.A.; Salleh, W.W.; Jaafar, J.; Ismail, A.; Mutalib, M.A.; Sani, N.; Asri, S.E.; Ong, C. Physicochemical characteristic of regenerated cellulose/N-doped TiO2 nanocomposite membrane fabricated from recycled newspaper with photocatalytic activity under UV and visible light irradiation. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 284, 202–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mohamed, M.A.; Abd Mutalib, M.; Hir, Z.A.M.; Zain, M.M.; Mohamad, A.B.; Minggu, L.J.; Awang, N.A.; Salleh, W.N. An overview on cellulose-based material in tailoring bio-hybrid nanostructured photocatalysts for water treatment and renewable energy applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 103, 1232–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yu, H.Y.; Chen, G.Y.; Wang, Y.B.; Yao, J.M. A facile one-pot route for preparing cellulose nanocrystal/zinc oxide nanohybrids with high antibacterial and photocatalytic activity. Cellulose 2014, 22, 261–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cao, S.; Rathi, P.; Wu, X.; Ghim, D.; Jun, Y.S.; Singamaneni, S. Cellulose nanomaterials in interfacial evaporators for desalination: A “natural” choice. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, e2000922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, R.; Dai, L.; Si, C.L. Mussel-Inspired Cellulose-Based Nanocomposite Fibers for Adsorption and Photocatalytic Degradation. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 15756–15763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, L.; Dong, P.; Liu, R.; Zhou, Q.; Wang, X.; Yi, G.; Cheng, B. Preparation and self-assembly of uniform TiO2/SiO2 composite submicrospheres. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2005, 288, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yu, J.C.C.; Nguyen, V.H.; Lasek, J.; Wu, J.C.S. Titania nanosheet photocatalysts with dominantly exposed (001) reactive facets for photocatalytic NOx abatement. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 219, 391–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Walid, A.; Daoud, S.K.L.; Tung, W.S.; Xin, J.H.; Cheuk, K.; Qi, K. Self-cleaning keratins. Chem. Mater. 2008, 20, 1242–1244. [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhang, G.; Wang, D.; Yan, J.; Xiao, Y.; Gu, W.; Zang, C. Study on the photocatalytic and antibacterial properties of TiO2 nanoparticles-coated cotton fabrics. Materials 2019, 12, 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Abulizi, A.; Okitsu, K.; Zhu, J.J. Ultrasound assisted reduction of graphene oxide to graphene in L-ascorbic acid aqueous solutions: Kinetics and effects of various factors on the rate of graphene formation. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2014, 21, 1174–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chu, S.; Miao, Y.; Qian, Y.; Ke, F.; Chen, P.; Jiang, C.; Chen, X. Synthesis of uniform layer of TiO2 nanoparticles coated on natural cellulose micrometer-sized fibers through a facile one-step solvothermal method. Cellulose 2019, 26, 4757–4765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Joost, U.; Šutka, A.; Oja, M.; Smits, K.; Döbelin, N.; Loot, A.; Järvekülg, M.; Hirsimäki, M.; Valden, M.; Nõmmiste, E. Reversible photodoping of TiO2 nanoparticles for photochromic applications. Chem. Mater. 2018, 30, 8968–8974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liang, Y.C.; Li, T.H. Sputtering-assisted synthesis of copper oxide–titanium oxide nanorods and their photoactive performances. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Onwumere, J.; Tek, J.P.; Budnyak, T.; Chen, J.; Budnyk, S.; Karim, Z.; Thersleff, T.; Kustrowski, P.; Mathew, A.P.; Slabon, A. Celluphot: Hybrid cellulose-bismuth oxybromide membrane for pollutant removal. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 42891–42901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Chen, X.; Sun, H.; Zhang, J.; Zelekew, O.A.; Lu, D.; Kuo, D.-H.; Lin, J. Synthesis of visible light responsive iodine-doped mesoporous TiO2 by using biological renewable lignin as template for degradation of toxic organic pollutants. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 252, 152–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Lyu, Y.; Asoh, T.-A.; Uyama, H. Hierarchically porous TiO2 monolith prepared using a cellulose monolith as a template. Mater. Chem. Front. 2021, 5, 3877–3885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wahid, F.; Zhao, X.Q.; Cui, J.X.; Wang, Y.Y.; Wang, F.P.; Jia, S.R.; Zhong, C. Fabrication of bacterial cellulose with TiO2-ZnO nanocomposites as a multifunctional membrane for water remediation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 620, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Tang, Y.; Yang, S.; Zhang, N.; Zhang, J. Preparation and characterization of nanocrystalline cellulose via low-intensity ultrasonic-assisted sulfuric acid hydrolysis. Cellulose 2013, 21, 335–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yao, L.; Hu, S.; Wang, X.; Lin, M.; Zhang, C.; Chen, Y.; Yue, F.; Qi, H. Facile preparation of lignin-containing cellulose nanofibrils from sugarcane bagasse by mild soda-oxygen pulping. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 290, 119480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Engel, J.; Bishop, S.R.; Vayssieres, L.; Tuller, H.L. In situ electrical characterization of anatase TiO2 quantumdots. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 4952–4958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhang, Y.; Liu, J.X.; Qian, K.; Jia, A.; Li, D.; Shi, L.; Hu, J.; Zhu, J.; Huang, W. Structure sensitivity of Au-TiO2 strong metal-support interactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2021, 60, 12074–12081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. You, X.; Wang, R.; Zhu, Y.; Sui, W.; Cheng, D. Comparison of adsorption properties of a cellulose-rich modified rice husk for the removal of methylene blue and aluminum (III) from their aqueous solution. Ind. Crops Prod. 2021, 170, 113687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Apostolaki, M.A.; Toumazatou, A.; Antoniadou, M.; Sakellis, E.; Xenogiannopoulou, E.; Gardelis, S.; Boukos, N.; Falaras, P.; Dimoulas, A.; Likodimos, V. Graphene quantum dot-TiO2 photonic crystal films for photocatalytic applications. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 2566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zheng, X.; Li, D.; Li, X.; Chen, J.; Cao, C.; Fang, J.; Wang, J.; He, Y.; Zheng, Y. Construction of ZnO/TiO2 photonic crystal heterostructures for enhanced photocatalytic properties. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2015, 168–169, 408–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wang, G.; Wang, F.; Liu, S.; Li, M.; Xie, M.; Yang, Z.; Xiang, Y.; Lv, S.; Han, W. Construction of heterojuncted photocatalyst with TiO2 quantum dots and graphene oxide nanosheets for highly efficient photocatalysis. Scr. Mater. 2021, 199, 113862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhou, S.; Fu, Z.; Xia, L.; Mao, Y.; Zhao, W.; Wang, A.; Zhang, C.; Ding, C.; Xu, W. In situ synthesis of ternary hybrid nanocomposites on natural Juncus effusus fiber for adsorption and photodegradation of organic dyes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 255, 117671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhang, Y.; Wu, M.; Wang, Y.; Kwok, Y.H.; Pan, W.; Szeto, W.; Huang, H.; Leung, D.Y.C. Fluorinated TiO2 coupling with α-MnO2 nanowires supported on different substrates for photocatalytic VOCs abatement under vacuum ultraviolet irradiation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2021, 280, 119388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Xia, Y.; Li, Q.; Lv, K.; Li, M. Heterojunction construction between TiO2 hollowsphere and ZnIn2S4 flower for photocatalysis application. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 398, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhou, S.; Xia, L.; Zhang, K.; Fu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Zhai, L.; Mao, Y.; Xu, W. Titanium dioxide decorated natural cellulosic Juncus effusus fiber for highly efficient photodegradation towards dyes. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 232, 115830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Hokkanen, S.; Bhatnagar, A.; Sillanpaa, M. A review on modification methods to cellulose-based adsorbents to improve adsorption capacity. Water Res. 2016, 91, 156–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ni, J.; Wang, W.; Liu, D.; Zhu, Q.; Jia, J.; Tian, J.; Li, Z.; Wang, X.; Xing, Z. Oxygen vacancy-mediated sandwich-structural TiO2-x/ultrathin g-C3N4/TiO2-x direct Z-scheme heterojunction visible-light-driven photocatalyst for efficient removal of high toxic tetracycline antibiotics. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 408, 124432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Li, S.; Cai, M.; Wang, C.; Liu, Y.; Li, N.; Zhang, P.; Li, X. Rationally designed Ta3N5/BiOCl S-scheme heterojunction with oxygen vacancies for elimination of tetracycline antibiotic and Cr(VI): Performance, toxicity evaluation and mechanism insight. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2022, 123, 177–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Li, Y.; Cao, L.; Li, L.; Yang, C. In situ growing directional spindle TiO2 nanocrystals on cellulose fibers for enhanced Pb(2+) adsorption from water. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 289, 140–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wang, T.; Liu, X.; Men, Q.; Ma, C.; Liu, Y.; Huo, P.; Yan, Y. A Z-scheme TiO2 quantum dots fragment-Bi12TiO20 composites for enhancing photocatalytic activity. Renew. Energ. 2020, 147, 856–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Li, S.; Wang, C.; Cai, M.; Liu, Y.; Dong, K.; Zhang, J. Designing oxygen vacancy mediated bismuth molybdate (Bi2MoO6)/N-rich carbon nitride (C3N5) S-scheme heterojunctions for boosted photocatalytic removal of tetracycline antibiotic and Cr(VI): Intermediate toxicity and mechanism insight. J. Colloid. Interface Sci. 2022, 624, 219–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nanomaterials 12 03130 g001 550
Figure 1. Synthetic process of TQDs/CC photocatalyst.
Figure 1. Synthetic process of TQDs/CC photocatalyst.
Nanomaterials 12 03130 g001
Nanomaterials 12 03130 g002 550
Figure 2. (a,b) SEM images of CC. (c–e) SEM images and corresponding elemental analysis (f) and SEM-EDX mapping results after an ultrasonic treatment (g1–g4) of the TQDs/CC-2.5 sample.
Figure 2. (a,b) SEM images of CC. (c–e) SEM images and corresponding elemental analysis (f) and SEM-EDX mapping results after an ultrasonic treatment (g1–g4) of the TQDs/CC-2.5 sample.
Nanomaterials 12 03130 g002
Nanomaterials 12 03130 g003 550
Figure 3. TEM (a), HR-TEM (b), SAED (c) images, and (d) particle size distribution of TQDs/CC sample.
Figure 3. TEM (a), HR-TEM (b), SAED (c) images, and (d) particle size distribution of TQDs/CC sample.
Nanomaterials 12 03130 g003
Nanomaterials 12 03130 g004 550
Figure 4. (a) FT-IR spectra and (b) XRD patterns of CC and TQDs/CC samples (Triangle represents peaks of cellulose and rhombus represents peaks of anatase TiO2). XPS survey (c), high-resolution C 1s (d), O 1s (e), and Ti 2p (f) XPS spectra of TQDs/CC.
Figure 4. (a) FT-IR spectra and (b) XRD patterns of CC and TQDs/CC samples (Triangle represents peaks of cellulose and rhombus represents peaks of anatase TiO2). XPS survey (c), high-resolution C 1s (d), O 1s (e), and Ti 2p (f) XPS spectra of TQDs/CC.
Nanomaterials 12 03130 g004
Nanomaterials 12 03130 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) Removal rate and pseudo-first-order kinetics curves (c) for MO under different TQDs/CC sample photodegradation. (b) Remove rate and pseudo-first-order kinetics curves (d) for RhB under different TQDs/CC photocatalyst photodegradation.
Figure 5. (a) Removal rate and pseudo-first-order kinetics curves (c) for MO under different TQDs/CC sample photodegradation. (b) Remove rate and pseudo-first-order kinetics curves (d) for RhB under different TQDs/CC photocatalyst photodegradation.
Nanomaterials 12 03130 g005
Nanomaterials 12 03130 g006 550
Figure 6. Recycle tests of TQDs/CC-2.5. The cycles of test increases from left to right, and each colored curve represents the number of cycles.
Figure 6. Recycle tests of TQDs/CC-2.5. The cycles of test increases from left to right, and each colored curve represents the number of cycles.
Nanomaterials 12 03130 g006
Nanomaterials 12 03130 g007 550
Figure 7. SEM and EDX mapping of TQDs/CC-2.5: (a1–a4) without photodegradation; (b1–b4) five recycle tests; (c1–c4) ten recycle tests.
Figure 7. SEM and EDX mapping of TQDs/CC-2.5: (a1–a4) without photodegradation; (b1–b4) five recycle tests; (c1–c4) ten recycle tests.
Nanomaterials 12 03130 g007
Nanomaterials 12 03130 g008 550
Figure 8. (a) UV-vis DRS spectra of TiO2 and TQDs/CC-2.5 photocatalyst and (b) Kubelka–Munk plots as calculated from the DRS spectra.
Figure 8. (a) UV-vis DRS spectra of TiO2 and TQDs/CC-2.5 photocatalyst and (b) Kubelka–Munk plots as calculated from the DRS spectra.
Nanomaterials 12 03130 g008
Nanomaterials 12 03130 g009 550
Figure 9. Photocatalytic degradation of MO or RhB by TQDs/CC photocatalyst.
Figure 9. Photocatalytic degradation of MO or RhB by TQDs/CC photocatalyst.
Nanomaterials 12 03130 g009
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shen, H.; Zhang, W.; Guo, C.; Zhu, J.; Cui, J.; Xue, Z.; Chen, P. Natural Cotton Cellulose-Supported TiO2 Quantum Dots for the Highly Efficient Photocatalytic Degradation of Dyes. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 3130. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12183130

AMA Style

Shen H, Zhang W, Guo C, Zhu J, Cui J, Xue Z, Chen P. Natural Cotton Cellulose-Supported TiO2 Quantum Dots for the Highly Efficient Photocatalytic Degradation of Dyes. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(18):3130. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12183130

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shen, Hancheng, Weiwei Zhang, Chunyun Guo, Jing Zhu, Junjie Cui, Zhonghua Xue, and Peirong Chen. 2022. "Natural Cotton Cellulose-Supported TiO2 Quantum Dots for the Highly Efficient Photocatalytic Degradation of Dyes" Nanomaterials 12, no. 18: 3130. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12183130

APA Style

Shen, H., Zhang, W., Guo, C., Zhu, J., Cui, J., Xue, Z., & Chen, P. (2022). Natural Cotton Cellulose-Supported TiO2 Quantum Dots for the Highly Efficient Photocatalytic Degradation of Dyes. Nanomaterials, 12(18), 3130. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12183130

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop