Next Article in Journal
Photothermal Responsivity of van der Waals Material-Based Nanomechanical Resonators
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Europium Substitution on the Structural, Magnetic and Relaxivity Properties of Mn-Zn Ferrite Nanoparticles: A Dual-Mode MRI Contrast-Agent Candidate
Previous Article in Journal
Recent Advances in Nanoparticle-Based Co-Delivery Systems for Cancer Therapy
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 12
Issue 15
10.3390/nano12152673
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of PEG Chain Length on Relaxometric Properties of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles-Based MRI Contrast Agent

by
Jianxian Ge
1,
Cang Li
1,
Ning Wang
1,
Ruru Zhang
1,
Mohammad Javad Afshari
1,
Can Chen
1,
Dandan Kou
1,
Dandan Zhou
1,
Ling Wen
2,*,
Jianfeng Zeng
1,* and
Mingyuan Gao
1
1
Center for Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, School for Radiological and Interdisciplinary Sciences (RAD-X), Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiological Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China
2
The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(15), 2673; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12152673
Submission received: 2 July 2022 / Revised: 29 July 2022 / Accepted: 2 August 2022 / Published: 4 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanomaterials as Contrast Agents for MRI)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents have received considerable interest due to their superior magnetic properties. To increase the biocompatibility and blood circulation time, polyethylene glycol (PEG) is usually chosen to decorate IONPs. Although the surface effect induced by the PEGylation has an impact on the relaxometric properties of IONPs and can subsequently affect the imaging results, the occurrence of particle aggregation has troubled researchers to deeply explore this correlation. To shed light on this relationship, three diphosphonate PEGs with molecular weights of 1000, 2000, and 5000 Da were used to replace the hydrophobic oleate ligands of 3.6 nm and 10.9 nm IONPs. Then, the contrast enhancement properties of the resultant “aggregation-free” nanoparticles were carefully evaluated. Moreover, related theories were adopted to predict certain properties of IONPs and to compare with the experimental data, as well as obtain profound knowledge about the impacts of the PEG chain length on transverse relaxivity (r2) and longitudinal relaxivity (r1). It was found that r2 and the saturated magnetization of the IONPs, independent of particle size, was closely related to the chain length of PEG. The results unveiled the correlation between the chain length of the coated PEG and the relaxometric properties of IONPs, providing valuable information which might hold great promise in designing optimized, high-performance IONPs for MRI-related applications.

1. Introduction

Owing to their superior magnetic and biocompatible properties, iron oxide nanoparticles (IONPs) have been widely used for biomedical applications such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [1,2,3], drug delivery [1], cell tracking [4,5], and gene therapy [6,7]. In particular, IONPs serve as contrast agents for the MRI, offering noninvasive and real-time manners to visualize the anatomical structure of the body. Therefore, they have received remarkable interest in single-mode MRI [8,9,10], multimodality imaging such as PET/SPECT-MRI [11,12], MRI-CT [13,14], and MRI-optical imaging [15,16], as well as MRI-guided therapy such as MRI-PTT/PDT [17,18] and MRI-chemotherapy [19]. To achieve better MRI diagnosis accuracy, a great number of efforts have been devoted to improve the contrast enhancement effect of IONPs in the last two decades.
As one of the most important parameters of contrast agents, relaxivity provides a valuable measure for evaluating the degree with which the material can highlight the contrast between the tissue of interest and its surrounding areas. Since a higher relaxivity corresponds to a better contrasting capability, a large number of studies were carried out to obtain contrast agents with enhanced relaxivity through tailoring different characteristics of the materials. Thus far, it is well-accepted that the relaxivity of IONPs depends on many factors such as particle size and size distribution [20,21,22], surface properties [23,24,25,26], state of aggregation [10,27,28,29,30], and shape [31,32]. Among the factors mentioned above, the size effect is the most intensively investigated parameter, and a set of size-related criteria was suggested for comprehensive tuning of the relaxivity and pharmacokinetics of IONPs. Moreover, the surface modification of nanoparticles plays an important role in their biomedical applications. Particularly, proper surface modification of IONPs can ensure their colloidal stability as well as capability to effectively escape immunological attacks following administration in blood, resulting in a long blood residence time. To date, many kinds of materials such as DMSA [33], PEG [34,35,36], PVP [37], and silica [38,39] have been employed as the surface coating layer of IONPs for MRI applications, among which PEG has shown undoubted advantages in constructing biocompatible probes. Although some efforts have been made to gain insight into the effect of surface chemistry on the contrast properties of IONPs [24,32,40,41], the influence of surface coating on the relaxivity of the nanoparticles has not been well understood. The particle aggregation, which usually occurs following the surface modification, has troubled researchers to identify the relationship between the relaxometric properties and the surface chemistry of IONPs. In our previous study, taking advantage of PEG derivatives with different anchoring moieties including diphosphonate, catechol, and hydroxamate groups, which have high affinity towards IONPs, the aggregation formation of the nanomaterials was hindered [25]. Additionally, a plausible explanation for the effect of anchoring groups on the relaxivity of IONPs was suggested. However, with respect to the PEG chain length, most of the studies focused on the impacts on the pharmacokinetics and biodistribution [42,43]. The effects on the relaxometric properties of IONPs remained unclear and need to be explored in-depth.
Therefore, the current study was devoted to systematically investigate the effect of surface modification on the relaxivity of IONPs. Building upon our previous study, diphosphonate-PEG (DP-PEG) derivates with different molecular weights were employed to replace the native hydrophobic ligands on 3.6 nm and 10.9 nm-sized IONPs. Due to the strong binding ability of the diphosphonate group to IONPs, two differently sized hydrophilic probes with varying PEG chain length were obtained. The resulting hydrophilic IONPs can individually disperse in aqueous solution, eliminating the disturbance of aggregated nanoparticles as a consequence. Thus, the prepared samples served as great candidates to take part in the investigation of PEG length effect on the relaxometric properties of IONPs, providing valuable information for designing high-performance nano-contrast agents for MRI applications.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Ferric acetylacetonate (Fe(acac)3) was purchased from Sigma–Aldrich and used after two recrystallizations. Diphenyl ether was used after vacuum distillation. Oleic acid, oleylamine, 1-octadecene, and 1-octadecanol were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich and used as received. Other chemicals of analytical grade, including ethanol, ether, cyclohexane, and tetrahydrofuran (THF), were used as received. Diphosphonate PEG (Mw ≈ 1000, 2000, and 5000 Da) with a diphosphonate group at one end of the chain and a methoxy group at the other, were customized products provided by Suzhou Xinying Bio-Medical Technology Co. Ltd. (Suzhou, China) The iron oleate complex was prepared according to a previous report [42].

2.2. Synthesis of Hydrophobic IONPs

IONPs with a core size of 3.6 nm were synthesized according to a previous report, with slight modifications [2]. Typically, 1.41 g (4 mmol) of Fe(acac)3, 3.39 g (12 mmol) of oleic acid, 3.21 g (12 mmol) of oleylamine, and 2.70 g (10 mmol) of 1-octadecanol were dissolved in 40 mL of diphenyl ether. After being purged with nitrogen for 30 min, the solution was refluxed for 30 min under stirring. Then, the reaction system was cooled to room temperature. The resultant nanoparticles were precipitated by ethanol, collected by centrifugation, washed with ethanol three times, and finally, redispersed in THF or cyclohexane for further experiments.
IONPs with a core size of 10.9 nm were also synthesized according to a previous report [1]. In brief, 3.6 g (4 mmol) of freshly prepared iron oleate and 3.39 g (4 mmol) of oleic acid were dissolved in 25 mL of 1-octadecene. The resultant solution was heated to 310 °C at a rate of 3.3 °C/min and then maintained at 310 °C for 30 min under nitrogen protection. The preparation was terminated by cooling the reaction mixture to room temperature. The solution was subjected to the purification steps mentioned above for 3.6 nm nanoparticles and resulted in obtaining 10.9 nm IONPs.

2.3. Ligand Exchange

Typically, 150 mg of PEG derivative was dissolved in 10 mL of THF containing 10 mg hydrophobic IONPs. Then, the reaction mixture was heated to 60 °C and kept at this temperature for 12 h under stirring. Afterwards, the IONPs were precipitated by cyclohexane, isolated via centrifugation, washed with cyclohexane three times, and then dried under a vacuum at room temperature. The particle powders obtained in this way, independent of the molecular weight of PEG and the particle core size, were found to be readily dissolved in water, supporting that the PEG coating was effectively realized. To remove excess PEG ligands, the resultant aqueous solutions containing the PEGylated IONPs were purified by ultrafiltration for 4 cycles using a 100 kDa MWCO centrifugal filter (Millipore YM-100, Merck, Germany).

2.4. Characterizations

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of the nanoparticles were taken on a JEM-100CXII electron microscope (JEOL, Japan) at an acceleration voltage of 100 kV. The particle size was determined by averaging at least 300 particles per sample. Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the particle samples were recorded on a D/Max-2500 diffractometer (Regaku, Japan) under Cu Kα1 radiation (λ = 1.54056 Å). TGA measurements were performed on a TG209F3 thermogravimetric analyzer (NETZSCH, Germany). The magnetic properties of the resultant samples were characterized by using a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM JDM-13, Changchun Yingpu Magnetoelectric Technology Development Co., Ltd., China). Dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements were carried out at 298.0 K with a Nano ZS (Malvern, United Kingdom) equipped with a solid-state He-Ne laser (λ = 633 nm) for measuring the hydrodynamic size of the resultant nanoparticles. The concentration of Fe was determined by using an inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometer (ICP-2000) produced by Jiangsu Skyray Instrument Co., Ltd. (China)

2.5. Relaxivity Measurements

The relaxivity measurements were carried out on a 3 T clinical MRI instrument (Signa 3.0 T HD, GE, Milwaukee, WI, USA). A series of aqueous solutions of PEG-coated IONPs in 2 mL Eppendorf tubes were prepared. The parameters for T1 measurements were set as follows: echo time (TE) = 25.3 ms and repetition time (TR) = 500, 1000, 1500, and 2000 ms. For T2 measurements, the parameters were set as TR = 2000 ms and TE = 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 ms.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis of Hydrophobic IONPs

The hydrophobic IONPs were synthesized based on the thermal decomposition method according to previous reports, with slight modifications [44,45]. The representative TEM images of the as-prepared nanoparticles together with their corresponding particle size distribution profiles are shown in Figure 1a,b. As it can be seen from the figures, nearly monodispersed particles with narrow size distributions and average particle sizes of 3.6 ± 0.5 nm and 10.9 ± 1.5 nm were obtained. For the sake of simplicity, the former samples are referred to as “small” and the latter ones are labeled as “large” nanoparticles throughout this manuscript. The X-ray diffraction patterns of both the small and large nanoparticles shown in Figure 1c matched well with that of the magnetite. Moreover, the room-temperature magnetization curves illustrated in Figure 1d implied that these two groups of samples were superparamagnetic. However, the magnetization (Ms) did not reach the state of saturation for either sample while measured under a range of magnetic fields from the weakest to the highest available in our equipment (12 kOe), suggesting that these two differently sized samples were also prone to paramagnetism. In addition, due to a higher degree of spin disorder on their particle surfaces, the small particles displayed stronger paramagnetic behavior. Although the magnetizations recorded at 12 kOe (i.e., 50.0 emu/g for the small and 42.6 emu/g for the large IONPs) were not fully saturated, they were considered as quasi-saturated magnetizations in interpretation of their performances in MR contrast enhancement effects.

3.2. Ligand Exchange of Hydrophobic IONPs

Thermal decomposition of metal precursors at high temperature in the presence of oleic acid and/or oleylamine in organic media has become the most successful approach for producing monodispersed IONPs. However, the as-prepared IONPs are hydrophobic and cannot be directly used for biomedical applications. As the phosphate group has a strong binding affinity with IONPs, DP-PEG was employed to exchange the hydrophobic ligands on the particle surface and render the hydrophobic IONPs water-soluble. In order to investigate the effect of PEG chain length on the MR contrast enhancement effect, three different molecular weights of DP-PEG, namely 1, 2, and 5 kDa, were utilized. Depending on the molecular weight and the size of the IONPs (small or large), the resulting six hydrophilic samples were labeled as S/L-DP-1/2/5K (e.g., S-DP-1K refers to the samples prepared after exchanging the PEG of 1 kDa molecular weight with the native ligands of small IONPs). After the ligand exchange process, the nanoparticles were dispersed in water, forming transparent and aggregation-free solutions (Figure S1 in Supporting Information).
To gain further insights into the impact of ligand exchange on the morphology of the PEGylated IONPs, TEM measurements were carried out thoroughly, and the detailed results are provided in Figure 2. As suggested by the results, particle aggregation was observed in neither of the six resultant PEGylated samples. Statistical results on particle size indicated that excluding the large IONPs, which encountered a size reduction from 10.9 to 9.5 nm following producing L-DP-1K, the ligand exchange process did not alter the average size and size distribution profiles of the other five samples. The reason for the size reduction in the case of L-DP-1K might lie in the fact that a fixed mass ratio of PEG to IONPs was adopted in the ligand exchange processes. Since PEG with a low molecular weight of 1 kDa was used in producing the L-DP-1K sample, excessive amounts of PEG slightly etched the iron oxide particles. Nevertheless, such phenomenon was not observed for the large IONPs treated by the 2 and 5 kDa PEGs (i.e., L-DP-2K and L-DP-5K sample, respectively).
Although the resultant PEGylated particles in powder form could spontaneously be dissolved in water, any form of aggregation would alter the relaxometric properties of the samples and consequently, pose major obstacles for extracting magnetic relaxivity related to particle size and surface coating structures. Therefore, dynamic light scattering analysis was carried out to characterize the solution properties of the resultant IONPs. As shown in Figure 3, the small and large IONPs exhibited relatively narrow particle size distributions in cyclohexane (before ligand exchange), displaying single, scattering peaks located at 6.1 nm and 12.6 nm, respectively. After ligand exchange, the hydrodynamic size of all the PEGylated nanoparticles increased by different degrees, while the size distribution profiles remained nearly unchanged in comparison to those of their hydrophobic counterparts. In addition, the hydrodynamic size gradually increased with the PEG chain length for both the small and large IONPs. Moreover, the experimentally determined hydrodynamic sizes were in good agreement with the theoretical predictions based on an empirical formula provided in the literature [46], further indicating that the PEGylated particles were homogeneously dispersed in water with no aggregations being present. In addition, all samples possessed excellent colloidal stability and no precipitate was observed even after being stored for 3 years. The lack of aggregation is of great importance for investigating the contrast effects associated with particle size and surface chemistry. More detailed DLS measurement results are given in Table S1 and Figure S2.

3.3. MRI Enhancement Effects of the PEGylated IONPs

To evaluate the MR enhancement effect of the various types of PEGylated IONPs mentioned above, relaxivity measurements were performed on a clinical 3 T MRI scanner at room temperature. Figure 4a shows the T1- and T2-weighted MR images of the small and large IONPs capped with DP-PEG, with different PEG chain lengths. As expected, small IONPs showed obvious T1 and T2 contrast effects, especially when the concentration of iron ions ([Fe]) was higher than 0.6 mmol/L. In contrast, the large IONPs exhibited a stronger T2 contrast effect and no obvious T1 effect. The concentration-independent longitudinal (r1) and transversal (r2) relaxivities are important parameters for qualifying MRI contrast agents in practice. Therefore, obtaining a comprehensive understanding of the structural impacts of PEGylated IONPs on r1 and r2 is of great significance. These parameters were extracted through linear regression fitting of the plots of experimentally determined longitudinal and transverse relaxation rates of water protons against the [Fe], as shown in Figure 4b,c. The fitting results listed in Table 1 indicate that all the samples exhibited comparable r1 values but higher r2 values in comparison to the clinical Gd-based contrast agents [47,48]. In addition, regardless of the PEG chain length, large IONPs showed higher r2 values compared to the small IONPs. Moreover, IONPs of both sizes exhibited monotonically increased r2 against the PEG chain length, contrasting with the slight variation and nonmonotonic behaviors of r1, which showed a maximum value for the samples coated with 2 kDa PEG.
Theoretically, the relaxation enhancement of IONPs is mainly dominated by an outer-sphere mechanism, which originates from the relaxation enhancement of water molecules in bulk water. Under a high magnetic field, the r2 and r1 of IONPs can be expressed by [25,49,50,51,52]:
r 2 = 256 π 2 γ I 2 M n 1215 ρ ( 1 1 + L / a ) 3 M s 2 τ D
r 1 = 128 π 2 γ I 2 M n 405 ρ ( 1 1 + L / a ) 3 M s 2 τ D J A ( 2 ω I τ D )
where γI is the proton gyromagnetic ratio and MS is the saturation magnetization of the IONP core. Mn and ρ are the molar mass and bulk phase density of IONPs, respectively; a is the radius of the IONP core; r stands for the effective radius of particles which is equal to a plus the water impermeable thickness (L) of the surface coating layer (r = a + L); τD is the translational diffusion time (τD = r2/D, D is the water translational diffusion constant); ωI is the proton Larmor frequency; and JA represents Ayant’s spectral density function that can be given by:
J A ( z ) = 1 + 5 z 8 + z 2 8 1 + z + z 2 2 + z 3 6 + 4 z 4 81 + z 5 81 + z 6 648
According to Equation (1), the transverse relaxivity of IONPs depends on many factors, including the particle core size, saturation magnetization, water impermeable thickness of the surface coating layer, and translational diffusion time of protons. As demonstrated previously, the hydrophilic PEGs were effectively replaced with hydrophobic ligands on the particle surface based on their higher binding affinities to iron, which would result in negligible water impermeable thickness of the surface coating layer (i.e., L ≈ 0). Therefore, for IONPs with the same core size, the transverse relaxivity is mainly related to the saturation magnetization and translational diffusion time.
Table 2 and Figure S3 show the VSM results of IONPs coated with DP-PEGs of different PEG lengths. The saturation magnetizations of the samples generally decreased after ligand exchange, regardless of the PEG chain length. This can be attributed to the enhanced disturbance of the surface spin disorder layer thickness caused by PEGylation of the particle surface. In addition, it is worth noting that the saturation magnetization increased with increasing PEG chain length. Presumably, PEG derivatives of longer chain lengths caused higher steric hindrance, giving rise to relatively weaker bonding activity to iron on the particle surface, which in turn, might lead to a thinner surface spin disorder layer. This conjecture is supported by our previous report in which the saturated magnetization of IONPs was shown to be inversely correlated to the binding affinity of PEG derivates capped on the surface of nanoparticles [25].
In comparison with the saturation magnetization, the translational diffusion time is immeasurable. However, according to the expression of τD, it can be easily inferred that the permeability of the PEG coating layer to water molecules can prolong the translational diffusion time because the diffusivity of water molecules in the PEG coating layer is lower than that of water in the bulk phase. Obviously, the translational diffusion time is dependent on the PEG chain length and density on the particle surface. In other words, the longer the PEG chain length is or the higher the PEG density is, the longer the translational diffusion time will be. As DP-PEG of longer chain length exhibit relatively weaker bonding activity to iron on the particle surface, IONPs coated with the longer chain lengths of the polymer would undoubtedly have lower PEG density on their surface. Thus, since the chain length and density have antagonistic effects, evaluating the translational time is difficult.
Nevertheless, as shown in Table 1, the transverse relaxivity was directly proportional to the PEG chain length, which was consistent with the saturation magnetization trend, indicating that the transverse relaxivity difference was dominated by the variation in saturation magnetization. This observation seems reasonable, since the transverse relaxivity is proportional to the translational diffusion time and the square of saturation magnetization.
Similar to the case of transverse relaxivity discussed above, the longitudinal relaxivity is also proportional to the square of saturation magnetization. However, as shown in Figure S4, since the term of τ D J A ( 2 ω I τ D ) in Equation (2) is nonmonotonic for τD, this proportionality is more complex compared to that of transverse relaxivity. The value of the τDJA term rises at the beginning, then drops with the increase in translational diffusion time. As mentioned previously, the relative order of the translational diffusion time for IONPs coated with DP-PEG of different chain lengths is unpredictable. Therefore, the evaluation of the longitudinal relaxivity change caused by the translational diffusion time is intricate. Nevertheless, the results showed that the variation in both of the saturation magnetization and translational diffusion time did not induce any noticeable change in the longitudinal relaxivity of IONPs, with respect to the PEG chain length.
Depending on the application of interest, specific optimizations of certain properties of IONPs need to be performed. For instance, striking a balance between the pharmacokinetics and relaxometric properties of IONPs is necessary for tumor diagnosis in order to prepare high performance nanoprobes. According to previous reports, PEG chain length has remarkable effects on the blood circulation time and metabolic behaviors of IONPs [43,53]. In the current work, it was shown that the PEGylation of IONPs would also result in a relaxivity change of IONPs. We believe that the results of our study shed light on the correlation between these important parameters, providing essential information for seeking the balance.

4. Conclusions

In summary, diphosphonate PEGs with molecular weights of 1, 2, and 5 kDa were used to exchange the hydrophobic ligands of 3.6 nm and 10.9 nm IONPs. The high binding affinity of diphosphonate groups for Fe3+ ions enabled a reliable ligand exchange process for achieving PEGylated IONPs that were well dispersible in water. As a result of the absence of particle aggregation in the resultant solutions, in-depth evaluations of the impacts of the PEG chain length on the contrast effects of the underlying IONPs became feasible. Further systematic investigation showed that the transverse relaxivity, r2, was positively correlated with the PEG chain length due to the enhanced saturation magnetization caused by increasing in PEG chain length. Conversely, the longitudinal relaxivity, r1, exhibited slight and non-monotonous variation with changing PEG chain length, which might be attributed to the antagonistic effects of translational diffusion time and saturation magnetization. In conclusion, the current investigations disclose the impacts of the chain length of PEG ligands on the relaxometric properties of the underlying IONPs and thus, provide valuable information for constructing high-performance MRI contrast agents for specific applications.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano12152673/s1, Figure S1: Photographs of PEGylated IONPs in aqueous solution, Figure S2: Detailed DLS measurement results of large IONPs, Figure S3: Room-temperature magnetization curves of PEGylated IONPs, Figure S4: The τDJA profile computed under magnetic field of 3 T, Table S1: The experimental and predicted hydrodynamic sizes of the PEGylated IONPs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.G. and J.Z.; methodology, J.G., C.L., and L.W.; investigation, J.G., N.W., and R.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, J.G. and M.J.A.; writing—review and editing, C.C., D.Z., D.K., and L.W.; supervision, J.Z., L.W., and M.G.; funding acquisition, J.Z. and M.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFA0208800), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82130059, 82172003, 81720108024), Nature Science Foundation of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (20KJA150006), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20191418), the Suzhou Key Industry Technology Innovation Projects (SYG202036), and Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD) for their financial support.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no competing interest.

References

  1. Shin, T.H.; Kim, P.K.; Kang, S.; Cheong, J.; Kim, S.; Lim, Y.; Shin, W.; Jung, J.Y.; Lah, J.D.; Choi, B.W.; et al. High-resolution T-1 MRI via renally clearable dextran nanoparticles with an iron oxide shell. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2021, 5, 252–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kim, B.H.; Lee, N.; Kim, H.; An, K.; Park, Y.I.; Choi, Y.; Shin, K.; Lee, Y.; Kwon, S.G.; Na, H.B.; et al. Large-Scale Synthesis of Uniform and Extremely Small-Sized Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for High-Resolution T1 Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agents. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 12624–12631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhou, H.G.; Guo, M.Y.; Li, J.Y.; Qin, F.L.; Wang, Y.Q.; Liu, T.; Liu, J.; Sabet, Z.F.; Wang, Y.L.; Liu, Y.; et al. Hypoxia-Triggered Self-Assembly of Ultrasmall Iron Oxide Nanoparticles to Amplify the Imaging Signal of a Tumor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 1846–1853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Weissleder, R.; Nahrendorf, M.; Pittet, M.J. Imaging macrophages with nanoparticles. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13, 125–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yan, S.; Hu, K.; Zhang, M.; Sheng, J.; Xu, X.; Tang, S.; Li, Y.; Yang, S.; Si, G.; Mao, Y.; et al. Extracellular magnetic labeling of biomimetic hydrogel-induced human mesenchymal stem cell spheroids with ferumoxytol for MRI tracking. Bioact. Mater. 2022, 19, 418–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Shen, L.Z.; Li, B.; Qiao, Y.S. Fe3O4 Nanoparticles in Targeted Drug/Gene Delivery Systems. Materials 2018, 11, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Luther, D.C.; Huang, R.; Jeon, T.; Zhang, X.Z.; Lee, Y.W.; Nagaraj, H.; Rotello, V.M. Delivery of drugs, proteins, and nucleic acids using inorganic nanoparticles. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2020, 156, 188–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hu, F.Q.; Wei, L.; Zhou, Z.; Ran, Y.L.; Li, Z.; Gao, M.Y. Preparation of biocompatible magnetite nanocrystals for in vivo magnetic resonance detection of cancer. Adv. Mater. 2006, 18, 2553–2556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, Z.; Yi, P.W.; Sun, Q.; Lei, H.; Zhao, H.L.; Zhu, Z.H.; Smith, S.C.; Lan, M.B.; Lu, G.Q. Ultrasmall Water-Soluble and Biocompatible Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles as Positive and Negative Dual Contrast Agents. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 2387–2393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lu, J.X.; Sun, J.H.; Li, F.Y.; Wang, J.; Liu, J.N.; Kim, D.; Fan, C.H.; Hyeon, T.; Ling, D.S. Highly Sensitive Diagnosis of Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using pH-Responsive Iron Oxide Nanocluster Assemblies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 10071–10074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sandiford, L.; Phinikaridou, A.; Protti, A.; Meszaros, L.K.; Cui, X.; Yan, Y.; Frodsham, G.; Williamson, P.A.; Gaddum, N.; Botnar, R.M.; et al. Bisphosphonate-Anchored PEGylation and Radiolabeling of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide: Long-Circulating Nanoparticles for in Vivo Multimodal (T1 MRI-SPECT) Imaging. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 500–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ge, J.X.; Chen, L.; Huang, B.X.; Gao, Y.; Zhou, D.D.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, C.; Wen, L.; Li, Q.; Zeng, J.F.; et al. Anchoring Group-Mediated Radiolabeling of Inorganic Nanoparticles-A Universal Method for Constructing Nuclear Medicine Imaging Nanoprobes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 8838–8846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lee, N.; Cho, H.R.; Oh, M.H.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, K.; Kim, B.H.; Shin, K.; Ahn, T.Y.; Choi, J.W.; Kim, Y.W.; et al. Multifunctional Fe3O4/TaOx Core/Shell Nanoparticles for Simultaneous Magnetic Resonance Imaging and X-ray Computed Tomography. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 10309–10312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Liu, X.L.; Jiang, H.; Ye, J.; Zhao, C.Q.; Gao, S.P.; Wu, C.Y.; Li, C.H.; Li, J.C.; Wang, X.M. Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Quantum Dot Stabilized Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoprobe for Fluorescence, Magnetic Resonance, and Computed Tomography Triple-Modal In Vivo Bioimaging. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 8694–8706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lee, J.E.; Lee, N.; Kim, H.; Kim, J.; Choi, S.H.; Kim, J.H.; Kim, T.; Song, I.C.; Park, S.P.; Moon, W.K.; et al. Uniform Mesoporous Dye-Doped Silica Nanoparticles Decorated with Multiple Magnetite Nanocrystals for Simultaneous Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Fluorescence Imaging, and Drug Delivery. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 552–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ma, T.; Hou, Y.; Zeng, J.; Liu, C.; Zhang, P.; Jing, L.; Shangguan, D.; Gao, M. Dual-Ratiometric Target-Triggered Fluorescent Probe for Simultaneous Quantitative Visualization of Tumor Microenvironment Protease Activity and pH & ITin Vivo & IT. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 211–218. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lin, L.S.; Cong, Z.X.; Cao, J.B.; Ke, K.M.; Peng, Q.L.; Gao, J.H.; Yang, H.H.; Liu, G.; Chen, X.Y. Multifunctional Fe3O4@Polydopamine Core-Shell Nanocomposites for Intracellular mRNA Detection and Imaging-Guided Photothermal Therapy. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 3876–3883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Liu, N.; Wu, L.; Zuo, W.; Lin, Q.; Liu, J.; Jin, Q.; Xiao, Z.; Chen, L.; Zhao, Y.; Zhou, J.; et al. pH/Thermal-Sensitive Nanoplatform Capable of On-Demand Specific Release to Potentiate Drug Delivery and Combinational Hyperthermia/Chemo/Chemodynamic Therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 29668–29678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cheng, G.H.; Zong, W.; Guo, H.Z.; Li, F.Y.; Zhang, X.; Yu, P.; Ren, F.X.; Zhang, X.L.; Shi, X.E.; Gao, F.; et al. Programmed Size-Changeable Nanotheranostic Agents for Enhanced Imaging-Guided Chemo/Photodynamic Combination Therapy and Fast Elimination. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2100398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vuong, Q.L.; Berret, J.-F.; Fresnais, J.; Gossuin, Y.; Sandre, O. A Universal Scaling Law to Predict the Efficiency of Magnetic Nanoparticles as MRI T2-Contrast Agents. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2012, 1, 502–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Zhou, Z.J.; Yang, L.J.; Gao, J.H.; Chen, X.Y. Structure-Relaxivity Relationships of Magnetic Nanoparticles for Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 180456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Jeon, M.; Halbert, M.V.; Stephen, Z.R.; Zhang, M.Q. Iron Oxide Nanoparticles as T-1 Contrast Agents for Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Fundamentals, Challenges, Applications, and Prospectives. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 1906539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Smolensky, E.D.; Park, H.Y.E.; Berquo, T.S.; Pierre, V.C. Surface functionalization of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles for MRI applications—Effect of anchoring group and ligand exchange protocol. Contrast Media Mol. Imaging 2011, 6, 189–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Tong, S.; Hou, S.; Zheng, Z.; Zhou, J.; Bao, G. Coating Optimization of Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for High T2 Relaxivity. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 4607–4613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Zeng, J.F.; Jing, L.H.; Hou, Y.; Jiao, M.X.; Qiao, R.R.; Jia, Q.J.; Liu, C.Y.; Fang, F.; Lei, H.; Gao, M.Y. Anchoring Group Effects of Surface Ligands on Magnetic Properties of Fe304 Nanoparticles: Towards High Performance MRI Contrast Agents. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 2694–2698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Stepanov, A.; Burilov, V.; Pinus, M.; Mustafina, A.; Rümmeli, M.H.; Mendez, R.G.; Amirov, R.; Lukashenko, S.; Zvereva, E.; Katsuba, S.; et al. Water transverse relaxation rates in aqueous dispersions of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoclusters with diverse hydrophilic coating. Coll. Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 2014, 443, 450–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pöselt, E.; Kloust, H.; Tromsdorf, U.; Janschel, M.; Hahn, C.; Maßlo, C.; Weller, H. Relaxivity Optimization of a PEGylated Iron-Oxide-Based Negative Magnetic Resonance Contrast Agent for T2-Weighted Spin–Echo Imaging. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 1619–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gao, Z.; Hou, Y.; Zeng, J.; Chen, L.; Liu, C.; Yang, W.; Gao, M. Tumor Microenvironment-Triggered Aggregation of Antiphagocytosis 99mTc-Labeled Fe3O4 Nanoprobes for Enhanced Tumor Imaging In Vivo. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1701095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, P.S.; Zeng, J.F.; Li, Y.Y.; Yang, C.; Meng, J.L.; Hou, Y.; Gao, M.Y. Quantitative Mapping of Glutathione within Intracranial Tumors through Interlocked MRI Signals of a Responsive Nanoprobe. Angew. Chem.-Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 8130–8138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fedorenko, S.; Stepanov, A.; Zairov, R.; Kaman, O.; Amirov, R.; Nizameev, I.; Kholin, K.; Ismaev, I.; Voloshina, A.; Sapunova, A.; et al. One-pot embedding of iron oxides and Gd(III) complexes into silica nanoparticles—Morphology and aggregation effects on MRI dual contrasting ability. Coll. Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 2018, 559, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Joshi, H.M.; Lin, Y.P.; Aslam, M.; Prasad, P.V.; Schultz-Sikma, E.A.; Edelman, R.; Meade, T.; Dravid, V.P. Effects of Shape and Size of Cobalt Ferrite Nanostructures on Their MRI Contrast and Thermal Activation. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 17761–17767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Cotin, G.; Blanco-Andujar, C.; Perton, F.; Asin, L.; de la Fuente, J.M.; Reichardt, W.; Schaffner, D.; Ngyen, D.V.; Mertz, D.; Kiefer, C.; et al. Unveiling the role of surface, size, shape and defects of iron oxide nanoparticles for theranostic applications. Nanoscale 2021, 13, 14552–14571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Xie, Y.X.; Jiang, J.N.; Tang, Q.Y.; Zou, H.B.; Zhao, X.; Liu, H.M.; Ma, D.; Cai, C.L.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, X.J.; et al. Iron Oxide Nanoparticles as Autophagy Intervention Agents Suppress Hepatoma Growth by Enhancing Tumoricidal Autophagy. Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 1903323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Jia, Q.J.; Zeng, J.F.; Qjao, R.R.; Jing, L.H.; Peng, L.; Gu, F.L.; Gao, M.Y. Gelification: An Effective Measure for Achieving Differently Sized Biocompatible Fe3O4 Nanocrystals through a Single Preparation Recipe. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 19512–19523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chen, L.; Ge, J.; Huang, B.; Zhou, D.; Huang, G.; Zeng, J.; Gao, M. Anchoring Group Mediated Radiolabeling for Achieving Robust Nanoimaging Probes. Small 2021, 17, 2104977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, X.; Chen, L.; Ge, J.; Afshari, M.J.; Yang, L.; Miao, Q.; Duan, R.; Cui, J.; Liu, C.; Zeng, J.; et al. Rational Constructed Ultra-Small Iron Oxide Nanoprobes Manifesting High Performance for T1-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Glioblastoma. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Lu, X.Y.; Niu, M.; Qiao, R.R.; Gao, M.Y. Superdispersible PVP-Coated Fe3O4 Nanocrystals Prepared by a “One-Pot” Reaction. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 14390–14394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Santra, S.; Tapec, R.; Theodoropoulou, N.; Dobson, J.; Hebard, A.; Tan, W.H. Synthesis and characterization of silica-coated iron oxide nanoparticles in microemulsion: The effect of nonionic surfactants. Langmuir 2001, 17, 2900–2906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lu, C.W.; Hung, Y.; Hsiao, J.K.; Yao, M.; Chung, T.H.; Lin, Y.S.; Wu, S.H.; Hsu, S.C.; Liu, H.M.; Mou, C.Y.; et al. Bifunctional magnetic silica nanoparticles for highly efficient human stem cell labeling. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tromsdorf, U.I.; Bigall, N.C.; Kaul, M.G.; Bruns, O.T.; Nikolic, M.S.; Mollwitz, B.; Sperling, R.A.; Reimer, R.; Hohenberg, H.; Parak, W.J.; et al. Size and Surface Effects on the MRI Relaxivity of Manganese Ferrite Nanoparticle Contrast Agents. Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 2422–2427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Brero, F.; Basini, M.; Avolio, M.; Orsini, F.; Arosio, P.; Sangregorio, C.; Innocenti, C.; Guerrini, A.; Boucard, J.; Ishow, E.; et al. Coating Effect on the H-1-NMR Relaxation Properties of Iron Oxide Magnetic Nanoparticles. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Patsula, V.; Horak, D.; Kucka, J.; Mackova, H.; Lobaz, V.; Francova, P.; Herynek, V.; Heizer, T.; Paral, P.; Sefc, L. Synthesis and modification of uniform PEG-neridronate-modified magnetic nanoparticles determines prolonged blood circulation and biodistribution in a mouse preclinical model. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 10765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Stanicki, D.; Larbanoix, L.; Boutry, S.; Vangijzegem, T.; Ternad, I.; Garifo, S.; Muller, R.N.; Laurent, S. Impact of the chain length on the biodistribution profiles of PEGylated iron oxide nanoparticles: A multimodal imaging study. J. Mater. Chem. B 2021, 9, 5055–5068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Park, J.; An, K.J.; Hwang, Y.S.; Park, J.G.; Noh, H.J.; Kim, J.Y.; Park, J.H.; Hwang, N.M.; Hyeon, T. Ultra-large-scale syntheses of monodisperse nanocrystals. Nat. Mater. 2004, 3, 891–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sun, S.H.; Zeng, H.; Robinson, D.B.; Raoux, S.; Rice, P.M.; Wang, S.X.; Li, G.X. Monodisperse MFe2O4 (M = Fe, Co, Mn) nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 273–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Sperling, R.A.; Liedl, T.; Duhr, S.; Kudera, S.; Zanella, M.; Lin, C.A.J.; Chang, W.H.; Braun, D.; Parak, W.J. Size Determination of (Bio)conjugated Water-Soluble Colloidal Nanoparticles:  A Comparison of Different Techniques. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 11552–11559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Panich, A.M.; Salti, M.; Goren, S.D.; Yudina, E.B.; Aleksenskii, A.E.; Vul’, A.Y.; Shames, A.I. Gd(III)-Grafted Detonation Nanodiamonds for MRI Contrast Enhancement. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 2627–2631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Panich, A.M.; Salti, M.; Prager, O.; Swissa, E.; Kulvelis, Y.V.; Yudina, E.B.; Aleksenskii, A.E.; Goren, S.D.; Vul', A.Y.; Shames, A.I. PVP-coated Gd-grafted nanodiamonds as a novel and potentially safer contrast agent for in vivo MRI. Magn. Reason. Med. 2021, 86, 935–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Koenig, S.H.; Kellar, K.E. Theory of 1/T1 and 1/T2 NMRD profiles of solutions of magnetic nanoparticles. Magn. Reason. Med. 1995, 34, 227–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Brooks, R.A.; Moiny, F.; Gillis, P. On T-2-shortening by weakly magnetized particles: The chemical exchange model. Magn. Reason. Med. 2001, 45, 1014–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Muller, R.N.; Vander Elst, L.; Roch, A.; Peters, J.A.; Csajbok, E.; Gillis, P.; Gossuin, Y. Relaxation by Metal-Containing Nanosystems. In Advances in Inorganic Chemistry; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2005; Volume 57, pp. 239–292. [Google Scholar]
  52. Laurent, S.; Forge, D.; Port, M.; Roch, A.; Robic, C.; Elst, L.V.; Muller, R.N. Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: Synthesis, stabilization, vectorization, physicochemical characterizations, and biological applications. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 2064–2110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Hanot, C.C.; Choi, Y.S.; Anani, T.B.; Soundarrajan, D.; David, A.E. Effects of Iron-Oxide Nanoparticle Surface Chemistry on Uptake Kinetics and Cytotoxicity in CHO-K1 Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Nanomaterials 12 02673 g001 550
Figure 1. TEM images and histograms of the as-prepared hydrophobic 3.6 nm (a) and 10.9 nm (b) IONPs. (c) X-ray diffraction patterns of the hydrophobic samples together with the JCPDS card data (JCPDS 88-0866) for magnetite shown at the bottom. (d) Room-temperature magnetization curves of hydrophobic IONPs. The scale bars correspond to 50 nm.
Figure 1. TEM images and histograms of the as-prepared hydrophobic 3.6 nm (a) and 10.9 nm (b) IONPs. (c) X-ray diffraction patterns of the hydrophobic samples together with the JCPDS card data (JCPDS 88-0866) for magnetite shown at the bottom. (d) Room-temperature magnetization curves of hydrophobic IONPs. The scale bars correspond to 50 nm.
Nanomaterials 12 02673 g001
Nanomaterials 12 02673 g002 550
Figure 2. TEM images and histograms of the PEGylated IONPs after ligand exchange. The scale bars correspond to 50 nm.
Figure 2. TEM images and histograms of the PEGylated IONPs after ligand exchange. The scale bars correspond to 50 nm.
Nanomaterials 12 02673 g002
Nanomaterials 12 02673 g003 550
Figure 3. Number weighted hydrodynamic size profiles of 3.6 nm (a) and 10.9 nm (b) IONPs capped by hydrophobic ligands or DP-PEG of different chain lengths. The small (3.6 nm) and large (10.9 nm) IONPs have been denoted as S and L, respectively. Diphosphonate PEGs (DP) with molecular weights of 1, 2, and 5 kDa were labeled as DP-1K, DP-2K and DP-5K, respectively.
Figure 3. Number weighted hydrodynamic size profiles of 3.6 nm (a) and 10.9 nm (b) IONPs capped by hydrophobic ligands or DP-PEG of different chain lengths. The small (3.6 nm) and large (10.9 nm) IONPs have been denoted as S and L, respectively. Diphosphonate PEGs (DP) with molecular weights of 1, 2, and 5 kDa were labeled as DP-1K, DP-2K and DP-5K, respectively.
Nanomaterials 12 02673 g003
Nanomaterials 12 02673 g004 550
Figure 4. T2- and T1-weighted MR images of IONPs capped with DP-PEG of different chain lengths (a). Plot of R1 (b) and R2 (c) versus Fe concentration of IONPs capped with DP-PEG of different PEG chain lengths.
Figure 4. T2- and T1-weighted MR images of IONPs capped with DP-PEG of different chain lengths (a). Plot of R1 (b) and R2 (c) versus Fe concentration of IONPs capped with DP-PEG of different PEG chain lengths.
Nanomaterials 12 02673 g004
Table
Table 1. Effects of PEG chain length on the relaxivities of DP-PEG-capped IONPs.
Table 1. Effects of PEG chain length on the relaxivities of DP-PEG-capped IONPs.
3.6 nm IONPs10.9 nm IONPs
Sampler2
(mM−1 s −1)		r1
(mM−1 s −1)		Sampler2
(mM −1 s −1)		r1
(mM−1 s −1)
S-DP-1K16.972.67L-DP-1K65.372.96
S-DP-2K24.643.21L-DP-2K79.073.24
S-DP-5K34.822.89L-DP-5K103.282.97
Table
Table 2. The saturation magnetization of IONPs coated with DP-PEGs of different chain lengths 1.
Table 2. The saturation magnetization of IONPs coated with DP-PEGs of different chain lengths 1.
3.6 nm IONPs10.9 nm IONPs
SampleMS
(emu/g)		SampleMS
(emu/g)
S-DP-1K7.69L-DP-1K11.69
S-DP-2K12.97L-DP-2K19.79
S-DP-5K17.99L-DP-5K28.13
1 The saturation magnetization refers to the quasi-saturated magnetization recorded at 12 kOe. The magnetization was normalized to the mass of IONPs (the PEG mass was subtracted based on TGA results).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ge, J.; Li, C.; Wang, N.; Zhang, R.; Afshari, M.J.; Chen, C.; Kou, D.; Zhou, D.; Wen, L.; Zeng, J.; et al. Effects of PEG Chain Length on Relaxometric Properties of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles-Based MRI Contrast Agent. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 2673. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12152673

AMA Style

Ge J, Li C, Wang N, Zhang R, Afshari MJ, Chen C, Kou D, Zhou D, Wen L, Zeng J, et al. Effects of PEG Chain Length on Relaxometric Properties of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles-Based MRI Contrast Agent. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(15):2673. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12152673

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ge, Jianxian, Cang Li, Ning Wang, Ruru Zhang, Mohammad Javad Afshari, Can Chen, Dandan Kou, Dandan Zhou, Ling Wen, Jianfeng Zeng, and et al. 2022. "Effects of PEG Chain Length on Relaxometric Properties of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles-Based MRI Contrast Agent" Nanomaterials 12, no. 15: 2673. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12152673

APA Style

Ge, J., Li, C., Wang, N., Zhang, R., Afshari, M. J., Chen, C., Kou, D., Zhou, D., Wen, L., Zeng, J., & Gao, M. (2022). Effects of PEG Chain Length on Relaxometric Properties of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles-Based MRI Contrast Agent. Nanomaterials, 12(15), 2673. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12152673

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop