Next Article in Journal
Surface Coating-Modulated Phytotoxic Responses of Silver Nanoparticles in Plants and Freshwater Green Algae
Next Article in Special Issue
Magnetic Field Effects Induced in Electrical Devices Based on Cotton Fiber Composites, Carbonyl Iron Microparticles and Barium Titanate Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Journal
Investigation of the Effects of Rapid Thermal Annealing on the Electron Transport Mechanism in Nitrogen-Doped ZnO Thin Films Grown by RF Magnetron Sputtering
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hybrid Magnetorheological Composites for Electric and Magnetic Field Sensors and Transducers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Interfacing MXene Flakes on a Magnetic Fiber Network as a Stretchable, Flexible, Electromagnetic Shielding Fabric

School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(1), 20; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12010020
Submission received: 12 November 2021 / Revised: 15 December 2021 / Accepted: 16 December 2021 / Published: 22 December 2021

Abstract

:
A unique self-standing membrane composed of hierarchical thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU)/polyacrylonitrile (PAN) fibers is prepared by the electrospinning technique, followed by a simple dip-coating process. Fe3O4 nanoparticles are uniformly anchored on TPU/PAN fibers during the electrospinning process, enabling the membrane to achieve effective electromagnetic interference shielding (EMI SE) performance. Such a hybrid membrane has a high magnetization of 18.9 emu/g. When MXene (Ti3C2Tx) layers are further loaded on the TPU/PAN/Fe3O4NPs hybrid membrane, its EMI SE performance in the X band can exceed 30 dB due to the hydrogen bonds generated between the macromolecular chain of PAN and the functional group (Tx) on the surface of MXene. Simultaneously, the interfacial attraction between MXene and the TPU/PAN/Fe3O4NPs substrate is enhanced. The EMI SE mechanism of the hybrid membrane indicates that this film has great potential in the fields of wearable devices and flexible materials

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The continuous development of the intelligence level of wireless communications technology prompts a heavy use of flexible electronic equipment. Enormous quantities of such electronic equipment will produce a large amount of electromagnetic pollution, which can disturb high-precision electronic devices, and poses potential human health hazards. To address this problem, the development of high-performance shielding materials is urgently required in order to prevent or minimize harmful radiation [1,2,3,4,5]. Currently, many studies in this field are focusing on the preparation of electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding fabrics via the integration of metal particles and polymeric or inorganic fabrics [6,7,8]. Such EMI shielding fabrics have excellent conductivity and effective protection performance. Nevertheless, the cost to fabricate such EMI shielding fabrics is very high, and their life span is short due to their susceptibility to migration under humid and high-temperature environments. In contrast to traditional metal materials, Fe3O4 nanoparticles have recently been introduced into EMI shielding fabrics as mixed fillers to enhance electromagnetic wave absorption by making use of their high magnetic properties and excellent compatibility with polymeric materials. However, it is still a huge challenge to overcome the agglomeration and uncontrollable loading of Fe3O4 nanoparticles on the fabrics [9,10]. Carbon-based EMI shielding materials usually have a large surface-to-volume ratio, high chemical and thermal stability, good electrical conductivity, and high EMI SE; such materials include reduced graphene [11], carbon foam [12], multiwalled carbon nanotubes [13], carbon nanofibers [14], etc. Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, no EMI SE materials have been reported with a combination of extremely small thickness, high flexibility, and excellent EMI SE properties. MXenes are two-dimensional metal carbide/nitride layered nanomaterials. Due to their unique layered structure and metal-like conductivity, MXenes have been extensively researched in the field of electromagnetic shielding [15,16,17,18,19]. MXene materials are obtained by selectively etching away the Al layer from a MAX phase, and they have the structure Mn+1XnTx. Specifically, M is a transition metal element, X is carbon and/or nitrogen, and Tx is the terminating group (–F, =O, or –OH) [20,21]. Compared with other two-dimensional materials that lack hydrophilicity, MXenes can be used to easily obtain composite films or fabrics through self-assembly, vacuum filtration, dip coating, and other methods [22,23,24,25,26,27]. However, the relatively weak interaction between the hydrophilic surface of MXenes and hydrophobic elastic matrices limits their application in wearable devices.
Moreover, the reflection of EM waves directly generated on the surface of these materials will inevitably cause secondary electromagnetic radiation pollution and affect the stability and accuracy of devices [28,29]. The prevalence of electromagnetic shielding fabrics has sharply increased due to their light weight, high efficiency, flexibility, customizable molding, and application in complex scenarios [30,31,32,33]. Therefore, new strategies to construct complex conductive networks with adjustable electromagnetic properties should be studied in order to achieve a shielding mechanism based on absorption. MXene coatings can strongly and reliably interact with substrates, showing promise for significantly expanding their use in electromagnetic shielding fabric applications.
This article demonstrates the construction of a conductive and magnetic dual-functional gradient electromagnetic shielding network in the structure of electrospun TPU/PAN/Fe3O4NPs fibers by soaking and drying in a simple solution. Thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) matrix materials have gained great attention due to the advantages of easy processing and beneficial mechanical properties. Here, we chose TPU as the matrix material; TPU/PAN/Fe3O4NPs composite film was prepared by electrospinning, with Fe3O4NPs as a functional filler and PAN as a binder to increase the interaction between the matrix material and the MXene coating. The reflection characteristics of TPFM composite film after dip coating with MXene are affected by the asymmetric network, and the average reflection efficiency (SER) is as low as 4.8 dB. Unlike modifying the surface of MXene with electrically insulating organic molecules to improve the interaction between the MXene and the substrate, the introduction of PAN and Fe3O4NPs via co-spinning maintains the excellent conductivity of the MXene, keeping the MXene nanosheets firmly “locked” on the surface of the modified fiber to achieve high dispersion. In contrast to the use of simple stacking strategies, the MXene nanosheets were very tightly bound to the fibers. Moreover, the prepared TPU/PAN/Fe3O4/MXene film exhibited stable mechanical properties. The exceptional properties of the obtained composite fabrics make them suitable for EMI shielding in wireless technology, robotic joints, and flexible wearable electronic devices.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) granules (Elastollan960A) were supplied by BASF Co., Ltd., Ludwigshafen, Germany. Ti3AlC2 was purchased from 11 Technology Co., Ltd., Jilin, China. PAN powder (Mw = 90,000) was purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. Analytically pure hydrochloric acid (HCl) and lithium fluoride (LiF) were provided by Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. N, N-dimethylformamide (DMF) and acetone were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. Fe3O4NPs were purchased from Sigma Co., Ltd., St. Louis, MO, USA. All materials were used as received, without any further purification.

2.2. MXene Solution Preparation

Ti3C2Tx MXene was prepared by etching aluminum from Ti3AlC2 powder with a modified clay method. In brief, 2 g of LiF and 40 mL of HCl (9M) were stirred in a Teflon vessel for 30 min. Next, 2 g of Ti3AlC2 was slowly added to the beaker under continuous stirring at 35 °C for 24 h. The mixture was then centrifuged until the pH value was greater than 6. The final precipitate was dispersed in deionized water and sonicated in an ice bath for 1 h. Then, it was centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 1 h, and the black/brown-colored supernatant was collected as a small-layer dispersion liquid. The uniformly dispersed supernatant exhibited the Tyndall effect (Figure S1c).

2.3. Preparation of TPU/PAN/Fe3O4/MXene Films

The manufacturing process for obtaining the TPU/PAN/Fe3O4/MXene (TPFM) films is shown in Figure 1a. Colloidal solutions were prepared by dissolving 14 wt% TPU/PAN (TPU:PAN = 5:2) in a mixed solution containing DMF and acetone at a mass ratio of 3:1. The increased volatility of this solvent was necessary in order to reduce the formation of a large number of beads during the electrospinning process. Next, different weight ratios of Fe3O4NPs (0, 3, 6, 12, and 20 wt%) were dispersed in this solution. The electrospinning solution was then mechanically stirred at room temperature for 12 h.
The prepared electrospinning solution was loaded into a plastic syringe with an 18G metal needle. A positive voltage (15 kV) was applied to the needle tip, and the collector plate was grounded by covering it with aluminum foil. The distance between the needle tip and the collector was 15 cm, and the infusion rate was 1–1.5 mL/h. All samples were electrospun under the conditions of 30–35% relative humidity and 25 ± 2 °C. The fiber membranes were then separated from the aluminum foil and dried for 12 h. These fiber membranes were denoted TPF0, TPF3, TPF6, TPF12, and TPF20 based on their Fe3O4NP contents. Next, the TPU/PAN/Fe3O4 (TPF) films with different Fe3O4NP contents were soaked in a deionized water solution containing MXene (2 mg/mL or 5 mg/mL). After drying at 50 °C for 1 h, the MXene sheets formed a uniform coating structure on the TPF films; this structure was the TPFM mat. Figure 1b shows digital photographs of TPF films with different nanomagnetic particle contents and TPF films coated with MXene.

2.4. Characterization

The morphology of the nanomaterials was observed via FE-SEM (FEI, Quanta FEG 450, Hillsboro, OR, USA), and their crystal structure was characterized by XRD (Bruker, D8 Advance, Berlin, Germany); their chemical states were identified by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Thermo Scientific, ESCALAB 250, Waltham, MA, USA). FTIR spectra were taken for a uniformly dispersed sample in KBr in the compressed pellet form, using a PerkinElmer RXI FTIR spectrometer (Waltham, MA, USA) in the frequency range of 500–4000 cm−1.
The electrical conductivity values of the TPU/PAN/Fe3O4/MXene films obtained under different preparation conditions were tested using the four-point probe method at room temperature. Each reported measurement is the average of four samples. The details are reported in our previous work.
A vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM, MicroSense, EV9, Lowell, MA, USA) was used to measure magnetic properties at 300 K. The EMI shielding performance of the sample was measured with an Agilent N5232A vector network analyzer in the 8–12 GHz (X band) microwave range, using waveguide calibration (HD-100VNAWKS, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The measured scattering parameters (S11 and S12) were used to calculate the EMI SE. The specific calculation formulae for determining total EMI SE (SET), absorption shielding effectiveness (SEA), reflection (SER), and multiple internal reflection (SEM) are as follows [34,35]:
R = | S 11 | 2
T = | S 12 | 2
R + A + T = 1
S E R = 10 l o g ( 1 1 R ) = 10 l o g ( 1 1 | S 11 | 2 )
S E A = 10 l o g ( 1 1 A ) = 10 l o g ( 1 | S 11 | 2 | S 12 | 2 )
S E T = S E R + S E A + S E M
where T, R, and A represent the transmission coefficient, reflection, and absorption coefficient, respectively. When SET ≥ 15 dB, the SEM can be negligible [11,28].

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2 shows FE-SEM images displaying the microscopic morphology of the fabricated nanocomposite fabrics with different Fe3O4NP contents. These nanocomposite fiber membranes consist of a three-dimensional network structure formed by interspersed superfine fibers, and the magnetic nanoparticles are randomly distributed throughout the fibers. As shown in Figure 2b–e, due to the stable formation of Taylor cones and the high volatility of the precursor liquid, the TPF nanofiber membranes have no defects (such as spindles or beads). The viscosity of the precursor fluid decreases as the magnetic nanoparticle content increases; this helps the electrostatic force on the surface of the Taylor cone to overcome the viscous resistance, making the electrospinning jet thinner, and reducing the diameter of the produced fibers. In addition, as the Fe3O4NP content increases, Fe3O4NPs partially agglomerate in the solution, resulting in varying degrees of bulging on the fibers. Under this condition, the jet is not stable under the action of the electric field, resulting in an uneven fiber surface; this is conducive to microwave energy loss. As shown in Figure 2f, the MXene sheet is continuously and uniformly dispersed on the surface of TPU/PAN/Fe3O4 with a “scale” appearance, demonstrating that the fibers have thickened and filled into a fiber network. At the same time, the nanofiber network structure can be observed. The element mapping images of TPFM displayed in Figure S2 also show that the MXene layer is evenly dispersed on the fiber surface.
The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the specimens are shown in Figure 3. As shown in Figure 3a, the diffraction peak of MXene obtained after selective etching is at 2θ = 39°, and the most substantial diffraction peak of the MAX phase disappears; this indicates that the etching was successful. The peaks at 2θ = 8.90°, 18.24°, and 27.65° are attributed to the (002), (006), and (008) crystal planes, respectively. In addition, the (002) peak shifts to a lower angle due to the lattice expansion caused by the attachment of groups such as –F or –OH groups to the surface of the MXene. Moreover, this peak is lower in intensity, indicating electrospinning; this indicates the lower re-agglomeration of the Ti3C2 nanosheets. The XRD pattern of the Fe3O4NPs displays characteristic face-centered cubic Fe3O4 peaks at 30.2°, 35.4°, 43.7°, 56.9°, and 63.1°, which are attributed to its (220), (311), (400), (511), and (440) planes, respectively. Because the phase structure of the composite nanofiber textile material does not change, the XRD diffraction patterns of all of the TPFM composite nanofibers with different Fe3O4NP contents show similar XRD diffraction patterns. Due to the encapsulation of TPU/PAN, the relative intensities of their diffraction peaks are reduced compared with the diffraction pattern of pure Fe3O4NPs [36]. In addition, no characteristic diffraction peaks of any other impurities are visible.
To determine the elemental composition of TPFM and investigate the nature of its surface functional groups, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed, and the results were analyzed with Gaussian–Lorentzian curve peak fitting calculations. The Ti 2p XPS spectrum of TPFM is shown in Figure 3c. The area ratio of the three fixed dual-level peaks (Ti 2p1/2, Ti 2p3/2) at 452.9, 454.3, and 457.1 eV is 2:1; these peaks correspond to Ti–C, Ti–O–Fe, and TiO2, respectively, and they demonstrate the strong interaction between them [37]. The Fe 2p XPS spectrum of TPFM is shown in Figure 3b. The peaks at 718.73 eV and 735.58 eV correspond to Fe 2p3/2 and Fe 2p1/2, respectively [38]. The C1s XPS spectrum shown in Figure 3d proves the presence of C–Ti (280.8 eV), C–C (283.9 eV), –CH2– and –CH3 (284.83 eV), CO (285.93 eV), and –COO (288.43 eV) [39].
The FTIR spectra of the samples are shown in Figure 4. The peaks at 3336 cm−1 and 2958 cm−1 in the FTIR spectrum of the original TPU fiber membrane are attributed to N–H stretching vibration and carbon–hydrogen polar covalent bond C–H stretching vibration, respectively [40]. The peak at 1726 cm−1 is the urethane bond. The peaks at 1528 cm−1 and 1171 cm−1 are caused by N–H in-plane bending vibration and C–O stretching vibration, respectively [41]. There is no significant shift in the TPU/MXene spectrum compared to the TPU spectral peak, reflecting that TPU and MXene only weakly interact. An analysis of the sudden disappearance of the PAN/Fe3O4 film signal in the 3431 cm−1 band clearly shows that the nanoparticles strongly interact with nitrogen, hydrogen, carbon, and oxygen atoms in the PAN chain [42]. Moreover, the PAN/Fe3O4 film peak at 2247 cm−1 is attributed to –CN stretching vibration. However, the –CN peak in the PAN/Fe3O4NPs/MXene film spectrum is shifted to 2209 cm−1, and also demonstrates a broader peak shape. The –OH stretching vibration peak of MXene shifts to 3335 cm−1, indicating the formation of a hydrogen bond between –CN and –OH [43]. The changes in the adhesive strength of PAN/Fe3O4NPs/MXene, indicated by the peaks at 1457 cm−1, 1359 cm−1, 828 cm−1, and 767 cm−1, also imply the existence of a force. Some peaks are observed at a low wavenumber of 574 cm−1, indicating the presence of Fe3O4NPs in the PAN/Fe3O4 and PAN/Fe3O4/MXene films [44]. Overall, the addition of PAN and nanomagnetic particles improves interfacial interaction and coating dispersion, due to the hydrogen bonding and electrostatic interaction between the MXene and nanofibers.
The magnetic properties of TPF were analyzed using a vibrating sample magnetometer at room temperature. TPF shows superparamagnetism due to the existence of the nanosized Fe3O4NPs. As shown in Figure 5b, with increasing Fe3O4NP content, the saturation magnetization increases linearly from 2.3 emu/g to 18.9 emu/g, and the coercive field strength increases linearly from 51 Oe to 125 Oe. As displayed in Figure 5a, the strong coercivity of TPF nanofilms at ~300 Oe is attributed to the shape anisotropy of the nanofiber and the ferromagnetic Fe3O4NPs acting as one domain. The magnetocrystalline anisotropy in the nanofiber films can generate more substantial magnetic cleaning and lead to higher coercivity [45].
Relatively high electrical properties are an important condition for efficient EMI shielding performance. Therefore, electrical conductivity testing of composite nanofibers with different Fe3O4NP loadings was carried out with a 4-point probe device. As shown in Figure 6a, the electrical conductivity reached a maximum of 18.9 S/m. Changes in the electrical conductivity of these nanofibers can be attributed to the different Fe3O4 loadings. With increasing Fe3O4NP contents, the dispersion of MXene on the fiber surface is enhanced, the physical connections between the fibers are improved, and the MXene sheet layer forms a conductive path. Figure 6b shows the tensile properties of the composite fibers produced under different processes. The tensile stress of the pure TPU film is 5.78 MPa. When a quantitative PAN and 20 wt% Fe3O4NPs are added, the tensile stress increases to 8.65 MPa; the tensile curves of the composite films fabricated with different Fe3O4NP loadings are shown in Figure S3. As the magnetic nanoparticle loading increases, the tensile stress of TPF first increases and then decreases. Tensile strains lower than that of the initial TPU film are also obtained, which is due to the dispersion-strengthening effect of the Fe3O4NPs. This strengthening mechanism explains that a large number of Fe3O4NPs are attached to the TPU/PAN fiber membrane, which increases the roughness of the fiber membrane. Consequently, friction is generated between the fibers during stretching, increasing the stretching resistance. The applied load therefore increases the strength through the transfer of magnetic particles. The TPFM stretching curve clearly shows that MXene transmits some of the tensile force on the surface layer during stretching, which increases the tensile breaking strength but slightly reduces the tensile strain compared with the original fiber membrane. The effect of Fe3O4NPs on microwave attenuation has been repeatedly proven [46,47], Figure 6c,d show the EMI of the pure TPU film and the TPFM fiber films with different MXene concentrations and Fe3O4NP contents at 8–12 GHz (the X band). The pure TPU film has no shielding ability against electromagnetic waves, while TPU/PAN/Fe3O4/MXene shows satisfactory EMI shielding ability. With an Fe3O4NP loading of 20 wt%, the EMI SE values of films fabricated with 2 mg/mL and 5 mg/mL MXene increase to 24.9 dB (TPF5-2 mg/mL) and 32.5 dB (TPF5-5 mg/mL), respectively. To more reasonably evaluate the contribution of Fe3O4NPs to electromagnetic wave attenuation, the power coefficients R, A, and T were studied (Figure 6e). With increasing magnetic nanoparticle loading, R increases and A slightly decreases, proving that the addition of magnetic particles has a positive effect on EMI SE. To measure the stability of the material’s shielding performance, TPFM was tested for 500 cycles at room temperature. As shown in Figure 6f, the EMI SE of this TPFM was slightly reduced by 1.02% after 500 repeated bending tests; this was due to a small amount of Fe3O4NPs detaching from the fibers, as well as the destruction of the MXene conductive network.
Figure 7a,b show the average SEA and SER values of films with Fe3O4NP loadings at different MXene concentrations. It can be seen that the value of SEA is much greater than SER, which is due to the coordination effect of the entire shielding system. The adhesion of the MXene sheet significantly improves the EMI SE of the TPFM film. In Figure 7b, the surface reflection of TPF20-5 mg MXene is enhanced. This phenomenon can be attributed to the agglomeration of Fe3O4NPs due to the large Fe3O4NPs/MXene content. The internal electron spins of Fe3O4NPs can be arranged spontaneously in a small range to form a spontaneous magnetization zone. Besides, the double-layer non-magnetic coating on the surface of the Fe3O4 nanoparticles enhances the spin disorder in the TPFM composite material, and affects the transmission of microcurrents. Therefore, spin disturbance will affect the generation of microwave currents and affect the surface reflection. Figure 7c shows the SE/t comparison between the TPFM film and some EMI shielding materials reported in a previous work, where SE/t represents the shielding effect of the conductive material to remove the thickness factor. According to observations, the SE/t of the TPFM film can be as high as 72.5 (dB/mm), which achieves a high shielding effect at a very thin thickness.
Figure 7d (mechanism diagram) shows the coordination effect of the entire shielding system. In the absence of Fe3O4NPs, the absorption and attenuation of MXene to electromagnetic waves is relatively weak, because spin disorder plays a vital role in the absorption phenomenon of EMI shielding applications. Similarly, without the MXene interface, it is difficult to transmit the microcurrent generated by Fe3O4NPs. The surface functional groups and local defects of MXene after etching will produce dipolar polarization, which plays a key role in the dielectric loss [48]. At the same time, MXene’s multilayer structure provides a large number of interfaces, which is conducive to interface polarization. Secondly, the bridging effect of TPFM with high conductivity can generate more conductive paths for the movement of charges, which is conducive to the loss of conductivity [48]. When electromagnetic waves fall on the TPFM material, under the influence of an external electric field, the mobile charge carriers are distorted near the multiple interfaces and junctions present in the composite material. These interfaces increase the Debye relaxation process, which also helps to improve the EM absorption characteristics. Increasing the content of Fe3O4/MXene will increase the electron annulus from Fe+2 and Fe+3, thereby improving the conductivity of the composite material. The best balance between dielectric constant and permeability can improve the impedance-matching characteristics of the absorber [49]. In addition, the hierarchical structure of TPFM composite materials can cause multiple reflections of electromagnetic waves. The SEA-to-SER ratio of the 5 mg/mL MXene increased from 1.82 to 5.13 (Figure S4), indicating that the primary mechanism of the TPFM composites is absorption attenuation.

4. Conclusions

To prepare EMI shielding materials with ultrathin thickness, high durability, and excellent EMI SE characteristics, this work proposes a combination of improved electrospinning and coating to fabricate a conductive TPFM fiber film with superparamagnetism. The average thickness of the TPFM film is ~0.45 mm. The doping of PAN increases the bonding force between the conductive layer and the substrate. Moreover, this film is highly durable, with electromagnetic shielding performance maintained after repeated bending for 500 cycles. The electrospinning method allows a high loading of Fe3O4NPs to be easily and efficiently dispersed on the fibers, and the synergy of these magnetic nanoparticles with MXene provides an excellent electromagnetic shielding effect of up to 32.5 dB. The lightweight and stable mechanical properties of this film mean that it is suitable for use in flexible wearable devices and wireless human–computer interaction applications.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano12010020/s1, Figure S1. (a,b) SEM image of the multi-layer MXene and MXene after exfoliation, (c) The Tyndall effect of few layer MXene solution, Figure S2. (a–c) SEM image and element mapping images of TPFM, respectively, Figure S3. Stress-strain curves of the TPF-5 mg MXene with different Fe3O4NPs content, 0 wt%, 3 wt%, 6 wt% and 12 wt% respectively, Figure S4. The ratio of average SEA and SER of TPFM films as a function of Fe3O4NPs/MXene loading.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.M. and X.C.; methodology, Z.M. and H.Z.; software, S.F.; validation, Z.M., S.F. and P.L.; formal analysis, Z.M. and Y.G.; investigation, Y.R.; resources, Z.M.; data curation, J.Y. and D.R.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.M.; writing—review and editing, Z.M. and X.C.; visualization, Z.M.; supervision, Z.M.; project administration, Z.M. and X.C.; funding acquisition, Z.M. and X.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the State Key Laboratory of Advanced Optical Communication Systems and Networks (grant no. 2018GZKF03007), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant no. 2017YFB0306405), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 51201107).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data presented in this article is available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Shahzad, F.; Alhabeb, M.; Hatter, C.B.; Anasori, B.; Man Hong, S.; Koo, C.M.; Gogotsi, Y. Electromagnetic interference shielding with 2D transition metal carbides (MXenes). Science 2016, 353, 1137–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Yan, D.-X.; Pang, H.; Li, B.; Vajtai, R.; Xu, L.; Ren, P.-G.; Wang, J.-H.; Li, Z.-M. Structured Reduced Graphene Oxide/Polymer Composites for Ultra-Efficient Electromagnetic Interference Shielding. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 559–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Elmas, O. Effects of electromagnetic field exposure on the heart: A systematic review. Toxicol. Ind. Health 2016, 32, 76–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Driessen, S.; Napp, A.; Schmiedchen, K.; Kraus, T.; Stunder, D. Electromagnetic interference in cardiac electronic implants caused by novel electrical appliances emitting electromagnetic fields in the intermediate frequency range: A systematic review. Europace 2019, 21, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mathur, P.; Raman, S. Electromagnetic Interference (EMI): Measurement and Reduction Techniques. J. Electron. Mater. 2020, 49, 2975–2998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Kim, K.; Huh, J.Y.; Hong, Y.C. Direct coating of copper nanoparticles on flexible substrates from copper precursors using underwater plasma and their EMI performance. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2021, 265, 114995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xing, D.; Lu, L.; Xie, Y.; Tang, Y.; Teh, K.S. Highly flexible and ultra-thin carbon-fabric/Ag/waterborne polyurethane film for ultra-efficient EMI shielding. Mater. Des. 2020, 185, 108227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ghiyasvand, M.; Naser-Moghadasi, M.; Lotfi-Neyestanak, A.A.; Nikfarjam, A. Improving the Performance of Transparent Enclosure Using Heterogeneous Deposition of a Gold Nanolayer. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2018, 17, 567–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cao, M.S.; Yang, J.; Song, W.L.; Zhang, D.Q.; Wen, B.; Jin, H.B.; Hou, Z.L.; Yuan, J. Ferroferric oxide/multiwalled carbon nanotube vs polyaniline/ferroferric oxide/multiwalled carbon nanotube multiheterostructures for highly effective microwave absorption. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2012, 4, 6949–6956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Im, J.S.; Park, I.K. Mechanically Robust Magnetic Fe3O4 Nanoparticle/Polyvinylidene Fluoride Composite Nanofiber and Its Application in a Triboelectric Nanogenerator. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 25660–25665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wan, Y.-J.; Zhu, P.-L.; Yu, S.-H.; Sun, R.; Wong, C.-P.; Liao, W.-H. Graphene paper for exceptional EMI shielding performance using large-sized graphene oxide sheets and doping strategy. Carbon 2017, 122, 74–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Duan, H.; Zhu, H.; Yang, J.; Gao, J.; Yang, Y.; Xu, L.; Zhao, G.; Liu, Y. Effect of carbon nanofiller dimension on synergistic EMI shielding network of epoxy/metal conductive foams. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2019, 118, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Feng, L.; Zuo, Y.; He, X.; Hou, X.; Fu, Q.; Li, H.; Song, Q. Development of light cellular carbon nanotube@graphene/carbon nanocomposites with effective mechanical and EMI shielding performance. Carbon 2020, 168, 719–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pothupitiya Gamage, S.; Yang, K.; Braveenth, R.; Raagulan, K.; Kim, H.; Lee, Y.; Yang, C.-M.; Moon, J.; Chai, K. MWCNT Coated Free-Standing Carbon Fiber Fabric for Enhanced Performance in EMI Shielding with a Higher Absolute EMI SE. Materials 2017, 10, 1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Sang, M.; Liu, G.; Liu, S.; Wu, Y.; Xuan, S.; Wang, S.; Xuan, S.; Jiang, W.; Gong, X. Flexible PTFE/MXene/PI soft electrothermal actuator with electromagnetic-interference shielding property. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 414, 128883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, F.; Li, Y.; Hao, S.; Cheng, Y.; Zhan, Y.; Zhang, C.; Meng, Y.; Xie, Q.; Xia, H. Well-aligned MXene/chitosan films with humidity response for high-performance electromagnetic interference shielding. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 243, 116467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. He, P.; Cao, M.-S.; Cai, Y.-Z.; Shu, J.-C.; Cao, W.-Q.; Yuan, J. Self-assembling flexible 2D carbide MXene film with tunable integrated electron migration and group relaxation toward energy storage and green EMI shielding. Carbon 2020, 157, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, R.; Ding, L.; Gao, Q.; Zhang, H.; Zeng, D.; Zhao, B.; Fan, B.; Zhang, R. Tuning of anisotropic electrical conductivity and enhancement of EMI shielding of polymer composite foam via CO2-assisted delamination and orientation of MXene. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 415, 128930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lu, Z.; Jia, F.; Zhuo, L.; Ning, D.; Gao, K.; Xie, F. Micro-porous MXene/Aramid nanofibers hybrid aerogel with reversible compression and efficient EMI shielding performance. Compos. Part B Eng. 2021, 217, 108853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wan, Y.; Xiong, P.; Liu, J.; Feng, F.; Xun, X.; Gama, F.M.; Zhang, Q.; Yao, F.; Yang, Z.; Luo, H.; et al. Ultrathin, Strong, and Highly Flexible Ti3C2Tx MXene/Bacterial Cellulose Composite Films for High-Performance Electromagnetic Interference Shielding. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 8439–8449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Li, Y.; Tian, X.; Gao, S.P.; Jing, L.; Li, K.; Yang, H.; Fu, F.; Lee, J.Y.; Guo, Y.X.; Ho, J.S.; et al. Reversible Crumpling of 2D Titanium Carbide (MXene) Nanocoatings for Stretchable Electromagnetic Shielding and Wearable Wireless Communication. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 30, 1907451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Long, Q.; Zhao, S.; Chen, J.; Zhang, Z.; Qi, G.; Liu, Z.-Q. Self-assembly enabled nano-intercalation for stable high-performance MXene membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2021, 635, 119464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kong, F.; He, X.; Liu, Q.; Qi, X.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, R.; Bai, Y. Improving the electrochemical properties of MXene Ti3C2 multilayer for Li-ion batteries by vacuum calcination. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 265, 140–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Salles, P.; Pinto, D.; Hantanasirisakul, K.; Maleski, K.; Shuck, C.E.; Gogotsi, Y. Electrochromic Effect in Titanium Carbide MXene Thin Films Produced by Dip-Coating. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1809223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kurra, N.; Ahmed, B.; Gogotsi, Y.; Alshareef, H.N. MXene-on-Paper Coplanar Microsupercapacitors. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1601372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhou, B.; Li, Y.; Li, Z.; Ma, J.; Zhou, K.; Liu, C.; Shen, C.; Feng, Y. Fire/heat-resistant, anti-corrosion and folding Ti2C3Tx MXene/single-walled carbon nanotube films for extreme-environmental EMI shielding and solar-thermal conversion applications. J. Mater. Chem. C 2021, 9, 10425–10434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vu, M.C.; Mani, D.; Kim, J.-B.; Jeong, T.-H.; Park, S.; Murali, G.; In, I.; Won, J.-C.; Losic, D.; Lim, C.-S.; et al. Hybrid shell of MXene and reduced graphene oxide assembled on PMMA bead core towards tunable thermoconductive and EMI shielding nanocomposites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2021, 149, 106574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Qing, Y.; Zhou, W.; Luo, F.; Zhu, D. Titanium carbide (MXene) nanosheets as promising microwave absorbers. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 16412–16416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, Q.-W.; Zhang, H.-B.; Liu, J.; Zhao, S.; Xie, X.; Liu, L.; Yang, R.; Koratkar, N.; Yu, Z.-Z. Multifunctional and Water-Resistant MXene-Decorated Polyester Textiles with Outstanding Electromagnetic Interference Shielding and Joule Heating Performances. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1806819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, H.; Fu, R.; Su, X.; Wu, B.; Wang, H.; Xu, Y.; Liu, X. MXene confined in shape-stabilized phase change material combining enhanced electromagnetic interference shielding and thermal management capability. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2021, 210, 108835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H.-B.; Dai, Y.; Liu, J.; Li, X.; Yu, Z.-Z. Electrically conductive aluminum ion-reinforced MXene films for efficient electromagnetic interference shielding. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 1673–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yun, T.; Kim, H.; Iqbal, A.; Cho, Y.S.; Lee, G.S.; Kim, M.K.; Kim, S.J.; Kim, D.; Gogotsi, Y.; Kim, S.O.; et al. Electromagnetic Shielding of Monolayer MXene Assemblies. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, e1906769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wu, X.; Han, B.; Zhang, H.-B.; Xie, X.; Tu, T.; Zhang, Y.; Dai, Y.; Yang, R.; Yu, Z.-Z. Compressible, durable and conductive polydimethylsiloxane-coated MXene foams for high-performance electromagnetic interference shielding. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 381, 122622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kumar, P.; Shahzad, F.; Yu, S.; Hong, S.M.; Kim, Y.-H.; Koo, C.M. Large-area reduced graphene oxide thin film with excellent thermal conductivity and electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness. Carbon 2015, 94, 494–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Huang, K.; Chen, M.; He, G.; Hu, X.; He, W.; Zhou, X.; Huang, Y.; Liu, Z. Stretchable microwave absorbing and electromagnetic interference shielding foam with hierarchical buckling induced by solvent swelling. Carbon 2020, 157, 466–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ibrahim Takai, Z.; Kamarulzaki Mustafa, M.; Ahmad Sekak, K.; AbdulKadir, H.K.; Asman, S.; Idris, A.; Mohammad, J. Fabrication, characterization and X-band microwave absorption properties of PANI/Fe3O4/PVA nanofiber composites materials. Arab. J. Chem. 2020, 13, 7978–7989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Halim, J.; Cook, K.M.; Naguib, M.; Eklund, P.; Gogotsi, Y.; Rosen, J.; Barsoum, M.W. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of select multi-layered transition metal carbides (MXenes). Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 362, 406–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Shi, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Zhao, L.; Wang, H.; Zhou, W. Inner-Stress-Optimized High-Density Fe3O4 Dots Embedded in Graphitic Carbon Layers with Enhanced Lithium Storage. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 15043–15052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kim, S.J.; Koh, H.J.; Ren, C.E.; Kwon, O.; Maleski, K.; Cho, S.Y.; Anasori, B.; Kim, C.K.; Choi, Y.K.; Kim, J.; et al. Metallic Ti3C2Tx MXene Gas Sensors with Ultrahigh Signal-to-Noise Ratio. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 986–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Yan, P.; Zhang, R.; Jia, J.; Wu, C.; Zhou, A.; Xu, J.; Zhang, X. Enhanced supercapacitive performance of delaminated two-dimensional titanium carbide/carbon nanotube composites in alkaline electrolyte. J. Power Sources 2015, 284, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Xue, Q.; Zhang, H.; Zhu, M.; Pei, Z.; Li, H.; Wang, Z.; Huang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Deng, Q.; Zhou, J.; et al. Photoluminescent Ti3C2 MXene Quantum Dots for Multicolor Cellular Imaging. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1604847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, Z.; Wang, L.; Sun, D.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, B.; Hu, Q.; Zhou, A. Synthesis and thermal stability of two-dimensional carbide MXene Ti3C2. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2015, 191, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Salavati-Niasari, M. Synthesis and Characterization of Host (Nanodimensional Pores of Zeolite-Y)–Guest [Unsaturated 16-Membered Octaaza–macrocycle Manganese(II), Cobalt(II), Nickel(II), Copper(II), and Zinc(II) Complexes] Nanocomposite Materials. Chem. Lett. 2005, 34, 1444–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhang, D.; Karki, A.B.; Rutman, D.; Young, D.P.; Wang, A.; Cocke, D.; Ho, T.H.; Guo, Z. Electrospun polyacrylonitrile nanocomposite fibers reinforced with Fe3O4 nanoparticles: Fabrication and property analysis. Polymer 2009, 50, 4189–4198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Deng, L.J.; Zhou, P.H.; Xie, J.L.; Zhang, L. Characterization and microwave resonance in nanocrystalline FeCoNi flake composite. J. Appl. Phys. 2007, 101, 103916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Xu, L.; Xiong, Y.; Dang, B.; Ye, Z.; Jin, C.; Sun, Q.; Yu, X. In-situ anchoring of Fe3O4/ZIF-67 dodecahedrons in highly compressible wood aerogel with excellent microwave absorption properties. Mater. Des. 2019, 182, 108006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Liu, Y.; Li, Y.; Jiang, K.; Tong, G.; Lv, T.; Wu, W. Controllable synthesis of elliptical Fe3O4@C and Fe3O4/Fe@C nanorings for plasmon resonance-enhanced microwave absorption. J. Mater. Chem. C 2016, 4, 7316–7323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ma, L.; Lu, Z.; Tan, J.; Liu, J.; Ding, X.; Black, N.; Li, T.; Gallop, J.; Hao, L. Transparent Conducting Graphene Hybrid Films To Improve Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Shielding Performance of Graphene. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 34221–34229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Shang, W.; Liu, Y.; Wan, W.; Hu, C.; Liu, Z.; Wong, C.T.; Fukuda, T.; Shen, Y. Hybrid 3D printing and electrodeposition approach for controllable 3D alginate hydrogel formation. Biofabrication 2017, 9, 025032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Schematic diagram of the fabrication of the TPU/PAN/Fe3O4/MXene fabric. (b) Optical images of electrospun mats with increasing concentration of Fe3O4NPs from 0 to 10 wt%.
Figure 1. (a) Schematic diagram of the fabrication of the TPU/PAN/Fe3O4/MXene fabric. (b) Optical images of electrospun mats with increasing concentration of Fe3O4NPs from 0 to 10 wt%.
Nanomaterials 12 00020 g001
Figure 2. FE-SEM images of the electrospun composite films with (a) 0, (b) 3, (c) 6, (d) 12, and (e) 20 wt % Fe3O4NP contents. (f) TPFM film.
Figure 2. FE-SEM images of the electrospun composite films with (a) 0, (b) 3, (c) 6, (d) 12, and (e) 20 wt % Fe3O4NP contents. (f) TPFM film.
Nanomaterials 12 00020 g002
Figure 3. (a) Normalized XRD patterns of pure Fe3O4NPs, TPU/PAN film, and TPF film. (bd) High-resolution XPS spectra of TPFM in the (b) Fe 2p, (c) Ti 2p, and (d) C 1s regions.
Figure 3. (a) Normalized XRD patterns of pure Fe3O4NPs, TPU/PAN film, and TPF film. (bd) High-resolution XPS spectra of TPFM in the (b) Fe 2p, (c) Ti 2p, and (d) C 1s regions.
Nanomaterials 12 00020 g003
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of TPU, PAN/Fe3O4, TPU/MXene, and PAN/Fe3O4/MXene films.
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of TPU, PAN/Fe3O4, TPU/MXene, and PAN/Fe3O4/MXene films.
Nanomaterials 12 00020 g004
Figure 5. (a) Magnetization hysteresis loops of TPF. (b) Saturation magnetization and coercivity with the variation in the Fe3O4NP contents.
Figure 5. (a) Magnetization hysteresis loops of TPF. (b) Saturation magnetization and coercivity with the variation in the Fe3O4NP contents.
Nanomaterials 12 00020 g005
Figure 6. (a) The resistance of TPFM with different MXene concentrations in Fe3O4NPs. (b) The tensile properties of TPU, TPF, and TPFM. The inset shows a schematic of the microstrain–stress measurement system. (c,d) EMI SE of TPFM with different concentrations of Fe3O4NPs. (e) R, A, and T coefficients in the 8–12 GHz range. (f) EMI SE performance of TPFM after 500 fatigue cycle tests.
Figure 6. (a) The resistance of TPFM with different MXene concentrations in Fe3O4NPs. (b) The tensile properties of TPU, TPF, and TPFM. The inset shows a schematic of the microstrain–stress measurement system. (c,d) EMI SE of TPFM with different concentrations of Fe3O4NPs. (e) R, A, and T coefficients in the 8–12 GHz range. (f) EMI SE performance of TPFM after 500 fatigue cycle tests.
Nanomaterials 12 00020 g006
Figure 7. (a,b) Average EMI SE SET, SEA, and SER values of TPFM2mg/mL and TPFM5mg/mL at different Fe3O4NP contents. (c) Comparison of the SE/t of various fabric- and film-based shielding materials. (d) Schematic diagram of the electromagnetic shielding mechanism for TPFM.
Figure 7. (a,b) Average EMI SE SET, SEA, and SER values of TPFM2mg/mL and TPFM5mg/mL at different Fe3O4NP contents. (c) Comparison of the SE/t of various fabric- and film-based shielding materials. (d) Schematic diagram of the electromagnetic shielding mechanism for TPFM.
Nanomaterials 12 00020 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Miao, Z.; Chen, X.; Zhou, H.; Liu, P.; Fu, S.; Yang, J.; Gao, Y.; Ren, Y.; Rong, D. Interfacing MXene Flakes on a Magnetic Fiber Network as a Stretchable, Flexible, Electromagnetic Shielding Fabric. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12010020

AMA Style

Miao Z, Chen X, Zhou H, Liu P, Fu S, Yang J, Gao Y, Ren Y, Rong D. Interfacing MXene Flakes on a Magnetic Fiber Network as a Stretchable, Flexible, Electromagnetic Shielding Fabric. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(1):20. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12010020

Chicago/Turabian Style

Miao, Zhen, Xiaohong Chen, Honglei Zhou, Ping Liu, Shaoli Fu, Jiajie Yang, Yuhang Gao, Yupeng Ren, and Dong Rong. 2022. "Interfacing MXene Flakes on a Magnetic Fiber Network as a Stretchable, Flexible, Electromagnetic Shielding Fabric" Nanomaterials 12, no. 1: 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12010020

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop