Next Article in Journal
A New Method for Dispersing Pristine Carbon Nanotubes Using Regularly Arranged S-Layer Proteins
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Dynamics Simulation for the Effect of Fluorinated Graphene Oxide Layer Spacing on the Thermal and Mechanical Properties of Fluorinated Epoxy Resin
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 11
Issue 5
10.3390/nano11051345
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Calcium Alginate Beads with Entrapped Iron Oxide Magnetic Nanoparticles Functionalized with Methionine—A Versatile Adsorbent for Arsenic Removal

by
Surbhi Lilhare
1,
Sunitha B. Mathew
1,*,
Ajaya K. Singh
1,* and
Sónia A. C. Carabineiro
2
1
Department of Chemistry, Govt. V. Y. T. PG Autonomous College, Durg, Chhattisgarh 491001, India
2
LAQV-REQUIMTE, Department of Chemistry, NOVA School of Science and Technology, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2021, 11(5), 1345; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11051345
Submission received: 30 March 2021 / Revised: 13 May 2021 / Accepted: 17 May 2021 / Published: 20 May 2021
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
A novel beads adsorbent, consisting of calcium alginate entrapped on magnetic nanoparticles functionalized with methionine (MFMNABs), was developed for effective elimination of arsenic from water. The material was characterized by FT-IR (Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy), SEM (Scanning Electron Microscopic), XRD (X-ray Diffraction) and TEM (Transmission Electron Microscopy). The arsenic removal capacity of the material was studied by altering variables such as pH of the solution, contact time, adsorbent dose and adsorbate concentration. The maximal removal of As(III) was 99.56% under optimal conditions with an equilibrium time of 110 min and pH 7.0–7.5. The adsorption followed a second order kinetics and data best fitted the Langmuir isotherm with a correlation coefficient of R2 = 0.9890 and adsorption capacity (qm) of 6.6533 mg/g. The thermodynamic study showed entropy change (∆S) and enthalpy change (∆H) to be 34.32 J mol−1 K and 5.25 kJ mol−1, respectively. This study proved that it was feasible to treat an As(III) solution with MFMNABs. The synthesized adsorbent was cost-effective, environmentally friendly and versatile, compared to other adsorbents. The adsorption study was carried by low cost spectrophotometric method using N- bromosuccinimide and rhodamine-B developed in our laboratory.

1. Introduction

Arsenic is naturally present in the crust of Earth and has long been recognized as highly toxic and carcinogenic, affecting millions of humans in the world [1,2]. Long-term exposure to arsenic gives symptoms such as vomiting, abdominal pain, diarrhea, severe gastrointestinal irritation, gastrointestinal damage, cardiac damage and several types of cancer [3]. It can result in vascular diseases like black foot disease [4,5]. Arsenic can be found in both organic and inorganic forms, as trivalent arsenite (H3AsO3, HAsO32− or H2AsO3−) and pentavalent arsenate (H3AsO4, HAsO42−, H2AsO4− or AsO43−), of which the first form, As(III) is more noxious than As(V) [6]. In oxidizing conditions, arsenite converts to arsenate, and vice versa under reducing conditions. Inorganic arsenic compounds are more harmful and toxic, compared to organic arsenic compounds [7]. Inorganic and organic arsenic compounds are mainly used to preserve wood and as pesticides [8,9]. It also finds applications in many industries such as pharmaceuticals, paints, pesticide production, leather, textiles, etc. Several food supplements and care products contain trace amounts of arsenic and it is also used in medical products [10]. The maximum permissible limit for As in drinking water is 10 µg/L, as defined by the World Health Organization [11].
Several techniques were reported for elimination of arsenic from water, namely oxidation [12], alum and iron coagulation [13,14], adsorption and ion-exchange (iron-coated sand, activated alumina and ion-exchange resin) [15,16], filtration with membranes [17] and reverse osmosis [17]. Most of the methods suffer several shortcomings. Among these technologies, adsorption is cost effective, easy to operate, highly efficient and most popular, since a variety of adsorbents are available [18,19]. Several materials were reported for As(III) removal, like pyrite fines, activated alumina, fly ash, manganese greensand [20], meso porous silicas with amino-functionalizations [21], Al-loaded Shirasu-zeolite [22], clinoptilolite and other zeolites [23,24,25]. However, they suffer from some disadvantages, like complexity, high cost, etc.
Alginate has several advantages as it is cheap and easily forms cross-linking with a CaCl2 solution. Ca2+ cations are able to bind two carboxyl moieties of guluronic remains in alginate chains. It is a natural product (natural polysaccharide extracted from brown seaweeds), which is non‒toxic, inexpensive, biodegradable, biocompatible and water soluble. It has been largely used for immobilization of activated carbon (C) [26], carbon nanotubes (C-NT) [27], nanoparticles of TiO2 [28] and magnetite [29], generating novel adsorbents to eliminate heavy metals, pigments and dyes from wastewater. Pure Magnetic Nanoparticles (MNPs) are not applied directly on account of the robust dipole–dipole attractions between the MNPs and the large surface area that might lead to aggregation during the adsorption process. Therefore, magnetic nanoparticles are entrapped into several types of stabilizers (organic and inorganic), such as activated carbon [30], chitosan [31,32,33,34], β-cyclodextrin [35,36] and alginate biopolymer [37,38,39]. In this work, methionine, a sulfur containing amino acid, has been incorporated along with alginate.
In the present study, a new adsorbent MFMNABs (calcium alginate beads with entrapped iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles functionalized with methionine) has been synthesized and applied for the removal of As(III). MFMNABs was found to be a cheap, ecofriendly adsorbent for the elimination of arsenic (III) with comparable adsorption capacity and recoverability. It is effective given its large surface area and occurrence of surface amino groups. This adsorbent is evaluated with respect to various variables like temperature, time, pH, etc. in batch conditions. The adsorption isotherms, kinetics and thermodynamic studies have been performed and found to have advantages like cheapness, simplicity, good reproducibility and high adsorption. Adsorption studies of As(III) using ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectrophotometry and atomic absorption spectroscopy are reported [40,41]. Herein, a simple spectrophotometric method developed in our laboratory using N-bromosuccinimide and rhodamine-B is used for investigating the adsorption process.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Reagents

Sodium arsenite (NaAsO2) (Merck, Mumbai, India), methionine (C5H11NO2S) (Merck, Mumbai, India), N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) (Schmid and Co., Freudenstadt, West Germany), rhodamine-B (S.D. Fine Chem. Ltd., Mumbai, India), sodium alginate (C6H9NaO7) [CDH, Delhi, India], ferric chloride hexahydrate (FeCl3·6H2O) [CDH, Delhi, India], ferrous chloride dihydrate (FeCl2·2H2O) [CDH, Delhi, India], NH4OH [AR grade, Mumbai, India] and HCl (Loba Chemie, Mumbai, India) were used. The chemicals were all analytical grade and no further purification was made before use. Double distilled water (DDW) was utilized.
A stock solution of As(III) (1000 mg L−1) was obtained by dissolution of 0.1732 g of analytical grade NaAsO2 in 100 mL of DDW. A 0.002 M N-bromosuccinimide solution was obtained by dissolution of 0.178 g of NBS in 100 mL distilled water and kept in an amber colored bottle. The required working solutions of NBS were prepared by dilution of the stock solution. A 0.001 M of rhodamine-B solution was prepared. Hydrochloric acid was diluted with DDW to get 0.01 M HCl.

2.2. Equipments

X-ray diffraction (XRD) (Expert-Pro PW3064/60, Raipur, India) analysis of powdered samples was done at 30°–80° and PANalytical 3 kW X’pert Powder-Multifunctional. Fourier transform-infrared spectrometer (FT-IR) (Thermo Nicolet Avtar 370, Cochin, India) was used to obtain the infrared spectra in the 400–4000 cm−1 range using KBr pellets. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) images of MFMNABs were obtained before and after adsorption (Jeol 6390LA/OXFORD XMX N, Cochin, India). The details of shape and characteristics features was obtained from Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) images (Jeol/JEM 2100, Cochin, India). Systronic UV-visible spectrophotometer-117 (Carry 50 scan, Varian, Durg, India) with 1 cm quartz cell (0.1 mL) was used for the measurement of absorbance. The pH was measured by a digital pH meter (Systronics model-112, Durg, India).

2.3. Synthesis of Methionine Functionalized Magnetic Nanoparticles (MFMNPs)

The nanoparticles (NPs) were obtained by co-precipitation [42]. Fe(II) and Fe(III) were co-precipitated by ammonia in hydrothermal conditions. A total of 2.4 g of ferrous chloride and 4.8 g of ferric chloride were separately dissolved in 50 mL DDW and 15 mL of 1.5 M NH4OH was added dropwise at 25–30 °C with stirring, at pH 10. The black precipitate obtained was separated magnetically and washed 4–5 times with DDW. To this 10 mL of 0.1% methionine in double distilled water was added dropwise. The content was heated up to 80 °C over 30 min with stirring. The obtained methionine functionalized magnetic nanoparticles were separated by applying an external magnet, properly washed with DDW and dried for 2 h at 250 °C.

2.4. Preparation of Calcium Alginate Beads with Entrapped Iron Oxide Magnetic Nanoparticles Functionalized with Methionine (MFMNABs)

A total of 1.5 g sodium alginate was dissolved in 50 mL DDW with stirring for 2 h to yield a viscous homogenous solution. Then, 1 g of methionine modified Fe3O4 NPs was added with stirring. Thereafter the mixture was added dropwise to the CaCl2 solution, and MFMNABs were obtained. To get stable beads, the gel beads were kept in CaCl2 solution for 24 h. The beads were washed several times with DDW and stored in DDW for later use. The color of beads was reddish brown given the entrapping of the magnetic NPs modified by alginate. The synthesis of MFMNABs is presented in Figure 1.

2.5. Procedure for As(III) Analysis

After adsorption, the beads and liquid were separated by normal filter paper and the amount of As(III) in solution was determined spectrophotometrically. To 5 mL of the filtrate 0.002 M NBS solution (2.5 mL) was added, where NBS oxidizes As(III) and the unconsumed NBS, corresponding to the concentration of As(III) was determined by addition of 0.001 M of rhodamine-B (4 mL). The mixture was left for 5 min. The unconsumed NBS bleached the color of rhodamine-B and absorbance was measured at 555 nm.

2.6. Batch Adsorption Studies

Batch adsorption studies indicate that As(III) can be adsorbed onto the prepared modified alginate beads. The experimental parameters were optimized by investigating the various parameters like solution pH (4.0–9.0), time of contact (15–120 min), dosage of adsorbent (0.1–2.0 g) and concentration of As(III) in solution (10–35 mg/L). The pH was adjusted by 0.1 N HCl and 0.1 N NaOH. The appropriate amount of adsorbent (MFMNABs) was added to an aliquot containing a known amount of As(III) with the intended initial pH and adequate contact time to reach equilibrium. The absorbance was measured by UV-Vis spectrophotometry at 555 nm. The % amount of As(III) removal was obtained by Equation (1):
%   Removal = C 0 − C e C 0 × 100
While the quantity of adsorbed As(III) (qe) was determined from Equation (2):
q e = ( C 0 − C e )   V m
where C0 is the initial concentration and Ce is the equilibrium concentration of As(III) (μg/mL), m being the mass of adsorbent (g) and V the solution volume (L) [43].

2.7. Determination of pHpzc (Point of Zero Charge)

In a series of 50 mL conical flasks containing 10 mL of 0.01 M NaCl, 0.1 N of NaOH solution was added to adjust the initial pH (pHi) in the range 4–9. Then, to each flask, 1.6 g MFMNABs was added and shaken for 24 h on a rotatory shaker at 150 rpm and the final pH (pHf) was noted. The difference between the initial and final pH (ΔpH = pHi − pHf) was plotted against the initial pH (pHi) of the solution. The pH on the horizontal line in the plot corresponding to ΔpH equal to zero gives pHpzc.

2.8. Adsorption Isotherm

The adsorption efficiency was determined from adsorption isotherms. The adsorption is studied by obtaining the equilibrium concentration using various isotherms [44,45]. Herein, the most common isotherms, namely, Frendlich [46], Langmuir [47] and Temkin [48] were used to find the best model fitting.
Langmuir isotherm: This model was used to assess the adsorption process using Equation (3):
1 q e = 1 q m + 1 K m · q e · 1 C e
where Km—Langmuir adsorption constant (L/mg) and qm—maximum adsorption capacity of the adsorbent (mg/g). Ce and qe—equilibrium concentration and equilibrium adsorption capacities (mg/g) of As(III) ions, respectively. The value of R2 was obtained from the plot 1/qe vs. 1/Ce. In addition to this, the dimensional separation factor (RL) was calculated to characterize isotherms using Equation (4):
R L = 1 1 − K L C 0
where C0 refers to the initial concentration of adsorbate and KL is the rate of adsorption. The RL value infers that adsorption was irreversible (RL = 0), favorable (0 < RL < 1) linear, (RL = 1) or unfavorable (RL > 1). [49,50,51].
Freundlich isotherm: This model was used for investigating the adsorption capacity on heterogeneous surfaces and formation of monolayer. It is expressed by Equation (5):
log q e = log K F + 1 n log C e
where KF (L/mg) and n are Freundlich constants signifying, respectively, the adsorption capacity and intensity of the system. Ce and qe are equilibrium concentration and equilibrium adsorption capacity (mg/g) of As(III) ions, respectively. KF and 1/n are calculated from the slope and intercept of log qe versus log Ce plot, respectively.
Temkin isotherm: This model is based on the surface coverage and expressed by Equation (6):
q e = B 1 ln K T + B 1 ln C e
where B1 = RT/b, B1 is the Temkin constant dealing with the heat of adsorption (kJ/mol), T represents absolute temperature (K), R the gas constant (8.314 J/mol K) and KT the equilibrium binding constant (L/g). The plot of qe versus ln Ce, enables to determine KT and B1.

2.9. Adsorption Kinetics

Most of the adsorption/desorption processes of many solid substances depend on time.
Pseudo-first-order kinetic model: This model of Lagergren’s kinetic equation for the adsorption of adsorbates from liquid solutions is expressed as follows [52]:
log ( q e − q t ) = log q e − k 1 t 2.303
where qe (mg/g) and qt (mg/g) are quantities adsorbed at equilibrium and time t (min), respectively, and k1 (min−1) is the rate constant for pseudo-first-order equation. The values of k1 and qe were calculated by plotting log (qe − qt) versus time (t).
Pseudo-second-order kinetic model: This model assumes that adsorption is controlled by chemical adsorption [53]:
t q t = t k 2 q e 2 − 1 q e
where qe and qt are adsorption capacity (mg/g) at equilibrium and time t (time), and k2 (g/g per min) is the rate constant. The values of k2 and qe are calculated from the slope and intercept of the t/qt versus t plot.
Intraparticle diffusion kinetic model: The intraparticle (pore) diffusion mechanism of As(III) was studied by using the Weber and Morris model of diffusion [54], following the equation given by:
q t = K d t 1 / 2 + C
where Kd (mg/g min1/2) is the diffusion rate constant; C (mg/g) is the intercept in the diffusion model. The slope and intercept were obtained by plotting qt versus √t.
Elovich kinetic model: This model applies satisfactorily to the chemisorption process, which implies multilayer adsorption [55] and is expressed by Equation (10).
q t = α + β ln t
where qt (mg/g) is the amount of As(III) adsorbed for time t (min), α (mg/g min−1) and β (g/mg) are obtained from the slope (β) and intercept (α) of the linear plot of qt versus ln t.

2.10. Regeneration Studies

Desorption studies were made to assess the regeneration capacity of the adsorbent. MFMNABs (1.6 g) were placed in a 100 mL conical flask with 10 µg/mL concentration of As(III) and shaken for 110 min in an incubator shaker at 30 °C. Beads were separated by a magnet and the concentration of arsenic was measured. Then, MFMNABs were recycled by washing with 0.1 N NaOH and then three times with DDW. The beads were then again added to a fresh As(III) solution and the reusability was verified.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Adsorbent Characterization

3.1.1. X-ray Diffraction

X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of MFMNPs, MFMNABs (before adsorption) and MFMNABs (after adsorption) show characteristic peaks, as depicted in Figure 2. The XRD diffraction pattern obtained for MFMNPs and MFMNABs (before and after adsorption) exhibits consistent peaks at (220), (311), (400), (422), (511) and (440) which is identical to that Standard JCPDS data [56] reported for Fe3O4 nanoparticles as well as the methionine-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles [57,58]. The materials show sharp peaks, indicating that particles are crystalline and of small size and these results matched with the planes of the cubic structure of Fe3O4 (face-centered cubic) [57].
The average crystal size (D) of MFMNPs, MFMNABs (before adsorption) and MFMNABs (after adsorption) were determined by the Debye-Scherrer’s Equation (11) [59]:
D = K · λ β · c o s θ
where D is average crystal size in Å, θ is the peak angle, β is FWHM (Full Width at Half Maximum) of the sharp peaks, λ is the wavelength of X-rays (1.54 Å) and K is constant (equal to 0.9). The results are presented in Table 1. The XRD results show that the average size of the particles of MFMNPs was 17.04 nm and after crosslinking with alginate, the mean size of the MFMNABs particles was reduced to 12.95 nm. After adsorption, the average size of MFMNABs was 20.68 nm. The d-spacing and particle size obtained from HR-TEM and XRD data (311) are presented in Table 2.
Figure 3 shows the size distribution curve of MFMNABs. It was observed that the average size calculated by the Debye–Scherrer formula (Equation (11) using XRD data (12.68 nm) is in close proximity with that calculated by the Bragg’s Equation (12) using TEM data (12.95 nm) [60].
n λ = 2 d · s i n θ
where n is an integer and d is interplanar distance.

3.1.2. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy

MFMNPs and MFMNABs (before and after adsorption) were studied by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and results are shown in Figure 4. The broad and strong peaks at 3434 cm−1 (MFMNPs) shifted to 3432 cm−1 (MFMNABs-before adsorption) and 3458 cm−1 (MFMNABs-after adsorption) are ascribed to stretching vibrations of ‒OH and ‒NH2 [61]. The weak peaks at 2921 and 2855 cm−1 in MFMNPs, 2923 and 2851 cm−1 in MFMNABs (before adsorption), and 2923 and 2847 cm−1 in MFMNABs (after adsorption) are ascribed to C–H stretching vibrations [62]. The peak 1628 (MFMNPs) cm−1 assigned to asymmetric stretching of NH3+ get shifted to 1631 cm−1 (MFMNABs-before adsorption) and 1632 cm−1 (MFMNABs-after adsorption). The additional peak at 1414 cm−1 in MFMNABs (before adsorption) is assigned to the symmetric stretching vibration of COO− of sodium alginate [63]. The weak bands observed at 1389 cm−1 (MFMNPs), 1388 (MFMNABs-before adsorption) and 1384 (MFMNABs-before adsorption) were attributed to the stretching vibration of the C = O [64] bond and the band at 1120 cm−1 to the bending vibration of NH3 [65]. The peaks at 1037 cm−1 (MFMNPs), shifted to 1028 cm−1 (MFMNABs-before adsorption) and 1026 cm−1 (MFMNABs-after adsorption) indicate C–O stretching vibrations [66]. The presence of a band at 556 cm−1 (MFMNPs), 562 cm−1 MFMNABs (before adsorption) and 560 cm−1 MFMNABs (after adsorption) is due to the vibration of Fe–O bond in Fe3O4 and C–S–C stretching mode [67,68].

3.1.3. Scanning Electron Microscopy

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) was used to characterize the unmodified and modified beads (before and after adsorption). SEM images of MFMNPs and MFMNABs (before and after adsorption) taken under different magnification is shown in Figure 5. Figure 5a,b reveals that the surface of MFMNPs are much smother as compared to the surface of MFMNABs. Figure 5c,d indicate that after cross-linking with alginate, MFMNABs exhibit rough, multi-layered surface with wide cavities and irregular pores. Figure 5e,f shows that the surface of MFMNABs after adsorption become aggregated with narrow cavities.

3.1.4. Transmission Electron Microscopy

The shape and size of adsorbent were examined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). A matrix with spherical or ellipsoidal particles smaller than 20 nm is seen (Figure 6). The distribution curve shows that the sizes of particles are distributed in the range of 6–20 nm and the majority of particle sizes are between 12–14 nm (Figure 3). Most particles were scattered but some are aggregated indicating stabilization. The structure of the synthesized functionalized beads was examined with selected area electron diffraction (SAED). The contrast image show diffraction rings with bright spots depicting the polycrystalline nature of the adsorbent.

3.2. pH Effect

pH is important for adsorption, as it affects the adsorption capacity of the adsorbent. The effect of pH on As(III) removal efficiency is shown in Figure 7a. Removal of As(III) was investigated by varying the pH ranging from 4 to 9 under the following conditions: 10 mg/L initial As(III) concentration, 1.0 g dosage, 110 min contact time and room temperature (~35 °C). The pH of the sample was adjusted using 0.1 N NaOH or 0.1 N HCl. The percentage removal was obtained at equilibrium and it was found that the percentage removal (%) was maximal at pH 7.0–7.5. Thus, pH 7 was used for further studies.
In an aqueous solution, the As(III) species formed are likely to be H3AsO3 and H2AsO3− or HAsO32− anionic forms. Below 9.2, the non-ionic H3AsO3 is the dominant species of As(III) and weak Van der Waals forces are expected between As(III) and MFMNABs. As the pH approaches 7, the amounts of anionic species H2AsO3− tend to increase, resulting in more specific binding, leading to enhanced removal of As(III) [69]. The point of zero charge (pHpzc) for MFMNABs value was found to be 7.66 (Figure 7b). The surface is positively charged below this value and small amounts of anionic species are adsorbed due to electrostatic attraction in the pH range 7.0 to 7.5. However, when the pH is higher than the pHpzc value, the adsorbent surface is negatively charged, causing the repulsion force [70,71]. Adsorption may also be due to strong chelation via sulfur and −NH2 group of the adsorbent. N and S atoms are potent donors due to presence of lone pair of electrons [72,73].
The enhanced removal of As(III) at pH 7.0–7.5 may also be attributed to the formation of an outer-sphere complex by hydrogen bonding or probably because of inner sphere complex formation through ligand exchange with a hydroxyl group (−OH) on the adsorbent surface. In acidic pH, the highly protonated adsorbent surface is less favourable for inner-sphere complex formation by As(III), which leads to a decrease in removal capacity [74]. At basic pH, presence of large amounts of OH− may compete for adsorption sites with anionic As(III) species which affects the removal capacity of As(III) [74].

3.3. Adsorbent Dose Effect

The adsorbent dose effect on the As removal was studied and results are shown in Figure 8a. The elimination of As(III) in water was investigated by varying the amounts of adsorbent (0.1–2.0 g). The removal efficiency improved by augmenting the adsorbent amount from 0.1 to 1.6 g. The greater the number of vacant sites on the adsorbent, the greater the capacity of adsorption. As the dosage increased from 0.1 g to 1.6 g in 10 µg/mL of As(III) ions at pH 7, the % removal increased from 92.7% to 95.4%, but afterwards, the removal remained constant. The optimal dose was 1.6 g.

3.4. Contact Time Effect

The removal of As(III) at diverse timings is found in Figure 8b. A total of 10 mL of As(III) solution (10 mg/L) was taken at 7 pH and 1.6 g of adsorbent was added. The extraction of As(III) increases from 90.2% to 94.9% then reaching the steady state in 105 min. After equilibrium, the amount removed remains the same though the agitation time is increased to 120 min. The availability of a large number of vacant sites initially leads to rapid adsorption. However, with time, the number of vacant sites diminish, and elimination slows. It was observed that the maximum % removal of 94.9% was obtained at 110 min.

3.5. Initial Concentration Effect

The adsorption of As(III) was followed by varying the arsenic amount (10–35 µg/mL), with 1.6 g dosage, 110 min contact time and room temperature (~35 °C). In general, the amount of As(III) removed by MFMNABs first augmented with the rise of the initial concentration of arsenic and the optimal value of 99.56% was observed at 10 µg/mL arsenic concentration. More active sites are available for adsorption of As(III) ions at lower concentrations. With the number of As(III) ions being increased at higher concentrations, less active sites are available for adsorption. Figure 8c shows that As(III) adsorption is dependent of its initial amount, and when this quantity increases, the adsorption is lower. With an increase in the initial amount of As(III), these ions compete for free sites of the adsorbent, which results in the saturation of more sites. There is a very slight improvement in adsorption upon an increase in the arsenic amount, more noticeable for low concentrations (5–10 µg), showing high affinity [75].

3.6. Adsorption Isotherm

Adsorption isotherms were analyzed using the Langmuir (Figure 9A), Freundlich (Figure 9B) and Temkin (Figure 9C) isotherm models to evaluate the best fit with the correlation coefficients (R2). Results are presented in Table 3. The data showed that Langmuir isotherm model was the best fit with a R2 = 0.9890, compared to Freundlich (R2 = 0.9682) and Temkin (R2 = 0.9711) models, proving the homogeneous surface. The maximum adsorption capacity was 6.6533 mg/g for the MFMNABs. In addition, the value of the dimensional separation factor (RL) was found to be less than 1, which confirms that the adsorption of As(III) is a favorable process.

3.7. Adsorption Kinetics

Adsorption of As(III) by MFMNABs was modeled using pseudo-first-order (Figure 10A), pseudo-second-order (Figure 10B), Elovich (Figure 10C) and intra-particle diffusion (Figure 10D) models to explain the kinetic data. The values of the kinetic model parameters are listed in Table 4. The pseudo second order kinetic model shows the highest R2 value of 0.9998. The kinetic results agree with those of different carbon and clay-based adsorbents [76,77,78].

3.8. Thermodynamic Parameters

A rise in temperature caused an enlargement in the rate of As(III) adsorption proving [78] that the process is endothermic [79]. The adsorption thermodynamic parameters, i.e., Gibbs free energy (ΔG), changes in enthalpy (ΔH) and changes in entropy (ΔS) were calculated by the equations:
∆ G = − RT ln K d
ln K d = Δ S R − Δ H RT
where Kd—equilibrium constant of the Langmuir model (L/g), T—absolute temperature (Kelvin, k) and R—universal gas constant (8.314 kJ/mol K). The values of ∆H and ∆S were 5.25 KJ/mol and 34.32 J/mol/K, respectively, taken from the slope and the intercept of the linear plot of ln Kd versus 1/T (Figure 11). ∆H has a positive value, confirming the endothermicity of the adsorption and the positive values of ∆S suggest a randomness increase. A similar endothermic adsorption behavior is found in many pollutant adsorption systems in the literature [80,81]. The change in the Gibbs free energy (ΔG) was −1.8, −1.97 and −2.17 KJ/mol for 30, 40 and 50 °C, respectively. ∆G has a negative value, meaning that the adsorption of As on the MFMNABs is feasible and spontaneous at all temperatures.

3.9. Reusability

Desorption studies were made to assess the regeneration capacity of the adsorbent. It was found that the beads were reusable for six cycles (Figure 12).

3.10. Adsorption Mechanism

The FTIR spectra of MFMNABs (Figure 4) shows a shift in position and intensity of bands at 3432, 2851, 1631, 1414, 1388, 1082, 1028 and 562 cm−1 after adsorption of As(III). These results indicate that the O–H, NH2, C–H, COO−, C = O, C–S–C, C–O and Fe–O groups are involved in the adsorption process.
The FTIR spectra of MFMNPs exhibits bands at 1628 and 1390 cm−1 which is attributed to C = O and C–O stretching vibrations of the amino acid residues, respectively. The peak corresponding to C–H stretching vibrations of methionine is observed at 2870 cm−1. The band around 3400 cm−1 is assigned to the overlapping of N–H and O–H stretching peaks.
The possible interaction of methionine functionalized groups is supposed to be through N, S and O donor atoms and –OH groups, as shown in Figure 13. The carboxylate ion of amino acid can interact with Fe3+ by either bidentate or unidentate modalities, the former being more likely than the latter. N atom of amine group, a potent donor, can make coordinate covalent bond with Fe3+. Sulfur (S) atom is also expected to be a potent donor atom due to its lone pair of electrons [82].
In the acidic pH, the predominant As(III) species, H3AsO3 get adsorbed due to weak Van der Waals forces. At pH 7.0−7.5, adsorption increases due to electrostatic attraction between the positive surface and increase in anionic species. Adsorption may also be due to strong chelation via sulfur and –NH2 groups [72,73]. It may also be attributed to the formation of complex through hydrogen bonding. The shift in the position and decrease in intensity of Fe–O peak indicate the involvement of Fe–O bond also in the adsorption process. The scheme of mechanism of adsorption of As(III) is depicted in Figure 13a and the mechanism of spectrophotometric method used is shown in Figure 13b.

4. Comparisons of Adsorption Capacities (qm) of As(III)

The maximal adsorption capacity (qm) of different adsorbents for the removal of As(III) are presented in Table 5.
Many adsorbents with high adsorption capacity are reported for As (V) as well as total As whereas only few adsorbents with high adsorption capacities are reported for As (III) due to its existence as non-ionic species around 7.0 pH [91]. MFMNABs exhibited high adsorption capacity, in comparison to adsorbents, like guava leaf biomass, mango bark, FHMCA, etc. reported for As(III). A few hybrid materials like polymeric/inorganic fibrous sorbent [90] and zirconium polyacrylamide [91] show higher adsorption capacity; however, they show limitations, such as, being comparatively costlier, use fibrous ion exchangers, need tedious method of fabrication, have removal at low pH (away from general aqueous condition), etc. Hence, the adsorbent methionine functionalized magnetic nanoparticles is more adequate for the adsorption of As(III) from aqueous solutions.

5. Conclusions

The present work provides a cheap and environmentally friendly method for the adsorption of As(III) from aqueous samples. A spectrophotometric method based on the reaction of As(III) with N-bromosuccinimide and rhodamine-B can be used for monitoring the adsorption of As(III). The process efficiency depends on several variables, like temperature, contact time, initial adsorbent concentration and solution pH. The highest adsorption was found at pH 7.0–7.5. The maximal As removal (99.56%) was for the concentration of 10 μg/mL, room temperature (~35 °C), pH 7 and adsorbent dose 1.6 g. The obtained data for As adsorption agrees well with the Freundlich isotherm. The reported modified adsorbent shows good benefits, like good removal efficiency, high adsorption capacity, cheapness, ease of synthesis and availability as well as being promising for the elimination of arsenic from water.

Author Contributions

S.L.: investigation, methodology and writing—original draft; S.B.M.: supervision, conceptualization, formal analysis and validation; A.K.S.: data curation, project administration; resources and software; S.A.C.C.: writing—reviewing and editing and visualization. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Thanks to Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University Research Scholarship (no. 3114/8/Fin./Sch.//2018). This work was also supported by FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P., under the Scientific Employment Stimulus—Institutional Call (CEECINST/00102/2018) and partially supported by the Associate Laboratory for Green Chemistry—LAQV and FCT/MCTES (UIDB/50006/2020 and UIDP/50006/2020).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be provided upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for DST-FIST (New Delhi) sponsored by Department of Chemistry. Thanks to NIT Raipur for XRD studies, SAIF Cochin for FTIR, SEM and TEM analysis and. The authors thankful to the Department of Chemistry of the Govt. V.Y.T. PG Autonomous College, Durg, Chhattishgarh, India for providing the necessary lab facilities.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Xie, L.Y.; Liu, P.; Zheng, Z.Y.; Weng, S.X.; Huang, J.H. Morphology engineering of V2O5/TiO2 nanocomposites with enhanced visible light-driven photofunctions for arsenic removal. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016, 184, 347–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Al Salehin, P.Z.; Farid Moeinpour, F.; Mohseni Shahri, F.S. Adsorption isotherm and thermodynamic studies of As(III) removal from aqueous solutions using used cigarette filter ash. Appl. Water Sci. 2019, 9, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Tien, V.V.; Bay, D.V.; Thu, D.X.; Chung, T.V. Analysis of arsenic from water by spectrophotometric method. Int. J. Dev. Res. 2015, 5, 4987–4991. [Google Scholar]
  4. Lin, G.; Wang, Y.; Li, G.; Wang, S.; Zhang, H.; Li, B. New System for the Spectrophotometric Determination of Arsenic in Water. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Distributed Control and Intelligent Environmental Monitoring (CDCIEM), Changsha, China, 19–20 February 2011; pp. 385–388. [Google Scholar]
  5. Guzman, A.; Nava, J.L.; Coreno, O.; Rodriguez, I.; Gutierrez, S. Arsenic and fluoride removal from groundwater by electrocoagulation using a continuous filter-press reactor. Chemosphere 2016, 144, 2113–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Wu, J.; Zhang, S.D.; Zhu, X.S. Study on the analytical method of inorganic arsenic species in environmental samples. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2019, 17, 7943–7955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sébastien, S. Time to revisit arsenic regulations: Comparing drinking water and rice. BMC Public Health 2014, 14, 465–477. [Google Scholar]
  8. Pandey, G.P.; Singh, A.K.; Prasad, S.; Deshmukha, L.; Asthana, A.; Mathew, S.B.; Yoshida, M. Kinetic determination of trace amount of mercury(II) in environmental samples. Microchem. J. 2016, 128, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nekouei, S.; Nekouei, F. Cloud point extraction and spectrophotometry in the determination of As (III) using amaranth in water samples of rivers located in industrial and non-industrial areas. Curr. Sci. 2014, 107, 1725–1730. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bhattacharya, P.; Welch, A.H.; Stollenwerk, K.G.; McLaughlin, M.J.; Bundschuh, J.; Panaullah, G. Arsenic in the environment: Biology and Chemistry. Sci. Total Environ. 2007, 379, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. WHO. Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality, 4th ed.; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2011; p. 315. [Google Scholar]
  12. Leupin, O.X.; Hug, S.J. Oxidation and removal of arsenic (III) from aerated groundwater by filtration through sand and zero-valent iron. Water Res. 2005, 39, 1729–1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bose, P.; Sharma, A. Role of iron in controlling speciation and mobilization of arsenic in subsurface environment. Water Res. 2002, 36, 4916–4926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Masue, Y.; Loeppert, R.H.; Kramer, T.A. Arsenate and arsenite adsorption and desorption behavior on coprecipitated aluminum: Iron hydroxides. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 837–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Banerjee, K.; Amy, G.L.; Prevost, M. Kinetic and thermodynamic aspects of adsorption of arsenic onto granular ferric hydroxide (GFH). Water Res. 2008, 42, 3371–3378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Sperlich, A.; Werner, A.; Genz, A.; Amy, G.; Worch, E.; Jekel, M. Breakthrough behavior of granular ferric hydroxide (GFH) fixed-bed adsorption filters: Modeling and experimental approaches. Water Res. 2005, 39, 1190–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Yoon, J.; Amy, G.; Chung, J.; Sohn, J.; Yoon, Y. Removal of toxic ions (chromate, arsenate, and perchlorate) using reverse osmosis, nanofiltration, and ultrafiltration membranes. Chemosphere 2009, 77, 228–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sanchez-Cantu, M.; Galicia-Aguilar, J.A.; Santamaria-Juarez, D.; Hernandez-Moreno, L.E. Evaluation of the mixed oxides produced from hydrotalcite-like compound’s thermal treatment in arsenic uptake. Appl. Clay Sci. 2016, 121, 146–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Singh, R.; Singh, S.; Parihar, P.; Singh, V.P.; Prasad, S.M. Arsenic contamination, consequences and remediation techniques: A review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015, 112, 247–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Subramanian, K.S.; Viraraghavan, T.; Phommavong, T.; Tanjore, S. Manganese greensand for removal of arsenic in drinking water. Water Qual. Res. J. Can. 1997, 32, 551–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yoshitake, H.; Yokoi, T.; Tatsumi, T. Adsorption behavior of arsenate at transition metal cations captured by amino-functionalized mesoporous silicas. Chem. Mater. 2003, 15, 1713–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xu, Y.-H.; Nakajima, T.; Ohki, A. Adsorption and removal of arsenic(V) from drinking water by aluminum-loaded Shirasuzeolite. J. Hazard. Mater. 2002, 92, 275–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Elizalde-Gonzalez, M.P.; Mattusch, J.; Einicke, W.-D.; Wennrich, R. Sorption on natural solids for arsenic removal. Chem. Eng. J. 2001, 81, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Elizalde-Gonzalez, M.P.; Mattusch, J.; Wennrich, R. Application of natural zeolites for preconcentration of arsenic species in water samples. J. Environ. Monit. 2001, 3, 22–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Elizalde-Gonz´alez, M.P.; Mattusch, J.; Wennrich, R.; Morgenstern, P. Uptake of arsenite and arsenate by clinoptiloterich tuffs. Micropor. Mesopor. Mat. 2001, 46, 277–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kim, T.Y.; Jin, H.J.; Park, S.S.; Kim, S.J.; Cho, S.Y. Adsorption equilibrium of copper ion and phenol by powdered activated carbon, alginate bead and alginate-activated carbon bead. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2008, 14, 714–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, Y.; Liu, F.; Xia, B.; Du, Q.; Zhang, P.; Wang, D.; Wang, Z.; Xia, Y. Removal of Copper(II) from aqueous solution by carbon nanotube/calcium alginate composites. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 177, 876–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mahmoodi, N.M.; Hayati, B.; Arami, M.; Bahrami, H. Preparation, characterization and dye adsorption properties of biocompatible composite (alginate/titania nanoparticle). Desalination 2011, 275, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rocher, V.; Siaugue, J.M.; Cabuil, V.; Bee, A. Removal of organic dyes by magnetic alginate beads. Water Res. 2008, 25, 1290–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ai, L.H.; Huang, H.Y.; Chen, Z.L.; Wei, X.; Jiang, J. Activated carbon/CoFe2O4 composites: Facile synthesis, magnetic performance and their potential application for the removal of malachite green from water. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 156, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tran, H.V.; Tran, L.D.; Nguyen, T.N. Preparation of chitosan/magnetite composite beads and their application for removal of Pb (II) and Ni (II) from aqueous solution. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2010, 30, 304–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhou, L.; Liu, Z.; Liu, J.; Huang, Q. Adsorption of Hg (II) from aqueous solution by ethylenediamine-modified magnetic crosslinking chitosan microspheres. Desalination 2010, 258, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lakouraj, M.M.; Hasanzadeh, F.; Zare, E.N. Nanogel and super-paramagnetic nanocomposite of thiacalix[4]arene functionalized chitosan: Synthesis, characterization and heavy metal sorption. Iran. Polym. J. 2014, 23, 933–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhou, L.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Huang, Q. Characteristics of equilibrium, kinetics studies for adsorption of Hg(II), Cu(II), and Ni(II) ions by thiourea-modified magnetic chitosan microspheres. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 161, 995–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Bezbaruah, A.N.; Krajangpan, S.; Chisholm, B.J.; Khan, E.; Bermudez, J.J.E. Entrapment of iron nanoparticles in calcium alginate beads for groundwater remediation applications. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 166, 1339–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lakouraj, M.M.; Mojerlou, F.; Zare, E.N. Nanogel and superparamagnetic nanocomposite based on sodium alginate for sorption of heavy metal ions. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 106, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Badruddoza, A.Z.; Rahman, M.T.; Ghosh, S.; Hossain, M.Z.; Shi, J.Z.; Hidajat, K.; Uddin, M.S. β-Cyclodextrin conjugated magnetic, fluorescent silica core-shell nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 95, 449–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, X.B.; Wang, Y.; Yang, S.T. Simultaneous removal of Co(II) and 1-Naphthol by core-shell styructured Fe3O4@cyclodextrin magnetic nanoparticles. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 114, 521–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Idris, A.; Ismail, N.S.M.; Hassan, N.; Misran, E.; Ngomsik, A.F. Synthesis of magnetic alginate beads based on maghemite nanoparticles for Pb(II) removal in aqueous solution. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2012, 18, 1582–1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Palas, R.; Mondal, N.K.; Bhattacharya, S.; Das, B.; Das, K. Removal of arsenic(III) and arsenic(V) on chemically modified low-cost adsorbent: Batch and column operations. Appl. Water Sci. 2013, 3, 293–309. [Google Scholar]
  41. Monárrez-Cordero, B.E.; Amézaga-Madrid, P.; Leyva-Porras, C.C.; Pizá-Ruiz, P.; Miki-Yoshida, M. Study of the Adsorption of Arsenic (III and V) by Magnetite Nanoparticles Synthetized via AACVD. Mater. Res. 2016, 19, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Verma, R.; Asthana, A.; Singh, A.K.; Susan, M.A.B.H. Glycine functionalized magnetic nanoparticle entrapped calcium alginate beads: A promising adsorbent for removal of Cu (II) ions. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 1985–1995. [Google Scholar]
  43. Wang, J.; Pan, K.; He, Q.; Cao, B. Polyacrylonitrile/polypyrrole core/shell nanofiber mat for the removal of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solution. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 244, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Markandeya; Singh, A.; Shukla, S.P.; Mohan, D.; Singh, N.B.; Bhargava, D.S.; Shukla, R.; Pandey, G.; Yadav, V.P.; Kisk, G.C.; et al. Adsorptive capacity of sawdust for the adsorption of MB dye and designing of two-stage batch adsorber. Cogent Environ. Sci. 2015, 1, 1075856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Shukla, S.P.; Tiwari, S.; Tiwari, M.; Mohan, D.; Pandey, G. Removal of fluoride from aqueous solution using Psidium guajava leaves. Desalin. Water Treat. 2017, 62, 418–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Freundlich, H.Z. Over the adsorption in solution. J. Phys. Chem. 1906, 57, 385–470. [Google Scholar]
  47. Langmuir, I. The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1916, 40, 1361–1403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Temkin, M.J.; Pyzhev, V. Kinetics of ammonia synthesis on promoted iron catalysts. Acta Physiochim. URRS 1940, 12, 217–222. [Google Scholar]
  49. Naghizadeh, A.; Ghasemi, F.; Derakhshani, E.; Shahabi, H. Thermodynamic, kinetic and isotherm studies of sulfate removal from aqueous solutions by graphene and graphite nanoparticles. Desalin. Water Treat. 2017, 80, 247–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Naghizadeh, A.; Gholami, K. Bentonite and montmorillonite nanoparticles effectiveness in removal of fluoride from water solutions. J. Water Health 2017, 15, 555–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Kamranifar, M.; Naghizadeh, A. Montmorillonite nanoparticles in removal of textile dyes from aqueous solutions: Study of kinetics and thermodynamics. Iran. J. Chem. Chem. Eng. 2017, 36, 127–137. [Google Scholar]
  52. Lagergren, S. About the theory of so-called adsorption of soluble substances. Kungl. Sven. Vetensk. Handl. 1898, 24, 1–39. [Google Scholar]
  53. Bayramoglu, G.; Gursel, I.; Tunali, Y.; Arica, M.Y. Biosorption of phenol and 2-chlorophenol by Funaliatrogii pellets. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 2685–2691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Viswanathan, N.; Sundaram, C.S.; Meenakshi, S. Development of multifunctional chitosan beads for fluoride removal. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 167, 325–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Chien, S.H.; Clayton, W.R. Application of Elovich Equation to the. Kinetics of Phosphate Release and Sorption in Soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1980, 44, 265–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. JCPDS Data Card. International Center of Diffraction Data; National Bureau of Standards: Washington, DC, USA, 1988.
  57. Zhao, Y.; Qiu, Z.; Huang, J. Preparation and analysis of Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles used as targeted-drug carriers. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2008, 16, 451–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Karimian, A.; Namvar-Mhaboub, M.; Abbasi, R. Methionine-Coated Fe3O4 Nanoparticles: An Efficient and Reusable Nanomagnetic Catalyst for the Synthesis of 5-Substituted 1H-Tetrazoles. Russ. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 56, 1646–1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Singh, M.; Dosanjh, H.S.; Singh, H. Surface modified spinel cobalt ferrite nanoparticles for cationic dye removal: Kinetics and thermodynamics studies. J. Water Process. Eng. 2016, 11, 152–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Verma, S.; Mungse, H.P.; Kumar, N.; Choudhary, S.; Jain, S.L.; Sain, B.; Khatri, O.P. Graphene oxide: An efficient and reusable carbocatalyst for Aza-Michael addition of amines to activated alkenes. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 12673–12675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bera, M.; Gupta, P.; Maji, P.K. Efficacy of ultra-low loading of amine functionalized graphene oxide into glycidol-terminated polyurethane for high-performance composite material. React. Funct. Polym. 2019, 139, 60–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Singh, B.P.; Choudhary, V.; Teotia, S.; Gupta, T.K.; Singh, V.N.; Dhakate, S.R.; Mathur, R.B. Solvent Free, Efficient, Industrially Viable, Fast Dispersion Process Based Amine Modified MWCNT Reinforced Epoxy Composites of Superior Mechanical Properties. Adv. Mater. Lett. 2015, 6, 104–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bindhu, M.R.; Umadevi, M. Green Synthesized Gold Nanoparticles as a Probe for the Detection of Fe3+ Ions in Water. J. Clust. Sci. 2013, 24, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Navarrete, J.T.L.; Hernandez, V.; Ramırez, F.J. Ir and Raman spectra of L-aspartic acid and isotopic derivatives. Biopolymers 1994, 34, 1065–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Tarakeshwar, P.; Manogaran, S. Conformational effects on vibrational frequencies of cysteine and serine: An ab initio study. J. Mol. Struct. Theochem. 1994, 305, 205–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Dennis, G.; Harrison, G.; Agnes, K.; Erastus, G. Effect of Biological Control Antagonists Adsorbed on Chitosan Immobilized Silica Nanocomposite on Ralstonia solanacearum and Growth of Tomato Seedlings. Adv. Res. (AIR) 2016, 6, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Gayathri, P.; Kumar, A.S. An Iron impurity in multiwalled carbon nanotube complexes with chitosan that biomimics the heme-peroxidase function. Chem. Eur. J. 2013, 19, 17103–17112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Wolpert, M.; Hellwig, P. Infrared spectra and molar absorption coefficients of the 20 alpha amino acids in aqueous solutions in the spectral range from 1800 to 500 cm−1. Spectrochim. Acta Part A 2006, 64, 987–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lin, T.; Wu, J. Adsorption of arsenite and arsenate within activated alumina grains: Equilibrium and kinetics. Wat. Res. 2001, 35, 2049–2057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Linh, N.L.M.; Van, D.H.; Duong, T.; Tinh, M.X.; Khieu, D.Q. Adsorption of Arsenate from Aqueous Solution onto Modified Vietnamese Bentonite. Adv. Mater. Sci. 2019, 2019, 2710926. [Google Scholar]
  71. Yusuff, A.S. Adsorption of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solution by Leucaena leucocephala seed pod activated carbon: Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies. Arab J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2019, 26, 89–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Singh, P.; Chauhan, K.; Priya, V.; Singhal, R.K. A greener approach for impressive removal of As(III)/As(V) from an ultra-low concentration using a highly efficient chitosan thiomer as a new adsorbent. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 64946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Belachew, N.; Rama Devi, D.; Basavaiah, K. Facile green synthesis of L-methionine capped magnetite nanoparticles for adsorption of pollutant Rhodamine B. J. Mol. Liq. 2016, 224, 713–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zubair, Y.O.; Fuchida, S.; Tokoro, C. Insight into the Mechanism of Arsenic(III/V) Uptake on Mesoporous Zerovalent Iron−Magnetite Nanocomposites: Adsorption and Microscopic Studies. Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 49755–49767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Ganzagh, M.A.A.; Yousefpour, M.; Taherian, Z. The removal of mercury (II) from water by Ag supported on nanomesoporous silica. J. Chem. Biol. 2016, 9, 127–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Ayranci, E.; Duman, O. Structural effects on the interactions of benzene and naphthalene sulfonates with activated carbon cloth during adsorption from aqueous solutions. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 156, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Duman, O.; Tunç, S.; Polat, T.G. Adsorptive removal of triarylmethane dye (Basic Red 9) from aqueous solution by sepiolite as effective and low-cost adsorbent. Appl. Clay Sci. 2015, 109, 22–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Duman, O.; Ayranci, E. Adsorptive removal of cationic surfactants from aqueous solutions onto high-area activated carbon cloth monitored by in situ UV spectroscopy. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 174, 359–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Hassan, A.F.; Abdel-Mohsen, A.M.; Elhadidy, H. Adsorption of arsenic by activated carbon, calcium alginate and their composite beads. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014, 68, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wang, Z.; Zhu, H.; Wang, X.; Yang, F.; Yang, X. One-pot green synthesis of biocompatible arginine-stabilized magnetic nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 2009, 20, 465606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Duman, O.; Tunç, S.; Polat, T.G. Determination of adsorptive properties of expanded vermiculite for the removal of C. I. Basic Red 9 from aqueous solution: Kinetic, isotherm and thermodynamic studies. Micropor. Mesopor. Mat. 2015, 210, 176–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Duman, O.; Polat, T.G.; Diker, C.Ö.; Tunç, S. Agar/κ-carrageenan composite hydrogel adsorbent for the removal of Methylene Blue from water. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 160, 823–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Mohan, D.; Dey, S.; Dwivedi, S.B.; Shukla, S.P. Adsorption of arsenic using low cost adsorbents: Guava leaf biomass, mango bark and bagasse. Curr. Sci. 2019, 117, 649–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Sarkar, P.; Pal, P.; Bhattacharyay, D.; Banerjee, S. Removal of arsenic from drinking water by ferric hydroxide microcapsule-loaded alginate beads in packed adsorption column. J. Environ. Sci. Health A 2010, 45, 1750–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Rahdar, S.; Taghavi, M.; Khaksefidi, R.; Ahmadi, S. Adsorption of arsenic (V) from aqueous solution using modified saxaul ash: Isotherm and thermodynamic study. Appl. Water Sci. 2019, 87, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Ociński, D.; Jacukowicz-Sobala, I.; Kociołek-Balawejder, E. Alginate beads containing water treatment residuals for arsenic removal from water formation and adsorption studies. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 24527–24539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Alarcon, M.; Lopez, M. Technical feasibility of using magnetic nanoparticles obtained from metallic wool for arsenite (As (III)) removal from aqueous solutions. J. Nanosci. Technol. 2016, 4, 35–43. [Google Scholar]
  88. Rahman, S.; Yanful, E. Arsenic and chromium removal by mixed magnetite-maghemite nanoparticles and the effect of phosphate on removal. J. Environ. Manag. 2011, 11, 2238–2247. [Google Scholar]
  89. Joshi, S.; Kumari, A.; Banjara, A.; Sharma, M. Use of iron oxide/activated carbon magnetic composite for adsorptive removal of arsenic from water. Int. J. Adv. Eng. 2019, 1, 9–16. [Google Scholar]
  90. Vatutsina, O.M.; Soldatov, V.S.; Sokolova, V.I.; Johann, J.; Bissen, M.; Weissenbacher, A. A new hybrid (polymer/inorganic) fibrous sorbent for arsenic removal from drinking water. React. Funct. Polym. 2007, 67, 184–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Mandal, S.; Sahu, M.K.; Patel, R.K. Adsorption studies of arsenic(III) removal from water by zirconium polyacrylamide hybrid material (ZrPACM-43). Water Resour. Ind. 2013, 4, 51–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Maji, S.K.; Pal, A.; Pal, T. Arsenic removal from real-life groundwater by adsorption on laterite soil. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 151, 811–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 11 01345 g001 550
Figure 1. Synthetic pathway of MFMNABs.
Figure 1. Synthetic pathway of MFMNABs.
Nanomaterials 11 01345 g001
Nanomaterials 11 01345 g002 550
Figure 2. XRD diffractograms of MFMNPs and MFMNABs (before and after adsorption).
Figure 2. XRD diffractograms of MFMNPs and MFMNABs (before and after adsorption).
Nanomaterials 11 01345 g002
Nanomaterials 11 01345 g003 550
Figure 3. Size distribution curve of MFMNABs.
Figure 3. Size distribution curve of MFMNABs.
Nanomaterials 11 01345 g003
Nanomaterials 11 01345 g004 550
Figure 4. The FT-IR spectra of (A) MFMNPs, (B) MFMNABs-before adsorption and (C) MFMNABs-after adsorption.
Figure 4. The FT-IR spectra of (A) MFMNPs, (B) MFMNABs-before adsorption and (C) MFMNABs-after adsorption.
Nanomaterials 11 01345 g004
Nanomaterials 11 01345 g005a 550Nanomaterials 11 01345 g005b 550
Figure 5. The SEM images of (a,b) MFMNPs, (c,d) MFMNABs (before adsorption) and (e,f) MFMNABs (after adsorption) under different magnification.
Figure 5. The SEM images of (a,b) MFMNPs, (c,d) MFMNABs (before adsorption) and (e,f) MFMNABs (after adsorption) under different magnification.
Nanomaterials 11 01345 g005aNanomaterials 11 01345 g005b
Nanomaterials 11 01345 g006 550
Figure 6. Transmission Electron Micrograph (TEM) (a) and SAED patterns (b) of MFMNABs.
Figure 6. Transmission Electron Micrograph (TEM) (a) and SAED patterns (b) of MFMNABs.
Nanomaterials 11 01345 g006
Nanomaterials 11 01345 g007 550
Figure 7. (a) pH effect on the adsorption of As(III) by MFMNABs at initial concentration of 10 µg/mL, adsorbent dose; 1.0 g, contact time; 110 min and, (b) pHpzc (point zero charge) of MFMNABs.
Figure 7. (a) pH effect on the adsorption of As(III) by MFMNABs at initial concentration of 10 µg/mL, adsorbent dose; 1.0 g, contact time; 110 min and, (b) pHpzc (point zero charge) of MFMNABs.
Nanomaterials 11 01345 g007
Nanomaterials 11 01345 g008 550
Figure 8. Effect of Adsorbent dose (a) contact time (b) and initial concentration (c) on the % removal using MFMNABs. Conditions: (a) 10 µg/mL As(III) concentration; pH 7, contact time 110 min, (b) As(III) 10 µg/mL; adsorbent dose 1.6 g; and pH 7 and (c) Adsorbent dose; 1.6 g, contact time 110 min and pH 7.
Figure 8. Effect of Adsorbent dose (a) contact time (b) and initial concentration (c) on the % removal using MFMNABs. Conditions: (a) 10 µg/mL As(III) concentration; pH 7, contact time 110 min, (b) As(III) 10 µg/mL; adsorbent dose 1.6 g; and pH 7 and (c) Adsorbent dose; 1.6 g, contact time 110 min and pH 7.
Nanomaterials 11 01345 g008
Nanomaterials 11 01345 g009 550
Figure 9. Adsorption isotherms of (A) Langmuir, (B) Freundlich and (C) Temkin for As(III) adsorption onto MFMNABs.
Figure 9. Adsorption isotherms of (A) Langmuir, (B) Freundlich and (C) Temkin for As(III) adsorption onto MFMNABs.
Nanomaterials 11 01345 g009
Nanomaterials 11 01345 g010 550
Figure 10. Adsorption of As(III) onto MFMNABs fitted with the pseudo-first order (A), pseudo-second order (B) intra-particle diffusion (C) and Elovich (D) models.
Figure 10. Adsorption of As(III) onto MFMNABs fitted with the pseudo-first order (A), pseudo-second order (B) intra-particle diffusion (C) and Elovich (D) models.
Nanomaterials 11 01345 g010
Nanomaterials 11 01345 g011 550
Figure 11. Van’t Hoff’s plot for adsorption of As(III) on MFMNABs.
Figure 11. Van’t Hoff’s plot for adsorption of As(III) on MFMNABs.
Nanomaterials 11 01345 g011
Nanomaterials 11 01345 g012 550
Figure 12. Relationship between the % removal of As(III) and reuse cycles of MFMNABs.
Figure 12. Relationship between the % removal of As(III) and reuse cycles of MFMNABs.
Nanomaterials 11 01345 g012
Nanomaterials 11 01345 g013 550
Figure 13. Mechanism of As(III) adsorption on MFMNABs (a) and reactions used to study the adsorption (b).
Figure 13. Mechanism of As(III) adsorption on MFMNABs (a) and reactions used to study the adsorption (b).
Nanomaterials 11 01345 g013
Table
Table 1. Crystal size values obtained by the Debye-Scherrer’s formula.
Table 1. Crystal size values obtained by the Debye-Scherrer’s formula.
SubstanceMost Intense Peak (2θ, Degree)Most Intense Peak
(θ, Degree)		hklFWHM * of Most Intense Peak (β, Radian)Size of the Particles (D, nm)
MFMNPs35.7717.883110.014417.04
MFMNABs (Before adsorption)35.1817.593110.03512.95
MFMNABs (After adsorption)35.6617.833110.01320.68
FWHM * Full width at half maximum height.
Table
Table 2. Comparison of d-spacing and particle size (D) obtained from HR-TEM and XRD.
Table 2. Comparison of d-spacing and particle size (D) obtained from HR-TEM and XRD.
HR-TEMXRD
d-spacing (nm)D (nm)d-spacing (nm)D (nm)
0.24212.680.25412.95
Table
Table 3. Adsorption isotherm parameters for As(III) adsorption by MFMNABs.
Table 3. Adsorption isotherm parameters for As(III) adsorption by MFMNABs.
IsothermValues of Parameters
Langmuirqmax (mg g−1)
6.6533		KL
0.0975		R2
0.989		RL
0.3389
FreundlichKF (mg g−1) (mg L−1)n
0.7919		n
1.1507		R2
0.9682		-
TemkinB1
0.4625		KT (L mg−1)
0.3984		R2
0.9711		-
Table
Table 4. Kinetic parameters for adsorption of As(III) onto MFMNABs.
Table 4. Kinetic parameters for adsorption of As(III) onto MFMNABs.
ModelsKinetics Parameters
Pseudo-First-Orderk1 (min−1)qe (mg g−1)R2
0.02232.4920.9317
Pseudo-Second-
Order		k2 (g mg−1 min−1)qe (mg g−1)R2
0.080.11770.9998
Intra-particle
Diffusion		kd (mg g−1 min−1)C (mg g−1)R2
8.04560.10990.9758
Elovich modelA (mg g−1 min−2)β (g mg−1 min−1)R2
1.010350.3970.9601
Table
Table 5. Comparison of the adsorption capacity of different adsorbents.
Table 5. Comparison of the adsorption capacity of different adsorbents.
AdsorbentsAdsorption Capacity (mg/g)References
Guava leaf biomass1.05[83]
Mango bark1.25[83]
Bagasse1.35[83]
Ferric hydroxide microcapsule-loaded alginate beads (FHMCA)3.80[84]
Modified saxaul ash4.20[85]
WTRs (water treatment residuals) loaded alginate beads3.40[86]
Iron impregnated AC from Lapsi seed stone2.00[87]
Magnetic nanoparticle obtained from metallic wool2.20[88]
Magnetite-maghemite nanoparticle3.69[89]
Hybrid (polymeric/inorganic) fibrous sorbent75.67[90]
Hybrid material zirconium polyacrylamide (ZrPACM-43)41.48[91]
Laterite soil (batch adsorption and fixed bed column)0.18
69.22		[92]
Methionine functionalized magnetic nanoparticles6.65Present study
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lilhare, S.; Mathew, S.B.; Singh, A.K.; Carabineiro, S.A.C. Calcium Alginate Beads with Entrapped Iron Oxide Magnetic Nanoparticles Functionalized with Methionine—A Versatile Adsorbent for Arsenic Removal. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1345. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11051345

AMA Style

Lilhare S, Mathew SB, Singh AK, Carabineiro SAC. Calcium Alginate Beads with Entrapped Iron Oxide Magnetic Nanoparticles Functionalized with Methionine—A Versatile Adsorbent for Arsenic Removal. Nanomaterials. 2021; 11(5):1345. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11051345

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lilhare, Surbhi, Sunitha B. Mathew, Ajaya K. Singh, and Sónia A. C. Carabineiro. 2021. "Calcium Alginate Beads with Entrapped Iron Oxide Magnetic Nanoparticles Functionalized with Methionine—A Versatile Adsorbent for Arsenic Removal" Nanomaterials 11, no. 5: 1345. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11051345

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop