Next Article in Journal
Tandem Structures Semiconductors Based on TiO2_SnO2 and ZnO_SnO2 for Photocatalytic Organic Pollutant Removal
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Size and Shape on Electrochemical Performance of Nano-Silicon-Based Lithium Battery
Previous Article in Journal
Changes in Optical Properties upon Dye–Clay Interaction: Experimental Evaluation and Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Recent Progress of Black Silicon: From Fabrications to Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Hydration Characteristics of Tricalcium Aluminate in the Presence of Nano-Silica

1
Key Laboratory for Resilient Infrastructures of Coastal Cities (Ministry of Education), Underground Polis Academy, College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
2
Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong 999077, China
3
School of Architecture and Built Environment, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2021, 11(1), 199; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11010199
Submission received: 4 December 2020 / Revised: 7 January 2021 / Accepted: 12 January 2021 / Published: 14 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Silica and Silicon Based Nanostructures)

Abstract

:
Tricalcium aluminate (C3A) is the most reactive component of the Portland cement and its hydration has an important impact on the workability and early strength of concrete. Recently, nanomaterials such as nano-silica (nano-SiO2) have attracted much attention in cement-based materials because of its pozzolanic reactivity and the pore-filling effect. However, its influence on the hydration of C3A needs to be well understood. In this study, the hydration kinetics of C3A mixed with different percentages of nano-SiO2 were studied and compared with pure C3A. The hydration products were examined by different characterization techniques including XRD, XPS, and NMR spectroscopy and isothermal calorimetry analyses. The XRD results showed that the addition of nano-SiO2 promoted the conversion of the intermediate product C4AH13. The isothermal calorimetry results showed that the addition of nano-SiO2 significantly reduced the hydration exotherm rate of C3A from 0.34 to less than 0.1 mW/g. With the presence of nano-SiO2, the peaks for Q1 were observed in 29Si MAS-NMR measurements, and the content of Q1 increased from 6.74% to 30.6% when the nano-SiO2 content increased from 2 wt.% to 8 wt.%, whereas the proportion of Q4 gradually decreased from 89.1% to 63.6%. These results indicated a pozzolanic reaction provoked by the nano-SiO2 combined with aluminate structures generating C-A-S-H gel.

1. Introduction

It is well known that the macroscopic properties of a cement-based material are a consequence of how the constituent particles are arranged and held together at micro- and nano-scales. Many studies have been using nanomaterials such as nano-SiO2, nano-Al2O3, and nano-TiO2 to improve the microstructure performance of cement-based materials [1,2]. However, most of them focused the impact of nanomaterials on the hydration of tricalcium silicate (C3S) only [3], not on tricalcium aluminate (C3A), which is the most intense hydration mineral component in cement. Though the typical proportion of C3A in cement is only about 10 wt.% [4], it is the most reactive component of the Portland cement.
C3A, together with alite (C3S), belite (C2S), and ferrite (C4AF), are the main components of cement. Compared to C3S, the hydration of C3A is significantly faster, forming calcium hydroaluminates and other phases such as calcium hydroaluminate-ferrite, commonly called AFm [5]. However, the fast reaction, often named “flash setting” [6], will reduce the workability and strength of the final products, which is usually avoided by adding gypsum [4,5]. The sulfate in gypsum binds C3A, generating sulfoaluminates instead of calcium hydroaluminates [7]. The reactions of C3A with and without calcium sulfate are expressed as Equations (1)–(3) (in cement notation) [8,9]:
C3A + 3CS + 32H → C6AS3H32 (Ettringite)
C6AS3H32 + 2C3A + 4H2O → 3C4ASH12 (Monosulphate)
C3A + H → C2AH8 + C4AH13 → C3AH6
It is well-known that nano-SiO2 in cement can increase the density of the C-S-H gel and decrease the final porosity of the hydrated products [10,11]. Besides, it can reduce the amount of calcium hydroxide formation, as well as the setting time [12,13], and thus increase the hydration degree of cement [14,15] to obtain the best mechanical performance. All the above-mentioned advantages are achieved through the three mechanisms of nano-SiO2: The nucleation reaction, pozzolanic effect, and pore-filling effect. Nano-SiO2 can act as a nucleation site for C-S-H seeds, accelerating cement hydration. At the same time, nano-SiO2 particles can generate C-S-H gel by undertaking pozzolanic reaction that further intensifies the growth of C-S-H gels in the matrix and consequently increases the final density [16,17]. The pozzolanic reaction is the reaction between nano-SiO2 and calcium hydroxide, which allows the generation of C-S-H gel as expressed in Equations (4) and (5). In addition, the nano-SiO2 particles can fill up micro-pores to reduce the overall porosity of the final products [18,19].
SiO2 + H2O → Si(OH)4
Ca(OH)2 + Si(OH)4 → C-S-H
However, to our knowledge, research about the effect of nano-SiO2 on C3A hydration remains limited. A few works in the literature postulate that the pozzolanic reaction of nano-SiO2 in a high-aluminum environment may generate C-A-S-H gel, similar to C-S-H gel, where some of the silicon tetrahedrons could be replaced by aluminum [20,21]. The main objective of this research is to study the effects of nano-SiO2 on the hydration of C3A and its hydrated products. It is worth noting that the Al/Si ratio used in this study was much higher than previous studies as the aluminum was not the substitute element [22].
In this research, X-ray diffraction (XRD) was used to determine the final hydration products of C3A with different contents of nano-SiO2. Besides, the isothermal calorimetry was chosen to examine the intensity and speed of different amounts of nano-SiO2 on the heat flow of C3A hydration. An X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (XPS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) were used to reveal the microstructure of the hydrated products. It is believed that the findings of this study can help to prove the existence of the C-A-S-H gel and other alterations in the hydration products of C3A with different contents of nano-SiO2.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The C3A with a purity of 99 wt.%, employed in this experiment, was purchased from a company in Shanghai. The nano-SiO2 with a purity of 99.5 wt.% and an average particle size of 15 ± 5 nm was provided by Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd. Figure 1a shows the XRD pattern of the pure C3A with high and well-defined peaks, which proved to be cubic C3A according to PDF#38-1429. In addition, the SEM image in Figure 1b shows that the size of the pure C3A particle is about 10 μm. On the other hand, as seen in Figure 1c, the curve of pure nano-SiO2 shows a hump at 20–25°, indicating that the nano-SiO2 used in this study had noncrystallinity and high activity [23]. Therefore, XRD analysis can confirm that both nano-SiO2 and pure C3A were of high purity. Although the nano-SiO2 nanoparticles tended to agglomerate, an average size of about 10 nm could be measured from the TEM image, as shown in Figure 1d.

2.2. Sample Preparation

In this study, five mixes of pure C3A with different nano-SiO2 contents (0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 wt.%) were prepared as indicated in Table 1. The samples were prepared through the following procedures: Initially, the specific amounts of C3A and nano-SiO2 in powder form were weighed and premixed. Then, the mixture was placed in a glass flask filled with deionized water and mixed continuously by a magnetic stirrer for 72 h. The speed of stirring was 800 rpm and the liquid-to-solid ratio (L/S) was kept constant at 50. It is worth emphasizing that the glass flask was always filled with nitrogen during the 72 h hydration process to prevent possible carbonization and impurities in the air. After 72 h, the samples were removed from the stirring platform and filtered using a 7 cm filter paper and a suction filter glass. Then, the samples were placed into a vacuum oven and allowed to dry for 7 days at a temperature of 40 °C. The dried samples were kept sealed for later testing.

2.3. Methods

X-ray diffraction (XRD, D8 Advance, Bruker, Germany) was used to determine the mineralogical composition of raw materials and hydration products of C3A (with and without nano-SiO2). A scanning rate of 0.08 °/s from 5° to 70° with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å) was used, as well as a screen to prevent high background at small degrees.
Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM, TALOS F200X, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM, TM 250 FEG, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) were employed to determine the particle characteristics of the raw samples.
A Thermal Activity Monitor (TAM-AIR, TA Instruments, New Castle, Delaware, USA), equipment for isothermal calorimetry, was employed to analyze the heat flow produced during the hydration of the samples. The samples were prepared using 0.5 g of C3A and the corresponding percentages of nano-SiO2 with a water-to-solid ratio of 5. Prior to the hydration process, the samples in powder form were kept inside the device for 3–4 h until the calorimeter was stabilized. Then, the distilled water was added and the mixtures were stirred for 30 s to begin the hydration.
The solid-state Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (MAS-NMR, JEOL-600, Japan) technique was used in two different modes. The first mode was 29Si MAS-NMR that employed single-pulse decoupling including 1024 scans with a relaxation delay of 60 s. The probe was 8 mm in diameter and the spinning speed was 5000 rpm. The second mode was 27Al MAS-NMR, a single pulse with 1000 scans, and 10 s of relaxation time. The probe was 3.2 mm in diameter and the spinning speed was 12,000 rpm. The references used to calibrate the peaks were TSPA and AlK (SO4) for 29Si and 27Al, respectively.
The X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (XPS, Thermo escalab XI+) was employed to verify the molecular structure of the hydration products and record the measurements with a monochromatic Al Kα (hν = 1486.6 eV) X-ray source, employing a flare area of 650 µm, calibrated by 284.8 eV C1s. A constant analyzer pass energy of 20 eV was applied.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Mineral Composition Analysis

The XRD analysis of the hydrated samples can be seen in Figure 2. In agreement with the literature [24,25], the majority of the peaks found in the results were related to Katoite (written as Ca3Al2(OH)12 or C3AH6), which is one of the final forms of the C3A hydration, indicating a good reaction process of C3A. Another peak at 11.5° found in all the samples was related to C4AH13, which is an intermediate form during the hydration of C3A. The small peak at 47.5° was only found in the hydration products of pure C3A, which may be related to the carbonation of C3A hydration products. Besides, another peak at 33.2° is associated with anhydrate C3A, indicating that the hydration of pure C3A was incomplete. The intensity of this peak was reduced after adding 2 wt.% of nano-SiO2 and even smaller when the nano-SiO2 content increased to 4 wt.%. Furthermore, this peak disappeared completely in the samples of C3A with 6 wt.% and 8 wt.% nano-SiO2. This result substantiates the promotion effect of nano-SiO2 on the hydration process of C3A.

3.2. Hydration Exothermic Analysis

The effect of nano-SiO2 on the hydration heat release rate of C3A was studied using the isothermal calorimetry, and the results can be seen in Figure 3. De Jong et al. [26] previously found a second exothermic peak observed in the C3A hydration process after adding amorphous silica, which appeared in the first hours of hydration but being at later stage when the amorphous silica content increased. However, as shown in Figure 3a, this study showed different results. It can be seen from Figure 3b that the pure C3A sample showed the highest reactivity and the peak in hydration heat release rate occurred at 420 s. When 2 wt.% nano-SiO2 was added to the C3A hydration system, the hydration heat release rate of C3A was greatly reduced from 0.34 to less than 0.1 mW/g. The hydration rate can be further reduced with increasing nano-SiO2 content, but the significance is not obvious. With 2 wt.% nano-SiO2, the hydration exothermic peak was delayed by more than 2 min. In addition, a further delay was noted with the increase in the nano-SiO2 content. Xu et al. [3] stated that the addition of nano-SiO2 will accelerate the rate of heat release in the early stage of C3S hydration. However, the opposite phenomenon occurred during the C3A hydration process. The reduction in heat release can be attributed to two reasons: (1) The hydration reaction rate of C3A was much higher than that of C3S, and the surface of the C3A particles was adsorbed with a large amount of nano-SiO2 with high specific surface area, which would reduce the contact area between C3A and water, thus slowing down the reaction rate [27]; (2) the surface of C3A particles was covered by the C-A-S-H gels (generated by the pozzolanic reaction of nano-SiO2 combined with C3A), thereby reducing the reaction rate. This is consistent with the phenomenon that the appearance time of the C3A hydration exothermic peak continuously delayed as the amount of nano-SiO2 increased. Hou et al. [28] explored the influence of nano-SiO2 on the hydration process of C3A-gypsum and C3A-C3S-gypsum systems, and obtained similar conclusions. They believed that the nano-SiO2 adsorbed on the surface of C3A due to the electrostatic effect is the reason for the delayed hydration. At the same time, the C-S-H gel generated by the pozzolanic effect of nano-SiO2 can cover the surface of C3A, which will also inhibit the hydration heat release rate of C3A.

3.3. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Results

The XPS was performed to analyze the binding energies of Al 2p and Si 2p in the hydration products of C3A with different nano-SiO2 contents. For Al 2p, previous work has indicated that the binding energy of octahedral coordinated aluminum is generally higher than that of the tetrahedral form [29]. It can be seen from Figure 4a that the Al 2p binding energy of the pure C3A hydration products was around 74.1 eV, which can be related to C3AH6 [30,31]. All the samples containing nano SiO2, except C3A-8 wt.%, gave similar results showing a unique peak around 74.1 eV. The sample of C3A with 8 wt.% nano-SiO2 presented a peak around 74.3 eV. It can be inferred that the amount of 8 wt.% nano-SiO2 was enough to influence the binding energy of C3A hydration products. It also indicated that the reaction between nano-SiO2 and C3A could create an Al-O-Si bond as Al would migrate to Si due to its high electronegativity, thus increasing the Al 2p binding energy [32]. On the other hand, the binding energy of Si 2p in all hydration products is shown in Figure 4b. It can be seen from the figure that the Si 2p binding energy of pure nano-SiO2 is 103.6 eV, while the Si 2p binding energy of C3A with 2 wt.% nano-SiO2, however, showed a very low intensity, almost being a plateau. This phenomenon indicates that there is Al element insertion in the silicon chain, which leads to a substantial decrease in Si 2p binding energy. Besides, the Si 2p binding energy rebounded with the amount of nano-SiO2 increased. When the nano-SiO2 content increased to 4 wt.%, 6 wt.%, and 8 wt.%, the Si 2p binding energy rebounded to 101.8, 101.9, and 102.3 eV, respectively, and the peaks became more obvious. This phenomenon could prove the formation of Al-O-Si bonds when nano-SiO2 was added to C3A. Overall, the Si 2p results are consistent with the Al 2p binding energy results, and are in good agreement with the previous findings [33,34].

3.4. Structural Changes Observed by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance

The NMR spectroscopy was performed with the intention of finding relevant information to prove a possible alteration in the hydration products structures brought by nano-SiO2 [35]. Figure 5 shows the 29Si and 27Al MAS-NMR results of all samples, in order to reveal the effect of nano-SiO2 on the structure of C3A hydration products. As shown in Figure 5a, all the hydration samples showed similar 27Al MAS-NMR results with a unique peak at 12.18 ppm, which is related to the octahedral aluminum configuration in the C3AH6 component [8,36,37]. The absence of any shift in the peak can lead to the conclusion that the presence of nano-SiO2 would not alter the original structure formed by the C3A hydration [35].
However, the 29Si MAS-NMR results shown in Figure 5b are different from the 27Al MAS-NMR results. The peaks were labeled as Qn, where “n” is the number of similar tetrahedrons connected in the molecule. For example, Q0 refers to a silicon tetrahedral configuration completely insolated to other silicon, whereas Q2 refers to a silicon tetrahedral configuration connected with another two silicon tetrahedrons, forming a chain of silicon, as illustrated in Figure 6. According to the 29Si MAS-NMR results, the two peaks observed around −79.2 and −112.5 ppm were Q1 and Q4, respectively. In this context, Q1 implies the existence of a silicon tetrahedron in the final position of a chain [38,39,40,41]. Sometimes, this peak is found in a more negative value (around −81 ppm) [39,42]. This chemical shift is in agreement with the presence of aluminum in the environment of silicon tetrahedra to reach more positive ppm values [42,43]. This is a good indicator of the generation of dimers, combining silicon and aluminum tetrahedra. The intensity of this peak grew considerably with nano-SiO2 content, owing to the larger amount of dimers generated within the structure. The peak Q4 refers to the presence of a “three-dimensional” net of silicon tetrahedra in the sample [44,45], and is strongly related to nano-SiO2 [23,46]. In the Q1 peak, there is a shift to more positive values due to the presence of aluminum within the close environment of the silicon tetrahedron. Additionally, new peaks were found in some of the samples. The Q0 peak appeared in hydration products of C3A with 6 wt.% and 8 wt.% nano SiO2, which is associated with silicon tetrahedra completely insolated. Due to this peak only being found in samples with a high percentage of nano-SiO2, this could imply that some silicon ions from the dissolution of the nano-SiO2 were not integrated into the C-A-S-H structure.
The percentages of different Qn peaks obtained by Gaussian deconvolution are shown in Figure 7. It is quite clear to show that the existence of Q0 depends on nano-SiO2 content. On the other hand, the proportion of Q1 increased rapidly from 6.74% to 30.6% when the amount of nano-SiO2 increased from 2 wt.% to 8 wt.%. However, the proportion of Q4 gradually decreased from 89.1% to 63.6% correspondingly. This finding implies that the higher the nano-SiO2 content, the more silicon dimers in hydration products can be formed. Additionally, the positions of the Q4 peaks were slightly shifted to more negative values from −112.63 to −113.53 ppm as the nano-SiO2 content increased from 2 to 8 wt.%. This observation is in agreement with the trend of the position of the pure nano-SiO2 Q4 peak, around −115 ppm [23]. In addition, not all the silicon tetrahedra would be influenced by aluminum with a high content of nano-SiO2, and the shift to more positive values created by the aluminum would become weaker.
Owing to the C-A-S-H gel being amorphous, its presence can only be revealed by the apparition of the Q1 29Si MAS NMR peak and the shifted Q4 to more positive values under the influence of aluminum. Based on the findings from this study, it is safe to say that nano-SiO2 can promote the apparition of C-A-S-H gel in the final hydration products of C3A, besides the C3AH6 structure.

4. Conclusions and Recommendations

This study examined the effect of nano-SiO2 on the hydration of C3A in cement. According to the test results, the following conclusions are drawn:
(1)
The addition of nano-SiO2 can promote the hydration degree of C3A while significantly reducing the heat release rate of C3A hydration from 0.34 to less than 0.1 mW/g, and the occurrence time of the hydration exothermic peak was delayed by more than 2 min. The main reasons are probably the surface of C3A being adsorbed by nano-SiO2 and/or covered by the C-A-S-H gel (formed by the pozzolanic hydration reaction of nano-SiO2 and C3A) at an early age, thereby reducing the contact area of C3A with water.
(2)
The reaction between nano-SiO2 and C3A can establish Si-O-Al bonds and generate C-A-S-H gels. The chemical shifts in Al 2p and Si 2p both confirm this conclusion. In addition, 29Si MAS-NMR results showed that Q1 appeared after the nano-SiO2 was added to the C3A hydration system. With the nano-SiO2 content increased, the proportion of Q1 in the hydration product increased from 6.74% to 30.6%, while the proportion of Q4 gradually decreased from 89.1% to 63.6%.
(3)
The addition of nano-silica can promote the hydration reaction rate of C3S while delaying the hydration of C3A. For the two hydration systems of C3A and C3S, the addition of nano-SiO2 has shown completely different effects, and the influence mechanism of nano-SiO2 in the two different hydration processes needs further exploration.

Author Contributions

D.Z.: Methodology, data analysis, writing; M.M.: Experiments, data and image processing, writing; W.F.: Tests; W.T.: Language correction; H.C.: Research plan formulation, draft reviewing; Z.D.: Draft reviewing and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant No: 51708363) and National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFC1907203).

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial supports of the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant No: 51708363) and National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFC1907203).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

C3ATricalcium aluminate
C3STricalcium silicate, alite
C2SDicalcium silicate, belite
C4AFTetracalcium aluminate, ferrite
CSCalcium sulfate, CaSO4
C-S-HCalcium silicate hydrate
C-A-S-HCalcium silicoaluminate hydrate
C6AS3H32, AftEttringite
3C4ASH12, AFmMonosulfate
Ca3Al2(OH)12, or C3AH6Calcium aluminium hydrate
C4AH13/C2AH8Calcium aluminium hydrate

References

  1. Li, H.; Du, T.; Xiao, H.; Zhang, Q. Crystallization of calcium silicate hydrates on the surface of nanomaterials. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2017, 100, 3227–3238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Borrmann, T.; Johnston, J.H.; McFarlane, A.J.; Richardson, M.J.; O’Connor, S.J. Nano-structured calcium silicate hydrate functionalised with iodine. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2009, 339, 175–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Xu, Z.; Zhou, Z.; Du, P.; Cheng, X. Effects of nano-silica on hydration properties of tricalcium silicate. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 125, 1169–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hewlett, P.; Liska, M. Lea’s Chemistry of Cement and Concrete; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  5. Quennoz, A.; Scrivener, K.L. Hydration of C3A–gypsum systems. Cem. Concr. Res. 2012, 42, 1032–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Maier, A.-K.; Dezmirean, L.; Will, J.; Greil, P. Three-dimensional printing of flash-setting calcium aluminate cement. J. Mater. Sci. 2011, 46, 2947–2954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Manzano, H.; Dolado, J.S.; Ayuela, A. Structural, mechanical, and reactivity properties of tricalcium aluminate using first-principles calculations. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2009, 92, 897–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Skibsted, J.; Henderson, E.; Jakobsen, H.J. Characterization of calcium aluminate phases in cements by aluminum-27 MAS NMR spectroscopy. Inorg. Chem. 1993, 32, 1013–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gismera-Diez, S.; Manchobas-Pantoja, B.; Carmona-Quiroga, P.M.; Blanco-Varela, M. Effect of BaCO3 on C3A hydration. Cem. Concr. Res. 2015, 73, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Nunes, C.; Slížková, Z.; Stefanidou, M.; Němeček, J. Microstructure of lime and lime-pozzolana pastes with nanosilica. Cem. Concr. Res. 2016, 83, 152–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Singh, L.; Ali, D.; Sharma, U. Studies on optimization of silica nanoparticles dosage in cementitious system. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2016, 70, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, Y.; Deng, Y.-F.; Li, M.-Q. Influence of nano-SiO2 on the consistency, setting time, early-age strength, and shrinkage of composite cement pastes. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 1-8. [Google Scholar]
  13. Shih, J.-Y.; Chang, T.-P.; Hsiao, T.-C. Effect of nanosilica on characterization of Portland cement composite. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2006, 424, 266–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gu, Y.; Ran, Q.; Shu, X.; Yu, C.; Chang, H.; Liu, J. Synthesis of nanoSiO2@ PCE core-shell nanoparticles and its effect on cement hydration at early age. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 114, 673–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wu, Z.; Shi, C.; Khayat, K.H.; Wan, S. Effects of different nanomaterials on hardening and performance of ultra-high strength concrete (UHSC). Cem. Concr. Compos. 2016, 70, 24–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Wu, Z.-Q.; Young, J. The hydration of tricalcium silicate in the presence of colloidal silica. J. Mater. Sci. 1984, 19, 3477–3486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Singh, L.; Bhattacharyya, S.; Shah, S.P.; Mishra, G.; Ahalawat, S.; Sharma, U. Studies on early stage hydration of tricalcium silicate incorporating silica nanoparticles: Part I. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 74, 278–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bentz, D.P.; Hansen, A.S.; Guynn, J.M. Optimization of cement and fly ash particle sizes to produce sustainable concretes. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2011, 33, 824–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kong, D.; Corr, D.J.; Hou, P.; Yang, Y.; Shah, S.P. Influence of colloidal silica sol on fresh properties of cement paste as compared to nano-silica powder with agglomerates in micron-scale. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2015, 63, 30–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Puertas, F.; Palacios, M.; Manzano, H.; Dolado, J.; Rico, A.; Rodríguez, J. A model for the CASH gel formed in alkali-activated slag cements. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2011, 31, 2043–2056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Garcia-Lodeiro, I.; Palomo, A.; Fernández-Jiménez, A.; Macphee, D. Compatibility studies between NASH and CASH gels. Study in the ternary diagram Na2O–CaO–Al2O3–SiO2–H2O. Cem. Concr. Res. 2011, 41, 923–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pardal, X.; Pochard, I.; Nonat, A. Experimental study of Si–Al substitution in calcium-silicate-hydrate (CSH) prepared under equilibrium conditions. Cem. Concr. Res. 2009, 39, 637–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Singh, L.; Bhattacharyya, S.; Mishra, G.; Ahalawat, S. Reduction of calcium leaching in cement hydration process using nanomaterials. Mater. Technol. 2012, 27, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lin, T.T.; Lin, C.F.; Wei, W.C.J. Mechanisms of metal stabilization in cementitious matrix: Interaction of dicalcium silicate (C2S) paste and copper oxide. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 1994, 43, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Myers, R.J.; Geng, G.; Rodriguez, E.D.; da Rosa, P.; Kirchheim, A.P.; Monteiro, P.J. Solution chemistry of cubic and orthorhombic tricalcium aluminate hydration. Cem. Concr. Res. 2017, 100, 176–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. De Jong, J.; Stein, H.; Stevels, J. Influence of amorphous silica on the hydration of tricalcium aluminate. J. Appl. Chem. 1969, 19, 25–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hou, P.; Wang, X.; Cheng, X. Effects of nanosilica on C3A hydration. In Proceedings of the 73rd RILEM Annual Week & the International Conference on Innovative Materials for Sustainable Civil Engineering, Nanjing, China, 25–30 August 2019; p. 119. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hou, P.; Wang, X.; Zhao, P.; Wang, K.; Kawashima, S.; Li, Q.; Xie, N.; Cheng, X.; Shah, S.P. Physicochemical effects of nanosilica on C3A/C3S hydration. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2020, 103, 6505–6518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Barr, T. ESCA studies of the coordination state of aluminium in oxide environments. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1997, 93, 181–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dubina, E.; Plank, J.; Black, L. Impact of water vapour and carbon dioxide on surface composition of C3A polymorphs studied by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Cem. Concr. Res. 2015, 73, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dubina, E.; Black, L.; Sieber, R.; Plank, J. Interaction of water vapour with anhydrous cement minerals. Adv. Appl. Ceram. 2010, 109, 260–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, J.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, W.; Wang, D.; Qi, T. Hydrous alumina/silica double-layer surface coating of TiO2 pigment. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2012, 407, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Barr, T.; Hoppe, E.; Hardcastle, S.; Seal, S. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy investigations of the chemistries of soils. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A Vac. Surf. Film. 1999, 17, 1079–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Seyama, H.; Soma, M. Bonding-state characterization of the constitutent elements of silicate minerals by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1 Phys. Chem. Condens. Phases 1985, 81, 485–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pardal, X.; Brunet, F.; Charpentier, T.; Pochard, I.; Nonat, A. 27Al and 29Si solid-state NMR characterization of calcium-aluminosilicate-hydrate. Inorg. Chem. 2012, 51, 1827–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Woessner, D.E. Characterization of clay minerals by 27Al nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Am. Mineral. 1989, 74, 203–215. [Google Scholar]
  37. Slade, R.; Southern, J.; Thompson, I. 27Al Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy investigation of thermal transformation sequences of alumina hydrate. PT. 1. GIBBSITE, GAMMA-Al (OH)3. J. Mater. Chem. 1991, 1, 563–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Monasterio, M.; Gaitero, J.J.; Erkizia, E.; Bustos, A.M.G.; Miccio, L.A.; Dolado, J.S.; Cerveny, S. Effect of addition of silica-and amine functionalized silica-nanoparticles on the microstructure of calcium silicate hydrate (C–S–H) gel. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2015, 450, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Yang, H.; Monasterio, M.; Cui, H.; Han, N. Experimental study of the effects of graphene oxide on microstructure and properties of cement paste composite. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2017, 102, 263–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Klur, I.; Pollet, B.; Virlet, J.; Nonat, A. CSH structure evolution with calcium content by multinuclear NMR. In Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy of Cement-Based Materials; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1998; pp. 119–141. [Google Scholar]
  41. Richardson, I.G. The calcium silicate hydrates. Cem. Concr. Res. 2008, 38, 137–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Richardson, I.; Brough, A.; Groves, G.; Dobson, C. The characterization of hardened alkali-activated blast-furnace slag pastes and the nature of the calcium silicate hydrate (CSH) phase. Cem. Concr. Res. 1994, 24, 813–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Schilling, P.J.; Butler, L.G.; Roy, A.; Eaton, H.C. 29Si and 27Al MAS-NMR of NaOH-activated blast-furnace slag. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1994, 77, 2363–2368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Škvára, F.; Jílek, T.; Kopecký, L. Geopolymer materials based on fly ash. Ceram. Silik. 2005, 49, 195–204. [Google Scholar]
  45. Justnes, H.; Meland, I.; Bjoergum, J.; Krane, J.; Skjetne, T. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)—A powerful tool in cement and concrete research. Adv. Cem. Res. 1990, 3, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gaitero, J.J.; Campillo, I.; Guerrero, A. Reduction of the calcium leaching rate of cement paste by addition of silica nanoparticles. Cem. Concr. Res. 2008, 38, 1112–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Mineral composition and particle characteristics of pure C3A and nano-SiO2 measured by (a) XRD diffraction pattern of pure C3A; (b) SEM photograph of C3A; (c) XRD diffraction pattern of nano-SiO2; (d) TEM photograph of nano-SiO2.
Figure 1. Mineral composition and particle characteristics of pure C3A and nano-SiO2 measured by (a) XRD diffraction pattern of pure C3A; (b) SEM photograph of C3A; (c) XRD diffraction pattern of nano-SiO2; (d) TEM photograph of nano-SiO2.
Nanomaterials 11 00199 g001
Figure 2. XRD analysis of all the samples to observe the evolution of peaks related to the hydration of the samples.
Figure 2. XRD analysis of all the samples to observe the evolution of peaks related to the hydration of the samples.
Nanomaterials 11 00199 g002
Figure 3. Heat flow rate of C3A samples with different nano-SiO2 contents in (a) 12 h (the blue area is enlarged and displayed as (b)) and (b) 3000 s (50 min). The number in (b) is the time needed to reach the maximum heat flow rate, in seconds.
Figure 3. Heat flow rate of C3A samples with different nano-SiO2 contents in (a) 12 h (the blue area is enlarged and displayed as (b)) and (b) 3000 s (50 min). The number in (b) is the time needed to reach the maximum heat flow rate, in seconds.
Nanomaterials 11 00199 g003
Figure 4. XPS results of (a) Al 2p and (b) Si 2p for hydration products of pure C3A and C3A with different nano SiO2 contents.
Figure 4. XPS results of (a) Al 2p and (b) Si 2p for hydration products of pure C3A and C3A with different nano SiO2 contents.
Nanomaterials 11 00199 g004
Figure 5. MAS-NMR signal obtained for (a) 27Al and (b) 29Si. 29Si measurement shows a large number of peaks; meanwhile, 27Al shows one peak uniquely.
Figure 5. MAS-NMR signal obtained for (a) 27Al and (b) 29Si. 29Si measurement shows a large number of peaks; meanwhile, 27Al shows one peak uniquely.
Nanomaterials 11 00199 g005
Figure 6. Silicon chain structure in C-S-H gel.
Figure 6. Silicon chain structure in C-S-H gel.
Nanomaterials 11 00199 g006
Figure 7. Percentages of different Qn peaks, calculated by Gaussian deconvolution from the 29Si MAS-NMR measurements.
Figure 7. Percentages of different Qn peaks, calculated by Gaussian deconvolution from the 29Si MAS-NMR measurements.
Nanomaterials 11 00199 g007
Table 1. Proportion of different components used during the preparation of the samples.
Table 1. Proportion of different components used during the preparation of the samples.
Sample NameC3A (g)Nano-SiO2 (g)Water (g)L/S
Pure C3A105050
C3A-2 wt.% nano SiO210.025150
C3A-4 wt.% nano SiO210.045250
C3A-6 wt.% nano SiO210.065350
C3A-8 wt.% nano SiO210.085450
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zheng, D.; Monasterio, M.; Feng, W.; Tang, W.; Cui, H.; Dong, Z. Hydration Characteristics of Tricalcium Aluminate in the Presence of Nano-Silica. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 199. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11010199

AMA Style

Zheng D, Monasterio M, Feng W, Tang W, Cui H, Dong Z. Hydration Characteristics of Tricalcium Aluminate in the Presence of Nano-Silica. Nanomaterials. 2021; 11(1):199. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11010199

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zheng, Dapeng, Manuel Monasterio, Weipeng Feng, Waiching Tang, Hongzhi Cui, and Zhijun Dong. 2021. "Hydration Characteristics of Tricalcium Aluminate in the Presence of Nano-Silica" Nanomaterials 11, no. 1: 199. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11010199

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop