Next Article in Journal
Combined AOPs for Formaldehyde Degradation Using Heterogeneous Nanostructured Catalysts
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of the Laser-Induced Oxide Layer in the Formation of Laser-Induced Periodic Surface Structures
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bimodal Nd-Doped LuVO4 Nanoprobes Functionalized with Polyacrilic Acid for X-Ray Computed Tomography and NIR Luminescent Imaging

1
Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Sevilla, CSIC-US, Américo Vespucio 49, Isla de la Cartuja, 41092 Sevilla, Spain
2
Departamento de Física de Materiales, C-04, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain
3
Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Aragón, CSIC/UniZar and CIBER-BBN, Edificio I+D, Mariano Esquillor s/n, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain
4
Centro Nacional de Aceleradores (CNA) (Universidad de Sevilla, Junta de Andalucía, CSIC), c/Thomas Alva Edison 7, Isla de la Cartuja, 41092 Sevilla, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2020, 10(1), 149; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10010149
Submission received: 12 November 2019 / Revised: 7 January 2020 / Accepted: 7 January 2020 / Published: 14 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Synthesis, Interfaces and Nanostructures)

Abstract

:
Uniform Nd3+-doped LuVO4 nanophosphors have been synthesized for the first time in literature by using a poliol-based method at 120 °C from Nd3+ and vanadate precursors. After optimizing the Nd doping level, these phosphors present intense luminescence in the near-infrared biological windows. The X-ray attenuation capacity of the optimum nanophosphor has been found to be higher than that of a commercial X-ray computed tomography contrast agent. After surface coating with polyacrylic acid, such nanoparticles present high colloidal stability in physiological pH medium and high cell viability. Because of these properties, the developed Nd3+-doped LuVO4 nanoparticles have potential applications as a bimodal probe for NIR luminescent bioimaging and X-ray computed tomography.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Among the most interesting techniques for medical diagnosis are luminescent imaging (LI), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and X-ray computed tomography (CT) [1]. In both cases, the use of external probes as contrast agents is usually required. Several compounds have been assayed for such a purpose, among which rare earth vanadate (REVO4)-based nanophosphors composed by a REVO4 matrix in which different luminescent lanthanide (Ln) cations are introduced as dopants, have been recently the focus of much attention. In particular, Ln-doped REVO4 (RE = Y, La, Gd; Ln = Eu, Tb, Dy, Sm, Nd, Yb), have been proposed as excellent probes for luminescent “in vitro” bioimaging and biosensing [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10], owing to their intense luminescence on excitation by UV light through an energy transfer process from the vanadate matrix to the Ln3+ cations [11]. However, the need for UV excitation is a drawback for in vivo bioapplications because of the potential damage that such radiation may cause to living organisms. It has been shown that for such applications, the use of doping Ln3+ cations whose luminescent properties are located within the biological windows in the near-infrared (NIR) region would be more appropriate, as it is the case of Nd3+ [12].
REVO4-based multifunctional probes useful for more than one imaging technique have been also reported. For example, Ln-doped GdVO4 (Ln = Eu, Dy) nanoparticles have been shown to be promising candidates as both luminescent and MRI probes due to the magnetic properties of the Gd3+ cations [2,3,4,5]. In addition, because the atomic number of Ln is high, the X-ray attenuation capability of these elements is also high [13], and consequently, Ln-based nanoparticles can be also used as contrast agents for CT. For that reason, Lu3+-based compounds are the most advantageous probes for this application. However, in the case of LnVO4 compounds, this additional functionality has been only studied for the of case Ln-doped Y(Gd)VO4 (Ln = Eu, Dy, Sm) nanoparticles [14]. It should be also noticed that no reports on the development of luminescent Nd:LuVO4-based bioprobes could be found in the literature either. The lack of antecedents regarding to the potential use of this material for bioimaging purposes might be due to the scarce availability of synthesis methods yielding Ln-doped LuVO4 particles with appropriated characteristics for such uses, namely, uniformity in size and shape, particle size lower than 100 nm, low cytotoxicity, and high colloidal stability in physiological media [15,16].
In this paper, we report on a procedure for the synthesis, for the first time in the literature, of uniform Nd3+-doped LuVO4 nanophosphors with nearly equiaxial shape by homogeneous precipitation at 120 °C from ethylene glycol (EG)/water solutions containing Ln3+ nitrates and sodium orthovanadate. The effects of the amount of Nd3+ incorporated into the LuVO4 matrix on the luminescence of the obtained nanoparticles have been studied aiming to establish the optimum Nd3+ content. The X-ray attenuation capacity of the optimized phosphor has been also evaluated in comparison with that of Iohexol, one of the CT contrast agents most used in clinics. To achieve the colloidal stability criteria in physiological pH conditions, the optimum sample has been surface coated with polyacrylic acid (PAA) molecules and the cell viability of such functionalized samples has been also analyzed. This study demonstrates that the developed Nd3+:LuVO4 nanophosphors are promising candidates for their use as a bimodal probe for in vivo luminescent bioimaging and X-ray computed tomography.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Lutetium (III) nitrate hydrate (Lu(NO3)3·xH2O, Sigma-Aldrich, 99.9%, St. Louis, MO, USA), neodymium (III) nitrate hexahydrate (Nd(NO3)3·6H2O, Sigma-Aldrich, 99.9%, St. Louis, MO, USA), sodium orthovanadate (Na3VO4, Sigma-Aldrich, 99.9%, St. Louis, MO, USA), ethylene glycol (EG, Sigma-Aldrich, 99.9%, St. Louis, MO, USA), polyacrylic acid (PAA, average Mw~1800, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 2-morpholinoethanesulfonic acid (MES, Sigma-Aldrich, 99%, St. Louis, MO, USA), and Iohexol (Sigma-Aldrich, analytical standard, ≥95%, St. Louis, MO, USA) were used as received.

2.2. Synthesis of LuVO4 Nanoparticles

Nd-doped LuVO4 nanoparticles having different Nd contents (Nd/(Nd + Lu) mol ratio = 0, 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0) were synthesized by homogeneous precipitation according to a procedure previously developed by us for the preparation of GdVO4 nanoparticles [2], which was adapted by introducing the needed modifications in order to produce nanoparticles of the desired compound with narrow size distribution. Specifically, for a given doping level, the required amounts of the lanthanide precursors (Lu(NO3)3 and Nd(NO3)3, total Ln concentration = 0.04 moldm−3), and Na3VO4 (0.04 mol dm−3) were separately dissolved in Milli-Q water (0.75 cm3) under magnetic stirring. EG (1.75 cm3) was then added to each of these solutions. After homogenization, they were mixed under vigorous stirring. The resulting mixture (total volume = 5 cm3) introduced in a test tube, which was tightly closed, was aged for 20 h in an oven at constant temperature (120 °C). The obtained dispersions were allowed to cool to room temperature. The precipitates were purified by centrifugation and redispersion, twice in ethanol and once in distilled water. The as-prepared particles were stored dispersed in Milli-Q water and dried at room temperature when required.

2.3. PAA Functionalization of LuVO4 Nanoparticles

PAA (2 mg cm−3) was dissolved in Milli-Q water containing 0.5 mg cm−3 of Nd:LuVO4 nanoparticles. After adjusting the pH of this dispersion to 10 by adding a few droplets of a NaOH solution, it was maintained for 1 h at −25 °C under magnetic stirring. Afterward, the supernatants were removed by centrifugation and the surface-modified nanoparticles were washed several times with Milli-Q water and finally dispersed in Milli-Q water.

2.4. Characterization

Transmission electron micrographs (TEM) were taken in a Philips 200CM microscope (ThermoFisher Scientific, Hillsboro, OR, USA). Particle size distributions were estimated from the TEM pictures by counting hundreds of particles.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded in a Panalytical X′Pert Pro diffractometer (Malvern Panalytical, Cambridge, UK) equipped with an X-Celerator detector. Unit cell constants were calculated by Rietveld refinement of the XRD patterns (registered with a 0.02° 2θ step and an accumulation time of 1000 s) using the X′Pert High Score Plus software.
The infrared spectra (FTIR) of the samples diluted in KBr were measured in a JASCO FT/IR-6200 apparatus (Jasco Europe SRL, Cremella, Italy).
Thermogravimetric analyses (TGA) were conducted in air atmosphere employing a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 in a Q600 TA instrument (TA instrument, New Castle, DE, USA).
Excitation and emission spectra of the samples in powdered form were obtained using a tunable Ti:Sapphire laser as excitation source. To obtain comparative data, we employed the same amount of sample, which was placed in a hole (3 mm diameter) practiced in an aluminum foil, which was sandwiched between two microscope slides. Lifetime measurements were carried out by exciting the samples at 532 nm with the second harmonic of a pulsed Nd:YAG laser (pulse width, 10 ns and repetition rate, 10 Hz) and recording the luminescence decay at λexc = 1344 nm (4F3/24I13/2 transition) using a Tektronix DPO4104B-L digital oscilloscope.
CT measurements were acquired with a NanoSPECT/CT® apparatus (Mediso, Budapest, Hungary). For such a purpose, different amounts of the sample were dispersed in Milli-Q and the dispersion was homogenized in a vortex device for 2 min before measurements. Afterward, 200 μL of each dispersion was introduced in a multiwell microplate, along with a Milli-Q water aliquot used for calibration. The acquisition parameters were: 106 mA current for a voltage of 65 kV, exposure time per projection of 1500 ms, 360 projections per rotation, and total acquisition time of 18 min. The image length was 6 cm, with a pitch of 1. The image was reconstructed with Vivoquant image processing software (Invicro, London, UK), with the exact cone-beam filtered back-projection algorithm and the Shepp Logan 98% filter. The resulting image pixel size was uniform in three dimensions at 0.2 mm. Images were analyzed with PMOD 3.8 software (PMOD Technologies LLC, Zürich, Switzerland). Spherical volumes of interest (VOIs) of a 2 mm radius were made within each sample to calculate the X-ray attenuation (in Hounsfield Units, HU) for each concentration. Average values of Milli-Q water and dispersions were used to calculate HU values in the images, with attenuation being 0 HU for water and −1000 HU for air.
The colloidal stability of the dispersions containing the nanophosphors (0.1 mg cm−3) in 50 mM MES solution at pH = 6.5 was evaluated by measuring the hydrodynamic diameter (dh) by dynamic light scattering (DLS) using a Zetasizer NanoZS90, Malvern instrument.
To analyze cytotoxicity, the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) colorimetric assay [17] and Vero cells (kidney epithelial cells from African green monkey) were used. The cells, purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC: CCL-81), were cultured in a 5% CO2 atmosphere in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2 mM glutamine, and 100 U cm−3 penicillin/streptomycin at 37 °C.
For the MTT analysis, 5000 cells were first seeded in each well of 96-well plates and grown for 24 h. Then, the medium was substituted with fresh medium containing variable amounts of nanoparticles. After further cultivation for 24 h, 20 µL of MTT dye solution (5 mg cm−3 in PBS) was added to each well. After 3 h of incubation at 37 °C and 5% CO2, the medium was removed, the cells were washed with fresh medium, the plate was centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 30 min, the supernatant was discarded, and formazan crystals were dissolved in 100 µL of DMSO. The absorbance of each well was read on a microplate reader (Multiskan GO, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at 570 nm. The relative cell viability (%) related to control wells containing cells without nanoparticles was calculated as [A]test/[A]control × 100.

3. Results

3.1. Samples Preparation and Characterization

The aging at 120 °C for 20 h of Ln nitrate (Lu(NO3)3 + Nd(NO3)3 = 0.04 mol dm−3 and Nd/(Nd + Lu) mol ratio from 0.2% to 2%) and sodium orthovanadate (0.04 mol dm−3) solutions in EG/water (3.5/1.5 by volume) yielded almost equiaxed nanoparticles as those illustrated in Figure 1, in which the undoped sample and that with the highest doping level are shown.
The particle size, as measured from the TEM micrographs, was found to be ~70 nm for all samples, irrespective of the doping level (Table 1).
According to XRD, the obtained nanoparticles consisted of tetragonal LuVO4 (PDF 1-72-270, ICDD 2016), irrespective of the Nd content (Figure 2). The successful incorporation of Nd3+ into the LuVO4 lattice was assessed by the evaluation of the unit cell constants of the samples. As observed in Table 1, the increase of the Nd content gave rise to a progressive unit cell expansion, which manifests that the Lu3+ cations have been substituted by Nd3+ in the LuVO4 structure since the ionic radius in of Nd3+ (1.109 Å) is greater than that of Lu3+ (0.977 Å), both in eight-fold coordination [18].

3.2. NIR Luminescence

The number, position, and relative intensity of the excitation bands registered for the emission appearing at 1066 nm for the Nd:LuVO4 nanoparticles were similar, irrespective of the Nd content. As an illustrative example, the spectrum of the sample doped with a 0.2% molar of Nd3+ is shown in Figure 3. As expected, this spectrum shows three groups of bands in the 730–790 nm, 790–850 nm, and 870–930 nm regions, associated to the 4I9/24S3/2:4F7/2, 4I9/22H9/2:4F5/2, and 4I9/24F3/2 f-f electronic transitions of the Nd3+ ions, respectively [7].
The emission spectra of the LuVO4 nanoparticles containing different amounts of Nd3+ obtained upon excitation through the most intense excitation band (λex = 810 nm) are presented in Figure 4 (top). The emission bands characteristic of the 4F3/24IJ (J = 9/2, 11/2 and 13/2) electronic transitions of Nd3+ were detected in all cases [7], whose intensity varies with the doping level. Thus, when plotting the integrated area of the emissions vs. the Nd content (Figure 4 (down)), it was clearly observed that the rise of the Nd3+ doping level up to 1.5% produced a progressive increase of the emission intensity, which must be attributed the increase of the number of emission centers. However, above such doping levels (2%), the emission intensity decreased, suggesting the presence of concentration quenching. This known effect was further confirmed by determining the luminescence lifetime of the samples.
The decay curves corresponding to the 4F3/24I13/2 Nd3+ transition (1344 nm) of the Nd:LuVO4 samples are presented in Figure 5 in a semi-logarithmic plot. As it can be observed, after an initial rise, the luminescence temporal evolution decays following a single exponential dependence:
I(t) = I0 exp(−t/τ)
where I(t) is the luminescence intensity, I0 is the initial intensity, t is the time after excitation, and τ is the decay time. Dashed lines in Figure 5 correspond to least squares fitting.
The corresponding decay time values obtained from this fitting are also included in Figure 5, and their evolution with Nd3+ concentration is plotted in Figure 6. As observed, the decay time decreases monotonously with Nd3+ content, indicating the occurrence of concentration quenching processes, which become more evident at doping levels ≥1% Nd. This implies a reduction in the luminescence efficiency that counterbalances the rise in the number of emitting centers as concentration increases. According to the results obtained under CW excitation (Figure 5), the best compromise seems to happen for the sample having a 1.5% Nd, which can be considered, from a practical point of view, as the optimum nanophosphor for bioimaging owing to its highest emission intensity.

3.3. X-Ray Attenuation

The X-ray attenuation properties of the optimum nanophosphor (Nd (1.5%):LuVO4) and those of Iohexol, which is one of the most commonly used CT contrast agents in clinics, were measured in aqueous suspensions.
The obtained X-ray attenuation phantom images are shown in Figure 7 (top), where it can be clearly observed that the contrast produced by increasing the nanophosphor’s concentration in the suspensions is higher than that corresponding to Iohexol, suggesting better performance of our nanoparticles as a CT contrast agent. This finding was further corroborated by the X-ray attenuation values, in Hounsfield units (HU), which were estimated from the phantom images, and plotted in Figure 7 (bottom) as a function of the nanophosphor’s concentration. This figure reveals an increase of the HU values by increasing the concentration of the suspensions following a straight line whose slope is higher for our system (27.3 HU/mg cm−3) than for Iohexol (15.3 HU/mg cm−3). This behavior is not surprising given the expected increase of the X-ray attenuation coefficient when the average atomic number of the elements constituting the probe increases [13]. The excellent X-ray attenuation properties of our nanophosphors indicate that they can be used not only as a probe for NIR imaging but also as a CT contrast agent.

3.4. Colloidal Stability and PAA Surface Modification

The colloidal stability of our optimum bifunctional probe (Nd (1.5%):LuVO4) was evaluated through DLS measurements conducted in freshly prepared suspensions containing our nanoparticles in MES buffer at physiological pH (MES 50 mM at pH = 6.5).
It was found that the hydrodynamic diameter (dh) obtained from the DLS curve (Figure 8) was much higher (1280 nm) than the mean particle size resulting from the analysis of the TEM pictures (77 nm) indicating that this sample does not meet the stability criterion established for the use for in vivo applications. To overcome this limitation, a surface modification approach, consisting of a coating process of the nanoparticles with PAA polymer, was undertaken. After such a process, a surface charge reversal was detected. Thus, the zeta potential value changed from +25 mV to −45 mV after functionalization, which suggests the presence of PAA molecules with ionized carboxylate groups on the particle surface. These species could be identified in the FTIR spectra of the functionalized sample. Thus, the spectrum of the pristine sample (Figure 9, top) only displayed the absorption features associated with the vanadate vibrational modes (<1000 cm−1) [7], adsorbed water (3400 and 1625 cm−1), and a very weak band at 1370 cm−1 probably due to residual EG molecules [19]. However, additional weaker features in the 1600–1400 cm−1 region were detected in the spectrum of the functionalized nanoparticles, which can be attributed to the asymmetric (1545 cm−1) and symmetric (1400 cm−1) stretching vibrations of the carboxylate groups of the PAA molecules [7]. These results confirm that our functionalization procedure was successful.
The amount of PAA polymer deposited on the nanoparticle surface could be quantified according to the TGA curves presented in Figure 9 (bottom). As observed, in the curve corresponding to the original sample a first weight loss (~4%) was detected in the 25–300 °C range due to the removal of adsorbed water. The smaller loss (1.5%) that occurred at higher temperatures (300–700 °C) might be a consequence of the decomposition of the residual EG molecules. The functionalized sample presented an additional weight loss (2%) between 300 and 500 °C, which must be due to the decomposition of PAA entities.
The PAA coating gave rise to an improvement in the colloidal stability of the nanophosphor. Thus, the value of dh obtained in MES media after functionalization (Figure 8) was closer (90 nm) to the mean particle size (77 nm), clearly indicating the absence of significant aggregation, as required for the intended biomedical application of the developed probe.

3.5. Biocompatibility

Cell viability analyses were performed for the optimum nanophosphor using the MTT assay [17] with Vero cells. The metabolic activity of the cells measured for different nanoparticles concentrations after 24 h culture is shown in Figure 10, in which it can be observed that cell survival remained above 65% for nanoparticle contents in the suspensions up to 0.3 mg cm−3.

4. Conclusions

The aging at 120 °C for 20 h of solutions containing precise amounts of Lu(NO3)3, Nd(NO3)3, (Lu(NO3)3 + Nd(NO3)3 = 0.04 mol dm−3 and variable Nd/(Nd + Lu mol ratio), and sodium orthovanadate (0.04 mol dm−3) in EG/H2O medium (3.5/1.5 ratio, by volume) yields Nd3+-doped LuVO4 nanoparticles with almost equiaxed shape and narrow size distribution (~70 nm). These particles crystallize into the tetragonal phase and show polycrystalline character. Irrespective of the Nd content (from 0.2% to 2%), NIR emissions in the 850–1400 nm region were detected for all samples upon excitation at 811 nm. The most intense emissions corresponded to the particles doped with 1.5 mol% Nd3+, for which they were considered as the optimum nanophosphors for bioimaging. The X-ray attenuation properties of this nanophosphor were higher than that of Iohexol, a commercial X-ray computed tomography contrast agent. After surface coating with polyacrylic acid molecules, this probe showed high colloidal stability in aqueous suspensions at physiological pH and low cytotoxicity. Because of these properties, the Nd-doped LuVO4 nanoparticles functionalized with polyacrylic acid can be considered as promising candidates for their use as bimodal probes for NIR luminescent bioimaging and X-ray computed tomography.

Author Contributions

N.O.N. synthesized and characterized the samples; F.C. and E.C. recorded and analyzed the luminescence data; B.M.-G. and J.M.d.l.F. analyzed cytotoxicity; A.C. and M.B. recorded and analyzed the X-ray attenuation measurements; M.O. conceptualized the study, supervised the work, and wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agree to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work has been supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (MCIU/AEI/FEDER) under grant RTI2018-094426-B-I00, and Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (MINECO) under project MAT2016-75716-C2-2-R.

Acknowledgments

Support by Siemens Healthcare S.L.U is acknowledged. Authors also acknowledge CNA for the use of the ICTS NanoCT facilities and support from DGA and Fondos Feder for funding Bionanosurf (E15_17R) research group B. Martin acknowledges DGA for a predoctoral grant.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Leary, J.F.; Key, J. Nanoparticles for multimodal in vivo imaging in nanomedicine. Int. J. Nanomed. 2014, 9, 711–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Nuñez, N.O.; Rivera, S.; Alcántara, D.; De La Fuente, J.M.; García-Sevillano, J.; Ocaña, M. Surface modified Eu:GdVO4 nanocrystals for optical and MRI imaging. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 10725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Dong, K.; Ju, E.; Liu, J.; Han, X.; Ren, J.; Qu, X. Ultrasmall biomolecule-anchored hybrid GdVO4 nanophosphors as a metabolizable multimodal bioimaging contrast agent. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 12042–12049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Abdesselem, M.; Schoeffel, M.; Maurin, I.; Ramodiharilafy, R.; Autret, G.; Clément, O.; Tharaux, P.-L.; Boilot, J.-P.; Gacoin, T.; Bouzigues, C.; et al. Multifunctional Rare-Earth Vanadate Nanoparticles: Luminescent Labels, Oxidant Sensors, and MRI Contrast Agents. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 11126–11137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Liu, Y.X.; Liu, G.X.; Dong, X.T.; Wang, J.X.; Yu, W.S. Tunable photoluminescence and magnetic properties of Dy3+ and Eu3+ doped GdVO4 multifunctional phosphors. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 26638–26644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Liu, Y.; Liu, G.; Wang, J.; Dong, X.T.; Yu, W.S. Reddish-orange-emitting and paramagnetic properties of GdVO4:Sm3+/Eu3+ multifunctional nanomaterials. New J. Chem. 2015, 39, 8282–8290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Núñez, N.O.; Zambrano, P.; García-Sevillano, J.; Cantelar, E.; Rivera-Fernández, S.; De La Fuente, J.M.; Ocaña, M. Uniform Poly(acrylic acid)-Functionalized Lanthanide-Doped LaVO4 Nanophosphors with High Colloidal Stability and Biocompatibility. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 2015, 4546–4554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jeyaraman, J.; Shukla, A.; Sivakumar, S. Targeted Stealth Polymer Capsules Encapsulating Ln(3+)-Doped LaVO4 Nanoparticles for Bioimaging Applications. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 2, 1330–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kolesnikov, I.E.; Kalinichev, A.A.; Kurochkin, M.A.; Golyeva, E.V.; Kolesnikov, E.Y.; Kurochkin, A.V.; Lahderanta, E.; Mikhailov, M.D. YVO4:Nd3+ nanophosphors as NIR-to-NIR thermal sensors in wide temperature range. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 18002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Spyrogianni, A.; Tiefenboeck, P.; Starsich, F.H.; Keevend, K.; Krumeich, F.; Herrmann, I.K.; Leroux, J.C.; Sotiriou, G.A. Near-UV Activated, Photostable Nanophosphors for In Vitro Dosimetry and Dynamic Bioimaging. AICHE J. 2018, 64, 2947–2957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gupta, B.K.; Rathee, V.; Narayan, T.N.; Thanikaivelan, P.; Saha, A.; Singh, S.P.; Shanker, V.; Narti, A.A.; Alayan, P.M. Probing a Bifunctional Luminomagnetic Nanophosphor for Biological Applications: A Photoluminescence and Time-Resolved Spectroscopic Study. Small 2011, 7, 1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wang, R.; Zhang, F. NIR luminescent nanomaterials for biomedical imaging. J. Mater. Chem. B 2014, 2, 2422–2443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lusic, H.; Grinstaff, M.W. X-ray-Computed Tomography Contrast Agents. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 1641–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Chen, C.; Li, C.; Li, T.; Liu, J.; Huang, H.; Bai, T.; Wang, Z.; Shi, Z.; Feng, S. Water-Soluble, Monodisperse, Lanthanide-Doped Y(Gd)VO4 Nanocrystals as Promising Multimodal Bioprobe. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 2015, 3108–3115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gnach, A.; Bednarkiewicz, A. Lanthanide-doped up-converting nanoparticles: Merits and challenges. Nano Today 2012, 7, 532–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Duan, X.; Li, Y. Physicochemical characteristics of nanoparticles affect circulation, biodistribution, cellular internalization, and trafficking. Small 2013, 9, 1521–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mosmann, T.J. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: Application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J. Immunol. Methods 1993, 65, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shannon, R.D. Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Cryst. A 1976, 32, 751–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Matsuura, H.; Miyazawa, T. Infrared spectra and molecular vibrations of ethylene glycol and deuterated derivatives. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1967, 40, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. TEM images of the particles synthesized by precipitating solutions in EG/H2O (3.5/1.5) containing: (top) Na3VO4 (0.04 mol dm−3) and Lu(NO3)3 = 0.04 mol dm−3; (down) under the same conditions but in the presence of 2% Nd (Nd/(Nd + Lu) mol ratio). In both cases, the aging temperature was set at 120 °C and aging time was 20 h.
Figure 1. TEM images of the particles synthesized by precipitating solutions in EG/H2O (3.5/1.5) containing: (top) Na3VO4 (0.04 mol dm−3) and Lu(NO3)3 = 0.04 mol dm−3; (down) under the same conditions but in the presence of 2% Nd (Nd/(Nd + Lu) mol ratio). In both cases, the aging temperature was set at 120 °C and aging time was 20 h.
Nanomaterials 10 00149 g001
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction patterns for the nanoparticles obtained in the absence (undoped) and the presence of different amounts of Nd3+, and PDF of tetragonal LuVO4.
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction patterns for the nanoparticles obtained in the absence (undoped) and the presence of different amounts of Nd3+, and PDF of tetragonal LuVO4.
Nanomaterials 10 00149 g002
Figure 3. Excitation spectra of the Nd (0.2%):LuVO4 nanoparticles.
Figure 3. Excitation spectra of the Nd (0.2%):LuVO4 nanoparticles.
Nanomaterials 10 00149 g003
Figure 4. (Top) Emission spectra of the Nd:LuVO4 nanoparticles with different Nd3+ content. (Down) Integrated intensity of the emissions vs. the Nd3+ doping level. Line is a guide for the eye. Error bars have been included.
Figure 4. (Top) Emission spectra of the Nd:LuVO4 nanoparticles with different Nd3+ content. (Down) Integrated intensity of the emissions vs. the Nd3+ doping level. Line is a guide for the eye. Error bars have been included.
Nanomaterials 10 00149 g004
Figure 5. Temporal decays for the 4F3/2 → 4I13/2 transition (1344 nm) of the Nd:LuVO4 nanoparticles with different Nd3+ content in a semi-logarithmic plot. The decay time values correspond to the least squares fitting to Equation (1).
Figure 5. Temporal decays for the 4F3/2 → 4I13/2 transition (1344 nm) of the Nd:LuVO4 nanoparticles with different Nd3+ content in a semi-logarithmic plot. The decay time values correspond to the least squares fitting to Equation (1).
Nanomaterials 10 00149 g005
Figure 6. Concentration dependence of the experimental decay times. Dashed line represents the least squares fitting to Equation (1). Error bars have been included.
Figure 6. Concentration dependence of the experimental decay times. Dashed line represents the least squares fitting to Equation (1). Error bars have been included.
Nanomaterials 10 00149 g006
Figure 7. X-ray attenuation phantom images (top) and Hounsfield units (HU) values (bottom) obtained for the Nd (1.5%):LuVO4 nanoparticles and for Iohexol at different concentrations in water.
Figure 7. X-ray attenuation phantom images (top) and Hounsfield units (HU) values (bottom) obtained for the Nd (1.5%):LuVO4 nanoparticles and for Iohexol at different concentrations in water.
Nanomaterials 10 00149 g007
Figure 8. DLS curves obtained for the Nd (1.5%):LuVO4 nanoparticles before and after surface functionalization with polyacrylic acid (PAA) and dispersed in 50 mM MES solution at pH = 6.5. The hydrodynamic diameter (dh) is also included.
Figure 8. DLS curves obtained for the Nd (1.5%):LuVO4 nanoparticles before and after surface functionalization with polyacrylic acid (PAA) and dispersed in 50 mM MES solution at pH = 6.5. The hydrodynamic diameter (dh) is also included.
Nanomaterials 10 00149 g008
Figure 9. FTIR spectra (top) and TGA curves (bottom) obtained for the Nd (1.5%):LuVO4 nanoparticles before and after surface functionalization with PAA.
Figure 9. FTIR spectra (top) and TGA curves (bottom) obtained for the Nd (1.5%):LuVO4 nanoparticles before and after surface functionalization with PAA.
Nanomaterials 10 00149 g009
Figure 10. Cell viability of the Nd (1.5%):LuVO4 nanoparticles functionalized with PAA.
Figure 10. Cell viability of the Nd (1.5%):LuVO4 nanoparticles functionalized with PAA.
Nanomaterials 10 00149 g010
Table 1. Mean size, unit cell parameters, cell volume, and crystallite size of the particles obtained by aging at 120 °C for 20 h. EG/H2O solutions containing Lu(NO3)3, Nd(NO3)3, (Nd(NO3)3 + Lu(NO3)3 = 0.04 mol dm−3, and variable Nd/(Nd + Lu mol ratio) and sodium orthovanadate (0.04 mol dm−3) in EG/H2O medium (ratio by volume = 3.5/1.5). Standard deviations for particle size and unit cell parameters errors are included in parentheses.
Table 1. Mean size, unit cell parameters, cell volume, and crystallite size of the particles obtained by aging at 120 °C for 20 h. EG/H2O solutions containing Lu(NO3)3, Nd(NO3)3, (Nd(NO3)3 + Lu(NO3)3 = 0.04 mol dm−3, and variable Nd/(Nd + Lu mol ratio) and sodium orthovanadate (0.04 mol dm−3) in EG/H2O medium (ratio by volume = 3.5/1.5). Standard deviations for particle size and unit cell parameters errors are included in parentheses.
Nd/(Nd + Lu) Mean Sizea = bcCell Volume
(% Nominal)(nm)(Å)(Å)3)
060 (14)7.0330(9)6.2180(1)307.58
0.273 (11)7.0305(7)6.2274(7)307.80
0.570 (12)7.0332(7)6.2280(7)308.07
1.075 (9)7.0341(6)6.2296(6)308.20
1.577 (13)7.0352(5)6.2294(5)308.31
2.075 (10)7.0367(6)6.2321(6)308.58

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nuñez, N.O.; Cussó, F.; Cantelar, E.; Martin-Gracia, B.; de la Fuente, J.M.; Corral, A.; Balcerzyk, M.; Ocaña, M. Bimodal Nd-Doped LuVO4 Nanoprobes Functionalized with Polyacrilic Acid for X-Ray Computed Tomography and NIR Luminescent Imaging. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10010149

AMA Style

Nuñez NO, Cussó F, Cantelar E, Martin-Gracia B, de la Fuente JM, Corral A, Balcerzyk M, Ocaña M. Bimodal Nd-Doped LuVO4 Nanoprobes Functionalized with Polyacrilic Acid for X-Ray Computed Tomography and NIR Luminescent Imaging. Nanomaterials. 2020; 10(1):149. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10010149

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nuñez, Nuria O, Fernando Cussó, Eugenio Cantelar, Beatriz Martin-Gracia, Jesús M de la Fuente, Ariadna Corral, Marcin Balcerzyk, and Manuel Ocaña. 2020. "Bimodal Nd-Doped LuVO4 Nanoprobes Functionalized with Polyacrilic Acid for X-Ray Computed Tomography and NIR Luminescent Imaging" Nanomaterials 10, no. 1: 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10010149

APA Style

Nuñez, N. O., Cussó, F., Cantelar, E., Martin-Gracia, B., de la Fuente, J. M., Corral, A., Balcerzyk, M., & Ocaña, M. (2020). Bimodal Nd-Doped LuVO4 Nanoprobes Functionalized with Polyacrilic Acid for X-Ray Computed Tomography and NIR Luminescent Imaging. Nanomaterials, 10(1), 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10010149

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop