Next Article in Journal
Rheological Behavior of a New Mucoadhesive Oral Formulation Based on Sodium Chondroitin Sulfate, Xyloglucan and Glycerol
Next Article in Special Issue
Functionalization with a Polyphenol-Rich Pomace Extract Empowers a Ceramic Bone Filler with In Vitro Antioxidant, Anti-Inflammatory, and Pro-Osteogenic Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Advances in Fabricating the Electrospun Biopolymer-Based Biomaterials
Previous Article in Special Issue
Characterization of Dental Pulp Stem Cell Responses to Functional Biomaterials Including Mineralized Trioxide Aggregates
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Study of Technologies for Tubule Occlusion and Treatment of Dentin Hypersensitivity

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Division of Applied Materials Science, Uppsala University, 751 21 Uppsala, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Funct. Biomater. 2021, 12(2), 27; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb12020027
Submission received: 10 February 2021 / Revised: 21 April 2021 / Accepted: 23 April 2021 / Published: 27 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Dental Implants and Biomaterials)

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the occluding/remineralization performance and resistance to acid attacks of the mineralization layer formed by a tooth-desensitizing gel containing amorphous calcium magnesium phosphate (ACMP) particles and compare it to six other desensitizing products available on the market. Similar comprehensive studies are few and there is especially a lack of studies that are up to date. A dentin-disc model was used for in vitro evaluation of the desensitizing toothpastes/gels. Application of the products was performed twice daily for seven days. One set of specimens were evaluated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) directly after the final treatment and another set was evaluated after an acid challenge, exposing specimens to 2 wt% citric acid. The ACMP desensitizing gel was the only product resulting in complete occlusion by the formation of mineralized material on the dentin surface and inside the tubules. Particle deposition was dominant after treatment with the other desensitizing products, with little or no mineralization, resulting in partial occlusion only. Sensodyne Repair & Protect and Oral-B Pro-Expert showed the highest resistance toward acid attacks. Material inside the tubules remained relatively unaffected by acid attacks in all specimens. The results in this study indicated a great variability among the occluding agents in terms of occlusion and acid resistance of the mineralization layer. The high degree of occlusion and intra-tubular mineralization that could mitigate the effect of acid solubilization indicate that the ACMP desensitizing gel may be a superior option for the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity.
Keywords: dentin hypersensitivity; occlusion; desensitizing agents; calcium phosphate; remineralization dentin hypersensitivity; occlusion; desensitizing agents; calcium phosphate; remineralization

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Berg, C.; Unosson, E.; Engqvist, H.; Xia, W. Comparative Study of Technologies for Tubule Occlusion and Treatment of Dentin Hypersensitivity. J. Funct. Biomater. 2021, 12, 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb12020027

AMA Style

Berg C, Unosson E, Engqvist H, Xia W. Comparative Study of Technologies for Tubule Occlusion and Treatment of Dentin Hypersensitivity. Journal of Functional Biomaterials. 2021; 12(2):27. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb12020027

Chicago/Turabian Style

Berg, Camilla, Erik Unosson, Håkan Engqvist, and Wei Xia. 2021. "Comparative Study of Technologies for Tubule Occlusion and Treatment of Dentin Hypersensitivity" Journal of Functional Biomaterials 12, no. 2: 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb12020027

APA Style

Berg, C., Unosson, E., Engqvist, H., & Xia, W. (2021). Comparative Study of Technologies for Tubule Occlusion and Treatment of Dentin Hypersensitivity. Journal of Functional Biomaterials, 12(2), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb12020027

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop