Next Article in Journal
Attentional Symptom Expression Moderates the Role of Vocabulary in Reading Comprehension Among Fifth-Grade Students
Previous Article in Journal
The Influence of AI on Critical Thinking and Creativity in L2 Learning Contexts: A Social Cognitive Perspective
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Applying GenAI to Optimize Q-Matrix Construction for Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment in EFL Reading

School of Foreign Studies, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Intell. 2026, 14(5), 79; https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence14050079
Submission received: 23 February 2026 / Revised: 22 April 2026 / Accepted: 23 April 2026 / Published: 5 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Contributions to the Measurement of Intelligence)

Abstract

Q-matrix construction is a foundational yet challenging step in cognitive diagnostic assessment (CDA), which is traditionally reliant on labor-intensive and subjective methods like expert judgment and verbal report analysis. This study explores the potential of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) to optimize this critical process within the domain of EFL reading. By applying three GenAI models (DeepSeek-V3.2, Kimi 2.5, and Doubao 2.0), three purely GenAI-informed Q-matrices (Qmat-DS, Qmat-K, and Qmat-DB) were generated, and through expert revision, a human–AI collaborative Q-matrix (Qmat-DS-H) was obtained. These were compared with an expert-constructed Q-matrix (Qmat-E) and a student-derived Q-matrix (Qmat-S). Using a simulated dataset (N = 1000) and empirical response data from 1083 EFL learners on a diagnostic reading test, the psychometric performance of the six Q-matrices was estimated via the G-DINA model, ACDM model, and RRUM model. Results demonstrated that the human–AI collaborative Q-matrix consistently outperformed the other five Q-matrices, achieving the best absolute model-data fit, the highest classification accuracy, the most stable item parameters, and the most balanced attribute correlation structure. The purely GenAI-informed Q-matrices showed mixed results: there were some improvements in relative fit and slip stability compared to manually constructed Q-matrices, but variable absolute fit and attribute correlation patterns. The findings substantiate GenAI as a feasible pathway for enhancing the efficiency, consistency, and psychometric quality of Q-matrix construction. This study offers a preliminary framework for advancing CDA development, addressing a key methodological bottleneck in language assessment.
Keywords: Q-matrix; generative artificial intelligence; cognitive diagnostic assessment; human–AI collaboration Q-matrix; generative artificial intelligence; cognitive diagnostic assessment; human–AI collaboration

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Du, W.; Shen, J.; Ma, X. Applying GenAI to Optimize Q-Matrix Construction for Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment in EFL Reading. J. Intell. 2026, 14, 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence14050079

AMA Style

Du W, Shen J, Ma X. Applying GenAI to Optimize Q-Matrix Construction for Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment in EFL Reading. Journal of Intelligence. 2026; 14(5):79. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence14050079

Chicago/Turabian Style

Du, Wenbo, Jiayi Shen, and Xiaomei Ma. 2026. "Applying GenAI to Optimize Q-Matrix Construction for Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment in EFL Reading" Journal of Intelligence 14, no. 5: 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence14050079

APA Style

Du, W., Shen, J., & Ma, X. (2026). Applying GenAI to Optimize Q-Matrix Construction for Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment in EFL Reading. Journal of Intelligence, 14(5), 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence14050079

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop