Next Article in Journal
A Conjecture on the Nature of Information, with a “Simple” Example
Previous Article in Journal
A Frequency-Based Assignment Model under Day-to-Day Information Evolution of Oversaturated Conditions on a Feeder Bus Service
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Learning to Recommend Point-of-Interest with the Weighted Bayesian Personalized Ranking Method in LBSNs

1
School of Management Science and Engineering, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China
2
Information Technology Bureau of Shandong Province, China Post Group, Jinan 250001, China
3
School of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Information 2017, 8(1), 20; https://doi.org/10.3390/info8010020
Submission received: 12 December 2016 / Revised: 23 January 2017 / Accepted: 26 January 2017 / Published: 6 February 2017

Abstract

Point-of-interest (POI) recommendation has been well studied in recent years. However, most of the existing methods focus on the recommendation scenarios where users can provide explicit feedback. In most cases, however, the feedback is not explicit, but implicit. For example, we can only get a user’s check-in behaviors from the history of what POIs she/he has visited, but never know how much she/he likes and why she/he does not like them. Recently, some researchers have noticed this problem and began to learn the user preferences from the partial order of POIs. However, these works give equal weight to each POI pair and cannot distinguish the contributions from different POI pairs. Intuitively, for the two POIs in a POI pair, the larger the frequency difference of being visited and the farther the geographical distance between them, the higher the contribution of this POI pair to the ranking function. Based on the above observations, we propose a weighted ranking method for POI recommendation. Specifically, we first introduce a Bayesian personalized ranking criterion designed for implicit feedback to POI recommendation. To fully utilize the partial order of POIs, we then treat the cost function in a weighted way, that is give each POI pair a different weight according to their frequency of being visited and the geographical distance between them. Data analysis and experimental results on two real-world datasets demonstrate the existence of user preference on different POI pairs and the effectiveness of our weighted ranking method.
Keywords: point-of-interest; location recommendation; LBSNs point-of-interest; location recommendation; LBSNs

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guo, L.; Jiang, H.; Wang, X.; Liu, F. Learning to Recommend Point-of-Interest with the Weighted Bayesian Personalized Ranking Method in LBSNs. Information 2017, 8, 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/info8010020

AMA Style

Guo L, Jiang H, Wang X, Liu F. Learning to Recommend Point-of-Interest with the Weighted Bayesian Personalized Ranking Method in LBSNs. Information. 2017; 8(1):20. https://doi.org/10.3390/info8010020

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guo, Lei, Haoran Jiang, Xinhua Wang, and Fangai Liu. 2017. "Learning to Recommend Point-of-Interest with the Weighted Bayesian Personalized Ranking Method in LBSNs" Information 8, no. 1: 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/info8010020

APA Style

Guo, L., Jiang, H., Wang, X., & Liu, F. (2017). Learning to Recommend Point-of-Interest with the Weighted Bayesian Personalized Ranking Method in LBSNs. Information, 8(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/info8010020

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop