Next Article in Journal
Raising the Ante of Communication: Evidence for Enhanced Gesture Use in High Stakes Situations
Next Article in Special Issue
Self-Organized Complexity and Coherent Infomax from the Viewpoint of Jaynes’s Probability Theory
Previous Article in Journal
Interdisciplinary Research between Theoretical Informatics and the Humanities

On Representation in Information Theory

Chemin du Collège, Les Diablerets CH-1865, Switzerland
Information 2011, 2(3), 560-578;
Received: 22 June 2011 / Revised: 23 August 2011 / Accepted: 26 August 2011 / Published: 19 September 2011
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Information and Energy/Matter)
Semiotics is widely applied in theories of information. Following the original triadic characterization of reality by Peirce, the linguistic processes involved in information—production, transmission, reception, and understanding—would all appear to be interpretable in terms of signs and their relations to their objects. Perhaps the most important of these relations is that of the representation-one, entity, standing for or representing some other. For example, an index—one of the three major kinds of signs—is said to represent something by being directly related to its object. My position, however, is that the concept of symbolic representations having such roles in information, as intermediaries, is fraught with the same difficulties as in representational theories of mind. I have proposed an extension of logic to complex real phenomena, including mind and information (Logic in Reality; LIR), most recently at the 4th International Conference on the Foundations of Information Science (Beijing, August, 2010). LIR provides explanations for the evolution of complex processes, including information, that do not require any entities other than the processes themselves. In this paper, I discuss the limitations of the standard relation of representation. I argue that more realistic pictures of informational systems can be provided by reference to information as an energetic process, following the categorial ontology of LIR. This approach enables naïve, anti-realist conceptions of anti-representationalism to be avoided, and enables an approach to both information and meaning in the same novel logical framework. View Full-Text
Keywords: dynamic opposition; interaction; logic, process; reality; representation dynamic opposition; interaction; logic, process; reality; representation
MDPI and ACS Style

Brenner, J.E. On Representation in Information Theory. Information 2011, 2, 560-578.

AMA Style

Brenner JE. On Representation in Information Theory. Information. 2011; 2(3):560-578.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Brenner, Joseph E. 2011. "On Representation in Information Theory" Information 2, no. 3: 560-578.

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop