Next Article in Journal
A SHACL-Based Approach for Enhancing Automated Compliance Checking with RDF Data
Previous Article in Journal
Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Loyalty Programmes Powered with Blockchain via an UTAUT2 Framework
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Impact of Augmented Reality Through User-Platform Interactions Towards Continuance Intention with the Effect of User Generation

Faculty of Engineering & IT, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney 2007, NSW, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Information 2024, 15(12), 758; https://doi.org/10.3390/info15120758
Submission received: 30 October 2024 / Revised: 25 November 2024 / Accepted: 26 November 2024 / Published: 29 November 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Information Systems)

Abstract

:
When users interact with mobile platforms in an Augmented Reality (AR) environment, cognitive and emotional engagements change through different stimuli cues that respond to users’ behavioral intentions. Although AR engages more interactions in mobile platforms, there is a significant gap in assessing UX, considering the physical distance between users and virtual products in a mobile platform. Considering the effect of user generation, the impacts of perceived engagements toward continuance intention through user-platform interactions are unexplored. This study investigated a nuanced understanding of how stimuli cues in augmented reality affect sense of immersion and sense of presence, followed by an Interaction-Engagement-Intention (I-E-I) model. A quantitative method was used to validate the proposed model. Based on an online survey with 886 responses, product fit, network quality, and Artificial Intelligence-driven Recommendation (AIR) influences were assessed for cognitive engagements. This study examined the importance of engaging satisfaction and trust as emotional engagements, influencing users’ continuance intention. The findings showed that sense of presence has a more significant influence on building trust and satisfaction. Also, trust has a more significant impact on the continuance intention to use AR mobile platforms. This study also explored the positive effects of user generation on continuance intention. This could enhance the capabilities of information system designers, researchers, marketing professionals, and solution providers to attain sustainable user retention.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Augmented Reality (AR) revolutionizes the mobile platform industry through interactive engagements. AR enhances User Experience (UX) through correlated actions among cognitive, physical, and virtual encounters to collaborate, cooperate, and communicate in the physical world [1]. This requirement has increased due to rapid changes in user expectations for Heterogeneous Human-computer Interaction (HCI). The effect of those interactions involves users’ engagements with AR applications that demand to assess users’ decision-making through continuance intention [2]. Previous literature has shown that exploring the effects of interactive engagements in perceiving UX for AR in the user-platform interaction paradigm is unrealized [3].
This study addressed a fundamental research interest to explain the consequences of user-platform interaction through product fit [4], network quality [5], and artificial intelligence-driven recommendation [6]. The study investigated how AR intrinsically motivated users’ cognitive engagement to perceive user experience [7] and explained a process of assessing users’ emotions through satisfaction and trust as subsequent effects of engagement. Finally, it explained how user engagement motivates user experience through cognitive and emotional values and understanding to facilitate the decision-making process on continuance intention [8].
In sociocultural aspects, this study described age group or generation as essential factors influencing users’ choices, values, and behavioral responses to interact with AR mobile platforms. This study considered generation as joint group of age users with equal shared beliefs, expectancy, dependency, attitudes, and responses to identify user groups within Australia for assessing their continuance intention to use AR mobile platforms [9]. Furthermore, this study determined the generation of users through age groups to identify user classifications with distinct sociocultural norms and their effects on continuance intention [10]. Moreover, the acculturated culture was addressed to explain the behavioral change of user generation who migrated from native to host culture in a multicultural society. This study explored the nuances of understanding the effects of generation on users’ continuance intention considering the multicultural society in Australia [11].
This study aims to deliver a research framework to explain how stimuli cues affect user experience through the perceived sense of immersion and a sense of presence that influences continuance intention. An online survey (N = 886) was conducted with an AR mobile platform (IKEA app version 4.5.0) to validate the interaction-engagement-intention (I-E-I) model. Then, a Partial Least Square (PLS)—structural equation model (SEM) approach was applied to analyze the data guided by the following research questions: RQ1: What are the key factors determining users’ continuance intention in the user-platform interaction paradigm? RQ2: What influences cognitive and emotional engagement on continuance intention? RQ3: What are the intervening effects of user generation towards continuance intention?
This study reveals that user-platform interactions through AR influence users’ continuance intention, encourage the user-retention process, and support the mobile platform industry in understanding how to assess user experience for user-platform interactions with an AR environment. It contributes to identifying the cognitive and emotional impact in perceiving user experience that influences continuance intention to use AR mobile platforms. Additionally, insights from the potential effects of generation on user behavior suggest that online retailers can plan to expand their AR platforms globally and should consider nuances in cultural values and generation gaps in their strategies. Moreover, research outcomes and valuable insights could guide UX researchers, developers, business promoters, marketing professionals, and solution providers to understand how sociocultural factors affect users on technology adoption to continue using technological platforms.
This paper is organized with a background section reviewing literature regarding augmented reality, sources of information, sense of immersion, sense of presence, user experience, and behavioral responses. It proceeds with methodology, where a research design, measurement instrument, and data-collection procedure are developed. Then, we proceed with the results section. Finally, the study discusses implications and limitations, followed by a conclusion.

2. Literature Review

In the e-commerce revolution, user-platform interactions engage interaction-based stimuli cues. Emerging technologies like AR have revolutionized the interaction capabilities for mobile platforms [12], where users can create a virtual identity to communicate, interact, and perform activities with mobile platforms and engage in a virtual environment through user-platform interaction [2]. Therefore, influences of cognitive [13] and emotional engagements [14] through user-platform interactions may be investigated for assessing user experience (UX) in an AR environment.
Previous studies explained that users interact with virtual products through spatial registration and gesture-based interaction by changing the orientation of physical spaces in an AR environment [15]. AR provides product fit through personalization, scale measurement, positioning, and virtual try-on features in the online platform industry. Conversely, network qualities were addressed as crucial to maintaining uninterrupted immersive services using mobile platforms [5]. Further, network quality is vital to maintaining the platform’s ability to provide uninterrupted services. In another context, artificial intelligence (AI) allows more interactions between users and platforms in an AR environment that may generate recommendations [16] and persuade cognitive engagements [4] to provide user comfort. Therefore, there is a knowledge gap in investigating the effects of stimuli cues, particularly in an AR environment.
Studies have shown that AR provides real-time interactions by placing computer-generated products in physical spaces [17], while virtual products can be viewed on the mobile platform. AR allows users to engage with sensory information through a user-platform interaction paradigm, which seems to be how users are sensing close to the real world. Considering user-platform interactions in an AR mobile application, cognitive engagement may represent users’ perceptions of products or services [18]. Previous studies have examined how users’ expectations are fulfilled through AR interactions that create a sense of immersion through users’ psychological responses [17]. In another context, the situated cognition theory explains that a sense of presence occurs when a user interacts with virtual products and perceives situated feeling as a unique psychological state of “being there” in the virtual world [19]. However, understanding the impacts of stimuli cues toward sense of immersion and sense of presence through user-platform interactions [3] in an AR environment may be explored.
A user’s emotional engagement is highly impacted by cognitive states, which may subsequently influence behavioral intentions [14]. Previous literature explains satisfaction [20,21] and trust [22] as emotional feelings, where the effects of cognitive states toward users’ emotional engagements [14] in an AR environment are still unrealized. Satisfaction develops a pleasant mode and trust as a mental state where a user confirms a willingness to perform actions after fulfilling expectations. Moreover, previous studies described trust and satisfaction as emotional factors influencing users’ behavioral responses through Word-of-Mouth (WOM) and repurchase intentions [23].
The term “continuance intention” was adapted from the Expectation-Confirmation Theory (ECT) in the field of consumer behavior literature [24]. Recently, researchers studied the effects of AR on continuance intention to use mobile platforms. Further, Hung and Rust [5] describe the continuance intention through cognitive states for AR mobile platforms. However, AR features may alleviate product user uncertainty and the need to touch the product [25] through user-platform interactions in a virtual environment where the effects of these critical AR characteristics on continuance intention through perceived UX can be investigated.
Previous studies suggest that user generation may impact users’ behavioral intention [26] to use AR mobile platforms. However, Cabanillas and Santos [10] categorize users with different age groups to explain users’ behavioral responses to adopting e-commerce platforms, where the effects of generation on users’ continuance intention in an AR environment are still unrealized. Generational engagements are vital in determining users’ behaviors, especially when adopting technological systems. The age group (e.g., Generation Z, Millennials, Generation X, Boomers) shows diverse behavioral intentions, societal engagements, influence mechanisms, and adoption tendencies in the technological adoption process [27,28]. In the immersive era, generational gaps may be investigated to assess the effects of generation on users’ continuance of intention to use AR mobile platforms.

3. Hypotheses Development and Research Model

AR involves product movement through tracking and engages a sense of immersion in an immersive environment [20]. In the context of AR applications, Kowalczuk explained the effects of network qualities in engaging a sense of immersion and feeling absorbed in the AR environment [29], while AR involves users with a high level of influence when placing virtual products in physical spaces. Moreover, online mobile platforms use feeling Artificial Intelligence (AI) through adaptive and personalized recommendation systems to extend predictive data analytics [5,16]. Therefore, the following hypotheses are proposed:
H1. 
Product fit positively influences the sense of immersion in user-platform interactions.
H2. 
Network quality positively influences the sense of immersion in user-platform interactions.
H3. 
AI-driven recommendation positively influences the sense of immersion in user-platform interactions.
In AR, Hilken defines situated experience as a sense of presence in an augmented reality environment [30]. Furthermore, AR features provide users comfort in viewing virtual products in their physical spaces, which alleviates product uncertainties and reduces the need for touch [31]. On the other hand, AI transforms wireless networks through network optimization with network parameters, enhancing the UX by adopting seamless convergence of virtual and physical realms that engage the sense of presence [32]. Therefore, we propose the following hypotheses:
H4. 
Product fit positively influences the sense of presence in user-platform interactions.
H5. 
Network quality positively influences the sense of presence in user-platform interactions.
Previous studies established that a sense of immersion engages users to sense virtual products through psychological ownership that persuades satisfaction [25]. Furthermore, prior studies explained that the AR environment enhances the sense of presence through the embodiment of a product and enhances the user’s impression through satisfaction [33,34]. Therefore, we are proposing the following hypotheses:
H6. 
Sense of immersion positively influences satisfaction in user-platform interactions.
H7. 
Sense of presence positively influences satisfaction in user-platform interactions.
Immersion engages closely with subjective sensation with product virtualization, and trust acts as a mediating construct that includes the effects of perceived immersive experiences [17]. AR can alleviate those issues by incorporating immersive features and building trust to interact with mobile platforms [35]. Grubert [15] defined the virtual body as being associated with the physical space, which develops a sense of presence that creates user trust. Furthermore, sense of presence creates a realization of “being there” in the physical space, enhancing trust in products [31]. Therefore, we are proposing the following hypotheses:
H8. 
Sense of immersion positively influences trust in user-platform interactions.
H9. 
Sense of presence positively influences trust in user-platform interactions.
Bhattacharjee emphasized that satisfaction with IS use is a prime concern for users to maintain usage intention [24]. Previous studies suggested that trust influences users’ willingness to use mobile apps [36]. Moreover, Balakrishnan describes the relationship between user trust and continuance intention to use technological systems [22]. Therefore, we propose the following hypotheses:
H10. 
Satisfaction positively influences continuance intention in user-platform interactions.
H11. 
Trust positively influences continuance intention in user-platform interactions.
In the context of age variations in a multicultural society, different age groups create a generation of users that significantly moderates behavioral intention to use mobile platforms. Previous studies have categorized users from various age groups and generations to explain the relationship between behavioral responses and the continuance of intention to use e-commerce platforms [10]. This generation prefers to communicate with images for innovative content, whereas the older generation communicates with text [37]. So, the different age groups with classifications of generations affect behavioral responses to adopt immersive technologies. Therefore, we propose the following hypothesis considering the effect of generation on continuance intention.
H12. 
The generation significantly impacts users’ continuance intention in the user-platform interaction.
Previous studies have followed the Stimulus-Organism-Response (S-O-R) paradigm to investigate immersive experience, repurchase, and continuance intentions [5,14]. This model was rooted in environmental psychology, which considered stimuli cues to explain cognitive reactions [38]. However, the effects of immersive stimuli cues [12], cognitive [13], and emotional [14] engagements toward users’ continuance intention may be explained through an adaptive and integrated model, followed by the SOR framework [23].
An Interaction-Engagement-Intention (I-E-I) model (as shown in Figure 1) was developed based on the SOR framework to determine how interactions-based stimuli cues (product fit, network quality, and AI-driven recommendation) affect user experience (sense of immersion and sense of presence) in the user-platform interaction paradigm. In the context of AR, the proposed model may identify cognitive engagements that involve the processing of sensory information through user-platform interactions. Further, it includes a sense of immersion as a cognitive engagement, reinforcing the model explaining UX through deep concentration in an AR environment. Concerning the virtual try-on effects, the model includes a sense of presence to explain how spatial orientations of virtual products involve users’ engagement with AR.
This I-E-I model includes attitude as an emotional feeling to explain virtual realism through the fulfillment of cognitive actualization. Further, satisfaction was considered an emotional engagement that supported the proposed model in assessing the confirmation of users’ expectations from AR mobile platforms. Subsequently, the I-E-I model incorporates continuance intention as a behavioral response resulting from perceived cognitive and emotional states. The proposed model also considers the effects of user generation on continuance intention to use an AR mobile platform.

4. Methodology

This study considered a quantitative approach that considered respondents, instruments, data-collection method, measuring technique, items, and data analytical processes to check the reliability of constructs, validate the proposed model, and test the hypotheses. A survey guideline (as shown in Appendix A) was designed to collect the quantitative data from the survey (Annex A). An ethical application was approved by the University of Technology Sydney (UTS HREC REF NO. ETH22-7706 on 9 August 2023) as the research study includes involving human participants to collect their experiences. We have followed all the UTS guidelines and human research ethics to conduct an online questionnaire survey.
An online questionnaire survey was conducted in Australia following a convenience snowball sampling technique. The study followed this technique because of the nature of the research, which could identify potential respondents who had already experienced interacting with the AR mobile platform (IKEA) and collect data from homogenous samples, considering the age group of respondents. Also, this study designed a few pre-requisite conditions to scrutinize respondents’ eligibility to enter into the main survey questionnaire.
This study has chosen IKEA as an experimental platform to investigate UX in an AR environment for a multicultural society. In the survey, IKEA was selected as an AR platform because of its unique true-to-scale feature to check the sense of presence from respondents, its large subscriber base with a versatile group of users, and state-of-the-art AR capabilities. Although there are some global AR mobile platforms like Amazon, Target, Nike, and Adidas, their AR features are not supported in Australia. Moreover, we have received permission from IKEA to survey their online users. We considered IKEA an extreme case in this study to externally validate the proposed model and hypotheses because of some limitations with other apps in Australia. Moreover, the research phenomenon also demands data collection from different age groups and user capabilities to interact with AR. Therefore, this study has chosen IKEA as an AR mobile platform that introduced AR technology in Australia.
This study considered product fit, network quality, and AI-driven recommendation as active Independent Variables (IV) applied to respondents through interventions. Further, sense of immersion, sense of presence, satisfaction, trust, and continuance intention were designed as Dependent Variables (DV). Moreover, user generation was considered an Attribute-Independent Variable (IV) that was an intrinsic characteristic of respondents. We considered constructs and measurement items from previous literature, constructed measurement items (Table A1, Appendix B) from validated instruments, and followed the measures of product fit from Sun et al. [25], network quality from Kowalczuk et al. [29], and AI-driven recommendations from Yin and Qiu [16]. We followed this with a sense of immersion from Dargan et al. [17] and a sense of presence from Alimamy and Gnoth [19]. This study also followed the measures of satisfaction from Park and Yoo [21] and David et al. [20], as well as trust from Kumar et al. [22]. The study relates to continuance intention as a behavioral response and measures continuance intention from Nguyen and Ha [36].
This study designed 17 questions for eight constructs to perform the measurement process. The survey data was collected from respondents of different age groups in Australia. To reduce bias, respondents were informed to fill out the questionnaire based on their perceived user experience [23]. Data were critically checked and computed using SPSS (IBM SPSS version 24.0.0.1) and cleaned through the proper validation. Finally, the sample size of 886 (N = 886) was confirmed, with a response rate of 84%. Sociodemographic characteristics were analyzed, and user profiles were prepared from responses. The respondents’ sociodemographic profile is shown in Table 1.
The study followed a partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) as a variance-based technique [39] to ensure robustness, predictive responses, and non-normality for the complex model with both formative and reflective constructs [8]. The study followed a two-stage approach: the measurement model assessment tests the reliability of all measurement items and tests the fitness of the outer model, and the structural model assessment evaluates the significance of path co-efficient for the inner model [29]. SmartPLS 4.0 (SmartPLS professional version 4.1.0.6) was used to execute the measurement assessment and develop a structure model to contrast the results. The measurement model acted as an outer model assessment with Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) to determine the reliability of survey instruments and the validity of constructs [29]. Then, the structural model was used as an inner model assessment to test the hypotheses [12].

5. Results

This study used confirmatory factor analysis to check the reliability and validity of the measurement items and constructs in the measurement model [9]. The measurement model was analyzed through factor loadings, Cronbach’s alpha, composite reliability, and Average Variance Extracted (AVE) to assess the reliability of the survey instrument. Table 2 describes the psychometric properties of all the constructs deployed in the study. As retrieved from the data, all the outer loadings are above 0.70, and the average variance extracted (AVE) values are above 0.50. Cronbach’s alpha value of all constructs was assessed from 0.750 to 0.924, which is higher than the recommended value of 0.7 [35]. CR values of all constructs were assessed as higher than the recommended value of 0.70. (i.e., from 0.752 to 0.927). Further, the AVE values were found to be higher than MSV (Maximum Shared Variance) and ASV (Average Shared Variance), which shows the strength of AVE and confirms the threshold for discriminant validity [14].
In the structural model assessment, we initially assessed the value of R2 for all dependent variables and then observed the collinearity statistics value for all the relationships [39]. The result showed that the value of R2 for all the variables was within the range of 0.11–0.25 (except sense of presence), which was recommended as a higher value. R2 values for sense of immersion (0.208), sense of presence (0.194), satisfaction (0.334), trust (0.272), and continuance intention (0.389) showed reasonable variance explained. Also, the collinearity statistics (VIF) value for all the relationships was less than 4.0 (as shown in Table 3).
The significance of the hypotheses was tested through path co-efficient (β), t-value, and p-value in the structural model assessment. All the hypotheses were supported with the p ˂ 0.05 level. The results for the AR environment showed that all hypotheses were supported and sources of information positively influenced users’ behavioral responses. The structural model results (hypothesis testing) are provided in Table 4.
The results showed that the effects of AI-driven recommendation on a sense of immersion (t value = 3.792) and product fit toward a sense of presence (t value = 2.787) were more significant. Further, the impacts of sense of presence on the relationship between satisfaction (t value = 9.740) and trust (t value = 8.964) were more significant. Similarly, the relationship of trust toward continuance intention (t value = 2.986) was higher than that of satisfaction with continuance intention (t value = 2.619).
We have tested the effects of attribute-independent variables (age group and gender) on continuance intention. Among the variables, gender did not have an impact on continuance intention. However, the age group significantly affected users’ continuance intention. In particular, Generation Z (β = 0.595, t = 2.863) had more significant effects rather than Generation X (β = 0.505, t = 2.285) and Millennials (β = 0.521, t = 2.504) on continuance intention (as shown in Table 5).

6. Discussion

This study contributed to the theoretical understanding of perceived user experience by considering user-platform interactions in AR mobile platforms, identifying and validating cognitive and emotional engagements, and investigating their impacts on users’ continuance intention. Although some of those variables have been determined in other contexts, we extended to empirical evidence of their applicability with user-platform interactions in the AR mobile platform context.
The I-E-I model extended the theoretical knowledge by explaining cognitive engagements through sense of immersion and sense of presence. The model also included satisfaction and trust as emotional feelings to explain the confirmation of users’ expectations from the AR mobile platform. The emotional engagements supported the model in assessing the users’ emotional feelings as an outcome of perceived cognitive engagements. The model also incorporated the generational effect on users’ continuance intention. It theorized a more vigorous and effective way to explain the perceived UX through user-platform interactions in an AR environment.
In this study, the results indicated the outcomes in continuation with the previous studies, as our findings supported the impact of perceived cognitive [12,22] and emotional factors [14] on continuance intention [39]. This study considered two cognitive variables to extant evidence as a claim that users respond to AR through user-platform interactions and co-create values through cognitive engagements. Further, the study examined two emotional variables to address users’ emotional reactions. Moreover, the findings confirmed that user generation significantly influences continuance intention. However, the results indicated that gender has no significant effect on users’ continuance intention. Therefore, users perceive UX through these perceived cognitive and emotional engagements that affect users’ continuance intention to use AR mobile platforms with the effect of user generation.
The results showed that sources of information, especially the effects of AI-driven recommendation on a sense of immersion and product fit toward a sense of presence, were more significant. Also, the influences of sense of presence toward satisfaction and trust were more significant. Similarly, the relationship of trust toward continuance intention was higher than that of satisfaction with continuance intention. The findings affirmed that generation significantly impacted users’ continuance intention in an AR environment. In particular, Generation Z influenced continuance intention more significantly than Generation X and Millennials.
This study contributed to the theoretical understanding of perceived UX considering AR by identifying and validating the cognitive and emotional factors and investigating their impacts on users’ continuance intention. The findings confirmed the significance of the relationships between cognitive and emotional engagements, extending the co-created values in perceiving UX.
Practically, this study complemented the value of optimizing app development and UX design through UX assessment. Online and interactive shopping benefits through AR were explored in this study as an integral part of information system research. In the context of processing sensory information through multi-modal AI interactions with AR, this study explained the value propositions of how AR engages more sensory information and allows users to interact with mobile platforms by alleviating product uncertainty and the need to touch the product.
Marketers can leverage the study’s findings to develop targeted marketing strategies that appeal to different demographic segments, particularly for Generation Z. Emphasizing the development of satisfaction and trust-building mechanisms can shape users’ perceptions and foster continued usage. Research findings could be applied to technologies like virtual reality (VR), the Internet of Things (IoT), and 5G in different industries.

7. Conclusions

The user experience is crucial for IS researchers in retaining users and moving toward the sustainable growth of AR mobile platforms in the e-commerce industry. AR involves more sensory information to users and supports them in changing their cognitive and emotional engagements through user-platform interactions. Consequently, these perceived values make users more satisfied and trusted in influencing continuance intention. This study empirically investigated the effects of interactions-based stimuli cues on user experience that influence continuance intention. Also, we have identified the mediation effects of trust and satisfaction on the relationship between the perceived sense of immersion, sense of presence, and continuance intention.
The UX assessment is crucial for IS researchers, and this study explained the consequences of perceived UX on continuance intention as an extension of user retention to achieve sustainable growth through AR adoption in the e-commerce industry. As a sustainable growth in the retail sector, user-platform interactions with augmented reality enhance immersive and interactive experiences, and this study confirmed the significance of examining the consequences of user-platform interactions in AR and their effects on continuance intention.
The focus on a particular AR platform, the IKEA app, may border the generalizability of findings because of its limited ability to collect data for a specific context. This study could be limited to context-dependent and multicultural environments that may not be realized in different contexts. There was a limitation in getting permission from platforms to conduct research considering their users. Further, the nature of the research could limit the study’s choice of a convenience snowball sampling technique to collect data from different age groups. Also, a particular age group, gender, or limited subscriber base would be a challenge in collecting data to validate the I-E-I model. Concerning immersive technologies, there needs to be more technical know-how and user capabilities to interact with AR mobile platforms.
Future research could address these limitations by employing more extensive and diverse samples, using objective measures, exploring different AR platforms with different contexts, and considering cross-cultural influences. The proposed model can be validated with other industries like tourism, health, education, and gaming. Moreover, a cumulative UX assessment can be extended to respondents who have been using AR for a long period.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.S.K.; Methodology, Z.S.K.; Software, Z.S.K.; Validation, Z.S.K.; Formal analysis, Z.S.K.; Investigation, Z.S.K.; Resources, Z.S.K.; Data curation, Z.S.K.; Writing—original draft preparation, Z.S.K.; Writing—review and editing, Z.S.K. and K.K.; Visualization, Z.S.K.; Supervision, K.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the national statement on ethical conduct in human research and the University of Technology Sydney (UTS) guidelines to conduct research, and approved by the Ethics Committee of UTS (Ethical approval number: UTS HREC REF No. ETH22-7706. Approval date: 9 August 2023) for studies involving human participation and getting their perceived experiences.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from participants before conducting a questionnaire survey. Moreover, ethical consent was received from IKEA to extend research, considering their platform and online users.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting this study’s findings is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A. Questionnaire Survey Guideline

Survey Guideline for Participant
Survey Objective: To test the reliability of constructs and validate the research model in perceiving user experience on continuance intention to use augmented reality (AR) mobile platforms.
Research Instruments: The study will survey online users to assess their user experience (UX). We have developed eight demographic and 17 UX questionnaires, which might take 20–30 min.
Recruitment procedure: We followed a convenience snowball sampling technique to select participants for the survey.
Research platform: Participants were requested to interact with an AR mobile platform before participating in the questionnaire survey. We preferred that participants interact with the IKEA mobile app or responsive website with an augmented reality (AR) view.
Downloading/using the platform: The IKEA app is registered with the Apple App Store and Google Play Store. The participants were requested to download the app. Alternatively, participants could enter the IKEA responsive website using their smartphones using the link https://www.ikea.com/au (accessed on 8 September 2023 or onwards).
All the products are still not available for 3D and augmented view. So, you can choose a malm drawer using the link below on your smartphone: https://www.ikea.com/au/en/p/malm-chest-of-4-drawers-white-20354646/ (accessed on 8 September 2023 or onwards). Alternatively, scan the QR code.
Information 15 00758 i001
Click the View in 3D button and press the AR Information 15 00758 i002 button on the page to locate the virtual product in your physical space.
Participate in the survey: After interacting with the IKEA mobile platform, you are requested to attend an online survey following any of the below options:
Option 1: Use a survey link to get access from a computer or phone.
Option 2: Scan the QR code to participate in the survey.
Information 15 00758 i003
Disclosure and privacy: We assure you that a secured analytical tool will collectively analyze your thoughts and opinions.
Your valuable experience will give us immense support in extending our research. Thank you again for your cooperation. If you have further queries about the research survey, please contact Zian Shah Kabir (PhD Student) at zian.kabir@student.uts.edu.au.

Appendix B. Measurement Items and Scales

Table A1. Items and Scale Measurement.
Table A1. Items and Scale Measurement.
ConstructItemsFactorsMeasurement Scales
Sources of information such as
Stimuli cues for AR mobile platforms





Cognitive engagement
as an organism


Emotional Engagement as an organism




Behavioral Response


P

NQ




AIR

SI

SP



SF

TR


CI

Product Fit
Sun et al. [25]


Network Quality
Kowalczuk et al. [29]


AI-driven recommendation
Yin and Qiu [16]


Sense of Immersion
Dargan et al. [17]



Sense of Presence
Alimamy and Gnoth [19]

Satisfaction
Park and Yoo [21], David et al. [20]

Trust
Kumar et al. [22]

Continuance Intention
Nguyen and Ha [36]


PF1: I could no longer doubt that the product would fit my desired spaces.
PF2: I could measure the product size to check for my desired space.

NQ1: The AR mobile platform performs its functions quickly and efficiently.
NQ2: The AR mobile platform is reliable (it is always active and running, performs without errors, and does what it is supposed to do).
AIR1: When interacting with the platform, AI marketing technology recommends what I want based on browsing habits.
AIR2: With the support of AI marketing technology, the AR mobile platform can arouse my shopping desire.
SI1: During the interactions, my body was in a physical place, but my mind was in the virtual world.
SI2: The AR mobile platform made me forget my immediate surroundings.
SP1: I felt like the product meshed with the AR mobile platform.
SP2: It seemed to me that I could do whatever I
wanted with the products in the AR mobile platform.
SF1: Overall, I am satisfied with the AR mobile platform.
SF2: The AR mobile platform meets my expectations.
TR1: I feel safer using the AR mobile platform.
TR2: I am pretty sure what to expect from the platform.

CI1: I intend to stay on as a member of using this AR mobile platform.
CI2: I will frequently use the AR mobile platform in the future.
CI3: I would prioritize the AR mobile platform over other alternative means.

References

  1. Ameen, T.A.; Shah, M.H.; Nusair, K. A cross-cultural study of gender differences in omnichannel retailing contexts. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 58, 102265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, Y.; Su, Z.; Zhang, N.; Xing, R.; Liu, D.; Luan, T.H.; Shen, X. A Survey on Metaverse: Fundamentals, Security, and Privacy. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2022, 25, 319–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chandler, T.; Richards, A.E.; Jenny, B.; Dickson, F.; Huang, J.; Klippel, A.; Neylan, M.; Wang, F.; Prober, S.M. Immersive landscapes: Modeling ecosystem reference conditions in virtual reality. Landsc. Ecol. 2022, 37, 1293–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Soliman, M.M.; Ahmed, E.; Darwish, A.; Hassanien, A.E. Artificial intelligence powered Metaverse: Analysis, challenges and future perspectives. Artif. Intell. Rev. 2024, 57, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Huang, M.-H.; Rust, R.T. A strategic framework for artificial intelligence in marketing. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2021, 49, 30–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Goti, A.; Querejeta-Lomas, L.; Almeida, A.; de la Puerta, J.G.; López-de-Ipiña, D. Artificial Intelligence in Business-to-Customer Fashion Retail: A Literature Review. Mathematics 2023, 11, 2943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jessen, A.; Hilken, T.; Chylinski, M.; Mahr, D.; Heller, J.; Keeling, D.I.; de Ruyter, K. The playground effect: How augmented reality drives creative customer engagement. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 116, 85–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Acharya, N.; Sassenberg, A.M.; Soar, J. The Role of Cognitive Absorption in Recommender System Reuse. Sustainability 2023, 15, 3896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Coves-Martínez, L.; Sabiote-Ortiz, C.M.; Frías-Jamilena, D.M. How to improve travel-app use continuance: The moderating role of culture. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2023, 45, 101070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liébana-Cabanillas, F.; Alonso-Dos-Santos, M. Factors that determine the adoption of Facebook commerce: The moderating effect of age. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 2017, 44, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kim, M.J.; Gorman, B.K. Acculturation and Self-rated Health Among Asian Immigrants: The Role of Gender and Age. Popul. Res. Policy Rev. 2022, 41, 89–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nazir, S.; Khadim, S.; Ali Asadullah, M.; Syed, N. Exploring the influence of artificial intelligence technology on consumer repurchase intention: The mediation and moderation approach. Technol. Soc. 2023, 72, 102190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Qin, H.; Peak, D.A.; Prybutok, V. A virtual market in your pocket: How does mobile augmented reality (MAR) influence consumer decision-making? J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 58, 102337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Goel, P.; Garg, A.; Sharma, A.; Rana, N.P. Impact of Sensory Perceptions on the Urge to Buy Impulsively. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 2023; ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar]
  15. Grubert, J.; Merkle, D. I mixed Reality Interaction Techniques. In Springer Handbook of Augmented Reality; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2023; pp. 109–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yin, J.; Qiu, X. Ai technology and online purchase intention: Structural equation model based on perceived value. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dargan, S.; Bansal, S.; Kumar, M.; Mittal, A.; Kumar, K. Augmented Reality: A Comprehensive Review. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 2023, 30, 1057–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yim, M.Y.-C.; Chu, S.-C.; Sauer, P.L. Is Augmented Reality Technology an Effective Tool for E-commerce? An Interactivity and Vividness Perspective. J. Interact. Mark. 2017, 39, 89–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Alimamy, S.; Gnoth, J. I want it my way! The effect of perceptions of personalization through augmented reality and online shopping on customer intentions to co-create value. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2022, 128, 107105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. David, A.; Senn, W.D.; Peak, D.A.; Prybutok, V.R.; Blankson, C. The value of visual and service quality to augmented reality-enabled mobile shopping experience. Qual. Manag. J. 2021, 28, 116–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Park, M.; Yoo, J. Effects of perceived interactivity of augmented reality on consumer responses: A mental imagery perspective. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020, 52, 101912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kumar, P.; Chauhan, S.; Gupta, P.; Jaiswal, M.P. A meta-analysis of trust in mobile banking: The moderating role of cultural dimensions. Int. J. Bank Mark. 2023, 41, 1207–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Al-Adwan, A.S.; Al-Debei, M.M.; Dwivedi, Y.K. E-commerce in high uncertainty avoidance cultures: The driving forces of repurchase and word-of-mouth intentions. Technol. Soc. 2022, 71, 102083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bhattacherjee, A. Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. Manag. Inf. Syst. Q. 2001, 25, 351–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sun, C.; Fang, Y.; Kong, M.; Chen, X.; Liu, Y. Influence of augmented reality product display on consumers’ product attitudes: A product uncertainty reduction perspective. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2022, 64, 102828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Koscielniak, M.; Bojanowska, A.; Gasiorowska, A. Religiosity Decline in Europe: Age, Generation, and the Mediating Role of Shifting Human Values. J. Relig. Health 2024, 63, 1091–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nwobodo, S.; Weissmann, M.A. Common traits in online shopping behavior: A study of different generational cohorts. Glob. Bus. Organ. Excell. 2024, 43, 46–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wilson, B. Book Review: Marketing to Gen Z: The Rules for Reaching This Vast and Very Different Generation of Influencers. J. Macromarketing 2019, 39, 228–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kowalczuk, P.; Siepmann, C.; Adler, J. Cognitive, affective, and behavioral consumer responses to augmented reality in e-commerce: A comparative study. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 124, 357–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hilken, T.; de Ruyter, K.; Chylinski, M.; Mahr, D.; Keeling, D.I. Augmenting the eye of the beholder: Exploring the strategic potential of augmented reality to enhance online service experiences. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2017, 45, 884–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, X.W.; Riaz, M.; Haider, S.; Alam, K.M.; Yang, M. Information Sharing on Social Media by Multicultural Individuals: Experiential, Motivational, and Network Factors. J. Glob. Inf. Manag. 2021, 29, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Schubert, T.W. A New Conception of Spatial Presence: Once Again, with Feeling. Commun. Theory 2009, 19, 161–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chylinski, H.J.; Hilken, T.; Keeling, D.I.; Mahr, D.; de Ruyter, K. Augmented reality marketing: A technology-enabled approach to situated customer experience. Australas. Mark. J. 2020, 28, 374–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Heller, J.; Chylinski, M.; de Ruyter, K.; Mahr, D.; Keeling, D.I. Touching the Untouchable: Exploring Multi-Sensory Augmented Reality in the Context of Online Retailing. J. Retail. 2019, 95, 219–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Payal, R.; Sharma, N.; Dwivedi, Y.K. Unlocking the impact of brand engagement in the metaverse on Real-World purchase intentions: Analyzing Pre-Adoption behavior in a futuristic technology platform. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2024, 65, 101381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nguyen, G.D.; Ha, M.T. The role of user adaptation and trust in understanding continuance intention towards mobile shopping: An extended expectation-confirmation model. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2021, 8, 1980248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Prakashyadav, S.; Rai, S. Generation Z’s Preference for Innovative Content: An Analysis. Int. J. Digit. Mark. 2017, 8, 23–36. [Google Scholar]
  38. Mehrabian, A.; Russell, J.A. An Approach To Environmental Psychology; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  39. Al Amin, M. The Influence of Psychological, Situational and Interactive Technological Feedback-Related Variables on Customers’ Technology Adoption to Use Online Shopping Applications. J. Glob. Mark. 2022, 35, 384–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Interaction-Engagement-Intention model.
Figure 1. Interaction-Engagement-Intention model.
Information 15 00758 g001
Table 1. Respondents’ sociodemographic profile (N = 886).
Table 1. Respondents’ sociodemographic profile (N = 886).
CharacteristicsValuesFrequencyPercentage (%)
GenderMale53360.2%
Female34538.9%
I prefer not to say80.9%
GenerationGeneration Z (18–26 years)20222.8%
Millennial (27–42 years)47153.2%
Generation X (43–58 years)16718.8%
Boomers II (59 years or above)465.2%
Education LevelPrimary262.9%
Secondary728.1%
Bachelor’s degree52459.1%
Vocational or similar12914.6%
Not attended in Australia13515.2%
Employment StatusStudent293.3%
Working full-time9911.2%
Working part-time68977.8%
Unemployed343.8%
Self-employed50.6%
Others303.4%
Annual IncomeLess than 18,200 AUD192.1%
18,201–45,000 AUD28131.7%
45,001–120,000 AUD47757.2%
120,001–180,000 AUD576.4%
More than 180,000222.5%
Table 2. Measurement Model Assessment.
Table 2. Measurement Model Assessment.
ConstructsItemsFactor LoadingCronbach’s AlphaComposite Reliability (rho_a)Average Variance Extracted (AVE)
Product fitPF10.9580.9110.8550.919
PF20.959
Network qualityNQ10.9460.8790.8790.892
NQ20.943
AI-driven recommendationAIR10.9240.9240.9270.929
AIR20.966
Sense of immersionSI10.9520.9020.9030.911
SI20.956
Sense of presenceSP10.9430.8800.8800.834
SP20.946
SatisfactionSF10.9580.9120.9120.919
SF20.960
TrustTR10.9430.8810.8820.894
TR20.948
Continuance intentionCI10.8190.7500.7520.724
CI20.833
CI30.798
Table 3. R-square statistics and Collinearity statistics (VIF).
Table 3. R-square statistics and Collinearity statistics (VIF).
R2 StatisticsCollinearity Statistics (VIF)
ConstructR-SquareR-Square AdjustedRelationshipVIF
SI0.2080.204PF -> SP1.000
SP0.1940.191NQ -> SN1.235
SF0.3340.331AIR -> SN1.235
TR0.2720.271SI -> SF1.250
CI0.3890.387SP -> SF1.480
SI -> TR1.348
SP -> TR1.354
SF -> CI1.178
TR -> CI1.278
Table 4. Summary of hypotheses testing results.
Table 4. Summary of hypotheses testing results.
Hypothesized
Relationship
Mean (M)Std. DeviationT Statisticsp ValuesHypothesis Result
H1: PF -> SI0.1500.0351.4390.001 ***Yes
H2: NQ -> SI0.1560.0582.6880.007 **Yes
H3: AIR -> SI0.1360.0363.7920.001 ***Yes
H4: PF -> SP0.1970.0352.7870.003 **Yes
H5: NQ -> SP0.1040.0522.1040.044 *Yes
H6: SI -> SF0.2270.0366.3250.000 ***Yes
H7: SP -> SF0.3430.0359.7400.000 ***Yes
H8: SI -> TR0.2260.0376.0890.000 ***Yes
H9: SP -> TR0.3210.0368.9640.000 ***Yes
H10: SF -> CI0.1120.0422.6190.009 **Yes
H11: TR -> CI0.1250.0422.9860.003 **Yes
Note: p > 0.05 = ns (not significant), p < 0.05 = *, p < 0.01 = **, p < 0.001 = ***.
Table 5. Effects of variables test analysis result.
Table 5. Effects of variables test analysis result.
Effect of
Attribute IV
Original Sample (O)Sample Mean (M)Standard Deviation T Statistics p ValuesSignificance
Generation Z -> CI0.5950.6010.2082.8630.002 **Significant
Millennial -> CI0.5210.5250.2082.5040.006 **Significant
Generation X -> CI0.5050.5120.2212.2850.011 *Significant
Note: p ˃ 0.05 = ns (not significant), p ˂ 0.05 = *, p ˂ 0.01 = **.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kabir, Z.S.; Kang, K. The Impact of Augmented Reality Through User-Platform Interactions Towards Continuance Intention with the Effect of User Generation. Information 2024, 15, 758. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15120758

AMA Style

Kabir ZS, Kang K. The Impact of Augmented Reality Through User-Platform Interactions Towards Continuance Intention with the Effect of User Generation. Information. 2024; 15(12):758. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15120758

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kabir, Zian Shah, and Kyeong Kang. 2024. "The Impact of Augmented Reality Through User-Platform Interactions Towards Continuance Intention with the Effect of User Generation" Information 15, no. 12: 758. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15120758

APA Style

Kabir, Z. S., & Kang, K. (2024). The Impact of Augmented Reality Through User-Platform Interactions Towards Continuance Intention with the Effect of User Generation. Information, 15(12), 758. https://doi.org/10.3390/info15120758

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop