Next Article in Journal
Pathways to Attempted Suicide as Reflected in the Narratives of People with Lived Experience
Next Article in Special Issue
Post-Secularism in a World-Historical Light: The Axial Age Thesis as an Alternative to Secularization
Previous Article in Journal
Transcultural Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of Portuguese Version of the Spiritual Needs Questionnaire (SpNQ) Among HIV Positive Patients in Brazil
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Cristo moreno in Barcelona: The Staging of Identity-Based Unity and Difference in the Procession of the Lord of Miracles
Article

Drugs and Religion: Contributions to the Debate on the Science–Religion Interface

1
Department of Social Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59078-970, Brazil
2
Collegiate of Social Sciences, Federal University of Tocantins, Palmas 77001-090, Brazil
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Religions 2018, 9(4), 136; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel9040136
Received: 13 March 2018 / Revised: 11 April 2018 / Accepted: 12 April 2018 / Published: 18 April 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Public Role of Religion)
In this article, we present the results of our research, which aims to comprehend how the relationship between religion and the use of drugs operates in various contexts, but especially in the context of a prohibitionist paradigm. On the one hand, the story of human religious worship entails drug use, and on the other hand, religious groups form a set of important protagonists in the current “drug problem”, whether as moral agents or direct action activists (individual or community-based), and above all in close contact with the users. In one of these studies, we evaluated the public presence of Brazilian religions that use psychoactive substances ritually, and we verify that in the State’s regulatory process of this use, the presence of the scientific reference was a defining factor in the creation of public policies, and therefore, within the scope of civil rights for religious freedom. In another study, we evaluated the discourse of twenty religious leaders in the city of Natal, Rio Grande do Norte—Brazil about drug use. We perceived that they have, in general, three stances: pure and simple condemnation, with no corresponding action in the public sphere; the use of substances considered drugs, along with public actions focused on the effort to gain acceptance of this practice; and finally, “comprehensive” condemnation, with frequent public group action or rehabilitation centers. Scientific references, in this study, permeate the discourse as an authenticating force in the religious speech. Ultimately, this reality allows us to question how the academic discourse unfolds in the scope of religion, interfering in the quality and intensity of its actions with relation to drugs, and we conclude that academic posture, often underestimated with relation to the religious institutions, does not aid in the effort to confront the social problems linked to drug abuse. Therefore, an increased interaction between academia and these institutions can generate a new approach to this very serious social problem in Brazil. View Full-Text
Keywords: drugs; religion and drugs; science and religion drugs; religion and drugs; science and religion
MDPI and ACS Style

Lopes, O., Jr.; Costa, J. Drugs and Religion: Contributions to the Debate on the Science–Religion Interface. Religions 2018, 9, 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel9040136

AMA Style

Lopes O Jr., Costa J. Drugs and Religion: Contributions to the Debate on the Science–Religion Interface. Religions. 2018; 9(4):136. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel9040136

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lopes, Orivaldo, Jr., and Janaína Costa. 2018. "Drugs and Religion: Contributions to the Debate on the Science–Religion Interface" Religions 9, no. 4: 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel9040136

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop