Next Article in Journal
“A Religious Recognition of Equality”: Liberal Spirituality and the Marriage Question in America, 1835–1850
Next Article in Special Issue
Performative Framing: Dza Patrul Rinpoche’s Performative Pedagogy
Previous Article in Journal
Introduction to “Cognitive Science and the Study of Yoga and Tantra”
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dazzling Displays and Hidden Departures: Bodhisattva Pedagogy as Performance in the Biographies of Two Twentieth Century Tibetan Buddhist Masters
Article Menu
Issue 9 (September) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessFeature PaperArticle
Religions 2017, 8(9), 174;

How to Constitute a Field of Merit: Structure and Flexibility in a Tibetan Buddhist Monastery’s Curriculum

Department of Religion, Bard College, 30 Campus Rd, Annandale-on-Hudson, NY 12504, USA
Received: 17 August 2017 / Revised: 17 August 2017 / Accepted: 23 August 2017 / Published: 7 September 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pedagogy and Performance in Tibetan Buddhism)
Full-Text   |   PDF [254 KB, uploaded 7 September 2017]


The written curriculum of Tibet’s prestigious Mindrölling monastery, composed in 1689, marries a firm pedagogical structure with flexibility for individual students. This reflects the monastery’s balance of institutional priorities, shaped by its religious, cultural, and political climate. The curriculum’s author was Terdak Lingpa, a charismatic visionary and systematizer of the “Ancient” or Nyingma school of Tibetan Buddhism who forged alliances with the Fifth Dalai Lama’s government in Lhasa starting in the seventeenth century. As part of Mindrölling’s formal constitutional document, the curriculum commits students and teachers to a distinctive approach to Buddhist training and helps to constitute the monastery and its members as a Buddhist “field of merit.” As such, Mindrölling is presented as a worthy recipient of support and protection from patrons and of respect from the community. The curriculum reflects a variety of overarching priorities for a relatively diverse student body over time and therefore calls for individual flexibility within a reliable and sustainable institutional structure. In this way, the curriculum demonstrates Mindrölling’s identity as a bridge between the potentially competing values of the Tibetan Buddhist schools of the author’s day. View Full-Text
Keywords: Tibet; Buddhism; curriculum; Nyingma; pedagogy; performative Tibet; Buddhism; curriculum; Nyingma; pedagogy; performative
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Townsend, D. How to Constitute a Field of Merit: Structure and Flexibility in a Tibetan Buddhist Monastery’s Curriculum. Religions 2017, 8, 174.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Religions EISSN 2077-1444 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert Logo copyright Steve Bridenbaugh/UUA
Back to Top