A printed edition of this Special Issue is available at MDPI Books....
Should CRISPR Scientists Play God?
GTU/CTNS, 2400 Ridge Road, Berkeley, CA 94709, USA
Academic Editor: Noreen L. Herzfeld
Religions 2017, 8(4), 61; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel8040061
Received: 8 February 2017 / Revised: 1 April 2017 / Accepted: 5 April 2017 / Published: 7 April 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Religion and the New Technologies)
Will CRISPR usher in a new era of Promethean overreach? CRISPR makes gene editing widely available and cheap. Anti-play-god bioethicists fear that geneticists will play god and precipitate a backlash from nature that could be devastating. In contrast to the anti-play-god bioethicists, this article recommends that laboratory science invoke the Precautionary Principle: pause at the yellow caution light, but then with constant risk-assessment proceed ahead. View Full-Text
Keywords: CRISPR; Cas9; Prometheus; play god; stem cells; bioethics; germline intervention; Precautionary Principle
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
MDPI and ACS Style
Peters, T. Should CRISPR Scientists Play God? Religions 2017, 8, 61.
AMA StyleShow more citation formats Show less citations formats
Peters T. Should CRISPR Scientists Play God? Religions. 2017; 8(4):61.Chicago/Turabian Style
Peters, Ted. 2017. "Should CRISPR Scientists Play God?" Religions 8, no. 4: 61.
Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.