Orthodox Dogmatic Teaching and Its Varieties in the Development of Modern Greek Theology

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The presentation of information is supported by a balanced paragraph structure and a clear delimitation of subtopics, the broad and reflective style leads, in places, to extended formulations that could have benefited from greater conciseness. However, the work as a whole maintains argumentative coherence and offers a unified picture of the topic addressed, presenting the information in an organized form and appropriate to the requirements of a solid research.

Author Response

Thank you very much for this insightful comment. I appreciate your recognition of the argumentative coherence and the organized and balanced presentation of the information in my aper. I also appreciate the comment on the study’s “occasional tendency to extended formulations.” In this context, I have revised some sections of the manuscript in order to enhance clarity and conciseness, particularly in cases in which the reflective approach was at risk of leading to “long sentences.” I also changed the conclusion and I added more relevant comments in the ending paragraphs of every section. I thank the reviewer for their useful comments that have helped to improve the clarity and readability of the paper as a whole.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Congratulations on this important contribution. The approach taken around these four contemporary Greek authors is very relevant. As the article is written in Latin characters, I suggest that the bibliographic references in the footnotes also be written in Latin characters. The attached document indicates some typographical errors and suggests ways to improve the text.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you very much for your supportive and constructive comments. I would like to express my appreciation for your positive evaluation of the article and for underlining the significance of the approach based on these four contemporary Greek theologians.

I have revised the attached document and implemented all of the corrections and suggestions mentioned in the PDF file. Furthermore, I have revised some sections of the article in order to improve its clarity and precision where necessary. Additionally, I have added more bibliographical references where the argument needed additional support, thus enriching the overall academic quality of the article.

According to your suggestion, all of the bibliographical references cited in the footnotes of the article have been transliterated and written entirely in Latin characters in order to ensure consistency of language with the rest of the article.

Furthermore, I have revised the conclusion of the article significantly in order to present a clearer summary of the overall arguments and enhance its coherence.

I would like to express my appreciation for your supportive and constructive comments. They have greatly improved the final version of the article.