Next Article in Journal
‘Go and Prophesy in Your Own Land’: Foreign Prophets and Popularism in South Africa. Evoking the Need of Jonathanic Theology for Peaceful Resolution of Difference
Next Article in Special Issue
The Figure of Pontius Pilate in Josephus Compared with Philo and the Gospel of John
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Alexander Janneus as High Priest and King: Struggling between Jewish and Hellenistic Concepts of Rule

On Triads, Teleology, and Tensions in Antiquities 18–20

Department of Jewish History and Contemporary Jewry, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91905, Israel
Religions 2020, 11(1), 41;
Received: 27 November 2019 / Revised: 29 December 2019 / Accepted: 3 January 2020 / Published: 12 January 2020
Josephus liked to organize material in three-part structures, which imparted a sense of completion by indicating to readers that an end had been reached. This study focuses on Books 18–20 of Josephus’s Antiquities, which are organized as such a triad: Book 18 opens Roman rule in Judea and adumbrates the final clash and catastrophe, Book 19 creates some suspense by detailing two possible interruptions that could have changed the course of history but in the end came to nothing, and so Book 20 resumes the story from the end of Book 18 and takes it down to the destruction of Jerusalem. Moreover, all three books, together, form a unit in a larger triad: the story told, in the second half of Antiquities, of Judea’s move from sovereignty under the Hasmoneans (Books 12–14), to nominal sovereignty under Herod (Books 15–17), to subjugation to Rome (Books 18–20). This focus on political history is, however, contradicted in various ways, both by Josephus’s development from a Judean into a Jew of the Diaspora, who focused more on religion than on state, and by various sources used by Josephus, that pulled in other directions. View Full-Text
Keywords: Josephus; Antiquities; Judean; triads; teleology Josephus; Antiquities; Judean; triads; teleology
MDPI and ACS Style

Schwartz, D.R. On Triads, Teleology, and Tensions in Antiquities 18–20. Religions 2020, 11, 41.

AMA Style

Schwartz DR. On Triads, Teleology, and Tensions in Antiquities 18–20. Religions. 2020; 11(1):41.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Schwartz, Daniel R. 2020. "On Triads, Teleology, and Tensions in Antiquities 18–20" Religions 11, no. 1: 41.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop