Next Article in Journal
Views on Religious Freedom among Young People in Belarus and Norway: Similarities and Contrasts
Next Article in Special Issue
Becoming Animal: Karma and the Animal Realm Envisioned through an Early Yogācāra Lens
Previous Article in Journal
The Hermeneutics of Contentious Imagery: What Exactly the Zhuangzi Has to Say about the Straw Dogs in the Laozi
Previous Article in Special Issue
Animals in Medieval Chinese Biographies of Buddhist Monks
Open AccessArticle

Humans as Animals and Things in Pre-Buddhist China

History Department, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-2550, USA
Religions 2019, 10(6), 360; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10060360
Received: 14 April 2019 / Revised: 27 May 2019 / Accepted: 27 May 2019 / Published: 31 May 2019
This paper examines the way thinkers in the pre-Buddhist world in China viewed the animal-human divide. It argues that the boundaries between humans and animals were porous. The only unique capacities that human beings are credited with were first (widely) the ability to develop their unique potentials (chengren 成人), and, second (in a very few texts), the capacity to respond with greater sensitivity to the resonant world around them. In both contexts, the extant terms make use of two terms, ling 靈 and jingshen 精神. Part II of the essay then turns to examine the most influential Euro-American theories cited in today’s secondary literature regarding the animal-human divide. None of these seem remotely like the theories articulated in early China. In Part III, the essay examines vitalism, which is an unusual instance in early modern Europe where an important theory seems to approach the views of early China, with the express aim of reminding readers that we need not automatically posit an impassable gulf between East and West, but can, instead, profit from wider reading that yields more comparative insights. View Full-Text
Keywords: jingshen 精神; chengren 成人; vitalism; animals; human rights; bestiality; early China jingshen 精神; chengren 成人; vitalism; animals; human rights; bestiality; early China
MDPI and ACS Style

Nylan, M. Humans as Animals and Things in Pre-Buddhist China. Religions 2019, 10, 360.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop