Next Article in Journal
Vulnerability, Response-Ability, and the Promise of Making Refuge
Next Article in Special Issue
Seeing and Hearing in the Laozi and Zhuangzi and the Question of Authority and Authenticity
Previous Article in Journal
Political Economy as a Test of Modern Judaism
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Dreamer and Their Authenticity in the Zhuangzi
Article

The Relationship between Authority and Authenticity in the Laozi: Employing Wu無as a Philosophical Framework

Department of Philosophy, East China Normal University, 500 Dongchuan Road, Minhang, Shanghai 200241, China
Religions 2019, 10(2), 79; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10020079
Received: 6 December 2018 / Revised: 21 January 2019 / Accepted: 22 January 2019 / Published: 25 January 2019
Wu 無is one of the most prominent terms in Ancient Daoist philosophy, and perhaps the only term to appear more than Dao in both the Laozi and the Zhuangzi. However, unlike Dao, wu is generally used as an adjective modifying or describing nouns such as “names”, “desires”, “knowledge”, “action”, and so forth. Whereas Dao serves as the utmost principle in both generation and practice, wu becomes one of the central methods to achieve or emulate this ideal. As a term of negation, wu usually indicates the absence of something, as seen in its relation to the term you 有—“to have” or “presence”. From the perspective of generative processes, wu functions as an undefined and undifferentiated cosmic situation from which no beginning can begin but everything can emerge. In the political aspect, wu defines, or rather un-defines the actions (non-coercive action, wuwei無為) that the utmost authority exerts to allow the utmost simplicity and “authenticity” (the zi自constructions) of the people. In this paper, I suggest an understanding of wu as a philosophical framework that places Pre-Qin Daoist thought as a system that both promotes our understanding of the way the world works and offers solutions to particular problems. Wu then is simultaneously metaphysical and concrete, general, and particular. It is what allows the world, the society, and the person to flourish on their own terms. View Full-Text
Keywords: Daoism; Laozi; authority; authenticity; wu Daoism; Laozi; authority; authenticity; wu
MDPI and ACS Style

Small, S.Y. The Relationship between Authority and Authenticity in the Laozi: Employing Wu無as a Philosophical Framework. Religions 2019, 10, 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10020079

AMA Style

Small SY. The Relationship between Authority and Authenticity in the Laozi: Employing Wu無as a Philosophical Framework. Religions. 2019; 10(2):79. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10020079

Chicago/Turabian Style

Small, Sharon Y. 2019. "The Relationship between Authority and Authenticity in the Laozi: Employing Wu無as a Philosophical Framework" Religions 10, no. 2: 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10020079

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop