Next Article in Journal
Social Cohesion in Australia: Comparing Church and Community
Previous Article in Journal
Crux Christi Sit Mecum: Devotion to the Apotropaic Cross
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Preliminary Controlled Vocabulary for the Description of Hagiographic Texts
Open AccessArticle

Comparative Hagiology and/as Manuscript Studies: Method and Materiality

Department of English, The University of Texas at El Paso, 500 University Ave, El Paso, TX 79968-0526, USA
Religions 2019, 10(11), 604; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel10110604
Received: 11 October 2019 / Revised: 26 October 2019 / Accepted: 28 October 2019 / Published: 31 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Comparative Hagiology: Issues in Theory and Method)
Although the academic study of hagiography continues to flourish, the role of comparative methods within the study of sanctity and the saints remains underutilized. Similarly, while much valuable work on saints and sanctity relies on materialist methodologies, issues of critical bibliography particular to the study of hagiography have not received the theoretical attention they deserve. This essay takes up these two underattended approaches to argue for a comparative materialist approach to hagiography. Through a short case study of the Latin Vita of Lutgard of Aywières (1182–1246) written by the Dominican friar Thomas of Cantimpré (c. 1200–1270), I suggest that comparative material research into the textual history of hagiographic literature can provide us with a more comprehensive and nuanced picture of the production of any specific holy figure, as well as the evolving discourses of sanctity and holiness in general. While this suggestion emerges from my own work on medieval hagiography from the Christian Latin West, it resonates with recent arguments by Sara Ritchey and David DiValerio to call for a materially comparative approach to narratives of holy lives in any religious tradition in any time period. Furthermore, I suggest that medieval studies, and in particular medieval manuscript studies, may have much to offer to scholars of sanctity working in later periods and other settings. Offering a view of material textual scholarship as intrinsically comparative, we may expand our theoretical definitions of the comparative and its possibilities within the study of sanctity. View Full-Text
Keywords: comparative literature; comparative method; comparative religions; critical bibliography; hagiography; hagiology; manuscript studies; medieval Christianity; religious studies; sainthood comparative literature; comparative method; comparative religions; critical bibliography; hagiography; hagiology; manuscript studies; medieval Christianity; religious studies; sainthood
MDPI and ACS Style

Zimbalist, B. Comparative Hagiology and/as Manuscript Studies: Method and Materiality. Religions 2019, 10, 604.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop