Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Observations and Predictions of Wave Runup, Extreme Water Levels, and Medium-Term Dune Erosion during Storm Conditions
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Modeling Storm Surge and Inundation in Washington, DC, during Hurricane Isabel and the 1936 Potomac River Great Flood
Open AccessArticle

Channel Shallowing as Mitigation of Coastal Flooding

1
Davidson Laboratory, Stevens Institute of Technology, Castle Point on Hudson, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA
2
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Portland State University, Post Office Box 751, Portland, OR 97207-0751, USA
3
ARCADIS, 630 Plaza Drive, Suite 100, Highlands Ranch, CO 80129, USA
4
Center for International Earth Science Information Networks, Columbia University, PO Box 1000, 61 Route 9W, Palisades, NY 10964, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Rick Luettich
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2015, 3(3), 654-673; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse3030654
Received: 4 May 2015 / Revised: 4 May 2015 / Accepted: 6 July 2015 / Published: 21 July 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Coastal Hazards Related to Storm Surge)
Here, we demonstrate that reductions in the depth of inlets or estuary channels can be used to reduce or prevent coastal flooding. A validated hydrodynamic model of Jamaica Bay, New York City (NYC), is used to test nature-based adaptation measures in ameliorating flooding for NYC's two largest historical coastal flood events. In addition to control runs with modern bathymetry, three altered landscape scenarios are tested: (1) increasing the area of wetlands to their 1879 footprint and bathymetry, but leaving deep shipping channels unaltered; (2) shallowing all areas deeper than 2 m in the bay to be 2 m below Mean Low Water; (3) shallowing only the narrowest part of the inlet to the bay. These three scenarios are deliberately extreme and designed to evaluate the leverage each approach exerts on water levels. They result in peak water level reductions of 0.3%, 15%, and 6.8% for Hurricane Sandy, and 2.4%, 46% and 30% for the Category-3 hurricane of 1821, respectively (bay-wide averages). These results suggest that shallowing can provide greater flood protection than wetland restoration, and it is particularly effective at reducing "fast-pulse" storm surges that rise and fall quickly over several hours, like that of the 1821 storm. Nonetheless, the goal of flood mitigation must be weighed against economic, navigation, and ecological needs, and practical concerns such as the availability of sediment. View Full-Text
Keywords: storm surge; flooding; tides; adaptation; wetlands; bathymetry; hurricane; Hurricane Sandy; Jamaica Bay; New York City storm surge; flooding; tides; adaptation; wetlands; bathymetry; hurricane; Hurricane Sandy; Jamaica Bay; New York City
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Orton, P.M.; Talke, S.A.; Jay, D.A.; Yin, L.; Blumberg, A.F.; Georgas, N.; Zhao, H.; Roberts, H.J.; MacManus, K. Channel Shallowing as Mitigation of Coastal Flooding. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2015, 3, 654-673. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse3030654

AMA Style

Orton PM, Talke SA, Jay DA, Yin L, Blumberg AF, Georgas N, Zhao H, Roberts HJ, MacManus K. Channel Shallowing as Mitigation of Coastal Flooding. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2015; 3(3):654-673. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse3030654

Chicago/Turabian Style

Orton, Philip M.; Talke, Stefan A.; Jay, David A.; Yin, Larry; Blumberg, Alan F.; Georgas, Nickitas; Zhao, Haihong; Roberts, Hugh J.; MacManus, Kytt. 2015. "Channel Shallowing as Mitigation of Coastal Flooding" J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 3, no. 3: 654-673. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse3030654

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop