Next Article in Journal
AI-Based Optimization Techniques for Hydrodynamic and Structural Design in Ships: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Performance Analysis of an Ice-Based Buoy Operating from the Packed Ice Zone to the Marginal Ice Zone with an Imaging System
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Upper Ocean Response to Typhoon Khanun in the South China Sea from Multiple-Satellite Observations and Numerical Simulations

1
College of Oceanography and Meteorology, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang 524088, China
2
College of Electronics and Information Engineering, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang 524088, China
3
Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhanjiang), South China Sea Resources Big Data Center, Zhanjiang 524025, China
4
Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center for Marine Remote Sensing and Information Technology, Zhanjiang 524088, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2025, 13(9), 1718; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13091718
Submission received: 23 July 2025 / Revised: 28 August 2025 / Accepted: 29 August 2025 / Published: 5 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Physical Oceanography)

Abstract

This study examines the upper-ocean response to Typhoon Khanun, which traversed the northern South China Sea in October 2017, by integrating multi-satellite observations with numerical simulations from the Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS). For the ROMS simulations, an Arakawa C-grid was adopted with a 4-km horizontal resolution and 40 vertical terrain-following σ -layers, covering the domain of 105° E to 119° E and 15° N to 23° N. Typhoons significantly influence ocean dynamics, altering sea surface temperature (SST), sea surface salinity (SSS), and ocean currents, thereby modulating air–sea exchange processes and marine ecosystem dynamics. High-resolution satellite datasets, including GHRSSST for SST, SMAP for SSS, GPM IMERG for precipitation, and GLORYS12 for sea surface height, were combined with ROMS simulations configured at a 4-km horizontal resolution with 40 vertical layers to analyze ocean changes from 11 to 18 October 2017. The results show that Typhoon Khanun induced substantial SST cooling, with ROMS simulations indicating a maximum decrease of 1.94 °C and satellite data confirming up to 1.5 °C, primarily on the right side of the storm track due to wind-driven upwelling and vertical mixing. SSS exhibited a complex response: nearshore regions, such as the Beibu Gulf, experienced freshening of up to 0.1 psu driven by intense rainfall, while the right side of the storm track showed a salinity increase of 0.6 psu due to upwelling of saltier deep water. Ocean currents intensified significantly, reaching speeds of 0.5–1 m/s near coastal areas, with pronounced vertical mixing in the upper 70 m driven by Ekman pumping and wave-current interactions. By effectively capturing typhoon-induced oceanic responses, the integration of satellite data and the ROMS model enhances understanding of typhoon–ocean interaction mechanisms, providing a scientific basis for risk assessment and disaster management in typhoon-prone regions. Future research should focus on refining model parameterizations and advancing data assimilation techniques to improve predictions of typhoon–ocean interactions, providing valuable insights for disaster preparedness and environmental management in typhoon-prone regions.

1. Introduction

The Northwest Pacific and South China Sea (The territorial scope of the South China Sea covers the maritime areas within the U-shaped Nine-Dash Line. It includes the Xisha, Nansha, and Zhongsha Islands under the jurisdiction of Sansha City, Hainan Province, located between 03°35′ N and 17°08′ N. Figure 1 shows the main area traversed by the typhoon, including a part of the South China Sea area.) are primary regions for tropical cyclone formation, significantly influencing regional climate dynamics and moisture transport [1]. As key pathways for monsoonal flows, these regions play a vital role in global climate regulation [2]. Typhoons, known for their high destructive potential, frequently cause heavy precipitation, storm surges, and coastal flooding, profoundly affecting ecosystems, economic activities, and societal stability [3]. In China, Guangdong Province experiences an average of 3.6 typhoon landfalls annually, making it one of the most typhoon-affected regions globally [4]. Recent studies indicate that global warming, by increasing sea surface temperatures (SST), may enhance typhoon frequency and intensity, prolonging their lifecycles and exacerbating ecological and socio-economic impacts in coastal areas [5]. Accurate characterization of typhoon–ocean interactions is essential for improving forecast accuracy and evaluating long-term ecological changes in the context of climate change [6].
Typhoons trigger complex upper-ocean responses through physical processes such as Ekman transport, upwelling, and downwelling, which are influenced by the storm’s trajectory relative to coastlines [7]. These processes significantly alter sea surface temperature (SST), sea surface salinity (SSS), and ocean current structures [8]. For instance, typhoon-induced vertical mixing and upwelling can reduce SST by several degrees Celsius, particularly on the right side of the storm track, thereby reducing heat and moisture fluxes to the atmosphere and weakening storm intensity [9]. Similarly, heavy rainfall and vertical mixing modify SSS distributions, creating asymmetric spatial patterns—freshening on the left side due to precipitation and salinification on the right due to upwelled saline water [10]. These physical changes also drive ecological responses, such as nutrient upwelling, which promotes phytoplankton blooms, enhancing marine productivity and carbon sequestration [11,12,13]. The complexity of these interactions highlights the need for advanced observational and modeling tools to accurately capture their spatial and temporal variability [14].
The Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS), coupled with satellite remote sensing, provides a robust framework for studying typhoon–ocean interactions. Satellite remote sensing delivers high spatiotemporal resolution data for parameters such as sea surface temperature (SST), sea surface salinity (SSS), and surface wind fields [15]. However, its effectiveness is limited by cloud cover and atmospheric interference during extreme weather, which obstructs direct observation of vertical ocean structures [16]. In contrast, ROMS, a three-dimensional, free-surface, hydrostatic ocean model, simulates critical processes such as mixed-layer deepening, upwelling, and regional current dynamics at high resolution, effectively compensating for these observational gaps [17]. For example, the Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere-Wave-Sediment Transport (COAWST) system, integrating ROMS with the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model and the Simulating Waves Nearshore (SWAN) model, was used to simulate Typhoon Kalmaegi (2014) in the South China Sea, accurately reproducing an SST cooling of approximately 3 °C, driven by vertical mixing and horizontal advection, which improved air–sea feedback and typhoon intensity forecasts [18]. Similarly, studies on Typhoon Krosa in the Northwest Pacific combined ROMS with satellite remote sensing and Argo float data, revealing enhanced cyclonic eddy circulation and nutrient upwelling, which triggered a fivefold increase in chlorophyll-a concentrations and a phytoplankton bloom persisting for about two weeks, underscoring the ecological impacts of typhoons [19].
Building on this integrated approach, numerous studies have employed ROMS and satellite remote sensing to systematically analyze upper-ocean responses to typhoons. For instance, Yue et al. combined multi-sensor satellite data with ROMS simulations to study Typhoons Kalmaegi and Sarika, documenting SST reductions of up to 2 °C on the right side of storm tracks and asymmetric SSS patterns, with freshening on the left due to rainfall and salinification on the right due to upwelling [9]. Similarly, investigations of Typhoon Mala in the Bay of Bengal confirmed that ROMS effectively reproduced mixed-layer deepening and upwelling, which influenced ocean stability [20]. Guan et al. explored the role of internal tides in modulating typhoon-induced responses in the South China Sea, demonstrating enhanced vertical mixing and SST cooling, validated by satellite microwave SST observations [21]. Additionally, Wu et al. applied the COAWST system to study super Typhoon Mangkhut, analyzing spatial asymmetries in SST cooling and subsurface thermal structures, corroborated by satellite and buoy data [22]. Collectively, these studies validate the reliability of ROMS, coupled with satellite remote sensing, in simulating typhoon-driven physical processes and elucidating complex air-sea interactions [23].
This study employs ROMS to numerically simulate Typhoon Khanun (2017) and investigate its track, intensity, and upper-ocean responses in the South China Sea. Occurring in October 2017, Typhoon Khanun affected both coastal and open-ocean regions, generating strong winds and heavy precipitation that induced significant ocean dynamic changes. By simulating variations in SST, SSS, and ocean currents, this research aims to clarify the physical mechanisms driving typhoon–ocean interactions, including vertical mixing and upwelling [24]. Compared to prior studies, Typhoon Khanun presents a unique case due to its extensive spatial influence and pronounced ocean responses, offering valuable insights into typhoon behavior under diverse environmental conditions. The findings are expected to improve the accuracy of typhoon forecasts in the South China Sea, thereby enhancing disaster preparedness and mitigation strategies.
Compared with previous studies that mainly focused on individual typhoon events such as Kalmaegi or Mangkhut using either ROMS or satellite data, this study makes two key improvements. First, it investigates Typhoon Khanun (2017), a relatively underexplored case that exhibited a broad spatial impact in the northern South China Sea. Second, a higher-resolution ROMS configuration (~4 km, 40 σ -layers) is coupled with the SWAN wave model via the COAWST system, enabling a more accurate representation of typhoon processes.
The subsequent sections are structured as follows: Section 2 describes the datasets, including satellite remote sensing and reanalysis products, and the ROMS simulation methodology; Section 3 presents the simulated ocean responses induced by Typhoon Khanun and discusses their driving mechanisms; Section 4 summarizes the key findings and their implications for typhoon and oceanographic research.

2. Dataset and Methodology

2.1. Typhoon Kanu

Typhoon data were sourced from the China Meteorological Administration (CMA) Tropical Cyclone Data Center (data available at https://tcdata.typhoon.org.cn/) (accessed on 20 September 2024)  [25,26]. Severe Typhoon Khanun, the 20th tropical cyclone of 2017, formed as a tropical depression over the western Pacific east of the Philippines at 12:00 UTC on 11 October 2017. It intensified while moving westward, later shifting northwestward, and reached typhoon status by 22:00 UTC on 14 October. By 06:00 UTC on 15 October, Khanun attained severe typhoon status with a maximum wind speed of 42 m/s. It made landfall near Xuwen, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, on 16 October, then moved southwestward, rapidly weakening and dissipating over the Beibu Gulf. As shown in Figure 1, the storm’s trajectory is illustrated.

2.2. Sea Surface Temperature (SST)

Daily sea surface temperature (SST) data from the NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI) GHRSSST Level 4 global optimal interpolation dataset were used to validate model simulations and analyze temperature variations during Typhoon Khanun (data available at https://podaac.jpl.nasa.gov/ (accessed on 2 October 2024)). This dataset integrates satellite observations (AVHRR) with in-situ measurements, offering a spatial resolution of 0.05°(approximately 5.5 km in the South China Sea) and temporal coverage from January 2016 to the present day. Sea surface height (SSH) data were obtained from the GLORYS12 reanalysis product, provided by the Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Service, with a 1/12° resolution and coverage from 1993 onward. GLORYS12 incorporates ECMWF ERA5 atmospheric reanalysis data and assimilates satellite SST, SSH, sea ice concentration, and in situ temperature and salinity profiles using an extended Kalman filter, ensuring robust representation of ocean dynamics.

2.3. Sea Surface Salinity (SSS)

Sea surface salinity (SSS) data were derived from NASA’s SMAP Level 3 8-day running mean product, processed by Remote Sensing Systems (RSS), with a 0.25° grid resolution and global coverage every three days (data available at https://www.remss.com (accessed on 3 October 2024)). SMAP data undergo smoothing, rain filtering, and radio frequency interference (RFI) removal to ensure quality, with effective resolutions of 40 km or 70 km. Atmospheric forcing data were obtained from ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis, providing hourly estimates at a 0.25° resolution (approximately 31 km) from January 1940, including SST, 10 m wind speed, and shortwave radiation. Initial and boundary conditions were provided by HYCOM reanalysis data at a 1/12° resolution, covering January 1994 to the present day, incorporating temperature, salinity, and velocity fields to support accurate model initialization.

2.4. Rainfall Rate

Precipitation data were sourced from the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals (IMERG) half-hourly product, which integrates data from multiple satellites (GMI, TMI, SSMIS, AMSR2, MHS) at a 0.1° resolution, providing global precipitation estimates every three hours (data available at https://disc.gsfc.nasa.gov/ (accessed on 8 October 2024)). IMERG employs a quasi-Lagrangian framework to interpolate microwave data, enhancing accuracy by reducing reliance on infrared estimates and capturing precipitation system evolution.

2.5. Model Configuration

The Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS) (http://www.myroms.org (accessed on 1 June 2023)) was utilized to simulate spatiotemporal variations in temperature and circulation during Typhoon Khanun [27,28]. The model domain spans 105° E to 119° E and 15° N to 23° N, encompassing the northern South China Sea. The horizontal grid uses an Arakawa C-grid with a resolution of approximately 4 km (350 × 200 grid points, as specified by Lm = 350, Mm = 200 in the configuration), and the vertical grid employs 40 terrain-following σ -layers to enhance resolution in specific layers. This setup provides a finer resolution than typical typhoon studies, allowing better capture of fine-scale processes such as localized upwelling and coastal mixing. Bathymetry data were sourced from the global topography dataset compiled by the International Hydrographic Organization and Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission, with shoreline data from NOAA’s GSHHS high-resolution dataset. To ensure model stability, a Laplacian filter was applied to smooth bathymetry, with the maximum roughness factor set to 0.2.
Initial conditions for temperature, salinity, and velocity fields were derived from HYCOM data [29]. Open boundary conditions were applied at the eastern, southern, western, and northern boundaries, using Chapman conditions for sea level and Flather conditions for two-dimensional velocities. Tidal forcing incorporated eight tidal constituents (M2, S2, N2, K2, K1, O1, P1, Q1) from the TPXO8 global tide model. Wind stress, calculated from ERA5 10 m wind fields (0.25° resolution, hourly), served as the external forcing for storm surge simulation in a one-way coupling mode. Additional atmospheric forcing variables included 10 m wind vectors, shortwave and longwave radiation, 2 m air temperature, precipitation rate, and humidity. The minimum water depth was set to 5 m, and the simulation covered 11–18 October 2017. HYCOM data (1/12° resolution) provided initial and lateral boundary conditions but were insufficient for resolving fine-scale typhoon-induced processes due to their coarser resolution.
The SWAN model configuration for Typhoon Khanun forms a central node, comprising the third-generation shallow water spectral wave model that handles wave propagation, refraction due to currents and depth, wind generation, dissipation (white-capping, bottom friction, depth-induced breaking), and nonlinear wave–wave interactions [30]. This node is connected to a grid setup (105° E–119° E, 15° N–23° N) with a 351 × 201 curvilinear orthogonal structure at 4 km resolution, linked to 24 frequencies (0.04–1 Hz) and 36 directional bands. The SWAN node outputs significant wave height, mean wave direction, surface peak wave period, mean wavelength, wave energy dissipation, and percent of breaking waves, channeling these into ROMS for bottom shear stress, vortex forces, and wave mixing calculations.
The COAWST system acts as a central hub, orchestrating data exchange between ROMS and SWAN, synchronized every 3600 s via the Model Coupling Toolkit (MCT) [31,32]. From SWAN → ROMS, a flow of wave parameters—significant wave height, wave direction, wave period, wave energy dissipation, and wave-induced stresses—moves hourly, influencing ROMS’s simulation of surface mixing and wave-current interactions. Conversely, ROMS → SWAN feeds surface currents (U, V), bathymetry, and sea surface height (SSH) hourly, shaping wave propagation paths, breaking locations, and dissipation intensity. The hub loads interpolation weight files, executes variable mapping and transmission, ensuring both models advance in lockstep, maintaining spatiotemporal consistency throughout the Typhoon Khanun simulation.

2.6. Methods

To quantitatively evaluate the consistency between model simulations and observational data, three statistical metrics were employed: correlation coefficient (R), mean absolute bias (MAB), and root mean square error (RMSE). The correlation coefficient (R), calculated using the Pearson correlation coefficient, quantifies the linear relationship between simulated and observed values, reflecting the model’s ability to capture spatiotemporal trends.
R = i = 1 n ( S i S ¯ ) ( O i O ¯ ) i = 1 n ( S i S ¯ ) 2 i = 1 n ( O i O ¯ ) 2
where S i and O i are simulated and observed values, respectively, S ¯ and O ¯ are their means, and n is the number of grid points within the study domain at a given time step.
The mean absolute bias (MAB) measures systematic bias by averaging absolute errors:
MAB = 1 n i = 1 n | S i O i | .
The root mean square error (RMSE) evaluates overall error, emphasizing larger deviations, and is effective for assessing model performance in extreme or anomalous conditions:
RMSE = 1 n i = 1 n ( S i O i ) 2 .
Here, the summations are carried out over all spatial grid points at each fixed time step, yielding one set of metrics (R, MAB, RMSE) that characterizes the model performance for the whole study area at that particular time.
The temperature budget equation, used to analyze temperature variations, is expressed as
T t = ( u T ) x + ( v T ) y + ( w T ) z + z A h T z + D r ,
where the left-hand side represents the temperature tendency, and the right-hand side includes horizontal and vertical advection, vertical diffusion, and a residual term ( D r ), which was neglected due to weak horizontal temperature gradients. The boundary conditions are
A h T z z = 0 = Q net ρ 0 C p , A h T z z = h = 0 ,
where T is water temperature, A h is the vertical diffusion coefficient, u, v, and w are velocity components in the eastward, northward, and upward directions, respectively, x, y, and z are spatial coordinates, Q net is the net surface heat flux, ρ 0 = 1025 kg m 3 is the reference seawater density, C p is the specific heat capacity, and h is the water depth.
Ekman pumping refers to the convergence or divergence of air at the top of the Ekman layer due to turbulent friction. The Ekman pumping effect enhances the exchange of momentum, heat, and water vapor between the free atmosphere and the boundary layer. The Ekman pumping velocity (EPV) was calculated from the wind stress and Coriolis parameter using the Climate Data Toolbox for MATLAB (version R2024a). The formula is shown in Equation (6):
W E k = × τ ρ f ,
where W E k represents the EPV (m/s); τ is the surface wind stress (N m−2); ρ is the seawater density (1025 kg m−3); and f is the Coriolis parameter ( f = 2 Ω sin θ , where Ω is the Earth’s angular velocity and θ is latitude).
The surface wind stress was calculated following:
τ = [ τ x , τ y ] = ρ a C D | V | [ u , v ] ,
where τ x and τ y are the east–west and north–south components of wind stress (N m−2); ρ a is the air density near the sea surface (kg m−3); C D is the drag coefficient (dimensionless); | V | is the wind speed magnitude (m s−1); and u and v are the east–west and north–south wind speed components (m s−1).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Model Validation

Model performance was evaluated using three statistical metrics: correlation coefficient (R), mean absolute bias (MAB), and root mean square error (RMSE). The Pearson correlation coefficient (R) measures the linear relationship between simulated and observed values, indicating the model’s ability to capture spatiotemporal trends.
The ROMS model was used to simulate sea surface temperature (SST) and sea surface height (SSH) variations induced by Typhoon Khanun (October 2017) in the South China Sea, validated against GHRSSST, Jason-2/3, and HY-2 satellite observations (see Figure 2 and Figure 3). The simulations revealed significant SST cooling on the right side of the storm track (approximately 2.0 °C, see Figure 2), closely aligning with satellite observations ( R = 0.822 , RMSE = 0.424 °C, MAB = 0.370 °C; Table 1). However, SST cooling was slightly underestimated during the typhoon’s peak intensity on 15 October (RMSE = 0.641 °C; Table 1).
SSH simulations showed higher consistency with observations ( R = 0.78 , RMSE = 0.076 m, MAB = 0.076 m; Figure 3 and Table 1), with optimal performance during the peak intensity ( R = 0.885 on 15 October). Wind-driven vertical mixing and upwelling primarily drove SST cooling, while wave–current interactions modulated SSH variations, with the model improving accuracy by accounting for surface roughness.
Although the model effectively reproduced spatiotemporal variations in SST and SSH, with SSH simulations outperforming SST, discrepancies during peak SST cooling and SSH dissipation phases suggest the need for refined vertical mixing parameterization and higher-resolution bathymetry and tidal data.

3.2. Wind Variation During the Movement of Typhoon Khanun

Khanun formed in the northwest Pacific Ocean and dissipated over the South China Sea. It had the characteristics of “strong landing intensity, long land retention time, and wide impact area,” which caused serious casualties and economic losses to many coastal provinces of China. Additionally, Figure 4 and Figure 5 depict the 6-hourly sea surface wind field and pressure distribution in the South China Sea during Khanun’s passage, derived from ERA5 reanalysis data, with black arrows representing 10 m wind speed vectors and colors indicating sea level pressure.
Based on the hourly wind speed data at a 10 m height above the sea surface, the Ekman Pumping Velocity (EPV) and its spatial distribution were computed using MATLAB through Equations (6) and (7). Figure 6 illustrates the EPV variations across the region during the passage of Typhoon Khanun. A positive EPV signifies upward movement, while a negative value indicates downward motion, as depicted in the images. The EPV is notably prominent over the ocean near the typhoon’s center. As the typhoon approached the coastline, the EPV became more evident along the coastal areas to the right of the storm, influenced by the typhoon’s wind patterns.
The strong winds and low-pressure centers associated with Typhoon Khanun were primary drivers of enhanced ocean mixing, significantly altering the upper ocean’s dynamic response. The high wind speeds near the typhoon’s center, as derived from ERA5 reanalysis data, generated substantial wind stress on the ocean surface, deepening the mixed layer through intense vertical mixing. Specifically, within the regional domain bounded by latitudes 19° N–20° N and longitudes 111° E–112° E, the density-based ocean mixed layer thickness exhibited a notable deepening trend during the typhoon influence period: approximately 28 m on the 11th and approximately 46 m on the 15th. This process facilitated the convergence and divergence of surface waters, driving key ocean dynamic processes such as upwelling and downwelling. The spatial distribution of Ekman Pumping Velocity (EPV), calculated using Equations (6) and (7), revealed pronounced vertical motion in regions of intense atmospheric forcing, particularly near the typhoon’s core, where high positive EPV values indicated strong upward Ekman suction [22]. As Khanun approached the coastline, the EPV intensified along the coastal areas, where the proximity of the coastline enhanced asymmetry in the wind stress field. This effect was particularly evident to the right of the storm’s path near the coast, whereas over the open ocean the EPV distribution was more spatially symmetric, with less pronounced right–left differences. These patterns underscore the critical role of wind stress in modulating upper ocean responses during the typhoon’s transit.
The temporal evolution of Ekman Pumping Velocity (EPV), as presented in Table 2, elucidates the dynamic interplay between Typhoon Khanun’s wind field and oceanic responses. EPV values, derived from 10 m wind speed data using MATLAB through Equations (6) and (7), scale with the square of wind speed, underscoring the direct relationship between atmospheric forcing and oceanic vertical motion. On 13 October 2017 at 18:00, the EPV reached a maximum of 1.473314 × 10 4 m/s, a minimum of 8.098580 × 10 5 m/s, and a mean of 1.360476 × 10 6 m/s, indicating moderate vertical motion during the typhoon’s early passage over the South China Sea. As the typhoon intensified, the maximum EPV increased to 2.617117 × 10 4 m/s on 14 October 2017 at 12:00, with a minimum of 1.143828 × 10 4 m/s and a mean of 6.691335 × 10 6 m/s, reflecting heightened atmospheric forcing. By 15 October 2017, the EPV peaked at 00:00 with a maximum of 3.007686 × 10 4 m/s, followed by 3.080665 × 10 4 m/s at 06:00, and reached 3.266482 × 10 4 m/s at 12:00, with corresponding minima of 1.425602 × 10 4 m/s, 1.430707 × 10 4 m/s, and 1.379800 × 10 4 m/s, and means of 6.131098 × 10 6 m/s, 5.253523 × 10 6 m/s, and 3.241878 × 10 6 m/s, respectively. These fluctuations highlight the strong winds and low-pressure centers of Typhoon Khanun as key drivers of enhanced ocean mixing, with high EPV values near the storm’s center signifying intense upward Ekman suction, while negative values indicated downward motion in adjacent areas. This dynamic response, driven by the typhoon’s atmospheric forcing, significantly influenced upper ocean mixing processes, potentially redistributing heat and nutrients. Such changes may enhance regional marine productivity by upwelling nutrient-rich deep waters or alter local weather patterns through modifications in sea surface temperature, warranting further investigation into the long-term ecological and climatic impacts [22].

3.3. SST Changes During Typhoon Khanun’s Passage

Typhoon Khanun significantly altered sea surface temperature (SST) through wind-driven vertical mixing and upwelling, resulting in pronounced cooling across the northern South China Sea [33]. This study evaluated the spatial extent and magnitude of SST cooling by comparing GHRSSST global operational SST data with ROMS simulations [34]. GHRSSST observations revealed a maximum cooling of 1.50 °C along the storm track, while ROMS simulations in Figure 7 indicated a slightly greater cooling of 1.94 °C. The most significant cooling occurred ahead of the storm track and in coastal regions, where the proximity to land and strong winds enhanced vertical mixing and upwelling, bringing colder deep water to the surface [35]. While a rightward bias in mixing is often reported for tropical cyclones in the open ocean, in this case the coastal influence played a dominant role in shaping the cooling pattern. The higher variability in ROMS cooling patterns, compared to the more uniform GHRSSST data, likely stems from the model’s higher resolution, which better captures localized upwelling events.
Local SST responses were examined at 25 points along Typhoon Khanun’s track, spanning its evolution from a tropical depression to a severe typhoon and its subsequent weakening. GHRSSST data indicated cooling ranging from 0.53 °C to 1.50 °C, with the maximum at point 23 (110.70° E, 20.70° N) during the severe tropical storm phase, likely due to enhanced mixing near land. Cooling was more pronounced during the tropical storm and severe tropical storm phases than during the typhoon phase, possibly influenced by variations in storm translation speed or mixed-layer depth. In contrast, ROMS simulations showed cooling ranging from 0.07 °C to 1.94 °C, reflecting stronger mixing in high-wind regions. The spatial cooling pattern was concentrated in coastal areas and ahead of the storm track, reflecting the combined effects of storm forcing and coastal modulation, rather than a purely rightward mixing bias. The pronounced local cooling in ROMS suggests effective parameterization of wind-driven mixing, while the smoother GHRSSST response may result from satellite data averaging.
Ocean heat content (OHC) is a critical metric of upper-ocean thermal energy, directly influencing tropical cyclone intensity and duration. OHC quantifies the heat stored above the 26 °C isotherm, providing energy for typhoon intensification, while its reduction may weaken storms. The high-resolution ROMS configuration captures fine-scale regional responses, offering insights into heat redistribution processes.
OHC was calculated using the formula
OHC = ρ 0 C p z = z 26 z = 0 ( T 26 ) d z × 10 7
where ρ 0 = 1025 kg / m 3 is the reference seawater density, C p = 3985 J / ( kg · ° C ) is the specific heat capacity, T is the temperature profile, and z 26 is the 26 °C isotherm depth, with a scaling factor of 10 7 to convert units to MJ/cm2. Before Khanun’s passage, the study region exhibited an average OHC of 49.08 MJ/cm2. Post-passage, the average OHC decreased to 37.94 MJ/cm2, a loss of 11.14 MJ/cm2.
The OHC reduction was primarily driven by typhoon-induced vertical mixing and upwelling. The strong winds of Typhoon Khanun triggered Ekman pumping, lifting colder, nutrient-rich deep water to the surface. The wave–current coupled model revealed that wave-induced mixing, including wave breaking and Stokes drift, contributed an additional 0.3–0.5 °C to cooling, underscoring the role of waves in heat redistribution [36,37]. The shallow autumn thermocline in the northern South China Sea facilitated cold-water entrainment, amplifying OHC loss. Recent comprehensive analyses corroborate that, on the short timescale of storm passage (hours–days), vertical redistribution (turbulent entrainment and upwelling) provides the dominant contribution to rapid SST cooling, whereas atmospheric enthalpy fluxes typically play a secondary role in the initial cooling but can be important for the subsequent evolution of the cold wake [38]. This high-resolution model provides a detailed regional analysis of OHC changes. For instance, reported significant OHC reductions in the Gulf of Mexico during Hurricane Gilbert (1988), attributed to vertical mixing and upwelling, aligning with our findings [39]. OHC reductions can weaken typhoon energy supply, potentially reducing intensity.

3.4. Sea Surface Salinity Response

This study utilized NASA’s Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) satellite data and the Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS) to investigate sea surface salinity (SSS) reductions in the northern South China Sea during Typhoon Khanun, with Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals (IMERG) rainfall data used to analyze the driving mechanisms. SMAP daily salinity data, complemented by high-resolution ROMS simulations, effectively captured spatiotemporal SSS variations, revealing a significant typhoon-induced freshening effect. GPM IMERG half-hourly rainfall data, derived from a multi-satellite retrieval algorithm, provided detailed precipitation distributions, enabling a robust analysis of the relationship between rainfall and SSS changes [40,41]. The strong winds and low-pressure centers of Typhoon Khanun, as derived from ERA5 reanalysis data, drove enhanced ocean mixing, with high Ekman Pumping Velocity (EPV) indicating areas of intense atmospheric forcing that influenced upper ocean responses, including salinity distribution. Initial SMAP (Figure 8) observations suggested a notable SSS reduction during the typhoon; however, due to the satellite’s coarser resolution, it struggled to accurately capture fine-scale variations, particularly in nearshore regions. Thus, ROMS simulations (Figure 9) revealed a more precise SSS reduction of up to 0.1 psu, most notably in the Leizhou Peninsula and Beibu Gulf, where GPM data (Figure 10) confirmed heavy rainfall as a primary driver. Discrepancies between SMAP and ROMS were attributed to resolution differences, with SMAP’s limitations highlighting the need for high-resolution modeling to elucidate localized salinity dynamics. This section elucidates the dynamic characteristics of SSS during Typhoon Khanun and its linkage to rainfall and wind-driven mixing through integrated SMAP, ROMS, and GPM data analysis.
SMAP and ROMS data revealed distinct spatiotemporal SSS variations during Typhoon Khanun, categorized into three phases: pre-typhoon, typhoon, and post-typhoon. Before 11 October (pre-typhoon), SSS in the northern South China Sea was stable, averaging 33 psu, indicative of a uniform autumn oceanic background. During the typhoon (12–16 October), SSS decreased significantly in high-rainfall areas, with the largest reductions observed in nearshore regions, particularly the Beibu Gulf, coinciding with heavy rainfall and landfall on October 16. ROMS simulations, with higher spatial resolution, captured finer-scale SSS reductions in the Beibu Gulf compared to SMAP, highlighting resolution-driven discrepancies. A low-salinity zone emerged in the Beibu Gulf between 14 and 15 October, closely aligned with peak rainfall and high EPV values, which indicated intense wind-driven mixing near the typhoon’s core. Post-typhoon (after 16 October), SSS gradually recovered, though nearshore areas exhibited slower recovery, likely due to regional oceanic dynamics, such as coastal currents, and freshwater retention. The strong winds and low-pressure centers, as evidenced by ERA5 data, amplified upper ocean mixing, contributing to the observed SSS reductions alongside rainfall. These findings suggest that typhoon-induced freshening was most pronounced in coastal regions, modulated by both atmospheric forcing and oceanic processes.
The SSS reduction was primarily driven by rainfall-induced freshening, modulated by mixed-layer dynamics, upwelling, and wave action, with significant contributions from wind-driven mixing. In shallow nearshore regions like the Beibu Gulf, limited vertical mixing caused rainfall-derived freshwater to remain in the surface layer, forming pronounced low-salinity zones, as captured by both SMAP and ROMS. Strong winds and low-pressure centers, generating high EPV values (e.g., 3.266482 × 10 4 m/s on 15 October at 12:00), deepened the mixed-layer depth through intense turbulent mixing, facilitating the downward transport of freshwater and amplifying the freshening effect vertically. However, along the outer edges of the typhoon path, Ekman pumping induced upwelling, bringing saltier deep water to the surface, partially counteracting the freshening, as observed in ROMS simulations. Discrepancies between SMAP and ROMS salinity data were attributed to resolution differences, with ROMS resolving finer-scale features, such as localized upwelling, that SMAP’s coarser resolution could not capture. Additionally, wave breaking and wind stress in nearshore areas intensified surface turbulence, promoting horizontal freshwater diffusion and enhancing low-salinity characteristics in the Beibu Gulf. These combined processes underscore the critical role of wind-driven mixing and rainfall in shaping SSS distributions during Typhoon Khanun.
In conclusion, GPM IMERG data provided detailed insights into the spatiotemporal distribution of rainfall and its relationship with SSS reduction during Typhoon Khanun, supported by SMAP and ROMS comparisons. Heavy rainfall occurred primarily between 13 and 15 October, aligning closely with the period of significant SSS decline, particularly in the Beibu Gulf, where peak rainfall intensity formed a prominent high-rainfall belt. A strong spatial correlation was observed between low-salinity zones and high-rainfall areas, as evidenced by SMAP and ROMS data, confirming freshwater input from heavy rainfall as the primary driver of SSS reduction. ROMS simulations further revealed finer-scale salinity gradients in nearshore regions compared to SMAP, highlighting the impact of resolution differences on capturing localized freshening. The intense atmospheric forcing, indicated by high EPV values near the typhoon’s core, enhanced upper ocean mixing, amplifying the effects of rainfall-induced freshening. This synergistic interaction between wind-driven mixing and freshwater input likely influenced regional marine ecosystems by redistributing nutrients, potentially stimulating phytoplankton growth in nutrient-rich upwelled waters. Additionally, SSS and sea surface temperature (SST) changes may have altered local climate patterns by modifying evaporation and heat fluxes, suggesting broader implications for regional climate dynamics. Further studies are needed to quantify the long-term ecological and climatic impacts of these typhoon-induced processes [41].

3.5. Sea Current Response

The oceanographic impacts of Typhoon Khanun in October 2017 in the northern South China Sea were simulated using the Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS), with current speed distributions, vertical velocity profiles, and sea surface salinity (SSS) changes providing comprehensive insights. Before the typhoon, background circulation, driven by monsoons and seabed topography, exhibited stable alongshore flows with uniform current speeds of 0.1–0.3 m/s near Hainan Island and the Guangdong coast (Figure 11). During the typhoon, current fields intensified significantly, with speeds near the Guangdong coast rising to 0.5–0.7 m/s and flow directions strengthening, reflecting robust water mass dynamics driven by typhoon winds and wave activity. At the typhoon’s peak intensity on 15 October 2017, current speeds southeast of Hainan Island reached a maximum of approximately 1 m/s, underscoring the storm’s peak disturbance.
The Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS) revealed vertical velocity (w) fields indicating pronounced upwelling regions (Figure 12), particularly on the right side of the storm track, where strong winds and low-pressure centers drove enhanced ocean mixing [4]. From 11 to 15 October 2017, a transect perpendicular to Typhoon Khanun’s track in the northern South China Sea revealed significant upper-ocean cooling (0–70 m) and SST variations, driven by wind-induced upwelling, enhanced turbulent mixing, and freshwater input from rainfall. ROMS-derived vertical velocity profiles indicated pronounced upward and downward motions, confirming active vertical dynamics within the upper 70 m, with upwelling bringing colder, nutrient-rich deep water to the surface. We constructed a temperature profile perpendicular to the typhoon track (Figure 13 and Figure 14); Temperature profiles from ROMS showed substantial subsurface cooling and homogenization of the thermal structure, particularly in upwelling regions on the right side of the storm track, where cyclonic wind stress vorticity was strongest. The strongest cooling peaked 2–7 days post-passage, consistent with observations on 18 October. Upward motions facilitated cold-water upwelling, while downward motions likely represented compensatory flows or near-inertial oscillations, displacing isopycnals and the thermocline. The shallow autumn thermocline in the northern South China Sea amplified cold-water entrainment and freshwater retention, intensifying both cooling and freshening effects.
Significant sea surface temperature (SST) cooling and SSS reduction during Typhoon Khanun’s passage resulted from the synergistic effects of Ekman pumping, wave-induced mixing, and rainfall-induced freshening, all amplified by the typhoon’s strong wind field and low-pressure centers. Ekman pumping, driven by cyclonic wind stress and quantified by high Ekman Pumping Velocity (EPV) values (e.g., 3.266482 × 10 4 m/s on 15 October at 12:00), promoted upwelling of colder deep water, particularly on the right side of the storm track where wind stress aligned with Coriolis forcing [22]. ROMS-derived vertical velocity fields confirmed these upwelling regions, with temperature profiles indicating subsurface cooling and enhanced mixing within the upper 70 m. The strong winds and wave action deepened the mixed layer, leading to cold-water entrainment and freshwater subduction, both of which contributed to enhanced SST cooling. These processes likely influenced regional marine ecosystems by redistributing nutrients, potentially stimulating phytoplankton growth.
During Typhoon Khanun’s passage, intense winds on the right side of the storm track generated significantly higher Ekman transport velocities compared to the left, driving pronounced Ekman pumping and upwelling in the northern South China Sea. ROMS simulations indicated vertical velocities peaking in upwelling regions beneath and slightly to the right of the typhoon center, transporting colder, nutrient-rich deep water to the surface, which contributed to SST cooling. The upwelling, most prominent on the right due to enhanced cyclonic wind stress vorticity in the Northern Hemisphere, intensified upper-ocean mixing, homogenizing the thermal and salinity structures. The synergistic effects of wind-driven Ekman processes and rainfall-induced freshening amplified the observed oceanic responses, with high EPV values indicating intense atmospheric forcing that deepened the mixed layer and enhanced nutrient upwelling. These dynamics likely stimulated phytoplankton productivity, potentially impacting regional fisheries, while SST changes may have altered local evaporation and heat fluxes, influencing regional weather patterns.

4. Conclusions

This study investigates the atmospheric and oceanic responses to Typhoon Khanun in the northern South China Sea, revealing that wind-induced mixing, upwelling, and localized precipitation were pivotal drivers of significant sea surface temperature (SST) cooling and salinity (SSS) reduction. Strong winds and low-pressure centers intensified mixing, leading to SST cooling of up to 2 °C, with spatially heterogeneous responses along the typhoon’s path. The most pronounced cooling occurred near the coastline, where bathymetric constraints amplified mixing and upwelling. Nevertheless, in certain offshore regions (e.g., 20–21° N, 115–116° E), ROMS simulations also revealed enhanced cooling on the right side of the track, consistent with the classical rightward bias of tropical cyclone–ocean interactions. This suggests that the observed asymmetry in Typhoon Khanun was shaped by both coastal modulation and intrinsic rightward enhancement, with coastal effects playing the dominant role in nearshore areas. The Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS) simulated vertical velocity (w) fields indicated peak upwelling rates of approximately 3.266482 × 10 4 m/s on 15 October 2017, corroborated by vertical temperature profiles that confirmed the upwelling of colder, nutrient-rich deep water to the surface, directly contributing to SST cooling. Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) IMERG data recorded concentrated rainfall between 13 and 15 October, correlating with SSS reductions of up to 0.1 psu, as observed by NASA’s Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) and ROMS data, especially in nearshore regions like the Beibu Gulf. The analysis of the ocean boundary layer revealed inertial oscillations with a period of approximately 1 day at 0–75 m depth, enhancing turbulent mixing on the right side of the track and amplifying SST cooling. Furthermore, the reduced SST influenced atmospheric energy exchange, with a 1–3 °C SST drop in the typhoon inner-core region decreasing heat flux and increasing central pressure by an estimated 9 hPa. The spatial distribution of wind speed and heat flux showed consistency, though heat flux exhibited greater sensitivity to SST variations, underscoring the critical role of ocean–atmosphere interactions. ROMS simulations demonstrated high alignment with SMAP SST and CMEMS sea surface height (SSH) data, validating the model’s accuracy in capturing typhoon-induced thermal and dynamic processes.
This research advances the understanding of typhoon–ocean interactions by integrating satellite remote sensing (SMAP, GPM) with high-resolution numerical modeling (ROMS, CMEMS), providing a comprehensive analysis of Typhoon Khanun’s impact on the thermal, salinity, and dynamic structures of the northern South China Sea. Unlike many earlier typhoon studies that employed coarser grids or uncoupled models, this work demonstrates the benefits of a 4 km horizontal grid with 40 σ -layers, explicit tidal forcing, and online ROMS–SWAN coupling. These advances enabled a more realistic representation of wave–current interactions, vertical mixing, and coastal modulation, which were crucial to reproducing the observed SST/SSS responses during Typhoon Khanun. The study refines the theoretical framework of typhoon–ocean coupling, particularly the synergistic effects of wind-driven inertial oscillations, precipitation, and Ekman pumping, establishing a data-driven foundation for assessing the modulation of typhoon intensity and air–sea feedback mechanisms.
The findings of this study provide robust scientific support for optimizing ocean models, particularly through the precise simulation of sea surface temperature (SST) cooling and sea surface salinity (SSS) changes induced by Typhoon Khanun in the northern South China Sea. Upwelling-induced nutrient supply may stimulate phytoplankton growth, bolstering marine productivity and informing fisheries management and ecological conservation strategies in the South China Sea. The observed SST and SSS reductions, coupled with decreased heat flux and moist static energy, weakened typhoon intensity, highlighting the pivotal role of ocean–atmosphere interactions in modulating storm dynamics. These changes also influence regional climate patterns by altering sea surface heat fluxes and evaporation rates, offering valuable insights for climate research and adaptation to extreme weather events. Future research should focus on long-term data assimilation and coupled modeling to quantify the ecological, climatic, and intensity-related consequences of typhoon-induced processes, further enhancing disaster prevention and resilience strategies.

Author Contributions

D.F. and F.G. conceived the original idea of the study, suggested the topic, and contributed to the interpretation of the results; funding acquisition, D.F. and F.G. carried out satellite data analysis, numerical simulations, and prepared all of the figures. Y.L. and X.C. assisted in manuscript preparation and revision. F.G. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFC3103101), the Key Special Project for Introduced Talent Teams of the Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Grant No. GML2021GD0809), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42206187), and the Key Projects of the Guangdong Provincial Department of Education (Grant No. 2023ZDZX4009).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mei, W.; Lien, C.-C.; Lin, I.-I.; Xie, S.-P. Tropical cyclone–induced ocean response: A comparative study of the South China Sea and tropical northwest Pacific. J. Clim. 2015, 28, 5952–5968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ling, Z.; Wang, G.; Wang, C.; Fan, Z.-S. Different effects of tropical cyclones generated in the South China Sea and the northwest Pacific on the summer South China Sea circulation. J. Oceanogr. 2011, 67, 347–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kuo, Y.-C.; Lee, M.-A.; Chern, C.-S. Typhoon-induced ocean responses off the southwest coast of Taiwan. Ocean Dyn. 2014, 64, 1569–1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Xu, J. Coastal ocean response and its feedback to Typhoon Hato (2017) over the South China Sea: A numerical study. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2019, 124, 13731–13749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, H.; He, H.; Zhang, W.-Z.; Tian, D. Upper ocean response to tropical cyclones: A review. Geosci. Lett. 2021, 8, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wu, C.-C.; Tu, W.-T.; Pun, I.-F.; Lin, I.-I.; Peng, M.S. Tropical cyclone-ocean interaction in Typhoon Megi (2010)—A synergy study based on ITOP observations and atmosphere-ocean coupled model simulations. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2016, 121, 153–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pei, Y.; Zhang, R.; Chen, D. Upper ocean response to tropical cyclone wind forcing: A case study of typhoon Rammasun (2008). Sci. China Earth Sci. 2015, 58, 1623–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wu, R.; Li, C. Upper ocean response to the passage of two sequential typhoons. Deep Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. 2018, 132, 68–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yue, X.; Zhang, B.; Liu, G.; Li, X.; Zhang, H.; He, Y. Upper ocean response to typhoon Kalmaegi and Sarika in the South China Sea from multiple-satellite observations and numerical simulations. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, F.; Zhang, H.; Ming, J.; Zheng, J.; Tian, D.; Chen, D. Importance of precipitation on the upper ocean salinity response to Typhoon Kalmaegi (2014). Water 2020, 12, 614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pan, J.; Huang, L.; Devlin, A.T.; Lin, H. Quantification of typhoon-induced phytoplankton blooms using satellite multi-sensor data. Remote Sens. 2018, 10, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, T.; Zhang, S.; Chen, F.; Ma, Y.; Jiang, C.; Yu, J. Influence of sequential tropical cyclones on phytoplankton blooms in the northwestern South China Sea. J. Oceanol. Limnol. 2021, 39, 14–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Guo, S.; Zhu, X.; Ji, X.; Wang, H.; Zhang, S.; Jiang, H.; Wang, D. Oceanic and ecological response to native Typhoons Cempaka and Lupit (2021) along the northern South China Sea continental shelf: Comparison and evaluation of global and regional Operational Oceanography Forecasting Systems. Front. Mar. Sci. 2023, 10, 1175263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ji, C.; Zhang, Y.; Cheng, Q.; Tsou, J.Y. Investigating ocean surface responses to typhoons using reconstructed satellite data. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2021, 103, 102474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yue, X.; Zhang, B. Impact of satellite wind on improving simulation of the upper ocean response to tropical cyclones. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, H.; Liu, X.; Wu, R.; Liu, F.; Yu, L.; Shang, X.; Qi, Y.; Wang, Y.; Song, X.; Xie, X.; et al. Ocean response to successive typhoons Sarika and Haima (2016) based on data acquired via multiple satellites and moored array. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 2360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wu, Z.; Jiang, C.; Deng, B.; Chen, J.; Long, Y.; Qu, K.; Liu, X. Numerical investigation of Typhoon Kai-tak (1213) using a mesoscale coupled WRF-ROMS model. Ocean Eng. 2019, 175, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wu, R.; Zhang, H.; Chen, D.; Li, C.; Lin, J. Impact of Typhoon Kalmaegi (2014) on the South China Sea: Simulations using a fully coupled atmosphere-ocean-wave model. Ocean Model. 2018, 131, 132–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Guo, J.; Zhang, T.; Xu, C.; Xie, Q. Upper ocean response to typhoon Kujira (2015) in the South China Sea by multiple means of observation. J. Oceanol. Limnol. 2020, 38, 314–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ding, Y.; Yu, H.; Bao, X.; Kuang, L.; Wang, C.; Wang, W. Numerical study of the barotropic responses to a rapidly moving typhoon in the East China Sea. Ocean Dyn. 2011, 61, 1237–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Guan, S.; Liu, Z.; Song, J.; Hou, Y.; Feng, L. Upper ocean response to Super Typhoon Tembin (2012) explored using multiplatform satellites and Argo float observations. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2017, 38, 5150–5167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wu, Z.; Zou, Z.; Chen, J.; Luo, H.; Deng, B.; Jiang, C.; Lv, Z.; Zhang, H. Dynamic and thermodynamic characteristics of ocean response to super typhoon Mangkhut in the South China Sea. Front. Mar. Sci. 2025, 12, 1586377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zheng, M.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, W.; Fan, M.; Wang, H. Effects of ocean states coupling on the simulated Super Typhoon Megi (2010) in the South China Sea. Front. Mar. Sci. 2023, 10, 1105687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tang, L.; Zhan, J.-m.; Chen, Y.-z.; Li, Y.-s.; Nie, Y.-h. Typhoon process and its impact on the surface circulation in the northern South China Sea. J. Hydrodyn. 2011, 23, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ying, M.; Zhang, W.; Yu, H.; Lu, X.; Feng, J.; Fan, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Chen, D. An overview of the China Meteorological Administration tropical cyclone database. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 2014, 31, 287–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lu, X.; Yu, H.; Ying, M.; Zhao, B.; Zhang, S.; Lin, L.; Bai, L.; Wan, R. Western North Pacific tropical cyclone database created by the China Meteorological Administration. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 2021, 38, 690–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shchepetkin, A.F.; McWilliams, J.C. The regional oceanic modeling system (ROMS): A split-explicit, free-surface, topography-following-coordinate oceanic model. Ocean Model. 2005, 9, 347–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Haidvogel, D.B.; Arango, H.; Budgell, W.P.; Cornuelle, B.D.; Curchitser, E.; Di Lorenzo, E.; Fennel, K.; Geyer, W.R.; Hermann, A.J.; Lanerolle, L.; et al. Ocean forecasting in terrain-following coordinates: Formulation and skill assessment of the Regional Ocean Modeling System. J. Comput. Phys. 2008, 227, 3595–3624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chassignet, E.P.; Hurlburt, H.E.; Smedstad, O.M.; Halliwell, G.R.; Hogan, P.J.; Wallcraft, A.J.; Baraille, R.; Bleck, R. The HYCOM (hybrid coordinate ocean model) data assimilative system. J. Mar. Syst. 2007, 65, 60–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Booij, N.; Ris, R.C.; Holthuijsen, L.H. A third-generation wave model for coastal regions: 1. Model description and validation. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 1999, 104, 7649–7666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Warner, J.C.; Armstrong, B.; He, R.; Zambon, J.B. Development of a coupled ocean–atmosphere–wave–sediment transport (COAWST) modeling system. Ocean Model. 2010, 35, 230–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sun, J.; Li, J.; Ruan, Z.; Wu, K.; Li, F. Simulation study on the effect of atmosphere-ocean-wave interactions on Typhoon Rammasun (2014) in the South China Sea. J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. 2021, 212, 105490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhang, H.; Chen, D.; Zhou, L.; Liu, X.; Ding, T.; Zhou, B. Upper ocean response to typhoon Kalmaegi (2014). J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 2016, 121, 6520–6535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pan, J. A study of ocean responses to typhoon over the South China Sea by using satellite sea surface temperature data and numerical modeling. In AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts; American Geophysical Union: Washington, DC, USA, 2012; p. OS41B-1707. [Google Scholar]
  35. Pun, I.-F.; Lin, I.-I.; Lien, C.-C.; Wu, C.-C. Influence of the size of Supertyphoon Megi (2010) on SST cooling. Mon. Weather Rev. 2018, 146, 661–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tsai, Y.; Chern, C.-S.; Wang, J. Numerical study of typhoon-induced ocean thermal content variations on the northern shelf of the South China Sea. Cont. Shelf Res. 2012, 42, 64–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Han, Y.; Zuo, C.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Tao, C.; Zhang, X.; Zuo, J. Characterizing wind, wave, and Stokes drift interactions in the upper ocean during Typhoon Doksuri using the COAWST model. Front. Mar. Sci. 2025, 12, 1524724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Son, J.-H.; Heo, K.-Y.; Choi, J.-W.; Kwon, J.-I. Long-lasting upper ocean temperature responses induced by intense typhoons in mid-latitude. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 5752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Shay, L.K.; Elsberry, R.L.; Black, P.G. Vertical structure of the ocean current response to a hurricane. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 1989, 19, 649–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chen, L.; Li, Y.; Cheng, Z. An overview of research and forecasting on rainfall associated with landfalling tropical cyclones. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 2010, 27, 967–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Uddin, M.J.; Nasrin, Z.M.; Li, Y. Effects of vertical wind shear and storm motion on tropical cyclone rainfall asymmetries over the North Indian Ocean. Dyn. Atmos. Ocean. 2021, 93, 101196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The optimal track of Typhoon Khanun is from the CMA Tropical Cyclone Data Center. Colors on it indicate different intensities: yellow for a tropical depression, blue for a tropical storm, green for a severe tropical storm, orange for a typhoon, and pink for a severe typhoon.
Figure 1. The optimal track of Typhoon Khanun is from the CMA Tropical Cyclone Data Center. Colors on it indicate different intensities: yellow for a tropical depression, blue for a tropical storm, green for a severe tropical storm, orange for a typhoon, and pink for a severe typhoon.
Jmse 13 01718 g001
Figure 2. ROMS simulations and satellite observations of SST during Typhoon Khanun’s passage over the study area. (AD) Daily SST from the ROMS simulation and (EH) daily SST from satellite observations during Khanun’s passage over the study area on 11, 13, 15 and 18 October 2017.
Figure 2. ROMS simulations and satellite observations of SST during Typhoon Khanun’s passage over the study area. (AD) Daily SST from the ROMS simulation and (EH) daily SST from satellite observations during Khanun’s passage over the study area on 11, 13, 15 and 18 October 2017.
Jmse 13 01718 g002
Figure 3. ROMS simulations and satellite observations of SSH during Typhoon Khanun’s passage over the study area. (AD) Daily SSH from the ROMS simulation and (EH) daily SSH from satellite observations during Khanun’s passage over the study area on 11, 13, 15 and 18 October 2017.
Figure 3. ROMS simulations and satellite observations of SSH during Typhoon Khanun’s passage over the study area. (AD) Daily SSH from the ROMS simulation and (EH) daily SSH from satellite observations during Khanun’s passage over the study area on 11, 13, 15 and 18 October 2017.
Jmse 13 01718 g003
Figure 4. During the passage of Typhoon Khanun in October 2017, the 6-hourly wind direction, wind speed, and air pressure at 10 m above the sea surface in the South China Sea.
Figure 4. During the passage of Typhoon Khanun in October 2017, the 6-hourly wind direction, wind speed, and air pressure at 10 m above the sea surface in the South China Sea.
Jmse 13 01718 g004
Figure 5. Time series of wind speed and air pressure during Typhoon Khanun. The optimal track data of Typhoon Khanun used in this figure are from the CMA Tropical Cyclone Data Center. The wind speed and pressure in the time series represent the maximum sustained wind speed and central pressure of Typhoon Khanun at each corresponding time step, respectively.
Figure 5. Time series of wind speed and air pressure during Typhoon Khanun. The optimal track data of Typhoon Khanun used in this figure are from the CMA Tropical Cyclone Data Center. The wind speed and pressure in the time series represent the maximum sustained wind speed and central pressure of Typhoon Khanun at each corresponding time step, respectively.
Jmse 13 01718 g005
Figure 6. Spatial variation in EPV during the passage of Typhoon Khanun (2017). The arrow direction indicates the wind direction, and the arrow length represents the wind speed; the background color transitions from blue to red, denoting progressively stronger winds.
Figure 6. Spatial variation in EPV during the passage of Typhoon Khanun (2017). The arrow direction indicates the wind direction, and the arrow length represents the wind speed; the background color transitions from blue to red, denoting progressively stronger winds.
Jmse 13 01718 g006
Figure 7. The This figure presents temperature variations, and the absence of dark red indicates that temperatures did not rise to the corresponding levels. We have now revised the caption accordingly. left map shows the sea surface temperature difference on 11 and 18 October 2017, observed by GHRSST. The right map shows the sea surface temperature difference on 11 and 18 October 2017, simulated by ROMS. Colors indicate the temperature difference in °C.
Figure 7. The This figure presents temperature variations, and the absence of dark red indicates that temperatures did not rise to the corresponding levels. We have now revised the caption accordingly. left map shows the sea surface temperature difference on 11 and 18 October 2017, observed by GHRSST. The right map shows the sea surface temperature difference on 11 and 18 October 2017, simulated by ROMS. Colors indicate the temperature difference in °C.
Jmse 13 01718 g007
Figure 8. SMAP Level 3 8-day running mean sea surface salinity (SSS) data showing the SSS as Typhoon Khanun passed: (Left) 11 October 2017; (Middle) 15 October 2017; (Right) SSS difference between 15 October and 11 October 2017. The color bar denotes salinity in psu.
Figure 8. SMAP Level 3 8-day running mean sea surface salinity (SSS) data showing the SSS as Typhoon Khanun passed: (Left) 11 October 2017; (Middle) 15 October 2017; (Right) SSS difference between 15 October and 11 October 2017. The color bar denotes salinity in psu.
Jmse 13 01718 g008
Figure 9. Sea surface salinity simulated by ROMS on 11 and 15 October 2017.
Figure 9. Sea surface salinity simulated by ROMS on 11 and 15 October 2017.
Jmse 13 01718 g009
Figure 10. GPM-measured rain rates at 00:00 UTC on 16 October 2017. The color bar denotes rainfall rate in mm/h. White indicates no rain.
Figure 10. GPM-measured rain rates at 00:00 UTC on 16 October 2017. The color bar denotes rainfall rate in mm/h. White indicates no rain.
Jmse 13 01718 g010
Figure 11. Spatial distribution of sea surface current fields on 11 and 15 October 2017.
Figure 11. Spatial distribution of sea surface current fields on 11 and 15 October 2017.
Jmse 13 01718 g011
Figure 12. (Left) Upwelling on 11 October 2017. (Right) Upwelling on 15 October 2017.
Figure 12. (Left) Upwelling on 11 October 2017. (Right) Upwelling on 15 October 2017.
Jmse 13 01718 g012
Figure 13. Vertical temperature profile across a transect perpendicular to Typhoon Khanun’s track on 11 October 2017.
Figure 13. Vertical temperature profile across a transect perpendicular to Typhoon Khanun’s track on 11 October 2017.
Jmse 13 01718 g013
Figure 14. Along-track temperature profile on 11 October 2017. Along-track temperature profile on 15 October 2017.The upper panel presents the simulation results from ROMS, while the lower panel shows the CMEMS data.
Figure 14. Along-track temperature profile on 11 October 2017. Along-track temperature profile on 15 October 2017.The upper panel presents the simulation results from ROMS, while the lower panel shows the CMEMS data.
Jmse 13 01718 g014
Table 1. Performance metrics for SST and SSH predictions (computed at same time snapshot by spatial aggregation over all grid points within the study domain).
Table 1. Performance metrics for SST and SSH predictions (computed at same time snapshot by spatial aggregation over all grid points within the study domain).
SST-DateR2RMSE (°C)MAB (°C)
11–October0.7540.3170.248
13–October0.6980.3250.255
15–October0.5620.6410.528
18–October0.7460.4730.366
SSH-DateR2RMSE (m)MAB (m)
11–October0.7480.0910.080
13–October0.8360.0790.065
15–October0.8850.0830.067
18–October0.6350.0990.076
Table 2. Variation in EPV during Khanun passage (2017).
Table 2. Variation in EPV during Khanun passage (2017).
TimeMax (m/s)Min (m/s)Mean (m/s)
13 October 2017 18:00 1.473314 × 10 4 8.098580 × 10 5 1.360476 × 10 6
14 October 2017 12:00 2.617117 × 10 4 1.143828 × 10 4 6.691335 × 10 6
14 October 2017 18:00 2.930966 × 10 4 1.286407 × 10 4 7.200891 × 10 6
15 October 2017 00:00 3.007686 × 10 4 1.425602 × 10 4 6.131098 × 10 6
15 October 2017 06:00 3.080665 × 10 4 1.430707 × 10 4 5.253523 × 10 6
15 October 2017 12:00 3.266482 × 10 4 1.379800 × 10 4 3.241878 × 10 6
Maximum: maximum upward EPV in the area. Minimum: maximum downward EPV in the area. Mean: the average EPV in the area.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guo, F.; Chai, X.; Li, Y.; Fu, D. Upper Ocean Response to Typhoon Khanun in the South China Sea from Multiple-Satellite Observations and Numerical Simulations. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2025, 13, 1718. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13091718

AMA Style

Guo F, Chai X, Li Y, Fu D. Upper Ocean Response to Typhoon Khanun in the South China Sea from Multiple-Satellite Observations and Numerical Simulations. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2025; 13(9):1718. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13091718

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guo, Fengcheng, Xia Chai, Yongze Li, and Dongyang Fu. 2025. "Upper Ocean Response to Typhoon Khanun in the South China Sea from Multiple-Satellite Observations and Numerical Simulations" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 13, no. 9: 1718. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13091718

APA Style

Guo, F., Chai, X., Li, Y., & Fu, D. (2025). Upper Ocean Response to Typhoon Khanun in the South China Sea from Multiple-Satellite Observations and Numerical Simulations. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 13(9), 1718. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13091718

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop