Next Article in Journal
Sustainable Maritime Transportation in Fluctuating Market: Technologies, Innovations, and Challenges
Previous Article in Journal
Review of Ship Risk Analyses Through Deficiencies Found in Port State Inspections
Previous Article in Special Issue
Shallow Gas Distribution Influenced by the Interface of Sedimentary Facies in the Southwest of the Qiongdongnan Basin
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Advances in Marine Gas Hydrate Exploration and Discovery

1
Sanya Institute of South China Sea Geology, Guangzhou Marine Geological Survey, China Geological Survey, Sanya 572024, China
2
National Engineering Research Center of Gas Hydrate Exploration and Development, Guangzhou 511458, China
3
Institute of Deep Sea Science and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Sanya 572000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2025, 13(9), 1689; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13091689 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 4 August 2025 / Accepted: 28 August 2025 / Published: 2 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Marine Gas Hydrate Exploration and Discovery)
Natural gas hydrates are extensively distributed across terrestrial permafrost zones and continental margins worldwide [1]. Recognized as a clean and efficient energy resource, they have attracted significant exploration interest from major global economies [2,3,4,5]. In recent decades, substantial progress has been achieved in hydrate exploration and discovery, driven by advancements in multidisciplinary approaches, including geological, geophysical, and geochemical investigations, as well as numerical simulation techniques [6]. Current research on gas hydrate focuses on several critical aspects: (1) the origin of hydrate gas and its genetic relationship with deep conventional oil and gas reservoirs [7,8,9]; (2) the mechanisms governing hydrate accumulation and reservoir formation [10]; (3) the spatial heterogeneity in hydrate deposits, including their characteristics, evolution, and controlling factors [11]); and (4) innovations in drilling and production testing technologies [12,13,14]. This research domain represents a highly interdisciplinary field, integrating knowledge from tectonics, sedimentology, geophysics, geochemistry, petrology, mineralogy, and numerical modeling [15]. The expansion of this field has been facilitated by advancements in field exploration methodologies, laboratory analytical techniques, and computational simulation capabilities. Substantial progress in gas hydrate research has been driven by scientific and technological breakthroughs, including field exploration and discoveries in the South China Sea (SCS) [16] and other continental margins worldwide [17], as well as laboratory-based numerical simulations [18,19]. This Special Issue aims to advance research on gas hydrate exploration and discovery in continental margins as well as gas hydrate test mining simulation, with an emphasis on the mechanism of accumulation and the assessment of marine hydrate’s environmental and resource benefits. By addressing these key aspects, we seek to provide theoretical insights and methodological frameworks to support future exploration, drilling, and test production of marine hydrates.
Understanding the controlling factors of submarine gas seepage and bottom current activity on pockmark formation and development is crucial for interpreting seafloor geomorphological evolution. Li et al. (contribution 1) revealed that in the northwestern Xisha Uplift region, deep-sourced gas migrates along fault systems, fractures, and gas chimneys before escaping at the seafloor, where it forms characteristic pockmark features. Their study further demonstrates that established pockmarks undergo significant modification under the influence of bottom current activity.
Precise identification of mass transport deposits (MTDs) in gas hydrate exploration significantly improves bottom simulating reflector (BSR) detection accuracy and facilitates refined resource assessment. Gong et al. (contribution 2) demonstrated that MTDs with low-permeability, high-density properties effectively cap shallow deep-sea fluids. These deposits inhibit upward free gas migration from underlying strata, promoting gas accumulation for hydrate formation below.
Identifying hydrate gas sources is crucial for predicting their distribution. Zhong et al. (contribution 3) employed acid extraction in deepwater depressions to detect hydrocarbons, proposing a “lower-generation, upper-accumulation, and micro-fracture leakage” model to explain hydrocarbon anomalies in the Chaoshan Depression, SCS. Here, underlying reservoirs control hydrocarbon migration via micro-fractures to seabed surfaces. Su et al. (contribution 4) suggested thermogenic gas, associated with mud diapirism and fault migration, as the primary hydrate source.
Shallow gas, with substantial resource potential, has been verified through 3D seismic data and drilling in deepwater areas. Yang et al. (contribution 5) employed seismic data and geophysical attributes to examine how sedimentary facies interfaces control shallow gas distribution. Their study revealed that vertically stacked channelized submarine fans, which onlap these facies interfaces, serve as primary shallow gas reservoirs. The researchers found sand-rich sediments aligned along the southwest-northeast trending facies boundary, effectively constraining shallow gas accumulation within the basin.
The three-phase coexistence zone (hydrate-gas-water) represents a critical research focus internationally due to its high exploitation potential. Yu et al. (contribution 6) established an advanced characterization model by applying deterministic complex geological modeling techniques combined with seismic and logging data. Their model accurately captures geological structure interactions while using them as auxiliary constraints, significantly reducing accuracy uncertainties caused by complex geological conditions.
Understanding how mineral composition, grain size, and sedimentary processes govern gas hydrate accumulation is crucial for predicting reservoir distribution and guiding exploration. Bai et al. (contribution 7) demonstrated that while grain size shows limited influence, clay mineral content (particularly smectite) in fine-grained sediments significantly inhibits hydrate formation, highlighting mineralogy’s dominant role in accumulation efficiency.
Understanding the accumulation and evolutionary processes of gas hydrates is crucial for elucidating their formation mechanisms and assessing resource potential. Guan et al. (contribution 8) developed a novel flow-reaction model to investigate the spatiotemporal evolution of gas hydrate systems in the SCS. Their study systematically compared six distinct environmental scenarios and three cases of paleo-hydrate occurrence. Remarkably, the simulation results demonstrate strong concordance with observed field distributions of massive hydrate reservoirs dating back to 30 kyr BP (before present), providing valuable validation of the model’s predictive capabilities.
Understanding the mechanical properties of gas hydrate-bearing sediments (GHBS) is essential for safe and sustainable hydrate production. Yuan et al. (contribution 9) revealed that elevated hydrate saturation and confining pressure substantially improve GHBS strength and stiffness, while inducing more significant dilatancy during shear. Their study further demonstrates hydrate’s dual role in pore-filling and sediment-cementation, with both effects being strongly dependent on saturation and confinement conditions.
Wan et al. (contribution 10) developed a gas hydrate reservoir model using China’s offshore hydrate test data, numerically analyzing production behavior and reservoir evolution during stepwise depressurization via vertical wells. Their results demonstrate that this approach sustains favorable gas-to-water ratios while enhancing production efficiency—reducing water output mitigates sanding issues and improves economic viability.
Sand production significantly challenges marine gas hydrate extraction. Liu et al. (contribution 11) investigated gas-water-sand inflow patterns in both well orientations. For screen-only completions, sand control precision should be tiered based on screen plugging heterogeneity. Gravel-packed completions require (1) increased gravel density without reservoir destabilization, (2) cement-coated gravel for enhanced stability, and (3) screen precision tailored to particle size distribution for sustained production.
Shi et al. (contribution 12) conducted physical and numerical simulations of gravel packing to evaluate reduced-density materials and their packing/sand control performance. Their numerical results demonstrated that lightweight ceramsite performs poorly in horizontal and highly deviated wells due to inadequate compaction and insufficient sand retention, particularly with viscous slurries. In contrast, high-density particles promote better gravitational settling, yielding superior packing density and sand control effectiveness.
Assessing seafloor subsidence during hydrate extraction is crucial for safe gas hydrate production. Song and Zou (contribution 13) employed a modified Mohr–Coulomb model to characterize hydrate-bearing sediments, tracking strength degradation during depressurization. Using shear strength analysis to evaluate slope stability, they demonstrated that hydrate dissociation progressively slows during extraction. Their results indicate that large-scale submarine landslides triggered by hydrate decomposition are unlikely to occur.

Funding

This research was funded by the Project of Sanya Yazhou Bay Science and Technology City (No. SCKJ-JYRC-2023-02). First batch of the “Nanhai New Star” project (NHXXRCXM202357). Sanya Science and Technology Special Fund (No. 2022KJCX14). National Engineering Research Center of Gas Hydrate Exploration and Development (No. NERC2024002). National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42176215). Hainan Province Science and Technology Special Fund (No. GHYF2025017).

Acknowledgments

We sincerely appreciate all contributors for their insightful research in this Special Issue, the reviewers for their rigorous evaluations and constructive feedback, and the JMSE editorial team for their exceptional support and professional dedication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Li, X.; Guo, X.; Tian, F.; Fang, X. The Effects of Controlling Gas Escape and Bottom Current Activity on the Evolution of Pockmarks in the Northwest of the Xisha Uplift, South China Sea. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12, 1505. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12091505.
  • Gong, Y.; Yang, S.; Liang, J.; Tian, D.; Lu, J.; Deng, W.; Meng, M. Identification of Mass Transport Deposits and Insights into Gas Hydrate Accumulation in the Qiongdongnan Sea Area, Northern South China Sea. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12, 855. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12060855.
  • Zhong, G.; Zhao, J.; Zhao, Z.; Zhang, K.; Yu, J.; Shang, C.; Tu, G.; Feng, C. Acid-Extracted Hydrocarbon Anomalies and Significance in the Chaoshan Depression of the Northern South China Sea. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12, 909. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12060909.
  • Su, P.; Zhao, Z.; Zhang, K. The Mesozoic Subduction Zone over the Dongsha Waters of the South China Sea and Its Significance in Gas Hydrate Accumulation. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12, 1432. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12081432.
  • Yang, T.; Li, X.; Jin, J.; Chen, J.; Gong, Z.; Zhao, L.; Wang, W.; Liu, B.; Hu, J.; Wang, W.; et al. Shallow Gas Distribution Influenced by the Interface of Sedimentary Facies in the Southwest of the Qiongdongnan Basin. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2025, 13, 301. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13020301.
  • Yu, H.; Wang, J.; Deng, W.; Kuang, Z.; Li, T.; Lei, Z. High-Resolution 3D Geological Modeling of Three-Phase Zone Coexisting Hydrate, Gas, and Brine. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12, 2171. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12122171.
  • Bai, C.; Wang, H.; Li, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, X. Controls on Deep and Shallow Gas Hydrate Reservoirs in the Dongsha Area, South China Sea: Evidence from Sediment Properties. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12, 696. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12050696.
  • Guan, J.; Wang, M.; Zhang, W.; Wan, L.; Haeckel, M.; Wu, Q. Representative Dynamic Accumulation of Hydrate-Bearing Sediments in Gas Chimney System since 30 Kyr BP in the QiongDongNan Area, Northern South China Sea. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12, 834. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12050834.
  • Yuan, Q.; Kong, L.; Liang, Q.; Liang, J.; Yang, L.; Dong, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wu, X. Mechanical Characteristics of Gas Hydrate-Bearing Sediments: An Experimental Study from the South China Sea. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12, 301. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12020301.
  • Wan, T.; Li, Z.; Lu, H.; Wen, M.; Chen, Z.; Tian, L.; Li, Q.; Qu, J.; Wang, J. Numerical Simulation of Gas Production Behavior Using Stepwise Depressurization with a Vertical Well in the Shenhu Sea Area Hydrate Reservoir of the South China Sea. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12, 1169. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12071169.
  • Liu, C.; Dong, C.; Shi, H.; Yu, Y.; Yin, B. Gas–Water–Sand Inflow Patterns and Completion Optimization in Hydrate Wells with Different Sand Control Completions. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12, 2071. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12112071.
  • Shi, H.; Dong, C.; Zhan, X.; Liu, C.; Li, L.; Ji, J.; Yu, Y.; Li, Z. Selection Results of Solid Material for Horizontal and Highly-Deviated Well Completion Gravel-Packing: Experiments, Numerical Simulation and Proposal. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12, 1690. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12101690.
  • Song, B.; Zou, Q. Seafloor Subsidence Evaluation Due to Hydrate Depressurization Recovery in the Shenhu Area, South China Sea. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12, 1410. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12081410.

References

  1. Makogon, Y.F. Natural gas hydrates—A promising source of energy. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2010, 2, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Matsumoto, R.; Ryu, B.J.; Lee, S.R.; Lin, S.; Wu, S.; Sain, K.; Pecher, I.; Riedel, M. Occurrence and exploration of gas hydrate in the marginal seas and continental margin of the Asia and Oceania region. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2011, 28, 1751–1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bahk, J.J.; Kim, D.H.; Chun, J.H.; Son, B.K.; Kim, J.H.; Ryu, B.J.; Torres, M.E.; Riedel, M.; Schultheiss, P. Gas hydrate occurrences and their relation to host sediment properties: Results from second Ulleung Basin gas hydrate drilling expedition, East Sea. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2013, 47, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Oyama, A.; Masutani, S.M. A review of the methane hydrate program in Japan. Energies 2017, 10, 1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Boswell, R.; Myshakin, E.; Moridis, G.; Konno, Y.; Collett, T.S.; Reagan, M.; Ajayi, T.; Seol, Y. India National Gas Hydrate Program Expedition 02 summary of scientific results: Numerical simulation of reservoir response to depressurization. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2019, 108, 154–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chong, Z.R.; Yang, S.H.B.; Babu, P.; Linga, P.; Li, X.S. Review of natural gas hydrates as an energy resource: Prospects and challenges. Appl. Energy 2016, 162, 1633–1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pohlman, J.W.; Canuel, E.A.; Chapman, N.R.; Spence, G.D.; Whiticar, M.J.; Coffin, R.B. The origin of thermogenic gas hydrates on the northern Cascadia Margin as inferred from isotopic (13C/12C and D/H) and molecular composition of hydrate and vent gas. Org. Geochem. 2005, 36, 703–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, W.; Liang, J.; Wei, J.; Su, P.; Lin, L.; Huang, W. Origin of natural gases and associated gas hydrates in the Shenhu area, northern South China Sea: Results from the China gas hydrate drilling expeditions. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2019, 183, 103953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dixit, G.; Ram, H.; Kumar, P. Origin of gas in gas hydrates as interpreted from geochemistry data obtained during the National Gas Hydrate Program Expedition 02, Krishna Godavari Basin, offshore India. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2019, 108, 389–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Santra, M.; Flemings, P.B.; Scott, E.; Meazell, P.K. Evolution of gas hydrate–bearing deep-water channel-levee system in abyssal Gulf of Mexico: Levee growth and deformation. AAPG Bull. 2020, 104, 1921–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tréhu, A.M.; Long, P.E.; Torres, M.E.; Bohrmann, G.R.R.F.; Rack, F.R.; Collett, T.S.; Goldberg, D.S.; Milkov, A.V.; Riedel, M.; Schultheiss, P.; et al. Three-dimensional distribution of gas hydrate beneath southern Hydrate Ridge: Constraints from ODP Leg 204. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2004, 222, 845–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Konno, Y.; Fujii, T.; Sato, A.; Akamine, K.; Naiki, M.; Masuda, Y.; Yamamoto, K.; Nagao, J. Key findings of the world’s first offshore methane hydrate production test off the coast of Japan: Toward future commercial production. Energy Fuels 2017, 31, 2607–2616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, J.F.; Ye, J.L.; Qin, X.W.; Qiu, H.J.; Wu, N.Y.; Lu, H.L.; Xie, W.W.; Lu, J.A.; Peng, F.; Xu, Z.Q.; et al. The first offshore natural gas hydrate production test in South China Sea. China Geol. 2018, 1, 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ye, J.L.; Qin, X.W.; Xie, W.W.; Lu, H.L.; Mam, B.J.; Qiu, H.J.; Liang, J.Q.; Lu, J.A.; Kuang, Z.G.; Lu, C.; et al. The second natural gas hydrate production test in the South China Sea. China Geol. 2020, 3, 197–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wei, N.; Pei, J.; Li, H.; Zhou, S.; Zhao, J.; Kvamme, B.; Coffin, R.B.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Xue, J. Classification of natural gas hydrate resources: Review, application and prospect. Gas Sci. Eng. 2024, 124, 205269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, J.W.; Li, X.S. Recent advances on natural gas hydrate exploration and development in the South China Sea. Energy Fuels 2021, 35, 7528–7552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Medhi, N.; Borthakur, P.P. An Extensive Review on Gas Hydrates: Recent Patents, Properties, Formation, Detection, Production, Importance, and Challenges. Recent Pat. Eng. 2025, 19, E080524229746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Schicks, J.M.; Haeckel, M.; Janicki, G.; Spangenberg, E.; Thaler, J.; Giese, R.; Strauch, B.; Heeschen, K.; Priegnitz, M.; Luzi-Helbing, M.; et al. Development, test, and evaluation of exploitation technologies for the application of gas production from natural gas hydrate reservoirs and their potential application in the Danube Delta, Black Sea. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2020, 120, 104488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Peng, Z.; Shan, Z.; Sun, B.; Sun, J. Recent advances in methods of gas recovery from hydrate-bearing sediments: A Review. Energy Fuels 2022, 36, 5550–5593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, W.; Su, P.; Wang, J.; Liang, Q. Advances in Marine Gas Hydrate Exploration and Discovery. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2025, 13, 1689. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13091689

AMA Style

Zhang W, Su P, Wang J, Liang Q. Advances in Marine Gas Hydrate Exploration and Discovery. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2025; 13(9):1689. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13091689

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Wei, Pibo Su, Jiliang Wang, and Qianyong Liang. 2025. "Advances in Marine Gas Hydrate Exploration and Discovery" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 13, no. 9: 1689. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13091689

APA Style

Zhang, W., Su, P., Wang, J., & Liang, Q. (2025). Advances in Marine Gas Hydrate Exploration and Discovery. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 13(9), 1689. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13091689

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop