Next Article in Journal
Size Structure of Hawksbill Turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata) from Taxidermied Specimens in Private Collections Captured Along the Western Coast of the Gulf of California
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring Simulation Methods to Counter Cyber-Attacks on the Steering Systems of the Maritime Autonomous Surface Ship (MASS)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Marine Rare Earth Elements: Distribution Patterns, Enrichment Mechanisms and Microbial Interactions

MNR Key Laboratory of Marine Mineral Resources, Guangzhou Marine Geological Survey, Guangzhou 510075, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2025, 13(8), 1471; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13081471
Submission received: 29 April 2025 / Revised: 13 June 2025 / Accepted: 15 July 2025 / Published: 31 July 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Geological Oceanography)

Abstract

Rare earth elements and yttrium (REY) are critical metals underpinning high-technology industries. Marine deposits have attracted growing interest due to their abundant REY reserves and high grades. This review synthesizes current knowledge on sources, distribution, and enrichment mechanisms of marine REY, with a particular focus on the role of microorganisms in REY phase transitions, fractionation, and enrichment. We highlight the largely untapped potential of marine-specific microbial strains and critically assess their influence on REY cycling. Key research challenges are proposed, followed by actionable directions to advance understanding of microbial–REY interactions. This review aims to deepen insights into marine REY cycling and support the sustainable development of deep-sea REY resources, emphasizing the need to integrate molecular-scale microbial processes into marine REY biogeochemical models.

1. Introduction

Rare earth elements and yttrium (REY) include scandium (Sc) and yttrium (Y), along with 15 lanthanide elements: lanthanum (La), cerium (Ce), praseodymium (Pr), neodymium (Nd), promethium (Pm, not found naturally on earth), samarium (Sm), europium (Eu), gadolinium (Gd), terbium (Tb), dysprosium (Dy), holmium (Ho), erbium (Er), thulium (Tm), ytterbium (Yb), and lutetium (Lu) [1]. Based on their chemical properties, REY are commonly divided into light REY (LREY) as La, Ce, Pr, Nd, and Pm; Middle REY (MREY) as Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, and Dy; and Heavy REY (HREY) as Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu, Sc, and Y [2]. Some categorizations do not specifically separate MREY, Sm, and Eu, which are also divided into LREY, while Gd, Tb, and Dy are divided into HREY. Their electronic configurations and physicochemical properties make REY play a critical role in modern industries and military technologies, such as optoelectronics, electric vehicles, superconductors, and nuclear energy [2].
Beyond the traditional terrestrial deposits, REY can enter the marine environment through weathering and erosion of continental materials, windborne dust, and possible hydrothermal activity, ultimately accumulating in deep-sea sediments via complex biogeochemical cycling [3,4,5,6]. With rising demand for REY, the deep sea has recently gained increasing attention as a potential REY resource [4,5]. Understanding the enrichment and circulation processes of marine REY is essential for sustainable development. This review summarizes current knowledge on the occurrence, distribution, and enrichment mechanisms of REY in the marine system, including seawater and deep-sea sediments, with a particular focus on potential microbe–REY interactions. Key findings from recent studies are discussed, alongside unresolved questions requiring further exploration (Figure 1).

2. REY in Seawater

2.1. Sources and Distribution of REY in Seawater

Terrestrial input is the primary source of marine REY, with rivers delivering dissolved and particulate REY from continental weathering into the ocean [5]. Contributions also come from atmospheric deposition, aeolian dust, volcanic emissions, and anthropogenic activities [3,5,6] (Figure 1). However, fluxes from riverine and aeolian sources remain poorly constrained [16]. Spatially, REY concentrations in seawater vary greatly. A recent review reported dissolved REY concentration in open and coastal water columns in detail and revealed seawater REY concentration spanning from the order of 10−2 to 102, generally decreasing concentrations from LREY to HREY [3]. The highest REY concentrations are typically observed in offshore marine areas, where riverine discharge and anthropogenic activities are control factors [3]. In these areas, REY concentrations decrease with depth before stabilizing, while in the open ocean, concentrations generally increase with depth [3,5]. Notably, Ce exhibits a unique distribution pattern due to its redox sensitivity. In oxic environments, dissolved Ce (III) oxidizes to Ce (IV), forming insoluble CeO2 and causing concentration characteristic anomalies in seawater [6,17,18,19,20,21]. In recent years, the dissolved REY concentration observed data in the open ocean have been spread across four oceans, with the Pacific Ocean having the largest dataset (Figure 2, Supplementary Table S1). The measurement areas include the Western Pacific, South Pacific, North Pacific, Northwest Pacific, subarctic, and equatorial Pacific, with the deepest sampling depth reaching up to 5663 m (Figure 2, Supplementary Table S1). The highest concentration of dissolved REY was measured in the surface water of the Atlantic Ocean, approximately 423 pmol/kg, which might be due to its sampling location being close to the shore (Figure 2, Supplementary Table S1). However, the REY concentration data in the Indian Ocean is still insufficient (Figure 2, Supplementary Table S1). Ocean circulation and water mass mixing are also major drivers of REY distribution in seawater. In deep-sea environments, vertical flux can be limited by restricted surface water input, constraining vertical mixing. This oceanic supply may exceed terrestrial inputs (e.g., rivers or atmospheric deposition) [3,22]. Additionally, redox conditions (e.g., anoxic or euxinic environments) favor REY retention by inhibiting the oxidative dissolution of carrier phases such as organic matter and sulfides [23]. Recent studies also highlight that biological processes play a role in REY transport to deeper waters, for example, REY uptake by diatoms and subsequent organic matter degradation may facilitate REY enrichment and redistribution in the deep ocean [14].

2.2. Speciation and Fractionation of REY in Seawater

Once REY enter the marine system, they exist in various forms and are typically categorized by their state and particle size into three groups: (i) “particulate REY”, associated with solid particles (>0.2 or 0.45 μm); (ii) “dissolved REY”, bound to colloids and nanoparticles (<0.2 μm); and (iii) “truly dissolved REY”, present as individual hydrated ions or chemical complexes [3,24]. Within the dissolved fraction, most REY occur as trivalent ions (REY3+), except for Ce (which can also exist as Ce4+) and Eu (which may appear as Eu2+ or Eu4+) due to their distinct redox behaviors [6,17,18,19,20,21,25].
The transformation between particulate and dissolved REYs significantly influences their spatial distribution, vertical transport, and fractionation in the ocean [3,26]. This phase exchange is governed not only by inorganic geochemical processes but also by biogeochemical interactions. Microorganisms, including bacteria, fungi, and certain microalgae, play a crucial role in REY cycling and transformation [3,6,14]. Through biological processes [3,26] such as biosorption, bioaccumulation, and bioprecipitation, they can promote the conversion of dissolved REYs into particulate forms and facilitate their downward transport [5,27]. Processes like redoxolysis, acidolysis, and complexolysis are conducive to particle degradation, conversely [5,27] (Figure 1). This will be further explored in Section 4. Additionally, REY speciation and fractionation in seawater are also influenced by environmental factors, including salinity, temperature, redox conditions, and the availability of ligands, especially phosphates and carbonates [3]. Moreover, pH/redox potential (Eh) changes is another important impact factor; lower pH increases REY solubility, while alkaline conditions promote adsorption/co-precipitation [23,28]. These factors affect both the stability and mobility of REY in marine environments.
Figure 2. Distribution map of dissolved rare earth elements in open ocean. Data are derived from observed data published since 2000 [8,26,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46], and have been modified manually. Stations were separated by maximum sampling depth and represented by different color in this figure. The circle size represents the maximum value of total dissolved rare earth element concentrations (ΣREY, note Pm, Sc, and Y not included) measured at this station.
Figure 2. Distribution map of dissolved rare earth elements in open ocean. Data are derived from observed data published since 2000 [8,26,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46], and have been modified manually. Stations were separated by maximum sampling depth and represented by different color in this figure. The circle size represents the maximum value of total dissolved rare earth element concentrations (ΣREY, note Pm, Sc, and Y not included) measured at this station.
Jmse 13 01471 g002

3. REY in Deep-Sea Sediments

3.1. Deep-Sea Sediments REY Sources and Distribution

After entering the marine system, REY undergo cycling and migration processes, ultimately becoming enriched in deep-sea sediments. High REY concentrations were first reported in deep-sea sediments from the eastern South Pacific and central North Pacific in 2011 [4], with total REY contents reaching 1000–2230 μg/g—comparable to or exceeding those found in South China’s ion-adsorption-type rare earth deposits [4]. Subsequent surveys have detected sedimental REY concentrations in many different sea areas [3,6] and identified additional REY-rich deposits in the Indian Ocean, the Southeastern Pacific, and the Western Pacific [47,48,49,50,51,52,53]. These deposits are typically located in deep-sea basins at depths >4000 m, and are notably enriched in middle to heavy REY, while sediments in marginal seas and shallow waters show relatively low REY concentrations [4]. Based on oceanic geology and sediment REY distribution, four major deep-sea REY metallogenic belts have been identified (Table 1) [54]: (1) Western Pacific deep-sea REY deposit, (2) the Central-Eastern Pacific deep-sea REY deposit, (3) Southeastern Pacific deep-sea REY deposit, and (4) Central Indian Ocean Basin–Wharton Basin deep-sea REY deposit. Among them, the Western Pacific deposit shows the highest REY concentrations, with ΣREY values reaching 6000–8000 × 10−6 μg/g, indicating its significant resource potential for REY exploration [49,51,55].
Current evidence suggests that the direct sources of REY in deep-sea sediments are seawater and pore water. Diffusion from pore water may serve as an important benthic input for sediment REY [7,8], yet available pore water REY concentration data remain scarce, with fewer than 500 reported measurements to date [6]. Additionally, volcanic and hydrothermal processes have also been proposed as potential contributors to REY enrichment in deep-sea sediments [4]. Studies in the southeastern Pacific show that REY-rich mud formation and REY mobilization appear closely associated with hydrothermal activity along the East Pacific Rise [56,57,58]. Microorganisms at oceanic ridge hydrothermal vents can also facilitate REY-rich mineral formation through sulfide redox mediation, and rapid fluid quenching at vent sites also precipitates REY-bearing particles [59]. However, in the Central and Northern Pacific, Western Pacific, and Indian Ocean, REY enrichment in sediments seems to lack direct hydrothermal influence [50,52,55,58]. The overall influence of volcanic and hydrothermal processes remains debated.

3.2. REY Enrichment Process in Deep-Sea Sediments

A primary pathway for REY removal from seawater is vertical transport via surface adsorption and particle settling, leading to their sequestration in sediments [3]. Low sedimentation rates (<1 cm/kyr) enhance REY enrichment through prolonged seawater–particle interaction [60]. Authigenic mineral phases, such as biogenic apatite at the sediment-water interface, can further capture REY from overlying seawater through lattice incorporation or surface adsorption [6,61,62] (Figure 1). Additionally, microbial activity in sediments may facilitate REY enrichment through biosorption and metabolic processes [11,12,63]; this topic is explored further in Section 4 on microbe–REY interactions. REY accumulation in deep-sea sediments is influenced by multiple factors, including early diagenesis—the process of secondary precipitate authigenic phases formed on or around diagenesis [7,53,64]. Other factors, such as sedimentation rate [4], bottom currents [49,53,65,66], and hydrothermal activity, can also influence REY enrichment in sediment [4,56], biological productivity [65,67,68], and redox conditions [67]. The carbonate compensation depth (CCD), silica compensation depth (SCD), and mineralogical composition also significantly influence REY occurrence and distribution [4,65,67,69,70]. Once incorporated into sediments, REY may either become mineralized and permanently sequestered or be remobilized and re-enter geochemical cycling depending on microbial activity, sedimentation rate, and hydrodynamics [3]. However, current evidence suggests that REY remobilization back into the marine cycle is minimal.
In deep-sea sediments, REY are primarily hosted in biogenic apatite, clay minerals, and Fe-Mn micronodules, with strong associations to elements such as phosphorus (P), calcium (Ca), and aluminum (Al) [48,66,71]. Among these, biogenic apatite is considered the most significant host due to its high REY-loading capacity [67], with concentrations typically one–two orders of magnitude higher than other carrier phases, reaching up to 104 ppm [9,67,72]. The formation of REY-rich phosphates in deep-sea sediments is influenced by low sedimentation rates, high background REY levels, and deep-water non-carbonate depositional environments [9]. REY enrichment within apatite lattices primarily occurs via ion exchange, where REY is substituted for Ca2+ within crystal structures [69]. Aluminosilicate clay minerals (<2 μm) serve as potential REY carriers [73,74]. Clay interlayer exchangeable cation sites, along with electrostatic adsorption and complexation, enhance their REY-binding capacity. Clay-charged surfaces also bind REY via ion exchange, especially in coastal zones influenced by terrestrial input [75,76]. Clays may also release REY to pore water or biogenic apatite through early diagenetic processes, contributing to REY redistribution within sediments [77,78,79]. The role of Fe-Mn micronodules in REY enrichment and sequestration remains debated. Early studies suggested that Fe-Mn oxides strongly absorb REY and aid in their removal from seawater via redox cycling [51,72,80,81]. Slow-growing Fe-Mn nodules and crusts can incorporate REY directly from seawater through hydrogenetic precipitation, aided by microbial mats that stabilize particle surfaces [75]. However, recent studies attribute the marine sediments’ Fe-REY correlation to the sorption capacity of iron-rich clay minerals (e.g., aquamarine), rather than Fe-Mn oxides [5,79]. Notably, REY can also be redistributed among sedimentary mineral phases through pore water. During sediment deposition, micronodules and clays may act as temporary REY hosts, later releasing REY into pore water under early diagenetic conditions, where it is ultimately sequestered by biogenic apatite as the final host mineral [74,77,78,79] (Figure 1).

4. Microorganism–REY Interactions

Microorganisms are widely distributed across various mineralization environments, including the ocean, and microorganism–mineral interactions play a critical role in elemental cycling and ore formation [13]. Minerals provide essential substrates and energy sources for microbial communities; conversely, microorganisms actively mediate elemental deposition and mineralization through biosorption, bioaccumulation, and gene-regulated metabolic processes [3,11,63] (Figure 1 and Figure 3). Furthermore, microbial activities such as bioleaching can enhance the solubilization of particulate-bound elements into bioavailable dissolved forms [12] (Figure 1 and Figure 3). This section summarizes recent advances in REY biosorption, bioaccumulation, utilization, and bioleaching, with a focus on emerging insights into marine microbial–REY interactions and current research challenges.

4.1. REY Biosorption and Bioprecipitation

Negatively charged functional groups on microorganism cell surfaces or extracellular polymers, such as amino, carboxyl, hydroxyl, phosphate, and thiol groups in glycoproteins and polysaccharides, facilitate REY adsorption and precipitation via electrostatic interactions and ion exchange (Figure 3). These processes directly promote deep-sea REY mineralization [86,87]. Notably, biosorption is typically independent of metabolic activity and can occur on dead cells [11,13]; the composition and structure of microbial communities significantly influence REY enrichment and fractionation [11,63,88]. For instance, studies on regolith-hosted REY deposits in southeastern China revealed that bacteria play a pivotal role in HREY and LREY fractionation [63]. Specifically, actinomycetes and Gram-positive bacteria exhibit higher REY adsorption capacities than Gram-negative bacteria, fungi, and yeast, largely due to their teichoic acids-rich cell walls, which confer strong negative surface charges [63].
Current research on microbial REY biosorption mechanisms primarily focuses on species isolated from terrestrial REY deposits or on model organisms such as Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas fluorescens, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae [11,27,86,87,89,90,91,92,93]. A total of 26 fungal and bacterial species with demonstrated REY absorption ability are listed in Table 2. These studies provide direct evidence that microorganisms can mineralize REY (e.g., Ce, Yb, Sm) after adsorption, forming REY-containing mineral particles or amorphous phosphate precipitates on cell surfaces [86,90,91]. However, most research only focuses on a limited subset of REY, lacking comprehensive data across the entire REY series. Recently, genetically engineered microbial strains with enhanced REY enrichment capabilities have shown promising results in the extraction of terrestrial REY resources [94,95], highlighting the potential of microbial biotechnologies for deep-sea REY resources development.
However, compared with terrestrial microorganisms, the discovery of marine strains with REY biosorption capacity remains severely limited. To date, fewer than six marine REY-enriching bacterial species have been identified (Table 2). Recent studies have isolated marine bacterial strains (Paenisporosarcina sp., Sulfitobacter sp., Jeotgalibacillus sp.) capable of adsorbing Ce from marine sediments [10]. During Ce biomineralization, nucleation sites first form on the cell surface, followed by the development of amorphous Ce-containing mineral particles. The efficiency of enrichment is significantly affected by the REY-to-biomass ratio and the cell wall structure properties [10]. Additionally, Gram-negative bacteria Leisingera methylohalidivorans and Phaeobacter inhibens, isolated from seawater, also exhibit HREY enrichment capabilities [96,97].
In addition to promoting REY enrichment through biosorption, microorganisms can also facilitate REY enrichment via more complex, gene-regulated, or metabolically induced pathways, collectively referred to as bioprecipitation [63,98]. Some microorganisms enhance REY enrichment by altering pH or local ion concentrations [99,100]. For example, Serratia sp. has been reported to produce inorganic phosphates to extracellular polymers through cellular metabolism, which then bind with REY, leading to REY enrichment and precipitation [99].
Table 2. Fungi and bacteria identified to have REY biosorption or bioleaching capabilities.
Table 2. Fungi and bacteria identified to have REY biosorption or bioleaching capabilities.
MechanismCategoriesStrainsTested REYReferences
BiosorptionFAspergillus flavusCe[101]
FAspergillus nigerCe[101]
FBotryosphaeria rhodinaLa, Sm[102]
FCandida colliculosaNd[103]
FCandida utilisLa, Sm, Sc, Y [104]
FCatenulostroma chromoblastomycesCe, Nd, Gd, Dy[96]
FDebaryomyces hanseniiNd[103]
FFusarium sp.Nd, Gd, Dy, Lu[96]
FKluyveromyces marxianusNd[103]
FPichia naganishiiLa, Nd, Dy, Yb[96]
FPichia sp.La, Nd, Dy, Yb[96]
FSaccharomyces cerevisiaeLa, Sm, Gd, Dy, Yb, Lu, Ce[90,91,92,96,103,105]
NAgrobacterium sp.La, Ce[106]
NCaulobacter crescentusTb[107]
NEscherichia coliHREY[87,89]
NLeisingera methylohalidivoransHREY[96]
NMagnetospirillum magneticumLa[108]
NMethylobacterium extorquens *Ln[100,109]
NPaenisporosarcina sp.Ce[10]
NPhaeobacter inhibensHREY[96,97]
NPseudomonas aeruginosaLa, Eu, Yb[110]
NPseudomonas fluorescensCe, Sm[86]
NSulfitobacter sp.Ce[10]
PBacillus licheniformisCe[111]
PBacillus thuringiensisEu[112]
PJeotgalibacillus sp.Ce[10]
BioleachingFAspergillus flavusCe; REY from industry wastes[101]
FAspergillus nigerREY ore[113,114,115,116,117]
FAspergillus terreusLa, Ce, Nd, Pr[118]
FAspergillus sp.Nd, Pm, Sm, Eu, Gd[119]
FCandida bombicolaREY from coal fly ash[120]
FCryptococcus curvatusREY from coal fly ash[120]
FPaecilomyces sp.La, Ce, Nd, Pr[118,121]
FPenicillium chrysogenumLa, Ce, Y[122]
FPenicillium tricolorLa, Ce, Nd, Sc, Y[123]
FPenicillium sp.REY from monazite[124]
FPhanerochaete chrysosporiumLa, Ce, Nd, Sc, Y[120]
FYarrowia lipolyticaLa, Nd, Ce[115]
NAcetobacter acetiREY from monazite[125]
NAcetobacter sp.La, Ce, Nd, Sc, Y[126]
NAcetobacter tropicalisSc[127]
NAcidianus manzaensisCe, Gd, Sc, Y, [128]
NAcidithiobacillus ferrooxidansNd, Pm, Sm, Eu, Gd, REY from phosphogypsum[119,129,130,131,132]
NAcidithiobacillus thiooxidansLa, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Dy, Ho, Y[133,134]
NAcidophilium multivorumCe, Dy, Er, Eu, Gd, Ho, La, Nd, Pr, Sm, Tb, Tm, Lu[135]
NAspergillus ficuumREY from monazite[136]
NBurkholderia thailandensisREY from monazite[137]
NEnterobacter aerogenesREY from monazite[124]
NGluconobacter oxydansREY ore[138,139,140]
NLeptospirillum ferriphilumLa, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Lu[135]
NPantoea agglomeransREY from monazite[124]
NPseudomonas aeruginosaREY from monazite; coal fly ash[120,136]
NPseudomonas putidaREY from monazite[124]
PAlicyclobacillus toleransLa, Ce, Nd[141]
PArthrobacter nicotianaeREY ore[89]
PBacillus licheniformisCe; REY from industry wastes[111]
PBacillus sp.La, Ce, Dy, Lu[142]
PStreptomyces sp.La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu, Y[143]
F: Fungi; N: Gram-negative bacteria; P: Gram-positive bacteria; Red color: microorganism isolated from ocean or live in the ocean; * Methylobacterium extorquens facilitate REY enrichment via both biosorption and metabolic processes.

4.2. REY Bioaccumulation and Utilization

REY enrichment mechanisms are not limited to adsorption; they can also be actively taken up by living cells, where they accumulate and form granules, collectively referred to as bioaccumulation [5,13,144]. After REY-absorbed plankton die, their sinking organic matter releases REY into sediments through remineralization [28]. Unlike passive biosorption, this bioaccumulation involves energy metabolism and possibly gene-regulated biochemical processes. For instance, in Methylobacterium extorquens, genes have been identified that regulate methylolanthanin, a metal-binding molecule that complexes with lanthanides [100,109], facilitating REY transport into cells and storage in granule-like structures called lanthasomes [99,100,109]. Studies have shown that REY can accumulate in a wide range of marine organisms, including phytoplankton, zooplankton, benthic organisms, and other invertebrates [3,27,88,145]. However, bioaccumulation tends to decrease with trophic levels, a phenomenon known as “trophic dilution” [145]. Primary producers such as plankton and algae often show higher REY concentrations, likely due to their direct interaction with REY ions in seawater. Strady et al. [146] were the first to measure REY content across different-sized plankton, finding strong correlations with trivalent REY forms. Fischer et al. [147] discovered that cyanobacteria can accumulate dissolved Eu, Sm, and Nd intracellularly, with amorphous Eu particles observed inside cells for the first time.
In some aquatic organisms, REY accumulation shows site-specific localization and selectivity, potentially affecting REY fractionation and migration to the deep sea [14,148]. REY can penetrate siliceous shells, enter the cytoplasm, and even reach intracellular organelles [27] (Figure 3). In Desmodesmus quadricauda, La and Gd preferentially accumulate in the cytoplasm, while Nd and Ce concentrate in chloroplasts [149]. Similar localizations have been observed in the chloroplasts of Chlorella vulgaris and Euglena gracilis [150,151]. It has been suggested that REY incorporation into diatom siliceous shells may play a significant role in REY transport to the deep sea [14,15,82], although the extent of this impact remains debated [83,152]. While REY bioaccumulation within cells is well documented, the mechanisms underlying REY uptake, membrane transport, intracellular storage, and regulation are still poorly understood. Palasz and Czekaj [153] hypothesize that REY may enter cells via calcium ion channels, providing a promising avenue for future research into REY transport in microbial cells.
The widespread bioaccumulation of REY in marine organisms highlights their potential bioavailability. Although REY are extensively accumulated, particularly by primary producers in marine systems, their biological roles remain poorly understood and are still generally considered as non-essential elements [5]. However, growing evidence suggests that certain biological functions of REY may have been overlooked. REY have been identified as an essential cofactor in key microbial enzymes and involved in multicarbon metabolisms, such as methanol oxidation [6,84,154,155]. The first lanthanide-dependent ethanol dehydrogenase (EDH) and XoxF-type methanol dehydrogenase (MDH) were discovered in Methylobacterium extorquens AM1, whose growth is entirely REY-dependent [156]. Subsequently, REY-dependent MDH and EDH enzymes have also been found in other Gram-negative bacteria, such as Methylacidiphilum fumariolicum [157,158], Bradyrhizobium sp. [159], Methylotenera mobilis [160], Methylomonas sp. [160], Methylobacterium radiotolerans [161], and Pseudomonas putida [162] (Table 3). Additionally, a lanthanide-binding molecule, “Lanmodulin”, has also been found in Methylobacterium extorquens AM1; it is located between bacterial outer membranes and coexists with REY-dependent dehydrogenases, though its precise function remains unclear [109]. Recent analyses of global marine metagenomic and metatranscriptomic datasets have extended the known biological roles of REY to a wider range of enzymes and microbes, suggesting marine microorganisms may possess dozens of unique lanthanide-dependent genes [154]. Currently, research into REY bioutilization is still in its early stages. Some studies propose that the biological activities of REY may derive from their chemical similarity to calcium [85], with LREY more readily assimilated as free REY ions than HREY [5,146]. Among the LREY, La3+ and its hydroxide form (LaOH2+) are considered the most bioavailable, due to their high charge-to-volume ratio and strong protein-binding affinity [163].

4.3. REY Bioleaching and Degradation

Microorganisms play a crucial role not only in the enrichment and mineralization of REY but also in the decomposition and leaching of rare earth minerals. These processes include redoxolysis, acidolysis, and complexolysis [27,93] (Figure 3). Studies have identified microbes such as Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans as contributors to rare earth mineral decomposition via redox reactions [93,130,167,168,169]. These microbes oxidize Fe2+ to Fe3+, transferring electrons from the minerals to themselves and facilitating dissolution. Acidolysis involves the direct destruction of mineral lattices by protons, typically driven by the metabolic activity of sulfur and phosphate-oxidizing bacteria that produce sulfuric and phosphoric acids, which dissolve minerals and release REY [119,134,170]. Additionally, microbial metabolites such as organic acids and siderophores are key to complexation-mediated dissolution. These metabolites act as ligands that bind REY to form soluble complexes. For example, organic acids secreted by Aspergillus niger in synthetic media have been shown to efficiently dissolve REY, such as Ce, from monazite minerals, with citric acid being the most effective [93,171,172].
With the growing demand for REY, bioleaching has gained significant attention as a sustainable method for dissolving and extracting REY from terrestrial resources [93], particularly secondary sources such as phosphogypsum, red mud, and low-grade ores (Table 3). Compared with traditional chemical extraction methods, bioleaching offers advantages such as low energy consumption and environmental friendliness, making it especially suitable for processing complex mineral resources. However, current bioleaching studies remain largely focused on terrestrial REY deposits, with limited investigation into marine sediments as a potential resource. Despite its promise, the practical application still faces challenges, including efficiency improvement and cost reduction. Future research should prioritize optimizing microorganism–mineral interface interactions to enhance REY leaching performance, discovering novel microbial strains, and exploring gene regulatory mechanisms. The vast, largely unexplored diversity of marine microorganisms offers a promising frontier for developing innovative strategies in REY resource utilization.

5. Conclusions: Existing Challenges and Future Perspectives

REY are crucial to high-tech industries, driving increasing global demand [1,2]. Since the discovery of REY-rich deep-sea sediments in the Pacific Ocean, these deposits have been considered promising alternatives to terrestrial resources [4]. Significant progress has been made so far in understanding marine REY geochemical cycling, including the identification of sources, concentration and distribution patterns, fractionation behavior, and enrichment mechanisms. REY enter the ocean via continental weathering and erosion, windborne dust, and possible hydrothermal activity. Through complex biogeochemical processes—such as particle adsorption scavenging, microbe–REY interactions, and sedimentary remineralization—REY become enriched in deep-sea sediments [1,13,61] (Figure 1). To date, four deep-sea REY mineralization zones have been identified, with the largest reserves (ΣREY 6000–8000 × 10−6 μg/g) in the Western Pacific [54]. However, key gaps in marine REY research remain. First, the contribution of hydrothermal and volcanic activity to sedimentary REY enrichment varies regionally—being significant in the Eastern Pacific [56,57,58] but minor in the Central Pacific and Indian Ocean [50,52,55,58]—warranting further investigation. Second, the role of Fe-Mn micronodules in REY enrichment remains debated [5,51,72,75,79,80,81]. More evidence is needed to determine whether the observed REY-Fe correlation is driven by micronodules or by iron-rich clays, such as aquamarine [5,79]. Finally, the scarcity of REY data in pore water hampers accurate estimation of benthic REY fluxes [6].
Microbial interactions play a crucial role in mediating REY phase transitions between particulate and dissolved states, as well as REY enrichment, thus affecting REY distribution, sedimentation, bioavailability, and fractionation (Figure 3) [5,27]. Terrestrial microorganisms have been shown to promote REY enrichment through synergistic mechanisms involving surface adsorption and gene-regulated metabolisms [5,98]. However, under the extreme conditions of deep-sea sediments, such as high pressure, anaerobiosis, coexisting metals, and exceptional REY conditions, the mechanisms by which microorganisms contribute to REY enrichment still remain poorly understood. Current research mainly focuses on the inorganic adsorption mechanism, while microbial composition, functional genes, and metabolic characteristics of relevant strains in deep-sea REY-rich environments are still unclear. Microbial multi-omics approaches (e.g., metagenomic sequencing) offer essential tools to address this gap. Additionally, the challenges of culturing marine bacteria have hindered progress in studying REY-microbe interactions. As the field is still in its early stages, targeted simulation experiments are essential for advancing knowledge. Although REY are known to bioaccumulate in microbial cells, the mechanisms underlying REY uptake, membrane transport, intracellular storage, and regulation remain poorly characterized. Given the vast diversity of marine microorganisms, exploiting their metabolic potential for REY extraction and utilization represents a promising research avenue. Another major challenge is quantifying the microbial contribution to the marine REY cycle. The extent of microbial influence on REY transport and enrichment in marine environments remains difficult to assess and requires further investigation. Bridging these knowledge gaps is essential for advancing marine REY biogeochemistry and accessing its potential applications in resource development.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jmse13081471/s1, Table S1: Datasets of dissolved rare earth elements in open ocean.

Author Contributions

S.L. made the bibliographic search, illustrations, and the manuscript; Y.D. reviewed and edited the final draft. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This publication was partially funded by the Director’s Fund of Guangzhou Marine Geological Survey No. 2024GMGS-QN-12, National Natural Science Foundation of China General Program No. 42476237, and Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation No. 2023B0303000015.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declare no competing financial interests or commercial affiliations in conducting this study.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
REYRare earth elements and yttrium
LREYLight rare earth elements
MREYMiddle rare earth elements
HREYHeavy rare earth elements
MDHMethanol dehydrogenase
EDHEthanol dehydrogenase
SDHSorbose dehydrogenase
GDHGlucose dehydrogenase
LnLanthanide
CeCerium

References

  1. Balaram, V. Rare earth elements: A review of applications, occurrence, exploration, analysis, recycling, and environmental impact. Geosci. Front. 2019, 10, 1285–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chen, P.; Ilton, E.S.; Wang, Z.; Rosso, K.M.; Zhang, X. Global rare earth element resources: A concise review. Appl. Geochem. 2024, 175, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Piarulli, S.; Hansen, B.H.; Ciesielski, T.; Zocher, A.-L.; Malzahn, A.; Olsvik, P.A.; Sonne, C.; Nordtug, T.; Jenssen, B.M.; Booth, A.M. Sources, distribution and effects of rare earth elements in the marine environment: Current knowledge and research gaps. Environ. Pollut. 2021, 291, 118230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kato, Y.; Fujinaga, K.; Nakamura, K.; Takaya, Y.; Kitamura, K.; Ohta, J.; Toda, R.; Nakashima, T.; Iwamori, H. Deep-sea mud in the Pacific Ocean as a potential resource for rare-earth elements. Nat. Geosci. 2011, 4, 535–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Neira, P.; Romero-Freire, A.; Basallote, M.; Qiu, H.; Cobelo-García, A.; Cánovas, C.R. Review of the concentration, bioaccumulation, and effects of lanthanides in marine systems. Front. Mar. Sci. 2022, 9, 920405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hatje, V.; Schijf, J.; Johannesson, K.; Andrade, R.; Caetano, M.; Brito, P.; Haley, B.; Lagarde, M.; Jeandel, C. The global biogeochemical cycle of the rare earth elements. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2024, 38, e2024GB008125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Deng, Y.; Guo, Q.; Liu, C.; He, G.; Cao, J.; Liao, J.; Liu, C.; Wang, H.; Zhou, J.; Liu, Y. Early diagenetic control on the enrichment and fractionation of rare earth elements in deep-sea sediments. Sci. Adv. 2022, 8, eabn5466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Deng, Y.; Ren, J.; Guo, Q.; Cao, J.; Wang, H.; Liu, C. Rare earth element geochemistry characteristics of seawater and porewater from deep sea in western Pacific. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ren, J.; Jiang, X.; He, G.; Wang, F.; Yang, T.; Luo, S.; Deng, Y.; Zhou, J.; Deng, X.; Yao, H. Enrichment and sources of REY in phosphate fractions: Constraints from the leaching of REY-rich deep-sea sediments. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2022, 335, 155–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jiang, M.; Cao, W.; Saren, G.; Chang, F. Study on the enrichment and mineralization of rare earth element cerium by marine bacteria. Mar. Geol. Quat. Geol. 2023, 43, 190–197. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  11. Giese, E.C. Biosorption as green technology for the recovery and separation of rare earth elements. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 36, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lhamo, P.; Mahanty, B. Bioleaching of rare earth elements from industrial and electronic wastes: Mechanism and process efficiency. In Environmental Technologies to Treat Rare Earth Element Pollution: Principles and Engineering; Sinharoy, A., Lens, P.N.L., Eds.; IWA Publishing: London, UK, 2022; pp. 207–226. [Google Scholar]
  13. Dong, H.; Huang, L.; Zhao, L.; Zeng, Q.; Liu, X.; Sheng, Y.; Shi, L.; Wu, G.; Jiang, H.; Li, F. A critical review of mineral–microbe interaction and co-evolution: Mechanisms and applications. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2022, 9, nwac128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Akagi, T. Rare earth element (REE)–silicic acid complexes in seawater to explain the incorporation of REEs in opal and the “leftover” REEs in surface water: New interpretation of dissolved REE distribution profiles. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2013, 113, 174–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Akagi, T.; Fu, F.F.; Hongo, Y.; Takahashi, K. Composition of rare earth elements in settling particles collected in the highly productive North Pacific Ocean and Bering Sea: Implications for siliceous-matter dissolution kinetics and formation of two REE-enriched phases. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2011, 75, 4857–4876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Flierdt, T.V.D.; Frank, M.; Lee, D.C.; Halliday, A.N.; Reynolds, B.C.; Hein, J.R. New constraints on the sources and behavior of neodymium and hafnium in seawater from Pacific Ocean ferromanganese crusts. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2004, 68, 3827–3843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Olías, M.; Cerón, J.C.; Fernández, I.; Rosa, J.D.L. Distribution of rare earth elements in an alluvial aquifer affected by acid mine drainage: The Guadiamar aquifer (SW Spain). Environ. Pollut. 2005, 135, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Olías, M.; Cánovas, C.R.; Basallote, M.D.; Lozano, A. Geochemical behaviour of rare earth elements (REE) along a river reach receiving inputs of acid mine drainage. Chem. Geol. 2018, 493, 468–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sholkovitz, E.R.; Landing, W.M.; Lewis, B.L. Ocean particle chemistry: The fractionation of rare earth elements between suspended particles and seawater. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1994, 58, 1567–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hathorne, E.C.; Stichel, T.; Brück, B.; Frank, M. Rare earth element distribution in the atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean: The balance between particle scavenging and vertical supply. Mar. Chem. 2015, 177, 157–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Moffett, J.W. Microbially mediated cerium oxidation in sea water. Nature 1990, 345, 421–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, T.Y.; Rempfer, J.; Frank, M.; Stumpf, R.; Molina-Kescher, M. Upper ocean vertical supply: A neglected primary factor controlling the distribution of neodymium concentrations of open ocean surface waters? J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 2013, 118, 3887–3894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chester, R.; Jickells, T. Marine Geochemistry, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012; 411p. [Google Scholar]
  24. Elderfield, H.R.; Upstill-Goddard, R.; Sholkovitz, E.R. The rare earth elements in rivers, estuaries, and coastal seas and their significance to the composition of ocean waters. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1990, 54, 971–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hatje, V.; Bruland, K.W.; Flegal, A.R. Determination of rare earth elements after pre-concentration using NOBIAS-chelate PA-1®resin: Method development and application in the San Francisco Bay plume. Mar. Chem. 2014, 160, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Garcia-Solsona, E.; Jeandel, C.; Labatut, M.; Lacan, F.; Vance, D.; Chavagnac, V.; Pradoux, C. Rare earth elements and Nd isotopes tracing water mass mixing and particle-seawater interactions in the SE Atlantic. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta J. Geochem. Soc. Meteorit. Soc. 2014, 125, 351–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vítová, M.; Mezricky, D. Microbial recovery of rare earth elements from various waste sources: A mini review with emphasis on microalgae. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024, 40, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Byrne, R.H.; Kim, K.-H. Rare earth element scavenging in seawater. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1990, 54, 2645–2656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Behrens, M.K.; Pahnke, K.; Paffrath, R.; Schnetger, B.; Brumsack, H.-J. Rare earth element distributions in the West Pacific: Trace element sources and conservative vs. non-conservative behavior. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2018, 486, 166–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cao, A.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, H.; Chen, Z.; Cui, G.; Liu, Z.; Li, Y.; Liu, Q. Dissolved rare earth elements in the Northwest Pacific: Sources, water mass tracing, and cross-shelf fluxes. Front. Mar. Sci. 2023, 10, 1135113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Grenier, M.; Jeandel, C.; Lacan, F.; Vance, D.; Venchiarutti, C.; Cros, A.; Cravatte, S. From the subtropics to the central equatorial Pacific Ocean: Neodymium isotopic composition and rare earth element concentration variations. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 2013, 118, 592–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Molina-Kescher, M.; Hathorne, E.C.; Osborne, A.H.; Behrens, M.K.; Kölling, M.; Pahnke, K.; Frank, M. The influence of Basaltic Islands on the oceanic REE distribution: A case study from the Tropical South Pacific. Front. Mar. Sci. 2018, 5, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Molina-Kescher, M.; Frank, M.; Hathorne, E. South Pacific dissolved Nd isotope compositions and rare earth element distributions: Water mass mixing versus biogeochemical cycling. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2014, 127, 171–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tazoe, H.; Obata, H.; Gamo, T. Coupled isotopic systematics of surface cerium and neodymium in the Pacific Ocean. Geochem. Geophys. Geosystems 2011, 12, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cao, A.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Z.; Ren, J.; Cai, Y.; Zhou, K.; Guo, X.; Liu, X. Spatiotemporal variation of dissolved rare earth elements in the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre: Influence of biogeochemical cycling and application in tracing deep water. Glob. Planet. Change 2025, 246, 104719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fröllje, H.; Pahnke, K.; Schnetger, B.; Brumsack, H.-J.; Dulai, H.; Fitzsimmons, J.N. Hawaiian imprint on dissolved Nd and Ra isotopes and rare earth elements in the central North Pacific: Local survey and seasonal variability. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2016, 189, 110–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hongo, Y.; Obata, H.; Sotto Alibo, D.; Nozaki, Y. Spatial variations of rare earth elements in North Pacific surface water. J. Oceanogr. 2006, 62, 441–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hara, Y.; Obata, H.; Doi, T.; Hongo, Y.; Gamo, T.; Takeda, S.; Tsuda, A. Rare earth elements in seawater during an iron-induced phytoplankton bloom of the western subarctic Pacific (SEEDS-II). Deep Sea Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 2009, 56, 2839–2851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Haley, B.A.; Wu, Y.; Muratli, J.M.; Basak, C.; Pena, L.D.; Goldstein, S.L. Rare earth element and neodymium isotopes of the eastern US GEOTRACES Equatorial Pacific Zonal Transect (GP16). Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2021, 576, 117233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lagarde, M.; Pham, V.Q.; Lherminier, P.; Belhadj, M.; Jeandel, C. Rare earth elements in the North Atlantic, part I: Non-conservative behavior reveals margin inputs and deep waters scavenging. Chem. Geol. 2024, 664, 122230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Stichel, T.; Frank, M.; Rickli, J.; Hathorne, E.C.; Haley, B.A.; Jeandel, C.; Pradoux, C. Sources and input mechanisms of hafnium and neodymium in surface waters of the Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2012, 94, 22–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zheng, X.-Y.; Plancherel, Y.; Saito, M.A.; Scott, P.M.; Henderson, G.M. Rare earth elements (REEs) in the tropical South Atlantic and quantitative deconvolution of their non-conservative behavior. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2016, 177, 217–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Crocket, K.C.; Hill, E.; Abell, R.E.; Johnson, C.; Gary, S.F.; Brand, T.; Hathorne, E.C. Rare earth element distribution in the NE Atlantic: Evidence for benthic sources, longevity of the seawater signal, and biogeochemical cycling. Front. Mar. Sci. 2018, 5, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Amakawa, H.; Alibo, D.S.; Nozaki, Y. Nd isotopic composition and REE pattern in the surface waters of the eastern Indian Ocean and its adjacent seas. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2000, 64, 1715–1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Paffrath, R.; Pahnke, K.; Böning, P.; Rutgers van der Loeff, M.; Valk, O.; Gdaniec, S.; Planquette, H. Seawater-Particle Interactions of Rare Earth Elements and Neodymium Isotopes in the Deep Central Arctic Ocean. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 2021, 126, e2021JC017423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Laukert, G.; Frank, M.; Bauch, D.; Hathorne, E.C.; Rabe, B.; von Appen, W.-J.; Wegner, C.; Zieringer, M.; Kassens, H. Ocean circulation and freshwater pathways in the Arctic Mediterranean based on a combined Nd isotope, REE and oxygen isotope section across Fram Strait. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2017, 202, 285–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Takaya, Y.; Yasukawa, K.; Kawasaki, T.; Fujinaga, K.; Ohta, J.; Usui, Y.; Nakamura, K.; Kimura, J.-I.; Chang, Q.; Hamada, M. The tremendous potential of deep-sea mud as a source of rare-earth elements. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 5763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Nakamura, K.; Fujinaga, K.; Yasukawa, K.; Takaya, Y.; Ohta, J.; Machida, S.; Haraguchi, S.; Kato, Y. REY-Rich Mud: A Deep-Sea Mineral Resource for Rare Earths and Yttrium. Handb. Phys. Chem. Rare Earths 2015, 46, 79–127. [Google Scholar]
  49. Iijima, K.; Yasukawa, K.; Fujinaga, K.; Nakamura, K.; Machida, S.; Takaya, Y.; Ohta, J.; Haraguchi, S.; Nishio, Y.; Usui, Y. Discovery of extremely REY-rich mud in the western North Pacific Ocean. Geochem. J. 2016, 50, 557–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yasukawa, K.; Liu, H.; Fujinaga, K.; Machida, S.; Haraguchi, S.; Ishii, T.; Nakamura, K.; Kato, Y. Geochemistry and mineralogy of REY-rich mud in the eastern Indian Ocean. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2014, 93, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yasukawa, K.; Kino, S.; Ohta, J.; Azami, K.; Tanaka, E.; Mimura, K.; Fujinaga, K.; Nakamura, K.; Kato, Y. Stratigraphic variations of Fe–Mn micronodules and implications for the formation of extremely REY-rich mud in the western North Pacific Ocean. Minerals 2021, 11, 270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yasukawa, K.; Nakamura, K.; Fujinaga, K.; Machida, S.; Kato, Y. Rare-earth, major, and trace element geochemistry of deep-sea sediments in the Indian Ocean: Implications for the potential distribution of REY-rich mud in the Indian Ocean. Geochem. J. 2015, 49, 621–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yasukawa, K.; Ohta, J.; Miyazaki, T.; Vaglarov, B.S.; Chang, Q.; Ueki, K.; Toyama, C.; Kimura, J.I.; Tanaka, E.; Nakamura, K. Statistic and Isotopic Characterization of Deep-Sea Sediments in the Western North Pacific Ocean: Implications for Genesis of the Sediment Extremely Enriched in Rare Earth Elements. Geochem. Geophys. Geosystems 2019, 20, 3402–3430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Shi, X.F.; Bi, D.J.; Huang, M.; Yu, M.; Luo, Y.; Zhou, T.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, J. Distribution and metallogenesis of deep-sea area rare earth elements. Geol. Bull. China 2021, 40, 195–208. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  55. Fujinaga, K.; Yasukawa, K.; Nakamura, K.; Machida, S.; Kato, Y. Geochemistry of REY-rich mud in the Japanese Exclusive Economic Zone around Minamitorishima Island. Geochem. J. 2016, 50, 575–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhou, T.; Shi, X.; Huang, M.; Yu, M.; Bi, D.; Ren, X.; Yang, G.; Zhu, A. The Influence of Hydrothermal Fluids on the REY-Rich Deep-Sea Sediments in the Yupanqui Basin, Eastern South Pacific Ocean: Constraints from Bulk Sediment Geochemistry and Mineralogical Characteristics. Minerals 2020, 10, 1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wu, J.; Wells, M.L.; Rember, R. Dissolved iron anomaly in the deep tropical–subtropical Pacific: Evidence for long-range transport of hydrothermal iron. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2015, 75, 460–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Xiang, B.; Dong, Y.; Han, X.; Li, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Chu, F. Enrichment of smectite in the REY-rich mud of the Clarion-Clipperton Fracture Zone in the eastern Pacific and its geological significance. Geochem. Geophys. Geosystems 2024, 25, e2023GC011283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Koschinsky, A.; Halbach, P. Sequential leaching of marine ferromanganese precipitates: Genetic implications. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1995, 59, 5113–5132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Owen, R.M.; Olivarez, A.M. Geochemistry of rare earth elements in Pacific hydrothermal sediments. Mar. Chem. 1988, 25, 183–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Schijf, J.; Byrne, R.H. Speciation of yttrium and the rare earth elements in seawater: Review of a 20-year analytical journey. Chem. Geol. 2021, 584, 120479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Du, J.; Haley, B.A.; Mix, A.C.; Abbott, A.N.; Manus, J.M.; Vance, D. Reactive-transport modeling of neodymium and its radiogenic isotope in deep-sea sediments: The roles of authigenesis, marine silicate weathering and reverse weathering. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. Lett. J. Devoted Dev. Time Earth Planet. Syst. 2022, 596, 117792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Li, X.; Liang, X.; He, H.; Li, J.; Ma, L.; Tan, W.; Zhong, Y.; Zhu, J.; Zhou, M.-F.; Dong, H. Microorganisms accelerate REE mineralization in supergene environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2022, 88, e00632-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Yu, M.; Shi, X.; Huang, M.; Liu, J.; Yan, Q.; Yang, G.; Li, C.; Yang, B.; Zhou, T.; Bi, D.; et al. The transfer of rare earth elements during early diagenesis in REY-rich sediments: An example from the Central Indian Ocean Basin. Ore Geol. Rev. 2021, 136, 104269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ohta, J.; Yasukawa, K.; Nakamura, K.; Fujinaga, K.; Iijima, K.; Kato, Y. Geological features and resource potential of deep-sea mud highly enriched in rare-earth elements in the Central Pacific Basin and the Penrhyn Basin. Ore Geol. Rev. 2021, 139, 104440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bi, D.; Shi, X.; Huang, M.; Yu, M.; Fang, X. Geochemical and mineralogical characteristics of deep-sea sediments from the western North Pacific Ocean: Constraints on the enrichment processes of rare earth elements. Ore Geol. Rev. 2021, 104318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ren, J.; Liu, Y.; Wang, F.; He, G.; Deng, X.; Wei, Z.; Yao, H. Mechanism and influencing factors of REY enrichment in deep-sea sediments. Minerals 2021, 11, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Liao, J.; Chen, J.; Sun, X.; Wu, Z.; Deng, Y.; Shi, X.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Koschinsky, A. Quantifying the controlling mineral phases of rare-earth elements in deep-sea pelagic sediments. Chem. Geol. 2022, 595, 120792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Liao, J.; Sun, X.; Li, D.; Sa, R.; Lu, Y.; Lin, Z.; Xu, L.; Zhan, R.; Pan, Y.; Xu, H. New insights into nanostructure and geochemistry of bioapatite in REE-rich deep-sea sediments: LA-ICP-MS, TEM, and Z-contrast imaging studies. Chem. Geol. 2019, 512, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ohta, J.; Yasukawa, K.; Machida, S.; Fujinaga, K.; Kato, Y. Geological factors responsible for REY-rich mud in the western North Pacific Ocean: Implications from mineralogy and grain size distributions. Geochem. J. 2016, 50, 591–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zhou, T.; Shi, X.; Huang, M.; Yu, M.; Shi, M. Genesis of REY-rich deep-sea sediments in the Tiki Basin, eastern South Pacific Ocean: Evidence from geochemistry, mineralogy and isotope systematics. Ore Geol. Rev. 2021, 138, 104330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kon, Y.; Hoshino, M.; Sanematsu, K.; Morita, S.; Takagi, T. Geochemical Characteristics of Apatite in Heavy REE-rich Deep-Sea Mud from Minami-Torishima Area, Southeastern Japan. Resour. Geol. 2014, 64, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Liu, Y.; Jing, Y.; Zhao, W. Distribution of rare earth elements and implication for Ce anomalies in the clay-sized minerals of deep-sea sediment, Western Pacific Ocean. Appl. Clay Sci. 2023, 235, 106876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zhang, L.; Algeo, T.J.; Cao, L.; Zhao, L.; Chen, Z.Q.; Li, Z. Diagenetic uptake of rare earth elements by conodont apatite. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2016, 458, 176–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Elderfield, H. The Oceans and Marine Geochemistry; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006; Volume 6. [Google Scholar]
  76. Bradbury, M.H.; Baeyens, B. Sorption of Eu on Na- and Ca-montmorillonites: Experimental investigations and modelling with cation exchange and surface complexation. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2002, 66, 2325–2334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Cai, Y.C.; Shi, X.; Zhou, T.; Huang, M.; Yu, M.; Zhang, Y.; Bi, D.; Zhu, A.; Fang, X. Evaluating the contribution of hydrothermal fluids and clay minerals to the enrichment of rare earth elements and yttrium (REY) in deep-sea sediments. Ore Geol. Rev. 2023, 161, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Chen, J.; Algeo, T.J.; Zhao, L.; Chen, Z.Q.; Cao, L.; Zhang, L.; Li, Y. Diagenetic uptake of rare earth elements by bioapatite, with an example from Lower Triassic conodonts of South China. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2015, 149, 181–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Abbott, A.N.; Lhr, S.; Trethewy, M. Are Clay Minerals the Primary Control on the Oceanic Rare Earth Element Budget. Front. Mar. Sci. 2019, 6, 504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Hein, J.R.; Mizell, K.; Koschinsky, A.; Conrad, T.A. Deep-ocean mineral deposits as a source of critical metals for high- and green-technology applications: Comparison with land-based resources. Ore Geol. Rev. 2013, 51, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Takahashi, Y.; Hayasaka, Y.; Morita, K.; Kashiwabara, T.; Nakada, R.; Marcus, M.A.; Kato, K.; Tanaka, K.; Shimizu, H. Transfer of rare earth elements (REE) from manganese oxides to phosphates during early diagenesis in pelagic sediments inferred from REE patterns, X-ray absorption spectroscopy, and chemical leaching method. Geochem. J. 2015, 49, 653–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Lagarde, M.; Lemaitre, N.; Planquette, H.; Grenier, M.; Jeandel, C. Particulate Rare Earth Element behavior in the North Atlantic (GEOVIDE cruise). Biogeosciences 2020, 17, 5539–5561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Soli, A.L.; Byrne, R.H. Europium silicate complexation at 25 °C and 0.7 molar ionic strength. Mar. Chem. 2017, 195, 138–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Picone, N.; den Camp, H.J.O. Role of rare earth elements in methanol oxidation. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2019, 49, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Jalali, J.; Lebeau, T. The Role of Microorganisms in Mobilization and Phytoextraction of Rare Earth Elements: A Review. Front. Environ. Sci. 2021, 9, 688430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ohnuki, T.; Jiang, M.; Sakamoto, F.; Kozai, N.; Yamasaki, S.; Yu, Q.; Tanaka, K.; Utsunomiya, S.; Xia, X.; Yang, K. Sorption of trivalent cerium by a mixture of microbial cells and manganese oxides: Effect of microbial cells on the oxidation of trivalent cerium. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2015, 163, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Takahashi, Y.; Châtellier, X.; Hattori, K.H.; Kato, K.; Fortin, D. Adsorption of rare earth elements onto bacterial cell walls and its implication for REE sorption onto natural microbial mats. Chem. Geol. 2005, 219, 53–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Tsuruta, T. Selective accumulation of light or heavy rare earth elements using gram-positive bacteria. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2006, 52, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Park, D.; Middleton, A.; Smith, R.; Deblonde, G.; Laudal, D.; Theaker, N.; Hsu-Kim, H.; Jiao, Y. A biosorption-based approach for selective extraction of rare earth elements from coal byproducts. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 241, 116726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Jiang, M.; Ohnuki, T.; Tanaka, K.; Kozai, N.; Kamiishi, E.; Utsunomiya, S. Post-adsorption process of Yb phosphate nano-particle formation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2012, 93, 30–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Jiang, M.; Ohnuki, T.; Utsunomiya, S. Biomineralization of middle rare earth element samarium in yeast and bacteria systems. Geomicrobiol. J. 2018, 35, 375–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Di Caprio, F.; Altimari, P.; Zanni, E.; Uccelletti, D.; Toro, L.; Pagnanelli, F. Lanthanum biosorption by different Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2016, 49, 37–42. [Google Scholar]
  93. Shi, S.; Pan, J.; Dong, B.; Zhou, W.; Zhou, C. Bioleaching of rare earth elements: Perspectives from mineral characteristics and microbial species. Minerals 2023, 13, 1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Cui, H.; Wang, F.; Ma, C.; Zhang, H.; Liu, K. Microbial-driven fabrication of rare earth materials. Sci. China Mater. 2024, 67, 2376–2392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Cui, H.; Zhang, X.; Chen, J.; Qian, X.; Zhong, Y.; Ma, C.; Zhang, H.; Liu, K. The construction of a microbial synthesis system for rare earth enrichment and material applications. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2303457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Breuker, A.; Ritter, S.F.; Schippers, A. Biosorption of rare earth elements by different microorganisms in acidic solutions. Metals 2020, 10, 954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Goldeinstein, J.P.N.; Bassin, J.P. Biosorption as a Strategy for the Recovery of Rare Earth Elements. Biosorption Wastewater Contam. 2022, 201–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Dev, S.; Sachan, A.; Dehghani, F.; Ghosh, T.; Briggs, B.R.; Aggarwal, S. Mechanisms of biological recovery of rare-earth elements from industrial and electronic wastes: A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 397, 124596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Macaskie, L.E.; Yong, P.; Paterson-Beedle, M.; Thackray, A.C.; Marquis, P.M.; Sammons, R.L.; Nott, K.P.; Hall, L.D. A novel non line-of-sight method for coating hydroxyapatite onto the surfaces of support materials by biomineralization. J. Biotechnol. 2005, 118, 187–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Roszczenko-Jasińska, P.; Vu, H.N.; Subuyuj, G.A.; Crisostomo, R.V.; Cai, J.; Lien, N.F.; Clippard, E.J.; Ayala, E.M.; Ngo, R.T.; Yarza, F. Gene products and processes contributing to lanthanide homeostasis and methanol metabolism in Methylorubrum extorquens AM1. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 12663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Sallam, A.; Amin, M.; Elaassy, I.E.; El-Feky, H.; Nada, A.; Harpy, N. Biosorption of Rare Earth Elements by Two Fungal Genera from Lower Carboniferous Carbonaceous Shales, Southwestern Sinai, Egypt. J. Appl. Environ. Biol. Sci. 2014, 4, 146–154. [Google Scholar]
  102. Giese, E.C.; Dekker, R.F.H.; Barbosa-Dekker, A.M. Biosorption of lanthanum and samarium by viable and autoclaved mycelium of Botryosphaeria rhodina MAMB-05. Biotechnol. Prog. 2019, 35, e2783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Vlachou, A.; Symeopoulos, B.D.; Koutinas, A.A. A comparative study of neodymium sorption by yeast cells. Int. J. Chem. Asp. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 2009, 97, 437–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Korenevsky, A.A.; Sorokin, V.V.; Karavaiko, G. Biosorption of rare earth elements. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 1998, 19, 341–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Jiang, M. Biological nano-mineralization of Ce phosphate by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Chem. Geol. 2010, 277, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Shuxia, X.U.; Zhang, S.; Chen, K.; Han, J.; Kun, W.U. Biosorption of La3+ and Ce3+ by Agrobacterium sp. HN1. J. Rare Earths 2011, 29, 265–270. [Google Scholar]
  107. Park, D.M.; Reed, D.W.; Yung, M.C.; Eslamimanesh, A.; Lencka, M.M.; Anderko, A.; Fujita, Y.; Riman, R.E.; Navrotsky, A.; Jiao, Y. Bioadsorption of Rare Earth Elements through Cell Surface Display of Lanthanide Binding Tags. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 2735–2742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Mohammadi, M.; Reinicke, B.; Wawrousek, K. Biosorption and biomagnetic recovery of La3+ by Magnetospirillum magneticum AMB-1 biomass. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2022, 303, 122140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Cotruvo, J.A., Jr.; Featherston, E.R.; Mattocks, J.A.; Ho, J.V.; Laremore, T.N. Lanmodulin: A highly selective lanthanide-binding protein from a lanthanide-utilizing bacterium. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 15056–15061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Texier, A.C.; Andrès, Y.; Cloirec, P.L. Selective biosorption of lanthanide (La, Eu, Yb) ions by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33, 489–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Cheng, Y.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, L.; Ke, Z.; Kovarik, L.; Dong, H. Resource Recovery: Adsorption and Biomineralization of Cerium by Bacillus licheniformis. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 426, 127844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Pan, X.; Wu, W.; Lü, J.; Chen, Z.; Li, L.; Rao, W.; Guan, X. Biosorption and extraction of europium by Bacillus thuringiensis strain. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2017, 75, 21–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Ma, J.; Li, S.; Wang, J.; Jiang, S.; Panchal, B.; Sun, Y. Bioleaching rare earth elements from coal fly ash by Aspergillus niger. Fuel 2023, 354, 129387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Bahaloo-Horeh, N.; Mousavi, S.M. A novel green strategy for biorecovery of valuable elements along with enrichment of rare earth elements from activated spent automotive catalysts using fungal metabolites. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 430, 128509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Shen, L.; Zhou, H.; Shi, Q.; Meng, X.; Zhao, Y.; Qiu, G.; Zhang, X.; Yu, H.; He, X.; He, H. Comparative chemical and non-contact bioleaching of ion-adsorption type rare earth ore using ammonium sulfate and metabolites of Aspergillus niger and Yarrowia lipolytica to rationalise the role of organic acids for sustainable processing. Hydrometallurgy 2023, 216, 106019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Castro, L.; Gómez-lvarez, H.; González, F.; Muoz, J. Biorecovery of rare earth elements from fluorescent lamp powder using the fungus Aspergillus niger in batch and semicontinuous systems. Miner. Eng. 2017, 75, 21–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Zhou, H.; Wang, J.; Yu, X.; Kang, J.; Qiu, G.; Zhao, H.; Shen, L. Effective extraction of rare earth elements from ion-adsorption type rare earth ore by three bioleaching methods. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024, 330, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Brisson, V.L.; Zhuang, W.Q.; Alvarez-Cohen, L. Bioleaching of rare earth elements from monazite sand. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2016, 113, 339–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Barnett, M.J.; Palumbo-Roe, B.; Deady, E.A.; Gregory, S.P. Comparison of Three Approaches for Bioleaching of Rare Earth Elements from Bauxite. Minerals 2020, 10, 649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Park, S.; Liang, Y. Bioleaching of trace elements and rare earth elements from coal fly ash. Int. J. Coal Sci. Technol. 2019, 6, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Maes, S.; Zhuang, W.Q.; Rabaey, K.; Alvarez-Cohen, L.; Hennebel, T. Concomitant Leaching and Electrochemical Extraction of Rare Earth Elements from Monazite. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 1654–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Ilyas, S.; Kim, H.; Srivastava, R.R. Feasibility of the Bio-Mobilization of Rare Earth Elements from Bauxite Residual Red Mud. Environ. Sci. Proc. 2021, 6, 5. [Google Scholar]
  123. Qu, Y.; Lian, B. Bioleaching of rare earth and radioactive elements from red mud using Penicillium tricolor RM-10. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 136, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Corbett, M.K.; Eksteen, J.J.; Xi-Zhi, N.; Watkin, E.L.J. Syntrophic effect of indigenous and inoculated microorganisms in the leaching of rare earth elements from Western Australian monazite. Res. Microbiol. 2018, 169, 558–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Doyun, S.; Jiwoong, K.; Byung-Su, K.; Jinki, J.; Jae-Chun, L. Use of Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria to Leach Rare Earth Elements from Monazite-Bearing Ore. Minerals 2015, 5, 189–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Qu, Y.; Li, H.; Wang, X.; Tian, W.; Zhang, Y. Bioleaching of Major, Rare Earth, and Radioactive Elements from Red Mud by using Indigenous Chemoheterotrophic Bacterium Acetobacter sp. Minerals 2019, 9, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Kiskira, K.; Lymperopoulou, T.; Tsakanika, L.-A.; Pavlopoulos, C.; Papadopoulou, K.; Ochsenkühn, K.-M.; Lyberatos, G.; Ochsenkühn-Petropoulou, M. Study of Microbial Cultures for the Bioleaching of Scandium from Alumina Industry By-Products. Metals 2021, 11, 951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Zhang, D.R.; Chen, H.R.; Nie, Z.Y.; Xia, J.L.; Li, E.P.; Fan, X.L.; Zheng, L. Extraction of Al and rare earths (Ce, Gd, Sc, Y) from red mud by aerobic and anaerobic bi-stage bioleaching. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 401, 125914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Tian, Y.; Hu, X.; Song, X.; Yang, A. Bioleaching of rare-earth elements from phosphate rock using Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2022, 75, 1111–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Hong, C.; Tang, Q.; Liu, S.; Kim, H.; Liu, D. A two-step bioleaching process enhanced the recovery of rare earth elements from phosphogypsum. Hydrometallurgy 2023, 221, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Hosseini, S.M.; Vakilchap, F.; Baniasadi, M.; Mousavi, S.; Darban, A.K.; Farnaud, S. Green recovery of cerium and strontium from gold mine tailings using an adapted acidophilic bacterium in one-step bioleaching approach. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2022, 138, 104482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Homayoun, F.; Hackett, M.J.; Khaleque, H.N.; Eksteen, J.J.; Kaksonen, A.H.; Watkin, E.L.J. Better together: Potential of co-culture microorganisms to enhance bioleaching of rare earth elements from monazite. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2018, 3, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Su, H.F.; Tan, F.; Lin, J.F. An integrated approach combines hydrothermal chemical and biological treatment to enhance recycle of rare metals from coal fly ash. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 395, 124640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Tayar, S.P.; Palmieri, M.C.; Bevilaqua, D. Sulfuric acid bioproduction and its application in rare earth extraction from phosphogypsum. Miner. Eng. 2022, 185, 107662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. García-Balboa, C.; Martínez-Alesón García, P.; López-Rodas, V.; Costas, E.; Baselga-Cervera, B. Microbial biominers: Sequential bioleaching and biouptake of metals from electronic scraps. MicrobiologyOpen 2022, 11, e1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Hussien, S.S. Bioleaching of some Rare Earth Elements from Egyptian Monazite using Aspergillus ficuum and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Walailak J. Sci. Technol. 2014, 11, 809–823. [Google Scholar]
  137. Castro, L.; Gómez-lvarez, H.; Carmona, M.; González, F.; Muoz, J.A. Influence of biosurfactants in the recovery of REE from monazite using Burkholderia thailandensis. Hydrometallurgy 2023, 222, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Nathan, V.; Dorte, F.; Derik, W.; Harrison, S.T.L.; Athanasios, K.; Mark, D. Toward the bioleaching of bauxite residue by Gluconobacter oxydans. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2024, 135, lxae279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Aston, J.E.; Thompson, V.S.; Fujita, Y.; Reed, D.W. Metabolic flux modeling of Gluconobacter oxydans enables improved production of bioleaching organic acids. Process Biochem. 2022, 122, 350–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Schmitz, A.M.; Pian, B.; Medin, S.; Reid, M.C.; Wu, M.; Gazel, E.; Barstow, B. Generation of a Gluconobacter oxydans knockout collection for improved extraction of rare earth elements. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 6693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Issayeva, A.U.; Pankiewicz, R.; Otarbekova, A.A. Bioleaching of Metals from Wastes of Phosphoric Fertilizers Production. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2020, 29, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Barnett, M.J.; Palumbo-Roe, B.; Gregory, S.P. Comparison of heterotrophic bioleaching and ammonium sulfate ion exchange leaching of rare earth elements from a Madagascan ion-adsorption clay. Minerals 2018, 8, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Zhang, L.; Dong, H.; Liu, Y.; Bian, L.; Wang, X.; Zhou, Z.; Huang, Y. Bioleaching of rare earth elements from bastnaesite-bearing rock by actinobacteria. Chem. Geol. 2018, 483, 544–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Zabochnicka-Swiatek, M.; Krzywonos, M. Potentials of Biosorption and Bioaccumulation Processes for Heavy Metal Removal. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2014, 23, 551–561. [Google Scholar]
  145. Macmillan, G.A.; Chételat, J.; Heath, J.P.; Mickpegak, R.; Amyot, M. Rare earth elements in freshwater, marine, and terrestrial ecosystems in the eastern Canadian Arctic. Env. Sci. Process. Impacts 2017, 19, 1336–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Strady, E.; Kim, I.; Radakovitch, O.; Kim, G. Rare earth element distributions and fractionation in plankton from the northwestern Mediterranean Sea. Chemosphere 2015, 119, 72–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Fischer, C.B.; Krsten, S.; Rsken, L.M.; Cappel, F.; Beresko, C.; Ankerhold, G.; Schnleber, A.; Geimer, S.; Ecker, D.; Wehner, S. Cyanobacterial promoted enrichment of rare earth elements europium, samarium and neodymium and intracellular europium particle formation. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 32581–32593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Khan, A.M.; Bakar, N.K.A.; Bakar, A.F.A.; Ashraf, M.A. Chemical speciation and bioavailability of rare earth elements (REEs) in the ecosystem: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 22764–22789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Řezanka, T.; Kaineder, K.; Mezricky, D.; Řezanka, M.; Bišová, K.i.; Zachleder, V.; Vítová, M. The effect of lanthanides on photosynthesis, growth, and chlorophyll profile of the green alga Desmodesmus quadricauda. Photosynth. Res. 2016, 130, 335–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Guo, P.; Wang, J.; Li, X.; Zhu, J.; Reinert, T.; Heitmann, J.; Spemann, D.; Vogt, J.; Flagmeyer, R.-H.; Butz, T. Study of metal bioaccumulation by nuclear microprobe analysis of algae fossils and living algae cells. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. At. 2000, 161, 801–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Shen, H.; Ren, Q.G.; Mi, Y.; Shi, X.F.; Liu, B. Investigation of metal ion accumulation in Euglena gracilis by fluorescence methods. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. 2002, 189, 506–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Byrne; Robert, H.; Patten; James, T. Assessment of Fe(III) and Eu(III) complexation by silicate in aqueous solutions. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta J. Geochem. Soc. Meteorit. Soc. 2017, 202, 361–373. [Google Scholar]
  153. Pałasz, A.; Czekaj, P. Toxicological and cytophysiological aspects of lanthanides action. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2000, 47, 1107–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Voutsinos, M.Y.; Banfield, J.F.; McClelland, H.-L.O. Extensive and diverse lanthanide-dependent metabolism in the ocean. ISME J. 2025, 19, wraf057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Reitz, Z.L.; Medema, M.H. Genome mining strategies for metallophore discovery. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2022, 77, 102757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Good, N.M.; Vu, H.N.; Suriano, C.J.; Subuyuj, G.A.; Skovran, E.; Martinez-Gomez, N.C. Pyrroloquinoline Quinone Ethanol Dehydrogenase in Methylobacterium extorquens AM1 Extends Lanthanide-Dependent Metabolism to Multicarbon Substrates. J. Bacteriol. 2016, 198, 3109–3118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Jahn, B.; Pol, A.; Lumpe, H.; Barends, T.R.M.; Dietl, A.; Hogendoorn, C.; Opdencamp, P.H.J.M.; Daumann, P.L.J. Similar but Not the Same: First Kinetic and Structural Analyses of a Methanol Dehydrogenase Containing a Europium Ion in the Active Site. Wiley-Blackwell Online Open 2018, 19, 1147–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Pol, A.; Barends, T.R.; Dietl, A.; Khadem, A.F.; Eygensteyn, J.; Jetten, M.S.; Op den Camp, H.J. Rare earth metals are essential for methanotrophic life in volcanic mudpots. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 16, 255–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Fitriyanto, N.A.; Fushimi, M.; Matsunaga, M.; Pertiwiningrum, A.; Iwama, T.; Kawai, K. Molecular structure and gene analysis of Ce3+-induced methanol dehydrogenase of Bradyrhizobium sp. MAFF211645. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2011, 111, 613–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Jing, H.; Zheng, Y.; Ludmila, C. Lanthanide-Dependent Methanol Dehydrogenases of XoxF4 and XoxF5 Clades Are Differentially Distributed Among Methylotrophic Bacteria and They Reveal Different Biochemical Properties. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1366. [Google Scholar]
  161. Hibi, Y.; Asai, K.; Arafuka, H.; Hamajima, M.; Iwama, T.; Kawai, K. Molecular structure of La3+-induced methanol dehydrogenase-like protein in Methylobacterium radiotolerans. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2011, 111, 547–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Wehrmann, M.; Billard, P.; Martin-Meriadec, A.; Zegeye, A.; Klebensberger, J. Functional Role of Lanthanides in Enzymatic Activity and Transcriptional Regulation of Pyrroloquinoline Quinone-Dependent Alcohol Dehydrogenases in Pseudomonas putida KT2440. Mbio 2017, 8, e00570-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Arienzo, M.; Ferrara, L.; Trifuoggi, M.; Toscanesi, M. Advances in the Fate of Rare Earth Elements, REE, in Transitional Environments: Coasts and Estuaries. Water 2022, 14, 401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Good, N.M.; Walser, O.N.; Moore, R.S.; Suriano, C.J.; Martinez-Gomez, N.C. Investigation of lanthanide-dependent methylotrophy uncovers complementary roles for alcohol dehydrogenase enzymes. Cold Spring Harb. Lab. 2018, 329011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Ochsner, A.M.; Hemmerle, L.; Vonderach, T.; Nüssli, R.; Bortfeld-Miller, M.; Hattendorf, B.; Vorholt, J.A. Use of rare-earth elements in the phyllosphere colonizer Methylobacterium extorquens PA1. Mol. Microbiol. 2019, 111, 1152–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Soleimanifar, M.; Rodriguez-Freire, L. Biointeraction of cerium oxide and neodymium oxide nanoparticles with pure culture Methylobacterium extorquens AM1. Chemosphere 2023, 335, 139113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Auerbach, R.; Bokelmann, K.; Stauber, R.; Gutfleisch, O.; Schnell, S.; Ratering, S. Critical raw materials—Advanced recycling technologies and processes: Recycling of rare earth metals out of end of life magnets by bioleaching with various bacteria as an example of an intelligent recycling strategy. Miner. Eng. 2019, 134, 104–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Jung, H.; Su, Z.; Inaba, Y.; West, A.C.; Banta, S. Genetic Modification of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans for Rare-Earth Element Recovery under Acidic Conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 19902–19911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Zhao, C.; Wang, J.; Hu, S.; Zhang, R.; Yang, B.; Liu, Y.; Qiu, G. Efficient recovery of rare earth elements from ion-adsorption rare earth tailings: Based on the addition of pyrite calcination modification. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2025, 356, 129767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Fathollahzadeh, H.; Eksteen, J.J.; Kaksonen, A.H.; Watkin, E.L.J. Role of microorganisms in bioleaching of rare earth elements from primary and secondary resources. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 1043–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Keekan, K.K.; Jalondhara, J.C.; Abhilash. Extraction of Ce and Th from Monazite Using REE Tolerant Aspergillus niger. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 2017, 38, 312–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Castro, L.; Blázquez, M.L.; González, F.; Muoz, J.A. Bioleaching of Phosphate Minerals Using Aspergillus niger: Recovery of Copper and Rare Earth Elements. Metals 2020, 10, 978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Marine REY cycle and microbial activities. Red arrows indicate REY transfer; green color represents processes potentially involving microorganisms; blue denotes seawater; deep yellow indicates deep-sea sediments; black dots represent the sedimentary REY. Question marks highlight the study of ongoing scientific uncertainty. This figure was made based on references [3,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15].
Figure 1. Marine REY cycle and microbial activities. Red arrows indicate REY transfer; green color represents processes potentially involving microorganisms; blue denotes seawater; deep yellow indicates deep-sea sediments; black dots represent the sedimentary REY. Question marks highlight the study of ongoing scientific uncertainty. This figure was made based on references [3,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15].
Jmse 13 01471 g001
Figure 3. Mechanisms of REY–microorganisms interaction. Biosorption: Diagram shows various REY biosorption mechanisms, including ion-exchange, precipitation, electrostatic interaction, complexation, and chelation. Bioaccumulation and Utilization: different color dots represent REY accumulated in various cellular compartments, EDH and MDH are examples of REY-dependent enzymes. Bioleaching: REY can be mobilized into aqueous phase through ① redoxolysis, ② acidolysis, and ③ complexolysis bioleaching methods to aqueous phase. Abbreviations: Ln—lanthanide; MDH—methanol dehydrogenase; EDH—ethanol dehydrogenase; EPS—extracellular polymers. This figure was made according to references [11,12,13,15,82,83,84,85].
Figure 3. Mechanisms of REY–microorganisms interaction. Biosorption: Diagram shows various REY biosorption mechanisms, including ion-exchange, precipitation, electrostatic interaction, complexation, and chelation. Bioaccumulation and Utilization: different color dots represent REY accumulated in various cellular compartments, EDH and MDH are examples of REY-dependent enzymes. Bioleaching: REY can be mobilized into aqueous phase through ① redoxolysis, ② acidolysis, and ③ complexolysis bioleaching methods to aqueous phase. Abbreviations: Ln—lanthanide; MDH—methanol dehydrogenase; EDH—ethanol dehydrogenase; EPS—extracellular polymers. This figure was made according to references [11,12,13,15,82,83,84,85].
Jmse 13 01471 g003
Table 1. Characteristics of deep-sea metallogenic belts.
Table 1. Characteristics of deep-sea metallogenic belts.
Deep-Sea REY Metallogenic Belts Western PacificSoutheast
Pacific
Central-Eastern PacificCentral Indian Ocean BasinWharton Basin
Main sediment typesDeep-sea clay (zeolite clay and oceanic clay)Deep-sea clay (zeolite clay and oceanic clay)Deep-sea clay (zeolite clay and oceanic clay)Deep-sea clay (zeolite clay and oceanic clay)Deep-sea clay (zeolite clay and oceanic clay)
Main mineral phasesBiogenic apatite, Fe-Mn micronodulesBiogenic apatite, Fe-Mn micronodulesBiogenic apatite, Fe-Mn micronodulesBiogenic apatite, Fe-Mn micronodulesBiogenic apatite, Fe-Mn micronodules
ΣREY range (10−6 μg/g)700–7974700–2738700–1732700–1987700–1113
ΣREY average (10−6 μg/g)133012439101120815
REY enrichment depth2–12 m (3 layers ΣREY > 2000 × 10−6)0–10 m0–64 m (multilayer) 0–5 m103–122 m
The table is cited from reference [54] and modified manually.
Table 3. Enzymes in microorganisms identified as REY-dependent.
Table 3. Enzymes in microorganisms identified as REY-dependent.
CategoryStrainEnzyme/ProteinInteracted REYReferences
NMethylacidiphilum fumariolicum SolVMDH XoxFLa3+, Ce3+, Pr3+, Nd3+, Eu3+, Lu3+[157,158]
NMethylorubrum extorquens AM1EDH ExaF, MDH XoxF1, Lanmodulin La3+, Nd3+, Ln3+[109,156,164,165,166]
NBradyrhizobium sp.MDH XoxFCe3+[159]
NMethylotenera mobilis JLW8MDH XoxF4-1/XoxF4-2Ce3+[160]
NMethylomonas sp. LW13MDH XoxF5Ce3+[160]
NMethylobacterium radiotoleransMDH XoxFLa3+[161]
NPseudomonas putidaEDH PedH La3+, Ce3+, Pr3+, Sm3+, Nd3+[162]
——Marine microorganism metagenome MDH, EDH, putative SDH and GDHLREY[154]
N: Gram-negative bacteria; —— mixed metagenome data, no specific category; MDH: methanol dehydrogenase; EDH: ethanol dehydrogenase; SDH: sorbose dehydrogenase; GDH: glucose dehydrogenase.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, S.; Deng, Y. Marine Rare Earth Elements: Distribution Patterns, Enrichment Mechanisms and Microbial Interactions. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2025, 13, 1471. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13081471

AMA Style

Liu S, Deng Y. Marine Rare Earth Elements: Distribution Patterns, Enrichment Mechanisms and Microbial Interactions. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2025; 13(8):1471. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13081471

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Shun, and Yinan Deng. 2025. "Marine Rare Earth Elements: Distribution Patterns, Enrichment Mechanisms and Microbial Interactions" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 13, no. 8: 1471. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13081471

APA Style

Liu, S., & Deng, Y. (2025). Marine Rare Earth Elements: Distribution Patterns, Enrichment Mechanisms and Microbial Interactions. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 13(8), 1471. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13081471

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop