Effect of Nonlinear Constitutive Models on Seismic Site Response of Soft Reclaimed Soil Deposits

This study investigates the impact of nonlinear constitutive models on one-dimensional seismic site response analysis (SRA) for soft, reclaimed soil deposits in Saemangeum, South Korea. Two widely used models, MKZ and GQ/H, were applied to three representative soil profiles using the DEEPSOIL program. Ground motions were scaled to bedrock peak ground accelerations (PGAs) corresponding to annual return periods (ARPs) of 1000, 2400, and 4800 years. Seismic response metrics include the ratio of GQ/H to MKZ shear strain, effective PGA (EPGA), and short- and long-term amplification factors (F_a and F_v). The results highlight the critical role of the site-to-motion period ratio (T_g/T_m) in controlling seismic behavior. Compared to the MKZ, the GQ/H model, which features strength correction and improved stiffness retention, predicts lower shear strains and higher surface spectral accelerations, particularly under strong shaking and shallow conditions. Model differences are most pronounced at low T_g/T_m values, where MKZ tends to underestimate amplification and overestimate strain due to its limited ability to reflect site-specific shear strength. Relative to code-based amplification factors, the GQ/H model yields lower short-term estimates, reflecting the disparity between stiff inland reference sites and the soft reclaimed conditions at Saemangeum. These findings emphasize the need for strength-calibrated constitutive models to improve the accuracy of site-specific seismic hazard assessments.