Next Article in Journal
Influence of Rocky Obstacle Sand Bypassing on Embayed Beach Dynamics Using a Reduced-Complexity Shoreline Model
Next Article in Special Issue
Preliminary Biological Assessments of Some Algae Basis Biomaterials
Previous Article in Journal
Correction: Braidotti et al. A Consolidated Linearised Progressive Flooding Simulation Method for Onboard Decision Support. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12, 1367
Previous Article in Special Issue
Microbial Mat Dominated by Amphora spp. and Their Adaptative Strategies in an Arsenic-Rich Brackish Pond
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Discovering the Bathylithology and Bioengineering Organisms of the Punta Coles Marine Natural Reserve, Moquegua, Peru

by
Sheda Méndez-Ancca
1,2,3,4,*,
Renzo Pepe-Victoriano
1,5,
Hebert Hernán Soto Gonzales
4,6,
Juan Luis Ccamapaza Aguilar
4,6,
Yesica Alvarez Meza
3,4,
Marco Antonio Quispe Pacho
7,
Alex Tejada Cáceres
8,
Danny Efraín Baldarrago Centeno
8 and
Jorge González Aguilera
9
1
Facultad de Recursos Naturales Renovables, Universidad Arturo Prat, Iquique 1110939, Chile
2
Programa de Magíster en Acuicultura, Mención en Cultivos de Recursos Hidrobiológicos y Mención en Acuaponía, Facultad de Recursos Naturales Renovables, Universidad Arturo Prat, Arica 1031597, Chile
3
Escuela Profesional de Ingeniería Pesquera, Facultad de Ingeniería y Arquitectura, Universidad Nacional de Moquegua, Ilo 18601, Peru
4
Laboratorio de Biología Molecular y Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional de Moquegua, Ilo 18601, Peru
5
Núcleo de Investigación Aplicada e Innovación en Ciencias Biológicas, Facultad de Recursos Naturales Renovables, Universidad Arturo Prat, Iquique 1110939, Chile
6
Escuela Profesional de Ingeniería Ambiental, Facultad de Ingeniería y Arquitectura, Universidad Nacional de Moquegua, Ilo 18601, Peru
7
Escuela Profesional de Ingeniería de Sistemas, Facultad de Ingeniería y Arquitectura, Universidad Nacional de Moquegua, Ilo 18601, Peru
8
Laboratorio Costero de Ilo—Instituto del Mar del Perú (IMARPE), Ilo 18601, Peru
9
Department of Crop Science, State University of Mato Grosso do Sul, Cassilândia 79540-000, MS, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12(12), 2265; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12122265
Submission received: 27 October 2024 / Revised: 26 November 2024 / Accepted: 3 December 2024 / Published: 10 December 2024

Abstract

:
The Punta Coles Natural Reserve (PCNR), located on the southern coast of the province of Ilo, Moquegua Region, Peru, houses an area rich in marine biodiversity which is composed of natural banks of benthic invertebrates, which constitute the potential and dynamic fishery of commercial interest for artisanal fishermen that impact the area. To mitigate this impact, all stakeholders need to know, understand, value, and balance the dependence of benthic biodiversity with the ecosystem for its preservation and the promotion of sustainable fishing. Along these lines, the components studied are bathymetry, lithology, and the tapestry of bioengineers that make up the reserve’s seabed. Mapping of the complexity of the benthic habitat of the seabed was developed on the basis of an integrated analysis of multibeam bathymetric data, geoscientific information associated with the antecedents of benthic biodiversity of the PCNR, sediment maps of the seabed, subtidal sedimentological texture, and photographic records. The characterization and granulometry of the sediments that make up the PCNR were determined according to the Udden–Wentworth classification criterion (Φ). The utility of the GPSMAP 178C multibeam echosounder for the interpretation of seabed sediments stands out. The kriging interpolation method was used to extrapolate the characteristics of the benthic habitat, which is suitable for large areas of the sea. As a result, three habitats were derived and mapped, and three structures (bioengineers), namely, “subtidal kelps” (Lessonia trabeculata), “mussels” (Aulacomya atra), and “red sea squirt” (Pyura chilensis), were associated mainly with sedimentary rock habitats and mixed substrates. In the sand substrate, these algae were found to a lesser extent. The results show that this study is a conceptual model that summarizes the understanding of ecology and prospects for the sustainability of profitable, ecoefficient fishing activities in the Moquegua Region, Peru.

1. Introduction

There are 232 marine ecoregions organized in 62 provinces and 12 domains worldwide [1]. The coasts of Peru belong to the Guayaquil, Central Peru, and Humboldtian ecoregions, which are characterized by their geomorphology and oceanography, including upwellings, shallow areas, and mangroves [2,3]. These areas of bathilithological diversity give rise to enormous biodiversity, constituting an ecological and economic wealth that contributes 22% of the national gross domestic product (GDP) [4,5]. Therefore, preserving this ecological heritage through the establishment of natural reserves such as Punta Coles (PCNRs) is imperative [6]. Marine reserves have emerged as fundamental instruments for the conservation of biodiversity, the sustainable management of marine ecosystems [7,8,9,10,11] and the mitigation of the effects of climate change [12,13,14,15,16].
The PCNR comprises a marine and terrestrial surface of 3000 hectares. High biological diversity is represented by guano birds, South American sea lions, and diverse hydrobiological resources, some of which act as ecosystem bioengineers [17]. Key structural species include “subtidal kelps” (Lessonia trabeculata Villouta and Santelices, 1986), mantles of “mussels” (Aulacomya atra Molina, 1782), “red sea squirt” (Pyura chilensis Molina, 1782), and barnacle structures (Balanus laevis Bruguière, 1789) [18]. These species perform significant ecological functions as habitat formers [19,20,21,22,23], increasing local diversity by providing protection against predation, shelter from bottom currents, feeding grounds, reproduction sites, larval settlement areas, and invertebrate assemblages [24,25,26,27,28,29,30].
The high productivity and diversity of the Peruvian Sea [3,31,32] face significant threats, including climate change, pollution, and the overexploitation of marine resources [33,34,35,36,37,38], all of which can lead to a decline in local biodiversity [2]. For example, in the PCNR, illegal fishing, such as the harvesting of false abalone, red sea urchins, and limpets, has reduced local populations and disrupted the balance of associated communities because of the inability of stakeholders in the involved sectors to implement an effective protection program [39]. Moreover, the impacts of climate variability, such as the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) event, which reduces upwelling and primary production and generates sea surface temperature anomalies (SSTAs), have led to a decline in the abundance of some commercial resources and ecosystem bioengineers, such as mussels and kelp beds, and, under extreme conditions, have led to massive mortality [40,41,42]. Additionally, the proximity of the PCNR to Pozo Lisas, the main beach of the Ilo Province, makes it susceptible to pollution caused by large amounts of waste (plastic bottles, food scraps, etc.) left by tourists, especially during the summer season. On several occasions, local authorities have been unable to respond promptly, which may negatively affect water quality and habitat, as described for other coastal regions [43,44].
These factors pose significant threats to the ecological health of PCNR, highlighting the critical importance of studies such as this one. Despite progress in mapping these environments, there remains a significant gap in the literature regarding the integration of bathymetric and lithological data from the PCNR seabed with the distribution of structural organisms essential for marine habitat formation and maintenance [45,46]. Since the establishment of the PCNR, only four studies have been published on its biodiversity. Two studies focused on the distribution and behavior of avifauna [47,48], whereas others examined the abundance and composition of benthic communities in the PCNR [49,50]. This limited body of research highlights the need for a more comprehensive understanding of the spatial distribution and ecological roles of key habitat-forming organisms in the reserve.
To address this research gap, our study contributes to the broader ecological and conservation framework through integrative approaches that link the habitat characteristics of the PCNR. While previous research has focused primarily on avifauna and structural species, we integrate bathymetric, lithological, and biological data to create a holistic view of the PCNR. By employing interpolation techniques and species distribution modeling, we aim to predict the distributions of structural organisms that are vital for the health and resilience of marine ecosystems [51]. This approach is particularly relevant for the unique reserve of southern Peru since it is crucial for the maintenance of the ecosystem and existing biodiversity. According to the National Service of Natural Areas Protected by the State SERNANP (RP No. 048-2016-SERNANP), the development of sustainable activities within the PCNR is oriented to the management and sustainable use of resources on the basis of the implementation of technical regulations and adaptive management criteria that ensure their long-term conservation. Furthermore, it is essential to promote environmental awareness activities and ecotourism, promoting an approach that integrates economic development with the protection of ecosystems, thus ensuring the stability of conservation elements.

2. Materials and Methods

The work was carried out in the laboratory of the Professional School of Fisheries Engineering and School of Environmental Engineering of the National University in Peru. The research was carried out for a period of eight months during 2023.

2.1. Study Area

The study area corresponds to the area of Punta Coles, which is located at approximately 17°42′ S latitude and 71°22′ W longitude and belongs to the National Reserve System of Islands, Islets, and Guaneras (RNSIIPG), which is located south of the city of Ilo in the Moquegua Region of Peru.

2.2. Collection of Bathilithological Information

To characterize the geomorphology of the seabed relief of the selected area, bathymetric surveys were carried out aboard a 5Tn artisanal vessel via the echo sounder (Echomap UHD plus 62cv, USA), which integrates GPS (South Galaxy G1, USA) and sounding functions for data collection. with semiautonomous hook-up diving dives and a review of the bibliographic information of the identification and delimitation of natural banks on the southern coast [18]. Information gathering by diving was carried out through equidistant transects (100 m) perpendicular to the coastline, establishing a total of 18 transects (Figure 1).
During the sampling in each transect, a scientific diver traveled a marked headland at 10 m intervals, recording the depth at each point and describing the habitat according to the standards established by Smith et al. [27] for the monitoring of marine habitats. The predominant type of substrate was determined in situ via the following criteria: sand (1), rock (2), and mixed (3) (Figure 2), in line with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) protocol [51] for the classification of marine substrates. In addition, the main habitat structuring organisms, such as L. trabeculata (1), A. atra (2), and P. chilensis [3], were documented following the guidelines of Jones et al. [17] for the identification of key species.
Geographical positions were recorded via the Datum WGS84 projection. The characterization of the subtidal sedimentological texture was based on the information obtained by diving and photographic documentation of each transect, validated according to the Udden–Wentworth classification (Φ), following the Folk method [52].

2.3. Data Processing

The data were reclassified according to the geomorphological characteristics of the area (slope, orientation, and roughness) derived from the digital bathymetric model (MBD), as established in Shepard [53], for the analysis of marine surfaces.
Finally, a digital stratigraphic model (MED) was generated, exported in raster format (TIFF, ASC) with a resolution of 5 m, and aligned with the MBD according to the procedures recommended by the OGC [54]. All information processing was performed via MapSource and ArcGIS software [55] guidelines for geospatial data management.
All information processing was performed via MapSource version 6.16.3, ArcGIS Desktop 10.5, and Maxent software version 3.4.3 in accordance with ESRI guidelines [55] for geospatial data management.

3. Results

3.1. Bathilithological Survey

The sampling results revealed that the dominant substrate at Punta Coles was “rocky”, which was located mainly in shallower areas below the 15 m isobath. The “mixed” substrate (heterogeneous, composed of sand deposits and lithic outcrops) presented a relatively high proportion in the central area of the PCNR and in the vicinity of the rocky island. Moreover, the sandy substrate was located mainly in areas adjacent to Pozo Lizas beach and in deeper areas from the 30 m isobath (Figure 2A).
The width of the rocky platform in the sector in front of the “Guardianía” was approximately 300 m, whereas in the central area, in front of the Lighthouse, it reached 1000 m. In the southern area, adjacent to the Pozo Lizas beach, the rocky coverage presented an extension of less than 100 m. This habitat is closely associated with the distribution of the main benthic resources of commercial interest, such as false abalone, limpet, red sea urchin, mussels, snails, and chitons (Figure 2A).
The mixed substrate presented a discontinuous distribution, forming patches of little extension except for the rocky area in front of the lighthouse, characterized by the presence of hydrobiological resources of interest, such as clams, crabs, and octopus.

3.2. Main Habitat-Structuring Organisms

In the PCNR, a series of habitat structuring organisms can be found, the main ones being “subtidal kelps” L. trabeculata, “mussels” A. atra and the “red sea squirt” P. chilensis (Figure 2).
Figure 3 shows the different groupings recorded, revealing a predominance of mussel A. atra mantles, which were mainly distributed in deep areas above the 10 m isobath and in areas surrounding the rock island. The P. chilensis–L. trabeculata association dominated mainly in the northern area of the PCNR, from the 10 m isobath to shallower areas.

3.3. Lithology and Patches of Bioengineering Organisms

From the sampling, associations such as A. atra and L. trabeculata, which were predominantly concentrated in the central–southern rocky area of the PCNR in front of the Lighthouse sector and in areas surrounding the island, were also determined. P. chilesis and L. trabeculata were recorded in patches in the northern and central areas of the PCNR (Figure 4). The areas dominated by L. trabeculata without other prominent species presented an increase in coverage from the southern area, adjacent to Pozo Lizas beach, to the area called Guardianía. Moreover, Semimytilus patagonicus Hanley, 1843, a black mussel, and aggregations of porifera appeared in small patches scattered throughout the area and at variable depths. Likewise, the nuclei of areas without significant coverage of benthic organisms (bare rock or white background) were recorded mainly to the southwest of the PCNR (Figure 5).
Similarly, during the different tours in the different transects, a series of organisms of commercial importance and predators associated with the different habitats and substrate-forming organisms were recorded (Table 1).

4. Discussion

The type of substrate, combined with the action of bioengineering organisms, plays a fundamental role in the configuration of the marine substrate, which directly affects the colonization [56] and composition of benthic communities in rocky reefs [57]. The nature of the substrate—rock, sandy, muddy, or coral—is a determining factor that influences the diversity and density of organisms in a specific area, and understanding these processes is crucial for the effective conservation of species and the sustainable management of marine protected areas [17]. Likewise, the colonization of these bioengineering species is influenced by changes in environmental conditions [58,59]. A limitation in benthic communities is free space, which can be produced by events such as El Niño, as well as by predation of the sea urchin, which implies changes in habitat recolonization [60,61,62,63].
The study of the subtidal habitat presents challenges due to its characteristics and the inherent limitations of sampling, which complicates the precise determination of the distribution of species [64]. However, various methodologies have been developed that facilitate the mapping of these complex habitats [65]. In the PCNR, autonomous diving was used for the characterization of the area [66], which allowed for the collection of data necessary for the modeling of the habitat, in addition to differentiating and delimiting the different types of habitats present, providing decision-makers with a valuable tool to improve the planning and management of management actions within the reserve.
The results of this study emphasize the predominance of the rocky substrate in the shallow areas of the PCNR, which coincides with previous observations that rocky substrates are typical in the intertidal and shallow subtidal zones of other marine ecosystems [66]. This predominance directly affects biodiversity in the region, since rocky substrates tend to support a greater diversity of organisms due to the variety of habitats they offer. On the other hand, the presence of sand, which is limited to the southern area near Pozo Lizas beach and in deeper areas, indicates local variations in sedimentary dynamics, which could be influenced by currents and waves [67]. The north and west of the Natural Reserve are characterized by rocky substrate and experience less impact from waves than the south, which is characterized by greater impact and accumulation of sand due to the intense action of waves.
The identification of the mussel A. atra, the red sea squirt P. chilensis, and the subtidal kelp L. trabeculata as the main habitat formers in Punta Coles coincides with previous studies that highlight the importance of these organisms in the structuring of marine communities [19,20,21,22,23,61]. A. atra, located mainly in deep areas, could be favored by environmental stability and the availability of nutrients, which are determining factors in the distribution of bivalves [62,63]. The association of P. chilensis with L. trabeculata, which dominates the northern area of Punta Coles from the 10 m isobath to shallower areas, suggests a preference for more dynamic conditions, where the interaction between these organisms facilitates the creation of complex habitats that support high biological diversity [64]. The nature of a protected area, where exploitation is carried out through capture limits, with a reduction in fishing efforts, allows the ecosystem to be more resilient and stable [68] and can play a role in mitigating the effects of climate change, such as macroalgae [69,70]; macroalgae forests in Chile are more abundant in protected areas than in free areas [71].
The differentiated distribution of these habitat-forming organisms indicates that environmental factors such as the depth and type of substrate play crucial roles in community structuring in Punta Coles. This pattern is similar to those identified in other studies in marine systems where the depth and variability of the substrate influence the composition and structure of biological communities [65]. For example, the greater abundance of A. atra at depths greater than 10 m could be related to less competition and predation, which are more intense in shallow waters [65].
In addition, the association of P. chilensis and L. trabeculata in the shallow areas north of Punta Coles highlights the role of these organisms as ecosystem engineers, since they not only create three-dimensional habitats that support a great diversity of species but also contribute to the stability of the substrate in high-energy areas [64]. The dominant presence of this association in shallow areas could reflect the greater adaptability of these species to the dynamic conditions generated by currents and waves in these areas.
These findings underscore the need for specific conservation approaches that recognize the importance of substrates and habitat-forming organisms in the resilience of marine ecosystems [68]. The prevalence of the rocky substrate and the presence of key species such as A. atra, P. chilensis, and L. trabeculata highlight the importance of strengthening conservation measures in these areas. This is essential to preserve the integrity of the habitat structure and, therefore, to maintain the biodiversity that these areas harbor [12,13]. The protection of these ecosystems not only ensures the survival of emblematic species but also contributes to the resilience of the marine environment against environmental pressures and human activities [10,72]. In addition, it is essential to implement monitoring programs that consider the spatial and temporal variability in the distributions of these organisms to guarantee the long-term conservation of these ecosystems. Likewise, it is advisable to promote sustainable tourism and environmental education to promote the conservation of this marine protected area, ensuring the integrity of its ecosystems and the well-being of the local communities that depend on them [73,74].
The establishment of the RNP has shown favorable results in benthic resource fisheries [8]. Since 2019, work has been conducted with a limited effort to establish capture limits for octopus and sea urchin resources. This has allowed for the maintenance of their populations as well as other resources [39], as well as an economic benefit for the extractors who have also implemented self-management actions for the best use of resources [75], in addition to having different perceptions according to their knowledge of the characteristics of the habitat and its resources, discussing among the extractors’ fishing seasons, area rotation, and catch limits per vessel, among others [76,77].

5. Conclusions

The results of the study show that the dominant substrate in Punta Coles is rocky, concentrated in shallow areas, where the use of benthic resources is carried out by local extractors, whereas the sand substrate is restricted to the southern area near Pozo Lizas beach and in deeper areas. The main organisms that form habitats in this area are “mussels” A. atra, the red sea squirt P. chilensis, and the “subtidal kelps” L. trabeculata. A. atra is found mainly at depths greater than 10 m, whereas the combination of P. chilensis and L. trabeculata dominates in the northern sector of Punta Coles, from the 10 m isobath to the shallow areas. Greater knowledge of this area will allow us to reach management proposals that consider the rotation of areas during harvesting and establish intangible areas for their conservation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.M.-A. and H.H.S.G.; data curation, S.M.-A., R.P.-V., H.H.S.G., J.L.C.A., Y.A.M., A.T.C., D.E.B.C., M.A.Q.P. and J.G.A.; formal analysis, S.M.-A., R.P.-V., H.H.S.G., J.L.C.A., Y.A.M., A.T.C., D.E.B.C., M.A.Q.P. and J.G.A.; funding acquisition, S.M.-A., R.P.-V. and H.H.S.G.; investigation, S.M.-A., R.P.-V., H.H.S.G., J.L.C.A., Y.A.M., A.T.C., D.E.B.C., M.A.Q.P. and J.G.A.; methodology, S.M.-A., R.P.-V., H.H.S.G., J.L.C.A. and J.G.A.; project administration, S.M.-A., R.P.-V., H.H.S.G. and A.T.C.; resources, S.M.-A., R.P.-V., H.H.S.G., J.L.C.A., Y.A.M., A.T.C., D.E.B.C., M.A.Q.P. and J.G.A.; software, S.M.-A., R.P.-V. and H.H.S.G.; Supervision, S.M.-A., R.P.-V. and H.H.S.G.; validation, S.M.-A., R.P.-V., H.H.S.G., J.L.C.A., Y.A.M., A.T.C., D.E.B.C., M.A.Q.P. and J.G.A.; visualization, S.M.-A., A.T.C., D.E.B.C., M.A.Q.P. and J.G.A.; writing—original draft, S.M.-A., R.P.-V., A.T.C., D.E.B.C., M.A.Q.P. and J.G.A.; writing—review and editing, S.M.-A., A.T.C., D.E.B.C., M.A.Q.P. and J.G.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National University of Moquegua (UNAM) subsidiary Ilo, Peru (Resolutions No. 1279-2019-UNAM and 0102-2020-UNAM).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to the National University of Moquegua (UNAM) for the facilities provided at the Laboratorio de Biología Molecular y Biotecnología UNAM subsidiary Ilo. This work was carried out in collaboration with the Euro-Latin Network of Symbiosis for Sustainable Aquaculture (SEASOS).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Spalding, M.; Fox, H.; Allen, G.; Davison, N.; Ferdana, Z.; Finlayson, M.; Halpern, B.; Jorge, M.; Lombona, A.; Lourie, S.; et al. Marine ecoregions of the world: A bioregionalization of coastal and shelf areas. BioScience 2007, 57, 573–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tarazona, J.; Gutiérrez, D.; Paredes, C.; Indacochea, A. Overview and challenges of marine biodiversity research in Peru una revision y desafios Para la investigacion en biodiversidad marina en Peru. Gayana 2003, 67, 206–231. [Google Scholar]
  3. Figueroa, E. Biodiversidad Marina: Valoración, Usos y Perspectivas: Hacia Dónde va Chile? Editorial Universitaria: Santiago de Chile, Chile, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  4. Gómez, R. Cadenas de valor, comercio exterior y diversidad biológica/Value Chains, Trade and Biodiversity. Apuntes 2013, 40, 143–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. UNDP United Nations Development Programme. Latin America and the Caribbean: A Biodiversity Superpower. 2010. Available online: https://www.undp.org/publications/latin-america-and-caribbean-biodiversity-super-power (accessed on 20 April 2024).
  6. SERNANP—Servicio Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas por el Estado. Plan de Sitio de Punta Coles, Reserva Nacional Sistema de Islas, Islotes y Puntas Guaneras; SERNANP: Lima, Perú, 2014; 104p. [Google Scholar]
  7. Pauly, D.; Christensen, V.; Dalsgaard, J.; Froese, R.; Torres, F., Jr. Fishing down marine food webs. Science 2002, 279, 860–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hilborn, R.; Stokes, K.; Maguire, J.J.; Smith, T.; Botsford, L.W.; Mangel, M.; Orensanz, J.; Parma, A.; Rice, J.; Bell, J.; et al. When can marine reserves improve fisheries management? Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2004, 47, 197–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hilborn, R. Are MPAs effective? ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2018, 75, 1160–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sala, E.; Giakoumi, S. No-take marine reserves are the most effective protected areas in the ocean. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2018, 75, 1166–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sarker, S.; Rahman, M.J.; Wahab, M.A. Modeling the role of marine protected area in biodiversity conservation. J. Sea Res. 2023, 196, 102457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tilman, D.; Lehman, C.L.; Thomson, K.T. Plant diversity and ecosystem productivity: Theoretical considerations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 1857–1861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Naeem, S.; Wright, J.P. Disentangling biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning: Deriving solutions to a seemingly insurmountable problem. Ecol. Lett. 2003, 6, 567–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Micheli, F.; Saenz-Arroyo, A.; Greenley, A.; Vazquez, L.; Espinoza Montes, J.A.; Rossetto, M.; De Leo, G.A. Evidence that marine reserves enhance resilience to climatic impacts. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e40832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Roberts, C.M.; O’Leary, B.C.; McCauley, D.J.; Cury, P.M.; Duarte, C.M.; Lubchenco, J.; Pauly, D.; Sáenz-Arroyo, A.; Sumaila, U.R.; Wilson, R.W.; et al. Marine reserves can mitigate and promote adaptation to climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 6167–6175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Blanluet, A.; Game, E.T.; Dunn, D.C.; Everett, J.D.; Lombard, A.T.; Richardson, A.J. Evaluating ecological benefits of oceanic protected areas. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2024, 39, 175–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Jones, C.G.; Lawton, J.H.; Shachak, M. Organism as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 1994, 69, 373–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. IMARPE—Instituto del Mar del Perú. Identificación y Delimitación de Bancos Naturales de Recursos Bentónicos en el Litoral de la Región Moquegua; Informe Técnico; Instituto del Mar del Perú: Callao, Peru, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  19. Cerda, M.; Castilla, J.C. Diversity and biomass of the macroinfauna and meiofauna associated with Pyura praeputialis (Heller 1878) (Tunicata, Ascidiacea) in the Bay of Antofagasta, Chile. Rev. Chil. De Hist. Nat. 2001, 74, 841–853. [Google Scholar]
  20. Carbajal, P.; Gamarra Salazar, A.; Moore, P.J.; Pérez-Matus, A. Different kelp species support unique macroinvertebrate assemblages, suggesting the potential community-wide impacts of kelp harvesting along the Humboldt current system. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 2022, 32, 14–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sepúlveda, R.D.; Camus, P.A.; Moreno, C.A. Diversity of faunal assemblages associated with ribbed mussel beds along the South American coast: Relative roles of biogeography and bioengineering. Mar. Ecol. 2016, 37, 943–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Villegas, M.J.; Laudien, J.; Sielfeld, W.; Arntz, W.E. Macrocystis integrifolia and Lessonia trabeculata (Laminariales; Phaeophyceae) kelp habitat structures and associated macrobenthic community off northern Chile. Helgol. Mar. Res. 2008, 62, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zaixso, H.E. Cholga banks Aulacomya atra atra (Molina) (Bivalvia: Mytilidae) from the San José Gulf (Chubut, Argentina): Diversity and relationships with related facies. J. Mar. Biol. Oceanogr. 2004, 39, 61–78. [Google Scholar]
  24. Vásquez, J.; Vega, J. Macroinvertebrados asociados a discos de adhesión de algas pardas: Biodiversidad de comunidades discretas como indicadora de perturbaciones locales y de gran escala. In Biodiversidad Marina: Valoración, Uso y Perspectivas. ¿Hacia Dónde va Chile? Editorial Universitaria: Santiago de Chile, Chile, 2005; pp. 429–450. [Google Scholar]
  25. Teagle, H.; Hawkins, S.J.; Moore, P.J.; Smale, D.A. The role of kelp species as biogenic habitat formers in coastal marine ecosystems. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 2017, 492, 81–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Villouta, E.; Santelices, B. Estructura de la comunidad submareal de Lessonia (Phaeophyta, Laminariales) en Chile norte y central. Rev. Chil. De Hist. Nat. 1984, 57, 111–122. [Google Scholar]
  27. Smith, S.; Simpson, R.; Cairns, S. The macrofaunal community of Ecklonia radiata holdfast: Description of the faunal assemblage and variation associated with differences in holdfast volume. Aust. J. Ecol. 1996, 21, 81–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cacino, J.M.; Santelices, B. Importancia ecológica de los discos adhesivos de Lessonia nigrescens Bory (Phaeophyta) en chile central. Rev. De Hist. Nat. 1984, 56, 23–33. [Google Scholar]
  29. Cacino, J.M.; Santelices, B. The importance of kelp-like holdfasts as a habitat of invertebrates in central Chile. II, Factors affecting community organization. In Proceedings of the Xth International Seaweed Symposium, Göteborg, Sweden, 11–15 August 1980; Levring, T., Ed.; Walter de Gruyter y Co.: New York, NY, USA, 1981; pp. 241–246. [Google Scholar]
  30. Andrews, H.L. The kelp beds of the Monterey region. Ecology 1945, 26, 24–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bakun, A.; Weeks, S.J. The marine ecosystem off Peru: What are the secrets of its fishery productivity and what might its future hold? Prog. Oceanogr. 2008, 79, 290–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Graco, M.; Ledesma, J.; Flores, G.; Girón, M. Nutrientes, oxígeno y procesos biogeoquímicos en el sistema de surgencias de la corriente de Humboldt frente a Perú. Rev. Peru. Biol. 2007, 14, 117–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Greenstreet, S.; Hall, S. Fishing and the ground-fish assemblage structure in the northwestern North Sea: An analysis of long-term and spatial trends. J. Anim. Ecol. 1996, 65, 577–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jennings, S.; Greenstreet, S.; Reynolds, J. Structural change in an exploited fish community: A consequence of differential fishing effects on species with contrasting life histories. J. Anim. Ecol. 1999, 68, 617–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ibarra, A.A.; Reid, C.; Thorpe, A. Neo-liberalism and its impact on overfishing and overcapitalization in the marine fisheries of Chile, Mexico and Peru. Food Policy 2000, 25, 599–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gutiérrez, D.; Echevin, V.; Tam, J.; Takahashi, K.; Bertrand, A. Impacto del Cambio Climático Sobre el mar Peruano: Tendencias Actuales y Futuras; Grégoire, A., Ed.; El Perú frente al Cambio Climático resultados de investigaciones franco-peruanas (143-151); Instituto de Investigación para el Desarrollo-IRD: Montpellier, France, 2014; Available online: https://repositoriodigital.minam.gob.pe/handle/123456789/1029 (accessed on 24 April 2024).
  37. Jigena-Antelo, B.; Estrada-Ludeña, C.; Howden, S.; Rey, W.; Paz-Acosta, J.; Lopez-García, P.; Salazar-Rodriguez, E.; Endrina, N.; Muñoz-Pérez, J.J. Evidence of sea level rise at the Peruvian coast (1942–2019). Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 859, 160082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Loaiza, I.; De Boeck, G.; De Troch, M. Peruvian marine ecosystems under metal contamination: First insights for marine species consumption and sustainable management. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 826, 154132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Tejada, A.; Baldarrago, D.; Pastor, R.; Ortiz, M. Assessing the benefits of the marine protected area of Punta Coles, southern Peru (south-east Pacific) on productivity of conspicuous benthic species using pre-image population analysis. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 2023, 33, 29–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Valqui, J.; Ibañez-Erquiaga, B.; Pacheco, A.S.; Wilbur, L.; Ochoa, D.; Cardich, J.; Pérez-Huaranga, M.; Salas-Gismondi, R.; Pérez, A.; Indacochea, A.; et al. Changes in rocky intertidal communities after the 2015 and 2017 El Niño events along the Peruvian coast. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2021, 250, 107142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Caza, F.; Cledon, M.; St-Pierre, Y. Biomonitoring climate change and pollution in marine ecosystems: A review on Aulacomya ater. J. Mar. Sci. 2016, 2016, 7183813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Vásquez, J.A.; Vega, J.A.; Buschmann, A.H. Long term variability in the structure of kelp communities in northern Chile and the 1997–1998 ENSO. In Eighteenth International Seaweed Symposium, Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Seaweed Symposium, Held in Bergen, Norway, 20–25 June 2004; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 279–293. [Google Scholar]
  43. Calderón-Aguilera, L.E.; Pérez-España, H.; Cabral-Tena, R.A.; Norzagaray-Lopez, C.O.; Lopez-Pérez, A.; Alvarez-Filip, L.; Reyes-Bonilla, H. Ecological modeling and conservation on the coasts of México. In Marine Coastal Ecosystems Modeling and Conservation, Latin American Experiences; Ortiz, M., Jordan, F., Eds.; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 3–25. [Google Scholar]
  44. Hermosillo-Núñez, B.; Ortiz, M.; Jordán, F.; Endrédi, A. Macroscopic properties and keystone species complexes in kelp forest ecosystems along the north-central Chilean Coast. In Marine Coastal Ecosystems Modeling and Conservation, Latin American Experiences; Ortiz, M., Jordan, F., Eds.; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 95–119. [Google Scholar]
  45. Castilla, J.C.; Guiñez, R.; Caro, A.U.; Ortiz, V. Invasion of a rocky intertidal shore by the tunicate Pyura praeputialis in the Bay of Antofagasta, Chile. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 8517–8524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Schmiing, M.; Diogo, H.; Santos, R.S.; Afonso, P. Assessing hotspots within hotspots to conserve biodiversity and support fisheries management. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2014, 513, 187–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tovar, H.; Fuentes, H. Observaciones de aves marinas en la zona sur del Perú en diciembre de 1978. Inst. Mar Perú 1980, 68, 1–9. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12958/293 (accessed on 24 April 2024).
  48. Tovar, H. Áreas de producción y distribución de las aves marinas en el litoral peruano. Bol. Inst. Mar Perú 1968, 1, 523–546. [Google Scholar]
  49. Baldarrago, D.; Pastor, R.; Aragón, B.; Liza, C.; Tejada, A. Diversidad y abundancia de las comunidades bentónicas en matrices de organismos bioingenieros de las regiones de Moquegua y Tacna—2015. Inst. Mar Perú 2017, 44, 429–441. [Google Scholar]
  50. Baldarrago, D.; Aragón, B.; Vizcarra, Y.; Tejada, A. Estructura bentónica en el submareal somero de Punta Coles (Ilo, Moquegua) en el 2017. Inst. Mar Perú 2019, 46, 578–600. [Google Scholar]
  51. Journel, A.G.; Huijbregts, C.J. Mining Geostatistics; Academic Press: Cambridge, UK, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  52. cFolk, R.L. Petrology of Sedimentary Rocks; Hemphill Publishing Company: Austin, TX, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  53. Shepard, D. A Two-Dimensional Interpolation Function for Irregularly Spaced Data. In Proceedings of the 1968 ACM National Conference, New York, NY, USA, 27–29 August 1968; pp. 517–524. [Google Scholar]
  54. Open Geospatial Consortium OGC. 2012. Available online: https://www.ogc.org/es/press-release/ogc-adopts-netcdf-enhanced-data-model-extension-standard/ (accessed on 24 April 2024).
  55. ESRI ArcGIS, el Software SIG de Representación Cartográfica líder en el Mundo. 2010. Available online: https://www.esri.com/es-es/home (accessed on 24 August 2023).
  56. Bae, S.; Ubagan, M.D.; Shin, S.; Kim, D.G. Comparación de los patrones de reclutamiento de invertebrados marinos sésiles According to las características del sustrato. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Freeman, J.B.; Semmens, B.X.; Thompson, A.R. Impactos de las áreas marinas protegidas y el medio ambiente en la riqueza de especies de peces rocosos larvarios y la estructura de los ensambles en la bahía del sur de California. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2022, 698, 125–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Tarazona, J.; Salzwedel, H.; Arntz, W.E. Oscillations of macrobenthos in shallow waters of the Peruvian central coast induced by El Niño 1982–1983. J. Mar. Res. 1988, 46, 593–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gutiérrez, D.; Bouchon, M. El Niño Costero 2017 y sus impactos en el ecosistema marino. Bol. Inst. Mar Perú 2021, 36, 313–328. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12958/4244 (accessed on 24 August 2023). [CrossRef]
  60. Lathlean, J.A. Not all space is created equal: Distribution of free space and its influence on heat-stress and the limpet Patelloida latistrigata. J. Therm. Biol. 2014, 46, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Manríquez, P.; Guiñez, R.; Olivares, A.; Clarke, M.; Castilla, J.C. Effects of interannual temperature variability, including ENSO and post-ENSO events, on reproductive traits in the tunicate Pyura praeputialis. Mar. Biol. Res. 2018, 14, 462–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Meira, A.; Byers, J.E.; Sousa, R. A global synthesis of predation on bivalves. Biol. Rev. 2024, 99, 1015–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Navarrete, S.A.; Manzur, T. Individual- and population-level responses of a keystone predator to geographic variation in prey. Ecology 2008, 89, 2005–2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Edgar, G.J.; Stuart-Smith, R.D. Ecological effects of marine protected areas on rocky reef communities—A continental-scale analysis. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2009, 388, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Branch, G.M.; Griffiths, C.L. The Benguela ecosystem Part V. The coastal zone. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Annu. Rev. 1988, 26, 395–486. [Google Scholar]
  66. Kostylev, V.E.; Todd, B.J.; Fader, G.B.J.; Courtney, R.C.; Cameron, G.D.M.; Pickrill, R.A. Benthic habitat mapping on the Scotian Shelf based on multibeam bathymetry, surficial geology and sea floor photographs. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2001, 219, 121–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Storlazzi, C.D.; Logan, J.B.; Field, M.E. Quantitative morphological analysis of the fringing reef of Molokai, Hawaii. Coral Reefs 2016, 25, 51–66. [Google Scholar]
  68. Peleg, O.; Blain, C.O.; Shears, N.T. Long-term marine protection enhances kelp forest ecosystem stability. Ecol. Appl. 2023, 33, e2895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. 6Filbee-Dexter, K.; Starko, S.; Pessarrodona, A.; Wood, G.; Norderhaug, K.M.; Piñeiro-Corbeira, C.; Wernberg, T. Marine protected areas can be useful but are not a silver bullet for kelp conservation. J. Phycol. 2024, 60, 203–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Hopkins, C.R.; Bailey, D.M.; Potts, T. Perceptions of practitioners: Managing marine protected areas for climate change resilience. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2016, 128, 18–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bularz, B.; Fernández, M.; Subida, M.D.; Wieters, E.A.; Pérez-Matus, A. Effects of Harvesting on Subtidal Kelp Forests (Lessonia Trabeculata) in Central Chile. Ecosphere 2022, 13, e3958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Topor, Z.M.; Rasher, D.B.; Duffy, J.E.; Brandl, S.J. Marine protected areas enhance coral reef functioning by promoting fish biodiversity. Conserv. Lett. 2019, 12, e12638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Jorquera-Jaramillo, C.; Vega, J.A.; Aburto, J.; Martínez-Tillería, K.; León, M.; Perez, M.; Gaymer, C.; Squeo, F.A. Conservación de la biodiversidad en Chile: Nuevos desafíos y oportunidades en ecosistemas terrestres y marinos costeros. Rev. Chil. Hist. Nat. 2012, 85, 267–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Gómez-Aguayo, A.M.; Estruch-Guitart, V. Valoración económica de los servicios ecosistémicos marinos: Un caso de estudio de La Safor, Golfo de Valencia, España. Ecosistemas 2019, 28, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Nakandakari, A.; Caillaux, M.; Zavala, J.; Gelcich, S.; Ghersi, F. The importance of understanding self-governance efforts in coastal fisheries in Peru: Insights from La Islilla and Ilo. Bull. Mar. Sci. 2017, 93, 199–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Castrejón, M.; Defeo, O. Perceptions and attitudes of residents toward small-scale longline tuna fishing in the Galapagos Marine Reserve: Conservation and management implications. Front. Mar. Sci. 2023, 10, 1235926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Defeo, O.; Castrejón, M.; Pérez-Castañeda, R.; Castilla, J.C.; Gutiérrez, N.L.; Essington, T.E.; Folke, C. Comanagement in Latin American small-scale shellfisheries: Assessment from long-term case studies. Fish Fish. 2016, 17, 176–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Locations of the (A) study area and (B) bathythological survey transects.
Figure 1. Locations of the (A) study area and (B) bathythological survey transects.
Jmse 12 02265 g001
Figure 2. Structuring organisms identified in the PCNR: (A) L. trabeculate; (B) A. atra; and (C) P. chilensis.
Figure 2. Structuring organisms identified in the PCNR: (A) L. trabeculate; (B) A. atra; and (C) P. chilensis.
Jmse 12 02265 g002
Figure 3. Bathylithological map of the PCNR.
Figure 3. Bathylithological map of the PCNR.
Jmse 12 02265 g003
Figure 4. Distribution map of “mussels” A. atra (A); “subidal kelps” L. trabeculata (B); and the “red sea squirt” P. chilensis in the PCNR (C).
Figure 4. Distribution map of “mussels” A. atra (A); “subidal kelps” L. trabeculata (B); and the “red sea squirt” P. chilensis in the PCNR (C).
Jmse 12 02265 g004
Figure 5. Maps of the habitat structures of the Punta Coles Nature Reserve.
Figure 5. Maps of the habitat structures of the Punta Coles Nature Reserve.
Jmse 12 02265 g005
Table 1. Organisms of commercial importance and predators in Punta Coles.
Table 1. Organisms of commercial importance and predators in Punta Coles.
FunctionSpeciesCommon NameHabitat
Benthos of commercial importanceConcholepas concholepas
Bruguière, 1789
False abalone, Barnacke rock shellIt was observed mainly in shallow areas, at depths less than 10 m, with rocky substratum, inhabiting cracks and vertical rocky walls, in P. chilensis matrices and among the algae L. trabeculata.
Loxechinus albus
Molina, 1782
Red sea urchin,
Green sea urchin
It was recorded mainly in shallow areas with rocky substrate, at depths less than 10 m, forming aggregations or solitary, feeding on the remains (fronds) of L. trabeculata algae and calcareous algae. It was also found in areas without coverage (white backgrounds).
Thaisella chocolata
Duclos, 1832
Chocolate rock shellIt was recorded in deep areas with rocky substratum, more than 12 m deep, forming aggregations, each called an “egg cup”, or solitary on the matrices of A. atra.
Fissurella latimarginata
G. B. Sowerby I, 1835
Black limpetIt presented a bathymetric distribution similar to that observed for L. albus, concentrating on shallow areas with rocky substrate and associated with the disks of L. trabeculata.
Fissurella pulchra
G. B. Sowerby I, 1834
Fissurella cumingi
Reeve, 1849
Fissurella maxima
G. B. Sowerby I, 1834
LimpetThey presented a bathymetric distribution similar to that observed for F. latimarginata, recorded in the rocky substrate and associated with red calcareous algae and B. laevis barnacles.
Romaleon setosum
Molina, 1782
Rock-crabs, cancer crabIt was recorded both in rocky substrates and in soft bottoms (sandy), at depths that ranged from 5 m to 15 m, in groups or alone.
Predators CompetitorHeliaster helianthus
Lamarck, 1816
Sea sunIt was recorded mainly in deep rocky areas, between 12 and 18 m deep, feeding in groups or alone on the matrices of A. atra, as well as other small mollusks and barnacles.
Stichaster striatus
Müller and Troschel, 1840
StarfishIt was recorded in shallow rocky areas, at depths less than 10 m, solitary or forming aggregations, feeding mainly on small bivalves and barnacles.
Arbacia nigra
Molina, 1782
Black sea urchinIt presented a wide bathymetric distribution, with the greatest abundances in shallow rocky areas devoid of cover, where it formed aggregations and shared habitat with L. albus. It was also recorded feeding on the stipe and fronds of L. trabeculata.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Méndez-Ancca, S.; Pepe-Victoriano, R.; Gonzales, H.H.S.; Aguilar, J.L.C.; Meza, Y.A.; Pacho, M.A.Q.; Cáceres, A.T.; Baldarrago Centeno, D.E.; Aguilera, J.G. Discovering the Bathylithology and Bioengineering Organisms of the Punta Coles Marine Natural Reserve, Moquegua, Peru. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12, 2265. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12122265

AMA Style

Méndez-Ancca S, Pepe-Victoriano R, Gonzales HHS, Aguilar JLC, Meza YA, Pacho MAQ, Cáceres AT, Baldarrago Centeno DE, Aguilera JG. Discovering the Bathylithology and Bioengineering Organisms of the Punta Coles Marine Natural Reserve, Moquegua, Peru. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2024; 12(12):2265. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12122265

Chicago/Turabian Style

Méndez-Ancca, Sheda, Renzo Pepe-Victoriano, Hebert Hernán Soto Gonzales, Juan Luis Ccamapaza Aguilar, Yesica Alvarez Meza, Marco Antonio Quispe Pacho, Alex Tejada Cáceres, Danny Efraín Baldarrago Centeno, and Jorge González Aguilera. 2024. "Discovering the Bathylithology and Bioengineering Organisms of the Punta Coles Marine Natural Reserve, Moquegua, Peru" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 12, no. 12: 2265. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12122265

APA Style

Méndez-Ancca, S., Pepe-Victoriano, R., Gonzales, H. H. S., Aguilar, J. L. C., Meza, Y. A., Pacho, M. A. Q., Cáceres, A. T., Baldarrago Centeno, D. E., & Aguilera, J. G. (2024). Discovering the Bathylithology and Bioengineering Organisms of the Punta Coles Marine Natural Reserve, Moquegua, Peru. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 12(12), 2265. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12122265

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop