Next Article in Journal
Micro-Spatial Analysis of Maize Yield Gap Variability and Production Factors on Smallholder Farms
Previous Article in Journal
Glyphosate Bioremediation through the Sarcosine Oxidase Pathway Mediated by Lysinibacillus sphaericus in Soils Cultivated with Potatoes
Open AccessArticle

Conflicts of Interests When Connecting Agricultural Advisory Services with Agri-Input Businesses

1
Chinese Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs—CABI Joint Laboratory for Biosafety, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2 Yuanmingyuan Western Road, Beijing 100193, China
2
Agricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 12 Zhongguancun Nandajie, Beijing 100081, China
3
Beijing Plant Protection Station, 9 Beisanhuan Zhonglu, Beijing 100029, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2019, 9(10), 218; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9100218
Received: 8 August 2019 / Revised: 2 October 2019 / Accepted: 3 October 2019 / Published: 9 October 2019
Conflicts of interests have been hypothesized when agricultural advisory services are connected to agri-input businesses. However, these have not been examined using large sets of advisory service and grower data. We provide quantitative insights into dependencies between service, crop production, sustainability and the level of agri-input business-linkage of extension workers. We analyzed 34,000+ prescription forms (recommendations) issued to growers in China, as well as grower interview data. Results revealed some conflicts of interest, but to a small extent and not always as expected. Both forms of advisory service (with and without business-linkages) heavily emphasize chemical pest management. However, grower interviews revealed that business-linked advisors recommend pesticides even 18% more often than non-business-linked advisors do (96% vs. 78% of advice). This advice was also often implemented (94% and 90% uptake). There is a slightly higher chance that dangerous pesticides are being recommended by business-linked advisors (0.4% vs. 0.14%), but these advisors recommended antibiotics less frequently (1.6% vs. 2.5%). No effects of the source of advice on yields or grower profits were found. Thus, there is no apparent economic disadvantage of growers taking advice from business-linked advisors. However, if pesticide use is a concern for human health and the environment, then the increased use of such products may further exacerbate existing problems. Depending on national priorities, countries may re-consider moving away from governmental extension services, and more closely analyze the advantages of promoting agri-business-linked advisory services (no public funds, better outreach) versus the disadvantages (slightly higher pesticide risks). View Full-Text
Keywords: crop production; plant protection; consumer risks; environmental risks; agricultural policy; food safety; public and private agricultural extension service; Plantwise crop production; plant protection; consumer risks; environmental risks; agricultural policy; food safety; public and private agricultural extension service; Plantwise
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Wan, M.; Gu, R.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, Y.; Ji, H.; Wang, B.; Qiao, Y.; Toepfer, S. Conflicts of Interests When Connecting Agricultural Advisory Services with Agri-Input Businesses. Agriculture 2019, 9, 218.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop