Next Article in Journal
Long-Term Effect of Tillage Practices on Soil Physical Properties and Winter Wheat Yield in North-East Romania
Previous Article in Journal
Design and Experiment of a Laser Scoring Device for Camellia oleifera Fruits
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Role of Exogenously Applied Polyamines to Improve Heat Tolerance in Tomatoes: A Review

Department of Vegetable and Mushroom Growing, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, 1118 Budapest, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2025, 15(9), 988; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15090988
Submission received: 19 March 2025 / Revised: 25 April 2025 / Accepted: 30 April 2025 / Published: 2 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Crop Production)

Abstract

:
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is one of the most widely consumed vegetables globally and plays a crucial role in food security. However, rising temperatures due to climate change pose a significant threat to tomato cultivation by reducing yield and fruit quality. Among various abiotic stresses, heat stress (HS) can severely impair tomato growth, reproduction, and physiological functions. Polyamines (PAs), such as spermidine (Spd), putrescine (Put), and spermine (Spm), are natural compounds that play vital roles in plant stress tolerance by modulating growth and physiological responses. This review evaluates the effects of HS on tomatoes and examines the potential of exogenously applied PAs to mitigate HS. Through detailed analysis of agronomic, physiological, and biochemical responses, the review highlights how PAs can enhance heat tolerance by improving antioxidant activity, stabilizing cellular membranes, and maintaining photosynthetic efficiency. Understanding these mechanisms can aid in developing strategies to improve tomato resilience under climate stress and ensure sustainable production.

1. Introduction

Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is one of the most common and widely consumed vegetables and belongs to the family Solanaceae [1] with an estimated global production of over 189 million tons [1]. Based on the report of FAO, China, India, Turkey, America, Italy and Egypt are ranked first to sixth, respectively [2]. Tomatoes are a plentiful reservoir of vitamin A, C, and lycopene, and their increased utilization is found to reduce incidences of cardiovascular disease [3]. Tomato has remarkable nutritional value and is a source of health promoting antioxidants [4,5]. The lycopene of tomatoes also has anti-oxidative and anti-cancerous properties. Owing to these nutritional values, tomato production and consumption have been increasing continuously [6].
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) announced that the average global temperature around the world would be 1.5 °C warmer between 2030 and 2052 and more than 3–4 °C warmer by 2100 at the present emission rate [7]. A temperature increase of 3–4 °C could cause crop yields to fall by 15–35% in Africa and Asia and by 25–35% in the Middle East [8]. Research indicates that Southern and Central Europe, particularly Spain, Portugal, and Italy, are expected to experience significant temperature increases in the future [9,10]. Pinke (2017) [11] observed a consistently increasing negative impact of temperature on crop yields in Hungary, with a 1 °C temperature rise reducing the yields of four main cereals by 9.6–14.8% Meanwhile, it is estimated that, by 2050, the global population will reach 9 billion, and food demand will increase by 100–110% compared with 2005 [12].
HS is often defined as the rise in temperature beyond a threshold level for a period sufficient to cause irreversible damage to plant growth and development. In general, HS refers to the condition in which the ambient temperature is 10–15 °C higher than the optimal temperature for crop growth [13]. The optimum temperature for tomato growth and development is 13–33 °C depending on species, and most varieties cannot grow well at temperatures above 38 °C [14]. Tomato cultivation is plagued by environmental stress, which can inhibit growth and development and ultimately lower yield and fruit quality [15]. Depending on the maximum day and night temperatures and the frequency and duration of exposure, fruit setting and yield are limited under high temperature stress due to flower abscission [16]. For this reason, maintaining crop yields under adverse environmental conditions is one of the major challenges facing modern agriculture, and PAs can play a crucial role in enhancing plant resilience to these stresses. Polyamines (PAs) are known as a group of natural compounds characterized by an aliphatic nitrogen structure. The most well-known PAs include spermidine (Spd), putrescine (Put), and spermine (Spm). PAs in plants could be present in free, soluble conjugated (phenolic compounds), and insoluble bound macromolecules, such as nucleic acids and proteins [17]. PAs are recognized for their role in regulating physiological and developmental processes [18,19]. The critical influence of PAs in protecting plant cells from several abiotic stresses has been extensively demonstrated in different plant species [20,21,22,23]. In tomato seedlings, the application of exogenous Put enhanced heat tolerance by increasing chlorophyll content, reducing the activity of chlorophyll catabolic enzymes, regulating endogenous free polyamines, boosting antioxidant defense capacity, and inducing the expression of heat-shock-related genes [24]. Karwa et al. (2022) [25] also reported that foliar-applied Spd enhanced antioxidant enzyme activities, boosting the antioxidant capacity, improved photosynthesis and spikelet fertility, and helped rice plants cope with heat stress. In citrus seedling, Chao et al. (2022) [26] reported that exogenous Spd improved heat tolerance by enhancing chlorophyll content, reducing lipid peroxidation, and increasing the activity of antioxidant enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT). Similarly, in tomato, exogenous Spd application not only increased chlorophyll content and antioxidant enzyme activity but also reduced malondialdehyde (MDA) accumulation and modulated the expression of heat-shock proteins [27]. Luo et al. (2020) [28] showed that, in white clover, Spd treatment boosted the activity of peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase enzymes and heat-shock protein expression, and slowed leaf senescence under high temperatures. Likewise, Yang et al. (2022) [29] found that foliar application of exogenous Spd in lettuce seedlings under heat stress enhanced chlorophyll a and b content, increased net photosynthetic rate by 22.96%, and decreased stomatal density, preventing oxidative damage and resulting in preserved chloroplast and mitochondrial structure. Together, exogenous application of PAs plays a significant role in enhancing heat stress tolerance by modulating antioxidative mechanisms, maintaining cellular integrity, and improving metabolic functions across different plant species.

2. Tomato Responses to HS

Hot summers in many agricultural regions can negatively affect the vegetative and reproductive growth phases of crops [30,31]. Increasing the day temperature significantly restricts plant growth in many species, including tomato [32,33]. Exposure to elevated temperature can adversely influence various morphological, biochemical, and physiological traits, as well as the cellular and molecular functions of plants [34].

2.1. Agronomic Traits

Tomato plants will show many morphological changes when exposed to high temperatures, such as restricted growth of root and shoot, senescence and abscission of leaf, discoloration of fruit, number of leaves, and changes to total plant biomass and fresh weight [35,36,37].
Giri et al. (2017) [38] and Shorobi et al. (2023) [39] reported that an increase in temperature can decrease root growth, the concentration of nutrient uptake and the rate of nutrient uptake by roots. They also noted that HS causes more reduction in root growth compared to shoot growth, which decreases the rate of nutrient uptake in tomato. Furthermore, assessing plant response to high temperatures by intact roots is difficult, especially when a slight change in root temperature (12–15 °C) can significantly reduce fruit yield [40,41]. Bhattarai et al. (2021) [42] reported that the plant height and stem diameter of tomato reduced significantly under HS.
High temperature disrupts the morphology of the tomato flowers and its physiological metabolism, altering the production of compounds, such as carbohydrates, PAs, and proline [43,44,45]. This disruption contributes to floral abortion, which can result in up to 80% flower loss, thereby severely reducing fruit set [46,47]. Moreover, HS can change the sink–source association between roots and shoots, negatively influencing both vegetative and reproductive growth, which ultimately reduces yield and fruit quality [13,48]. Several researchers found that high temperature significantly decreased fruit set in tomato [49] (Table 1). For instance, Rajametov et al. (2021) [50] reported that temperature 40 °C Day/night for 7 days led to a decline in fruit weight (31.9%), fruit length (14.1%), fruit diameter (19.1%), and fruit hardness (19.1%) under HS in Dafnis cultivar while, in Minichal cultivar, fruit length (7.1%) and fruit diameter (12%) decreased but fruit weight (3.6%) and fruit hardness (8.3%) were enhanced.
Temperature affects not only fruit ripening time but also fruit growth rate [51]. The short term growth of fruit is strongly sensitive to temperature fluctuations [52,53]. One of the primary reasons for reduced fruit set under moderately elevated temperature is impaired pollen function, particularly reduced pollen release and viability, rather than pollen production itself [54,55]. Sato et al. (2000) [49] highlighted that high temperatures adversely impact pollen grain release and germination. Temperatures above 30 °C have been shown to reduce both pollen germination and pollen tube growth in tomato [56]. Pollen quality is often estimated based on carbohydrate content; moderate heat stress reduces starch and soluble sugar concentrations in mature pollen, thus diminishing pollen viability and subsequently lowering fruit set rate and yield [44,46,47,49,57,58].
As summarized in Table 1, many studies have reported that HS had a significantly harmful effect during the reproductive stage on pollen viability, quantity, and female fertility [44,49,59,60]. A significant correlation has been observed between reduced pollen viability and lower seeded fruit production [61], implicating this decline as a major limiting factor for flower pollination [54], fruit set, and lycopene accumulation in tomato under heat [44,49,62]. Furthermore, HS has a negative effect on male reproductive organ development, consistent with previous studies [43,47,59,60,63,64] (Figure 1). In addition, HS exacerbates physiological disorders, such as blossom end rot disease [65], cracked fruit appearance, and streaked ripening [65,66].
Table 1. Summary of High Temperature Impacts on Tomato Morphology and Productivity.
Table 1. Summary of High Temperature Impacts on Tomato Morphology and Productivity.
NameExposure TemperatureEffects
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)(42/37 °C) Day/nightReduction in roots more than shoots and slow to recover [38,39]
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) 43 varieties(34/24 °C) Day/nightReduction in plant height and stem diameter [42]
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) cultivars ‘Dafnis’ and ’Minichal(40 °C)
Daytime
Reduction in plant height, shoot fresh weight, root fresh weight, fruit yield, fruit length, fruit diameter [50]
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) cultivar Aromata(36/28 °C) Day/nightReduction in the shoot fresh weight [67]
(Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) cultivar (FL7156)(32/28 °C) Day/nightFlower abortion [68]
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)(37.8/26.7 °C) Day/nightReduction in flower production [69]
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) genotypes (Binatomato-6, Binatomato-5, CLN-2413, D6 12 and D6 18)(32 °C)
Daytime
Significant reduction in the number of fruits, individual fruit weight and fruit yield/plant [66]
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) cultivars ’Minichal(40 °C)
Daytime
Decline in fruit length (7.1%) and fruit diameter (12%) [50]
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) cultivars ‘Dafnis’(40 °C)
Daytime
Decline in fruit weight (31.9%), fruit length (14.1%), fruit diameter (19.1%), and fruit hardness (19.1%) [50]
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) genotypes NC8288 (29 °C)
Daytime
Reduction in fruit number, fruit weight per plant, and seed number per fruit [59]
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)(32/28 °C) Day/nightFruit abortion [49]
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)(35/23 °C) Day/nightNo fruit set [70]
Forty-four diverse tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum) lines(44/37 °C) Day/nightReduction in fruit set [41,54,55,71,72]
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)(above 30 °C) DaytimeLow pollen viability, slow pollen tube elongation, and fruit abortion [46,47]
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)(35/23 °C) Day/nightBlossom end rot [65]
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) genotypes (Binatomato-6, Binatomato-5, CLN-2413, D6 12 and D6 18)(32 °C)
Daytime
Cracked and streaked ripening [66]

2.2. Physiological Traits

High temperatures adversely affect physiological and biochemical processes in tomato plants, significantly impairing growth, development, and yield [34]. Among the most heat sensitive processes is photosynthesis, primarily due to the vulnerability of chloroplast heat-sensitive organelles essential for energy capture and carbon assimilation [74].
Heat stress disrupts chlorophyll biosynthesis, reduces chlorophyll content, and compromises chloroplast structure and function. In thermotolerant tomato genotypes, a higher chlorophyll a:b ratio and a lower chlorophyll/carotenoid ratio has been associated with enhanced heat tolerance, while chlorophyll degradation, particularly in mature leaves, is exacerbated by the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [16] Additionally, HS significantly decreases chlorophyll fluorescence, which reflects impaired photosystem function [42].
Photosynthetic efficiency is further reduced under HS due to a decline in net photosynthetic rate, increased stomatal conductance, intercellular CO2 concentration, and transpiration rate [75]. One of the main enzymatic limitations under HS is the thermolability of Rubisco activase (RCA), which hinders the activation of Rubisco, thereby restricting carbon [76,77]. Key photosynthetic parameters, including chlorophyll content (CC), the efficiency of photosystem II (Fv/Fm), and net photosynthesis, are highly sensitive to elevated temperatures [78]. Heat-sensitive tomato varieties often exhibit rapid declines in CC and reduced Fv/Fm values [50,79], making these parameters useful indicators for screening heat-tolerant genotypes [32,42,80]. As a result, HS-induced impairment of photosynthesis can reduce carbohydrate availability, negatively affecting yield during reproductive stages [54].
In addition to photosynthetic limitations, membrane stability is significantly compromised under HS. Indicators such as electrolyte leakage (EL) and relative electrical conductivity (REC) are commonly used to assess membrane integrity [13,42,50,73,81,82,83]. Heat stress increases membrane permeability, often resulting in potassium ion leakage, which disrupts ion homeostasis and leads to oxidative damage [73]. Elevated EL levels in heat-sensitive cultivars reflect greater membrane injury and reduced solute retention capacity [61]. Rajametov et al. (2021) [50] reported increased EL in sensitive tomato plants compared to more tolerant lines, further emphasizing the role of membrane stability in thermotolerance.
Heat stress also impacts plant–water relations and metabolic rates. High daytime temperatures increase transpiration demand, inducing water deficits and reducing water potential [84]. Furthermore, reproductive development is particularly vulnerable to heat, with reduced cell wall invertase (CWIN) activity being linked to poor fruit and seed set. However, in thermotolerant cultivars, higher CWIN activity mitigates fruit abortion and supports reproductive success under elevated temperatures [85].
In summary, heat stress impairs multiple physiological and biochemical pathways in tomato, including photosynthetic performance, membrane stability, water relations, and reproductive function [75]. These disruptions, ranging from reduced chlorophyll biosynthesis and enzyme activity to altered membrane permeability, collectively lead to decreased growth, diminished yield, and increased susceptibility to oxidative stress [86].

2.3. Biochemical Traits

Environmental changes, particularly HS, profoundly affect the biochemical profile of tomato plants, influencing the accumulation of key compounds, such as phenols and flavonoids, which play important roles in stress adaptation [87]. One of the primary biochemical consequences of HS is the overproduction of ROS, often triggered by increased calcium uptake by mitochondria [61,88]. This oxidative burst leads to elevated levels of MDA, a marker of lipid peroxidation and membrane damage, indicating cellular oxidative stress. To mitigate oxidative damage, plants activate defense mechanisms. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) works as a second messenger and in the nucleus activates the expression of genes with heat shock elements in their promoters, such as heat shock proteins (HSPs) and other redox enzymes antioxidants (such as SOD and CAT), and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and non-enzymatic antioxidants (such as ascorbic acid (ASA)) [13,89,90], to maintain appropriate ROS levels [91]. HS also promotes the accumulation of compatible osmolytes, such as proline [50,81] and soluble sugars [80], which protect proteins and maintain membrane stability [81]. Proline helps mitigate cellular damage and has been used to identify heat-tolerant tomato varieties [92,93].

3. The Biosynthetic Pathways of PAs and Their Role

The biosynthetic pathways of the main Pas, such as Put, Spd and Spm, are shown in Figure 2. S-adenosyl methionine decarboxylase (SAMDC) is a key enzyme involved in the biosynthesis of PAs. Cheng et al. (2009) [94] showed that transgenic tomato seedlings overexpressing the yeast S-adenosyl-l’methionine decarboxylase gene improved their tolerance to HS as compared to wild plants. Besides, another experiment studied the effect of salinity on plant growth, ethylene production and endogenous polyamine levels in spinach Spinacia oleracea, lettuce Lactuca sativa, melon Cucumis melo, pepper Capsicum annum, cabbage Brassica oleraceae, beetroot Beta vulgaris and tomato Solanum lycopersicum [95]. They found that PAs levels changed with salinity and, in most cases, Put decreased while Spd and/or Spm increased. The (Spd + Spm)/Put ratio increased with salinity in all species, increasing salinity tolerance. Endogenous PAs play pivotal roles in a wide range of growth and developmental processes, such as cell division, dormancy breaking of tubers and germination of seeds, leaf senescence, stimulation, support and development of flower buds, embryogenesis, fruit set and growth, fruit ripening, plant morphogenesis and response to biotic and abiotic stresses [96,97,98,99,100]. PAs also play a key role in stabilizing membranes, scavenging free radicals, DNA replication, transcription, and translation, affecting the activity of enzymes [101,102]. Recent studies further highlight the role of plant-derived PAs in improving stress tolerance under salinity [103], cold [104], drought [105], osmotic stress [106], high temperature [70], flooding [107,108] and enhancing abiotic stress tolerance [109]. Therefore, PAs are essential for plant development and other physiological processes [110,111,112] and it is essential to fill the knowledge gaps between climate change and food security by implementing mitigation and adaptation measures for a climate-smart food production system that ensures food security [113].

3.1. Improve Resistance to Abiotic Stresses by Exogenous Application of PAs

Numerous studies have indicated that exogenous PA application improved tolerance to different abiotic stress, as summarized in Table 2 [115,116,117,118,119]. For instance, under salinity stress conditions, Raziq et al. (2022) [120] reported that tomato seedlings treated with Spd performed noticeably better, exhibiting increased biomass and photosynthesis, improved ionic and osmotic homeostasis, and improved ROS scavenging ability. Rice plants treated with PAs also showed increased K+/Na+ ratios in their shoots, indicating better root-level discrimination between monovalent cations, particularly at xylem locations [121]. Applying exogenous Put decreased the net build-up of Na+ and Cl ions in response to salt stress. In another study, Put application mitigated the detrimental effect of NaCl on belladonna seed germination and the beginning stages of seedling growth [122]. Similarly, exogenous application of Put on rice cultivars (Oryza sativa L.) [123], soybean seedlings (Glycine max L.) [124], and mustard Brassica juncea seedlings [125] under salt stress increased ROS scavenging enzyme activity and reduced Superoxide radical (O2), H2O2 levels, MDA content, and EL. These results implied that Put improved the antioxidant system, which was then able to moderate the radical scavenging system and to lessen oxidative stress by increasing the antioxidant capacity. Similarly, applying exogenous Spd led to lower concentrations of Superoxide radical (O2) and H2O2, which in turn decreased oxidative stress in tomato plants [126]. Pascual et al. (2023) [127] noted, in response to salt and paraquat (S + PQ), that tomato plants treated with Spm increased their growth, photosynthesis, and PSII function. They also lessened the adverse impacts of S + PQ by lowering the stress-associated oxidative pressure. A study was conducted to assess the effects of supplementing Spm on cultivars of maize (Zea mays L.) that were subjected to drought stress. The results of the investigation showed that total phenols and flavonoids from both cultivars had higher concentrations of Spm and Spd after supplementation with Spm [128]. During drought stress, grafted tomato plants’ fruits had a high endogenous PA content, which had a beneficial effect on the accumulation of osmo-protectants and the activities of ROS scavenging enzymes [129]. The exogenous administration of Spm, Spd, and Put on sesame plants was investigated by Desoky et al. (2023) [130] for recovering tissue integrity, photosynthetic efficiency, and nutritional content balance. It also increased the amounts of osmo-protectants (i.e., proline and soluble sugars), as well as non-enzymatic and enzymatic antioxidants, all of which were linked to reducing ROS and the adverse effects on lipid peroxidation and EL. Drought-stressed sesame plants benefit from these beneficial effects, which raise production and quality of oil content. In wheat Triticum aestivum [131], cherry tomatoes [132], and onion Allium fstulosum [133], PAs activated the antioxidant system and alleviated the negative effects of drought stress and improved plant growth. All these results point to the role of PAs in withstanding drought stress.
Put and Spd could be applied exogenously to revitalize the adverse effect of chilling. Therefore, the enhanced EL and MDA content brought about by chilling were reduced by pretreatment with Put and Spd in cucumber [134,135]. This study showed that PAs are crucial to cucumber’s ability to withstand chilling stress, which is most likely accomplished by serving as oxidative defense against chilling damage. Moreover, another experiment found that inhibiting Put biosynthesis increased cold sensitivity, suggesting that PAs are crucial for cold adaptation in tomato plants [136].
Table 2. The effect of exogenous application of PAs on plants.
Table 2. The effect of exogenous application of PAs on plants.
PAs (Type, Application Concentration, Durations)PlantType of StressEffectiveness and Plant Response
Spd
Foliar sprayed
(0.1 mM)
(3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h)
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)SalinityEnhanced ion homeostasis (Na+/K+ ratio) Photosynthetic performance
Enhanced expression of stress-responsive genes (RBOH1)
Improved ROS scavenging [120]
Put, Spd, Spm
Irrigation
(1 mM)
(5, 12, and 19 days)
Rice (Oryza sativa L.)SalinityHigher K+/Na+ ratio in the shoots
Put induced a decrease in shoot water content
[121]
Put
Soaking seeds
(0.01 mM)
(8 h)
Belladonna (Atropa belladonna)SalinityReduction of accumulation of (Na+/K+) ions
Better germination
Early seedling growth [122]
Put
Foliar sprayed
(0.1 mM)
(Every 2 days)
Rice (Oryza sativa L.)SalinityIncreased ROS scavenging enzyme activity
Reduction of the EL [123]
Spd, Spm, Put
Foliar sprayed
(100 mg/L Spd, 150 mg/L Spm, and 150 mg/L Put)
Soybean (Glycine max L.)SalinitySpd enhanced the taproot
Spm enhanced POD 39.66% and CAT 57.94% activity
Put increased plant height, relative growth rate by 42.86% [124]
Put
Irrigation
(0.1 mM)
(7 days)
Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)SalinityInduction of enzymes in leaf tissues APX > GR > CAT > SOD > POD
Preventing membrane peroxidation Improving seedling growth [125]
Spd
Soaking seeds
(0.25 mM)
(10 h)
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)Salinity
and
Alkalinity
Enhanced root dry weights
Enhance antioxidant capacity
[126]
Spm
Irrigation
(0.5 mM)
(Once a day)
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)Salinity and ParaquatIncreased growth, photosynthesis, and PSII function, membrane stability
Enhanced gene expression for stress tolerance
Reduction of oxidative stress [127]
Put
Foliar sprayed
(0.20 and 40 mg/L)
(Before flowering initiation phase, for three continuous weeks)
Thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.)DroughtImproved leaf water content
Upregulated antioxidant enzyme activities
Increased essential oil content by 23.07% [137]
Put
Soaking seed
(0.1, 0.01, and 0.001 mM)
(10 h)
Hybrid maize (Zea mays L.)DroughtImproved plant biomass components, leaf water status, leaf area, germination rates, and antioxidant enzyme activities
[138]
Spm
Foliar sprayed
(25 mg/L)
(25 days)
Maize (Zea mays L.)DroughtIncreased total phenol and flavonoid concentration
Improved water use efficiency, osmotic adjustment, and antioxidant enzyme activities
[128]
Spd, Spm, Put
Foliar sprayed
(1 mM)
Grafted TomatoDroughtLower ROS and higher CAT, SOD activities
Improve water use efficiency, osmotic adjustment, and antioxidant enzyme activities
[129]
Spm, Spd
Foliar sprayed
(0.1 mM Spm, Put 0.2 mM)
(15, 30, and 45 days after sowing)
Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.)DroughtEnhancement in photosynthetic pigments stomatal conductance, water relations, relative water content, membrane stability index, excised leaf water retention, plant height, leaf area, number of capsules per plant, 1000-seed weight, seed yield, oil content, plant nutrient content (N, P, K)
Highly significant amelioration in osmo-protectants (free proline, soluble sugars), and antioxidant enzyme activities (CAT, POD, SOD, APX)
Highly significant reduction in oxidative stress markers (MDA, EL, O2−, H2O2) [130]
Put
Prior flooding
(2 mM)
Welsh onion (Allium fstulosum)DroughtAlleviation of relative water content, plant growth and chlorophyll fluorescence
Reduction of (O2), (H2O2) contents [133]
Spd, Spm, Put
Foliar sprayed
(1 mM Spd, 1 mM Spm, and 2 mM Put)
(Daily for 6 days)
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)DroughtImproved grain weight, size, starch, and protein content in grains
Activation of enzymes involved in starch and protein metabolism
Improved physiological responses, water use efficiency, and osmotic adjustment.
Enhanced antioxidant enzyme activities and oxidative stress markers.
Improved impact on drought stress [131]
Spd
Foliar sprayed before chilling
(0.5 mM)
(12 h before chilling)
Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. cv Jinchun No. 3 and cv Suyo)ChillingReduction of H2O2, ROS, and EL in leaves Alleviation of chilling injury
Activities of antioxidant enzymes
Improved membrane stability, plant growth
[134]
Put, Spd
Foliar sprayed
(1 mM put, 0.5 mM Spd)
(24 h before chilling)
Cucumber (Cucumis sativas L.)ChillingReduction of EL and MDA content
Activation of antioxidant enzymes
[135]
Spd, Spm, Put
Foliar sprayed before chilling
(1 mM)
(For 12 h daily)
Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.)ChillingActivation of antioxidant enzyme
Gene expression (ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), arginine decarboxylase (ADC), and S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase (SAMDC)
Put plays an important role in tomato chilling tolerance [136]

3.2. PAs and Their Roles in Molecular Level

Proteomic and transcriptomic analyses have revealed novel and multifaceted roles for PAs in regulating plant growth, development, and responses to abiotic stress [139]. PAs contribute to ion homeostasis by modulating ion channels, for instance, by inhibiting non-selective cation channels in the tonoplast to limit cytoplasmic Na⁺ influx and stimulating Ca2⁺-ATPases to sustain calcium signaling crucial for stress responses [140]. Additionally, PAs stabilize macromolecules, such as proteins, DNA, and RNA, protect membrane integrity, and act as free radical scavengers under stress conditions [120,123,125,127,141]. A key function of PAs is enhancing antioxidant defense mechanisms. They upregulate enzymes like SOD, POD, and CAT, thereby mitigating oxidative damage caused by ROS [142]. Raziq et al. (2022) [120] demonstrated that exogenous application of Spd in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) significantly improved heat stress tolerance by enhancing chlorophyll content, membrane stability, and antioxidant enzyme activities. Spd treatment reduced MDA and H2O2 levels in heat-stressed seedlings, increased antioxidant activity, and upregulated stress-related gene expression, suggesting a central role in oxidative stress tolerance [143,144].
Notably, Spd modulates gene expression at both transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. While it generally enhances antioxidant defenses, it was also shown to downregulate CAT under high temperatures [143]. Spd appears to be the most influential agent for heat adaptation among polyamines, evidenced by its elevated concentration in heat-tolerant tomato seedlings [145]. Overexpression of PA biosynthetic genes further supports their critical role in stress responses. In European pear (Pyrus communis L.), transgenic lines exhibited improved osmotic stress tolerance through enhanced antioxidant activity and reduced oxidative markers [146]. Similarly, in Arabidopsis thaliana, overexpression of the ADC2 gene (encoding arginine decarboxylase) led to elevated putrescine levels and improved drought and heat stress tolerance via enhanced ROS scavenging and improved stomatal regulation [147]. In rice, overexpression of OsSAMDC2 increased Spd and Spm levels, which promoted the expression of heat shock proteins (HSPs) and conferred greater thermotolerance during reproductive development [148].
Spd has also been shown to modulate RBOH-dependent H2O2 signaling, a key mechanism in both salt and temperature stress responses [120,149]. Elevated PA levels are consistently associated with increased thermotolerance in various crops, making them promising biomarkers for stress resilience [150,151,152]. Beyond their antioxidant and signaling functions, PAs regulate amino acid metabolism and nitrogen flux, influencing stress-induced gene expression and protein biosynthesis [153]. In tomato fruits, Spd alleviated heat stress-induced metabolic disruptions and downregulated stress-responsive genes [154].
A crucial aspect of PA signaling lies in their catabolism. The degradation of PAs by polyamine oxidases and diamine oxidases generates hydrogen peroxide, which acts as a signaling molecule to activate stress-responsive gene networks or, under extreme stress, trigger programmed cell death [155]. Moreover, PAs interact with nitric oxide (NO), another key signaling molecule. This interaction forms a feedback loop that not only regulates PA biosynthesis but also enhances stress responses, further strengthening plant tolerance [23].
Spd also enhanced the expression of multiple stress-related genes, particularly associated with ethylene, hormone signaling (abscisic acid (ABA), jasmonic acid (JA), and gibberellins (GAs)), and polyamine biosynthesis [140,154]. While both PAs and ABA individually promote stomatal closure to mitigate water loss during drought stress, their combined effects can be antagonistic. Liu et al. (2023) [156] demonstrated that, in Vicia faba and Arabidopsis thaliana, polyamines partially inhibited ABA-induced stomatal closure by activating antioxidant enzymes, such as (SOD, POD, and CAT). These enzymes scavenge hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), a signaling molecule in ABA pathways, thereby modulating the stomatal response to ABA. Further, polyamines influence ABA biosynthesis by regulating the expression of 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase (NCED), a key enzyme in ABA production. They also modulate ABA-inducible genes, like RD29A and RD29B, enhancing plant tolerance to salt stress [140].
The interplay between polyamines and ethylene is complex and context dependent. In maize under salt stress, increased ethylene levels upregulate diamine oxidase (DAO), leading to the oxidation of Put and the production of H2O2. This H2O2 not only modulates ethylene production but also stimulates polyamine biosynthesis by upregulating arginine decarboxylase (ADC) expression, creating a feedback loop that fine-tunes stress responses [147]. In rice, water stress during meiosis elevated ethylene production and reduced Spd and Spm levels, contributing to spikelet degeneration. Application of Spd or ethylene synthesis inhibitors mitigated this effect, suggesting an antagonistic relationship between ethylene and polyamine biosynthesis [157].
Polyamines also interact with other hormones, such as jasmonic acid (JA), gibberellins (GAs), and cytokinins (CKs). Under drought stress, studies in cress (Lepidium sativum) revealed that, while levels of ABA, JA, and salicylic acid (SA) increased, polyamine levels decreased, indicating a complex hormonal adjustment to prolonged stress [158]. In Arabidopsis thaliana, inoculation with Bacillus endophyticus J13 under salt stress modulated polyamine and ethylene biosynthesis and enhanced brassinosteroid signaling. This microbial interaction adjusted the expression of key biosynthetic genes, contributing to improved salinity tolerance [159].

3.3. Effects of PAs in Mitigating HS in Tomatoes

PAs have been shown to play a crucial role in plant growth and development [160] especially in tomatoes, as summarized in Table 3. In another study, heat decreased plant height, stem diameter, shoot fresh weight, root fresh weight, and shoot dry weight of tomato by 36.7, 19.6, 31.9, 18.6, and 26.4%, respectively. However, application of exogenous 1 mM Spd remarkably increased plant biomass, and alleviated growth inhibition under the high temperature stress [143]. Some studies have shown that the exogenous application of PAs improved chlorophyll fluorescence properties, hardening, and the activity of PSII [161], photosynthetic rate [127,162,163], maintained Calvin cycle, and photosynthetic carbon assimilation under high-temperature stress [144] (Figure 3.) In a further study, exogenous Spd alleviated levels of Chl a, Chl b, and total Chl (a + b) [143]. The results of another study showed that exogenous Spd significantly alleviated the growth inhibition by regulating the metabolites involved in carbohydrate and N metabolism [164]. Additionally, treatments with Spm induced the opening of stomatal pores and enhanced transpiration in tomato plants [143,164]. This agrees with previous reports proposing Spm as a stomatal regulator [165,166].
Research has consistently shown that, under high temperature stress, ROS level increased significantly, causing a higher MDA level and EL, indicating severe oxidative stress and membrane lipid peroxidation damage. Therefore, under high-temperature stress, PAs can promote photosynthesis by increasing the antioxidant capacity and maintaining the osmotic balance of plants [114,127,143,145,164,167,168,169,170,171]. Nonenzymatic antioxidants, such as ASA and reduced Glutathione (GSH), are crucial for protection of cells from toxic ROS and for maintaining redox balance under environmental stress [143].
PAs could play a key role in tomato plant responses to combined stress and delayed ripening of fruits and HS tolerance [94,172,173]. Gao et al. (2021) [174] reported the role of PAs in fruit development and ripening. The presence of high quantities of PAs delayed ripening and prolonged shelf life in cherry tomato [175] and transgenic tomatoes [173]. PAs also increased the accumulation of lycopene in the tomato plant, since PAs have been described as anti-senescence agents [176], as summarized in Table 3. Generally, many studies have demonstrated that tomato plants treated with Spm improved survival, growth, leaf damage, photosynthesis and PSII function in response to stress [122,125,126,127,177]. Thus, the presence of PAs is a useful biomolecular marker that may be used to forecast sensitivity or tolerance to high temperatures.
Table 3. Effects of exogenous application of PAs on tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) under HS.
Table 3. Effects of exogenous application of PAs on tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) under HS.
Effectiveness and Plant ResponsePAs (Type, Concentration, Application)
Increased plant biomass and growth
Alleviated photosynthetic pigments, the levels of Chl a, Chl b, and total Chl (a + b) by 20.1, 21.8, and 20.6%, respectively
(Spd, 1 mM, foliar spray) [143]
Improved chlorophyll fluorescence properties, hardening and the activity of PSII(Spd, 4 mM, foliar spray) [161]
Enhanced photosynthetic rate(Put, 1 mM, foliar spray) [121]
(Spd, 0.5 mM, root drench) [135]
(Spm, 0.25 mM, foliar spray) [149]
(Mixture of PAs, 0.5 mM) [150]
Improved the gene expression and activity of key enzymes for N metabolism(Spd, 1 mM, foliar spray) [164]
Opening of stomatal pores and enhanced transpiration(Spd, 1 mM, foliar spray) [134,151]
(Spd, Put, Spm 1 mM, foliar spray) [152]
(Spm, 0.5 mM, foliar spray) [177]
Reduced H2O2 and MDA accumulation, alleviated oxidative damage
Increased antioxidant enzymes’ activities, protection of membrane lipid peroxidation
ROS scavengers’ osmotic balance
(Spd, Put, Spm 1 mM, foliar spray) [101]
(Spm, 1 mM, foliar spray) [121]
(Spd, 1 mM, foliar spray) [134,151]
Improved the accumulation of lycopene as an anti-senescence agent in fruit ripening/senescence processes(Increase polyamine levels by genetic modification) [176]
Increased fruit shelf-life and enhanced fruit juice quality
Delayed ripening
(Increase polyamine levels by genetic modification) [94,172,173,174,175]

4. Conclusions and Prospects

Tomatoes are particularly sensitive to HS, with flowering and fruit set being the most vulnerable developmental stages. Prolonged exposure to elevated temperatures often leads to significant reductions in yield and fruit quality. Polyamines have demonstrated potential in enhancing thermotolerance by mitigating heat-induced oxidative damage through the activation of antioxidant defense systems, stabilization of cellular membranes, and reduction of ROS accumulation. These protective mechanisms help preserve photosynthetic efficiency and overall plant vitality under HS conditions. Consequently, PAs-based treatments represent a promising strategy for improving plant resilience throughout the tomato life cycle.
However, despite these benefits, the specific developmental stages most responsive to exogenous PA application and the molecular mechanisms underlying PA-mediated thermotolerance remain insufficiently characterized. Future research should focus on evaluating PA effects across key growth stages by integrating gene expression analysis, physiological assessments, and morphological observations under controlled HS conditions. Moreover, recent advances in gene editing technologies, such as CRISPR/Cas9, provide powerful tools for precisely manipulating genes involved in PAs biosynthesis, catabolism, and signaling pathways. Combining these approaches with transcriptomic and physiological profiling could yield critical insights into the regulatory networks of PAs in heat stress adaptation and facilitate the development of tomato cultivars with enhanced heat tolerance.

Author Contributions

R.N.: methodology, investigation, writing, formal analysis. M.M.: Conceptualization, writing-review and editing, Supervision. N.K.: Supervision, Conceptualization, project administration, funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Stipendium Hungaricum Scholarship Program and by the Flagship Research Groups Programme of the Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely appreciate the Department of Vegetable and Mushroom Growing, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, for supporting this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
HSHeat stress
PAsPolyamines
SpdSpermidine
PutPutrescine
SpmSpermine
ELElectrolyte leakage
RECRelative electrical conductivity
RCARubisco activase
CCChlorophyll content
CWINCell wall invertase
ROSReactive Oxygen Species
MDAMalondialdehyde
SODSuperoxide dismutase
PODPeroxidase
CATCatalase
APXAscorbate peroxidase
ASAAscorbic acid
H2O2Hydrogen peroxide
O2Superoxide radical
ChlChlorophyll

References

  1. Costa, J.; Heuvelink, E. Introduction: The Tomato Crop and Industry. In Tomatoes; CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK, 2005; pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. FAOSTAT. Global Tomato Production in 2021; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2021. Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/TP (accessed on 2 October 2021).
  3. Ganguly, D.R.; Crisp, P.A.; Eichten, S.R.; Pogson, B.J. Maintenance of Pre-existing DNA Methylation States Through Recurring Excess-light Stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2018, 41, 1657–1672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Li, B.; Gao, K.; Ren, H.; Tang, W. Molecular Mechanisms Governing Plant Responses to High Temperatures. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2018, 60, 757–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hideg, É.; Jansen, M.A.; Strid, Å. UV-B Exposure, ROS, and Stress: Inseparable Companions or Loosely Linked Associates? Trends Plant Sci. 2013, 18, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Easterling, W.E.; Aggarwal, P.K.; Batima, P.; Brander, K.M.; Erda, L.; Howden, S.M.; Tubiello, F.N. Food, Fibre and Forest Products. Clim. Change 2007, 2007, 273–313. [Google Scholar]
  7. IPCC. Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis; Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Stocker, T.F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S.K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., Midgley, P.M., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2013; Available online: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/WG1AR5_SPM_FINAL.pdf (accessed on 25 September 2024).
  8. Ortiz, R.; Braun, H.J.; Crossa, J.; Crouch, J.H.; Davenport, G.; Dixon, J.; Dreisigacker, S.; Duveiller, E.; He, Z.; Iwanaga, M.; et al. Wheat Genetic Resources Enhancement by the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT). Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2008, 55, 1095–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cardell, M.F.; Amengual, A.; Romero, R.; Ramis, C. Future Extremes of Temperature and Precipitation in Europe Derived from a Combination of Dynamical and Statistical Approaches. Int. J. Climatol. 2020, 40, 4800–4827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Carvalho, D.; Cardoso Pereira, S.; Rocha, A. Future Surface Temperature Changes for the Iberian Peninsula According to EURO-CORDEX Climate Projections. Clim. Dyn. 2021, 56, 123–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pinke, Z.; Lövei, G.L. Increasing temperature cuts back crop yields in Hungary over the last 90 years. Glob. Change Biol. 2017, 23, 5426–5435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tilman, D.; Balzer, C.; Hill, J.; Befort, B.L. Global Food Demand and the Sustainable Intensification of Agriculture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 20260–20264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wahid, A.; Gelani, S.; Ashraf, M.; Foolad, M.R. Heat Tolerance in Plants: An Overview. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2007, 61, 199–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, S.W.; Ai, G.; Li, M.; Ye, Z.B.; Zhang, J.H. Tomato LrgB Regulates Heat Tolerance and the Assimilation and Partitioning of Carbon. Plant Sci. 2018, 274, 309–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Seo, P.J.; Xiang, F.; Qiao, M.; Park, J.-Y.; Na Lee, Y.; Kim, S.-G.; Lee, Y.-H.; Park, W.J.; Park, C.-M. The MYB96 Transcription Factor Mediates Abscisic Acid Signaling During Drought Stress Response in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2009, 151, 275–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Camejo, D.; Rodríguez, P.; Morales, M.A.; Dell’Amico, J.M.; Torrecillas, A.; Alarcón, J.J. High Temperature Effects on Photosynthetic Activity of Two Tomato Cultivars with Different Heat Susceptibility. J. Plant Physiol. 2005, 162, 281–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Duan, J.J.; Li, J.; Guo, S.R.; Kang, Y.Y. Exogenous Spermidine Affects Polyamine Metabolism in Salinity-Stressed Cucumis sativus Roots and Enhances Short-Term Salinity Tolerance. Plant Physiol. 2008, 165, 1620–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yadav, P.; Ansari, M.W.; Kaula, B.C.; Rao, Y.R.; Meselmani, M.A.; Siddiqui, Z.H.; Brajendra; Kumar, S.B.; Rani, V.; Sarkar, A.; et al. Regulation of Ethylene Metabolism in Tomato Under Salinity Stress Involving Linkages with Important Physiological Signaling Pathways. Plant Sci. 2023, 334, 111736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Killiny, N.; Nehela, Y. Citrus Polyamines: Structure, Biosynthesis, and Physiological Functions. Plants 2020, 9, 426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zandalinas, S.I.; Balfagón, D.; Gómez-Cadenas, A.; Mittler, R. Responses of Plants to Climate Change: Metabolic Changes During Abiotic Stress Combination in Plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 73, 3339–3354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Paschalidis, K.; Tsaniklidis, G.; Wang, B.Q.; Delis, C.; Trantas, E.; Loulakakis, K.; Makky, M.; Sarris, P.F.; Ververidis, F.; Liu, J.-H. The Interplay Among Polyamines and Nitrogen in Plant Stress Responses. Plants 2019, 8, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Salam, U.; Ullah, S.; Tang, Z.H.; Elateeq, A.A.; Khan, Y.; Khan, J.; Khan, A.; Ali, S. Plant Metabolomics: An Overview of the Role of Primary and Secondary Metabolites Against Different Environmental Stress Factors. Life 2023, 13, 706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tyagi, A.; Ali, S.; Ramakrishna, G.; Singh, A.; Park, S.; Mahmoudi, H.; Bae, H. Revisiting the Role of Polyamines in Plant Growth and Abiotic Stress Resilience: Mechanisms, Crosstalk, and Future Perspectives. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2023, 42, 5074–5098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jahan, M.S.; Hasan, M.M.; Alotaibi, F.S.; Alabdallah, N.M.; Alharbi, B.M.; Ramadan, K.M.A.; Bendary, E.S.A.; Alshehri, D.; Jabborova, D.; Al-Balawi, D.A.; et al. Exogenous putrescine increases heat tolerance in tomato seedlings by regulating chlorophyll metabolism and enhancing antioxidant defense efficiency. Plants 2022, 11, 1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Karwa, S.; Taunk, J.; Maurya, S.; Das, A.; Krishna, G.K.; Arya, S.S.; Kumar, A.; Kumar, S.; Kumar, P.; Chinnusamy, V.; et al. Spermidine exogenous application mollifies reproductive stage heat stress ramifications in rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1027662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Chao, X.; Yuqing, T.; Xincheng, L.; Huidong, Y.; Yuting, W.; Zhongdong, H.; Xinlong, H.; Buchun, L.; Jing, S. Exogenous spermidine enhances the photosynthetic and antioxidant capacity of citrus seedlings under high temperature. Plant Signal Behav. 2022, 17, 2086372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Peng, C.; Shu, S.; Wang, Y.; Du, J.; Shi, L.; Jahan, M.S.; Guo, S. Transcriptome Analysis of the Regulatory Mechanism of Exogenous Spermidine in High Temperature Stress Resistance of Tomato Seedlings. Agronomy 2023, 13, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Luo, L.; Li, Z.; Tang, M.Y.; Cheng, B.Z.; Zeng, W.H.; Peng, Y.; Nie, G.; Zhang, X.Q. Metabolic regulation of polyamines and γ-aminobutyric acid in relation to spermidine-induced heat tolerance in white clover. Plant Biol. 2020, 22, 794–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yang, X.; Han, Y.; Hao, J.; Qin, X.; Liu, C.; Fan, S. Exogenous spermidine enhances the photosynthesis and ultrastructure of lettuce seedlings under high-temperature stress. Sci. Hortic. 2022, 291, 110570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Panthee, D.R.; Gotame, T.P. Improving Heat Stress Tolerance in Tomato; CABI Reviews: Online, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Harel, D.; Fadida, H.; Slepoy, A.; Gantz, S.; Shilo, K. The Effect of Mean Daily Temperature and Relative Humidity on Pollen, Fruit Set, and Yield of Tomato Grown in Commercial Protected Cultivation. Agronomy 2014, 4, 167–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhou, R.; Yu, X.; Kjær, K.H.; Rosenqvist, E.; Ottosen, C.O.; Wu, Z. Screening and Validation of Tomato Genotypes under Heat Stress Using Fv/Fm to Reveal the Physiological Mechanism of Heat Tolerance. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2015, 118, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lu, T.; Meng, Z.; Zhang, G.; Qi, M.; Sun, Z.; Liu, Y.; Li, T. Sub-high Temperature and High Light Intensity Induced Irreversible Inhibition on Photosynthesis System of Tomato Plant (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Singh, A.K.; Singh, M.K.; Singh, V.; Singh, R.; Raghuvanshi, T.; Singh, C. Debilitation in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) as a Result of Heat Stress. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2017, 6, 1917–1922. [Google Scholar]
  35. Shaheen, M.R.; Ayyub, C.M.; Amjad, M.; Waraich, E.A. Morpho-physiological Evaluation of Tomato Genotypes under High Temperature Stress Conditions. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2016, 96, 2698–2704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Laxman, R.H.; John, S.V.S.; Biradar, G.; Pavithra, G.B.; Manasa, K.M.; Sadashiva, A.T.; Bhatt, R.M. Growth, Reproductive Development, and Yield of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Genotypes under Mild Temperature Elevation. Asian J. Bot. 2018, 1, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  37. Yu, W.; Wang, L.; Zhao, R.; Sheng, J.; Zhang, S.; Li, R.; Shen, L. Knockout of SlMAPK3 Enhances Tolerance to Heat Stress Involving ROS Homeostasis in Tomato Plants. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Giri, A.; Heckathorn, S.; Mishra, S.; Krause, C. Heat Stress Decreases Levels of Nutrient-Uptake and Assimilation Proteins in Tomato Roots. Plants 2017, 6, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shorobi, F.M.; Vyavahare, G.D.; Seok, Y.J.; Park, J.H. Effect of Polypropylene Microplastics on Seed Germination and Nutrient Uptake of Tomato and Cherry Tomato Plants. Chemosphere 2023, 329, 138679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Driedonks, N.J.W. From Flower to Fruit in the Heat—Reproductive Thermotolerance in Tomato and Its Wild Relatives. Ph.D. Thesis, The Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  41. Bita, C.E.; Gerats, T. Plant Tolerance to High Temperature in a Changing Environment: Scientific Fundamentals and Production of Heat Stress-Tolerant Crops. Front. Plant Sci. 2013, 4, 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bhattarai, S.; Harvey, J.T.; Djidonou, D.; Leskovar, D.I. Exploring Morphophysiological Variation for Heat Stress Tolerance in Tomato. Plants 2021, 10, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Alsamir, M.; Ahmad, N.M.; Mahmood, T.; Trethowan, R. Morpho-Physiological Traits Linked to High Temperature Stress Tolerance in Tomato (S. lycopersicum L.). Am. J. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 2681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sato, S.; Kamiyama, M.; Iwata, T.; Makita, N.; Furukawa, H.; Ikeda, H. Moderate Increase of Mean Daily Temperature Adversely Affects Fruit Set of Lycopersicon esculentum by Disrupting Specific Physiological Processes in Male Reproductive Development. Ann. Bot. 2006, 97, 731–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Song, J.; Nada, K.; Tachibana, S. Suppression of S-Adenosylmethionine Decarboxylase Activity is a Major Cause for High-Temperature Inhibition of Pollen Germination and Tube Growth in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Plant Cell Physiol. 2002, 43, 619–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ruan, Y.-L.; Jin, Y.; Yang, Y.-J.; Li, G.-J.; Boyer, J.S. Sugar Input, Metabolism, and Signaling Mediated by Invertase: Roles in Development, Yield Potential, and Response to Drought and Heat. Mol. Plant 2010, 3, 942–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Rieu, I.; Twell, D.; Firon, N. Pollen Development at High Temperature: From Acclimation to Collapse. Plant Physiol. 2017, 173, 1967–1976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zinn, K.E.; Tunc-Ozdemir, M.; Harper, J.F. Temperature Stress and Plant Sexual Reproduction: Uncovering the Weakest Links. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61, erq053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Sato, S.; Peet, M.M.; Thomas, J.F. Physiological Factors Limit Fruit Set of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) under Chronic, Mild Heat Stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2000, 23, 719–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rajametov, S.N.; Yang, E.Y.; Jeong, H.B.; Cho, M.C.; Chae, S.Y.; Paudel, N. Heat Treatment in Two Tomato Cultivars: A Study of the Effect on Physiological and Growth Recovery. Horticulturae 2021, 7, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Adams, S.R.; Cockshull, K.E.; Cave, C.R.J. Effect of Temperature on the Growth and Development of Tomato Fruits. Ann. Bot. 2001, 88, 869–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yang, T.; He, Y.; Niu, S.; Zhang, Y. A YABBY Gene CRABS CLAW (CRCa) Negatively Regulates Flower and Fruit Sizes in Tomato. Plant Sci. 2022, 320, 111285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, D.; Seymour, G.B. Molecular and Biochemical Basis of Softening in Tomato. Mol. Horticult. 2022, 2, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Alsamir, M.; Mahmood, T.; Trethowan, R.; Ahmad, N. An Overview of Heat Stress in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 1654–1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Stokes, M.; Geitmann, A. Screening Methods for Thermotolerance in Pollen. Ann. Bot. 2025, 135, 71–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Johri, B.M.; Vasil, I.K. Physiology of Pollen. Bot. Rev. 1961, 27, 325–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kumar, S.; Prakash, P.; Kumar, S.; Srivastava, K. Role of Pollen Starch and Soluble Sugar Content on Fruit Set in Tomato under Heat Stress. Sabrao J. Breed Genet. 2015, 47, 406–412. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292160041 (accessed on 20 September 2024).
  58. Ayenan, M.A.T.; Danquah, A.; Hanson, P.; Ampomah-Dwamena, C.; Sodedji, F.A.K.; Asante, I.K.; Danquah, E.Y. Accelerating Breeding for Heat Tolerance in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.): An Integrated Approach. Agronomy 2019, 9, 720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Peet, M.M.; Sato, S.; Gardner, R.G. Comparing Heat Stress Effects on Male-Fertile and Male-Sterile Tomatoes. Plant Cell Environ. 1998, 21, 225–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Paupière, M.J.; van Haperen, P.; Rieu, I.; Visser, R.G.F.; Tikunov, Y.M.; Bovy, A.G. Screening for Pollen Tolerance to High Temperatures in Tomato. Euphytica 2017, 213, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Xu, J.; Wolters-Arts, M.; Mariani, C.; Huber, H.; Rieu, I. Heat Stress Affects Vegetative and Reproductive Performance and Trait Correlations in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Euphytica 2017, 213, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sato, S.; Peet, M.M. The Effects of Moderately Elevated Temperature Stress on the Timing of Pollen Release and Germination in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2005, 80, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Raja, M.M.; Vijayalakshmi, G.; Naik, M.L.; Basha, P.O.; Sergeant, K.; Hausman, J.F.; Khan, P.S.S.V. Pollen development and function under heat stress: From effects to responses. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2019, 41, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Müller, F.; Rieu, I. Acclimation to high temperature during pollen development. Plant Reprod. 2016, 29, 107–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Spaldon, S.; Samnotra, R.K.; Chopra, S. Climate resilient technologies to meet the challenges in vegetable production. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2015, 3, 28–47. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277664533 (accessed on 15 September 2024).
  66. Islam, M.T. Effect of temperature on photosynthesis, yield attributes and yield of tomato genotypes. Int. J. Expt. Agric. 2011, 2, 8–11. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267705727 (accessed on 12 September 2024).
  67. Zhou, R.; Kjær, K.H.; Rosenqvist, E.; Yu, X.; Wu, Z.; Ottosen, C.-O. Physiological response to heat stress during seedling and anthesis stage in tomato genotypes differing in heat tolerance. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2017, 203, 68–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sato, S.; Peet, M.M.; Gardner, R.G. Altered flower retention and developmental patterns in nine tomato cultivars under elevated temperature. Sci. Hortic. 2004, 101, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. El Ahmadi, A.B.; Stevens, M.A. Reproductive responses of heat-tolerant tomatoes to high temperatures. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 1979, 104, 686–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Khan, Q.; Wang, Y.; Xia, G.; Yang, H.; Luo, Z.; Zhang, Y. Deleterious Effects of Heat Stress on the Tomato, Its Innate Responses, and Potential Preventive Strategies in the Realm of Emerging Technologies. Metabolites 2024, 14, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Abdelmageed, A.H.A.; Gruda, N. Influence of grafting on growth, development and some physiological parameters of tomatoes under controlled heat stress conditions. Eur. J. Hortic. Sci. 2009, 74, 16–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. EL-Saka, Z.I. Tomato breeding for heat stress conditions. Eur. J. Acad. Essays 2016, 3, 87–93. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368876692 (accessed on 15 September 2024).
  73. Alsamir, M.; Ahmad, N.M.; Keitel, C.; Mahmood, T.; Trethowan, R. Identification of high-temperature tolerant and agronomically viable tomato (S. lycopersicum) genotypes from a diverse germplasm collection. Adv. Crop Sci. Technol. 2017, 5, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Berova, M.; Stoeva, N.; Zlatko, Z.; Ganeva, D. Physiological response of some tomato genotypes (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) to high-temperature stress. J. Cent. Eur. Agric. 2008, 9, 723–732. [Google Scholar]
  75. Zhang, J.; Jiang, X.; Li, T.; Chang, T. Effect of Elevated Temperature Stress on the Production and Metabolism of Photosynthate in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) Leaves. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 2012, 87, 367–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Hu, W.J.; Wu, Q.; Liu, X.; Shen, Z.J.; Chen, J.; Zhu, C.Q.; Zhang, Y.L.; Wang, Y.L.; Zhang, L.L.; Zhang, J.L.; et al. Comparative Proteomic Analysis Reveals the Effects of Exogenous Calcium Against Acid Rain Stress in Liquidambar formosana Hance Leaves. J. Proteome Res. 2015, 15, 216–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Sharkey, T.D. Effects of Moderate Heat Stress on Photosynthesis: Importance of Thylakoid Reactions, Rubisco Deactivation, Reactive Oxygen Species, and Thermotolerance Provided by Isoprene. Plant Cell Environ. 2005, 28, 269–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Mathur, S.; Agrawal, D.; Jajoo, A. Photosynthesis: Response to High Temperature Stress. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 2014, 137, 116–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Sharma, D.K.; Andersen, S.B.; Ottosen, C.O.; Rosenqvist, E. Wheat Cultivars Selected for High Fv/Fm under Heat Stress Maintain High Photosynthesis, Total Chlorophyll, Stomatal Conductance, Transpiration, and Dry Matter. Physiol. Plant. 2015, 153, 284–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Zhou, R.; Yu, X.Q.; Ottosen, C.O.; Rosenqvist, E.; Zhao, L.P.; Wang, Y.L.; Yu, W.G.; Zhao, T.M.; Wu, Z. Drought Stress Had a Predominant Effect over Heat Stress on Three Tomato Cultivars Subjected to Combined Stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2017, 17, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Karkute, S.G.; Ansari, W.A.; Singh, A.K.; Singh, P.M.; Rai, N.; Bahadur, A.; Singh, J. Characterization of High-Temperature Stress-Tolerant Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Genotypes by Biochemical Analysis and Expression Profiling of Heat-Responsive Genes. 3 Biotech 2021, 11, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Nankishore, A.; Farrell, A.D. The Response of Contrasting Tomato Genotypes to Combined Heat and Drought Stress. J. Plant Physiol. 2016, 202, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Dai, Y.; Yuan, L.; Zhang, S.; Wang, J.; Xie, S.; Zhao, M.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, H.; et al. Comprehensive Evaluation for Cold Tolerance in Wucai (Brassica campestris L.) by the Performance Index on an Absorption Basis (PIabs). Agronomy 2019, 9, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Qi, B.; Wu, C. Potential roles of stigma exsertion on spikelet fertility in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under heat stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Liu, Y.-H.; Offler, C.E.; Ruan, Y.-L. Cell Wall Invertase Promotes Fruit Set under Heat Stress by Suppressing ROS-Independent Cell Death. Plant Physiol. 2016, 172, 163–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zhang, J.; Jiang, X.D.; Li, T.L.; Cao, X.J. Photosynthesis and ultrastructure of photosynthetic apparatus in tomato leaves under elevated temperature. Photosynthetica 2014, 52, 430–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ilahy, R.; Siddiqui, M.W.; Piro, G.; Lenucci, M.S.; Hdider, C. Year-to-year variations in antioxidant components of high-lycopene tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) breeding lines. Turk. J. Agric. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 4, 486–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Blanchard-Gros, R.; Bigot, S.; Martinez, J.-P.; Lutts, S.; Guerriero, G.; Quinet, M. Comparison of Drought and Heat Resistance Strategies among Six Populations of Solanum chilense and Two Cultivars of Solanum lycopersicum. Plants 2021, 10, 1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Huang, W.; Yang, Y.J.; Hu, H.; Zhang, S.B. Moderate Photoinhibition of Photosystem II Protects Photosystem I from Photodamage at Chilling Stress in Tobacco Leaves. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Hossain, M.A.; Silva, J.A.T.D.; Fujita, M. Plant Response and Tolerance to Abiotic Oxidative Stress: Antioxidant Defense Is a Key Factor. In Crop Stress and Its Management: Perspectives and Strategies; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 261–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. De Pinto, M.C.; Locato, V.; Paradiso, A.; De Gara, L. Role of Redox Homeostasis in Thermo-Tolerance under a Climate Change Scenario. Ann. Bot. 2015, 116, 487–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Gujjar, R.S.; Karkute, S.G.; Rai, A.; Singh, M.; Singh, B. Proline-Rich Proteins May Regulate Free Cellular Proline Levels during Drought Stress in Tomato. Curr. Sci. 2018, 114, 915–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Aldubai, A.A.; Alsadon, A.A.; Migdadi, H.H.; Alghamdi, S.S.; Al-Faifi, S.A.; Afzal, M. Response of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Genotypes to Heat Stress Using Morphological and Expression Study. Plants 2022, 11, 615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Cheng, L.; Zou, Y.; Ding, S.; Zhang, J.; Yu, X.; Cao, J.; Lu, G. Polyamine Accumulation in Transgenic Tomato Enhances the Tolerance to High Temperature Stress. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2009, 51, 489–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Zapata, P.J.; Serrano, M.; Pretel, M.T.; Amorós, A.; Botella, M.A. Polyamines and Ethylene Changes during Germination of Different Plant Species under Salinity. Plant Sci. 2004, 167, 781–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Liu, Q.; Nishibori, N.; Imai, I.; Hollibaugh, J.T. Response of Polyamine Pools in Marine Phytoplankton to Nutrient Limitation and Variation in Temperature and Salinity. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2016, 544, 93–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Ebeed, H.T.; Hassan, N.M.; Aljarani, A.M. Exogenous Applications of Polyamines Modulate Drought Responses in Wheat through Osmolytes Accumulation, Increasing Free Polyamine Levels and Regulation of Polyamine Biosynthetic Genes. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 118, 438–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Zhang, T.; Zhang, Q.; Pan, Y.; Che, F.; Wang, Q.; Meng, X.; Rao, J. Changes of Polyamines and CBFs Expressions of Two Hami Melon (Cucumis melo L.) Cultivars during Low Temperature Storage. Sci. Hortic. 2017, 224, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Mattoo, A.K.; Sobieszczuk-Nowicka, E. Polyamine as Signaling Molecules and Leaf Senescence. In Senescence Signalling and Control in Plants; Sarwat, M., Tuteja, N., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, UK, 2018; pp. 125–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Pál, M.; Ivanovska, B.; Oláh, T.; Tajti, J.; Hamow, K.Á.; Szalai, G.; Khalil, R.; Vanková, R.; Dobrev, P.; Misheva, S.P.; et al. Role of polyamines in plant growth regulation of Rht wheat mutants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 137, 189–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Slocum, R.D.; Kaur-Sawhney, R.; Galston, A.W. The physiology and biochemistry of polyamines in plants. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1984, 235, 283–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Childs, C.; Holdsworth, R.E.; Christopher, A.L.; Jackson, M.; Anzocchi, T.; Walsh, J.J.; Yielding, G. Introduction to the geometry and growth of normal faults. Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ. 2017, 439, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Ma, S.; Zhou, X.; Jahan, M.S.; Guo, S.; Tian, M.; Zhou, R.; Liu, H.; Feng, B.; Shu, S. Putrescine regulates stomatal opening of cucumber leaves under salt stress via the H2O2-mediated signaling pathway. Plant Physil. Bioch 2022, 170, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Sun, X.; Yuan, Z.; Wang, B.; Zheng, L.; Tan, J.; Chen, F. Physiological and transcriptome changes induced by exogenous putrescine in anthurium under chilling stress. Bot. Stud. 2020, 61, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. El-Badri, A.M.A.; Batool, M.; Mohamed, I.A.A.; Khatab, A.; Sherif, A.; Wang, Z.; Salah, A.; Nishawy, E.; Ayaad, M.; Kuai, J.; et al. Modulation of salinity impact on early seedling stage via nano-priming application of zinc oxide on rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Plant Physil. Bioch. 2021, 166, 376–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Sen, S.; Ghosh, D.; Mohapatra, S. Modulation of polyamine biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana by a drought mitigating Pseudomonas putida strain. Plant Physil. Bioch. 2018, 129, 180–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Shi, Y.; Lv, M.; Liu, Z.; Yang, X.; Yang, L.; Dong, L.; Lei, F.; Xie, A.; Zhang, D.; Bao, M.; et al. The Polyamine Signaling Pathway in Response to Waterlogging Stress of Paeonia lactiflora. Horticulturae 2024, 10, 928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Chattopadhyay, M.K.; Tiwari, B.S.; Chattopadhyay, G.; Bose, A.; Sengupta, D.N.; Ghosh, B. Protective role of exogenous polyamines on salinity-stressed rice (Oryza sativa) plants. Physiol. Plant. 2002, 116, 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Jing, J.G.; Guo, S.Y.; Li, Y.F.; Li, W.H. Effects of polyamines on agronomic traits and photosynthetic physiology of wheat under high temperature stress. Photosynthetica 2019, 57, 912–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Choudhary, S.; Wani, K.I.; Naeem, M.; Khan, M.M.A.; Aftab, T. Cellular responses, osmotic adjustments, and role of osmolytes in providing salt stress resilience in higher plants: Polyamines and nitric oxide crosstalk. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2022, 7, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. González-Hernández, A.I.; Scalschi, L.; Vicedo, B.; Marcos-Barbero, E.L.; Morcuende, R.; Camañes, G. Putrescine: A key metabolite involved in plant development, tolerance and resistance responses to stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 2971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Islam, M.J.; Uddin, M.J.; Hossain, M.A.; Henry, R.; Begum, M.K.; Sohel, M.A.T.; Mou, M.A.; Ahn, J.; Cheong, E.J.; Lim, Y.S. Exogenous putrescine attenuates the negative impact of drought stress by modulating physio-biochemical traits and gene expression in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0262099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Farooq, M.S.; Uzair, M.; Raza, A.; Habib, M.; Xu, Y.; Yousuf, M.; Yang, S.H.; Ramzan Khan, M. Uncovering the research gaps to alleviate the negative impacts of climate change on food security: A review. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 927535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Gill, S.S.; Tuteja, N. Polyamines and abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Plant Signal Behav. 2010, 5, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Basit, F.; Liu, J.; An, J.; Chen, M.; He, C.; Zhu, X.; Li, Z.; Hu, J.; Guan, Y. Brassinosteroids as a multidimensional regulator of plant physiological and molecular responses under various environmental stresses. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 44768–44779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Liu, J.-H.; Wang, W.; Wu, H.; Gong, X.; Moriguchi, T. Polyamines function in stress tolerance: From synthesis to regulation. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Fortes, A.M.; Agudelo-Romero, P.; Pimentel, D.; Alkan, N. Transcriptional modulation of polyamine metabolism in fruit species under abiotic and biotic stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Shao, J.; Huang, K.; Batool, M.; Idrees, F.; Afzal, R.; Haroon, M.; Noushahi, H.A.; Wu, W.; Hu, Q.; Lu, X.; et al. Versatile roles of polyamines in improving abiotic stress tolerance of plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1003155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Tahjib-Ul-Arif, M.; Zahan, M.I.; Karim, M.M.; Imran, S.; Hunter, C.T.; Islam, M.S.; Mia, M.A.; Hannan, M.A.; Rhaman, M.S.; Hossain, M.A.; et al. Citric acid-mediated abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 7235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Raziq, A.; Din, A.M.U.; Anwar, S.; Wang, Y.; Jahan, M.S.; He, M.; Ling, C.G.; Sun, J.; Shu, S.; Guo, S. Exogenous spermidine modulates polyamine metabolism and improves stress responsive mechanisms to protect tomato seedlings against salt stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2022, 170, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Ndayiragije, A.; Lutts, S. Do exogenous polyamines have an impact on the response of a salt-sensitive rice cultivar to NaCl? J. Plant Physiol. 2006, 163, 506–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Ali, R.M. Role of putrescine in salt tolerance of Atropa belladonna plant. Plant Sci. 2000, 152, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Lutts, S.; Kinet, J.M.; Bouharmont, J. Ethylene production by leaves of rice (Oryza sativa L.) in relation to salinity tolerance and exogenous putrescine application. Plant Sci. 1996, 116, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Wang, Q.; Yin, X. Alleviative effects of different kinds of exogenous polyamines on salt injury of soybean seedlings. J. Henan Agric. Sci. 2014, 43, 48–55. [Google Scholar]
  125. Verma, S.; Mishra, S.N. Putrescine alleviation of growth in salt stressed Brassica juncea by inducing antioxidative defense system. J. Plant Physiol. 2005, 162, 669–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Hu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zou, Z.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, J. Effect of exogenous spermidine on polyamine content and metabolism in tomato exposed to salinity–alkalinity mixed stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 57, 200–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Pascual, L.S.; López-Climent, M.F.; Segarra-Medina, C.; Gómez-Cadenas, A.; Zandalinas, S.I. Exogenous spermine alleviates the negative effects of combined salinity and paraquat in tomato plants by decreasing stress-induced oxidative damage. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1193207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Talaat, N.B.; Shawky, B.T. Dual application of 24-epibrassinolide and spermine confers drought stress tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.) by modulating polyamine and protein metabolism. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2016, 35, 518–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Sánchez-Rodríguez, E.; Romero, L.; Ruiz, J.M. Accumulation of free polyamines enhanced antioxidant response in fruit of grafting tomato plants under water stress. J. Plant Physiol. 2016, 190, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Desoky, E.S.M.; Alharbi, K.; Rady, M.M.; Elnahal, A.S.M.; Selem, E.; Arnaout, S.M.A.I.; Selem, E.; Arnaout, S.M.A.I.; Mansour, E. Physiological, biochemical, anatomical, and agronomic responses of sesame to exogenously applied polyamines under different irrigation regimes. Agronomy 2023, 13, 875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Liu, Y.; Liang, H.; Lv, X.; Liu, D.; Wen, X.; Liao, Y. Effect of polyamines on the grain filling of wheat under drought stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 100, 113–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Montesinos-Pereira, D.; Barrameda-Medina, Y.; Romero, L.; Ruiz, J.M.; Sánchez-Rodríguez, E. Genotype differences in the metabolism of proline and polyamines under moderate drought in tomato plants. Plant Biol. 2014, 16, 1050–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Yiu, J.C.; Juang, L.D.; Fang, D.Y.T.; Liu, C.-W.; Wu, S.-J. Exogenous putrescine reduces flooding-induced oxidative damage by increasing the antioxidant properties of Welsh onion. Sci. Hortic. 2009, 120, 306–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Zhang, W.; Jiang, B.; Li, W.; Song, H.; Yu, Y.; Chen, J. Polyamines enhance chilling tolerance of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) through modulating antioxidative system. Sci. Hortic. 2009, 122, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Shen, W.; Nada, K.; Tachibana, S. Involvement of polyamines in the chilling tolerance of cucumber cultivars. Plant Physiol. 2000, 124, 431–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Song, Y.; Diao, Q.; Qi, H. Polyamine metabolism and biosynthetic genes expression in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) seedlings during cold acclimation. Plant Growth Regul. 2015, 75, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Mohammadi, H.; Ghorbanpour, M.; Brestic, M. Exogenous putrescine changes redox regulations and essential oil constituents in field-grown Thymus vulgaris L. under well-watered and drought stress conditions. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 118, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Hussain, S.; Farooq, M.; Wahid, M.; Wahid, A. Seed priming with putrescine improves the drought resistance of maize hybrids. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2013, 15, 1349–1353. [Google Scholar]
  139. Gao, H.; Huang, H.; Lu, K.; Wang, C.; Liu, X.; Song, Z.; Zhou, H.; Yang, L.; Li, B.; Yu, C.; et al. OsCYP714D1 improves plant growth and salt tolerance through regulating gibberellin and ion homeostasis in transgenic poplar. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 168, 447–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Napieraj, N.; Janicka, M.; Reda, M. Interactions of Polyamines and Phytohormones in Plant Response to Abiotic Stress. Plants 2023, 12, 1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Lightfoot, H.L.; Jonathan, H. Endogenous polyamine function—The RNA perspective. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, 11275–11290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Chauhan, J.; Srivastava, J.P.; Singhal, R.K.; Soufan, W.; Dadarwal, B.K.; Mishra, U.N.; Anuragi, H.; Rahman, M.A.; Sakran, M.I.; Brestic, M.; et al. EL: Alterations of Oxidative Stress Indicators, Antioxidant Enzymes, Soluble Sugars, and Amino Acids in Mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern and Coss.] in Response to Varying Sowing Time, and Field Temperature. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 875009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Sang, Q.Q.; Shu, S.; Shan, X.; Guo, S.R.; Sun, J. Effects of exogenous spermidine on antioxidant system of tomato seedlings exposed to high temperature stress. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2016, 63, 645–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Sang, Q.; Shan, X.; An, Y.; Shu, S.; Sun, J.; Guo, S. Proteomic analysis reveals the positive effect of exogenous spermidine in tomato seedlings’ response to high-temperature stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Mostofa, M.G.; Yoshida, N.; Fujita, M. Spermidine pretreatment enhances heat tolerance in rice seedlings through modulating antioxidative and glyoxalase systems. Plant Growth Regul. 2014, 73, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Menéndez, A.B.; Rodríguez, A.A.; Maiale, S.J.; Rodríguez-Kessler, M.; Jiménez-Bremont, J.F.; Ruiz, O.A. Polyamines contribution to the improvement of crop plants tolerance to abiotic stress. In Crop Improvement Under Adverse Conditions; Tuteja, N., Gill, S.S., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 113–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Alcázar, R.; Planas, J.; Saxena, T.; Zarza, X.; Bortolotti, C.; Cuevas, J.; Bitrián, M.; Tiburcio, A.F.; Altabella, T. Putrescine accumulation confers drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis plants over-expressing the homologous Arginine decarboxylase 2 gene. Plant Physiol. Bioch. 2010, 48, 547–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Chen, J. A starch- and ROS-regulating heat shock protein helps maintain male fertility in heat-stressed rice plants. Plant Physiol. 2023, 192, 2227–2229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wen, W.; Shi, Z.; Gu, Q.; Ahammed, G.J.; Cao, K.; Shah Jahan, M.; Shu, S.; Wang, J.; et al. Hydrogen peroxide mediates spermidine-induced autophagy to alleviate salt stress in cucumber. Autophagy 2021, 17, 2876–2890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Tian, X.; Liu, Y.; Huang, Z.; Duan, H.; Tong, J.; He, X.; Gu, W.; Ma, H.; Xiao, L. Comparative proteomic analysis of seedling leaves of cold-tolerant and -sensitive spring soybean cultivars. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2015, 42, 581–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Yang, Y.W.; Chen, H.C.; Jen, W.F.; Liu, L.Y.; Chang, M.C. Comparative transcriptome analysis of shoots and roots of TNG67 and TCN1 rice seedlings under cold stress and following subsequent recovery: Insights into metabolic pathways, phytohormones, and transcription factors. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0131391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Dametto, A.; Sperotto, R.A.; Adamski, J.M.; Blasi, E.Á.R.; Cargnelutti, D.; de Oliveira, L.F.V.; Ricachenevsky, F.K.; Fregonezi, J.N.; Mariath, J.E.A.; da Cruz, R.P.; et al. Cold tolerance in rice germinating seeds revealed by deep RNA-seq analysis of contrasting indica genotypes. Plant Sci. 2015, 238, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Espasandin, F.D.; Maiale, S.J.; Calzadilla, P.; Ruiz, O.A.; Sansberro, P.A. Transcriptional regulation of 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase (NCED) gene by putrescine accumulation positively modulates ABA synthesis and drought tolerance in Lotus tenuis plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2014, 76, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Cheng, L.; Sun, R.R.; Wang, F.Y.; Peng, Z.; Kong, F.L.; Wu, J.; Lu, G. Spermidine affects the transcriptome responses to high temperature stress in ripening tomato fruit. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2012, 13, 283–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Samanta, I.; Roy, P.C.; Das, E.; Mishra, S.; Chowdhary, G. Plant Peroxisomal Polyamine Oxidase: A Ubiquitous Enzyme Involved in Abiotic Stress Tolerance. Plants 2023, 12, 652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Liu, X.; Zeng, Y.; Zhang, X.; Tian, X.; Hasan, M.M.; Yao, G.; Fang, X. Polyamines inhibit abscisic acid-induced stomatal closure by scavenging hydrogen peroxide. Physiol. Plant. 2023, 175, e13903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Chu, G.; Chen, S.; Xu, C.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, D. Ethylene and polyamines interact in rice spikelet degeneration in response to water stress during meiosis. Plant Growth Regul. 2023, 101, 617–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Alsharafa, K.Y. Exploring the interplay of phytohormones and polyamines in drought-stressed Cress (Lepidium sativum) leaves. J. Biol. Res. 2023, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Nikhil, P.T.; Faiz, U.; Sharma, R.; Mohapatra, S. Modulation of plant polyamine and ethylene biosynthesis; and brassinosteroid signaling during Bacillus endophyticus J13-mediated salinity tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Plant Physiol. 2024, 301, 154304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Kaur-Sawhney, R.; Shih, L.M.; Cegielska, T.; Galston, A.W. Inhibition of protease activity by polyamines: Relevance for control of leaf senescence. FEBS Lett. 1982, 145, 345–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Murkowski, A. Heat stress and spermidine: Effect on chlorophyll fluorescence in tomato plants. Biol. Plant. 2001, 44, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Shi, H.; Ye, T.; Chan, Z. Comparative proteomic and physiological analyses reveal the protective effect of exogenous polyamines in the Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) response to salt and drought stresses. J. Proteome Res. 2013, 12, 4951–4964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Su, X.Q.; Wang, M.Y.; Shu, S.; Sun, J.; Guo, S.R. Effects of exogenous spermidine on the fast Chlorophyll fluorescence induction dynamics in tomato seedlings under high temperature stress. Chin. Acta Hortic. 2013, 40, 2409–2418. [Google Scholar]
  164. Shan, X.; Zhou, H.; Sang, T.; Shu, S.; Sun, J.; Guo, S. Effects of exogenous spermidine on carbon and nitrogen metabolism in tomato seedlings under high temperature. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2016, 141, 381–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Hassan, F.A.S.; Ali, E.F.; Alamer, K.H. Exogenous application of polyamines alleviates water stress-induced oxidative stress of Rosa damascena miller var. trigintipetala dieck. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2018, 116, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Berahim, Z.; Dorairaj, D.; Omar, M.H.; Saud, H.M.; Ismail, M.R. Spermine mediated improvements on stomatal features, growth, grain filling and yield of rice under differing water availability. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 10669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Severcan, F.; Gorgulu, G.; Gorgulu, S.T.; Guray, T. Rapid monitoring of diabetes-induced lipid peroxidation by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy: Evidence from rat liver microsomal membranes. Anal. Biochem. 2005, 339, 36–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Vinagre, C.; Madeira, D.; Narciso, L.; Cabral, H.N.; Diniz, M. Effect of temperature on oxidative stress in fish: Lipid peroxidation and catalase activity in the muscle of juvenile seabass, Dicentrarchus labrax. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 23, 274–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Berberich, T.; Sagor, G.H.M.; Kusano, T. Polyamines in plant stress response. In Polyamines; Kusano, T., Suzuki, H., Eds.; Springer: Tokyo, Japan, 2015; pp. 155–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Pál, M.; Szalai, G.; Janda, T. Speculation: Polyamines are important in abiotic stress signaling. Plant Sci. 2015, 237, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Nayyar, H.; Chander, S. Protective effects of polyamines against oxidative stress induced by water and cold stress in chickpea. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2004, 190, 355–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Mehta, R.A.; Cassol, T.; Li, N.; Ali, N.; Handa, A.K.; Mattoo, A.K. Engineered polyamine accumulation in tomato enhances phytonutrient content, juice quality, and vine life. Nat. Biotechnol. 2002, 20, 613–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Nambeesan, S.; Datsenka, T.; Ferruzzi, M.G.; Malladi, A.; Mattoo, A.K.; Handa, A.K. Overexpression of yeast spermidine synthase impacts ripening, senescence, and decay symptoms in tomato. Plant J. 2010, 63, 836–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Gao, F.; Mei, X.; Li, Y.; Guo, J.; Shen, Y. Update on the roles of polyamines in fleshy fruit ripening, senescence, and quality. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 610313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Tsaniklidis, G.; Kotsiras, A.; Tsafouros, A.; Roussos, P.A.; Aivalakis, G.; Katinakis, P.; Delis, C. Spatial and temporal distribution of genes involved in polyamine metabolism during tomato fruit development. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 100, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Mattoo, A.; Cassol, T.; Mehta, R.; Handa, A.; Ali, N.; Abdul-Baki, A. Genetic engineering of tomato fruit for sustained accumulation of polyamines during ripening to study their physiological role(s). Acta Hortic. 2002, 575, 157–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Ahanger, M.A.; Qin, C.; Maodong, Q.; Dong, X.X.; Ahmad, P.; Abd_Allah, E.F.; Zhang, L. Spermine application alleviates salinity-induced growth and photosynthetic inhibition in Solanum lycopersicum by modulating osmolyte and secondary metabolite accumulation and differentially regulating antioxidant metabolism. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 144, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The effect of high temperatures on the morphology, size, and structural characteristics of floral components. (A,B). Flowers with no evident stigma are shown under control (flower on left) and in heat (flower on right). (C). Accession displays heat sensitivity symptoms, such as style distortion and stigma exsertion (flower on right). (D). Displaying the exsertion of stigma above the anther cone in both control and heated environments. (E). Flower whose lengthy style protruded over the anthers’ visible level in the divided anthredial cone. (F). Flower without a dissection, which displays stigma. (G). High yield of stigmata-protruding, self-incompatible flowers in a regulated setting. (H,I): Exhibits exserted stigmata in conditions of high-temperature control and increased temperature, respectively [73].
Figure 1. The effect of high temperatures on the morphology, size, and structural characteristics of floral components. (A,B). Flowers with no evident stigma are shown under control (flower on left) and in heat (flower on right). (C). Accession displays heat sensitivity symptoms, such as style distortion and stigma exsertion (flower on right). (D). Displaying the exsertion of stigma above the anther cone in both control and heated environments. (E). Flower whose lengthy style protruded over the anthers’ visible level in the divided anthredial cone. (F). Flower without a dissection, which displays stigma. (G). High yield of stigmata-protruding, self-incompatible flowers in a regulated setting. (H,I): Exhibits exserted stigmata in conditions of high-temperature control and increased temperature, respectively [73].
Agriculture 15 00988 g001
Figure 2. Schematic presentation of PAs biosynthetic pathway for Put, Spd and Spm in plants and its relationships with ethylene biosynthesis [114].
Figure 2. Schematic presentation of PAs biosynthetic pathway for Put, Spd and Spm in plants and its relationships with ethylene biosynthesis [114].
Agriculture 15 00988 g002
Figure 3. Schematic presentation of main metabolic pathways regulated by Spd in tomato leaves exposed to high temperature stress [144].
Figure 3. Schematic presentation of main metabolic pathways regulated by Spd in tomato leaves exposed to high temperature stress [144].
Agriculture 15 00988 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Najafi, R.; Kappel, N.; Mozafarian, M. The Role of Exogenously Applied Polyamines to Improve Heat Tolerance in Tomatoes: A Review. Agriculture 2025, 15, 988. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15090988

AMA Style

Najafi R, Kappel N, Mozafarian M. The Role of Exogenously Applied Polyamines to Improve Heat Tolerance in Tomatoes: A Review. Agriculture. 2025; 15(9):988. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15090988

Chicago/Turabian Style

Najafi, Raheleh, Noémi Kappel, and Maryam Mozafarian. 2025. "The Role of Exogenously Applied Polyamines to Improve Heat Tolerance in Tomatoes: A Review" Agriculture 15, no. 9: 988. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15090988

APA Style

Najafi, R., Kappel, N., & Mozafarian, M. (2025). The Role of Exogenously Applied Polyamines to Improve Heat Tolerance in Tomatoes: A Review. Agriculture, 15(9), 988. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15090988

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop