Next Article in Journal
Can Agricultural Subsidies Reduce Cropland Abandonment in Rural China?
Next Article in Special Issue
Assessment of Integrated BMPs for Subbasin-Scale Soil Erosion Reduction Considering Spatially Distributed Farmland Characteristics
Previous Article in Journal
Fungal Diseases Integrated Management in Agriculture
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optimization of Tillage Operation Parameters to Enhance Straw Incorporation in Rice-Wheat Rotation Field
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Optimizing Lucerne Productivity and Resource Efficiency in China’s Yellow River Irrigated Region: Synergistic Effects of Ridge-Film Mulching and Controlled-Release Nitrogen Fertilization

College of Water Conservancy and Hydrpower Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2025, 15(8), 845; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15080845
Submission received: 10 March 2025 / Revised: 8 April 2025 / Accepted: 8 April 2025 / Published: 14 April 2025

Abstract

:
To address low productivity and water constraints in lucerne fields of China’s Gansu Yellow River Irrigation Region, this study optimized lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) cultivation through synergistic planting nitrogen regimes. A two-year field trial (2021–2022) evaluated three systems: ridge-furrow with ordinary mulch (PM), ridge-furrow with biodegradable mulch (BM), and conventional flat planting (FP), under four controlled-release N rates (0, 80, 160, 240 kg ha−1). Multidimensional assessments included growth dynamics, dry matter yield, forage quality (crude protein [CP], acid/neutral detergent fiber [ADF/NDF], relative feed value [RFV]), and resource efficiency metrics (water use efficiency [WUE], irrigation WUE [IWUE], partial factor productivity of N [PFPN], agronomic N use efficiency [ANUE]). The results showed the following: (1) Compared with conventional flat planting, ridge planting with film mulching significantly promoted lucerne growth, with ordinary plastic film providing a stronger effect than biodegradable film. Plant height and stem diameter exhibited a quadratic response to elevated nitrogen (N) application rates under identical planting patterns, peaking at intermediate N levels before declining with further increases. (2) Ridge planting with both ordinary plastic film and biodegradable film combined with an appropriate N rate improved lucerne yield and quality. In particular, the PMN2 treatment reached the highest value of yield (14,600 kg ha−1), CP (19.19%) and RFV (124.18), and the lowest value of ADF (29.63%) and NDF (48.86%), and all of them were significantly better than the other treatments (p < 0.05). (3) WUE, IWUE, PFPN, and ANUE followed the pattern PM > BM > FP. With increasing N application rates, WUE, IWUE, and ANUE initially rose and then declined, peaking under N2, whereas PFPN showed a decreasing trend and reached its maximum under N1. Principal component analysis revealed that ridge planting with ordinary plastic film combined with 160 kg·ha−1 N (PMN2) optimized lucerne performance, achieving balanced improvements in yield, forage quality, and water–nitrogen use efficiency. This regimen is recommended as the optimal strategy for lucerne cultivation in the Gansu Yellow River Irrigation Region and analogous ecoregions.

1. Introduction

Lucerne (Medicago sativa L.), a perennial high-quality leguminous forage, is known as the “King of Forage” because of its strong adaptability, high nutritional value and high grass yield [1,2]. Lucerne is widely planted around the world, especially in arid and semi-arid areas. Its developed root system and abundant leaves significantly increase the surface coverage, effectively reduce soil erosion and desertification of pastures, and also play an important role in the enhancement of soil fertility [3,4]. In recent years, China has implemented the policy of grain-to-feed conversion and encouraged the planting of high-quality pasture, and the planted area of lucerne has continued to expand, but its output and quality are still far lower than those of developed countries such as Europe and the United States [5]. Although lucerne has strong drought tolerance, its water consumption is large [6]. The main production areas of lucerne in China are mostly located in arid and semi-arid regions, where water scarcity and soil infertility seriously restrict the development of the pasture industry [7]. To address this issue, our research team previously explored the effects of conventional urea application in combination with flat crop planting (FP) or ridge planting with ordinary plastic film mulching (PM) on lucerne establishment year production performance [7]. However, three key gaps remain: (1) the long-term dynamics of perennial lucerne under multiple years of continuous cropping are still unclear; (2) the potential of controlled release nitrogen fertilizer (CRNF) to harmonize nutrient supply with crop demand has not yet been assessed; and (3) the feasibility of biodegradable mulches as an alternative to conventional plastic mulches still needs further validation. Therefore, in light of the resource characteristics of arid and semiarid areas, this study extends previous work by introducing CRNF and ridging biodegradable film. Our goal is to explore a reasonable lucerne planting and nitrogen (N) application strategy, to create a suitable growing environment, to promote the efficient use of lucerne water and fertilizer resources and increase yield and quality, and to promote the green and sustainable development of animal husbandry.
Moisture is an important external stress factor for plant life activities [8], and reasonable planting methods can reduce soil moisture evaporation and plant transpiration, thus improving crop production performance [9,10]. Ridge mulching technology reduces the ineffective evaporation of soil moisture through mulching, improves soil water retention capacity, and at the same time, improves soil temperature and day–night temperature difference, changing from “passive drought resistance” to “active drought resistance” [11,12,13]. Studies have shown that ridge mulching technology in dryland winter wheat planting showed good rainwater harvesting and moisture retention effect, and significantly increased the number of tillers, the number of spikes and the biomass of wheat [14]. In addition, ridge mulching can increase soil temperature by increasing surface area and solar radiation absorption through changing microtopography [15,16]. In European studies on fodder maize, mulching was found to significantly increase crop yield and improve quality [17]. However, the widespread use of plastic film has led to the accumulation of residual film in the soil, which degrades soil physical and chemical properties and nutrient status, resulting in “white pollution” [18]. To address this issue, new eco-friendly mulching materials, such as liquid films and biodegradable films, have been introduced. It has been found that liquid mulch improves soil permeability and water retention capacity by enhancing the aggregation of soil particles [19]. However, compared with traditional plastic mulch, biodegradable mulch still has a certain gap in the effect of yield increase [20]. Therefore, this study will evaluate the potential application of biodegradable mulch in lucerne cultivation to balance the agricultural benefits with environmental sustainability.
Nitrogen is an important nutrient element for plant growth and development, directly affecting photosynthetic efficiency, growth and metabolism [21]. Studies have shown that nitrogen fertilization can significantly increase lucerne plant height and yield and improve nutritional quality by reducing acid detergent fiber and neutral detergent fiber content and increasing crude protein and crude fat content [22]. Controlled release nitrogen fertilizer (CRNF) can further improve nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and reduce environmental pollution by slowly releasing nutrients that match crop uptake patterns compared to conventional urea [23]. In clay loam soils of eastern Canada, moderate application of controlled-release N fertilizer increased corn yields compared to pure urea [24]. In a study on ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) lawn, controlled-release N fertilizer significantly reduced N leaching and improved N fertilizer use efficiency [25]. Therefore, it is of great significance to explore the high yield, high quality and high efficiency grassland management model of lucerne by combining controlled release N fertilizer and ridge mulching technology.
Currently, ridge mulching technology is widely used in grain crops [26] and cash crops [27,28], but there are fewer studies for perennial forage grasses such as lucerne, especially the research on different materials of ridge mulching to regulate soil moisture conditions and coupled with controlled-release nitrogen fertilizers is not yet common. Gansu Yellow River Irrigation Region is an important area for lucerne cultivation in China, where the annual precipitation is lower than the national average, and water resources are scarce and inefficiently utilized; however, the area has good irrigation facilities, large diurnal temperature difference, and abundant light and heat resources, which are suitable for lucerne cultivation [29]. In view of this, this study was conducted on lucerne in the Gansu Yellow River Irrigation Region, aiming (1) to clarify the coupling relationship between the use of ordinary mulch on ridges, biodegradable mulch on ridges and flat planting without mulching, and controlled-release nitrogen application; (2) to quantify the multi-year effects of these integrated measures on lucerne growth, yield, quality and water and nitrogen use efficiency; and (3) to obtain the optimal planting and nitrogen management strategies to realize lucerne’s high yield, high quality, and high efficiency and reduce the environmental impacts. This will provide a technical reference for the sustainable cultivation of lucerne in the Gansu Yellow River Irrigation Region and similar arid ecosystems.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Overview of the Experimental Site

Field experiments were conducted during the growing seasons (April–October) of 2021 and 2022 at the Gansu Jingtai Chuan Electric Lifting Irrigation Water Resource Utilization Center Irrigation Experiment Station (37°23′ N, 104°08′ E; altitude 2028 m). The experimental site is characterized by an arid climate with long-term averages of 191.6 mm annual precipitation, 2761 mm evaporation, 2652 h sunshine duration, 6180 MJ·m−2 solar radiation, 8.5 °C mean air temperature, and 191 frost-free days.
The soil is classified as sandy loam with a bulk density of 1.45 g·cm−3, and the field capacity is 24.1% (on a mass basis). The topsoil (0–20 cm) properties were as follows: pH 8.11, organic matter 6.09 g·kg−1, total nitrogen 1.62 g·kg−1, total phosphorus 1.32 g·kg−1, total potassium 34.03 g·kg−1, available nitrogen 74.51 mg·kg−1, available phosphorus 26.31 mg·kg−1, and available potassium 173 mg·kg−1. According to the soil nutrient grading standards of the Second Soil Census of China, soil organic matter content and phosphorus content are poor, while nitrogen content is moderate, and potassium content is rich [30]. During the experimental periods, the total growing-season precipitation reached 147.43 mm (2021) and 170.46 mm (2022), with mean temperatures of 19.07 °C and 18.77 °C, respectively (Figure 1).

2.2. Experimental Design

The experiment was arranged in a completely randomized block design with two factors: (1) planting patterns—flat planting without mulching (FP), ridge planting with biodegradable film mulching (BM), and ridge planting with ordinary plastic film mulching (PM); and (2) controlled-release nitrogen (N) fertilizer rates—0 (N0), 80 (N1), 160 (N2), and 240 (N3) kg N ha−1 (Table 1). The test lucerne variety is “Longdong lucerne”, which has strong drought resistance, small and thick leaves, and low stomatal density, which helps to reduce water loss. This variety is able to maintain good growth under the condition of lack of soil moisture and has high yield and nutritional value. It is adapted to semi-arid climatic conditions and is suitable for cultivation within an altitude of 500–3500 m. Each treatment combination was replicated three times, resulting in 36 experimental plots (3 planting patterns × 4 N rates × 3 replicates). Individual plots measured 5.5 m × 7.8 m (42.9 m2). The ordinary mulch film used for the experiment was made of low-density polyethylene (LDPE) with a thickness of 0.008 mm and a light transmittance of 85–90%, while the biodegradable mulch film for ridges was made of starch-based composite liquid, and the thickness of the film was 0.005–0.008 mm after spraying into the film, with a light transmittance of 70–75%, and a disintegration rate of ≥90% within 60 d. The thickness of the film was 0.005–0.008 mm, and the light transmittance of the film was 70–75%. The width of both types of films was 100 cm. Before sowing we inoculated lucerne seeds by soaking them in a solution containing highly effective rhizobacteria (Sinorhizobia meliloti). The seeds were sown in April 2021, the land was leveled 10 d before sowing, and the seeds were manually sown in strips at a rate of 22.5 kg·ha−1 (1.0 to 1.2 × 107 seeds per hectare). After lucerne germination, the germination rate of lucerne was estimated by randomly selecting a one square meter area in each treatment. After averaging all the estimated values, the germination rate of lucerne reached more than 80%, which met the requirements of the experiment. In the PM and BM treatments, furrows were dug and ridges formed prior to sowing, and lucerne was planted along the ridge edges and in the furrows, with four total rows in the furrows at 20 cm spacing. In FP plots, the row spacing was 30 cm (Figure 2).
The integrated water and fertilizer drip irrigation system was designed. In PM and BM plots, drip lines were spaced 40 cm apart, while in FP plots, they were spaced 60 cm apart. All emitters across treatments were standardized with a nominal discharge rate of 2 L·h−1. Installation of shut-off valves and 0.001 m3 metering water meters in the main pipes of the irrigation network system in order to realize precise control of irrigation water quantity. The nitrogen fertilizer applied was a controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer (N, P2O5, and K2O mass percentages of 30%, 4%, and 6%, respectively) produced by Shandong Kingenta Ecological Engineering Group Co., Ltd. (Linyi, China), at a N application rate of 160 kg·ha–1. Phosphorus was supplied as superphosphate (40.0 kg·ha–1; 16% P2O5), and potassium as potassium sulfate (19.2 kg·ha–1; 50% K2O). All fertilizers were applied once before the first regrowth each year, and other field management practices followed the standard local procedures for lucerne fields. Lucerne was mowed at the initial flowering stage of each cut; two cuts were mowed in 2021, the establishment year, on 16 July and 5 October, and three cuts were mowed in 2022, on 29 May, 29 July, and 13 September, respectively.

2.3. Measurement Indicators and Calculation Methods

2.3.1. Plant Height and Stem Diameter (cm)

At each harvest event, ten representative lucerne plants with uniform growth and intact stems were randomly selected per plot. Plant height was measured as the vertical distance from the soil surface to the apical meristem of the primary stem using a graduated steel tape (1 mm accuracy). Stem diameter was determined at 5 cm above the soil surface on the primary stem with a digital caliper (±0.01 mm accuracy).

2.3.2. Yield and Quality

(1) Yield (Y, kg·ha–1)
Lucerne yield was determined using a 1 m × 1 m quadrat sampling method. At each harvest, homogeneous quadrats were selected within plots, and plants were cut 5 cm above ground using field scissors. After manual removal of non-target species, fresh weight was immediately recorded. Samples were oven-dried at 105 °C for 30 min (enzyme inactivation) followed by 75 °C until constant weight (<0.5% mass variation between consecutive weighings). Dry matter yield per hectare (kg·ha−1) was calculated using the area conversion factor (quadrat/plot ratio). Three biological replicates were performed for statistical reliability.
(2) Quality
The harvested samples were oven-dried at 75 °C, ground through a 40-mesh sieve (0.4 mm), and used for quality analysis. Crude protein (CP) content was determined by the Kjeldahl method using a fully automated nitrogen analyzer (Kjeltec™ 8400, FOSS, Höganäs, Sweden), with results expressed on a dry matter basis. Acid detergent fiber (ADF) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) were analyzed according to the Van Soest method [31] using a semi-automated fiber analyzer (F800, Ankom Technology, Fairport, New York, NY, USA). All measurements were performed in triplicate.
The relative feed value (RFV) was calculated as follows:
RFV = 120 / V NDF   ×   88.9     0.779 × V ADF / 1.29
In the formula, VNDF is neutral detergent fiber content (%), and VADF is acid detergent fiber content (%).

2.3.3. Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiency

(1) Water Consumption (ET, mm)
Evapotranspiration (ET) was calculated using the water balance method.
E T = 10 i = 1 n γ i H i ( θ i 1 θ i 2 ) + I + P + K R D
In the formula,
i is the index of the soil layer;
n is the total number of soil layers;
γi is the bulk density of the i-th soil layer (g cm–3);
Hi is the thickness of the i-th soil layer (cm);
θi1 and θi2 represent the soil moisture content (%) at the initial and final stages of the time period for the i-th soil layer, respectively, calculated as the mass percentage relative to dry-soil mass;
I is the irrigation amount (mm);
P is the precipitation (mm);
K is the groundwater recharge (mm);
R is the surface runoff (mm);
D is the deep percolation (mm).
Given that the experimental field is flat, the groundwater table is relatively deep, and each individual rainfall event is small; K, R, and D were considered negligible.
(2) Water Use Efficiency (WUE, kg·ha–1·mm–1)
W U E = Y / E T
Here, Y is the lucerne yield (kg·ha–1), and ET is the amount of water consumed (mm).
(3) Irrigation Water Use Efficiency (IWUE, kg·ha–1·mm–1)
I W U E = Y / I
(4) Partial Factor Productivity of Nitrogen (PFPN, kg kg–1)
P F P N = Y / F
Here, F is rate of N application (kg·ha–1).
(5) Agronomic Nitrogen Use Efficiency (ANUE, kg kg–1)
A N U E = Y N P K Y P K / F
Here, YNPK is the total annual lucerne yield under N-fertilized treatment (kg·ha–1); YPK is the total annual yield of lucerne in no N application treatment (kg·ha–1).

2.4. Data Analysis

Data organization was conducted using Microsoft Excel 2019. Statistical analyses were performed with IBM SPSS Statistics 26: (1) Plant height, stem diameter, yield, and water–nitrogen use efficiency across treatments were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Duncan’s multiple-range test (p < 0.05). (2) Two-way ANOVA (p < 0.05) was employed to evaluate the main effects of planting patterns and nitrogen application levels, along with their interaction effects. Data visualization was implemented using Origin 9.0.

3. Results

3.1. Growth Performance of Lucerne in Response to Planting and Nitrogen Application Patterns

3.1.1. Plant Height

Both planting pattern and nitrogen (N) application level significantly influenced lucerne plant height (p < 0.05), while their interaction effect was not significant (Figure 3). With successive harvests, plant height showed an overall decreasing trend, and in the corresponding harvests, plant height in 2022 was significantly greater than in 2021. Under the same N application level, plant height followed the order PM > BM > FP. Specifically, compared with FP, PM increased plant height by 11.38%, 12.81%, 15.30%, and 13.13% under N0, N1, N2, and N3, respectively; BM increased it by 3.8%, 4.49%, 4.14%, and 2.40%. Within each planting pattern, plant height ranked as N2 > N3 > N1 > N0. Under the N2 level, average plant height exceeded that of N0, N1, and N3 by 9.91–13.38%, 5.02–7.67%, and 3.59–3.79%, respectively. Among all treatments, PMN2 achieved the highest plant height, averaging 3.79–26.28% greater than other treatments.

3.1.2. Stem Diameter

Two-way ANOVA revealed significant main effects of cultivation patterns and nitrogen levels on lucerne stem diameter (p < 0.01), with no significant interaction effect (Figure 4). A progressive decline in stem diameter was observed with increasing cutting frequency across both experimental years (2021–2022). Under equivalent nitrogen inputs, stem diameter followed PM > BM > FP. Compared to FP, PM enhanced stem diameter by 23.08%, 24.15%, 34.01%, and 30.22% under N0-N3 gradients, while BM showed respective increases of 6.04%, 6.44%, 11.31%, and 11.30%. Stem diameter exhibited a quadratic response to increasing nitrogen rates, peaking at N2 (160 kg ha−1) with 17.40–27.83%, 8.64–17.27%, and 5.00–8.05% increases compared to N0, N1, and N3, respectively. The PMN2 treatment demonstrated maximum stem diameter enhancement, surpassing other treatments by 8.05–57.33%. This highlights the critical role of nitrogen-cultivation coordination in lucerne morphology regulation.

3.2. Yield and Quality of Lucerne in Response to Planting Nitrogen Application Patterns

3.2.1. Yield

Two-way ANOVA revealed a significant interaction effect between planting patterns and nitrogen application rates on lucerne annual yield (p < 0.05; Table 2), indicating that nitrogen fertilizer effects vary with different planting methods. Specifically, under ridge-covered ordinary film (PM), the optimal nitrogen application level (N2) synergistically enhanced yield, with annual yield significantly higher than other treatments. In contrast, excessive nitrogen application (N3) in flat planting (FP) and ridge-covered biodegradable film (BM) systems led to yield reduction (p < 0.05). From the main effects perspective, planting patterns significantly influenced yield (p < 0.01). Under equal nitrogen amounts, the PM system increased yield by 20.29% and 4.82% compared to FP and BM, respectively. Nitrogen application rates exhibited a single-peak response curve, with the N2 level reaching peak yield, increasing by 13.72–17.40%, 4.01–6.32%, and 1.89–4.01% compared to N0, N1, and N3 levels. Additionally, yield showed a systematic decline with increasing harvest times, but the PM-N2 combination maintained optimal performance across multiple harvests and total annual yield.

3.2.2. Quality

Two-way ANOVA revealed highly significant main effects of planting patterns and nitrogen application rates on lucerne quality parameters (CP, ADF, NDF, RFV) (p < 0.01, Figure 5), with significant interaction effects on CP, ADF, and RFV (p < 0.05). Under the same planting pattern, increasing nitrogen application (N0–N3) resulted in single-peak curves for CP and RFV (peak at N2), while ADF and NDF showed valley trends (lowest at N2). At fixed nitrogen levels, PM and BM systems demonstrated significantly higher CP and RFV compared to FP, with significantly lower ADF and NDF. The PMN2 treatment (ridge-covered film + 160 kg·ha−1) achieved the highest CP (19.19%) and RFV (124.18), with the lowest ADF (29.63%) and NDF (48.86%), significantly outperforming all other treatments (p < 0.05). The results indicate that synergistic regulation of planting patterns and nitrogen fertilization can significantly optimize lucerne quality, with PMN2 representing the optimal combination.

3.3. Lucerne Water and Nitrogen Utilization in Response to Planting Nitrogen Application Patterns

The interaction between planting pattern and nitrogen application on WUE, PFPN, and ANUE was significant (p < 0.05), and planting pattern and nitrogen application level highly significantly affected lucerne WUE, PFPN, and ANUE (p < 0.01) (Table 3). At the same nitrogen application level, lucerne WUE, IWUE, PFPN, and ANUE showed PM > BM > FP; WUE and IWUE increased by an average of 80.59%, 19.9%, and 27.43%, 4.66% for PM and BM, respectively, compared with FP. The main effect of nitrogen application showed that the WUE, IWUE, and ANUE of lucerne showed a trend of increasing and then decreasing with increasing nitrogen application, and reached the maximum value under N2 conditions (p < 0.05), whereas the PFPN decreased linearly with increasing nitrogen, and the N1 was significantly higher than the N2 and N3 (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the PM mode combined with the N2 level could synergistically improve the efficiency of water nitrogen utilization.

3.4. Comprehensive Evaluation

3.4.1. Correlation Analysis

Pearson correlation analysis (Figure 6) revealed significant interparameter correlations among agronomic traits (plant height, stem diameter, yield), forage quality indices (ADF, NDF, CP, RFV), water–nitrogen use efficiencies (WUE, IWUE), and nitrogen response parameters (PFPN, ANUE) under contrasting cultivation-nitrogen regimes. The correlation coefficients between most of the indicators are above 0.500 or below −0.500, suggesting strong positive and negative correlations between indicators. Plant height exhibits a strong positive correlation with stem diameter (r = 0.73) and yield (r = 0.70), while ADF shows a strong negative correlation with CP (r = −0.62) and RFV (r = −0.72). Such correlations indicate that increases in some indicators are associated with proportional increases in others, whereas increases in some indicators are linked to decreases in others. Therefore, principal component analysis (PCA) was used for comprehensive evaluation of these variables.

3.4.2. Principal Component Analysis

As shown in the PCA results (Figure 7a), the variance contribution rates of Principal Component 1 (PC1) and Principal Component 2 (PC2) were 79.7% and 12.2%, respectively, with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 91.9%. This suggests that the two principal components explain the majority of the variation in forage-related indicators. ADF and NDF exhibited significant negative correlations with the other indicators (Figure 7a). The comprehensive scores of each treatment were ranked (Figure 7b), revealing that, among the three planting patterns, PM had the highest comprehensive score; among the four nitrogen application levels, N2 had the highest comprehensive score; and among all treatments, PMN2 achieved the highest comprehensive score, indicating it was the optimal planting and nitrogen application strategy.

4. Discussion

4.1. Synergistic Promotion Effects of Different Cropping Patterns and Nitrogen Application on Lucerne Growth

In agricultural ecosystems, the combination of ridge-furrow tillage and ridge mulching techniques has been proven to effectively regulate precipitation distribution, optimize soil microenvironments, and promote crop growth [32]. Specifically, mulching reduces soil surface evaporation, increases soil moisture content in the furrows, and creates a more favorable water environment for crop roots. The insulating properties of the mulch stabilize soil temperature fluctuations in the furrows, providing a stable microclimate for root activity. Additionally, ridge-furrow structures help reduce nutrient runoff losses and enhance nutrient use efficiency [33]. This study investigated the effects of this technique on lucerne growth and further analyzed the regulatory role of different nitrogen application rates.
The results showed that at the same nitrogen application level, compared with FP, PM increased plant height and stem diameter by 11.38–15.30% and 23.08–34.01%, respectively, while BM increased them by 2.40–4.45% and 6.04–11.31%, respectively. This result is similar to the findings of Beres et al. [34] in Canada, who found that covering biodegradable film promotes the growth and development of silage maize and consequently increases its plant height compared to no film. Similarly, Yu et al. [35] in the alpine region of Gannan found that ridge-furrow mulching significantly increased lucerne stem diameter (2.70 mm) compared to conventional planting (1.30 mm), with plant height increasing by 1.36 and 2.13 times compared to ridge planting and conventional planting, respectively. Nitrogen application rate exerted significant regulatory effects on lucerne growth architecture. Moderate nitrogen supply enhanced root hydraulic conductivity and dehydrogenase activity, thereby improving rhizosphere nutrient interception and mass flow-driven nutrient acquisition, which jointly promoted morphological development including plant height and stem diameter [36]. Lu et al. [37] documented in coastal saline-alkali soils that lucerne plant height followed a unimodal curve peaking at 225 kg ha−1 N input. In our study, it was found that plant height and stem diameter showed similar secondary responses to the nitrogen application gradient (0–240 kg ha−1), but the optimal threshold was moved down to 160 kg ha−1 (N2). The primary reason for this difference may be the significantly lower annual precipitation (about 150 mm) in the experimental site of this study compared to 1042.2 mm in Lu et al.’s study. Under such arid conditions, moderate nitrogen application significantly improved lucerne’s water and nutrient use efficiency. Additionally, the soil in this study contained relatively high nitrogen levels, and excessive nitrogen application may have caused nutrient imbalances, ultimately inhibiting lucerne growth. In conclusion, the combination of ridge-furrow mulching technology and an appropriate nitrogen application rate can effectively improve the soil microenvironment and promote lucerne growth and development.

4.2. Effect of Cropping Pattern and Nitrogen Application on Yield and Quality of Lucerne

Forage yield, as a key productivity indicator of the grassland ecosystem, comprehensively reflects the crop’s adaptation to environmental stress and resource use efficiency [35]. The formation of lucerne hay yield is driven by transpiration throughout its growth cycle and is closely related to plant growth status, soil moisture conditions, and light-temperature environments [38]. Ridge-furrow mulching improves yield by altering soil moisture content, soil temperature, soil nutrients, wind speed, and solar radiation within the furrows [39,40]. Our study found that both ridge-furrow planting with ordinary plastic film (PM) and biodegradable film (BM) produced significantly higher yields than flat planting without mulching (FP). Farrell et al. [17] in Northern Ireland found that mulched conditions significantly increased fodder maize yields compared to open conditions, aligning with our findings. It is worth noting that the three harvests of lucerne in this study followed a decreasing yield gradient: first cut > second cut > third cut. This could be attributed to the physical deterioration of ordinary plastic film and the progressive degradation of biodegradable film over the growing season (60–70 days to initiate degradation). Biodegradable films show comparable rainwater and moisture retention effects as ordinary films during the first growing season, but their biodegradable characteristics avoid the risk of residual pollution from agricultural films and make them more friendly to the environment [41]. Our study found that lucerne yield showed an increasing and then decreasing trend with increasing N application, and excessive N application was not favorable to lucerne yield increase, which is consistent with Oliveira et al.’s [42] finding in South America that lucerne yield was not promoted by annual N application of 450 kg ha−1. Therefore, it is significant to balance the nutritional effects between two nitrogen sources, exogenous nitrogen application and autochthonous rhizomatous nitrogen fixation in lucerne fields. In addition, the increase in N application to 160 kg ha−1 did significantly increase lucerne yield in this study, but the increase in yield was relatively small compared to 80 kg ha−1, and therefore, the economic benefits of further increasing the N application rate may be limited. Meanwhile, high N doses may lead to environmental pollution, including nitrogen loss and greenhouse gas emissions, etc. We will further explore the combined effects of different N application rates on lucerne yield and environmental impacts in future studies to provide more comprehensive and scientific fertilization recommendations.
The optimization of forage quality depends on increasing crude protein (CP) content while effectively regulating fiber components (ADF, NDF) [43]. This two-year field experiment revealed that, compared to FP, PM and BM combined with an appropriate nitrogen application rate significantly improved lucerne quality. In particular, the PMN2 treatment had the highest values of CP and RFV, and the lowest values of ADF and NDF, and all of them were significantly better than the other treatments (p < 0.05). These findings align with the meta-analysis by Yin et al. [44], which demonstrated that nitrogen application significantly increased CP content by an average of 7.3% while reducing ADF and NDF contents by 5.60% and 3.00%, respectively, compared to non-fertilized controls. Additionally, this study found that the effect of nitrogen application on quality indicators exhibited a threshold effect: With the rise of nitrogen application, the CP content and RFV rose at first and then declined. In contrast, the ADF and NDF contents showed a downward trend initially and subsequently rose. This dose–response mechanism can be explained as follows: Moderate nitrogen supply activates key enzymes such as glutamine synthetase, thereby promoting nitrogen assimilation and protein synthesis [45]. The enhanced soil moisture retention in mulched systems inhibits cell wall lignification, reducing structural carbohydrate accumulation [46]. During the early growth stage, when root nodules are not yet fully capable of nitrogen fixation, exogenous nitrogen effectively compensates for plant nitrogen demand [47]. In addition, the lucerne RFVs derived in this study show that the lucerne is a medium quality feed, and therefore more suitable for feeding animal groups such as calves aged 12–18 months, beef cows and their calves, as well as dairy cows during dry milking period, which have moderate RFV requirements for lucerne, and which are able to efficiently utilize the nutritive value of lucerne to promote their healthy growth [48].
Although PM has shown significant advantages in improving lucerne yield and quality, its potential environmental impacts cannot be ignored. The widespread use of ordinary films may lead to microplastic contamination, which can penetrate into the soil and crops, posing a threat to ecosystems and food security. In contrast, the use of BM can effectively reduce residual pollution from agricultural films and provide technical support for sustainable agricultural management. However, the high cost of BM may be an obstacle to their large-scale dissemination. Therefore, environmental benefits and economic costs need to be considered comprehensively when choosing cultivation patterns. In addition, besides nitrogen fertilizer application, phosphorus and potassium fertilizers also have irreplaceable roles in lucerne growth and development, and subsequently we also plan to study the effects of synergistic effects of different fertilizers on lucerne production performance.

4.3. Improvement Effects of Optimized Cropping Pattern and Precision Nitrogen Application on Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Lucerne

Appropriate planting and nitrogen application patterns play a significant role in improving lucerne’s water and nitrogen use efficiency. WUE reflects the efficiency of water transformation into energy during crop physiological processes, while IWUE measures the contribution of irrigation water to dry matter accumulation [49,50]. PFPN indicates the fertilizer cost required to produce a given amount of product, while ANUE is a more precise indicator for evaluating the yield-increasing benefits of nitrogen fertilizer [51,52]. Ridge-furrow mulching effectively captures precipitation, enhances soil water and nitrogen availability, promotes plant growth and nitrogen uptake, and improves water use efficiency. Huo et al. [53] conducted a study on lucerne in a semi-arid region and found that, compared with FP, PM and BM increased average WUE by 35% and 31%, respectively. This study further confirmed these findings. Under the same nitrogen application conditions, compared with FP, PM and BM treatments increased WUE, IWUE, PFPN and ANUE over two growing seasons. The nitrogen application rate also had a significant impact on lucerne’s water and nitrogen use efficiency. Feng et al. [54] reported that WUE initially increased and then decreased with increasing nitrogen levels, with 80 kg·ha–1 nitrogen being more beneficial for root water and nutrient uptake than 120 kg·ha–1. Similarly, in Pakistan, Abbasi et al. [55] found that the highest nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency in maize was achieved at 90 kg·ha–1 of nitrogen application and it showed a decreasing trend with the increase in nitrogen fertilizer application. This study demonstrated that as nitrogen application increased, WUE, IWUE, and ANUE initially increased and then decreased, reaching their highest values under N2 (160 kg·ha–1), while PFPN showed a decreasing trend, peaking at N1 (80 kg·ha–1). The results indicate that although nitrogen application at 80 kg·ha–1 achieved the highest PFPN, its WUE, IWUE, and ANUE were significantly lower than those at 160 kg·ha–1. This may be because the experimental site had poor soil fertility, and nitrogen limitation had a stronger influence on lucerne growth than planting patterns. Moderate nitrogen application significantly boosted yield, but further increases in nitrogen led to a slight decline in yield response, causing PFPN to decrease accordingly. Overall, the highest water and nitrogen use efficiency was observed under the PMN2 treatment (ridge-furrow planting with ordinary plastic film + 160 kg·ha–1 nitrogen application). This result highlights the importance of selecting an appropriate planting pattern and nitrogen application rate in practical agricultural production to achieve efficient utilization of water and nitrogen resources while maximizing crop yield.
In large-scale lucerne cultivation, mechanized management is a necessary means to achieve efficient production. As the level of intelligence and mechanization matures, in order to solve the problems of mechanized harvesting and film management, it is necessary to develop lucerne harvesters equipped with precision cutting devices and automatic row-alignment functions, so that they can be effectively adapted to the topography of ridges and reduce the interference with the soil and crops. The difficulty of mechanized operation can be further reduced by optimizing the design of the irrigation system (rational layout) and adjusting the time of harvesting operation (e.g., when the soil is dry after irrigation). Second, to avoid damage to the film from mechanical operations, it is recommended that the equipment be adjusted prior to harvesting to ensure smooth operation, or that more efficient and environmentally friendly biodegradable films be developed. Film recycling can be carried out by a combination of mechanization (collecting most of the film debris) and manual assistance (supplemental processing of the parts that are difficult to mechanically recycle), while encouraging the research, development and promotion of more efficient agricultural film recycling machinery and technology.

5. Conclusions

This study demonstrated that the ridge-mulching system significantly increased lucerne productivity compared to conventional flat planting (FP), with ordinary mulch (PM) being superior to biodegradable mulch (BM) in terms of synergistic effects. At 160 kg ha−1 (N2), lucerne plant height and stem thickness reached the peak, and the PMN2 treatment (ridge-furrow ordinary mulch + 160 kg ha−1 N) achieved the optimization of morphology and yield-quality, with a significant increase in yield, crude protein, and relative feeding value, and simultaneous decrease in acidic and neutral detergent fiber fractions, and optimal water and nitrogen use efficiency, which is a suitable planting and nitrogen application mode for lucerne production in the Gansu Yellow River Irrigation Region and analogous ecoregions.
However, this study has geographical limitations, it does not quantify the long-term ecological risks of PM-treated microplastics and the impact of BM degradation products, and the suitability of ridge mulching with mechanized harvesting needs to be optimized. In the future, we plan to validate the adaptability to multiple climatic zones and develop equipment adapted to ridge and furrow harvesting in order to minimize the mechanical damage to the mulch caused by multiple mowing. In addition, policy guidance is needed to gradually shift to biodegradable film mulching in order to balance production efficiency and environmental sustainability.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.J. and Y.M.; methodology, Y.L., M.Y., G.H., J.C. and B.L.; formal analysis, M.Y., X.F., Q.L., J.Z. and Y.S.; resources, G.Q. and Y.K.; writing—original draft preparation, M.Y.; writing—review and editing, Y.J., H.L. and Y.W.; supervision, Y.M.; project administration, Y.M. and Y.K.; funding acquisition, G.Q. and M.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by Gansu Agricultural University Fifth Batch of “Fuxi Young Talents” Project (Grant No. Gaufx-05Y11); the National Natural Science Foundation Project, China (Grant Nos. 52069001 and 52269009); Gansu Agricultural University Youth Mentor Support Fund Project (Grant No. GAU-QDFC-2023-12); Gansu Province Higher School Innovation Fund Project (Grant No. 2023A-054); Key Research and Development Project of Gansu Province (Grant No. 22YF7NA110); Gansu Agricultural University, “Innovation of Efficient Utilization of Soil and Water Resources for Specialty Crops in Northwest Arid Regions” Discipline Team Building Special Project (Grant No. GAU-XKTD-2022-09); Gansu Province University Innovation Fund Project (Grant No. 2025CXZX-794).

Data Availability Statement

All data supporting this study are included in the article.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to the Irrigation Experiment Station of Jingtaichuan Electric Power Irrigation Water Resource Utilization Center, Gansu Province, for supporting this study, and thanks to the editors and reviewers for your valuable and constructive comments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Liu, J.; Lu, F.; Zhu, Y.; Wu, H.; Ahmad, I.; Dong, G.; Zhou, G.; Wu, Y. The effects of planting density and nitrogen application on the growth quality of alfalfa forage in saline soils. Agriculture 2024, 14, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Altınok, S.; Yurtseven, E.; Avcı, S.; Öztürk, H.S.; Selenay, M.F. The effects of different irrigation water salinities and leaching ratios on green and dry forage yields of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Agricult. Forestry. 2015, 61, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Osterholz, W.R.; Renz, M.; Jokela, W.E.; Grabber, J.H. Interseeded alfalfa reduces soil and nutrient runoff losses during and after corn silage production. J. Soil Water Conserv. 2019, 12, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gu, Y.-J.; Han, C.-L.; Kong, M.; Shi, X.-Y.; Zdruli, P.; Li, F.-M. Plastic film mulch promotes high alfalfa production with phosphorus-saving and low risk of soil nitrogen loss. Field Crops Res. 2018, 229, 44–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wan, W.; Li, Y.; Li, H. Yield and quality of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) in response to fertilizer application in China: A meta-analysis. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 1051725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lu, J.Y.; Xiong, J.B.; Zhang, H.S.; Tian, H.; Yang, H.M.; Liu, Y. Effects of water stress on yield, quality and trace element composition of alfalfa. Acta Pratac. Sin. 2020, 29, 126–133. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lv, Y.; Wang, J.; Yin, M.; Kang, Y.; Ma, Y.; Jia, Q.; Qi, G.; Jiang, Y.; Lu, Q.; Chen, X. Effects of planting and nitrogen application patterns on alfalfa yield, quality, water-nitrogen use efficiency, and economic benefits in the Yellow River irrigation region of Gansu Province, China. Water 2023, 15, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rahman, A.; Yong-Goo, K.; Iftekhar, A.; Liu, G.-S.; Hyoshin, L.; Joo, L.J.; Byung-Hyun, L. Proteome analysis of alfalfa roots in response to water deficit stress. J. Integr. Agric. 2016, 15, 1275–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, Q.; Zhang, E.; Li, F.; Li, F. Runoff efficiency and the technique of micro-water harvesting with ridges and fur-rows, for potato production in semi-arid areas. Water Resour. Manag. 2008, 22, 1431–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, F.M.; Wang, P.; Wang, J.; Xu, J.Z. Effects of irrigation before sowing and plastic film mulching on yield and water uptake of spring wheat in semiarid Loess Plateau of China. Agric. Water Manag. 2004, 67, 77–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kou, J.T.; Shi, S.L.; Cai, Z.S. Effects of ridge and furrow rainfall harvesting on growth characteristics and quality of Medicago sativa in dryland. China Agric. Sci. 2010, 43, 5028–5036. [Google Scholar]
  12. Xie, J.; Wang, L.; Li, L.; Anwar, S.; Luo, Z.; Zechariah, E.; Fudjoe, S.K. Yield, economic benefit, soil water balance, and water use efficiency of intercropped maize/potato in responses to mulching practices on the semiarid loess plateau. Agriculture 2021, 11, 1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, X.E.; Li, X.G.; Hai, L.; Wang, Y.P.; Fu, T.T.; Turner, N.C.; Li, F.M. Film-mulched ridge–furrow management increases maize productivity and sustains soil organic carbon in a dryland cropping system. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2014, 78, 1434–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Li, T.L.; Xie, Y.H.; Ren, M.M.; Deng, S.Y.; Dan, J.; Lei, Z.Y.; Hong, J.P.; Wang, C.H. Effects of fertilization and plastic film mulched ridge-furrow cultivation on yield and water and nitrogen utilization of winter wheat on dryland. Ecol. J. 2011, 31, 212–220. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wang, T.H.; Li, Y.N. Effect of furrow planting winter wheat with plastic film mulching on water-use efficiency and soil temperature. China Rural. Water Hydropower. 2011, 1, 46–49. [Google Scholar]
  16. Song, Z.; Guo, J.; Zhang, Z.; Kou, T.; Deng, A.; Zheng, C.; Ren, J.; Zhang, W. Impacts of planting systems on soil moisture, soil temperature and corn yield in rainfed area of Northeast China. Eur. J. Agron. 2013, 50, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Farrell, A.D.; Gilliland, T.J. Yield and quality of forage maize grown under marginal climatic conditions in Northern Ireland. Grass Forage Sci. 2011, 66, 214–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, E.K.; He, W.Q.; Yan, C.R. ‘White revolution’ to ‘white pollution’—Agricultural plastic film mulch in China. Environ. Res. Lett. 2014, 9, 091001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yin, G.H.; Hao, L.; Zhao, Y.H.; Gu, J.; Liu, Z.X. Effects of hydromulching on soil water availability. Chin. J. Ecol. 2013, 32, 1405–1411. [Google Scholar]
  20. Li, H.; Chang, W. Exploring optimal film mulching to enhance potato yield in China: A meta-analysis. Agron. J. 2021, 113, 4099–4115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Laura, M.L.; Scott, L.C.; Amaris, L.S.; Yang, X.; Michael, F.A.; Edith, B.A. Above- and belowground responses to nitrogen addition in a Chihuahuan Desert grassland. Oecologia 2011, 169, 177–185. [Google Scholar]
  22. Liu, X.J.; Liu, Y.N.; Kuai, J.L.; Qi, M.X.; Zhang, X.L. Effects of different N levels on productivity and quality of alfalfa varieties. Acta Agrestia Sin. 2013, 21, 702–707. [Google Scholar]
  23. Geng, J.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, M.; Li, C.; Yang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Li, S. The Long-term effects of controlled release urea application on crop yields and soil fertility under rice-oilseed rape rotation system. Field Crops Res. 2015, 184, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tubeileh, A.M.-S.; Alam-Eldein, S.M.; Banks, S. Effect of polymer-coated urea/urea blends on corn yields under short growing season conditions in Eastern Canada. Agronomy 2023, 13, 695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, H.; Zhang, M.; Yin, X.H.; Fu, W. Nitrogen leaching loss of controlled-release fertilizers on ryegrass turfgrass. J. Soil Water Conserv. 2009, 23, 017. [Google Scholar]
  26. Zhang, R.; Zhang, H.; Xing, Y.; Xue, L. Optimizing plastic film mulch to improve the yield and water use efficiency of dryland maize in the Loess Plateau, China. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0308706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhao, H.; Wang, R.-Y.; Ma, B.-L.; Xiong, Y.-C.; Qiang, S.-C.; Wang, C.-L.; Liu, C.-A.; Li, F.-M. Ridge-furrow with full plastic film mulching improves water use efficiency and tuber yields of potato in a semiarid rainfed ecosystem. Field Crops Res. 2014, 161, 137–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhou, L.-M.; Zhang, F.; Liu, C.-A. Improved yield by harvesting water with ridges and subgrooves using buried and surface plastic mulches in a semiarid area of China. Soil Tillage Res. 2015, 150, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, D.D.; Wang, Y.R.; Han, Y.H. Effects of irrigation frequency and fertilizer rate on alfalfa seed yields in the Yellow River irrigated region. Acta Prataculturae Sin. 2016, 25, 154–163. [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhang, Z.Q.; Jiao, J.Y.; Chen, T.D.; Chen, Y.L.; Lin, H.; Xu, Q.; Cheng, Y.Z.; Zhao, W.T. Soil nutrient evaluation of alluvial fan in the middle and lower reaches of Lhasa River Basin. J. Plant Nutr. Fertil. 2022, 28, 2082–2096. [Google Scholar]
  31. Van Soest, P.J.; Robertson, J.B.; Lewis, B.A. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy. Sci. 1991, 74, 3583–3597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, N.; Zhou, C.; Sun, X.; Jing, J.; Tian, X.; Wang, L. Effects of ridge tillage and mulching on water availability, grain yield, and water use efficiency in rain-fed winter wheat under different rainfall and nitrogen conditions. Soil Tillage Res. 2018, 179, 86–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Xin, X.; Sun, Z.; Xiao, J.; Bai, W.; Zhang, Z.; Yan, H. Efficient utilization mechanism of soil moisture and nutrients with ridge film furrow seeding technology of sloping farmlands in semi-arid and rain-fed areas. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Beres, B.L.; Stevenson, F.C. Feasibility of bioplastic mulch systems to stimulate early seed germination and plant growth for corn silage hybrids. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2015, 95, 1229–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yu, X.J.; Chai, J.L.; Xu, C.L.; Shi, S.L.; Xiao, H.; Ma, L.X.; Cao, G.S. Effects of different planting methods on growth of alfalfa and weeds in Gannan Alpine Region. Scientia Agric. Sin. 2016, 49, 791–801. [Google Scholar]
  36. Kang, Y.; Qi, G.; Jia, Q.; Wang, A.; Yin, M.; Ma, Y.; Wang, J.; Jiang, Y.; Tang, Z. Appropriate water-nitrogen regulation mode to improve productivity of mixed-sowing grassland of bromus inermis and alfalfa. Water 2023, 15, 1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lu, F.G.; Gu, L.F.; Liu, Y.Q.; Ren, Z.; Shi, Y.; Xu, Z.R.; Zhou, G.S.; Lu, H.T.; Wang, X.S.; Zhang, W.D.; et al. Interaction effects of plant density and nitrogen rate on the growth and physiological traits of alfalfa in saline alkali soils. Acta Prataculturae Sin. 2021, 38, 1570–1578. [Google Scholar]
  38. Kamran, M.; Yan, Z.; Jia, Q.; Chang, S.; Ahmad, I.; Ghani, M.U.; Hou, F. Irrigation and nitrogen fertilization influence on alfalfa yield, nutritive value, and resource use efficiency in an arid environment. Field Crops Res. 2022, 284, 108587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Qin, S.; Zhang, J.; Dai, H.; Wang, D.; Li, D. Effect of ridge-furrow and plastic-mulching planting patterns on yield formation and water movement of potato in a semi-arid area. Agric. Water Manag. 2014, 131, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cheng, J.; Wan, H.; Wang, J. Alfalfa growth and its relation with soil water status in loess hilly and gully region. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2005, 16, 435–438. [Google Scholar]
  41. Moreno, M.; Moreno, A. Effect of different biodegradable and polyethylene mulches on soil properties and production in a tomato crop. Sci. Hortic. 2008, 116, 256–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. de Oliveira, W.S.; Oliveira, P.P.A.; Corsi, M.; Duarte, F.R.S.; Tsai, S.M. Alfalfa yield and quality as function of nitrogen fertilization and symbiosis with Sinorhizobium meliloti. Sci. Agric. 2004, 61, 433–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, S.; Liu, Z. Fertilisation and environmental factors affect the yield and quality of alfalfa in China. Plant Soil Environ. 2024, 70, 276–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yin, M.H.; Ma, Y.L.; Kang, Y.X.; Jia, Q.; Qi, G.P.; Wang, J.H. Effects of nitrogen application on alfalfa yield and quality in China-A Meta-analysis. Acta Prataculturae Sin. 2022, 31, 36–49. [Google Scholar]
  45. Fan, X.; Lu, C.; Khan, Z.; Li, Z.; Duan, S.; Shen, H.; Fu, Y. Mixed ammonium-nitrate nutrition regulates enzymes, gene expression, and metabolic pathways to improve nitrogen uptake, partitioning, and utilization efficiency in rice. Plants 2025, 14, 611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Koskei, K.; Munyasya, A.N.; Wang, Y.B.; Zhao, Z.Y.; Zhou, R.; Indoshi, S.N.; Wang, W.; Cheruiyot, W.K.; Mburu, D.M.; Nyende, A.B.; et al. Effects of increased plastic film residues on soil properties and crop productivity in agro-ecosystem. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 414, 125521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gao, F.; Gao, T.G.; Zhu, B.C. Research progress on effects of nitrogen application on soybean nodulation, nitrogen fixation and yield. Jiangsu J. Agric. Sci. 2022, 50, 42–48. [Google Scholar]
  48. Miguel, C.; Shannon, D. Forage Quality: Concepts and Practices; North Carolina State University: Raleigh, NC, USA, 2014; p. AG-792. [Google Scholar]
  49. Hassanli, A.M.; Ebrahimizadeh, M.A.; Beecham, S. The effects of irrigation methods with effluent and irrigation scheduling on water use efficiency and corn yields in an arid region. Agric. Water Manag. 2009, 96, 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Qian, Z.H.; Han, B.F.; Liu, Z.T.; Cai, W.; Fu, B.Z.; Ma, H.B. Effects of infiltration irrigation on growth characters and water use efficiency of alfalfa in the Ningxia Yellow River diversion irrigation area. Acta Pratac. Sin. 2020, 29, 147–156. [Google Scholar]
  51. Wu, L.F.; Zhang, F.C.; Zhou, H.M.; Suo, Y.S.; Xue, F.D.; Zhou, J.W.; Liang, F. Effect of drip irrigation and fertilizer application on water use efficiency and cotton yield in North of Xinjiang. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2014, 30, 137–146. [Google Scholar]
  52. Govindasamy, P.; Muthusamy, S.K.; Bagavathiannan, M.; Mowrer, J.; Jagannadham, P.T.K.; Maity, A.; Halli, H.M.; Sujayananad, G.K.; Vadivel, R.; Das, T.K.; et al. Nitrogen use efficiency—A key to enhance crop productivity under a changing climate. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1121073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Huo, H.L.; Wang, Q.; Shi, S.L.; Ren, X.; Wang, H.L.; Wang, T.T.; Liu, Q.L. Effects of different rainwater harvesting planting methods on alfalfa cultivation in arid areas. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2013, 24, 2770–2778. [Google Scholar]
  54. Feng, M.; Yu, C.; Lin, L.G.; Wu, D.Q.; Song, R.; Liu, H.X. Effects of water and nitrogen fertilizer on biomass distribution and water use efficiency of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) in Hexi Corridor. Chin. J. Eco-Agric. 2016, 24, 1623–1632. [Google Scholar]
  55. Abbasi, M.K.; Tahir, M.M.; Sadiq, A.; Iqbal, M.; Zafar, M. Yield and nitrogen use efficiency of rainfed maize response to splitting and nitrogen rates in Kashmir, Pakistan. Agron. J. 2012, 104, 448–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Daily precipitation and air temperature dynamics during the lucerne growing seasons of 2021 and 2022.
Figure 1. Daily precipitation and air temperature dynamics during the lucerne growing seasons of 2021 and 2022.
Agriculture 15 00845 g001
Figure 2. Schematic diagram illustrating the layout of the experimental plots.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram illustrating the layout of the experimental plots.
Agriculture 15 00845 g002
Figure 3. Effect of different planting and nitrogen application patterns on lucerne plant height. FP (flat planting without mulching), PM (ridge-furrow with ordinary mulch), and BM (ridge-furrow with biodegradable mulch) represent three cultivation patterns; N0, N1, N2, and N3 correspond to nitrogen application rates of 0, 80, 160, and 240 kg ha−1, respectively. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05, Duncan’s test). P denotes the main effect of planting pattern, N represents the main effect of nitrogen level, and P × N indicates their interaction. Symbols *, **, and ns denote significance at p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and non-significance (p > 0.05), respectively.
Figure 3. Effect of different planting and nitrogen application patterns on lucerne plant height. FP (flat planting without mulching), PM (ridge-furrow with ordinary mulch), and BM (ridge-furrow with biodegradable mulch) represent three cultivation patterns; N0, N1, N2, and N3 correspond to nitrogen application rates of 0, 80, 160, and 240 kg ha−1, respectively. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05, Duncan’s test). P denotes the main effect of planting pattern, N represents the main effect of nitrogen level, and P × N indicates their interaction. Symbols *, **, and ns denote significance at p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and non-significance (p > 0.05), respectively.
Agriculture 15 00845 g003
Figure 4. Effects of different planting and nitrogen application patterns on lucerne stem diameter. FP (flat planting without mulching), PM (ridge-furrow with ordinary mulch), and BM (ridge-furrow with biodegradable mulch) represent three cultivation patterns; N0, N1, N2, and N3 correspond to nitrogen application rates of 0, 80, 160, and 240 kg ha−1, respectively. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05, Duncan’s test). P denotes the main effect of planting pattern, N represents the main effect of nitrogen level, and P × N indicates their interaction. Symbols ** and ns denote significance at p < 0.01 and non-significance (p > 0.05), respectively.
Figure 4. Effects of different planting and nitrogen application patterns on lucerne stem diameter. FP (flat planting without mulching), PM (ridge-furrow with ordinary mulch), and BM (ridge-furrow with biodegradable mulch) represent three cultivation patterns; N0, N1, N2, and N3 correspond to nitrogen application rates of 0, 80, 160, and 240 kg ha−1, respectively. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05, Duncan’s test). P denotes the main effect of planting pattern, N represents the main effect of nitrogen level, and P × N indicates their interaction. Symbols ** and ns denote significance at p < 0.01 and non-significance (p > 0.05), respectively.
Agriculture 15 00845 g004
Figure 5. Effects of different planting and nitrogen application patterns on lucerne quality. FP (flat planting without mulching), PM (ridge-furrow with ordinary mulch), and BM (ridge-furrow with biodegradable mulch) represent three cultivation patterns; N0, N1, N2, and N3 correspond to nitrogen application rates of 0, 80, 160, and 240 kg ha−1, respectively. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05, Duncan’s test). P denotes the main effect of planting pattern, N represents the main effect of nitrogen level, and P × N indicates their interaction. Symbols *, **, and ns denote significance at p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and non-significance (p > 0.05), respectively. Figure (a) shows crude protein content, figure (b) shows acid detergent fiber content, figure (c) shows neutral detergent fiber content and figure (d) shows relative feeding value.
Figure 5. Effects of different planting and nitrogen application patterns on lucerne quality. FP (flat planting without mulching), PM (ridge-furrow with ordinary mulch), and BM (ridge-furrow with biodegradable mulch) represent three cultivation patterns; N0, N1, N2, and N3 correspond to nitrogen application rates of 0, 80, 160, and 240 kg ha−1, respectively. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05, Duncan’s test). P denotes the main effect of planting pattern, N represents the main effect of nitrogen level, and P × N indicates their interaction. Symbols *, **, and ns denote significance at p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and non-significance (p > 0.05), respectively. Figure (a) shows crude protein content, figure (b) shows acid detergent fiber content, figure (c) shows neutral detergent fiber content and figure (d) shows relative feeding value.
Agriculture 15 00845 g005
Figure 6. Correlation analysis among indicators of lucerne production performance under different planting nitrogen application modes.
Figure 6. Correlation analysis among indicators of lucerne production performance under different planting nitrogen application modes.
Agriculture 15 00845 g006
Figure 7. Principal component factor load (a) and comprehensive scores of each treatment (b). In Figure 7b, FP (flat planting without mulching), PM (ridge-furrow with ordinary mulch), and BM (ridge-furrow with biodegradable mulch) represent three cultivation patterns; N0, N1, N2, and N3 correspond to nitrogen application rates of 0, 80, 160, and 240 kg ha−1, respectively; the numbers 1, 2, 3, etc., represent the ranking of comprehensive score for each treatment, respectively.
Figure 7. Principal component factor load (a) and comprehensive scores of each treatment (b). In Figure 7b, FP (flat planting without mulching), PM (ridge-furrow with ordinary mulch), and BM (ridge-furrow with biodegradable mulch) represent three cultivation patterns; N0, N1, N2, and N3 correspond to nitrogen application rates of 0, 80, 160, and 240 kg ha−1, respectively; the numbers 1, 2, 3, etc., represent the ranking of comprehensive score for each treatment, respectively.
Agriculture 15 00845 g007
Table 1. Experimental design.
Table 1. Experimental design.
TreatmentCultivation PatternNitrogen Level (kg·ha−1)
FPN0Traditional flat planting (FP)0 (N0)
FPN180 (N1)
FPN2160 (N2)
FPN3240 (N3)
BMN0Ridge-furrow planting with biodegradable film (BM)0 (N0)
BMN180 (N1)
BMN2160 (N2)
BMN3240 (N3)
PMN0Ridge-furrow planting with ordinary plastic film (PM)0 (N0)
PMN180 (N1)
PMN2160 (N2)
PMN3240 (N3)
Table 2. Effects of nitrogen application patterns on lucerne yield (kg ha−1).
Table 2. Effects of nitrogen application patterns on lucerne yield (kg ha−1).
Treatment20212022
Planting PatternNitrogen LevelFirst CutSecond CutTotal YieldFirst CutSecond CutThird CutTotal Yield
PMN04990 c2370 bc7370 c10,400 c5460 de2300 c18,100 c
N15490 b2480 ab7940 b11,400 a5900 b2350 bc19,700 b
N25930 a2540 a8500 a12,000 a6270 a2430 a20,700 a
N35710 ab2430 abc8140 b11,200 ab6170 a2380 ab19,700 b
BMN04430 f1940 e6370 gh9290 ef4800 g1940 f16,200 f
N14730 cde2250 d6980 de9520 cdef5420 de2090 de17,200 e
N24820 cd2350 cd7170 cd10,500 bc5640 c2150 d18,300 c
N34540 def2240 d6780 ef9880 cde5530 cd2100 de17,500 d
FPN04380 f1770 f6150 h8890 f4710 g1880 f15,500 g
N14460 ef1840 ef6300 gh9440 def5070 f1880 f16,400 f
N24640 def1950 e6590 fg10,200 cd5360 e2050 e17,600 d
N34670 def1920 e6590 fg9770 cde5150 f1920 f16,900 e
P**************
N**************
P × N*****ns***
FP (flat planting without mulching), PM (ridge-furrow with ordinary mulch), and BM (ridge-furrow with biodegradable mulch) represent three cultivation patterns; N0, N1, N2, and N3 correspond to nitrogen application rates of 0, 80, 160, and 240 kg ha−1, respectively. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05, Duncan’s test). P denotes the main effect of planting pattern, N represents the main effect of nitrogen level, and P × N indicates their interaction. Symbols *, **, and ns denote significance at p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and non-significance (p > 0.05), respectively.
Table 3. Lucerne water and nitrogen utilization in response to different cropping nitrogen application patterns.
Table 3. Lucerne water and nitrogen utilization in response to different cropping nitrogen application patterns.
Cultivation Pattern (P)Nitrogen Level (N)WUE (kg·ha–1·mm–1)IWUE (kg·ha–1·mm–1)PFPN (kg·kg–1)ANUE (kg·kg–1)
PMN02.73 ± 0.78 b3.51 ± 0.31 c
N12.99 ± 1.25 a3.81 ± 0.11 b172.69 ± 0.18 a4.54 ± 0.65 b
N23.05 ± 0.61 a4.02 ± 0.66 a91.10 ± 1.41 d5.44 ± 0.27 a
N32.95 ± 0.36 a3.84 ± 0.32 b58.00 ± 0.33 f1.96 ± 0.45 ef
BMN01.98 ± 0.32 de3.08 ± 0.66 e
N12.09 ± 1.19 d3.33 ± 1.3 d151.10 ± 6.43 b3.81 ± 0.50 bc
N22.24 ± 0.20 c3.50 ± 0.26 c79.51 ± 0.58 e4.04 ± 0.45 b
N31.96 ± 0.62 e3.34 ± 0.72 d50.61 ± 1.16 g1.58 ± 0.24 f
FPN01.39 ± 0.47 h2.98 ± 0.59 f
N11.60 ± 0.25 g3.12 ± 0.95 e141.83 ± 4.14 c2.65 ± 0.68 de
N21.80 ± 0.1 f3.32 ± 0.08 d75.73 ± 0.22 e3.25 ± 0.22 cd
N31.70 ± 0.2 fg3.24 ± 0.37 d49.03 ± 0.65 g1.50 ± 0.15 f
P********
N********
P × N**ns****
FP (flat planting without mulching), PM (ridge-furrow with ordinary mulch), and BM (ridge-furrow with biodegradable mulch) represent three cultivation patterns; N0, N1, N2, and N3 correspond to nitrogen application rates of 0, 80, 160, and 240 kg ha−1, respectively. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05, Duncan’s test). P denotes the main effect of planting pattern, N represents the main effect of nitrogen level, and P × N indicates their interaction. Symbols ** and ns denote significance at p < 0.01 and non-significance (p > 0.05), respectively.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yin, M.; Jiang, Y.; Ling, Y.; Ma, Y.; Qi, G.; Kang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Lu, Q.; Shang, Y.; Fan, X.; et al. Optimizing Lucerne Productivity and Resource Efficiency in China’s Yellow River Irrigated Region: Synergistic Effects of Ridge-Film Mulching and Controlled-Release Nitrogen Fertilization. Agriculture 2025, 15, 845. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15080845

AMA Style

Yin M, Jiang Y, Ling Y, Ma Y, Qi G, Kang Y, Wang Y, Lu Q, Shang Y, Fan X, et al. Optimizing Lucerne Productivity and Resource Efficiency in China’s Yellow River Irrigated Region: Synergistic Effects of Ridge-Film Mulching and Controlled-Release Nitrogen Fertilization. Agriculture. 2025; 15(8):845. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15080845

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yin, Minhua, Yuanbo Jiang, Yi Ling, Yanlin Ma, Guangping Qi, Yanxia Kang, Yayu Wang, Qiang Lu, Yujie Shang, Xiangrong Fan, and et al. 2025. "Optimizing Lucerne Productivity and Resource Efficiency in China’s Yellow River Irrigated Region: Synergistic Effects of Ridge-Film Mulching and Controlled-Release Nitrogen Fertilization" Agriculture 15, no. 8: 845. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15080845

APA Style

Yin, M., Jiang, Y., Ling, Y., Ma, Y., Qi, G., Kang, Y., Wang, Y., Lu, Q., Shang, Y., Fan, X., Han, G., Li, B., Zhu, J., Chen, J., & Li, H. (2025). Optimizing Lucerne Productivity and Resource Efficiency in China’s Yellow River Irrigated Region: Synergistic Effects of Ridge-Film Mulching and Controlled-Release Nitrogen Fertilization. Agriculture, 15(8), 845. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15080845

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop