Collaboration to Address the Challenges Faced by Smallholders in Practicing Organic Agriculture: A Case Study of the Organic Sorghum Industry in Zunyi City, China
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Research Framework
2.2. Methodology
2.3. Case Background
3. The EGF Model for the Organic Sorghum Industry in Zunyi
3.1. The Emergence and Popularity of the EGF Model for the Organic Sorghum Industry
3.1.1. The Emergence of the EGF Model for Organic Sorghum Production
3.1.2. The Popularization of the EGF Model for Organic Sorghum Production in Zunyi
3.2. The Structure of the EGF Model for the Organic Sorghum Industry
3.2.1. Enterprises
3.2.2. Government
3.2.3. Farmers
3.3. Operationalizing the EGF Model for the Organic Sorghum Industry
3.3.1. Collaboration in the Establishment of Organic Zones
3.3.2. Collaboration in Organic Sorghum Production
3.3.3. Collaboration in Other Aspects of the Organic Sorghum Industry
4. Results
4.1. Performance of the Implementation of the EGF Model for Organic Sorghum
4.1.1. Benefits to the Organic Sorghum Industry from the EGF Model
4.1.2. Benefits to Stakeholders from the EGF Model
- Smallholder farmers receive more income from the EGF model.
- 2.
- The adoption of the EGF model has enhanced the supply of raw materials to enterprises, thereby augmenting their profitability.
- 3.
- The EGF model fosters economic growth, leading to an increase in government tax revenue.
4.2. Solutions Derived from the EGF Model to the Challenges Faced by Smallholders in Organic Farming Practices
- Smallholder farmers are not required to cover any expenses for organic certification. Liquor companies cover the expenses of organic certification, raw material suppliers handle the application process, and the cooperative records information regarding organic sorghum production. Smallholder farmers are solely responsible for producing organic sorghum in accordance with organic standards. They can seek assistance from cooperative leaders, village cadres, and agricultural technical staff when encountering challenges.
- Smallholder farmers can achieve a stable and significant income through organic sorghum operations. Firstly, organic sorghum is cultivated under contract agreements, mitigating market risks for farmers and ensuring a steady income. Secondly, liquor companies cover the majority of production input costs, alleviating the financial burden of high inputs in organic agriculture for smallholder farmers. Thirdly, smallholder farmers are spared the need to transport organic sorghum over long distances post-harvest; instead, they deliver it to collection points in nearby towns or villages, minimizing transportation expenses. Fourthly, local governments manage the allocation of organic sorghum orders, prioritizing distribution to impoverished farmers, thereby enhancing the livelihoods of those with low incomes.
- Government support has boosted the organization of smallholder farmers and strengthened partnerships between enterprises and farmers. Firstly, government involvement has instilled confidence in smallholder farmers, who are willing to respond to the call of village committees and cooperative leaders. Secondly, government support has bolstered the organizational capabilities of village committees and cooperatives serving smallholder farmers. Under the support of local governments, village committees and cooperatives have standardized their operations and bolstered their capacity to mobilize farmers. Thirdly, government involvement fosters collaboration between smallholder farmers and enterprises. In rural Zunyi, farmers frequently harbor mistrust towards enterprises. However, the government enjoys considerable social credibility within the farming community. Its involvement alleviates smallholder farmers’ concerns and facilitates contract agreements between them and enterprises, leading to reduced transaction costs.
- Government involvement enhances farmers’ market position and mitigates the unequal trade smallholder farmers encounter when dealing with enterprises. Government support has bolstered farmers’ bargaining power. Simultaneously, government intervention has mediated the relationship between enterprises and smallholder farmers, resulting in contracts that benefit farmers. For instance, between 2007 and 2023, collaborative efforts between local governments and farmers resulted in a gradual increase in the purchase price of organic sorghum in Moutai. The price surged from RMB 4.2/kg (USD 0.58/kg) to RMB 11.2/kg (USD 1.55/kg), marking a remarkable increase of 166.7%. In comparison, the average price of corn rose from RMB 1.5/kg (USD 0.2/kg) to RMB 2.92/kg (USD 0.4/kg) during the same period, reflecting an increase of 94.5%. This significant hike substantially boosted farmers’ earnings. Additionally, government engagement minimizes enterprise defaults and forestalls occurrences like “malicious refusal” and “cheating farmers”.
- Smallholder farmers have access to technical training, financial assistance, insurance, and various other services. Regarding technical support, smallholder farmers benefit from a diverse array of services provided by the government, enterprises, cooperatives, and research institutes. Local governments and enterprises collaborate in delivering technical training to farmers, resulting in the development of numerous skilled farmers. Financially, most smallholder farmers forego the need for loans because enterprises cover many material input expenses. Additionally, larger households requiring loans can access them, as Zunyi city hosts numerous commercial banks offering sorghum credit programs tailored for large-scale households and enterprises. Regarding insurance, farmers benefit from policy-backed agricultural insurance, with the majority of the costs covered by the government and enterprises, leaving smallholder farmers responsible for only a nominal portion of the expenses.
- Smallholder farmers were provided with essential infrastructure and equipment for sorghum cultivation. Local governments have enhanced infrastructure, including roads and irrigation systems, and installed numerous insecticidal lamps within organic zones, with enterprises sharing some of the costs. Local governments offer subsidies to cooperatives for purchasing agricultural machinery, which the cooperatives can utilize to offer services to smallholder farmers.
4.3. Shortcomings in the Results of the EGF Model’s Implementation
5. Discussion
5.1. Similarities and Differences between the EGF Model and Other Practices
5.2. Potential Application of the EGF Model
6. Conclusions and Limitations
6.1. Conclusions
6.2. Limitations
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Suryatapa, D. Impact of Organic Farming on Human and Environmental Health. In Organic Farming: Global Perspectives and Methods, 2nd ed.; Chandran, S., Unni, M.R., Thomas, S., Meena, D.K., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2023; pp. 255–289. [Google Scholar]
- Novikova, A.; Zemaitiene, R.; Marks-Bielska, R.; Bielski, S. Assessment of the Environmental Public Goods of the Organic Farming System: A Lithuanian Case Study. Agriculture 2024, 14, 362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dabbert, S.; Haring, A.M.; Zanoli, R. Organic Farming: Policies and Prospects; Zed Books: London, UK, 2004; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Barański, M.; Srednicka-Tober, D.; Volakakis, N.; Seal, C.; Sanderson, R.; Stewart, G.B.; Benbrook, C.; Biavati, B.; Markellou, E.; Giotis, C.; et al. Higher Antioxidant and Lower Cadmium Concentrations and Lower Incidence of Pesticide Residues in Organically Grown Crops: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analyses. Br. J. Nutr. 2014, 112, 794–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tully, K.L.; McAskill, C.P. Promoting Soil Health in Organically Managed Systems: A Review. Org. Agric. 2019, 10, 339–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meemken, E.; Qaim, M. Organic Agriculture, Food Security, and the Environment. Annual Review of Resource Economics. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 2018, 10, 39–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crystal-Ornelas, R.; Thapa, R.; Tully, K.L. Soil Organic Carbon is Affected by Organic Amendments, Conservation Tillage, and Cover Cropping in Organic Farming Systems: A Meta-analysis. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2021, 312, 107356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ostandie, N.; Giffard, B.; Bonnard, O.; Joubard, B.; Richart-Cervera, S.; Thiéry, D.; Rusch, A. Multi-community Effects of Organic and Conventional Farming Practices in Vineyards. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 11979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reganold, J.; Wachter, J. Organic Agriculture in the Twenty-first Century. Nat. Plants 2016, 2, 15221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Altenbuchner, C.; Vogel, S.; Larcher, M. Social, Economic and Environmental Impacts of Organic Cotton Production on the Livelihood of Smallholder Farmers in Odisha, India. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 2017, 33, 373–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gamage, A.; Gangahagedara, R.; Gamage, J.; Jayasinghe, N.; Kodikara, N.; Suraweera, P.; Merah, O. Role of Organic Farming for Achieving Sustainability in Agriculture. Farm. Syst. 2023, 1, 100005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Squalli, J.; Adamkiewicz, G. Organic Farming and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A Longitudinal U.S. State-level Study. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 192, 30–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Willer, H.; Schlatter, B.; Trávníček, J. (Eds.) The World of Organic Agriculture: Statistics and Emerging Trends 2024; Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FiBL, Frick, and IFOAM–Organics International: Bonn, Germany, 2024; Available online: https://www.fibl.org/fileadmin/documents/shop/1747-organic-world-2024_light.pdf (accessed on 14 March 2024).
- Sternfeld, E. China’s Organic Agriculture and Food Sector; Sino-German Agricultural Centre (DCZ). Available online: https://www.dcz-china.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/2023-03_Study_Organic-farming-in-China_updated.pdf (accessed on 10 April 2024).
- International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD); United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Smallholders, Food Security, and the Environment; International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD): Rome, Italy, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Lowder, S.K.; Sánchez, M.V.; Bertini, R. Which Farms Feed the World and Has Farmland Become More Concentrated? World Dev. 2021, 142, 105455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Halberg, N.; Müller, A.W. (Eds.) Organic Agriculture for Sustainable Livelihoods; Routledge: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Konjengbam, M.D.; Singh, D.K.; Yadav, R.N.; Singh, D.K.; Singh, L.B.; Kumar, M.; Sachan, D.K.; Pandey, M.K. Impact of Organic Farming on the Livelihood of Organic Farmers in Manipur. Asian J. Agric. Ext. Econ. Sociol. 2023, 41, 350–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hauser, M.; Aigelsperger, L.; Owamani, A.; Delve, R.J. Learning Achievements of Farmers during the Transition to Market-oriented Organic Agriculture in Rural Uganda. J. Agric. Rural Dev. Trop. Subtrop. 2010, 111, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
- Soltani, S.; Azadi, H.; Mahmoudi, H.; Witlox, F. Organic Agriculture in Iran: Farmers’ Barriers to and Factors Influencing Adoption. Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 2014, 29, 126–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghanghas, B.S.; Rohila, A.K.; Chahal, P.K.; Mukteshwar, R. Prospects and Constraints Experienced in Organic Farming by Farmers. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 2021, 91, 1515–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jouzi, Z.; Azadi, H.; Taheri, F.; Zarafshani, K.; Gebrehiwot, K.; Passel, S.V.; Lebailly, P. Organic Farming and Small-Scale Farmers: Main Opportunities and Challenges. Ecol. Econ. 2017, 132, 144–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gómez, M.I.; Barrett, C.B.; Buck, L.E.; De Groote, H.; Ferris, S.; Gao, H.O.; McCullough, E.; Miller, D.D.; Outhred, H.; Pell, A.N.; et al. Agriculture. Research Principles for Developing Country Food Value Chains. Science 2011, 332, 1154–1155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pandey, B.; Singh, A.K.; Singh, N.; Rajan, N.; Kumar, A.; Singh, R.K.; Keshava. Organic Farming: Assessment of the Perception of Practicing Tribal Farmers in Jharkhand. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 2022, 92, 711–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aulakh, C.; Sidhu, A.; Randhawa, S.; Singh, D. Organic and Natural Farming in North-West India: Farmers’ perspective. Agric. Res. J. 2022, 59, 1078–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dutta, P.; Saikia, B. The Current Landscape of Organic Farming in Assam and Challenges Confronting Organic Farmers in the Region. In Advances in Agriculture Sciences Volume II; Singh, G., Singh, P., Pandey, A.K., Rokade, S., Eds.; Bhumi Publishing: Maharashtra, India, 2024; pp. 153–159. [Google Scholar]
- Nandi, R.; Bokelmanna, W.; Nithya, V.G.; Dias, G. Smallholder Organic Farmer’s Attitudes, Objectives and Barriers towards Production of Organic Fruits and Vegetables in India: A Multivariate Analysis. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2015, 27, 396–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tumbure, A.; Dera, J.; Kunjeku, T.C.; Nyamangara, J. Contextualising Smallholder Organic Agriculture in Zimbabwe and Other Sub-Saharan African Countries: A Review of Challenges and Opportunities. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B Soil Plant Sci. 2022, 72, 1020–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mukaila, R.; Falola, A.; Otekunrin, O.A. Measuring the Economic Performance of Smallholder Organic maize farms; Implications for food safety and security. Future Food J. Food Agric. Soc. 2023, 11, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Heena, M.; Malik, D.P.; Pant, P. Constraints Faced by Farmers Practicing Organic Farming in Haryana. Pollut. Res. 2022, 41, 158–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barrett, C. Smallholder Market Participation: Concepts and Evidence From Eastern and Southern Africa. Food Policy 2008, 33, 299–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oelofse, M.; Høgh-Jensen, H.; Abreu, L.S.; Almeida, G.F.; Hui, Q.Y.; Sultan, T.; Neergaard, A. Certified Organic Agriculture in China and Brazil: Market Accessibility and Outcomes Following Adoption. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69, 1785–1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boateng, V.F.; Donkoh, S.A.; Cobbinah, M.T. Drivers of Smallholder Farmers’ Organic Farming Adoption and the Organic Share of the Total Cropland in Northern Ghana. All Life 2023, 16, 2224526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.; Hu, L. Can China’s Farmers’ Specialised Cooperatives Still Achieve the “Union of the Weak”: A Comparative Analysis Based on Chinese and Japanese Practices? Chin. Rural Econ. 2016, 32, 30–38. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, S.; Tu, W.; Liu, Z.; Xiang, R.; Kuang, R. Current Situation of Organic Agriculture in Yunnan Province: Problems and Countermeasures. J. Anhui Agric. Sci. 2007, 18, 5573–5575. [Google Scholar]
- Blanc, J.; Kledal, P.R. The Brazilian Organic Food Sector: Prospects and Constraints of Facilitating the Inclusion of Smallholders. J. Rural Stud. 2012, 28, 142–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cai, Y. Research on the Dilemmas, Causes and Paths Faced by Organic Small-Scale Farmers under the Background of Organic Agriculture Capitalization: A Case Study of JM Farm in Fuzhou. Master’s Thesis, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Raynolds, L.T. The Globalisation of Organic Agro-food Networks. World Dev. 2004, 32, 725–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thamaga-Chitja, J.M.; Hendriks, S.L. Emerging Issues in Smallholder Organic Production and Marketing in South Africa. Dev. S. Afr. 2008, 25, 317–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kelly, C.; Metelerkamp, L. Smallholder Farmers and Organic Agriculture in South Africa. Available online: https://www.sustainabilityinstitute.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/5302_si.pdf (accessed on 22 December 2023).
- Yu, H.; Hu, L.; Lin, X. What Kind of Intermediator is Needed for the Frganic Connection between Small-scale Farmers and Modern Agriculture. Economist 2022, 34, 108–118. [Google Scholar]
- More Than 98% of China’s Agricultural Operating Entities Are Still Small Farmers. Available online: https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-03/01/content_5369755.htm (accessed on 25 December 2023).
- Geng, L.; Yan, S.; Lu, Q.; Liang, X.; Li, Y.; Xue, Y.A. Rural Land Share Cooperative System for Alleviating the Small, Scattered, and Weak Dilemma in Agricultural Development: The Cases of Tangyue, Zhouchong, and Chongzhou. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, C.; Zhou, X.; Wang, C.; Guo, Y.; Diao, Y.; Shen, S.; Reis, S.; Li, W.; Xu, J.; Gu, B. Ageing Threatens Sustainability of Smallholder Farming in China. Nature 2023, 616, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- China’s National Certification and Accreditation Administration (CNCAA); China Agricultural University (CAU). Chinese Organic Product Certification and Organic Industry Development (2023); China Agricultual Science and Technology Press: Beijing, China, 2024; pp. 18–21. [Google Scholar]
- The People’s Government of Guizhou Province. Guizhou Provincial Government Work Report 2021. Available online: https://www.guizhou.gov.cn/home/tt/202109/t20210913_70070896.html (accessed on 15 March 2024).
- Zhu, L.; Yang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Xue, Y. Using Marginal Land Resources to Solve the Shortage of Rural Entrepreneurial Land in China. Land 2022, 11, 1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Yang, C.; Yan, S.; Wang, W.; Xue, Y. Alleviating Relative Poverty in Rural China through a Diffusion Schema of Returning Farmer Entrepreneurship. Sustainability 2023, 15, 1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, X.; Zhou, S.; Huang, Y. Development Strategies of Liquor-culture-oriented Tourism in Renhuai. Liquor-Mak. Sci. Technol. 2016, 4, 106–110. [Google Scholar]
- Du, J. The Evolution and Mechanism of Chinese Farmers’ Cooperatives. Seeker 2019, 40, 151–156. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, L. How to Bring the Collective Back in? The Logic of the Development of Collective Economy by Village Collective-based Cooperatives. Chin. Rural Econ. 2022, 38, 90–105. [Google Scholar]
- Li, W. Research Trends in Jiang-flavor Baijiu Fermentation: From Fermentation Microecology to Environmental Ecology. J. Food Sci. 2022, 87, 1362–1374. [Google Scholar]
- Ke, F.; Zhang, K.; Li, Z.; Wang, J.; Zhang, F.; Wu, H.; Zhang, Z.; Lu, F.; Wang, Y.; Duan, Y.; et al. Transcriptomic Analysis of Starch Accumulation Patterns in Different Glutinous Sorghum Seeds. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 11133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Achieving 30% of the Industry’s Sales Revenue with 4.3% of Production! 2022 Guizhou Province Liquor Industry Development Report Released. Available online: https://www.gzstv.com/a/6c2c4207a02d4db09bce5730b5f0014d (accessed on 25 April 2024).
- Zhang, F.; Qiao, Y.; Wang, F.; Zhang, W. A Perspective on Organic Agriculture in China—Opportunities and Challenges. Available online: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/10925406.pdf (accessed on 15 March 2024).
- Zhang, X.; Chen, Y.; Liu, C. Current Situation and Outlook for the Development of Organic Agriculture in China. Agric. Outlook 2009, 5, 19–22+27. [Google Scholar]
- Qian, J. The Economic Analysis on the Production, Consumption of Organic Agricultural Products in China Illustrated by the Case of Organic Vegetable. Doctoral Dissertation, Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, X.; Wang, C. On the Changes in the Mechanism of Benefit Linkage between Enterprises and Farmer. Theor. Investig. 2010, 26, 83–86. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, J.; Li, L.; Li, Q. Close Interest Linkage of “Three Industries” Integration in Rural Areas: The Main Modes and Mechanism Construction. J. Anhui Agric. Univ. 2023, 32, 48–52+67. [Google Scholar]
- Xiao, C.; Yang, Z. Analysis of the Patterns and Problems of the Linkage of Interests Between Agricultural Leading Enterprises and Farm Households. Agric. Econ. 2023, 43, 18–21. [Google Scholar]
- Xiong, S.; Li, J. Benefit Linkage Mechanisms for Farmers’ Professional Cooperatives: Literature Review and Research Perspectives. China Collect. Econ. 2023, 40, 98–101. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Luo, A. Study on the Interest Connection Model between Agricultural Enterprises and Farmers: A Case Study of Key Leading Enterprises in Beijing. Rural Econ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 34, 250–253. [Google Scholar]
- Qiao, Y.; Martin, F.; He, X.; Zhen, H.; Pan, X. The Changing Role of Local Government in Organic Agriculture Development in Wanzai County. China. Can. J. Dev. Stud. 2018, 40, 64–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Qiao, Y.H.; He, X.Q.; Pan, X.H. Study on the Management System and Operation Mechanism of Organic Agriculture Demonstration Park: A Case Study in Wanzai County, Jiangxi Province. J. China Agric. Resour. Reg. Plann. 2017, 38, 174–180. [Google Scholar]
- Bai, L.; Zhao, B. Study on the Selection of Industrialised Poverty Alleviation Models and Benefit Linkage Mechanisms: Taking the Development of Edible Mushroom Industry in Yixian County, Hebei Province as an Example. Hebei Acad. 2015, 35, 158–162. [Google Scholar]
- Gong, L. Research on the Construction and Innovative Models of Market-based Poverty Reduction Mechanisms under Government Leadership: Based on the Perspective of Precision Poverty Reduction. China Soft Sci. 2016, 31, 154–162. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Y. Industrial Poverty Alleviation in the Dual Context of Precision Poverty Alleviation and Agricultural Industrialisation: Practices and Dilemmas. J. Yunnan Adm. Coll. 2019, 21, 6–10. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, T.; Wei, G. The Achievement of the Organic Connection among Government, Market and Farmers: A New Mechanism of Industrial Poverty Alleviation and Rural Vitalization. Acad. Res. 2021, 64, 49–55+177. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, C. Study on Rural Development and Poverty Alleviation from the Perspective of Social Governance. J. Fujian Acad. Gov. 2015, 38, 5–13. [Google Scholar]
- Wen, H.T. Survey and Research on the Government’s Promotion of Organic Agriculture in Xichong County, Sichuan Province. Master’s Thesis, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Tan, T. Dualistic Agricultural Patterns, Ecological Financialisation and Rural Revitalisation in Mountainous Ethnic Areas: From Types and Social Hierarchies of Organic Agriculture. J. Northwest Ethn. Stud. 2022, 37, 115–126. [Google Scholar]
County | Production Area (ha) | Yield (tons) |
---|---|---|
Renhuai | 17,758.52 | 66,785.52 |
Suiyang | 10,371.50 | 58,243.50 |
Tongzi | 9994.73 | 35,330.60 |
Xishui | 8713.05 | 32,575.00 |
Daozhen | 8383.93 | 37,728.90 |
Wuchuan | 6299.98 | 28,350.00 |
Bozhou | 5994.08 | 21,703.50 |
Huichuan | 2415.16 | 9057.25 |
Fenggang | 2355.73 | 12,847.17 |
Zhengan | 1543.41 | 5787.97 |
Meitan | 698.51 | 2619.50 |
Honghuagang | 111.32 | 417.50 |
Total | 74,639.91 | 311,446.41 |
Year | Number of Households Involved | Total Cultivation Area (ha) | Average Area per Household (ha) | Median Area (ha) | Minimum Area (ha) | Largest Area (ha) | Average Yield (kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2016 | 34,023 | 12,177.63 | 0.36 | 0.33 | 0.02 | 3.67 | 3420 |
2018 | 41,836 | 18,145.90 | 0.43 | 0.33 | 0.02 | 138.67 | 3420 |
2020 | 49,766 | 16,875.80 | 0.34 | 0.27 | 0.07 | 113.33 | 3450 |
2022 | 39,599 | 13,467.27 | 0.34 | 0.27 | 0.03 | 266.67 | 3480 |
2023 | 50,442 | 18,348.40 | 0.36 | 0.27 | 0.03 | 111.43 | 3495 |
2024 | 51,102 | 17,741.80 | 0.35 | 0.27 | 0.07 | 99.27 | — |
Category | Items | Unit | Corn | Organic Sorghum |
---|---|---|---|---|
Material inputs | Seeds | RMB/ha | 525 | 405 (borne by enterprise) |
Fertilizer | RMB/ha | 3450 | 3300 (enterprise 1650, farmer 1650) | |
Agrochemical/botanical insecticides | RMB/ha | 450 | 450 (borne by enterprise) | |
Material cost | RMB/ha | 4425 | 4155 (enterprise 2505, farmer 1650) | |
Labor inputs | Labor required (self-employed) | days/ha | 105 | 165 |
Labor price | RMB/day | 130 | 130 | |
Labor cost | RMB/ha | 13,650 | 21,450 | |
Output | Average yield | kg/ha | 5250 | 3450 |
Product price | RMB/kg | 2.5~3.1 | 7.6~11.2 | |
Output value | RMB/ha | 13,125~16,275 | 26,220~38,640 | |
Revenue and profit | Income of farmers (deducted cost of Material inputs) | RMB/ha | 8700~11,850 | 24,570~36,990 |
Profits for farmers (deduction cost of Material and labor costs) | RMB/ha | −4950~−1800 | 3120~15,540 |
Prevalent Challenges Faced by Smallholders | Specific Description of the Challenges | Solution to EGF Model in Zunyi | Outcomes of Solving the Challenges |
---|---|---|---|
Difficulty in obtaining certification | Deficiency in knowledge, the substantial expenses associated with certification, and the intricate nature of procedures. | Liquor companies bear the cost of certification fees, while raw material suppliers handle the certification application process. | Smallholders are not required to initiate the organic certification process or cover its expenses. |
Income instability | Inadequate or fluctuating price premiums, absence of a stable and dependable market, and elevated input and transportation costs. | Organic contracts stipulate a minimum purchase price for organic sorghum. Liquor companies assume the majority of material input costs. Raw material suppliers establish collection points in nearby townships or villages for farmers’ convenience. | Smallholders enjoy stable incomes and incur minimal expenses for inputs and transportation. |
Low degree of organization of farmers | Inadequate self-organization among farmers, weak organizational capacity of villages, and elevated transaction costs between enterprises and smallholders. | Local governments have undertaken significant efforts to address this issue, such as organizing and mobilizing smallholders, offering guidance and support to village councils and cooperatives, and facilitating coordination between enterprises and smallholders. | The level of organization among farmers has been improved; village committees and cooperatives have become more proactive in supporting farmers; collaboration between enterprises and smallholders has become more seamless, leading to reduced transaction costs. |
Unfair market trading | Smallholders have limited bargaining power, resulting in lower crop prices and stricter transaction regulations that disadvantage them. | Local governments engaged in negotiations with enterprises to secure contractual terms advantageous to smallholders. | Smallholders obtained improved contractual terms, including higher prices for their products. |
Lack of agricultural socialized services | Insufficient education and training, limited technology access, absence of insurance, and inadequate finances. | Local governments and enterprises offer technical assistance and training to smallholders, while also sharing the insurance premiums for their crops. | Smallholders have received training and technical services. They were provided with policy insurance. Additionally, many of them do not require loans, thanks to support from both the government and enterprises. |
Shortage of infrastructure and tools | Insufficient road infrastructure and scarcity of irrigation systems, agricultural machinery, etc. | Local governments provide infrastructure for organic zones, with enterprises sharing some of the costs. Additionally, local governments subsidize agricultural machinery. | Smallholders are not required to invest in infrastructure; instead, they can utilize many mechanical services offered by cooperatives, most of which are provided free of charge. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wu, S.; Li, S. Collaboration to Address the Challenges Faced by Smallholders in Practicing Organic Agriculture: A Case Study of the Organic Sorghum Industry in Zunyi City, China. Agriculture 2024, 14, 726. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14050726
Wu S, Li S. Collaboration to Address the Challenges Faced by Smallholders in Practicing Organic Agriculture: A Case Study of the Organic Sorghum Industry in Zunyi City, China. Agriculture. 2024; 14(5):726. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14050726
Chicago/Turabian StyleWu, Sheng, and Shanwei Li. 2024. "Collaboration to Address the Challenges Faced by Smallholders in Practicing Organic Agriculture: A Case Study of the Organic Sorghum Industry in Zunyi City, China" Agriculture 14, no. 5: 726. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14050726
APA StyleWu, S., & Li, S. (2024). Collaboration to Address the Challenges Faced by Smallholders in Practicing Organic Agriculture: A Case Study of the Organic Sorghum Industry in Zunyi City, China. Agriculture, 14(5), 726. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14050726