Next Article in Journal
Vigor Detection for Naturally Aged Soybean Seeds Based on Polarized Hyperspectral Imaging Combined with Ensemble Learning Algorithm
Next Article in Special Issue
Detection and Classification of Citrus Fruit Infestation by Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) Using a Multi-Path Vis/NIR Spectroscopy System
Previous Article in Journal
Estimating Livelihood Vulnerability and Its Impact on Adaptation Strategies in the Context of Disaster Avoidance Resettlement in Southern Shaanxi, China
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Agriculture
Volume 13
Issue 8
10.3390/agriculture13081498
Review Report
agriculture-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Parameters Optimization and Performance Evaluation Model of Air-Assisted Electrostatic Sprayer for Citrus Orchards

Agriculture 2023, 13(8), 1498; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13081498
by Xiuyun Xue 1,2,3,4, Kaixiang Zeng 1, Nengchao Li 1, Qin Luo 1, Yihang Ji 1, Zhen Li 1,2,3,4,*, Shilei Lyu 1,2,3,4 and Shuran Song 1,2
Reviewer 1:
Zhou Yang
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Agriculture 2023, 13(8), 1498; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13081498
Submission received: 9 July 2023 / Revised: 24 July 2023 / Accepted: 25 July 2023 / Published: 27 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Agricultural Machinery and Technology for Fruit Tree Management)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please see the review .

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Minor editing of English language required

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

Thank you very much for your opinions and suggestions. These comments are very helpful for revising and improving the quality of the manuscript. We have studied the opinions carefully and revised our manuscript, and further edited for English language. We response the reviewer’s comments with a point
by point and highlight the changes in the file. Please see the file for more details.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The terminology has been abbreviated with letters, and in subsequent articles, only the letters need to be abbreviated. For example CMR, P1, P2, P3 etc.

In section 3.1 of the article, using range comparison and mean comparison to analyze the significance of the influence factors is a conventional method and not necessary to be explained. Additionally, this content belongs to the method section.

 

The author's statement is incorrect in line 248 of the article. The larger the CV, the more uneven the deposition.

 

In section 2.4 of the article, the author should explain the calculation method of evaluation index and the calculation method of OWM evaluation weight.

 

There is a question about Table 7, why are the flow rates of AAES and ES the same, but the values of water consumption I1 different?

 

 

About the quality of presentation, the English expressions needs to be improved, suggest finding a native English speaker to polish the article, so that it would be understood  easier.

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

Thank you very much for your opinions and suggestions. These comments are very helpful for revising and improving the quality of the manuscript. We have studied the opinions carefully and revised our manuscript, and further edited for English language. We response the reviewer’s comments with a point
by point and highlight the changes in the file. Please see the file for more details.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop