Next Article in Journal
Can Milk Flow Traits Act as Biomarkers of Lameness in Dairy Cows?
Next Article in Special Issue
Value of Wholegrain Rice in a Healthy Human Nutrition
Previous Article in Journal
A Review of Representative Methods Used in Wine Authentication
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Combining Ability and Gene Action for Yield Characteristics in Novel Aromatic Cytoplasmic Male Sterile Hybrid Rice under Water-Stress Conditions

Agriculture 2021, 11(3), 226; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11030226
by Hamdi F. El-Mowafi 1, Muneera D. F. AlKahtani 2,*, Rizk M. Abdallah 1, Amr M. Reda 1, Kotb A. Attia 1,3,*, Mahmoud A. El-Hity 4, Hend E. El-Dabaawy 1, Latifa Al Husnain 2, Talal K. Al-Ateeq 3 and Mohamed A. EL-Esawi 5
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Agriculture 2021, 11(3), 226; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11030226
Submission received: 1 February 2021 / Revised: 26 February 2021 / Accepted: 4 March 2021 / Published: 9 March 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This study evaluated the combining ability of 5 aromatic  and 4 restorer lines using Line x Tester analyses for10  yield component characters under irrigated and water deficit growth conditions. The data set describes the outcomes of several crosses and is useful for the rice breeding community. There is no discussion about the drought tolerance, as far as I am concerned the authors show that there is heterosis and that some offspring shows a greater vigor and yield. Since the drought is not described, it is impossible to judge if there was drought avoidance, drought tolerance and if the offspring performed better under realistic filed conditions. What was the exact stress applied?? So far nothing was described.  The correlation analysis is logical but does not add any new insights. The material and methods are really concise and do not allow to repeat the experiment!


Detailed remarks:

p3:

-What were the exact variables used to cluster the lines?

p4

-Indicate ANOVA and post hoc combination in the tables

-The authors report that all variables were significant. How to judge objectively what traits were "highly affected"?

-How to define a "good performance" what was the reference to compare to?

-Figure 2:what does * means?

Author Response

Please see the attachment 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments:

The writen English must be significiantly improved.

The ideea of some sentences is not clearly presented.

Some sentences are too long and they must by split in other two or three. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

The manuscript entitled: “Combining Ability and Gene Action for Yield Characters in Novel Aromatic Cytoplasmic Male Sterile Hybrid Rice under Water Stress Conditions” concerned topical scientific filed of adoption of rice cultivars to semi-arid areas. The studies on heterosis for hybrid rice generation is very promising for sustainable agriculture. Therefore, the authors' attempts to describe new varieties for agriculture are valuable and interesting. However, few questions arise:

 Materials and methods

More information about water stress regimes should be written

If any measurement of water status in soil or plants hydration status during stress was noted ?

In therm of ANOVA analysis if you have two factor: (1) water status (2) type of parental lines aromatic and non aromatic. Two way ANOVA will give much more information about the interaction of water regimes with different parental lines

Results

Results are written very clear and sufficient discussion was conducted, however, result presentation could be more clear and informative as for table 1. Differences in  yield traits will be more transparent if presented as bar graph or even better, box plots presenting fold change between  normal and stress conditions, moreover, figure for most promising genotype can be chosen in main text and results for other genotypes can be presented in supplementary table

The same is for other tables

Figure 2, 3, 4.  please described the legend

Figure 3 and 4, my suggestion is to combine both plot in one presenting differences between different water regimes

In 3.1. result sentence: Parental lines…combination showed good performance… should be : better performance

For 3.2 ANOVA results sentence that sth is highly significant is imprecise and misleading, should be just significant

Author Response

Please see the attachment 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop