Next Article in Journal
Severe Acute Kidney Injury in Cardiovascular Surgery: Thrombotic Microangiopathy as a Differential Diagnosis to Ischemia Reperfusion Injury. A Retrospective Study
Previous Article in Journal
Preoperative Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Prognostic Factor in Uterine Sarcoma
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mother-to-Infant Bonding in Women with Postpartum Psychosis and Severe Postpartum Depression: A Clinical Cohort Study
Article

Machine Learning-Based Predictive Modeling of Postpartum Depression

by 1,†, 2,†, 3,† and 3,*
1
Department of Food and Nutrition, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea
2
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea University Medical Center, Seoul 02841, Korea
3
Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to the work.
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(9), 2899; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092899
Received: 22 August 2020 / Revised: 6 September 2020 / Accepted: 7 September 2020 / Published: 8 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pregnancy and Bipolar Disorder)
Postpartum depression is a serious health issue beyond the mental health problems that affect mothers after childbirth. There are no predictive tools available to screen postpartum depression that also allow early interventions. We aimed to develop predictive models for postpartum depression using machine learning (ML) approaches. We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System 2012–2013 with 28,755 records (3339 postpartum depression and 25,416 normal cases). The imbalance between the two groups was addressed by a balanced resampling using both random down-sampling and the synthetic minority over-sampling technique. Nine different ML algorithms, including random forest (RF), stochastic gradient boosting, support vector machines (SVM), recursive partitioning and regression trees, naïve Bayes, k-nearest neighbor (kNN), logistic regression, and neural network, were employed with 10-fold cross-validation to evaluate the models. The overall classification accuracies of the nine models ranged from 0.650 (kNN) to 0.791 (RF). The RF method achieved the highest area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC) value of 0.884, followed by SVM, which achieved the second-best performance with an AUC value of 0.864. Predictive modeling developed using ML-approaches may thus be used as a prediction (screening) tool for postpartum depression in future studies. View Full-Text
Keywords: postpartum depression; machine learning; predictive modeling; Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) postpartum depression; machine learning; predictive modeling; Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS)
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Shin, D.; Lee, K.J.; Adeluwa, T.; Hur, J. Machine Learning-Based Predictive Modeling of Postpartum Depression. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 2899. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092899

AMA Style

Shin D, Lee KJ, Adeluwa T, Hur J. Machine Learning-Based Predictive Modeling of Postpartum Depression. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9(9):2899. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092899

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shin, Dayeon, Kyung J. Lee, Temidayo Adeluwa, and Junguk Hur. 2020. "Machine Learning-Based Predictive Modeling of Postpartum Depression" Journal of Clinical Medicine 9, no. 9: 2899. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092899

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop