Next Article in Journal
Knowledge on Signs and Risk Factors in Stroke Patients
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of Diabetes on Prognosis Following Myocardial Infarction Treated with Primary Angioplasty and Potent Antiplatelet Therapy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Liquid Biopsy: A Biomarker-Driven Tool towards Precision Oncology

1
Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA 17033-0850, USA
2
Next-Generation Therapies Program, Penn State Cancer Institute, Hershey, PA 17033-0850, USA
3
The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033-0850, USA
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(8), 2556; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082556
Submission received: 3 August 2020 / Accepted: 4 August 2020 / Published: 7 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Oncology)

1. Liquid Biopsy towards Precision Oncology

Liquid biopsy or the sampling of bodily fluids, mostly blood, has been intensely investigated and developed for clinical utility in medicine, especially oncology [1]. Analysis of the cellular and/or molecular contents of the blood-based biopsy has been demonstrated to yield predictive biomarkers that help decisions on anti-cancer targeted therapy and monitor tumor response to treatment. Emerging evidence indicates the potential of plasma-derived molecules for early detection and diagnosis of various malignant diseases. Besides, research efforts have been focused on the methodologies in an attempt to improve the efficiency of isolation and analysis of biomarkers collected from blood-based biopsies. The ultimate goal is to develop an accurate, rapid, and cost-effective technology of liquid biopsy that can be used for a point of care in the clinical practice of precision oncology.
In this article [2], Mathai and others reported a comprehensive review of liquid biopsy as well as their application for diagnosis and prognostication in some of the most common solid tumors. Various aspects of liquid biopsy, including its advantages and disadvantages, are compared with the conventional surgical biopsies. The three major types of biomarkers being isolated and analyzed in liquid biopsy, including circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), circulating tumor cells (CTCs), and exosomes, are discussed. The methodologies for isolation and analysis of liquid biopsy are presented. These include commercially available kits for the isolation of cell free DNA (cfDNA), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved instrument CELLSEARCH® for capturing and enumerating CTCs, and conventional methods for the isolation of exosomes using Western blotting and enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Analysis of the genetic contents in the liquid biopsied biomarkers by advanced techniques of polymerase chain reactions (PCR) and next-generation technology is described. The clinical utility of liquid biopsy in colorectal, breast, hepatocellular, gastric, and lung carcinomas is discussed. By enabling the detection of genetic alterations in the tumors, liquid biopsy-based biomarkers may be utilized for predicting tumor response to treatment, monitoring anti-tumor response during therapy, and determining prognosis.

2. Liquid Biopsy in Pancreatic Cancer

While pancreatic cancer (PC) is relatively uncommon, its mortality rate has remained the highest among all malignant diseases [3]. PC is frequently diagnosed at an advanced stage, such that palliative chemotherapy with supportive care is the only treatment option [4]. Early detection and diagnosis of PC is of the utmost importance for multi-disciplinary treatment with curative intent [5]. Conventional imaging modalities with tissue biopsy are able to diagnose symptomatic PC [5,6,7], though relatively late in the disease course, except when they are performed for seemingly unrelated causes and a pancreatic mass is incidentally identified. In recent years, liquid, particularly blood-based biopsy, has emerged and offered a new opportunity for the early detection and diagnosis of PC.
As demonstrated in a number of studies, CTCs, ctDNA, and extracellular vesicles (including exosomes and microvesicles) have been detected in patients with PC [8,9,10]. Analysis of plasma-derived ctDNA as well as the molecular cargoes of CTCs and EVs has yielded a variety of cancer-related biomarkers [8,9,10]. Preliminary studies have demonstrated the potential of a combination of these blood-based biomarkers for early detection of PC [11,12,13,14]. A prospective study shows the correlation of exosomal DNA and ctDNA in blood-based biopsies with clinical outcomes and suggests the utility of these nucleic acids for therapeutic stratification [15]. A meta-analysis indicates a relatively high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of liquid biopsy, which can serve as a surrogate for tissue in the molecular profiling of PC [16]. With the hope of developing liquid biopsy for clinical utility, various technological approaches have been focused on optimizing the isolation of blood-based biomarkers from patients with PC.

3. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

Accumulating evidence indicates the clinical utility of liquid biopsy for potential biomarkers in patients with malignant diseases (Figure 1). The combined features of liquid biopsy including minimal invasiveness, repeatability, and relatively low cost have enabled it to emerge as a biomarker-driven tool complementary to biopsy of tumor tissues. Continued research efforts to improve the accuracy, efficiency, and cost effectiveness of liquid biopsy as well as to validate its clinical utility in prospective studies with a large number of patients from various geographical locations are indicated to attain the goal of precision oncology.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Crowley, E.; Di Nicolantonio, F.; Loupakis, F.; Bardelli, A. Liquid biopsy: Monitoring cancer-genetics in the blood. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 10, 472–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mathai, R.A.; Sri Vidya, R.V.; Reddy, B.S.; Thomas, L.; Udupa, K.; Kolesar, J.; Rao, M. Potential utility of liquid biopsy as a diagnostic and prognostic tool for the assessment of solid tumors: Implications in the precision oncology. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2020, 70, 7–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yee, N.S.; Kazi, A.A.; Yee, R.K. Current systemic treatment and emerging therapeutic strategies in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Curr. Clin. Pharmacol. 2015, 10, 256–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Yee, N.S.; Lengerich, E.J.; Schmitz, K.H.; Maranki, J.L.; Gusani, N.J.; Tchelebi, L.; Mackley, H.B.; Krok, K.L.; Baker, M.J.; de Boer, C.; et al. Frontiers in gastrointestinal oncology: Advances in multi-disciplinary patient care. Biomedicines 2018, 6, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Lee, E.S.; Lee, J.M. Imaging diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: A state-of-the-art review. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 7864–7877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Puli, S.R.; Bechtold, M.L.; Buxbaum, J.L.; Eloubeidi, M.A. How good is endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in diagnosing the correct etiology for a solid pancreatic mass? A meta-analysis and systematic review. Pancreas 2013, 42, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Buscail, E.; Maulet, C.; Muscari, F.; Chiche, L.; Cordelier, P.; Dabernat, S.; Alix-Panabières, C.; Buscail, L. Liquid biopsy approach for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Cancers 2019, 11, 852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Lee, J.S.; Park, S.S.; Lee, Y.K.; Norton, J.A.; Jeffrey, S.S. Liquid biopsy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Current status of circulating tumor cells and circulating tumor DNA. Mol. Oncol. 2019, 13, 1623–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Wan, Y.; Maurer, M.; He, H.-Z.; Xia, Y.-Q.; Hao, S.-J.; Zhang, W.-L.; Yee, N.S.; Zheng, S.Y. Enrichment of extracellular vesicles with lipid nanoprobe functionalized nanostructured silica. Lab Chip 2019, 19, 2346–2355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Melo, S.A.; Luecke, L.B.; Kahlert, C.; Fernandez, A.F.; Gammon, S.T.; Kaye, J.; LeBleu, V.S.; Mittendorf, E.A.; Weitz, J.; Rahbari, N.; et al. Glypican-1 identifies cancer exosomes and detects early pancreatic cancer. Nature 2015, 523, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Cohen, J.D.; Javed, A.A.; Thoburn, C.; Wong, F.; Tie, J.; Gibbs, P.; Schmidt, C.M.; Yip-Schneider, M.T.; Allen, P.J.; Schattner, M.; et al. Combined circulating tumor DNA and protein biomarker-based liquid biopsy for the earlier detection of pancreatic cancers. PNAS 2017, 114, 10202–10207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Mellby, L.D.; Nyberg, A.P.; Johansen, J.S.; Wingren, C.; Nordestgaard, B.G.; Bojesen, S.E.; Mitchell, B.L.; Shepperd, B.C.; Sears, R.C.; Borrebaeck, C.A.K. Serum biomarker signature-based liquid biopsy for diagnosis of early-stage pancreatic cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 36, 2887–2894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Moutinho-Ribeiro, P.; Macedo, G.; Melo, S.A. Pancreatic cancer diagnosis and management: Has the time come to prick the bubble? Front. Endocrinol. 2019, 9, 779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bernard, V.; Kim, D.U.; San Lucas, F.A.; Castillo, J.; Allenson, K.; Mulu, F.C.; Stephens, B.M.; Huang, J.; Semaan, A.; Guerrero, P.A.; et al. Circulating nucleic acids are associated with outcomes of patients with pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology 2019, 156, 108–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Luchini, C.; Veronese, N.; Nottegar, A.; Cappelletti, V.; Daidone, M.G.; Smith, L.; Parris, C.; Brosens, L.A.A.; Caruso, M.G.; Cheng, L.; et al. Liquid biopsy as surrogate for tissue for molecular profiling in pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis towards precision medicine. Cancers 2019, 11, 1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. A schematic diagram for liquid biopsy towards precision oncology. Liquid biopsy enables the isolation and identification of molecular biomarkers that facilitate early detection and diagnosis of cancer, as well as monitoring treatment response, stratification of patients for therapy, and assessing prognosis. Further investigation of liquid biopsy is indicated for attaining the goal of precision oncology by (i) improving the sensitivity and specificity of the biomarkers for various clinical applications in patients with cancer, (ii) improving the efficiency and cost of the technologies for isolation and analysis of the biomarkers, and (iii) validating the accuracy of the biomarkers in prospective studies with large populations.
Figure 1. A schematic diagram for liquid biopsy towards precision oncology. Liquid biopsy enables the isolation and identification of molecular biomarkers that facilitate early detection and diagnosis of cancer, as well as monitoring treatment response, stratification of patients for therapy, and assessing prognosis. Further investigation of liquid biopsy is indicated for attaining the goal of precision oncology by (i) improving the sensitivity and specificity of the biomarkers for various clinical applications in patients with cancer, (ii) improving the efficiency and cost of the technologies for isolation and analysis of the biomarkers, and (iii) validating the accuracy of the biomarkers in prospective studies with large populations.
Jcm 09 02556 g001

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yee, N.S. Liquid Biopsy: A Biomarker-Driven Tool towards Precision Oncology. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 2556. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082556

AMA Style

Yee NS. Liquid Biopsy: A Biomarker-Driven Tool towards Precision Oncology. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9(8):2556. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082556

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yee, Nelson S. 2020. "Liquid Biopsy: A Biomarker-Driven Tool towards Precision Oncology" Journal of Clinical Medicine 9, no. 8: 2556. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082556

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop