Next Article in Journal
Best Evidence Rehabilitation for Chronic Pain Part 4: Neck Pain
Previous Article in Journal
Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia and PaO2/FIO2 Diagnostic Accuracy: Changing the Paradigm?
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:

Patients with ANCA-Associated Glomerulonephritis and Connective Tissue Diseases: A Comparative Study from the Maine-Anjou AAV Registry

by 1,†, 1,†, 1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 1,5, 1, 1, 1, 3, 2, 6, 6, 5,7, 1,5 and 1,5,*
CHU Angers, Service de Néphrologie-Dialyse-Transplantation, Université d’Angers, 49100 Angers, France
Service de Néphrologie, Centre Hospitalier du Mans, 72037 Le Mans, France
Service de Néphrologie, Centre Hospitalier de Cholet, 49300 Cholet, France
Service de Néphrologie, Centre Hospitalier de Laval, 53000 Laval, France
CRCINA, INSERM, Université de Nantes, Université d’Angers, 49100 Angers, France
CHU Angers, Département de Pathologie Cellulaire et Tissulaire, Université d’Angers, 49100 Angers, France
CHU Angers, Laboratoire d’Immunologie, Université d’Angers, 49100 Angers, France
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8(8), 1218;
Submission received: 15 July 2019 / Revised: 5 August 2019 / Accepted: 12 August 2019 / Published: 14 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Nephrology & Urology)


Background and objectives: The overlap between antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) associated glomerulonephritis (ANCA-GN) and connective tissue diseases (CTD) has been reported mainly as case series in the literature. Frequency of this association, as well as presentation and outcomes are unknown. Materials and Methods: Patients from the Maine-Anjou ANCA-associated vasculitides (AAV) registry with ANCA-GN diagnosed between 01/01/2000 and 01/01/2018, ANCA positivity, and at least six months of follow-up, were included. Results: 106 out of 142 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. CTD was present at ANCA-GN diagnosis in 16 (15.1%) patients. The most common CTD were rheumatoid arthritis, Sjogren syndrome and systemic sclerosis. Compared to the control group, females were more represented in the CTD group (75%, p = 0.001). Renal presentation was comparable between groups, including the pathological analysis of renal biopsies. Patients of CTD group presented a higher rate of non-renal relapse (25% versus 7.7%, p = 0.037), and experienced more frequently a venous thrombotic event (31.2% versus 10%, p = 0.021). No difference between groups was observed according to major outcomes. Conclusion: Association between CTD and ANCA-GN is not a rare condition and predominantly affects females. While AAV presentation is not significantly different, CTD patients experience more frequently non-renal relapse and venous thrombotic events.

1. Introduction

Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculites (AAV) are autoimmune systemic diseases characterized by necrotizing inflammation of small to medium-sized vessels associated with the detection of myeloperoxidase (MPO) or proteinase-3 (PR3) -ANCAs in serum [1,2,3]. Three entities are differentiated on the basis of clinical and pathological criteria, with overlapping clinical spectra: microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) [4]. MPO-ANCAs are mainly observed in association with MPA, while PR3-ANCAs are more frequent in patients with GPA. AAV (GPA and MPA) are rare diseases, with estimated incidence between 13 and 20/million per year and an estimated prevalence between 46 and 184/million depending on ethnicity and geographical factors [5]. Gender distribution is equilibrated, and the peak incidence age is increasing and between 65 and 75 years old [5].
AAV are life-threatening diseases responsible for the burden of high morbidity and mortality rates related to vasculitis, but also to the consequences of the long-term immunosuppressive treatment [6]. Renal involvement is a major prognostic factor for death and indicates the need to start an aggressive immunosuppressive treatment immediately [6]. Pauci-immune crescentic necrotizing glomerulonephritis is the most frequent histological feature, common to GPA and MPA, and accounts for the rapidly and progressive deterioration of renal function. Presently the most widely used induction remission treatment of ANCA-glomerulonephritis (ANCA-GN) combines steroids with cyclophosphamide or rituximab [6]. By these treatments, complete remission is achieved in most patients within three to six months, allowing patients to start a maintenance regimen that aims at preventing AAV relapse.
The association of AAV with other auto-immune diseases or connective tissue diseases (CTD) such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or Sjogren syndrome (SS) is a rare, but not unheard-of condition. Indeed, such associations have been reported in the literature in forms of case reports or case series [7,8,9,10,11]. However, published data do not allow the prevalence of this overlapping syndrome and the nature of CTD subtypes observed in these patients to be concluded. Moreover, the outcome of this subgroup of patients in comparison to other AAV patients has not yet been analyzed.
The aim of the present study was to analyze the frequency and outcome of patients with AAV previously diagnosed with CTD. For this, we used the AAV Maine-Anjou Registry that includes all consecutive AAV patients from the Nephrology Departments of one University Hospital and three Regional Hospitals. We focused on patients that presented with new onset or relapsing AAV with ANCA-GN at diagnosis. The CTD + AAV group was compared to a control AAV group without CTD with regard to AAV presentation and outcome.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population

All consecutive AAV patients with pauci-immune glomerulonephritis diagnosed between 01/01/2000 and 01/01/2018 were identified from the Maine-Anjou AAV registry (registry of patients with AAV admitted to the Nephrology Departments of Angers University hospital and of the Regional Hospitals of Le Mans, Cholet and Laval) and were included in the present study. Patients were eligible if they were aged > 18 years-old, fulfilled the Chapel Hill Consensus Conference criteria for AAV [4], presented with pauci-immune glomerulonephritis at kidney biopsy, positives MPO or PR3 ANCAs and had at least 6 months of follow-ups. ANCA negative patients were excluded. Only the histological data of the first kidney biopsy was considered in the present study.
The study protocol agreed with the Ethics Committee of the Angers University Hospital (authorization number, 2019/06; authorization date, 02/19/2019). All participants of the study gave their oral consent to participate in the registry. Patient records and related data were anonymized prior to analysis.

2.2. Data Collection

Data were collected retrospectively after individual screening of the patients’ medical records. The following data were retrieved: age, gender, weight, and significant medical history. The nature and type of injuries to the affected organs upon AAV presentation were listed. The activity of AAV and organ involvement at diagnosis and relapse were determined in reference to the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) 2003 [12]. Glomerular filtration rate was calculated using the 4-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equation [13]. Therapeutic regimens, retrieved from medical records, were comparable between centers, although they evolved according to AAV standard of care.

2.3. Definitions

Patient records were analyzed and AAV subtype (GPA and MPA) was determined according to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) vasculitis classification algorithm [14]. The identification of renal disease was based on clinical data (active urinary sediment, proteinuria and impaired renal function) and kidney biopsies. Renal death was defined as the need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) for more than 3 months. Relapse was defined as the recurrence or new signs of organ involvement attributable to AAV activity, requiring the need to increase steroids or to start an immunosuppressive treatment. We individualized renal and non-renal relapses. Renal relapses were defined as relapses involving the kidneys, characterized by new or worsening red blood casts and/or worsening proteinuria in association with a rise in serum creatinine of at least 25%. Non-renal relapses were defined as AAV activity in any other organ, solely or in combination, but excluding kidneys.
The diagnosis of CTD was verified according to relevant classifications. In brief, the ACR/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) [15], the ACR [16,17], the 2016 American-European consensus group [18], and the ACR/EULAR 2013 [19] classifications were used for the diagnosis of RA, SLE, GSS and systemic sclerosis (SSc), respectively.
Severe infectious events were defined as infections needing hospital admission. The following cardio-vascular events were retrieved from patients’ records: episodes of myocardial infarction and coronary revascularization, brain strokes, and surgical or endovascular aortic or peripheral artery revascularization. Venous thrombotic events confirmed by CT-scan or Doppler ultrasound were also retrieved.

2.4. Renal Histopathology

All kidney biopsies from the four centers were analyzed centrally in the department of Pathology of the University Hospital of Angers by JPSA and AC. Patients whose biopsy showed less than 10 glomeruli in a light microscopy analysis were excluded from the study. The microscopic analysis of kidney biopsies is routinely reported in a standardized pathological report. Kidney biopsies were classified in the histopathological classification of ANCA-GN [20] and immune deposits by immunofluorescence analysis were quantified as follows: 0, none; 1+, weak; 2+, moderate; 3+, strong.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables are presented as means ± SD and categorical variables as the absolute value and percentage. Differences between groups were analyzed using the χ2 test (or Fisher exact test where applicable) for categorical variables and the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. All the statistical tests were performed to the two-sided 0.05 level of significance. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software® 23.0 for Mackintosh (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) and Graphpad Prism® (San Diego, CA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Baseline Characteristics of Patients of the CTD Group

Among the patients on the registry, 106 fulfilled the inclusion criteria for the study (Figure 1). A diagnosis of CTD was observed at AAV diagnosis in 16 (15.1%) out of 106 successive AAV patients. Patients with CTD were female in 12/16 (75%) cases and their mean age at AAV diagnosis was 65 years old. The main CTD diagnosis was rheumatoid arthritis (n = 5), systemic sclerosis associated and/or Sjogren syndrome (n = 4) and polymyalgia rheumatic (n = 3). The CTD diagnosis preceded the onset of AAV by 7 ± 6.1 years. Ten patients (62.5%) were on steroids or immunosuppressive treatment by the time they were diagnosed with AAV. These data are summarized in Table 1. Figure 2 shows the incidence of AVV and of CTD combined with AAV.

3.2. Baseline Characteristics of AAV Patients According to the Presence or Absence of CTD

Compared to the control group (AAV patients), females were more frequently represented in the CTD group (p = 0.001). The mean age between groups was comparable. There was also no difference according to AAV phenotype or ANCA subtype distribution. Organ involvement at AAV onset did not differ between groups and mean BVAS was comparable. Induction remission treatment relied predominantly on cyclophosphamide and 30% of patients from both groups received plasma exchange. These data are detailed in Table 2.
Anti-nuclear antibodies were detected in 80% of the patients of the CTD group, compared to 47.5% in the control group (p = 0.021, Table 3). A type 3 cryoglobulin positivity was observed in 3 (37.5%) patients in the CTD group, compared to 2 (5.7%) patients in the control group (p = 0.011).

3.3. Comparison of Renal Presentation According to Groups

Although, according to renal involvement at the time of kidney biopsy, the CTD group tended to have lower levels of serum creatinine, eGFR was comparable between groups (Table 2). None of the patients of the CTD group required renal replacement therapy (RRT) at kidney biopsy, while RRT was needed in 15.5% of patients in the AAV group. However, this was not statistically significant (p = 0.21).
The analysis of renal biopsy did not show any significant difference between groups. The percentages of normal, crescentic and fibrotic glomeruli were comparable (Figure 3A), although the patients of the CTD group tended to have a lower percentage of fibrotic glomeruli. When classified according to the histopathological classification of AAV, the distribution of classes was also comparable between groups (Figure 3B).
Glomerular immune deposits in immunofluorescence studies of renal biopsies did not reveal any difference between groups (Table 4).

3.4. Comparison of Outcomes According to Groups

Next, we analyzed the rate and nature of AAV relapses in each group (Table 5). First, the maintenance regimens were compared between groups, with two thirds of patients receiving azathioprine and one third receiving rituximab. The CTD group tended to experience relapses more frequently than the control group (p = 0.096). The rate of non-renal relapse was significantly higher in the CTD group compared to the control group (p = 0.037), while the rate of renal relapses did not differ. The median delay to relapse was 29.5 months in the CTD group and 46.1 months in the control group. The mean dose of steroids between month 6 and month 24, as well as the rate of patients with steroid withdrawal, did not differ between groups.
In a last step, we analyzed other major events including deaths, severe infections requiring hospital admission, cardiovascular events, cancers and venous thrombotic complications (Table 6). We did not observe any difference between the CTD group and the control group with regard to death, cancer, infectious events and cardiovascular events. However, thrombotic events occurred more frequently in the CTD group, affecting 31.2% of patients during their follow-up, compared to 10% in the control group (p = 0.021). When major events were grouped within a composite criterion including death, infections, cardiovascular events cancers and thrombotic events, no difference between groups was observed.

4. Discussion

In the present work, we show that approximately 15% of consecutive AAV patients have a diagnosis of CTD, showing that overlap syndrome is in fact not an uncommon condition in AAV patients. Our study failed to identify any difference in respect to AAV presentation, including renal presentation, between CTD patients and control patients. The main finding of this study is that, despite a higher rate of non-renal AAV relapse and venous thrombosis, CTD patients seem to have a comparable prognosis according to a composite criterion, including major events (deaths, severe infections, cancer, cardiovascular events and thrombotic events). To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to enable the relative frequency of CTD among AAV patients to be estimated and to analyze its impact on them in comparison to a control group.
The most common CTD observed in the AAV patients of the present cohort study were RA, SS and SSc. Interestingly, two patients had an overlapping syndrome associating SSc and SS. Associations between CTD and AAV have mainly been reported as case reports and series in the literature, not allowing the frequency of such associations to be determined. In a recently published study, the frequency of the association between systemic auto-immune diseases and AAV was 11.3%, which is very close to our observation (15.1%) [10]. Interestingly, as in our work, RA, SSc and SS were the most frequently observed CTD. Only one patient was diagnosed with SLE and AAV in our study. While ANCA detection is quite frequent in SLE patients, the association between SLE and AAV seems to be rare. In support, a nationwide French study, only eight patients with both diseases were identified [9]. Recent findings of associations between gene polymorphisms and the risk of AAV may explain why some patients are prone to developing two auto-immune diseases. Indeed, some polymorphisms have been linked to both AAV and CTD development [21,22]. As an example, polymorphisms of the PTPN22 gene have been shown to favor both GPA and RA occurrence [22]. Another explanation may be the exposure to risk factors common to several auto-immune diseases, such as environmental factors or exposure to certain drugs. The pathophysiological connection is also well illustrated by the frequently lowered immune tolerance against ANCA antigens observed in CTD patients. Indeed, ANCA positivity, not only against MPO or PR3-ANCAs, but also against minor ANCA antigens (i.e., lactoferrin, BPI) is frequently observed in CTD. ANCA positivity, with mainly atypical ANCA patterns, has been observed in up to 15% in RA [23,24], 15–30% in SLE [25,26], 35% in SSc [27], and 10% in SS patients [28,29]. However, only a minority of ANCA positive CTD patients will finally develop AAV. These observations suggest the involvement of common pathophysiological auto-immune pathways in the development of AAV and CTD. As expected, significantly more patients were diagnosed with cryoglobulin positivity in CTD group, however, no difference was observed according to rheumatoid factor positivity between groups. This may be explained by a high rate of false positivity of rheumatoid factor detected in AAV patients [30].
We observed that overlap between AAV and CTD occurred more frequently in females, compared to the control group, which was also observed in a previous study [10]. This may result from the higher predisposition of women to developing most of the CTD observed in the present cohort, rather than a specific factor predisposing women to the development of AAV [31].
The present study is the first to compare presentation and outcomes for patients with AAV+CTD to a control group. Apart from sex ratio, we did not observe any other baseline difference between the CTD and control groups. AAV phenotype and ANCA specificity did not differ significantly. This observation does not corroborate the findings from previous case reports and studies, which suggested a predominance of MPA phenotype and MPO ANCA positivity in CTD patients [7,10,28]. We did not observe any difference in AAV organ involvement nor in disease activity between groups at AAV onset. Concerning renal involvement, no difference was observed with regards to kidney function and histological involvement between groups. This suggests that CTD per se may not be a factor able to modulate glomerular auto-immune injury in AAV.
The present work suggests that there are different outcomes for AAV patients with CTD. Indeed, we observed a higher rate of extra-renal AAV relapse in CTD patients compared to the control group, but no difference in the renal and overall relapse rate was observed. This was not likely due to differences in treatment, as both remission induction and maintenance regimens were comparable between groups, including steroid treatment management. The small size of the population and the low number of relapses did not allow to perform multivariate analysis and to adjust on gender and renal function. However, this observation suggests that maintenance regimens in patients with CTD should be carefully monitored and their intensity and duration eventually adjusted. As non-renal relapses involved mainly minor relapses, we also acknowledge that we could have misdiagnosed them as AAV relapses although they could reflect CTD activity.
A major finding of the present work is that the rate of major events was comparable between groups. The only difference was a higher rate of venous thrombotic events in the CTD group, which occurred in more than one third of patients during the follow-up. Discussing the mechanisms accounting for this observation is beyond what we can infer from the present study, but we can suggest that this could be related to a more inflammatory state related to CTD. Thus, AAV+CTD patients should be carefully monitored for thrombosis and prophylactic treatment should be considered more easily in at risk situations for these patients. Finally, after analyzing single and pooled major events, we did not observe any difference between CTD and CTD+AAV patients, suggesting that prognosis does not differ.
The limitations of our study lie in its retrospective design. The follow-up of patients, about 4.5 years, may also represent a limitation of the study. Moreover, we acknowledge that the CTD group is heterogeneous in nature given the multiplicity of CTD and pooling them within one group may be controversial. However, we think that our study adds new knowledge to the field of AAV. By analyzing successive and histologically confirmed AAV, we were able to accurately estimate the prevalence of CTD in AAV patients. Moreover, the Maine-Anjou AAV registry includes data from four regional nephrology centers with very similar treatments and follow-ups between centers.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, CTD in association with ANCA-GN diagnosis is not a rare condition, predominantly affecting women and without any significant differences in AAV presentation. This study suggests that, despite a comparable prognosis, CTD patients have a higher risk of non-renal AAV relapse and of venous thrombotic events.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.-S.G., G.P., A.D. (Assia Djema), R.G. and J.-F.S.; Data curation, F.G. and S.W.; Investigation, F.G., S.W., G.P., A.D. (Assia Djema), R.G., J.D., B.B., M.C., V.B., A.D. (Agnès Duveau), K.E.N., J.-P.C., A.C. (Anne Croue), J.-P.S.-A., A.C. (Alain Chevailler) and J.-F.A.; Methodology, J.-F.A.; Project administration, J.-F.A.; Supervision, J.-F.S. and J.-F.A.; Validation, J.-F.S.; Visualization, G.P.; Writing—original draft, F.G., A.-S.G. and J.-F.A.; Writing—review & editing, G.P., A.D. (Assia Djema), R.G., J.D., B.B., M.C., V.B., A.D. (Agnès Duveau), K.E.N., J.-P.C., A.C. (Anne Croue), J.-P.S.-A., A.C. (Alain Chevailler), J.-F.S. and J.-F.A.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Jennette, J.C.; Falk, R.J.; Hu, P.; Xiao, H. Pathogenesis of antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody-associated small-vessel vasculitis. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2013, 8, 139–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Jennette, J.C.; Falk, R.J. Small-vessel vasculitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 1997, 337, 1512–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Beauvillain, C.; Delneste, Y.; Renier, G.; Jeannin, P.; Subra, J.F.; Chevailler, A. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies: How should the biologist manage them? Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 2008, 35, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jennette, J.C.; Falk, R.J.; Bacon, P.A.; Basu, N.; Cid, M.C.; Ferrario, F.; Flores-Suarez, L.F.; Gross, W.L.; Guillevin, L.; Hagen, E.C.; et al. 2012 revised international chapel hill consensus conference nomenclature of vasculitides. Arthritis Rheum. 2013, 65, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Watts, R.A.; Mahr, A.; Mohammad, A.J.; Gatenby, P.; Basu, N.; Flores-Suarez, L.F. Classification, epidemiology and clinical subgrouping of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (anca)-associated vasculitis. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 2015, 30, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Jennette, J.C.; Nachman, P.H. Anca glomerulonephritis and vasculitis. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2017, 12, 1680–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Quemeneur, T.; Mouthon, L.; Cacoub, P.; Meyer, O.; Michon-Pasturel, U.; Vanhille, P.; Hatron, P.Y.; Guillevin, L.; Hachulla, E. Systemic vasculitis during the course of systemic sclerosis: Report of 12 cases and review of the literature. Med. Baltim. 2013, 92, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Guellec, D.; Cornec-Le Gall, E.; Groh, M.; Hachulla, E.; Karras, A.; Charles, P.; Dunogue, B.; Abad, S.; Alvarez, F.; Gerard, F.; et al. Anca-associated vasculitis in patients with primary sjogren’s syndrome: Detailed analysis of 7 new cases and systematic literature review. Autoimmun. Rev. 2015, 14, 742–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jarrot, P.A.; Chiche, L.; Hervier, B.; Daniel, L.; Vuiblet, V.; Bardin, N.; Bertin, D.; Terrier, B.; Amoura, Z.; Andres, E.; et al. Systemic lupus erythematosus and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis overlap syndrome in patients with biopsy-proven glomerulonephritis. Med. Baltim. 2016, 95, e3748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Martin-Nares, E.; Zuniga-Tamayo, D.; Hinojosa-Azaola, A. Prevalence of overlap of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody associated vasculitis with systemic autoimmune diseases: An unrecognized example of poliautoimmunity. Clin. Rheumatol. 2018, 38, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Draibe, J.; Salama, A.D. Association of anca associated vasculitis and rheumatoid arthritis: A lesser recognized overlap syndrome. Springerplus 2015, 4, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Luqmani, R.A.; Bacon, P.A.; Moots, R.J.; Janssen, B.A.; Pall, A.; Emery, P.; Savage, C.; Adu, D. Birmingham vasculitis activity score (bvas) in systemic necrotizing vasculitis. QJM Mon. J. Assoc. Physicians 1994, 87, 671–678. [Google Scholar]
  13. Levey, A.S.; Bosch, J.P.; Lewis, J.B.; Greene, T.; Rogers, N.; Roth, D. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: A new prediction equation. Modification of diet in renal disease study group. Ann. Intern. Med. 1999, 130, 461–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Watts, R.; Lane, S.; Hanslik, T.; Hauser, T.; Hellmich, B.; Koldingsnes, W.; Mahr, A.; Segelmark, M.; Cohen-Tervaert, J.W.; Scott, D. Development and validation of a consensus methodology for the classification of the anca-associated vasculitides and polyarteritis nodosa for epidemiological studies. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2007, 66, 222–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Aletaha, D.; Neogi, T.; Silman, A.J.; Funovits, J.; Felson, D.T.; Bingham, C.O., 3rd; Birnbaum, N.S.; Burmester, G.R.; Bykerk, V.P.; Cohen, M.D.; et al. 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: An american college of rheumatology/european league against rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum. 2010, 62, 2569–2581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hochberg, M.C. Updating the american college of rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1997, 40, 1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tan, E.M.; Cohen, A.S.; Fries, J.F.; Masi, A.T.; McShane, D.J.; Rothfield, N.F.; Schaller, J.G.; Talal, N.; Winchester, R.J. The 1982 revised criteria for the classification of systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 1982, 25, 1271–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shiboski, C.H.; Shiboski, S.C.; Seror, R.; Criswell, L.A.; Labetoulle, M.; Lietman, T.M.; Rasmussen, A.; Scofield, H.; Vitali, C.; Bowman, S.J.; et al. 2016 american college of rheumatology/european league against rheumatism classification criteria for primary sjogren’s syndrome: A consensus and data-driven methodology involving three international patient cohorts. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017, 69, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Van den Hoogen, F.; Khanna, D.; Fransen, J.; Johnson, S.R.; Baron, M.; Tyndall, A.; Matucci-Cerinic, M.; Naden, R.P.; Medsger, T.A., Jr.; Carreira, P.E.; et al. 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: An american college of rheumatology/european league against rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum. 2013, 65, 2737–2747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Berden, A.E.; Ferrario, F.; Hagen, E.C.; Jayne, D.R.; Jennette, J.C.; Joh, K.; Neumann, I.; Noel, L.H.; Pusey, C.D.; Waldherr, R.; et al. Histopathologic classification of anca-associated glomerulonephritis. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2010, 21, 1628–1636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lyons, P.A.; Rayner, T.F.; Trivedi, S.; Holle, J.U.; Watts, R.A.; Jayne, D.R.; Baslund, B.; Brenchley, P.; Bruchfeld, A.; Chaudhry, A.N.; et al. Genetically distinct subsets within anca-associated vasculitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 367, 214–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Stanford, S.M.; Bottini, N. Ptpn22: The archetypal non-hla autoimmunity gene. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2014, 10, 602–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Braun, M.G.; Csernok, E.; Schmitt, W.H.; Gross, W.L. Incidence, target antigens, and clinical implications of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis. J. Rheumatol. 1996, 23, 826–830. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Rother, E.; Schochat, T.; Peter, H.H. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (anca) in rheumatoid arthritis: A prospective study. Rheumatol. Int. 1996, 15, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Manolova, I.; Dancheva, M.; Halacheva, K. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: Prevalence, antigen specificity, and clinical associations. Rheumatol. Int. 2001, 20, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Schnabel, A.; Csernok, E.; Isenberg, D.A.; Mrowka, C.; Gross, W.L. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus. Prevalence, specificities, and clinical significance. Arthritis Rheum. 1995, 38, 633–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Khanna, D.; Aggarwal, A.; Bhakuni, D.S.; Dayal, R.; Misra, R. Bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein and cathepsin g are the major antigenic targets of antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies in systemic sclerosis. J. Rheumatol. 2003, 30, 1248–1252. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Nishiya, K.; Chikazawa, H.; Hashimoto, K.; Miyawaki, S. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody in patients with primary sjogren’s syndrome. Clin. Rheumatol. 1999, 18, 268–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Ramos-Casals, M.; Nardi, N.; Brito-Zeron, P.; Aguilo, S.; Gil, V.; Delgado, G.; Bove, A.; Font, J. Atypical autoantibodies in patients with primary sjogren syndrome: Clinical characteristics and follow-up of 82 cases. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 2006, 35, 312–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Moon, J.S.; Lee, D.D.; Park, Y.B.; Lee, S.W. Rheumatoid factor false positivy in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis not having medical conditions producing rheumatoid factor. Clin. Rheumatol. 2018, 37, 2771–2779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Van Vollenhoven, R.F. Sex differences in rheumatoid arthritis: More than meets the eye. BMC Med. 2009, 7, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Flowchart of the study. AAV, ANCA-associated vasculitis; ANCA, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody; MPO, myeloperoxidase; PR3, proteinase-3.
Figure 1. Flowchart of the study. AAV, ANCA-associated vasculitis; ANCA, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody; MPO, myeloperoxidase; PR3, proteinase-3.
Jcm 08 01218 g001
Figure 2. Incidence of ANCA-associated vasculitides (AAV) and AAV+CTD in the cohort study according to the year of diagnosis. AAV, ANCA-associated vasculitis; CTD, connective tissue disease.
Figure 2. Incidence of ANCA-associated vasculitides (AAV) and AAV+CTD in the cohort study according to the year of diagnosis. AAV, ANCA-associated vasculitis; CTD, connective tissue disease.
Jcm 08 01218 g002
Figure 3. Analysis of light microscopy of kidney biopsy and comparison according to groups. (A) percentage of normal, crescentic and fibrotic glomeruli according to the presence or absence of CTD. (B) histopathological classes of ANCA-GN according to groups.
Figure 3. Analysis of light microscopy of kidney biopsy and comparison according to groups. (A) percentage of normal, crescentic and fibrotic glomeruli according to the presence or absence of CTD. (B) histopathological classes of ANCA-GN according to groups.
Jcm 08 01218 g003
Table 1. Main characteristics of patients with connective tissue diseases (CTD).
Table 1. Main characteristics of patients with connective tissue diseases (CTD).
Patients (P)GenderCTD
Age at CTDDelay *CTD-Related Organ InvolvementIS **Nature of ISIS at AAV Onset
P1FemaleRA5410 yJointsYesMTXNo
P2FemaleRA722 yJointsYesSteroidsYes (steroids)
P3MaleRA418 yJointsYesSteroids, MTX, anti-TNFYes (anti-TNF)
P4FemaleRA656 yJointsYesSteroids, MTX, anti-TNFYes (anti-TNF)
P5FemaleRA3510 yJointsYesSteroids, MTX, anti-TNFYes (anti-TNF)
P6FemaleSarcoidosis579 yLung, nodes, salivary glandsYesSteroidsNo
P7MaleSSc711 ySkin, Sicca syndromeNo/No
P8FemaleSSc + SS613 ySkin, lung, Sicca syndromeYesSteroidsYes (steroids)
P9FemaleSSc + SS496 ySkin, joints, Raynaud, Sicca syndromeNo/No
P10MaleSS5225 yLungYesSteroidsNo
P11FemaleSLE445 yJointsYesSteroids, HCQYes (steroids)
P12FemalePR743 yJointsYesSteroids, MTXYes (steroids+MTX)
P13FemalePR602 yJointsYesSteroidsYes (steroids)
P14FemalePR741 yJointsYesSteroidsYes (steroids)
P15MaleRP607 yJoints, ear, noseYesSteroids, MTXYes (steroids+MTX)
P16FemalePA5014 yJoints, skinYesMethotrexateNo
RA, Rheumatoid arthritis; SSc, systemic sclerosis; SS, Sjogren syndrome; PR, Polymyalgia rheumatica; RP, Relapsing polychondritis; PA, Psoriatic arthritis; IS, immunosuppressive treatment; MTX, methotrexate; HCQ, Hydroxychloroquine. * between CTD and AAV diagnosis in years; ** before AAV diagnosis
Table 2. Baseline characteristics of AAV patients according to presence or absence of CTD. Significant p values appear in bold.
Table 2. Baseline characteristics of AAV patients according to presence or absence of CTD. Significant p values appear in bold.
VariablesAll, n = 106Connective Tissue Diseases
Yes, n = 16No, n = 90p
Baseline characteristics
Sex (M/F)67/394/1263/270.001
Age (years)63.4 ± 14.065 ± 10.363.1 ± 14.60.619
ANCA-associated vasculitis characteristics
Clinical diagnosis, n (%)
GPA/MPA36 (34)/70 (66.6)7 (43.7)/9 (56.3)29 (32.2)/61 (67.8)0.37
Newly diagnosed98 (92.4)15 (93.7)83 (92.2)0.831
ANCA type, n (%)
c-ANCA/p-ANCA, n (%)32 (30.2)/74 (69.8)7 (43.7)/9 (56.3)25 (27.8)/65 (72.2)0.2
PR3-ANCA/MPO-ANCA, n (%)32 (30.2)/74 (69.8)7 (43.7)/9 (56.3)25 (27.8)/65 (72.2)0.2
BVAS at kidney biopsy17.3 ± 5.715.6 ± 5.317.6 ± 5.80.2
Organ involvement at diagnosis, n (%)
Cutaneous signs20 (18.9)3 (18.7)17 (18.9)1
Ear, nose, throat34 (32.1)6 (37.5)28 (31.1)0.772
Heart6 (5.7)1 (6.2)5 (5.6)1
Digestive4 (3.7)1 (6.2)3 (3.3)0.486
Lung40 (37.7)4 (25)36 (40)0.401
Renal (at kidney biopsy)-
Serum creatinine, µmol/L350.2 ± 296264.7 ± 188364.9 ± 3090.227
eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m232.5 ± 34.735.0 ± 30.232.1 ± 35.50.766
Need for renal replacement therapy, n (%)13 (12.3)0 (0.0)13 (15.5)0.21
Neurological14 (13.2)2 (12.5)12 (13.3)0.928
Induction therapy, n (%)
Cyclophosphamide97 (91.5)14 (87.5)83 (92.2)0.663
Rituximab3 (2.8)1 (6.2)2 (2.2)-
Other6 (5.7)1 (6.2)5 (5.5)-
Plasma exchange31 (29.2)5 (31.2)26 (28.8)0.848
Table 3. Immunological presentation according to groups. Significant p values appear in bold.
Table 3. Immunological presentation according to groups. Significant p values appear in bold.
Connective Tissue Disease
Yes, n = 16No, n = 90p
Antinuclear antibody
Screened patients, n (%)15 (93.7)80 (88.8)0.556
Positives (≥ 1/100), n (%)12 (80)38 (47.5)0.021
≥ 1/200, n (%)8 (50)25 (31.2)0.036
Antigen specificity, number of patients42/
Anti-SSA, n10/
Anti-SSB, n00/
Anti-centromere, n21/
Anti-mitochondrial, M2 subtype, n11/
Anti-GBM antibody
Screened patients, n (%)15 (93.7)71 (78.8)0.161
Positives patients, n (%)1 (6.3)1 (1.1)0.32
Screened patients, n (%)8 (50)35 (38.9)0.402
Positive, n (%)3 (37.5)2 (5.7)0.011
Rheumatoid factor
Screened patients, n (%)5 (31.2)18 (20)0.314
Positive, n (%)4 (80)7 (38.9)0.103
Table 4. Immunofluorescence analysis of kidney biopsy according to study groups. Deposits were graded as follows: 0, none; 1+, weak; 2+, moderate; 3+, strong.
Table 4. Immunofluorescence analysis of kidney biopsy according to study groups. Deposits were graded as follows: 0, none; 1+, weak; 2+, moderate; 3+, strong.
Immunofluorescence StudyAll, n = 106Connective Tissue Disease
Yes, n = 16No, n = 90p
IgG deposits0.12 ± 0.40 ± 00.14 ± 0.50.24
≥2+, n (%)2 (1.9)0 (0)2 (2.2)1
IgA deposits0.14 ± 0.50 ± 00.17 ± 0.50.229
≥2+, n (%)2 (1.9)0 (0)2 (2.2)1
IgM deposits0.89 ± 0.51 ± 0.50.86 ± 0.50.343
≥2+, n (%)7 (6.6)2 (12.5)5 (5.5)0.284
C1q deposits0.2 ± 0.50.2 ± 0.40.17 ± 0.50.821
≥2+, n (%)1 (0.9)0 (0)1 (1.1)1
C3 deposits0.63 ± 0.80.4 ± 0.70.67 ± 0.70.202
≥2+, n (%)11 (10.4)2 (12.5)9 (10)0.67
Table 5. Characteristics of relapses and maintenance regimen according to groups. Significant p-values appear in bold.
Table 5. Characteristics of relapses and maintenance regimen according to groups. Significant p-values appear in bold.
VariablesAll, n = 106Connective Tissue Disease
Yes, n = 16No, n = 90p
Relapses, all, n (%)23 (21.7)6 (37.5)17 (18.8)0.096
Mean delay (months)43.6 ± 43.229.5 ± 30.146.1 ± 44.80.158
Non-renal relapse, n (%)11 (10.4)4 (25)7 (7.7)0.037
Mean delay (months)35.4 ± 3924.6 ± 3441.6 ± 42.90.518
Renal relapse, n (%)12 (11.3)2 (12.5)10 (11.1)1
Mean delay (months)49.1 ± 37.735.7 ± 12.351.7 ± 40.90.607
Steroids at Month 612.5 ± 8.912.3 ± 4.912.5 ± 9.60.935
Steroids at Year 15.5 ± 5.44.5 ± 45.7 ± 5.60.486
Steroids at Year 23.4 ± 9.51.93 ± 2.93.7 ± 10.10.638
Steroid withdrawal72 (67.9)12 (75.0)60 (66.6)0.753
Mean delay18.4 ± 19.115.7 ± 15.319.0 ± 19.90.604
Maintenance regimen, n (%)
Azathioprine68 (64.2)10 (62.5)58 (64.4)0.881
Rituximab33 (31.1)6 (37.5)27 (30)0.55
Other5 (4.7)0 (0)5 (5.6)-
Table 6. Outcomes according to study groups.
Table 6. Outcomes according to study groups.
EventsAll, n = 106Connective Tissue Disease
Yes, n = 16No, n = 90p
Death, n (%)16 (15.1)2 (12.5)14 (15.5)1
Mean delay (months)32 ± 28.237.8 ± 13.231.2 ± 29.80.767
Renal function
eGFR at year 1, mL/min/1.73 m242.1 ± 28.438.8 ± 27.342.6 ± 28.70.709
eGFR at year 3, mL/min/1.73 m244.2 ± 32.655.1 ± 14.642.9 ± 34.10.435
End-stage renal disease, n (%)33 (31.1)5 (31.3)28 (31.1)0.991
Mean delay (months)19.5 ± 27.422.6 ± 20.618.9 ± 28.70.789
Severe infectious events, n (%)48 (45.3)7 (43.7)41 (45.5)0.894
Mean delay (months)23.8 ± 39.113.7 ± 1625.7 ± 41.90.461
Cardiovascular events, n (%)12 (11.3)1 (6.25)11 (12.2)0.688
Mean delay (months)57.1 ± 56.1-62.3 ± 55.9-
Myocardial infarction, n (%)1 (0.9)1 (6.25)0 (0)0.151
Stroke, n (%)2 (1.9)0 (0)2 (2.2)1
Others, n (%)9 (8.5)0 (0)9 (10)0.349
Cancer, n (%)13 (12.3)1 (6.2)12 (13.3)0.686
Mean delay (months)40.9 ± 40-40.9 ± 40-
Solid cancer, n (%)6 (5.7)0 (0)6 (6.7)0.588
Skin cancer, n (%)7 (6.6)1 (6.2)6 (6.7)0.934
Thrombotic events, n (%)14 (14.2)5 (31.2)9 (10)0.021
Mean delay (months)47.2 ± 11.917.1 ± 17.79.03 ± 16.40.461
At least one event, n (%) *66 (62.3)11 (68.7)55 (61.1)0.302
Mean follow-up (months)55.6 ± 52.240.6 ± 40.658.3 ± 53.80.213
* Death, severe infection, cardiovascular event, cancer or thrombotic event. Significant p values appear in bold.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guibert, F.; Garnier, A.-S.; Wacrenier, S.; Piccoli, G.; Djema, A.; Gansey, R.; Demiselle, J.; Brilland, B.; Cousin, M.; Besson, V.; et al. Patients with ANCA-Associated Glomerulonephritis and Connective Tissue Diseases: A Comparative Study from the Maine-Anjou AAV Registry. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 1218.

AMA Style

Guibert F, Garnier A-S, Wacrenier S, Piccoli G, Djema A, Gansey R, Demiselle J, Brilland B, Cousin M, Besson V, et al. Patients with ANCA-Associated Glomerulonephritis and Connective Tissue Diseases: A Comparative Study from the Maine-Anjou AAV Registry. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2019; 8(8):1218.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guibert, Fanny, Anne-Sophie Garnier, Samuel Wacrenier, Giorgina Piccoli, Assia Djema, Renaud Gansey, Julien Demiselle, Benoit Brilland, Maud Cousin, Virginie Besson, and et al. 2019. "Patients with ANCA-Associated Glomerulonephritis and Connective Tissue Diseases: A Comparative Study from the Maine-Anjou AAV Registry" Journal of Clinical Medicine 8, no. 8: 1218.

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop