Next Article in Journal
Electrospun Polyethylene Terephthalate Nanofibers Loaded with Silver Nanoparticles: Novel Approach in Anti-Infective Therapy
Previous Article in Journal
Changes in Spinal and Corticospinal Excitability in Patients with Chronic Ankle Instability: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 8
Issue 7
10.3390/jcm8071038
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Small Cell Lung Cancer Therapeutic Responses Through Fractal Measurements: From Radiology to Mitochondrial Biology

by
Isa Mambetsariev
1,
Tamara Mirzapoiazova
1,
Frances Lennon
2,
Mohit Kumar Jolly
3,
Haiqing Li
4,5,
Mohd W. Nasser
6,
Lalit Vora
7,
Prakash Kulkarni
1,
Surinder K. Batra
6 and
Ravi Salgia
1,*
1
City of Hope, Dept. of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
2
Abbott Molecular, Des Plaines, IL 60018, USA
3
Center for BioSystems Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India
4
City of Hope, Center for Informatics, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
5
City of Hope, Dept. of Computational & Quantitative Medicine, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
6
University of Nebraska Medical Center, Dept. of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Omaha, NE 68198, USA
7
City of Hope, Dept. of Diagnostic Radiology, Duarte, CA 91010, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8(7), 1038; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8071038
Submission received: 20 May 2019 / Revised: 3 July 2019 / Accepted: 11 July 2019 / Published: 16 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Pulmonology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive neuroendocrine disease with an overall 5 year survival rate of ~7%. Although patients tend to respond initially to therapy, therapy-resistant disease inevitably emerges. Unfortunately, there are no validated biomarkers for early-stage SCLC to aid in early detection. Here, we used readouts of lesion image characteristics and cancer morphology that were based on fractal geometry, namely fractal dimension (FD) and lacunarity (LC), as novel biomarkers for SCLC. Scanned tumors of patients before treatment had a high FD and a low LC compared to post treatment, and this effect was reversed after treatment, suggesting that these measurements reflect the initial conditions of the tumor, its growth rate, and the condition of the lung. Fractal analysis of mitochondrial morphology showed that cisplatin-treated cells showed a discernibly decreased LC and an increased FD, as compared with control. However, treatment with mdivi-1, the small molecule that attenuates mitochondrial division, was associated with an increase in FD as compared with control. These data correlated well with the altered metabolic functions of the mitochondria in the diseased state, suggesting that morphological changes in the mitochondria predicate the tumor’s future ability for mitogenesis and motogenesis, which was also observed on the CT scan images. Taken together, FD and LC present ideal tools to differentiate normal tissue from malignant SCLC tissue as a potential diagnostic biomarker for SCLC.

1. Introduction

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive neuroendocrine disease that exhibits rapid growth and early loco-regional and distant metastases [1]. SCLC arises mostly in heavy smokers and accounts for around 13%–15% of all lung cancers [1]. The majority of SCLC patients are diagnosed at late stages, long after the patient begins to exhibit symptoms. For the past 25 years, the standard of care for SCLC has been chemotherapy in combination with radiation for limited stage disease patients, and chemotherapy alone for extensive disease patients. The overall 5 year survival rate in SCLC has also remained constant at 7% [2]. However, more recently, a phase III IMpower133 randomized double-blind study evaluated the addition of a checkpoint inhibitor of programmed death signaling (atezolizumab) to chemotherapy and showed improved benefits with SCLC; while promising, the trial only showed a median overall survival improvement of 2 months [3]. Therefore, early diagnosis is crucial to improving the rate of survival.
The National Lung Screening Trial demonstrated that screening high-risk patients with low-dose computer tomography (CT) scans led to higher numbers of early-stage adenocarcinomas compared with chest X-ray, and led to a reduction in cancer-specific mortality. However, there was no evidence of mortality improvement or an increase in early-stage diagnoses in SCLC cases [4]. No early screening or early detection methods have been proven to be effective for SCLC [4,5,6]. Consequently, the development of more effective biomarkers for and approaches to SCLC early detection remains a critical and immediate goal in treatment of SCLC.
Early detection of SCLC can have a profound effect on outcomes for this devastating disease. To date, there are no validated biomarkers for early stage SCLC, and the only known preventative measure for SCLC is smoking abstinence or cessation. Based on our previous work and the work of others [7], we hypothesized that SCLC progression produces highly self-similar growth patterns that generate fractal geometries not easily distinguished by standard radiology measurements. We predicted that these geometries can distinguish benign tissue from SCLC lesions, and that these geometries correlate with tumor aggressiveness. Accordingly, we propose a novel set of measures of lesion image characteristics and cancer morphology that are based on fractal geometry. Our biomarker measurements are based on the concepts of fractal dimension (FD) and lacunarity (LC): the two key fractal geometric parameters that define self-similarity [7,8].
FD is a measure of shape complexity. It ranges from 1 to infinity, with a value of 1 indicating simple geometry such as a line, with higher values corresponding to more complex patterns. The FD of an SCLC lesion quantifies the complexity of its growth pattern and biological aggressiveness [7,8]. On the other hand, LC is a measure of how objects fill space [7,8,9]. It inversely correlates with density and can be interpreted as a measure of the rotational invariance of an object [9]. For instance, in three dimensions, a sphere would have very low LC, whereas a snowflake would have much higher LC. In this study, LC was utilized as a surrogate for spatial heterogeneity of an SCLC lesion. Fractal properties (FD, LC) were employed to characterize the shape and complex properties of SCLC. Non-trivial measures of FD and LC of cancer in mitochondria, tissue histology, and computed tomography (CT) can be correlated with disease progression [7,8]. SCLC evolves as a fractal on multiple scales, from sub-cellular (nm), to cellular (μm), to lesion (mm), and, therefore, measurements of the geometrical properties on these scales could be used as biomarkers for early detection of SCLC and to inform on the aggressiveness of the tumor. This study aims to provide a biological understanding to standard “radiomic” analysis [10] through an approach that is driven by mathematical measures linked to specific biological hypotheses that can be tested in controlled settings.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Cell Culture and Reagents

Beas-2B, normal transformed human bronchus epithelial cells (ATCC), suspension H69, H82, H526 (ATCC), and adherent SBC3 and SBC5 SCLC cell lines were maintained in RPMI-1640 medium (Corning) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1%(v/v) penicillin/streptomycin, and l-glutamine at 37 °C with 5% CO2, while DMS114 and DMS273 were maintained in eagle minimum essential medium (E-MEM) (Millipore Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) with 10% FBS. The inhibitors for the study cisplatin and mdivi-1 were obtained from Sigma. Mitochondria in live cells were stained with MitoTracker Deep red FM (Life technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Beas-2B cells were grown in tissue-culture-treated plastic (Corning Inc., Corning, NY, USA) for 11 passages. Cells were tested for mycoplasma every 6 months in our laboratory using the MycoProbe Mycoplasma Detection Kit (R&D Systems, #CUL001B, Minneapolis, MN, USA). Short tandem repeat (STR) testing was done before starting the project.

2.2. Immunoblotting

Whole cell lysates were prepared using radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) lysis buffer. Protein concentration for each sample was measured with Bradford protein assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories #5000201, Hercules, CA, USA). Protein expression was detected by immunoblotting as previously described, using MFN2 (Abcam, ab56889, Cambridge, United Kingdom), DRP1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-271583, Dallas, TX, USA), TRAP1 (C8) (Santa Cruz, sc-13134), PGC-1α (Cell Signaling Technology, 2178, Danvers, MA, USA), FIS1 (C10) (Santa Cruz, sc-376469), and pan-actin antibodies (CST, 4968) [11].

2.3. Immunofluorescence

Cells were cultured for 24 h on glass coverslips and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 10 min at 37 °C. Cells were permeabilized in 0.2% Triton X-100 and blocked in 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA)/ phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Coverslips were incubated with primary antibody TOM20 (F10) (Santa Cruz, sc-17764) for 60 minutes at room temperature (RT), followed by Alexa-647 conjugated secondary anti-Mouse. Slides were then mounted using Prolog Gold anti-Fade/DAPI mounting media (Life Technologies). Images were acquired using optimal Airyscan parameters, and Airyscan images were post-processed using the Zeiss Zen Black Airyscan processing function (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Jena, Germany).

2.4. Tissue Microarray

The Institutional Review Board at City of Hope (Duarte, CA, USA) approved all of the human subjects research performed under this study, and all subjects were considered exempt consent. All methods were carried out in accordance with the respective approved protocol. In brief, tissue cores (1 mm punch) from biopsied tissue samples were precisely organized into a grid and embedded in paraffin. The paraffin block was cut and the tissue microarray (TMA) was processed for hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. Pathologic diagnosis in these cases was reviewed by at least two experienced pathologists. The H&E stained TMA was scanned using a 3D-Histech Pannoramic SCAN whole slide scanner (3D-Histech, Budapest, Hungary).

2.5. Immunohistochemistry

Tissues were stained for H&E and immunohistochemistry (IHC) with primary antibodies (MET (D-4) (Santa Cruz, sc-514148), FAK (CST, 3285), pMET (Y1003) (Abcam, ab193270), and pFAK (Y397) (CST, 8586). Tissue regions were selected at random and analyzed for FD and LC from H&E and IHC images to determine the relationship between the FD and LC values for normal and SCLC tissue.

2.6. Fractal Dimension and Lacunarity Analysis

Tumor tissue images were magnified at 15× magnification from whole slide scanned images for FD and LC analysis. ImageJ plugin FracLac was utilized to convert the images of the tumor tissue to grayscale and to calculate the FD and LC of each sample [12]. The box-counting method in this plugin analyzes the grayscale pattern and returns an intensity fractal dimension based on the differences in pixel density in each box. There were 12 initial grid positions that were used, with box sizes that ranged from 2 × 2 pixels and increased until they reached the maximum size of 45% of the image area. FD was estimated from the regression line of a log–log plot of intensity versus box size for each grid position. FD was then calculated as average of these estimates. LC was calculated based on the number of positive pixels in each box at different box sizes.

2.7. Cell Metabolism

A Seahorse Bioscience XF24 Extracellular Flux Analyzer (Seahorse Bioscience, North Billerica, USA) was used to measure OCR (oxygen consumption rates) and ECAR (extracellular acidification rates). Control and mesothelioma cell lines were maintained in normal complete growth media and seeded onto a gelatin-coated 24 well XF Flux analyzer assay plate at 80,000 cells/well 24 h prior to assay. Cells were switched to serum free XF assay media (Seahorse Biosciences, North Billerica, MA, USA) with 25 mM glucose, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, and 2 mM glutamine (Corning) and placed in a CO2-free incubator at least 1 h prior to start of assay. A Seahorse XF24 Analyzer was then used to measure the cellular bioenergetic profile. Each cycle included 3 min of mixing, a 2 min wait, and finally, measurement over 2 min. Four measurements were obtained at baseline and following injection of oligomycin (1 μM; Sigma), FCCP (1 μM; Sigma), and rotenone (1 μM; Sigma). Measurements were normalized to total protein content per well using the Bradford protein assay (Bio-Rad #5000201).

2.8. Cytotoxicity Assays

To determine specific cytotoxicity, we used cell-permeable Calcein-AM (Santa Cruz, #CAS14504-34-1). The hydrolysis of Calcein-AM by intracellular esterases produces Calcein, a hydrophilic, strongly fluorescent compound (488 nm/520 nm) that is well-retained in the cell cytoplasm. Cells were seeded in black-walled, 96 well plates and allowed to adhere in normal growth media for 24 h. Cells were then washed once in PBS and the test compounds were added in 1% serum media at the indicated concentrations for 72 h. The medium was then removed and replaced with 100 ul of phenol red-free Opti-MEM containing 2 μM Calcein-AM and incubated for a further 30 min. Samples were measured using a Bio-Tek Synergy multi-detection microplate reader equipped with 485 nm excitation and 535 nm band-pass emission filter (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA).

2.9. Statistical Analysis

The Graph Pad Prism 5.0 software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA) package was used for the statistical analysis. One-way ANOVA with Tukey multiple comparison post-test was used as appropriate for multiple group comparisons. Student’s t-test was used for pairwise comparisons. All tests were two-sided and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Radiological Quantification of SCLC CT Scans

FD and LC of three patients with SCLC pre- and post-treatment was used to evaluate their tumors on CT scans (Figure 1a). Before treatment, the scanned tumors had a high FD and a low LC, but this effect was reversed after treatment (p < 0.05) (Figure 1b).

3.2. IHC Staining and Fractal Analysis of Normal and Malignant SCLC Tissue.

A novel method that we had previously developed for differentiating tissue was utilized to identify the specific profiles of normal and SCLC tissue [13,14]. Tissues were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), c-MET, phospho c-MET, FAK, and phospho FAK staining, which were then scanned using a 3D-Histech Pannoramic SCAN whole slide scanner, and images were analyzed at 15× magnification using the ImageJ plugin FracLac to calculate the FD and LC (Figure 2a). The total number of tumors analyzed was 24 SCLC tissues and 6 normal lung tissues. SCLC tumor tissues had significantly higher FD and lower LC compared to normal lung tissue (Figure 2b,c; p < 0.01). This pattern was evident for all the antibodies used in this study, suggesting that FD or LC may offer a rapid and quantifiable method to distinguish between benign and malignant tissue for SCLC. As FD is not a unique identifier (i.e., different shapes can have similar FD), LC can be used to help differentiate these shapes (Figure 2d). The utilization of these two parameters in unison could serve as a future predictor of SCLC histology.

3.3. Fractal Analysis of Mitochondrial Morphology in SCLC

The expression of mitochondrial dynamics proteins in SCLC cell lines was analyzed by immunoblotting (Figure 3a). The three SCLC cell lines H69, H82, and H526 were evaluated for the expression of mitochondrial fission and fusion proteins, including MFN2, DRP1, TRAP1α, PGC-1, and FIS1 [15,16]. DRP1 expression was higher in these cell lines compared to MFN2 fusion regulator. DRP1 was highly expressed in the H82 suspension SCLC cell line, more so than in the others. Protein-dependent mitochondrial morphology was evaluated by immunofluorescence staining with Tom20 antibody in untreated (control/DMSO) and treated (cisplatin) cells (Figure 3b). A total of eight control, three dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO)-treated, eight mdivi-1-treated and four cisplatin-treated H69 cells were visualized and evaluated for FD and LC using the FracLac plugin. Control cells had a number of fragmented and disjointed mitochondrial within the cytoplasm. The mitochondria densely packed the entire cytoplasm, as well as overlapping with the nucleus. Cells were treated for 4 h with 4 μM cisplatin, 4 μM mdivi-1, or equal volume of DMSO vehicle control. Visually, it could be inferred that mitochondrial fission in mdivi-1 treated cells was decreased, resulting in a more elongated network. These visual differences were then quantified using FD and LC measurements (Figure 3c). Fractal dimension was significantly different for those four conditions (F (3, 19) = 3.827, p = 0.0267). Cisplatin-treated cells showed increased FD as compared with control (p < 0.05). Mdivi-1 had an increase in the fractal dimension as compared with control, but did not show statistical significance. LC was not significantly different for those four conditions, due to the large variance. However, Figure 3c shows a trend that cisplatin-treated cells had less LC.

3.4. Metabolic Characteristics of SCLC Cells

Mitochondrial activity has been described to be predicated upon the mitochondrial morphology during fission and fusion events within the cell. Fusion morphology has been described as elongated and networked to optimize energy output, meanwhile, fission morphology has fragmented features and a severed mitochondrial network that could be an indicator of mitochondrial dysfunction during removal of damaged components [17,18]. We examined the functional outputs of the various mitochondrial networks by measuring metabolic activity in SCLC cells. Oxidative phosphorylation and glycolysis were measured using oxygen consumption rate (OCR) and extracellular acidification rate (ECAR), respectively. An example of a typical mitochondrial stress test is shown in Figure 4a. Basal OCR was significantly lower in SCLC cell lines, compared to control BEAS-2B cells (Figure 4b). Basal ECAR, a measure of glycolytic activity, was significantly lower in the seven SCLC cell lines compared to BEAS-2B (Figure 4c). Metabolic phenotypes of SCLC cell lines were measured from the ratio of OCR to ECAR. A lower ratio indicates cells were more dependent on glycolysis compared to oxidative phosphorylation [19]. Reserve oxidative respiratory capacity was calculated as the difference between max OCR stimulated by FCCP treatment and basal OCR levels. Three SCLC cell lines (H82, H526, and SBC3) had significantly higher spare respiratory capacities compared to control BEAS-2B cells (Figure 4d). H69, SBC3, SBC5, DMS114, and DMS273 demonstrated increased mitochondrial efficiency coupling respiration to ATP production (Figure 4e).
Figure 5 places the cell lines on the OCR-ECAR plane and provides a snapshot of the basal bioenergetic profile of the cells and how they relate to the control BEAS-2B. H82 was the least energetic cell line (p < 0.05), while BEAS-2B utilized both oxidative phosphorylation (p < 0.05) and glycolysis (p < 0.0001) to meet their energetic needs. DMS114 was more aerobic (p < 0.05) while H526 was more glycolytic (p < 0.05).

3.5. Cytotoxicity of SCLC Cell Lines with Metformin and Mdivi-1

SCLC cell lines, H69, H82, H446, H526, SBC3, SBC5, DMS114, and DMS273, were evaluated for cytotoxicity with cisplatin, a standard chemotherapeutic agent for SCLC, and mitochondrial drug mdivi-1 (Figure 6). SCLC cell lines and control BEAS-2B cells in 1% serum media were treated with increasing concentrations of mdivi-1 and cisplatin, and cell viability was assessed via calcein-AM uptake. MYC was expressed in all cell lines but was not correlated with mdivi-1 cytotoxicity (Supplementary Table S1). The hydrolysis of calcein-AM by intracellular esterases produces calcein, a strongly fluorescent, hydrophilic compound that is well-retained in the cytoplasm. All eight SCLC cell lines were more sensitive to mdivi-1 than were the control BEAS-2B cells. In the case of cisplatin, four cell lines were more sensitive to this treatment, and four cell lines H69, H446, SBC5, and DMS273 had an EC50 value close to or higher than control BEAS-2B cells (Table 1). Cellular differences in response to cisplatin were comparable with clinical chemotherapy treatment, which for SCLC tumors often results in significant tumor shrinkage, however, relapse is usually quite rapid because of genetic and non-genetic tumor heterogeneity [20].

4. Discussion

SCLC has a high propensity for early metastases, and a deceptively positive initial response to cytotoxic chemotherapy that is often followed by acquired resistance [21]. Unlike in the case of non-small cell lung cancer, there are no tools for the early detection of SCLC [4,5,6]. Currently, CT imaging and biopsies are used to diagnose and monitor the disease, but these techniques offer a constrained view of early diagnosis, disease progression, and treatment monitoring. These efforts, and related investigations using serum biomarkers such as miRNA and CEA/chromogranin/NSE, have failed to produce validated biomarkers of early detection [22]. This complicates clinical management of SCLC, as the diagnosis occurs largely during late stages and the tumor morphology is ubiquitously pervasive with high metastatic potential [23,24]. In contrast to adenocarcinoma lung tumors, which grow more uniformly, compounded upon the primary tumor sites [25], SCLC is observed to exhibit invasive growth through the various alveoli, veins, and bronchi by expanding without preserving its central size or shape [26,27]. This leaves a layer of necrosis at the cancer origin site that cannot be easily quantified on 2D CT images. Furthermore, there is a dearth of genomic data in SCLC, primarily characterized by TP53 and RB1 alterations [28], which suggests that biomarkers should be pursued in areas of plentiful data such as CT scans, tissue immunohistochemical slides, and cell lines to determine how the self-similar and fractal nature of these images can act as a predictive model for clinical management. SCLC also has a unique fractal microenvironment that is self-similar at the cell level, tissue level, thoracic level, and metastatic site level, where the features of the metastatic tumors predicate themselves on the initial conditions of the primary site [27,29]. To demonstrate the clinical use of these measurements, we applied them across multiple scales from radiological to the cellular scale, where we measured the FD and LC of CT images, tissue, cells, and mitochondria. The data showed consistent correlations, providing strong evidence that macroscopic FD and LC measurements reflect differences in the tumor cells that give rise to them.

4.1. The Lung Is a Fractal Pattern

Fractals are mathematical constructs that show self-similarity over a range of scales and non-integer fractal dimensions [30]. Evaluation of FD and LC quantifies the irregular spatial patterns present in SCLC growth, which relates to specifics of the initial tumor and has the ability to predict its future course of evolution, as well as response to treatment [7,31]. This tool, when applied to image analysis, together with cellular and tissue analyses, could be useful in both early diagnosis and classification of the tumor in patients with SCLC. This study presented the fractal measurements of SCLC at different magnifications from cellular to tissue to cell lines, and the unique fractal properties were quantified utilizing FD and LC. The advantage of utilizing fractal geometry methods is that, unlike Euclidean methods, they are able to quantify and analyze complex, dimensionless structures through FD and LC measurements [9,30]. Fractal methodology has been used to quantify the complex lung physiology at various branching levels [32,33,34,35,36,37]. Since different tumors and lung characteristics, at a microscopic scale, will create different patterns of growth that are reflected at the macroscopic patterns of the tumor, FD and lacunarity (LC) can not only differentiate benign from malignant, but can also provide additional information on the biology of the tumor.
The lung follows a branching fractal pattern where the various alveoli and bronchioles exhibit self-similarity across different scales [7,38,39]. Lung morphogenesis is an iterative process that begins with the bifurcation of the developing trachea into the left and right lung buds [39,40,41,42]. Following a sequential branching pattern, the lung buds grow and divide to form a fractal space-filling, tree-like architecture with 23 generations of branching [40,41,42]. Similarly, the pulmonary vasculature develops alongside the airways, and the gas exchange surfaces are formed on the peripheral generations of the branching system (Figure 1). The branching structure of the acinus has a slightly different branching structure to the conducting region of the lung, and its architecture is elegantly described by the Hilbert curve fractal [43]. However, images of the lung obtained at different magnifications exhibit self-similarity, thus, they are amenable to characterization and measurement using fractal geometry (Figure 1). From a functional perspective, the fractal branching pattern of the lung also regulates recruitment of the terminal airspaces from a previously unventilated compartment during inhalation [38,39]. Fractal branching is, therefore, a fundamental and crucial feature of lung development and function, and tumor development at a lower biological scale will be reflected in a disturbance in this fractal pattern.

4.2. Radiological Measurements of Fractal Geometry

The alterations in lung structure that define the appearance of lung cancer in medical images are most often described in simple terms rather than the precise quantifiable measurements afforded by modern imaging and analysis tools [44,45]. For example, lung nodules are commonly characterized by size and volume, because other characteristics such as shape or CT density did not predict the presence of lung cancer in several studies, despite the intricately detailed information present in images [46,47,48,49]. However, several studies that evaluated the fractal texture analysis of solitary pulmonary nodules were able to statistically outperform radiologists for identification of lung nodules [50,51]. This discrepancy, we believe, is due in part to the use of classic Euclidean geometry, which distinguishes gross differences in geometry, such as volume, but there is information hidden in the complexity of the structure, such as texture and statistical properties of shape, that often goes uncaptured [50,51,52]. Thus, non-trivial measures of FD and LC of SCLC at the cellular level, tissue level, and organ level by quantifying cell lines, histological slides, and CT scans, are expected to exhibit a similar pattern. Pre-treatment CT scans were characterized by a high FD (high complexity) and low LC (homogeneous), while the post-treatment scans showed a low FD (low complexity) and high LC (more heterogeneity). We found these measurements to reflect the initial conditions of the tumor, its growth rate, and the condition of the lung. The initial features of the tumor, FD and LC, were affected in a similar pattern across a number of patients pre- and post-treatment. These self-similar morphological abnormalities are already under consideration of FD analysis to detect clinically relevant changes during lung cancer development and treatment in radiology [53,54,55,56].

4.3. Fractal Patterns of Tumor Tissue Differentiate SCLC

The fractal dimension box counting method has been capable of differentiating between malignant and normal tissue in a number of neoplastic studies involving hepatocellular carcinoma [57], endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma [58], oral squamous cell carcinoma [59], breast cancer [60,61], prostate adenocarcinoma [62], and renal cell carcinoma [63]. However, it was not until more recently that FD was utilized alongside LC as an additional parameter of fractal geometry to quantify colorectal adenocarcinomas [64,65], breast cancer [66], and cervical cancer [67]. Fractal analysis, while unable to differentiate individual shapes with a unique identifying number, can be utilized as a measure of homogeneity, with lower values indicating decreasing self-similarity in an image [57,68,69]. Fractal LC, meanwhile, analyzes the texture within the image beyond what can be observed with standard measurements, making it ideal to quantify the complexity of stained tissue [64,70,71]. Gheonea et al. demonstrated that FDs can be used to distinguish between malignant and benign histological images, and even to distinguish between primary and metastatic tumors within liver [71]. While fractal measurements have been met with success in other cancer types, this is the first study to apply these methods to SCLC. While other pathological markers, such as synaptophysin and chromogranin, are utilized to diagnose small cell lung cancer, more efforts are needed to differentiate the unique small cell lung cancer patterns that may correlate with treatment response and tumor burden. This makes FD and LC the ideal tools to differentiate normal tissue from malignant SCLC tissue as a potential diagnostic biomarker for SCLC.
We observed that the FD values of all SCLC tissues stained for H&E, c-MET, phospho c-MET, FAK, and phospho-FAK were significantly higher than the FD values of normal tissue. One explanation may be that the SCLC tissue exhibits a more homogeneous fractal phenotype due to the self-similarity of the cancer clusters within the tissue. This is re-affirmed by the lower LC in SCLC tissue that indicates the low heterogeneity, while the high FD signifies their high complexity. However, these observations are unsurprising, as SCLC tissue is often characterized by densely packed, self-similar clusters with features of nuclear molding, finely granular (salt and pepper) chromatin, and scant delicate cytoplasm [72,73]. A higher FD has been shown to be associated with high distant metastatic risk in breast cancer tissue [66], but a high lacunarity was associated with lower metastatic risk, as observed in our normal lung tissue. These observations hint at a possibility that the fractal measurements of SCLC tissue may not only differentiate between normal and cancer tissue, but could potentially be shown to be a prognostic biomarker of progression and resistance.

4.4. Dysfunction of Mitochondrial Morphology Correlates with Fission and Fusion Dynamics

At the sub-cellular level, mitochondria exist as a dynamic intracellular network, playing a vital role in cellular architecture and cellular metabolism that allows them to respond and adapt throughout the cell cycle and to withstand cell stresses such as increased energy demand, nutrient deprivation, or hypoxia [17,74]. Mitochondrial networks are often elongated, fragmented, or reticulated, making them ideal candidates to examine using fractal geometry. These classifications are indicative of the relative rates of fission and fusion occurring within the network, and may change depending on the state of the cell, especially in early stages of SCLC. The mitochondrial network is thought to be linked to the overall dysfunction of the mitochondria, which allows cancer cells to utilize irregular atypical energy production mechanisms. The mitochondrial network is also reliant on the balance between fission and fusion events that regulate mitochondrial dynamics, or the movement of mitochondria along the cytoskeleton and alteration of their morphology. Cancer cell metabolism and mitochondrial dynamics have been gaining traction as a viable emerging therapeutic target, and mitochondrial DNA has been shown to be a requirement for carcinogenesis [75,76,77].
In our study, gain of the reserve respiratory capacity correlated to cellular resistance to stress, and the coupling efficiency indicates the proportion of respiratory activity involved in ATP production. Our results show a correlation in SCLC cell line between increased glycolysis rate and attenuated respiration capacity, as classically first observed by Warburg and termed the Warburg Effect [78,79]. This metabolic switch allows cancer cells to produce the energy required for proliferation. However, the unique feature of SCLC is that it is not only highly proliferative, but has an adaptive metabolic plasticity that allows it to preserve its metastatic potential as it travels throughout the organism [80]. This aspect is compounded in SCLC cells that go through a reiterative process of forming dense clusters of tumor cells that penetrate the blood barrier and enter the blood stream as a cluster rather than individual cells [81,82], similar to observations in another highly aggressive cancer: inflammatory breast cancer [83]. We observed that LC of the mitochondria decreased with treatment, indicating lowered heterogeneity of the mitochondrial network, and the increased fractal dimension could hint at a possible increase in complexity due to mitochondrial damage. Therefore, the metabolic uptake of the cell lines and the observed morphological changes in the mitochondria predicate the tumor’s future ability for mitogenesis and motogenesis, as was also observed on the CT scan images.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/8/7/1038/s1, Table S1: MYC status in SCLC cell lines.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.M., T.M., F.L., M.K.J., M.W.N, P.K., S.K.B., and R.S.; methodology, I.M., T.M., F.L., H.L., and R.S.; formal analysis, T.M., F.L., and H.L.; investigation, T.M. and F.L.; resources, P.K., S.K.B, and R.S.; data curation, I.M., T.M., F.L., and H.L.; writing—original draft preparation, I.M., T.M., F.L., M.K.J., M.W.N., P.K., S.K.B., R.S.; writing—review and editing, I.M., T.M., F.L., M.K.J., M.W.N., L.V., P.K., S.K.B., R.S.; visualization, I.M., T.M., F.L., H.L., L.V.; supervision, P.K., S.K.B., and R.S.

Funding

(1) Core facilities: Research reported in this publication included work performed in the Biostatistics Core and Center for Informatics Core supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award number P30CA033572. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health; (2) Pilot Projects and Early Phase (3) Clinical Research Support: Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award number P30CA033572, U54CA209978, and R01CA218545. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Acknowledgments

We thank the clinical staff for their skill and dedication in helping the patients presented in this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

S.K.B. is a co-founder of Sanguine Diagnostics and Therapeutics, Inc. The other authors disclosed no potential conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Gazdar, A.F.; Bunn, P.A.; Minna, J.D. Small-cell lung cancer: What we know, what we need to know and the path forward. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2017, 17, 725–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2016, 66, 7–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Horn, L.; Mansfield, A.S.; Szczęsna, A.; Havel, L.; Krzakowski, M.; Hochmair, M.; Huemer, F.; Losonczy, G.; Johnson, M.L.; Nishio, M.; et al. First-Line Atezolizumab plus Chemotherapy in Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 379, 2220–2229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team; Aberle, D.R.; Adams, A.M.; Berg, C.D.; Black, W.C.; Clapp, J.D.; Fagerstrom, R.M.; Gareen, I.F.; Gatsonis, C.; Marcus, P.M.; et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011, 365, 395–409. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Thomas, A.; Pattanayak, P.; Szabo, E.; Pinsky, P. Characteristics and Outcomes of Small Cell Lung Cancer Detected by CT Screening. Chest 2018, 154, 1284–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Aberle, D.R.; Demello, S.; Berg, C.D.; Black, W.C.; Brewer, B.; Church, T.R.; Clingan, K.L.; Duan, F.; Fagerstrom, R.M.; Gareen, I.F.; et al. Results of the two incidence screenings in the National Lung Screening Trial. New Engl. J. Med. 2013, 369, 920–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lennon, F.E.; Cianci, G.C.; Cipriani, N.A.; Hensing, T.A.; Zhang, H.J.; Chen, C.T.; Murgu, S.D.; Vokes, E.E.; Vannier, M.W.; Salgia, R. Lung cancer-a fractal viewpoint. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2015, 12, 664–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lennon, F.E.; Cianci, G.C.; Kanteti, R.; Riehm, J.J.; Arif, Q.; Poroyko, V.A.; Lupovitch, E.; Vigneswaran, W.; Husain, A.; Chen, P.; et al. Unique fractal evaluation and therapeutic implications of mitochondrial morphology in malignant mesothelioma. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 24578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tolle, C.R.; McJunkin, T.R.; Gorsich, D.J. An efficient implementation of the gliding box lacunarity algorithm. Phys. D Nonlinear Phenm. 2008, 237, 306–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Parmar, C.; Leijenaar, R.T.; Grossmann, P.; Rios, V.E.; Bussink, J.; Rietveld, D.; Rietbergen, M.M.; Haibe-Kains, B.; Lambin, P.; Aerts, H.J. Radiomic feature clusters and prognostic signatures specific for Lung and Head & Neck cancer. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 11044. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kanteti, R.; Dhanasingh, I.; Kawada, I.; Lennon, F.E.; Arif, Q.; Bueno, R.; Hasina, R.; Husain, A.N.; Vigneswaran, W.; Seiwert, T.; et al. MET and PI3K/mTOR as a potential combinatorial therapeutic target in malignant pleural mesothelioma. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e105919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Karperien, A. (1999-2013) FracLac for ImageJ. Available online: https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/plugins/fraclac/FLHelp/FLCitations.htm (accessed on 1 January 2019.).
  13. Cross, S.S. Fractals in pathology. J. Pathol. 1997, 182, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Karperien, A.; Ahammer, H.; Jelinek, H.F. Quantitating the subtleties of microglial morphology with fractal analysis. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2013, 7, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Zhao, J.; Zhang, J.; Yu, M.; Xie, Y.; Huang, Y.; Wolff, D.W.; Abel, P.W.; Tu, Y. Mitochondrial dynamics regulates migration and invasion of breast cancer cells. Oncogene 2013, 32, 4814–4824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Loson, O.C.; Song, Z.; Chen, H.; Chan, D.C. Fis1, Mff, MiD49, and MiD51 mediate Drp1 recruitment in mitochondrial fission. Mol. Biol. Cell 2013, 24, 659–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Westermann, B. Bioenergetic role of mitochondrial fusion and fission. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1817, 1833–1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Dorn, G.W., 2nd. Mitochondrial dynamism and heart disease: Changing shape and shaping change. EMBO Mol. Med. 2015, 7, 865–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Radde, B.N.; Ivanova, M.M.; Mai, H.X.; Salabei, J.K.; Hill, B.G.; Klinge, C.M. Bioenergetic differences between MCF-7 and T47D breast cancer cells and their regulation by oestradiol and tamoxifen. Biochem. J. 2015, 465, 49–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Shue, Y.T.; Lim, J.S.; Sage, J. Tumor heterogeneity in small cell lung cancer defined and investigated in pre-clinical mouse models. Transl. Lung Cancer Res. 2018, 7, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Byers, L.A.; Rudin, C.M. Small cell lung cancer: Where do we go from here? Cancer 2015, 121, 664–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ma, P.C.; Blaszkowsky, L.; Bharti, A.; Ladanyi, A.; Kraeft, S.K.; Bruno, A.; Skarin, A.T.; Chen, L.B.; Salgia, R. Circulating tumor cells and serum tumor biomarkers in small cell lung cancer. Anticancer Res. 2003, 23, 49–62. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Bunn, P.A., Jr.; Minna, J.D.; Augustyn, A.; Gazdar, A.F.; Ouadah, Y.; Krasnow, M.A.; Berns, A.; Brambilla, E.; Rekhtman, N.; Massion, P.P.; et al. Small Cell Lung Cancer: Can Recent Advances in Biology and Molecular Biology Be Translated into Improved Outcomes? J. Thorac. Oncol. Off. Publ. Int. Assoc. Study Lung Cancer 2016, 11, 453–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Giuseppe Lo, R.; Macerelli, M.; Platania, M.; Zilembo, N.; Vitali, M.; Signorelli, D.; Proto, C.; Ganzinelli, M.; Gallucci, R.; Agustoni, F.; et al. Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Clinical Management and Unmet Needs New Perspectives for an Old Problem. Curr. Drug Targets 2017, 18, 341–362. [Google Scholar]
  25. Carney, D.N. The biology of lung cancer. Curr. Opin. Pulm. Med. 1995, 1, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sattler, M.; Salgia, R. Molecular and cellular biology of small cell lung cancer. Semin. Oncol. 2003, 30, 57–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Travis, W.D. Update on small cell carcinoma and its differentiation from squamous cell carcinoma and other non-small cell carcinomas. Mod. Pathol. 2012, 25, S18–S30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. George, J.; Lim, J.S.; Jang, S.J.; Cun, Y.; Ozretic, L.; Kong, G.; Leenders, F.; Lu, X.; Fernandez-Cuesta, L.; Bosco, G.; et al. Comprehensive genomic profiles of small cell lung cancer. Nature 2015, 524, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Salgia, R.; Mambetsariev, I.; Hewelt, B.; Achuthan, S.; Li, H.; Poroyko, V.; Wang, Y.; Sattler, M. Modeling small cell lung cancer (SCLC) biology through deterministic and stochastic mathematical models. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 26226–26242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Weibel, E.R. Fractal geometry: A design principle for living organisms. Am. J. Physiol. 1991, 261, L361–L369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ahmed, E. Fractals and chaos in cancer models. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 1993, 32, 353–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Altemeier, W.A.; McKinney, S.; Glenny, R.W. Fractal nature of regional ventilation distribution. J. Appl. Physiol. (1985) 2000, 88, 1551–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Glenny, R.W.; Robertson, H.T. Fractal properties of pulmonary blood flow: Characterization of spatial heterogeneity. J. Appl. Physiol. (1985) 1990, 69, 532–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Glenny, R.W.; Robertson, H.T. Fractal modeling of pulmonary blood flow heterogeneity. J. Appl. Physiol. (1985) 1991, 70, 1024–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Moledina, S.; de Bruyn, A.; Schievano, S.; Owens, C.M.; Young, C.; Haworth, S.G.; Taylor, A.M.; Schulze-Neick, I.; Muthurangu, V. Fractal branching quantifies vascular changes and predicts survival in pulmonary hypertension: A proof of principle study. Heart 2011, 97, 1245–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Mishima, M.; Hirai, T.; Itoh, H.; Nakano, Y.; Sakai, H.; Muro, S.; Nishimura, K.; Oku, Y.; Chin, K.; Ohi, M.; et al. Complexity of terminal airspace geometry assessed by lung computed tomography in normal subjects and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 8829–8834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Boser, S.R.; Park, H.; Perry, S.F.; Menache, M.G.; Green, F.H. Fractal geometry of airway remodeling in human asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2005, 172, 817–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Sauret, V.; Halson, P.M.; Brown, I.W.; Fleming, J.S.; Bailey, A.G. Study of the three-dimensional geometry of the central conducting airways in man using computed tomographic (CT) images. J. Anat. 2002, 200, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Horsfield, K. Diameters, generations, and orders of branches in the bronchial tree. J. Appl. Physiol. (1985) 1990, 68, 457–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Iber, D.; Menshykau, D. The control of branching morphogenesis. Open Biol. 2013, 3, 130088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Kitaoka, H.; Takaki, R.; Suki, B. A three-dimensional model of the human airway tree. J. Appl. Physiol. (1985) 1999, 87, 2207–2217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Weibel, E.R. What makes a good lung? Swiss Med. Wkly. 2009, 139, 375–386. [Google Scholar]
  43. Fleury, V. [A fundamental symmetry between morphogenesis and function of branched organs]. Compt. Rendus Acad. Sci. III 2001, 324, 405–412. [Google Scholar]
  44. Oxnard, G.R.; Zhao, B.; Sima, C.S.; Ginsberg, M.S.; James, L.P.; Lefkowitz, R.A.; Guo, P.; Kris, M.G.; Schwartz, L.H.; Riley, G.J. Variability of lung tumor measurements on repeat computed tomography scans taken within 15 min. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011, 29, 3114–3119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Nishino, M.; Guo, M.; Jackman, D.M.; DiPiro, P.J.; Yap, J.T.; Ho, T.K.; Hatabu, H.; Janne, P.A.; Van den Abbeele, A.D.; Johnson, B.E. CT tumor volume measurement in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Performance characteristics of an emerging clinical tool. Acad. Radiol. 2011, 18, 54–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Xu, D.M.; van Klaveren, R.J.; de Bock, G.H.; Leusveld, A.L.; Dorrius, M.D.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, Y.; de Koning, H.J.; Scholten, E.T.; Verschakelen, J.; et al. Role of baseline nodule density and changes in density and nodule features in the discrimination between benign and malignant solid indeterminate pulmonary nodules. Eur. J. Radiol. 2009, 70, 492–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Gould, M.K.; Ananth, L.; Barnett, P.G. A clinical model to estimate the pretest probability of lung cancer in patients with solitary pulmonary nodules. Chest 2007, 131, 383–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. McWilliams, A.; Tammemagi, M.C.; Mayo, J.R.; Roberts, H.; Liu, G.; Soghrati, K.; Yasufuku, K.; Martel, S.; Laberge, F.; Gingras, M.; et al. Probability of cancer in pulmonary nodules detected on first screening CT. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 369, 910–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Xu, D.M.; van Klaveren, R.J.; de Bock, G.H.; Leusveld, A.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Vliegenthart, R.; de Koning, H.J.; Scholten, E.T.; Verschakelen, J.; et al. Limited value of shape, margin and CT density in the discrimination between benign and malignant screen detected solid pulmonary nodules of the NELSON trial. Eur. J. Radiol. 2008, 68, 347–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Vittitoe, N.F.; Baker, J.A.; Floyd, C.E., Jr. Fractal texture analysis in computer-aided diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules. Acad. Radiol. 1997, 4, 96–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Xue, X.; Yang, Y.; Huang, Q.; Cui, F.; Lian, Y.; Zhang, S.; Yao, L.; Peng, W.; Li, X.; Pang, P.; et al. Use of a Radiomics Model to Predict Tumor Invasiveness of Pulmonary Adenocarcinomas Appearing as Pulmonary Ground-Glass Nodules. BioMed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hung, S.H.; Lin, C.Y.; Lee, J.Y.; Tseng, H. Computed tomography image characteristics of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Auris Nasus Larynx 2012, 39, 606–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Hayano, K.; Lee, S.H.; Yoshida, H.; Zhu, A.X.; Sahani, D.V. Fractal analysis of contrast-enhanced CT images to predict survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sunitinib. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2014, 59, 1996–2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Kido, S.; Kuriyama, K.; Higashiyama, M.; Kasugai, T.; Kuroda, C. Fractal analysis of internal and peripheral textures of small peripheral bronchogenic carcinomas in thin-section computed tomography: Comparison of bronchioloalveolar cell carcinomas with nonbronchioloalveolar cell carcinomas. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 2003, 27, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Michallek, F.; Dewey, M. Fractal analysis in radiological and nuclear medicine perfusion imaging: A systematic review. Eur. Radiol. 2014, 24, 60–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Miwa, K.; Inubushi, M.; Wagatsuma, K.; Nagao, M.; Murata, T.; Koyama, M.; Koizumi, M.; Sasaki, M. FDG uptake heterogeneity evaluated by fractal analysis improves the differential diagnosis of pulmonary nodules. Eur. J. Radiol. 2014, 83, 715–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Streba, C.T.; Pirici, D.; Vere, C.C.; Mogoanta, L.; Comanescu, V.; Rogoveanu, I. Fractal analysis differentiation of nuclear and vascular patterns in hepatocellular carcinomas and hepatic metastasis. Romanian J. Morphol. Embryol. 2011, 52, 845–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bikou, O.; Delides, A.; Drougou, A.; Nonni, A.; Patsouris, E.; Pavlakis, K. Fractal Dimension as a Diagnostic Tool of Complex Endometrial Hyperplasia and Well-differentiated Endometrioid Carcinoma. In Vivo 2016, 30, 681–690. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  59. Bose, P.; Brockton, N.T.; Guggisberg, K.; Nakoneshny, S.C.; Kornaga, E.; Klimowicz, A.C.; Tambasco, M.; Dort, J.C. Fractal analysis of nuclear histology integrates tumor and stromal features into a single prognostic factor of the oral cancer microenvironment. BMC Cancer 2015, 15, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Jitaree, S.; Phinyomark, A.; Boonyaphiphat, P.; Phukpattaranont, P. Cell type classifiers for breast cancer microscopic images based on fractal dimension texture analysis of image color layers. Scanning 2015, 37, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Rajkovic, N.; Li, X.; Plataniotis, K.N.; Kanjer, K.; Radulovic, M.; Milosevic, N.T. The Pan-Cytokeratin Staining Intensity and Fractal Computational Analysis of Breast Tumor Malignant Growth Patterns Prognosticate the Occurrence of Distant Metastasis. Front. Oncol. 2018, 8, 348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Ushenko, A.; Yermolenko, S.; Prydij, A.; Guminetsky, S.; Gruia, I.; Toma, O.; Vladychenko, K. Statistical and fractal approaches in laser polarimetry diagnostics of the cancer prostate tissues—art. no. 70082C. In Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering (Proceedings of SPIE), Chernivtsi, Ukraine, 11 September 2007. [Google Scholar]
  63. Sabo, E.; Boltenko, A.; Sova, Y.; Stein, A.; Kleinhaus, S.; Resnick, M.B. Microscopic analysis and significance of vascular architectural complexity in renal cell carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2001, 7, 533–537. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  64. Stefanescu, D.; Streba, C.; Cartana, E.T.; Saftoiu, A.; Gruionu, G.; Gruionu, L.G. Computer Aided Diagnosis for Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy in Advanced Colorectal Adenocarcinoma. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0154863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Franzen, L.E.; Hahn-Stromberg, V.; Edvardsson, H.; Bodin, L. Characterization of colon carcinoma growth pattern by computerized morphometry: Definition of a complexity index. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2008, 22, 465–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Pribic, J.; Vasiljevic, J.; Kanjer, K.; Konstantinovic, Z.N.; Milosevic, N.; Vukosavljevic, D.N.; Radulovic, M.; Zivic, N. Fractal dimension and lacunarity of tumor microscopic images as prognostic indicators of clinical outcome in early breast cancer. Biomark. Med. 2015, 9, 1277–1279. [Google Scholar]
  67. Hernández Velázquez, J.d.D.; Mejia-Rosales, S.; Gama Goicochea, A. Fractal properties of biophysical models of pericellular brushes can be used to differentiate between cancerous and normal cervical epithelial cells. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2018, 170, 572–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Delides, A.; Ioannis, P.; Alegakis, T.; Kyroudi, A.; Banis, C.; Pavlaki, A.; Helidonis, E.; Kittas, C. Fractal dimension as a prognostic factor for laryngeal carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 2005, 25, 2141–2144. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  69. Goutzanis, L.; Papadogeorgakis, N.; Pavlopoulos, P.M.; Katti, K.; Petsinis, V.; Plochoras, I.; Pantelidaki, C.; Kavantzas, N.; Patsouris, E.; Alexandridis, C. Nuclear fractal dimension as a prognostic factor in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2008, 44, 345–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Dey, P. Basic principles and applications of fractal geometry in pathology: A review. Anal. Quant. Cytol. Histol. 2005, 27, 284–290. [Google Scholar]
  71. Gheonea, D.I.; Streba, C.T.; Vere, C.C.; Serbanescu, M.; Pirici, D.; Comanescu, M.; Streba, L.A.; Ciurea, M.E.; Mogoanta, S.; Rogoveanu, I. Diagnosis system for hepatocellular carcinoma based on fractal dimension of morphometric elements integrated in an artificial neural network. Biomed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 239706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Sturgis, C.D.; Nassar, D.L.; D’Antonio, J.A.; Raab, S.S. Cytologic features useful for distinguishing small cell from non-small cell carcinoma in bronchial brush and wash specimens. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2000, 114, 197–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Nicholson, S.A.; Beasley, M.B.; Brambilla, E.; Hasleton, P.S.; Colby, T.V. Small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC): A clinicopathologic study of 100 cases with surgical specimens. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2002, 26, 1184–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Mishra, P.; Chan, D.C. Mitochondrial dynamics and inheritance during cell division, development and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 15, 634–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Coperchini, F.; Leporati, P.; Rotondi, M.; Chiovato, L. Expanding the therapeutic spectrum of metformin: From diabetes to cancer. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2015, 38, 1047–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Cunniff, B.; Newick, K.; Nelson, K.J.; Wozniak, A.N.; Beuschel, S.; Leavitt, B.; Bhave, A.; Butnor, K.; Koenig, A.; Chouchani, E.T.; et al. Disabling Mitochondrial Peroxide Metabolism via Combinatorial Targeting of Peroxiredoxin 3 as an Effective Therapeutic Approach for Malignant Mesothelioma. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0127310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Tan, A.S.; Baty, J.W.; Dong, L.F.; Bezawork-Geleta, A.; Endaya, B.; Goodwin, J.; Bajzikova, M.; Kovarova, J.; Peterka, M.; Yan, B.; et al. Mitochondrial genome acquisition restores respiratory function and tumorigenic potential of cancer cells without mitochondrial DNA. Cell Metab. 2015, 21, 81–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Warburg, O.; Wind, F.; Negelein, E. The Metabolism of Tumors in the Body. J. Gen. Physiol. 1927, 8, 519–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Warburg, O. On the origin of cancer cells. Science 1956, 123, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Bryant, J.L.; Meredith, S.L.; Williams, K.J.; White, A. Targeting hypoxia in the treatment of small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2014, 86, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Klameth, L.; Rath, B.; Hochmaier, M.; Moser, D.; Redl, M.; Mungenast, F.; Gelles, K.; Ulsperger, E.; Zeillinger, R.; Hamilton, G. Small cell lung cancer: Model of circulating tumor cell tumorospheres in chemoresistance. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 5337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Khalbuss, W.E.; Yang, H.; Lian, Q.; Elhosseiny, A.; Pantanowitz, L.; Monaco, S.E. The cytomorphologic spectrum of small-cell carcinoma and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma in body cavity effusions: A study of 68 cases. Cytojournal 2011, 8, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Jolly, M.K.; Boareto, M.; Debeb, B.G.; Aceto, N.; Farach-Carson, M.C.; Woodward, W.A.; Levine, H. Inflammatory breast cancer: A model for investigating cluster-based dissemination. NPJ Breast Cancer 2017, 3, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jcm 08 01038 g001 550
Figure 1. Lung CT images of a patient diagnosed with small cell lung carcinoma. (a) Pre- and post-CT images of the patent obtained before and after treatment. These images were loaded in Image J (Version 1.49), converted to 8 bit, and binarized; the background was set to white. The region of interest containing the tumor was defined manually. (b) Fractal dimension and lacunarity of primary small cell lung cancer (SCLC) tumors of three patients before and after treatment. The fractal dimension and lacunarity were calculated via the FracLac plugin (Box size was set from 0 pixels to 45% of image size, with 12 grid start positions using the grayscale differential scan). Significance was determined via t-test (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. Lung CT images of a patient diagnosed with small cell lung carcinoma. (a) Pre- and post-CT images of the patent obtained before and after treatment. These images were loaded in Image J (Version 1.49), converted to 8 bit, and binarized; the background was set to white. The region of interest containing the tumor was defined manually. (b) Fractal dimension and lacunarity of primary small cell lung cancer (SCLC) tumors of three patients before and after treatment. The fractal dimension and lacunarity were calculated via the FracLac plugin (Box size was set from 0 pixels to 45% of image size, with 12 grid start positions using the grayscale differential scan). Significance was determined via t-test (p < 0.05).
Jcm 08 01038 g001
Jcm 08 01038 g002 550
Figure 2. Immunohistochemistry images and fractal analysis of SCLC tissues. (a) Normal lung and SCLC tissue sections were processed for H&E and IHC staining with specific ab. (b) The fractal dimension of the stained normal (n = 6) and SCLC (n = 24) tissues was calculated using the FracLac plugin for ImageJ. Images were analyzed at 15×. Statistical significance was determined using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey post-test. (∗ equals p ≤ 0.05, ∗∗ equals p ≤ 0.01, ∗∗∗ equals p ≤ 0.005). (c) The lacunarity of the stained normal (n = 6) and SCLC (n = 24) tissues was calculated using the FracLac plugin for ImageJ. Images were analyzed at 15×. Statistical significance was determined using an ANOVA with Tukey post-test. (∗ equals p ≤ 0.05, ∗∗ equals p ≤ 0.01, ∗∗∗ equals p ≤ 0.005). (d) Six areas of two formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens (normal and SCLC) were individually analyzed and values of FD (DB) against lacunarity (Λ) were plotted for each region sampled. Images were analyzed at 40×.
Figure 2. Immunohistochemistry images and fractal analysis of SCLC tissues. (a) Normal lung and SCLC tissue sections were processed for H&E and IHC staining with specific ab. (b) The fractal dimension of the stained normal (n = 6) and SCLC (n = 24) tissues was calculated using the FracLac plugin for ImageJ. Images were analyzed at 15×. Statistical significance was determined using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey post-test. (∗ equals p ≤ 0.05, ∗∗ equals p ≤ 0.01, ∗∗∗ equals p ≤ 0.005). (c) The lacunarity of the stained normal (n = 6) and SCLC (n = 24) tissues was calculated using the FracLac plugin for ImageJ. Images were analyzed at 15×. Statistical significance was determined using an ANOVA with Tukey post-test. (∗ equals p ≤ 0.05, ∗∗ equals p ≤ 0.01, ∗∗∗ equals p ≤ 0.005). (d) Six areas of two formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens (normal and SCLC) were individually analyzed and values of FD (DB) against lacunarity (Λ) were plotted for each region sampled. Images were analyzed at 40×.
Jcm 08 01038 g002
Jcm 08 01038 g003 550
Figure 3. Mitochondrial protein expressions, immunofluorescence images, and fractal analysis of SCLC cell lines. (a) Representative immunoblots showing expression of mitochondrial proteins in a panel of SCLC cell lines. Protein loading was normalized by measurement of protein concentration. Three independent replicate experiments were performed. The full western blots are visualized in Supplementary Figure S1. (b) Mitochondrial morphology of H69 cells. Cells were treated for 4 h with 4 μM mdivi-1 (inhibitor of mitochondrial division dynamins), 4μM cisplatin, or equal volume of DMSO vehicle control. After fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde, cells were stained with TOM20. Two independent experiments were performed. In each case cells were selected at random for analysis. The number of cells in each experiment is indicated on panel (c). (c) Plot of individual values of FD (DB) against lacunarity (Λ) for each cell type.
Figure 3. Mitochondrial protein expressions, immunofluorescence images, and fractal analysis of SCLC cell lines. (a) Representative immunoblots showing expression of mitochondrial proteins in a panel of SCLC cell lines. Protein loading was normalized by measurement of protein concentration. Three independent replicate experiments were performed. The full western blots are visualized in Supplementary Figure S1. (b) Mitochondrial morphology of H69 cells. Cells were treated for 4 h with 4 μM mdivi-1 (inhibitor of mitochondrial division dynamins), 4μM cisplatin, or equal volume of DMSO vehicle control. After fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde, cells were stained with TOM20. Two independent experiments were performed. In each case cells were selected at random for analysis. The number of cells in each experiment is indicated on panel (c). (c) Plot of individual values of FD (DB) against lacunarity (Λ) for each cell type.
Jcm 08 01038 g003
Jcm 08 01038 g004 550
Figure 4. Mitochondrial oxidative and glycolytic activity in SCLC cell lines. Spare respiratory capacity indicates how close a cell operates to its bioenergetic limit. The mitochondrial stress test was used to obtain the bioenergetic parameters. (a) An example of one mitochondrial stress assay, arrows indicate the addition of 0.5 μM oligomycin A (oligo), 0.5 μM FCCP, and 1 μM rotenone. (b) Oxygen consumption rate (OCR), an indicator of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation. Basal mitochondrial OCRs in SCLC cells were significantly different compared to BEAS-2B OCR. (c) Extracellular acidification rate (ECAR), an indicator of glycolytic activity measured over time using Seahorse extracellular flux analyzer. Basal mitochondrial OCR in SCLC cells were significantly different compare to BEAS-2B. (d). Three SCLC cell lines (H82, H526, and SBC3) had significantly higher spare respiratory capacities compared to control BEAS-2B cells. Other SCLC cells lines had slightly increased capacities (H69, SBC5, DMS273) which were not significant, while DMS114 had a slightly decreased capacity. Results were analyzed via ANOVA with Tukey post-test (p < 0.001 ***, p < 0.01 **). Spare respiratory capacity was calculated using the mitochondrial stress test on the Seahorse Biosciences XF Analyzer as FCCP response/basal respiration. (e) Coupling efficiency of SCLC cell lines. SCLC cells lines demonstrated increased mitochondrial efficiency coupling respiration to ATP production. Results were analyzed via ANOVA with Tukey post-test (p < 0.001 ***, p < 0.01 **). Three independent replicate experiments were performed in quadruplicate for each experiment.
Figure 4. Mitochondrial oxidative and glycolytic activity in SCLC cell lines. Spare respiratory capacity indicates how close a cell operates to its bioenergetic limit. The mitochondrial stress test was used to obtain the bioenergetic parameters. (a) An example of one mitochondrial stress assay, arrows indicate the addition of 0.5 μM oligomycin A (oligo), 0.5 μM FCCP, and 1 μM rotenone. (b) Oxygen consumption rate (OCR), an indicator of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation. Basal mitochondrial OCRs in SCLC cells were significantly different compared to BEAS-2B OCR. (c) Extracellular acidification rate (ECAR), an indicator of glycolytic activity measured over time using Seahorse extracellular flux analyzer. Basal mitochondrial OCR in SCLC cells were significantly different compare to BEAS-2B. (d). Three SCLC cell lines (H82, H526, and SBC3) had significantly higher spare respiratory capacities compared to control BEAS-2B cells. Other SCLC cells lines had slightly increased capacities (H69, SBC5, DMS273) which were not significant, while DMS114 had a slightly decreased capacity. Results were analyzed via ANOVA with Tukey post-test (p < 0.001 ***, p < 0.01 **). Spare respiratory capacity was calculated using the mitochondrial stress test on the Seahorse Biosciences XF Analyzer as FCCP response/basal respiration. (e) Coupling efficiency of SCLC cell lines. SCLC cells lines demonstrated increased mitochondrial efficiency coupling respiration to ATP production. Results were analyzed via ANOVA with Tukey post-test (p < 0.001 ***, p < 0.01 **). Three independent replicate experiments were performed in quadruplicate for each experiment.
Jcm 08 01038 g004
Jcm 08 01038 g005 550
Figure 5. Bioenergetic profile of small cell lung cancer cell lines. Panel shows the ratios of OCR to ECAR in SCLC cells lines. A lower ratio indicates cells are more dependent on glycolysis compared to oxidative phosphorylation. Results are shown as the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments and were analyzed via ANOVA with Tukey’s post-test (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.005, *** p < 0.0001).
Figure 5. Bioenergetic profile of small cell lung cancer cell lines. Panel shows the ratios of OCR to ECAR in SCLC cells lines. A lower ratio indicates cells are more dependent on glycolysis compared to oxidative phosphorylation. Results are shown as the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments and were analyzed via ANOVA with Tukey’s post-test (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.005, *** p < 0.0001).
Jcm 08 01038 g005
Jcm 08 01038 g006 550
Figure 6. Cytotoxicity of SCLC cell lines to mdivi-1 and cisplatin. SCLC and control cells in 1% serum media were treated with increasing concentrations of (a) mdivi-1 and (b) cisplatin as indicated for 72 h, and cell viability was then assessed via calcein-AM uptake, as described. The results were normalized as a percentage of the DMSO treated controls and analyzed via a sigmoidal dose response curve using Prism software (version 5.0) to calculate the EC50 value for each drug. Three independent replicate experiments were performed for each experiment.
Figure 6. Cytotoxicity of SCLC cell lines to mdivi-1 and cisplatin. SCLC and control cells in 1% serum media were treated with increasing concentrations of (a) mdivi-1 and (b) cisplatin as indicated for 72 h, and cell viability was then assessed via calcein-AM uptake, as described. The results were normalized as a percentage of the DMSO treated controls and analyzed via a sigmoidal dose response curve using Prism software (version 5.0) to calculate the EC50 value for each drug. Three independent replicate experiments were performed for each experiment.
Jcm 08 01038 g006
Table
Table 1. EC50 value for various SCLC cell lines.
Table 1. EC50 value for various SCLC cell lines.
Drug EC50Beas-2B (Control)H69H82H446H526SBC3SBC5DMS114DMS273
mdivi-1 μM36.913.012.8893.3562.7385.76318.834.73521.07
Cisplatin μM10.3713.764.21810.373.3571.94010.765.62611.44

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mambetsariev, I.; Mirzapoiazova, T.; Lennon, F.; Jolly, M.K.; Li, H.; Nasser, M.W.; Vora, L.; Kulkarni, P.; Batra, S.K.; Salgia, R. Small Cell Lung Cancer Therapeutic Responses Through Fractal Measurements: From Radiology to Mitochondrial Biology. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 1038. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8071038

AMA Style

Mambetsariev I, Mirzapoiazova T, Lennon F, Jolly MK, Li H, Nasser MW, Vora L, Kulkarni P, Batra SK, Salgia R. Small Cell Lung Cancer Therapeutic Responses Through Fractal Measurements: From Radiology to Mitochondrial Biology. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2019; 8(7):1038. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8071038

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mambetsariev, Isa, Tamara Mirzapoiazova, Frances Lennon, Mohit Kumar Jolly, Haiqing Li, Mohd W. Nasser, Lalit Vora, Prakash Kulkarni, Surinder K. Batra, and Ravi Salgia. 2019. "Small Cell Lung Cancer Therapeutic Responses Through Fractal Measurements: From Radiology to Mitochondrial Biology" Journal of Clinical Medicine 8, no. 7: 1038. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8071038

APA Style

Mambetsariev, I., Mirzapoiazova, T., Lennon, F., Jolly, M. K., Li, H., Nasser, M. W., Vora, L., Kulkarni, P., Batra, S. K., & Salgia, R. (2019). Small Cell Lung Cancer Therapeutic Responses Through Fractal Measurements: From Radiology to Mitochondrial Biology. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 8(7), 1038. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8071038

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop