# Why Current Statistics of Complementary Alternative Medicine Clinical Trials is Invalid

^{1}

^{2}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Methods

^{2}), where “exp” is the base of natural logarithms and “z” is the deviation in standard errors from the null effect [6].

## 3. Results

## 4. Discussion and Conclusions

## Author Contributions

## Conflicts of Interest

## References

- Jaynes, E.T. Probability Theory: The Logic of Science; Bretthorst, G.L., Ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Goodman, S.N. Toward evidence-based medical statistics. 1: The p value fallacy. Ann. Intern. Med.
**1999**, 130, 995–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Pandolfi, M.; Carreras, G. The faulty statistics of complementary alternative medicine (CAM). Eur. J. Intern. Med.
**2014**, 25, 607–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Randomastronomy. Higgs Boson “Discovery” and How to NOT Interpret p-Values. Available online: https://randomastronomy.wordpress.com/2012/07/04/ (accessed on 16 February 2018).
- Gorski, D.H.; Novella, S. Clinical trials of integrative medicine: Testing whether magic works? Trends Mol. Med.
**2014**, 20, 473–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Goodman, S.N. Towards evidence-based medical statistics. 2: The Bayes factor. Ann. Intern. Med.
**1999**, 130, 1005–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Jeffreys, H. Theory of Probability; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1961. [Google Scholar]
- Rouder, J.N.; Speckman, P.L.; Sun, D.; Morey, R.D.; Iverson, G. Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychon. Bull. Rev.
**2009**, 16, 225–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Perception and Cognition Lab, Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri. Bayes Factor Calculators. Available online: http://pcl.missouri.edu/bayesfactor (accessed on 16 February 2018).
- Gerstman, B.B. Epidemiology Kept Simple: An Introduction to Traditional and Modern Epidemiology, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Oxford, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Neri, I.; Airola, G.; Contu, G.; Allais, G.; Facchinetti, F.; Benedetto, C. Acupuncture plus moxibustion to resolve breech presentation: A randomized controlled study. J. Matern Fetal Neonatal Med.
**2004**, 15, 247–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Melchart, D.; Streng, A.; Hoppe, A.; Brinkhaus, B.; Witt, C.; Wagenpfeil, S.; Pfaffenrath, V.; Hammes, M.; Hummelsberger, J.; Irnich, D.; et al. Acupuncture for tension-type headache: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ
**2005**, 331, 376–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Ernst, E. Acupuncture = Placebo? Available online: http://edzardernst.com/2013/02/acupuncture-placebo/ (accessed on 16 February 2018).
- Bem, D.J. Feeling the future: Experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.
**2011**, 100, 407–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Wagenmakers, E.J.; Wetzels, R.; Borsboom, M.; van der Maas, H.L. Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: The case of psi. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.
**2011**, 100, 426–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] - Ernst, E.; Smith, K. Moral Harm than Good? The Moral Maze of Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 1st ed.; Springer: Basel, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA
**2013**, 310, 2191–2194. [Google Scholar]

Bayes Factor | Strength of Evidence |
---|---|

>100 | Extreme evidence for H0 |

30–100 | Very strong evidence for H0 |

10–30 | Strong evidence for H0 |

3–10 | Substantial evidence for H0 |

1–3 | Anecdotal evidence for H0 |

1 | No evidence |

1/3–1 | Anecdotal evidence for Ha |

1/10–1/3 | Substantial evidence for Ha |

1/30–1/10 | Strong evidence for Ha |

1/100–1/30 | Very strong evidence for Ha |

<1/100 | Extreme evidence for Ha |

© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Pandolfi, M.; Carreras, G. Why Current Statistics of Complementary Alternative Medicine Clinical Trials is Invalid. *J. Clin. Med.* **2018**, *7*, 138.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7060138

**AMA Style**

Pandolfi M, Carreras G. Why Current Statistics of Complementary Alternative Medicine Clinical Trials is Invalid. *Journal of Clinical Medicine*. 2018; 7(6):138.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7060138

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Pandolfi, Maurizio, and Giulia Carreras. 2018. "Why Current Statistics of Complementary Alternative Medicine Clinical Trials is Invalid" *Journal of Clinical Medicine* 7, no. 6: 138.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7060138