Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Intensity of Sleep Bruxism in Arterial Hypertension
Next Article in Special Issue
Predictors of Exercise Capacity in Patients with Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of Statin Added to Systemic Anticancer Therapy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Controlled Trials
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cardiac Rehabilitation Models around the Globe

Impact of Rehabilitation on Outcomes after TAVI: A Preliminary Study

Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Brandenburg, Bernau 16321, Germany
Brandenburg Medical School (MHB) “Theodor Fontane”, Neuruppin 16816, Germany
Institute for Pharmacology and Preventive Medicine, Cloppenburg 49661, Germany
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
J. Clin. Med. 2018, 7(10), 326;
Received: 16 August 2018 / Revised: 21 September 2018 / Accepted: 2 October 2018 / Published: 5 October 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cardiac Rehabilitation)
The benefit of rehabilitation in elderly patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for treatment of severe aortic stenosis is unknown. The impact of declining rehabilitation programs on mortality has also not been described. In a longitudinal cohort study of 1056 patients undergoing elective TAVI between 2008 and 2016, logistic regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between treatment modality and outcome according to whether or not patients participated in a three-week rehabilitation program after TAVI. Subgroup analyses included patient outcome separated according to cardiac, geriatric, or no rehabilitation. A total of 1017 patients survived until hospital discharge (96.3%) and were offered rehabilitation, 366 patients (36.0%) declined to undergo rehabilitation, with the remaining patients undergoing either cardiac (n = 435; 42.8%) or geriatric rehabilitation (n = 216; 21.2%). Mortality at six months was lower for patients receiving rehabilitation compared with those who had not (adjusted odds ratio (OR): 0.49; 95% confidence interval (confidence interval [CI]: 0.25–0.94; p = 0.032). Sub-analysis showed the benefit of cardiac (adjusted OR: 0.31; 95% CI 0.14–0.71, p = 0.006), but not geriatric rehabilitation (adjusted OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.37–1.85, p = 0.65). A program of rehabilitation after TAVI has the potential to reduce mortality. Future studies should focus on health-orientated behavior and identifying risk factors for declining rehabilitation programs. View Full-Text
Keywords: cardiac rehabilitation; TAVI; mortality; aortic stenosis; heart valve cardiac rehabilitation; TAVI; mortality; aortic stenosis; heart valve
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Butter, C.; Groß, J.; Haase-Fielitz, A.; Sims, H.; Deutsch, C.; Bramlage, P.; Neuss, M. Impact of Rehabilitation on Outcomes after TAVI: A Preliminary Study. J. Clin. Med. 2018, 7, 326.

AMA Style

Butter C, Groß J, Haase-Fielitz A, Sims H, Deutsch C, Bramlage P, Neuss M. Impact of Rehabilitation on Outcomes after TAVI: A Preliminary Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2018; 7(10):326.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Butter, Christian, Jessica Groß, Anja Haase-Fielitz, Helen Sims, Cornelia Deutsch, Peter Bramlage, and Michael Neuss. 2018. "Impact of Rehabilitation on Outcomes after TAVI: A Preliminary Study" Journal of Clinical Medicine 7, no. 10: 326.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop