Next Article in Journal
Segmental Colitis Associated with Diverticulosis: Status Quo
Previous Article in Journal
Long-Term Auditory, Tinnitus, and Psychological Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation in Single-Sided Deafness: A Two-Year Prospective Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Impact of Seasonal, Environmental, and Inflammatory Factors on Chronic Urticaria Activity and Serum Biomarkers: A Prospective Cohort Study

by
Gulistan Alpagat
*,
Ayşe Fusun Kalpaklioglu
and
Ayse Baccioglu
Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergic Diseases, Medical Faculty, Kirikkale University, Kirikkale 71450, Türkiye
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(2), 645; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15020645
Submission received: 2 December 2025 / Revised: 20 December 2025 / Accepted: 12 January 2026 / Published: 13 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Immunology & Rheumatology)

Abstract

Background: Chronic urticaria (CU) is characterized by recurrent wheals and/or angioedema persisting for more than six weeks. While disease triggers are often unidentified, seasonal and environmental factors may modulate disease activity; however, evidence regarding their clinical impact remains limited. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of seasonal, meteorological, and pollutant-specific environmental factors on urticaria control using the Urticaria Control Test (UCT), and to compare these effects between chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and chronic inducible urticaria (CIU) in relation to inflammatory serum biomarkers. Materials and Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted at the Allergy and Clinical Immunology outpatient clinic of Kirikkale University Faculty of Medicine between June 2022 and April 2023. Patients with CU were classified as CSU or CIU according to international guidelines. Each participant was evaluated during summer and winter seasons. Area-level air pollution data and meteorological parameters were obtained from national monitoring systems. Disease control was assessed using the UCT, and inflammatory biomarkers were analyzed. Results: Urticaria control showed significant seasonal variation, with lower UCT scores during summer and higher scores during winter in both CSU and CIU patients. Among environmental factors, ozone (O3) was the only pollutant consistently associated with poorer urticaria control, whereas particulate matter and traffic-related pollutants, despite being higher in winter, showed no clinically relevant association. Summer months were characterized by increased inflammatory activity, including elevated leukocyte counts, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and D-dimer levels, particularly in CSU patients. D-dimer emerged as an independent marker associated with poor disease control during summer. Conclusions: CU demonstrates marked seasonal variation, with disease worsening during summer months. Pollutant-specific effects, particularly O3 exposure, rather than overall air pollution burden, appear to be clinically relevant in urticaria control. Inflammatory and coagulation-related biomarkers may provide additional insight into disease activity. These findings support a season-aware and individualized management approach and highlight the need for future studies incorporating individual-level exposure assessment and biomarker-guided strategies.

1. Introduction

Urticaria is characterized by recurrent wheals, angioedema, or both, and is classified as acute or chronic according to symptom duration. Acute urticaria (AU) lasts less than six weeks, whereas chronic urticaria (CU) persists for six weeks or longer [1]. According to the EAACI/GA2LEN/EuroGuiDerm/APAAACI guideline, CU is further divided into chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and chronic inducible urticaria (CIU), reflecting differences in triggering factors and underlying pathophysiology [2].
Although genetic and immunological mechanisms, including mast cell activation, play a central role in CU, external factors such as air pollution and weather conditions may modulate disease activity and symptom severity [3,4]. Environmental stressors can influence systemic inflammation and coagulation pathways, potentially contributing to fluctuations in urticaria control.
Air pollution consists of gaseous pollutants and particulate matter capable of inducing oxidative stress and inflammatory responses in exposed tissues [5]. Despite continuous skin exposure to these environmental factors, their clinical impact on CU control and potential differential effects on CSU and CIU remain insufficiently defined.
Few studies have simultaneously evaluated seasonal variations, environmental conditions, and inflammatory biomarkers in relation to CU activity [3,4]. Therefore, this prospective study aimed to investigate the effects of air pollution and meteorological factors on urticaria control, assessed using the urticaria control test (UCT), and to explore differences between CSU and CIU in relation to UCT scores and selected serum biomarkers.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethical Approval

All procedures involving human participants were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Kirikkale University Ethics Committee for Clinical Research (Approval Date: 29 September 2022; Decision No. 08/03). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to enrollment.

2.2. Study Populations

This study was conducted as a prospective, observational, single-center study at the Allergy and Clinical Immunology Outpatient Clinic of Kirikkale University Faculty of Medicine with patient recruitment from 1 June 2023 to 1 April 2024. CU was defined as the presence of recurrent wheals, angioedema, or both persisting for at least six weeks. Patients with CU were classified as having CSU or CIU in accordance with the EAACI/GA2LEN/EuroGuiDerm/APAAACI international guideline. Classification was based on a detailed medical history, physical examination, and assessment of reproducible triggering factors. CSU was diagnosed in patients with recurrent wheals and/or angioedema occurring without an identifiable external trigger, whereas CIU was diagnosed when symptoms were consistently provoked by specific physical or environmental stimuli (e.g., pressure, cold, heat, or exercise). Participants were consecutively recruited from the Allergy and Clinical Immunology outpatient clinic during the study period. As this was a prospective observational study, no randomization or intervention was performed.

2.3. The Inclusion Criteria

(i) Diagnosed with CU by an allergy specialist; (ii) Aged >18 years, male or female; (iii) Provided informed consent to participate in the study; (iv) Residing in Kirikkale; (v) Receiving antihistamine treatment.

2.4. The Exclusion Criteria

(i) Declining to participate in the study; (ii) Residing outside Kırıkkale; (iii) Receiving biological therapy.

2.5. Urticaria Control Test (UCT)

The UCT is a validated patient-reported outcome measure consisting of four questions evaluating symptom severity, quality of life impairment, adequacy of treatment, and overall disease control during the preceding four weeks. Each item is scored from 0 to 4, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 16. Urticaria control was defined as poor for scores < 12 and well controlled for scores ≥ 12 [6,7].

2.6. Environmental and Meteorological Data

Daily air pollution data, including particulate matter ≤ 10 µm (PM10), particulate matter ≤ 2.5 µm (PM2.5), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), carbon monoxide (CO), and ozone (O3), were obtained from the Turkish Ministry of Environment and Urbanization monitoring network. Meteorological parameters, including temperature, relative humidity, rainfall, wind speed, and atmospheric pressure, were retrieved from the Turkish State Meteorological Service.
Seasonal mean values were calculated for summer and winter periods. Air pollutants were analyzed individually to allow pollutant-specific evaluation of their associations with urticaria control.

2.7. Laboratory Measurements

Blood samples were collected during scheduled visits and analyzed using standard laboratory methods at the central laboratory of Kırıkkale University Hospital. Laboratory assessments included complete blood count, C-reactive protein (CRP), and D-dimer levels.

2.8. Sample Size and Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 21.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Continuous variables were tested for normality and compared using Student’s t-test or the Mann–Whitney U test, as appropriate. Categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square test. Associations between continuous variables were evaluated using Pearson’s correlation coefficient.
Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors independently associated with poor urticaria control, and results are presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The UCT score was predefined as the primary outcome measure. As the analyses were hypothesis-driven and focused on predefined outcomes, no formal adjustment for multiple comparisons was applied; this approach has been explicitly stated to ensure transparency. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

A total of 161 patients with CU were included in the study, including 83 patients with CSU and 78 patients with CIU. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population are presented in Table 1. Patients with CSU were significantly older and had a higher body mass index (BMI) than CIU patients, while sex distribution was similar between groups.
Seasonal meteorological conditions and air pollution parameters are summarized in Table 2. Summer was characterized by higher temperatures and lower humidity, whereas winter was colder and more humid. Concentrations of particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5), NO2, SO2, and CO were higher during winter months. In contrast, O3 concentrations were higher during summer.
Seasonal comparisons of disease activity and key inflammatory markers are shown in Table 3. Both CSU and CIU patients demonstrated significantly poorer urticaria control during summer, reflected by lower UCT scores and a higher proportion of uncontrolled disease. Elevated D-dimer and CRP levels during summer were more pronounced in CSU patients.
Multivariate regression analysis identified D-dimer as the only independent factor significantly associated with poor urticaria control during summer (Table 4). No clinical, laboratory, or environmental parameters were independently associated with urticaria control during winter.

4. Discussion

The present study evaluated the impact of seasonal, meteorological, and environmental factors on disease control in CU, with a specific focus on pollutant-specific effects rather than overall air pollution burden. The principal finding of this prospective study is that CU exhibits clear seasonal variability, with significantly poorer disease control during the summer months. Importantly, O3 was identified as the only environmental pollutant consistently associated with worsening urticaria control, whereas other pollutants showed no clinically relevant effect.
Seasonal differences in disease activity were observed in both CSU and CIU, as reflected by lower UCT scores and a higher proportion of uncontrolled disease during summer. These findings are consistent with previous studies reporting increased urticaria-related symptoms and healthcare utilization during warmer periods [8,9,10,11,12]. Notably, despite higher concentrations of particulate matter and traffic-related gaseous pollutants during winter, disease control was better in this season, highlighting that the presence of air pollutants alone does not necessarily translate into clinical deterioration.
Among the evaluated environmental parameters, O3 emerged as the most relevant pollutant influencing urticaria activity. O3 concentrations were higher during summer and showed a negative association with urticaria control, whereas PM10, PM2.5, NO2, SO2, and CO predominated in winter when disease control was improved. O3 is a potent oxidant capable of disrupting the skin barrier, inducing oxidative stress, and activating pro-inflammatory signaling pathways in the skin [11]. These processes may enhance mast cell activation and amplify inflammatory responses, thereby facilitating wheal formation and symptom exacerbation. Our findings support the concept that pollutant-specific biological effects, rather than cumulative pollution exposure, are of greater clinical relevance in CU.
In addition to environmental influences, inflammatory and coagulation-related biomarkers demonstrated marked seasonal variation, particularly in CSU patients. During summer, CSU patients exhibited higher D-dimer and CRP levels, leukocytosis, neutrophilia, and elevated NLR, suggesting a more pronounced systemic inflammatory and pro-coagulant state compared with CIU patients, who showed relatively higher eosinophil counts. These subtype-specific inflammatory profiles are consistent with previous reports emphasizing heterogeneity in the immunopathogenesis of CSU and CIU [2,13,14,15].
Notably, D-dimer was identified as the only independent predictor of poor urticaria control during summer in multivariate regression analysis. This finding is in line with accumulating evidence linking activation of the coagulation cascade to CSU disease activity [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Coagulation pathway activation may promote thrombin generation, leading to increased endothelial permeability and mast cell activation, key mechanisms underlying wheal formation. As a fibrin degradation product, D-dimer may reflect ongoing endothelial activation and vascular leakage, both of which are central features of urticaria pathophysiology. The absence of significant predictors during winter further supports the notion that environmental and inflammatory triggers exert their greatest influence during warmer months.
From a clinical and translational perspective, these findings suggest that D-dimer may serve as a useful biomarker of disease activity, particularly in patients with poor control during periods of increased environmental stress. Although causality cannot be established due to the observational nature of the study, our results provide a rationale for future biomarker-driven research and raise the possibility that targeting coagulation–inflammation interactions could contribute to more personalized management strategies in selected CU patients.
The strengths of this study include its prospective design, seasonal evaluation, use of a validated disease control instrument (UCT), and integration of environmental and laboratory data. However, several limitations should be acknowledged. The study was conducted at a single center with a relatively limited sample size, environmental exposure was assessed at a regional rather than individual level, and causal relationships cannot be inferred. Furthermore, only summer and winter seasons were evaluated, and transitional seasonal periods were not assessed.
This study demonstrates that CU exhibits clear seasonal variation, with poorer disease control during summer months. O3 emerged as the environmental factor most closely associated with symptom exacerbation, whereas particulate matter and other traffic-related pollutants showed no clinically relevant effect. In addition, D-dimer was identified as a biomarker associated with poor urticaria control during periods of increased environmental stress, suggesting potential value in clinical monitoring. Elevated inflammatory markers, including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and CRP, were also observed during periods of poorer disease control, indicating enhanced systemic inflammation. These findings support a pollutant-specific and season-aware approach to CU management and highlight the need for future studies incorporating individual-level exposure assessment and biomarker-guided strategies to advance personalized care in this patient population.

Author Contributions

G.A., A.B. and A.F.K. performed the literature search, database setup up and contributed to the writing of the manuscript. G.A., A.B. and A.F.K. reviewed the manuscript. G.A., A.B. and A.F.K. contributed to the study design. G.A., A.B. and A.F.K. reviewed the manuscript. G.A., A.B. and A.F.K. contributed to the study design, the writing of the manuscript, and reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by Kirikkale University, Ethics Committee for Clinical Research (Approval Date: 29 September 2022; Decision No. 08/03).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data that supports the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data is not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Maurer, M.; Zuberbier, T.; Metz, M. The Classification, Pathogenesis, Diagnostic Workup, and Management of Urticaria: An Update. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 2022, 268, 117–133. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Zuberbier, T.; Latiff, A.H.A.; Abuzakouk, M.; Aquilina, S.; Asero, R.; Baker, D.; Ballmer-Weber, B.; Bangert, C.; Ben-Shoshan, M.; Bernstein, J.A.; et al. The international EAACI/GA2LEN/EuroGuiDerm/APAAACI guideline for the definition, classification, diagnosis, and management of urticaria. Allergy 2022, 77, 734–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Vogli, M.; Peters, A.; Wolf, K.; Thorand, B.; Herder, C.; Koenig, W.; Cyrys, J.; Maestri, E.; Marmiroli, N.; Karrasch, S.; et al. Long-term exposure to ambient air pollution and inflammatory response in the KORA study. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 912, 169416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Pilz, V.; Wolf, K.; Breitner, S.; Rückerl, R.; Koenig, W.; Rathmann, W.; Cyrys, J.; Peters, A.; Schneider, A. C-reactive protein (CRP) and long-term air pollution with a focus on ultrafine particles. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2018, 221, 510–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bălă, G.P.; Râjnoveanu, R.M.; Tudorache, E.; Motișan, R.; Oancea, C. Air pollution exposure-the (in)visible risk factor for respiratory diseases. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2021, 28, 19615–19628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Weller, K.; Groffik, A.; Church, M.K.; Hawro, T.; Krause, K.; Metz, M.; Martus, P.; Casale, T.B.; Staubach, P.; Maurer, M. Development and validation of the Urticaria Control Test: A patient-reported outcome instrument for assessing urticaria control. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2014, 133, 1365–1372.e13726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kocatürk, E.; Kızıltaç, U.; Can, P.; Kara, R.Ö.; Erdem, T.; Kızıltaç, K.; Sahillioğlu, N.; Gelincik, A.; Maurer, M.; Weller, K. Validation of the Turkish version of the Urticaria Control Test: Correlation with other tools and comparison between spontaneous and inducible chronic urticaria. World Allergy Organ. J. 2019, 12, 100009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Choo, K.J.L.; Ho, A.F.W.; Gui, H.; Tay, P.J.M.; Lee, H.Y.; Koh, M.S.; Earnest, A.; Pek, P.P.; Liu, N.; Chong, S.; et al. Relationship between local weather, air pollution and hospital attendances for urticaria in children: Time stratified analysis of 12,002 cases. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2022, 52, 180–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, W.; Zhang, W.; Zhao, J.; Li, H.; Wu, J.; Deng, F.; Ma, Q.; Guo, X. Short-Term Exposure to Ambient Air Pollution and Increased Emergency Room Visits for Skin Diseases in Beijing, China. Toxics 2021, 9, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kousha, T.; Valacchi, G. The air quality health index and emergency department visits for urticaria in Windsor, Canada. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A. 2015, 78, 524–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Petracca, B.; Rothen-Rutishauser, B.; Valacchi, G.; Eeman, M. Bench approaches to study the detrimental cutaneous impact of tropospheric ozone. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2021, 31, 137–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wang, H.; Matusik, M.; Wunderlich, R.; Hanson, S.E.; Babich, K.; Samad, L.; Qian, A.M.; McMillin, S.E.; Ye, X.; Zhang, S.; et al. Short-Term Ambient Air Pollution and Urticaria in Guangzhou, China: Estimating the Association and Population Attributable Fraction. Toxics 2023, 11, 949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Khan, S.; Avison, R. Routine Testing not Beneficial in Evaluation of Patients with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria. Indian Dermatol. Online J. 2020, 11, 1016–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kumaran, M.S.; Singh, S.; Mehta, H.; Parsad, D. Decoding the variability in clinical and laboratory profiles of Chronic Inducible Urticaria vs. Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria—A retrospective study from a tertiary care center. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 2024, 316, 703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Konstantinou, G.N.; Podder, I.; Dhabal, A. Is there a role of genetics in acute and chronic urticaria-A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Transl. Allergy 2025, 15, e70072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Criado, P.R.; Antinori, L.C.; Maruta, C.W.; Reis, V.M. Evaluation of D-dimer serum levels among patients with chronic urticaria, psoriasis and urticarial vasculitis. An. Bras. Dermatol. 2013, 88, 355–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Khursheed, U.; Shah, S.; Aslam, A.; Sultan, J.; Younus, F.; Rather, S. D-dimer levels in patients with chronic urticaria: A case–control study on a Kashmiri population. Our Dermatol. Online 2022, 13, 365–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Triwongwaranat, D.; Kulthanan, K.; Chularojanamontri, L.; Pinkaew, S. Correlation between plasma D-dimer levels and the severity of patients with chronic urticaria. Asia Pac. Allergy 2013, 3, 100–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rabelo-Filardia, R.; Daltro-Oliveiraa, R.; Campos, R.A. Parameters associated with chronic spontaneous urticaria duration and severity: A systematic review. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 2013, 161, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kolkhir, P.; Borzova, E.; Grattan, C.; Asero, R.; Pogorelov, D.; Maurer, M. Autoimmune comorbidity in chronic spontaneous urticaria: A systematic review. Autoimmun. Rev. 2017, 16, 1196–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yanase, Y.; Takahagi, S.; Hide, M. Chronic spontaneous urticaria and the extrinsic coagulation system. Allergol. Int. 2018, 67, 191–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ghazanfar, M.N.; Thomsen, S.F. D-dimer as a potential blood biomarker for disease activity and treatment response in chronic urticaria: A focused review. Eur. J. Dermatol. 2018, 28, 731–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nguyen, H.T.; Vu, T.T.P. Plasma D-dimer level in Vietnamese patients with chronic urticaria. Indian J. Dermatol. 2021, 66, 496–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Demographic of patients with chronic urticaria.
Table 1. Demographic of patients with chronic urticaria.
ParameterCSU (n = 83)CIU (n = 78)p Value
Age (years)42.0 ± 16.533.9 ± 12.60.001
Female sex, n (%)60 (72%)54 (69%)0.67
Body mass index (BMI) (kg/m2)28.3 ± 5.925.8 ± 5.40.007
CSU, Chronic spontaneous urticaria; CIU, Chronic inducible urticaria.
Table 2. Seasonal meteorological conditions and air pollutant concentrations.
Table 2. Seasonal meteorological conditions and air pollutant concentrations.
ParameterSummer (Mean)Winter (Mean)
Temperature (°C)24.26.3
Relative humidity (%)43.669.7
Atmospheric pressure (hPa)925.8931.6
PM10 (µg/m3)40.447.1
PM2.5 (µg/m3)5.120.7
NO2 (µg/m3)22.537.1
SO2 (µg/m3)19.529.7
CO (µg/m3)343.7760.5
O3 (µg/m3)4.952.52
Table 3. Seasonal comparison of urticaria control and key inflammatory markers.
Table 3. Seasonal comparison of urticaria control and key inflammatory markers.
ParameterCSU—SummerCSU—WinterCIU—SummerCIU—Winter
UCT score9.33 ± 2.9311.64 ± 4.009.66 ± 3.1711.47 ± 3.73
Uncontrolled urticaria (UCT < 12), %77.523.574.328.8
D-dimer > 500 ng/mL, %57.325.539.721.7
CRP > 5 mg/L, %31.728.214.119.6
NLR2.78 ± 0.332.13 ± 0.892.46 ± 1.612.26 ± 1.13
Table 4. Multivariate regression analysis of factors associated with urticaria control during summer.
Table 4. Multivariate regression analysis of factors associated with urticaria control during summer.
VariableOdds Ratio95% CIp Value
D-dimer (mg/L)1.0011.000–1.0030.040
Age (Years)0.990.95–1.040.67
Sex (Female)0.150.02–1.070.058
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alpagat, G.; Kalpaklioglu, A.F.; Baccioglu, A. Impact of Seasonal, Environmental, and Inflammatory Factors on Chronic Urticaria Activity and Serum Biomarkers: A Prospective Cohort Study. J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15, 645. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15020645

AMA Style

Alpagat G, Kalpaklioglu AF, Baccioglu A. Impact of Seasonal, Environmental, and Inflammatory Factors on Chronic Urticaria Activity and Serum Biomarkers: A Prospective Cohort Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2026; 15(2):645. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15020645

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alpagat, Gulistan, Ayşe Fusun Kalpaklioglu, and Ayse Baccioglu. 2026. "Impact of Seasonal, Environmental, and Inflammatory Factors on Chronic Urticaria Activity and Serum Biomarkers: A Prospective Cohort Study" Journal of Clinical Medicine 15, no. 2: 645. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15020645

APA Style

Alpagat, G., Kalpaklioglu, A. F., & Baccioglu, A. (2026). Impact of Seasonal, Environmental, and Inflammatory Factors on Chronic Urticaria Activity and Serum Biomarkers: A Prospective Cohort Study. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 15(2), 645. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15020645

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop