Next Article in Journal
Impact of Frailty on Surgical Outcomes in Nonacute Subdural Hematomas: A Nationwide Analysis of 251,597 Patients over 20 Years
Previous Article in Journal
Post-Marketing Safety of Spinal Muscular Atrophy Therapies: Analysis of Spontaneous Adverse Drug Reactions from EudraVigilance
Previous Article in Special Issue
Neutrophil Percentage-to-Albumin Ratio as a Prognostic Marker in Pneumonia Patients Aged 80 and Above in Intensive Care
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 14
Issue 9
10.3390/jcm14093175
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Role of Respiratory Viruses in Severe Acute Respiratory Failure

by
David Mokrani
1 and
Jean-François Timsit
1,2,*
1
Infectious and Intensive Care Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bichat-Claude Bernard, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75018 Paris, France
2
Infection Antimicrobials Modelling Evolution (IAME), Mixt Research Unit (UMR) 1137, INSERM, Université Paris-Cité, 75018 Paris, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(9), 3175; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14093175
Submission received: 26 March 2025 / Revised: 25 April 2025 / Accepted: 1 May 2025 / Published: 3 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Update on Acute Severe Respiratory Infections)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

Respiratory viruses are widespread in the community, affecting both the upper and lower respiratory tract. This review provides an updated synthesis of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical impact, and management of severe respiratory viral infections in critically ill patients, with a focus on immunocompetent adults. The clinical presentation is typically nonspecific, making etiological diagnosis challenging. This limitation has been mitigated by the advent of molecular diagnostics—particularly multiplex PCR (mPCR)—which has not only improved pathogen identification at the bedside but also significantly reshaped our understanding of the epidemiology of respiratory viral infections. Routine mPCR testing has revealed that respiratory viruses are implicated in 30–40% of community-acquired pneumonia hospitalizations and are a frequent trigger of acute decompensations in patients with chronic comorbidities. While some viruses follow seasonal patterns, others circulate year-round. Influenza viruses and Pneumoviridae, including respiratory syncytial virus and human metapneumovirus, remain the principal viral pathogens associated with severe outcomes, particularly acute respiratory failure and mortality. Bacterial co-infections are also common and substantially increase both morbidity and mortality. Despite the growing contribution of respiratory viruses to the burden of critical illness, effective antiviral therapies remain limited. Neuraminidase inhibitors remain the cornerstone of treatment for severe influenza, whereas therapeutic options for other respiratory viruses are largely lacking. Optimizing early diagnosis, refining antiviral strategies, and systematically addressing bacterial co-infections are critical to improving outcomes in patients with severe viral pneumonia.

1. Introduction

With the increasing use of molecular assays, the detection of viral pathogens in critically ill adults with respiratory illnesses has become more common. The reported prevalence rates range from 17% to 53%, depending on factors such as the study design, sample type, illness duration, and assay techniques. Viruses most frequently identified in patients with severe respiratory illnesses include influenza A and B, picornaviruses (like rhinovirus and enterovirus, e.g., enterovirus D68), human coronaviruses (229E, NL63, OC43, and HKU1), respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), human metapneumovirus (hMPV), parainfluenza virus, and adenovirus. In addition, emerging zoonotic coronaviruses—such as those causing Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), and COVID-19—continue to be identified. However, attributing clinical illness to a specific viral pathogen remains challenging. Some viruses, such as picornaviruses, may be detected in the upper respiratory tract without causing symptoms. Conversely, upper airway samples may yield false-negative results in patients with lower respiratory tract involvement. Furthermore, the co-detection of bacterial and, less frequently, fungal pathogens is common. Nevertheless, respiratory viruses are now widely recognized as independent causes of severe disease, particularly in older adults and those with underlying comorbidities (especially the immunocompromised), and occasionally in previously healthy individuals. These infections can also exacerbate chronic conditions and increase the risk of secondary infections.
The objective of this narrative review is to provide a comprehensive synthesis of the current evidence on the management of immunocompetent adults admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) for community-acquired severe acute respiratory infections (SARIs) caused by respiratory viruses (excluding SARS-CoV-2). The review specifically focuses on viral pathogens transmitted through the respiratory route and on immunocompetent adults. Herpesviruses will not be discussed, as they are not typical respiratory pathogens, are predominantly detected in nosocomial settings, and are primarily associated with viral reactivation and relative immunosuppression in mechanically ventilated patients, rather than with true respiratory acquisition.

Literature Search Strategy

This review is based on a comprehensive literature search conducted in PubMed and Google Scholar, focusing on publications from the period following the widespread implementation of PCR testing. For each respiratory virus addressed, all relevant studies were reviewed from the time PCR testing became routinely available, with earlier publications included when essential for clinical or historical context. Search strings combined MeSH terms and free-text keywords using Boolean operators, for example: (“lower respiratory tract infection” OR “pneumonia” OR “viral pneumonia”) AND (“influenza” OR “RSV” OR “respiratory syncytial virus” OR “human metapneumovirus” OR “rhinovirus” OR “adenovirus” OR “parainfluenza” OR “coronavirus”). The search was limited to English-language literature. Case reports were excluded, except for those concerning human bocavirus, due to the paucity of available clinical data. Recent and relevant peer-reviewed studies—including observational cohorts, randomized controlled trials, and meta-analyses—were prioritized. Reference lists of key articles were manually screened to ensure completeness. A total of 2897 records were initially identified through title screening. A subset was selected for abstract review, followed by the full-text evaluation of studies deemed relevant to the scope of this review.

2. Impact of Molecular Testing in Discovering Viruses in Lower Respiratory Tract Infections

The introduction of multiplex PCR (mPCR) after 2007, allowing the simultaneous detection of a broad spectrum of respiratory viruses, has profoundly transformed the epidemiological understanding of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs). Available platforms demonstrate a positive predictive agreement exceeding 95% when compared with gold-standard reference methods [1,2]. However, the clinical relevance of viral detection remains uncertain, ranging from true pathogenicity to incidental colonization or transient respiratory carriage. This variability likely depends on the specific virus involved, the host immune status, the timing of the specimen collection, and the anatomical sampling site.
While nasopharyngeal PCR remains the standard of care (SOC) for viral detection in most clinical settings, its relevance for diagnosing LRTIs is debated. Studies have reported both underdiagnosis—when upper airway samples yield false-negative results despite lower tract involvement—and overdiagnosis, particularly in the context of asymptomatic viral carriage or prolonged viral shedding [3]. Evidence from longitudinal nasopharyngeal sampling in U.S. households has demonstrated that a viral presence in the upper respiratory tract is common. In 108 individuals from 26 families sampled weekly, 783 viruses were recovered from nasopharyngeal PCR tests and were associated with respiratory symptoms in only 56% of cases [4]. A prolonged viral detection lasting more than 4 weeks was common for bocavirus and rhinovirus, likely reflecting either prolonged excretion or reinfections. These discrepancies highlight the limitations of relying solely on upper respiratory tract specimens for the diagnosis of severe viral pneumonia.
The use of mPCR assays that integrate both bacterial and viral targets may further influence the reported prevalence of viral infections. Among commercially available tools, the FilmArray Pneumonia Panel (FA-PP, bioMérieux™, Marcy l’Etoile, France) is currently the only mPCR platform that includes eight viral targets. Although increasing evidence supports the role of bacterial–viral co-infections in exacerbating pneumonia severity, the clinical utility of the FA-PP for their detection remains incompletely established [5,6,7,8]. The interpretation of viral epidemiology by the FA-PP is challenging due to substantial heterogeneity in study populations. Some studies focus exclusively on FA-PP-positive bacterial samples, which inherently biases the viral detection towards bacterial–viral co-infections [9,10,11]. Furthermore, studies often confound community- and hospital-acquired LRTIs or are limited to cohorts of SARS-CoV-2 infections, limiting conclusions about the broader role of viral detection [11,12]. Across published studies, viral detection rates using the FA-PP range from 15% to 51%, while bacterial–viral co-infections are identified in 10% to 38% of cases, depending on the population and pneumonia subtype [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]. In one study, the FA-PP identified nearly twice as many viral pathogens as the SOC testing, likely due to the broader scope of sputum testing compared to nasopharyngeal sampling [18]. However, in 95% of cases where the FA-PP was the only method used to detect a virus, no SOC test was performed, limiting direct comparisons and suggesting the underuse of viral diagnostics.
Collectively, these findings suggest that viral detection using mPCR pneumonia panels may provide useful clinical insight, particularly in critically ill patients. Nevertheless, the true impact of such diagnostics on clinical decision-making and patient outcomes remains to be clearly established. Further research is needed to clarify their role in pneumonia management. Table 1 summarizes the key features of currently available commercial respiratory mPCR kits.

3. Physiopathology of Respiratory Viral Infections

3.1. Epithelial Tropism and Viral-Induced Cell Death

Respiratory viruses, including influenza, RSV, and hMPV, demonstrate a marked tropism for the respiratory epithelium, infecting both the upper and lower respiratory tract. Influenza primarily targets ciliated epithelial cells in the upper airways and extends to secretory cells and type I and II alveolar epithelial cells in the lower respiratory tract [23,24]. Emerging evidence indicates that α2-6 sialic acids, predominantly expressed in the upper respiratory tract, are also present in respiratory bronchioles. This enables the viral spread to the lower airways, exacerbating epithelial damage and contributing to alveolar collapse [25,26]. Similarly, RSV and hMPV compromise the epithelial barrier by disrupting tight junctions and impairing ciliary function, thereby facilitating viral dissemination throughout the respiratory tree [27,28]. Adenoviruses, although less common, exhibit a similar capacity to infect alveolar structures and cause severe pulmonary injury, even in immunocompetent hosts [29,30]. Virus-induced cell death, including apoptosis and necrosis, exacerbates this epithelial damage [31,32]. For example, influenza and RSV trigger mitochondrial dysfunction and caspase activation, which impair repair mechanisms and compromise respiratory integrity [33,34]. Advanced experimental models, such as organoids and transcriptomics, further support the ability of these viruses to infect and damage alveolar epithelial cells, highlighting their capacity to disrupt the respiratory barrier [27,35]. Collectively, these findings underscore that the pathogenesis of these viruses involves the entire respiratory tree, explaining their central role in severe LRTIs and acute respiratory failure (ARF).

3.2. Immune Dysregulation and Inflammation-Mediated Injury

Respiratory viruses trigger immune responses that are essential for viral clearance but can also drive significant immune-mediated lung injuries [36]. Influenza infection induces a strong activation of macrophages and dendritic cells, resulting in the release of cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-6, and type I interferons. While these mediators are critical for recruiting immune cells and priming adaptive immunity, the excessive release may drive a “cytokine storm”, amplifying inflammation and causing diffuse alveolar damage and acute respiratory distress syndrome [37]. Similarly, RSV induces toll-like receptor activation on epithelial cells, leading to the production of chemokines, like IL-8, which recruit neutrophils and monocytes [27,38]. Although essential for pathogen clearance, these immune cells release reactive oxygen species and proteolytic enzymes that can exacerbate the epithelial injury. Respiratory viruses also alter the function of alveolar macrophages and CD8+ T cells. Macrophages, while pivotal for viral clearance, may adopt a pro-inflammatory phenotype, releasing TNF-α and IFN-γ. This overactivation contributes to epithelial disruption and lung injury. Similarly, CD8+ T cells eliminate infected epithelial cells but, when excessively activated, can cause tissue destruction and fibrosis [37]. Moreover, epithelial barrier disruption and impaired mucociliary clearance facilitate bacterial superinfections, particularly with Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus. This process is compounded by IFN-γ, which suppresses the alveolar macrophage-mediated bacterial clearance, further worsening lung injuries [39,40,41].

3.3. Histopathological Evidence from Human Studies

Histopathological studies demonstrate that respiratory viruses, including influenza, RSV, hMPV, and adenoviruses, cause significant injury in the lower respiratory tract. Findings from autopsy and biopsy studies reveal necrotizing bronchitis and bronchiolitis, diffuse alveolar damage with hyaline membranes, alveolar edema, and inflammatory cell infiltration as hallmarks of severe influenza infection [42]. RSV shows similar lesions, with the sloughing of the bronchiolar epithelium, mucus plugging, and neutrophilic alveolitis, contributing to airway obstruction and alveolar inflammation [43]. Adenoviruses induce necrotizing bronchopneumonia and interstitial inflammation, with severe cases reported in immunocompetent patients [44]. Although histopathological data on hMPV are scarce, the available evidence supports its potential to provoke interstitial and alveolar inflammation [45]. Across these infections, epithelial disruption facilitates secondary bacterial infections, which further exacerbate alveolar damage. The physiopathology of the respiratory viral lung injury is illustrated in Figure 1.

4. Clinical Consequences of Respiratory Virus in Severe Acute Respiratory Failure in ICU

Severe respiratory viral infections are a frequent cause of ICU admissions, typically presenting as ARF with or without pneumonia. Non-pneumonic ARF is often linked to exacerbations of underlying comorbidities, particularly chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and cardiovascular conditions [46].
While the association between respiratory viruses and COPD exacerbations is well established, emerging evidence underscores their role in triggering cardiovascular complications. In a cohort of 6248 adults aged ≥50 years hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed RSV infections, 22.4% experienced acute cardiac events, including acute heart failure (15.8%), acute ischemic heart disease (7.5%), and hypertensive crises (1.3%) [47]. Influenza has similarly been shown to markedly increase vascular risk, with one study reporting a nearly tenfold rise in myocardial infarction risk (IRR 9.80, 95% CI 2.37–40.5) and a twelvefold increase in stroke risk (IRR 12.3, 95% CI 5.48–27.7) during the first three days post-infection [48]. These findings highlight the capacity of respiratory viruses not only to cause direct pulmonary injury but also to precipitate systemic complications.
In addition to non-pneumonic presentations, respiratory viruses are well-recognized causes of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), with viral etiologies identified in approximately 30–40% of cases [5,49,50,51]. These infections typically present with systemic and respiratory symptoms, including fever, cough, myalgia, anorexia, and headache, with a median incubation period ≤ 7 days [52]. Importantly, this clinical presentation is neither specific to viral etiologies nor sufficient to distinguish between viral and bacterial causes [5,53]. Co-infections with bacterial pathogens are reported in up to 25% of viral pneumonia cases and are associated with a more severe presentation, including higher rates of sepsis and mechanical ventilation [5,54]. Thus, bacterial sampling remains crucial to guide timely antimicrobial therapy even when a viral pathogen is identified. These observations underscore the clinical heterogeneity of respiratory viral infections in ICU patients and the necessity of an integrated diagnostic approach to identify co-infections and systemic complications. Selected clinical vignettes are presented in Table 2.

5. Outcomes

Despite the clinical burden of respiratory viral infections, population-based epidemiological studies comparing outcomes remain scarce. Bajema et al. studied a retrospective cohort of 219,577 patients with a median age of 66 years from electronic health record data of non-hospitalized U.S. veterans who underwent same-day testing for SARS-CoV-2, influenza, and RSV during the autumn–winter season in 2023 and 2024 and had a single positive result (SARS-CoV-2 63%, RSV 11%, and influenzae 26%) [64]. The 30-day risk of hospitalization was similar for COVID-19 (16.2%) and influenza (16.3%), but lower for RSV (14.3%). The ICU admission rate was slightly higher for SARS-CoV-2 patients (3%) compared to RSV (1.8%) and influenza (1.5%). The 90-day risk of death was similar between the three (SARS-CoV-2: 1.8%, RSV: 1.4%, and influenzae: 1.3%).
In ICU settings, viral CAP exhibits a severity profile comparable to bacterial pneumonia, with median ventilation durations ranging from 7 to 10 days and mortality rates between 10% and 30% [5,50,65,66]. However, not all respiratory viruses carry the same prognostic weight. Among them, influenza and RSV have been consistently associated with severe outcomes in hospitalized and ICU populations. Grangier et al. reported comparable ICU lengths of stay for RSV and influenza (6–7 days), with mortality rates of 29% and 25%, respectively [65]. Similarly, Coussement et al. found no significant difference in ICU mortality between RSV (23.9%) and influenza (25.6%) [67]. hMPV, though less frequently identified, is another pathogen associated with severe disease, with ICU admission rates from 10% to 30% and early mortality between 3% and 10% [61,68,69].
By contrast, the pathogenic potential of other respiratory viruses in immunocompetent adults remains less clear. Adenoviruses, while capable of causing severe disease in immunocompromised individuals, rarely lead to severe outcomes in healthy adults. For instance, in one study involving military trainees, only 4.7% of adenovirus infections required ICU admission, and severe complications, such as ARDS, were isolated events [50,70,71]. Parainfluenza viruses, though frequently detected, are typically associated with mild disease in immunocompetent individuals, with ICU mortality rates of approximately 3% and a minimal need for mechanical ventilation [72,73]. Data on rhinovirus are more equivocal. Retrospective ICU studies estimate a mortality rate of around 30%, but these numbers are frequently confounded by co-infections or underlying conditions [74,75]. Seasonal coronaviruses, such as OC43, NL63, and 229E, are rarely implicated in severe pneumonia among immunocompetent adults, and their role as primary pathogens remains unclear [50,76,77]. Human bocavirus exhibits a similarly doubtful pathogenicity, with only sporadic reports of ARDS or ICU admission in adults [78,79].
Beyond viral etiology, bacterial co-infections represent a critical determinant of outcomes in ICU patients. Such co-infections have been reported in up to 25% of patients, depending on patient characteristics and the extent of bacterial sampling [5,46,50,51,80,81,82,83]. In ICU settings, Voiriot et al. showed that patients with mixed infections had higher mechanical ventilation rates and mortality (28.9%) compared with patients with isolated bacterial (13%) or viral (11.3%) infections [5]. These findings are supported by a meta-analysis showing a twofold increase in the mortality risk associated with mixed infections (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.32–3.31) [51]. Furthermore, a database study involving 15,906 patients with viral respiratory infections revealed that mixed infections were associated with a threefold increase in ICU admissions (OR 2.9, 95% CI 2.3–3.6) and 30-day mortality (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.9–3.7) [82].
Cardiovascular complications are another key factor worsening outcomes. In a large cohort of RSV-related hospitalizations, acute cardiac events were significantly associated with higher ICU admission rates (25.8% vs. 16.5%; ARR 1.54, 95% CI 1.23–1.93) and in-hospital mortality (8.1% vs. 4.0%; ARR 1.77, 95% CI 1.36–2.31) [47]. These findings underscore the critical importance of the early recognition and targeted management of cardiovascular complications in ICU patients with viral respiratory infections. Importantly, the role of respiratory viruses in precipitating COPD exacerbations has been extensively reviewed elsewhere. Clinical outcomes by virus types are summarized in Table 3.

Population at Risk of Severe Outcome

Among immunocompetent patients, an older age and pre-existing comorbidities—especially cardiopulmonary disease—are the most consistent predictors of adverse outcomes [92,93]. RSV hospitalization rates increase significantly with age, reaching 136.9–255.6 per 100,000 in individuals aged ≥65 years, with even higher rates observed in those with COPD, coronary artery disease, or heart failure [94]. Beyond acute complications, severe infections in older adults often lead to prolonged functional decline; for instance, 33% of RSV-hospitalized patients exhibit persistent impairments six months post-discharge [95]. Similarly, influenza disproportionately affects patients with pre-existing comorbidities, substantially increasing risks of hospitalization, ICU admission, and mortality [93]. These findings underscore the importance of targeted prevention and management strategies for high-risk populations, particularly older adults and individuals with cardiopulmonary diseases, to reduce both the immediate and long-term impacts of severe respiratory viral infections. Vaccines effective against RSV and influenza are cornerstones of the prevention strategy in these populations [96].

6. Treatment of Severe Respiratory Viral Infections

6.1. Noninvasive Respiratory Support in Viral Pneumonia

The COVID-19 pandemic re-established noninvasive respiratory support as a central component of acute respiratory failure management. Observational data from large cohorts initially suggested potential benefits of alternatives to standard oxygen therapy. In the COVID-19-ICU cohort (n = 4754), high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) was associated with a reduced risk of oxygenation failure—defined as intubation or death without intubation—compared to standard oxygen (adjusted OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.36–0.99), whereas noninvasive ventilation was associated with an increased 90-day mortality (adjusted OR 2.75; 95% CI 1.79–4.21) [97]. However, these findings were not confirmed in the COVIDICUS randomized trial (n = 546), which compared HFNC, CPAP, and standard oxygen in ICU patients with COVID-19. The study found no significant differences in 28-day intubation rates between HFNC and standard oxygen (HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.69–1.55), or between CPAP and standard oxygen (HR 1.08; 95% CI 0.71–1.63), challenging the assumption that advanced noninvasive strategies are superior in this setting [98].
There are currently no randomized data specifically addressing non-COVID-19 viral pneumonia. In this context, the evidence must be extrapolated from broader populations with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. A 2024 meta-analysis of 63 studies (n = 10,230) evaluated HFNC versus conventional oxygen therapy across various etiologies, including COVID-19 (n = 3782) and non-COVID-19 pneumonia (n = 1583). HFNC was associated with a reduced escalation to invasive ventilation (RR 0.85; 95% CI 0.76–0.95) and to noninvasive ventilation (RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.50–0.98) but had no effect on hospital mortality (RR 1.08; 95% CI 0.93–1.26). Although the population included some patients with non-COVID-19 pneumonia, no prespecified subgroup analysis was conducted.
Taken together, while HFNC appears safe and may reduce the need for intubation in selected patients, the current evidence does not support the preferential use of any specific noninvasive strategy in non-COVID-19 viral pneumonia. Outside of well-established indications—such as noninvasive ventilation in acute exacerbations of COPD or cardiogenic pulmonary edema—the choice of respiratory support remains empirical. Dedicated randomized trials are needed to evaluate ventilatory strategies in patients with confirmed viral pneumonia.

6.2. Antiviral Therapy

For severe influenza-associated pneumonia, neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs), particularly oseltamivir, remain the cornerstone of treatment despite limited evidence in critically ill patients. Key questions persist regarding the effectiveness of antivirals on patient outcomes, the optimal duration of therapy (5 days vs. prolonged courses), and whether monotherapy or combination regimens offer superior benefits. A recent meta-analysis of eight randomized controlled trials in severe influenza reported no significant differences in mortality or ICU admissions compared to placebos, but oseltamivir and peramivir reduced hospital stays by 1.63 and 1.73 days, respectively [99]. Observational studies suggest that an extended oseltamivir therapy (≥10 days) may yield better outcomes in ICU settings, with a 6.2% absolute reduction in mortality (adjusted OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.40–0.69), although these findings await confirmation in randomized trials [100]. Combination regimens, such as oseltamivir–zanamivir, have failed to demonstrate an added efficacy and may increase adverse effects [101]. Similarly, novel agents, like baloxavir, targeting distinct viral replication pathways, have not shown superiority in hospitalized patients. The FLAGSTONE trial confirmed that baloxavir combined with NAIs offered no clinical advantage over NAI monotherapy in severe cases [102]. Ongoing studies, including the REMAP-CAP trial (http://clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02735707), are expected to provide more clarity on the optimal antiviral strategies for critically ill patients with influenza.
RSV treatment remains a significant challenge. Ribavirin, historically considered for RSV, has demonstrated an inconsistent efficacy and potential toxicity, limiting its role, particularly in immunocompetent patients [81,103]. While prophylactic monoclonal antibodies, such as palivizumab and nirsevimab, have been explored for infants and high-risk children, their therapeutic potential in adults remains unproven and requires further investigation. Emerging agents, like zelicapavir, are currently under evaluation for older adults with cardiopulmonary comorbidities, but robust trial data are still awaited. For other respiratory viruses, effective antiviral therapies are unavailable, making supportive care, such as oxygen supplementation, advanced ventilatory strategies, and monitoring for bacterial superinfections, the primary approach. Promising investigation agents targeting viral fusion proteins and replication pathways show potential but remain in early development. Table 4 summarizes therapeutic options available in cases of severe RVI.

6.3. Immunomodulation

The role of corticosteroids in viral pneumonia remains highly debated. The CAPE-COD trial demonstrated a mortality reduction with low-dose hydrocortisone in severe CAP, though subgroup analyses did not specifically address viral etiologies [114]. In influenza-associated pneumonia, observational studies and meta-analyses have consistently indicated that corticosteroid use is associated with an increased mortality (OR 3.90, 95% CI 2.31–6.60) and higher rates of hospital-acquired infections (OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.51–4.95) [115]. However, these findings must be interpreted cautiously, as the absence of high-quality RCTs and the potential for confounding by indications—given that corticosteroids are often used in the most critically ill patients—complicate definitive conclusions. Beyond influenza, data on corticosteroid use in other viral respiratory infections remain limited, and no randomized controlled trials currently provide clear guidance. A recent individual participant data meta-analysis by Smit et al., evaluating corticosteroid therapy in severe CAP, found no statistically significant heterogeneity in treatment effect based on microbiological etiology [116]. However, point estimates of mortality reduction consistently disfavored corticosteroids in viral infections: −2.6% (95% CI −7.1 to 1.5) for viral CAP, −4.0% (−9.4 to 1.0) for viral-only CAP, −3.6% (−11.5 to 4.2) for influenza, and −4.4% (−13.4 to 4.2) for influenza-only cases. These trends underscore the need for caution when considering corticosteroids in the management of viral pneumonia in the absence of robust pathogen-specific evidence.
Efforts to address these evidence gaps are ongoing. Trials such as REMAP-CAP (http://clinicaltrias.gov: NCT02735707) and RECOVERY (http://clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04381936) are investigating the efficacy of corticosteroids and other immunomodulatory agents, including tocilizumab and baricitinib, across various viral pneumonias. These trials are essential for establishing evidence-based guidelines and optimizing outcomes in critically ill patients. Until then, the decision to use immunomodulatory therapies should remain highly individualized, carefully balancing potential risks—such as delayed viral clearance and secondary infections—against plausible clinical benefits in selected cases.

7. Vaccination as a Key Strategy Against Severe Respiratory Viral Infections

While antiviral treatments have shown variable efficacy, vaccination remains the most effective strategy for preventing severe respiratory viral infections (RVIs), particularly in high-risk populations such as the elderly. Among common seasonal respiratory viruses, vaccines are currently available for influenza and RSV, in addition to SARS-CoV-2.
For influenza, vaccine effectiveness is largely dependent on the antigenic match with circulating strains during a given season [117]. The greatest benefit is observed in individuals aged ≥65 years. A systematic review by Demicheli et al. found that influenza vaccination reduced the risk of confirmed influenza from 6% to 2.4%, and likely decreased the incidence of influenza-like illness from 6% to 3.5% in this population [118]. Newall et al. estimated that in the United States, a 1% increase in the overall influenza vaccine uptake during the influenza season was associated with a 0.33 (95% CI: 0.20–0.47) per 100,000 population reduction in pneumonia- and influenza-related deaths [119]. Similar findings were reported in France between 2000 and 2009, where vaccination prevented 2000 deaths annually and had an estimated effectiveness of 35% against influenza-attributable mortality. In this population, approximately 2650 vaccinations were required to prevent one influenza-related death among older adults [120].
A newly approved RSV vaccine has recently become available for older adults. Real-world data from an epidemic season (October 2023–March 2024) demonstrated that in individuals aged ≥60 years, the RSV vaccine effectiveness was 77% (95% CI: 70–83) against RSV-associated emergency department visits, 80% (95% CI: 71–85) against RSV-related hospitalization, and 81% (95% CI: 52–92) against ICU admission or death [121].
Finally, ensuring a high vaccine coverage against respiratory viruses that are now rare due to near-eradication remains crucial, as illustrated by the recent resurgence of measles in the United States (228 cases as of 7 March 2025) [122,123]. Measles is highly contagious (12–18 secondary cases per infected individual) and potentially fatal [124]. The current recommended two-dose vaccination strategy is highly effective, providing 90–99% protection. In infected individuals, pneumonitis is frequent but usually mild in immunocompetent patients; however, ARF requiring ICU admission occurs in about 3% of the cases [125]. In critically ill patients, the disease is much more severe. A French ICU cohort from the 2009–2011 outbreak showed that measles primarily affected young patients (median age: 29.2 years) who had not received the full two-dose vaccine regimen. The disease progression was severe, with ARDS occurring in 9 of 36 patients and mortality in 5 of 36 cases [126]. These findings collectively underscore the central role of vaccination in mitigating the burden of severe RVIs—both from currently circulating pathogens and from those re-emerging due to lapses in immunization coverage. For measles in particular, maintaining high vaccination rates is essential, as severe complications can occur even in previously healthy adults, and no specific antiviral treatment is available.

8. Future Risks

8.1. Post-Pandemic Effects

The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly reshaped the epidemiology of respiratory pathogens. Non-pharmaceutical interventions, such as lockdowns, mask mandates, and travel restrictions, led to an unprecedented decline in pathogen circulation. Influenza transmission, for instance, was reduced by over 95%, significantly disrupting global patterns of spread [127,128]. While these measures reduced short-term transmission, they also limited natural immunity development—a phenomenon referred to as “immunity debt”. Interruptions in vaccination campaigns and a reduced vaccine uptake further weakened the herd immunity, heightening the risk of severe post-pandemic outbreaks.
The case of influenza A(H3N2) illustrates the cascading consequences of these disruptions. In Australia, genetic analyses revealed that dominant H3N2 strains in 2022 (subclade 3C.2a1b.2a.2) were introduced via international travel after restrictions were lifted [129]. The antigenic drift between successive strains was linked to more intense epidemics, marked by higher transmission rates, increased adult cases, and H3N2 dominance [127,129,130]. Such examples demonstrate the enduring consequences of pandemic-related disruptions, emphasizing the importance of continuous surveillance, robust vaccination efforts, and targeted public health measures to address these evolving risks.

8.2. Emerging Threats

Beyond the established endemic respiratory viruses, emerging viral threats pose an increasing challenge to global health, driven by environmental changes, globalization, and evolving pathogen characteristics. The SARS, MERS, and COVID-19 pandemics underscore the potential for novel pathogens to cause severe outbreaks, with high mortality rates and a significant global impact [131,132]. Influenza remains a persistent concern, particularly the emergence of highly pathogenic avian strains with pandemic potential [63,133]. A(H5N1) virus spread from east Asia to west Asia and Africa is the most common. It was associated with a hospitalization rate of more than 90% and a case fatality rate of more than 50% [134]. Although few clustering cases have been reported, human to human transmission is unlikely. Beyond these known threats, arboviruses such as dengue and chikungunya are expanding geographically due to climate change and the proliferation of mosquito vectors [135,136]. This geographical shift poses a growing risk of outbreaks in previously unaffected regions, including parts of Europe. The resurgence of measles due to a decrease in vaccination coverage should also be kept in mind. These evolving dynamics highlight the urgent need for robust surveillance systems, cross-border collaboration, and innovative research to anticipate, detect, and mitigate the impact of respiratory viral emergencies. As masking is effective in reducing contamination, the situations where it should be recommended or mandated as well as the optimal filtration characteristics should be better defined [137].

9. Conclusions

Severe respiratory viral infections remain a major cause of ICU admissions, particularly in older adults and those with comorbidities. The widespread use of molecular diagnostics has improved viral detection, yet its clinical relevance, particularly in differentiating colonization from infection, remains debated. Influenza and Pneumoviridae (RSV, hMPV) are the most severe pathogens, often complicated by bacterial co-infections that worsen outcomes. While neuraminidase inhibitors are standard for severe influenza, effective antiviral options for other respiratory viruses are lacking. Future research should focus on optimizing antiviral strategies, refining the role of immunomodulation, and improving the early identification of high-risk patients to enhance clinical outcomes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization; methodology; investigation; resources; writing—original draft preparation and review and editing, D.M. and J.-F.T.; supervision, J.-F.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

J.F.T. declares scientific board participations at Menarini, Advanz, Merck, and Biomerieux and lectures in symposia for Qiagen, Biomerieux, Merck, Pfizer, Shionogi, and Mundipharma outside of the submitted work. D.M. declares lectures in symposia for Menarini.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ARDS acute respiratory distress syndrome
ARF acute respiratory failure
CAP community-acquired pneumonia
CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
CI confidence interval
COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
COVID-19 Coronavirus Disease 2019
FA-PPFilm-Array Pneumonia Panel
HFNChigh-flow nasal cannula
hMPV human metapneumovirus
ICU intensive care unit
IFN Interferon
IRR incidence rate ratio
LRTI lower respiratory tract infection
MERS Middle East Respiratory Syndrome
mPCRmultiplex PCR
NAI neuraminidase inhibitor
NPI non-pharmaceutical intervention
OR odds ratio
PCR Polymerase Chain Reaction
RSV respiratory syncytial virus
RVIrespiratory viral infection
SARIsevere acute respiratory infection
SARSSevere Acute Respiratory Syndrome
SARS-CoV-2 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2
SOCstandard of care
TNF tumor necrosis factor

References

  1. Leber, A.L.; Lisby, J.G.; Hansen, G.; Relich, R.F.; Schneider, U.V.; Granato, P.; Young, S.; Pareja, J.; Hannet, I. Multicenter Evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx Respiratory Panel for Detection of Viruses and Bacteria in Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2020, 58, e00155-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Visseaux, B.; Le Hingrat, Q.; Collin, G.; Bouzid, D.; Lebourgeois, S.; Le Pluart, D.; Deconinck, L.; Lescure, F.-X.; Lucet, J.-C.; Bouadma, L.; et al. Evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx Respiratory SARS-CoV-2 Panel, the First Rapid Multiplex PCR Commercial Assay for SARS-CoV-2 Detection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2020, 58, e00630-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. van Someren Gréve, F.; Juffermans, N.P.; Bos, L.D.J.; Binnekade, J.M.; Braber, A.; Cremer, O.L.; de Jonge, E.; Molenkamp, R.; Ong, D.S.Y.; Rebers, S.P.H.; et al. Respiratory Viruses in Invasively Ventilated Critically Ill Patients-A Prospective Multcenter Observational Study. Crit. Care Med. 2018, 46, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Byington, C.L.; Ampofo, K.; Stockmann, C.; Adler, F.R.; Herbener, A.; Miller, T.; Sheng, X.; Blaschke, A.J.; Crisp, R.; Pavia, A.T. Community Surveillance of Respiratory Viruses Among Families in the Utah Better Identification of Germs-Longitudinal Viral Epidemiology (BIG-LoVE) Study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2015, 61, 1217–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Voiriot, G.; Visseaux, B.; Cohen, J.; Nguyen, L.B.L.; Neuville, M.; Morbieu, C.; Burdet, C.; Radjou, A.; Lescure, F.-X.; Smonig, R.; et al. Viral-Bacterial Coinfection Affects the Presentation and Alters the Prognosis of Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia. Crit. Care 2016, 20, 375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Loubet, P.; Voiriot, G.; Houhou-Fidouh, N.; Neuville, M.; Bouadma, L.; Lescure, F.-X.; Descamps, D.; Timsit, J.-F.; Yazdanpanah, Y.; Visseaux, B. Impact of Respiratory Viruses in Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia in the Intensive Care Unit: A Single-Center Retrospective Study. J. Clin. Virol. 2017, 91, 52–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Martin-Loeches, I.; Schultz, M.J.; Vincent, J.-L.; Alvarez-Lerma, F.; Bos, L.D.; Solé-Violán, J.; Torres, A.; Rodriguez, A. Increased Incidence of Co-Infection in Critically Ill Patients with Influenza. Intensive Care Med. 2017, 43, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zilberbeg, M.D.; Khan, I.; Shorr, A.F. Respiratory Viruses in Nosocomial Pneumonia: An Evolving Paradigm. Viruses 2023, 15, 1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jitmuang, A.; Puttinad, S.; Hemvimol, S.; Pansasiri, S.; Horthongkham, N. A Multiplex Pneumonia Panel for Diagnosis of Hospital-Acquired and Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in the Era of Emerging Antimicrobial Resistance. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 977320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kosai, K.; Akamatsu, N.; Ota, K.; Mitsumoto-Kaseida, F.; Sakamoto, K.; Hasegawa, H.; Izumikawa, K.; Mukae, H.; Yanagihara, K. BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel Enhances Detection of Pathogens and Antimicrobial Resistance in Lower Respiratory Tract Specimens. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2022, 21, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Molina, F.J.; Botero, L.E.; Isaza, J.P.; Cano, L.E.; López, L.; Tamayo, L.; Torres, A. Diagnostic Concordance between BioFire® FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel and Culture in Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia Admitted to Intensive Care Units: The Experience of the Third Wave in Eight Hospitals in Colombia. Crit. Care 2022, 26, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Cohen, R.; Babushkin, F.; Finn, T.; Geller, K.; Alexander, H.; Datnow, C.; Uda, M.; Shapiro, M.; Paikin, S.; Lellouche, J. High Rates of Bacterial Pulmonary Co-Infections and Superinfections Identified by Multiplex PCR among Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gastli, N.; Loubinoux, J.; Daragon, M.; Lavigne, J.-P.; Saint-Sardos, P.; Pailhoriès, H.; Lemarié, C.; Benmansour, H.; d’Humières, C.; Broutin, L.; et al. Multicentric Evaluation of BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel for Rapid Bacteriological Documentation of Pneumonia. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2021, 27, 1308–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lee, S.H.; Ruan, S.-Y.; Pan, S.-C.; Lee, T.-F.; Chien, J.-Y.; Hsueh, P.-R. Performance of a Multiplex PCR Pneumonia Panel for the Identification of Respiratory Pathogens and the Main Determinants of Resistance from the Lower Respiratory Tract Specimens of Adult Patients in Intensive Care Units. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2019, 52, 920–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gong, J.; Yang, J.; Liu, L.; Chen, X.; Yang, G.; He, Y.; Sun, R. Evaluation and Clinical Practice of Pathogens and Antimicrobial Resistance Genes of BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel in Lower Respiratory Tract Infections. Infection 2024, 52, 545–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Verroken, A.; Favresse, J.; Anantharajah, A.; Rodriguez-Villalobos, H.; Wittebole, X.; Laterre, P.-F. Optimized Antibiotic Management of Critically Ill Patients with Severe Pneumonia Following Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Testing: A Prospective Clinical Exploratory Trial. Antibiotics 2024, 13, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Søgaard, K.K.; Hinic, V.; Goldenberger, D.; Gensch, A.; Schweitzer, M.; Bättig, V.; Siegemund, M.; Bassetti, S.; Bingisser, R.; Tamm, M.; et al. Evaluation of the Clinical Relevance of the Biofire© FilmArray Pneumonia Panel among Hospitalized Patients. Infection 2024, 52, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Falsey, A.R.; Branche, A.R.; Croft, D.P.; Formica, M.A.; Peasley, M.R.; Walsh, E.E. Real-Life Assessment of BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel in Adults Hospitalized with Respiratory Illness. J. Infect. Dis. 2024, 229, 214–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shen, X.; Feng, B.; Shi, W.; Cheng, W.; Zhang, T. Concomitant Viral and Bacterial Pneumonia among Patients in ICU with Mechanical Respiratory Support. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2022, 16, 1482–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kamel, N.A.; Alshahrani, M.Y.; Aboshanab, K.M.; El Borhamy, M.I. Evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel Plus to the Conventional Diagnostic Methods in Determining the Microbiological Etiology of Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia. Biology 2022, 11, 377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Enne, V.I.; Aydin, A.; Baldan, R.; Owen, D.R.; Richardson, H.; Ricciardi, F.; Russell, C.; Nomamiukor-Ikeji, B.O.; Swart, A.-M.; High, J.; et al. Multicentre Evaluation of Two Multiplex PCR Platforms for the Rapid Microbiological Investigation of Nosocomial Pneumonia in UK ICUs: The INHALE WP1 Study. Thorax 2022, 77, 1220–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Buchan, B.W.; Windham, S.; Balada-Llasat, J.-M.; Leber, A.; Harrington, A.; Relich, R.; Murphy, C.; Dien Bard, J.; Naccache, S.; Ronen, S.; et al. Practical Comparison of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel to Routine Diagnostic Methods and Potential Impact on Antimicrobial Stewardship in Adult Hospitalized Patients with Lower Respiratory Tract Infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2020, 58, e00135-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Matrosovich, M.N.; Matrosovich, T.Y.; Gray, T.; Roberts, N.A.; Klenk, H.-D. Human and Avian Influenza Viruses Target Different Cell Types in Cultures of Human Airway Epithelium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 4620–4624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Fiege, J.K.; Langlois, R.A. Investigating Influenza A Virus Infection: Tools to Track Infection and Limit Tropism. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 6167–6170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kumlin, U.; Olofsson, S.; Dimock, K.; Arnberg, N. Sialic Acid Tissue Distribution and Influenza Virus Tropism. Influenza Other Respir. Viruses 2008, 2, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Shinya, K.; Ebina, M.; Yamada, S.; Ono, M.; Kasai, N.; Kawaoka, Y. Influenza Virus Receptors in the Human Airway. Nature 2006, 440, 435–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nicolas de Lamballerie, C.; Pizzorno, A.; Dubois, J.; Julien, T.; Padey, B.; Bouveret, M.; Traversier, A.; Legras-Lachuer, C.; Lina, B.; Boivin, G.; et al. Characterization of Cellular Transcriptomic Signatures Induced by Different Respiratory Viruses in Human Reconstituted Airway Epithelia. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 11493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rameix-Welti, M.-A.; Le Goffic, R.; Hervé, P.-L.; Sourimant, J.; Rémot, A.; Riffault, S.; Yu, Q.; Galloux, M.; Gault, E.; Eléouët, J.-F. Visualizing the Replication of Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Cells and in Living Mice. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kajon, A.E.; Lu, X.; Erdman, D.D.; Louie, J.; Schnurr, D.; George, K.S.; Koopmans, M.P.; Allibhai, T.; Metzgar, D. Molecular Epidemiology and Brief History of Emerging Adenovirus 14-Associated Respiratory Disease in the United States. J. Infect. Dis. 2010, 202, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dudding, B.A.; Wagner, S.C.; Zeller, J.A.; Gmelich, J.T.; French, G.R.; Top, F.H. Fatal Pneumonia Associated with Adenovirus Type 7 in Three Military Trainees. N. Engl. J. Med. 1972, 286, 1289–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Arndt, U.; Wennemuth, G.; Barth, P.; Nain, M.; Al-Abed, Y.; Meinhardt, A.; Gemsa, D.; Bacher, M. Release of Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor and CXCL8/Interleukin-8 from Lung Epithelial Cells Rendered Necrotic by Influenza A Virus Infection. J. Virol. 2002, 76, 9298–9306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Lam, W.Y.; Tang, J.W.; Yeung, A.C.M.; Chiu, L.C.M.; Sung, J.J.Y.; Chan, P.K.S. Avian Influenza Virus A/HK/483/97(H5N1) NS1 Protein Induces Apoptosis in Human Airway Epithelial Cells. J. Virol. 2008, 82, 2741–2751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Atkin-Smith, G.K.; Duan, M.; Chen, W.; Poon, I.K.H. The Induction and Consequences of Influenza A Virus-Induced Cell Death. Cell Death Dis. 2018, 9, 1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hu, M.; Schulze, K.E.; Ghildyal, R.; Henstridge, D.C.; Kolanowski, J.L.; New, E.J.; Hong, Y.; Hsu, A.C.; Hansbro, P.M.; Wark, P.A.; et al. Respiratory Syncytial Virus Co-Opts Host Mitochondrial Function to Favour Infectious Virus Production. eLife 2019, 8, e42448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bui, C.H.T.; Chan, R.W.Y.; Ng, M.M.T.; Cheung, M.-C.; Ng, K.-C.; Chan, M.P.K.; Chan, L.L.Y.; Fong, J.H.M.; Nicholls, J.M.; Peiris, J.S.M.; et al. Tropism of Influenza B Viruses in Human Respiratory Tract Explants and Airway Organoids. Eur. Respir. J. 2019, 54, 1900008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Clementi, N.; Ghosh, S.; De Santis, M.; Castelli, M.; Criscuolo, E.; Zanoni, I.; Clementi, M.; Mancini, N. Viral Respiratory Pathogens and Lung Injury. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2021, 34, e00103-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Newton, A.H.; Cardani, A.; Braciale, T.J. ƒcousse The Host Immune Response in Respiratory Virus Infection: Balancing Virus Clearance and Immunopathology. Semin. Immunopathol. 2016, 38, 471–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Murawski, M.R.; Bowen, G.N.; Cerny, A.M.; Anderson, L.J.; Haynes, L.M.; Tripp, R.A.; Kurt-Jones, E.A.; Finberg, R.W. Respiratory Syncytial Virus Activates Innate Immunity through Toll-Like Receptor 2. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 1492–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sun, K.; Metzger, D.W. Inhibition of Pulmonary Antibacterial Defense by Interferon-γ during Recovery from Influenza Infection. Nat. Med. 2008, 14, 558–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Stark, J.M.; Stark, M.A.; Colasurdo, G.N.; LeVine, A.M. Decreased Bacterial Clearance from the Lungs of Mice Following Primary Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection. J. Med. Virol. 2006, 78, 829–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Iverson, A.R.; Boyd, K.L.; McAuley, J.L.; Plano, L.R.; Hart, M.E.; McCullers, J.A. Influenza Virus Primes Mice for Pneumonia From Staphylococcus Aureus. J. Infect. Dis. 2011, 203, 880–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Taubenberger, J.K.; Morens, D.M. The Pathology of Influenza Virus Infections. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2008, 3, 499–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Johnson, J.E.; Gonzales, R.A.; Olson, S.J.; Wright, P.F.; Graham, B.S. The Histopathology of Fatal Untreated Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection. Mod. Pathol. 2007, 20, 108–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pritt, B.S.; Aubry, M.C. Histopathology of Viral Infections of the Lung. Semin. Diagn. Pathol. 2017, 34, 510–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Vargas, S.O.; Kozakewich, H.P.W.; Perez-Atayde, A.R.; McAdam, A.J. Pathology of Human Metapneumovirus Infection: Insights into the Pathogenesis of a Newly Identified Respiratory Virus. Pediatr. Dev. Pathol. 2004, 7, 478–486; discussion 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Mokrani, D.; Le Hingrat, Q.; Thy, M.; Choquet, C.; Joly, V.; Lariven, S.; Rioux, C.; Deconinck, L.; Loubet, P.; Papo, T.; et al. Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Respiratory Syncytial Virus-Associated ARF in Immunocompetent Patients: A Seven-Year Experience at a Tertiary Hospital in France. J. Infect. 2024, 89, 106180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Woodruff, R.C.; Melgar, M.; Pham, H.; Sperling, L.S.; Loustalot, F.; Kirley, P.D.; Austin, E.; Yousey-Hindes, K.; Openo, K.P.; Ryan, P.; et al. Acute Cardiac Events in Hospitalized Older Adults with Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection. JAMA Intern. Med. 2024, 184, 602–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Warren-Gash, C.; Blackburn, R.; Whitaker, H.; McMenamin, J.; Hayward, A.C. Laboratory-Confirmed Respiratory Infections as Triggers for Acute Myocardial Infarction and Stroke: A Self-Controlled Case Series Analysis of National Linked Datasets from Scotland. Eur. Respir. J. 2018, 51, 1701794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Shorr, A.F.; Fisher, K.; Micek, S.T.; Kollef, M.H. The Burden of Viruses in Pneumonia Associated with Acute Respiratory Failure: An Underappreciated Issue. Chest 2018, 154, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Choi, S.-H.; Hong, S.-B.; Ko, G.-B.; Lee, Y.; Park, H.J.; Park, S.-Y.; Moon, S.M.; Cho, O.-H.; Park, K.-H.; Chong, Y.P.; et al. Viral Infection in Patients with Severe Pneumonia Requiring Intensive Care Unit Admission. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2012, 186, 325–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Burk, M.; El-Kersh, K.; Saad, M.; Wiemken, T.; Ramirez, J.; Cavallazzi, R. Viral Infection in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Eur. Respir. Rev. 2016, 25, 178–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Jennings, L.C.; Anderson, T.P.; Beynon, K.A.; Chua, A.; Laing, R.T.R.; Werno, A.M.; Young, S.A.; Chambers, S.T.; Murdoch, D.R. Incidence and Characteristics of Viral Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults. Thorax 2008, 63, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lieberman, D.; Shimoni, A.; Shemer-Avni, Y.; Keren-Naos, A.; Shtainberg, R.; Lieberman, D. Respiratory Viruses in Adults with Community-Acquired Pneumonia. Chest 2010, 138, 811–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Montull, B.; Menéndez, R.; Torres, A.; Reyes, S.; Méndez, R.; Zalacaín, R.; Capelastegui, A.; Rajas, O.; Borderías, L.; Martin-Villasclaras, J.; et al. Predictors of Severe Sepsis among Patients Hospitalized for Community-Acquired Pneumonia. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0145929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Krammer, F.; Smith, G.J.D.; Fouchier, R.A.M.; Peiris, M.; Kedzierska, K.; Doherty, P.C.; Palese, P.; Shaw, M.L.; Treanor, J.; Webster, R.G.; et al. Influenza. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2018, 4, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Fartoukh, M.; Voiriot, G.; Guérin, L.; Ricard, J.D.; Combes, A.; Faure, M.; Benghanem, S.; de Montmollin, E.; Tandjaoui-Lambiotte, Y.; Vieillard-Baron, A.; et al. Seasonal Burden of Severe Influenza Virus Infection in the Critically Ill Patients, Using the Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Clinical Data Warehouse: A Pilot Study. Ann. Intensive Care 2021, 11, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. de Prost, N.; Audureau, E.; Guillon, A.; Handala, L.; Préau, S.; Guigon, A.; Uhel, F.; Le Hingrat, Q.; Delamaire, F.; Grolhier, C.; et al. Clinical Phenotypes and Outcomes Associated with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Sublineage JN.1 in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: A Prospective, Multicenter Cohort Study in France, November 2022 to January 2024. Ann. Intensive Care 2024, 14, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Datadot [En Ligne]. COVID-19 Cases|WHO COVID-19 Dashboard. Available online: https://data.who.int/dashboards/covid19/cases (accessed on 21 March 2025).
  59. Kaku, Y.; Uriu, K.; Okumura, K.; Genotype to Phenotype Japan (G2P-Japan) Consortium; Ito, J.; Sato, K. Virological Characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 KP.3.1.1 Variant. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2024, 24, e609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gaillet, A.; Layese, R.; Fourati, S.; Celante, H.; Pham, T.; Benghanem, S.; Mekontso Dessap, A.; de Montmollin, E.; Pirault, J.; Vieillard-Baron, A.; et al. Clinical Phenotypes and Outcomes Associated with Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Multicentre Cohort Study in Great Paris Area Hospitals, 2017–2023. J. Infect. Dis. 2025, jiaf129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Philippot, Q.; Rammaert, B.; Dauriat, G.; Daubin, C.; Schlemmer, F.; Costantini, A.; Tandjaoui-Lambiotte, Y.; Neuville, M.; Desrochettes, E.; Ferré, A.; et al. Human Metapneumovirus Infection Is Associated with a Substantial Morbidity and Mortality Burden in Adult Inpatients. Heliyon 2024, 10, e33231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lin, F.; Zhou, Q.; Li, W.; Xiao, W.; Li, S.; Liu, B.; Li, H.; Cui, Y.; Lu, R.; Li, Y.; et al. A Prediction Model for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Immunocompetent Adults with Adenovirus-Associated Pneumonia: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis. BMC Pulm. Med. 2023, 23, 431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Garg, S.; Reinhart, K.; Couture, A.; Kniss, K.; Davis, C.T.; Kirby, M.K.; Murray, E.L.; Zhu, S.; Kraushaar, V.; Wadford, D.A.; et al. Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5N1) Virus Infections in Humans. N. Engl. J. Med. 2025, 392, 843–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Bajema, K.L.; Bui, D.P.; Yan, L.; Li, Y.; Rajeevan, N.; Vergun, R.; Berry, K.; Huang, Y.; Lin, H.-M.; Aslan, M.; et al. Severity and Long-Term Mortality of COVID-19, Influenza, and Respiratory Syncytial Virus. JAMA Intern. Med. 2025, 185, 324–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Grangier, B.; Vacheron, C.-H.; De Marignan, D.; Casalegno, J.-S.; Couray-Targe, S.; Bestion, A.; Ader, F.; Richard, J.-C.; Frobert, E.; Argaud, L.; et al. Comparison of Mortality and Outcomes of Four Respiratory Viruses in the Intensive Care Unit: A Multicenter Retrospective Study. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 6690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Cillóniz, C.; Ewig, S.; Ferrer, M.; Polverino, E.; Gabarrús, A.; Puig de la Bellacasa, J.; Mensa, J.; Torres, A. Community-Acquired Polymicrobial Pneumonia in the Intensive Care Unit: Aetiology and Prognosis. Crit. Care 2011, 15, R209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Coussement, J.; Zuber, B.; Garrigues, E.; Gros, A.; Vandueren, C.; Epaillard, N.; Voiriot, G.; Tandjaoui-Lambiotte, Y.; Lascarrou, J.-B.; Boissier, F.; et al. Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients in the ICU with Respiratory Syncytial Virus Compared with Those with Influenza Infection: A Multicenter Matched Cohort Study. Chest 2022, 161, 1475–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Choi, S.-H.; Hong, S.-B.; Huh, J.W.; Jung, J.; Kim, M.J.; Chong, Y.P.; Kim, S.-H.; Sung, H.; Koo, H.J.; Do, K.-H.; et al. Outcomes of Severe Human Metapneumovirus-Associated Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults. J. Clin. Virol. 2019, 117, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Hasvold, J.; Sjoding, M.; Pohl, K.; Cooke, C.; Hyzy, R.C. The Role of Human Metapneumovirus in the Critically Ill Adult Patient. J. Crit. Care 2016, 31, 233–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Vento, T.J.; Prakash, V.; Murray, C.K.; Brosch, L.C.; Tchandja, J.B.; Cogburn, C.; Yun, H.C. Pneumonia in Military Trainees: A Comparison Study Based on Adenovirus Serotype 14 Infection. J. Infect. Dis. 2011, 203, 1388–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wiemken, T.; Peyrani, P.; Bryant, K.; Kelley, R.R.; Summersgill, J.; Arnold, F.; Carrico, R.; McKinney, W.P.; Jonsson, C.; Carrico, K.; et al. Incidence of Respiratory Viruses in Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: Results from the Severe Influenza Pneumonia Surveillance (SIPS) Project. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2013, 32, 705–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zhou, F.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Liu, X.; Gu, L.; Zhang, X.; Pu, Z.; Yang, G.; Liu, B.; Nie, Q.; et al. Disease Severity and Clinical Outcomes of Community-Acquired Pneumonia Caused by Non-Influenza Respiratory Viruses in Adults: A Multicentre Prospective Registry Study from the CAP-China Network. Eur. Respir. J. 2019, 54, 1802406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Russell, E.; Yang, A.; Tardrew, S.; Ison, M.G. Parainfluenza Virus in Hospitalized Adults: A 7-Year Retrospective Study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2019, 68, 298–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Karhu, J.; Ala-Kokko, T.I.; Vuorinen, T.; Ohtonen, P.; Syrjälä, H. Lower Respiratory Tract Virus Findings in Mechanically Ventilated Patients with Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2014, 59, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Choi, S.-H.; Huh, J.W.; Hong, S.-B.; Lee, J.Y.; Kim, S.-H.; Sung, H.; Do, K.-H.; Lee, S.-O.; Kim, M.-N.; Jeong, J.-Y.; et al. Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Severe Rhinovirus-Associated Pneumonia Identified by Bronchoscopic Bronchoalveolar Lavage in Adults: Comparison with Severe Influenza Virus-Associated Pneumonia. J. Clin. Virol. 2015, 62, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Gaunt, E.R.; Hardie, A.; Claas, E.C.J.; Simmonds, P.; Templeton, K.E. Epidemiology and Clinical Presentations of the Four Human Coronaviruses 229E, HKU1, NL63, and OC43 Detected over 3 Years Using a Novel Multiplex Real-Time PCR Method. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2010, 48, 2940–2947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Chung, H.; Hong, S.-B.; Huh, J.W.; Sung, H.; Do, K.-H.; Lee, S.-O.; Lim, C.-M.; Koh, Y.; Choi, S.-H. Clinical Features and Outcomes of Severe Pneumonia Caused by Endemic Human Coronavirus in Adults. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2022, 205, 1116–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Choi, S.-H.; Huh, J.W.; Hong, S.-B.; Jung, J.; Kim, M.J.; Chong, Y.P.; Kim, S.-H.; Sung, H.; Chae, E.J.; Do, K.-H.; et al. Severe Human Bocavirus-Associated Pneumonia in Adults at a Referral Hospital, Seoul, South Korea. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2021, 27, 226–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ishiguro, T.; Hirota, S.; Kobayashi, Y.; Takano, K.; Kobayashi, Y.; Shimizu, Y.; Takayanagi, N. Fatal Primary Human Bocavirus Pneumonia in an Immunocompetent Adult. Intern. Med. 2020, 59, 421–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Lee, N.; Lui, G.C.Y.; Wong, K.T.; Li, T.C.M.; Tse, E.C.M.; Chan, J.Y.C.; Yu, J.; Wong, S.S.M.; Choi, K.W.; Wong, R.Y.K.; et al. High Morbidity and Mortality in Adults Hospitalized for Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2013, 57, 1069–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Celante, H.; Oubaya, N.; Fourati, S.; Beaune, S.; Khellaf, M.; Casalino, E.; Ricard, J.-D.; Vieillard-Baron, A.; Heming, N.; Mekontso Dessap, A.; et al. Prognosis of Hospitalised Adult Patients with Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection: A Multicentre Retrospective Cohort Study. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2023, 29, 943.e1–943.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Liu, Y.; Ling, L.; Wong, S.H.; Wang, M.H.; Fitzgerald, J.R.; Zou, X.; Fang, S.; Liu, X.; Wang, X.; Hu, W.; et al. Outcomes of Respiratory Viral-Bacterial Co-Infection in Adult Hospitalized Patients. eClinicalMedicine 2021, 37, 100955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Loubet, P.; Fernandes, J.; de Pouvourville, G.; Sosnowiez, K.; Elong, A.; Guilmet, C.; Omichessan, H.; Bureau, I.; Fagnani, F.; Emery, C.; et al. Respiratory Syncytial Virus-Related Hospital Stays in Adults in France from 2012 to 2021: A National Hospital Database Study. J. Clin. Virol. 2024, 171, 105635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ackerson, B.; Tseng, H.F.; Sy, L.S.; Solano, Z.; Slezak, J.; Luo, Y.; Fischetti, C.A.; Shinde, V. Severe Morbidity and Mortality Associated with Respiratory Syncytial Virus Versus Influenza Infection in Hospitalized Older Adults. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2019, 69, 197–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Beumer, M.C.; Koch, R.M.; van Beuningen, D.; OudeLashof, A.M.; van de Veerdonk, F.L.; Kolwijck, E.; van der Hoeven, J.G.; Bergmans, D.C.; Hoedemaekers, C.W.E. Influenza Virus and Factors That Are Associated with ICU Admission, Pulmonary Co-Infections and ICU Mortality. J. Crit. Care 2019, 50, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Verdier, V.; Lilienthal, F.; Desvergez, A.; Gazaille, V.; Winer, A.; Paganin, F. Severe Forms of Influenza Infections Admitted in Intensive Care Units: Analysis of Mortality Factors. Influenza Other Respir. Viruses 2023, 17, e13168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Bonmarin, I.; Belchior, E.; Bergounioux, J.; Brun-Buisson, C.; Mégarbane, B.; Chappert, J.L.; Hubert, B.; Strat, Y.L.; Lévy-Bruhl, D. Intensive Care Unit Surveillance of Influenza Infection in France: The 2009/10 Pandemic and the Three Subsequent Seasons. Eurosurveillance 2015, 20, 30066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Bouzid, D.; Hadad, O.; Bertine, M.; Houhou-Fidouh, N.; Mirand, A.; Duval, X.; Bunel, V.; Borie, R.; Lucet, J.C.; Descamps, D.; et al. Rhinoviruses: Molecular Diversity and Clinical Characteristics. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2022, 118, 144–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Boon, H.; Meinders, A.-J.; van Hannen, E.J.; Tersmette, M.; Schaftenaar, E. Comparative Analysis of Mortality in Patients Admitted with an Infection with Influenza A/B Virus, Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Rhinovirus, Metapneumovirus or SARS-CoV-2. Influenza Other Respir. Viruses 2024, 18, e13237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Rodriguez-Nava, G.; Egoryan, G.; Dong, T.; Zhang, Q.; Hyser, E.; Poudel, B.; Yanez-Bello, M.A.; Trelles-Garcia, D.P.; Chung, C.W.; Pyakuryal, B.; et al. Comparison of Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Hospitalized Patients with Seasonal Coronavirus Infection and COVID-19: A Retrospective Cohort Study. BMC Infect. Dis. 2022, 22, 618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Lee, N.; Smith, S.; Zelyas, N.; Klarenbach, S.; Zapernick, L.; Bekking, C.; So, H.; Yip, L.; Tipples, G.; Taylor, G.; et al. Burden of Noninfluenza Respiratory Viral Infections in Adults Admitted to Hospital: Analysis of a Multiyear Canadian Surveillance Cohort from 2 Centres. CMAJ 2021, 193, E439–E446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Savic, M.; Penders, Y.; Shi, T.; Branche, A.; Pirçon, J.-Y. Respiratory Syncytial Virus Disease Burden in Adults Aged 60 Years and Older in High-Income Countries: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis. Influenza Other Respir. Viruses 2023, 17, e13031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Maleki, F.; Welch, V.; Lopez, S.M.C.; Cane, A.; Langer, J.; Enstone, A.; Markus, K.; Wright, O.; Hewitt, N.; Whittle, I. Understanding the Global Burden of Influenza in Adults Aged 18–64 Years: A Systematic Literature Review from 2012 to 2022. Adv. Ther. 2023, 40, 4166–4188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Branche, A.R.; Saiman, L.; Walsh, E.E.; Falsey, A.R.; Sieling, W.D.; Greendyke, W.; Peterson, D.R.; Vargas, C.Y.; Phillips, M.; Finelli, L. Incidence of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection Among Hospitalized Adults, 2017-2020. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2022, 74, 1004–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Branche, A.R.; Saiman, L.; Walsh, E.E.; Falsey, A.R.; Jia, H.; Barrett, A.; Alba, L.; Phillips, M.; Finelli, L. Change in Functional Status Associated with Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection in Hospitalized Older Adults. Influenza Other Respir. Viruses 2022, 16, 1151–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Bajema, K.L.; Yan, L.; Li, Y.; Argraves, S.; Rajeevan, N.; Fox, A.; Vergun, R.; Berry, K.; Bui, D.; Huang, Y.; et al. Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccine Effectiveness among US Veterans, September, 2023 to March, 2024: A Target Trial Emulation Study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Schmidt, M.; Demoule, A.; Hajage, D.; Pham, T.; Combes, A.; Dres, M.; Lebbah, S.; Kimmoun, A.; Mercat, A.; Beduneau, G.; et al. Benefits and Risks of Noninvasive Oxygenation Strategy in COVID-19: A Multicenter, Prospective Cohort Study (COVID-ICU) in 137 Hospitals. Crit. Care 2021, 25, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Bouadma, L.; Mekontso-Dessap, A.; Burdet, C.; Merdji, H.; Poissy, J.; Dupuis, C.; Guitton, C.; Schwebel, C.; Cohen, Y.; Bruel, C.; et al. High-Dose Dexamethasone and Oxygen Support Strategies in Intensive Care Unit Patients with Severe COVID-19 Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: The COVIDICUS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern. Med. 2022, 182, 906–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Gao, Y.; Guyatt, G.; Uyeki, T.M.; Liu, M.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Shen, Y.; Xu, J.; Zheng, Q.; Li, Z.; et al. Antivirals for Treatment of Severe Influenza: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. Lancet 2024, 404, 753–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Moreno, G.; Carbonell, R.; Díaz, E.; Martín-Loeches, I.; Restrepo, M.I.; Reyes, L.F.; Solé-Violán, J.; Bodí, M.; Canadell, L.; Guardiola, J.; et al. Effectiveness of Prolonged versus Standard-Course of Oseltamivir in Critically Ill Patients with Severe Influenza Infection: A Multicentre Cohort Study. J. Med. Virol. 2023, 95, e29010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Duval, X.; van der Werf, S.; Blanchon, T.; Mosnier, A.; Bouscambert-Duchamp, M.; Tibi, A.; Enouf, V.; Charlois-Ou, C.; Vincent, C.; Andreoletti, L.; et al. Efficacy of Oseltamivir-Zanamivir Combination Compared to Each Monotherapy for Seasonal Influenza: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial. PLoS Med. 2010, 7, e1000362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Kumar, D.; Ison, M.G.; Mira, J.-P.; Welte, T.; Hwan Ha, J.; Hui, D.S.; Zhong, N.; Saito, T.; Katugampola, L.; Collinson, N.; et al. Combining Baloxavir Marboxil with Standard-of-Care Neuraminidase Inhibitor in Patients Hospitalised with Severe Influenza (FLAGSTONE): A Randomised, Parallel-Group, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Superiority Trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2022, 22, 718–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Tejada, S.; Martinez-Reviejo, R.; Karakoc, H.N.; Peña-López, Y.; Manuel, O.; Rello, J. Ribavirin for Treatment of Subjects with Respiratory Syncytial Virus-Related Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Adv. Ther. 2022, 39, 4037–4051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Hanula, R.; Bortolussi-Courval, É.; Mendel, A.; Ward, B.J.; Lee, T.C.; McDonald, E.G. Evaluation of Oseltamivir Used to Prevent Hospitalization in Outpatients with Influenza: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Intern. Med. 2024, 184, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Gubareva, L.V.; Besselaar, T.G.; Daniels, R.S.; Fry, A.; Gregory, V.; Huang, W.; Hurt, A.C.; Jorquera, P.A.; Lackenby, A.; Leang, S.-K.; et al. Global Update on the Susceptibility of Human Influenza Viruses to Neuraminidase Inhibitors, 2015–2016. Antivir. Res. 2017, 146, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Lina, B.; Boucher, C.; Osterhaus, A.; Monto, A.S.; Schutten, M.; Whitley, R.J.; Nguyen-Van-Tam, J.S. Five Years of Monitoring for the Emergence of Oseltamivir Resistance in Patients with Influenza A Infections in the Influenza Resistance Information Study. Influenza Other Respir. Viruses 2018, 12, 267–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Kohno, S.; Yen, M.-Y.; Cheong, H.-J.; Hirotsu, N.; Ishida, T.; Kadota, J.; Mizuguchi, M.; Kida, H.; Shimada, J. S-021812 Clinical Study Group Phase III Randomized, Double-Blind Study Comparing Single-Dose Intravenous Peramivir with Oral Oseltamivir in Patients with Seasonal Influenza Virus Infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 5267–5276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Chen, H.-D.; Wang, X.; Yu, S.-L.; Ding, Y.-H.; Wang, M.-L.; Wang, J.-N. Clinical Effectiveness of Intravenous Peramivir Compared with Oseltamivir in Patients with Severe Influenza A with Primary Viral Pneumonia: A Randomized Controlled Study. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2021, 8, ofaa562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Marty, F.M.; Vidal-Puigserver, J.; Clark, C.; Gupta, S.K.; Merino, E.; Garot, D.; Chapman, M.J.; Jacobs, F.; Rodriguez-Noriega, E.; Husa, P.; et al. Intravenous Zanamivir or Oral Oseltamivir for Hospitalised Patients with Influenza: An International, Randomised, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Phase 3 Trial. Lancet Respir. Med. 2017, 5, 135–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Hayden, F.G.; Sugaya, N.; Hirotsu, N.; Lee, N.; de Jong, M.D.; Hurt, A.C.; Ishida, T.; Sekino, H.; Yamada, K.; Portsmouth, S.; et al. Baloxavir Marboxil for Uncomplicated Influenza in Adults and Adolescents. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 379, 913–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Ison, M.G.; Portsmouth, S.; Yoshida, Y.; Shishido, T.; Mitchener, M.; Tsuchiya, K.; Uehara, T.; Hayden, F.G. Early Treatment with Baloxavir Marboxil in High-Risk Adolescent and Adult Outpatients with Uncomplicated Influenza (CAPSTONE-2): A Randomised, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, 1204–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Manothummetha, K.; Mongkolkaew, T.; Tovichayathamrong, P.; Boonyawairote, R.; Meejun, T.; Srisurapanont, K.; Phongkhun, K.; Sanguankeo, A.; Torvorapanit, P.; Moonla, C.; et al. Ribavirin Treatment for Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection in Patients with Haematologic Malignancy and Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2023, 29, 1272–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Lindemans, C.A.; Leen, A.M.; Boelens, J.J. How I Treat Adenovirus in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients. Blood 2010, 116, 5476–5485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Dequin, P.-F.; Meziani, F.; Quenot, J.-P.; Kamel, T.; Ricard, J.-D.; Badie, J.; Reignier, J.; Heming, N.; Plantefève, G.; Souweine, B.; et al. Hydrocortisone in Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2023, 388, 1931–1941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Lansbury, L.E.; Rodrigo, C.; Leonardi-Bee, J.; Nguyen-Van-Tam, J.; Shen Lim, W. Corticosteroids as Adjunctive Therapy in the Treatment of Influenza: An Updated Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Crit. Care Med. 2020, 48, e98–e106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Smit, J.M.; Van Der Zee, P.A.; Stoof, S.C.M.; Van Genderen, M.E.; Snijders, D.; Boersma, W.G.; Confalonieri, P.; Salton, F.; Confalonieri, M.; Shih, M.-C.; et al. Predicting Benefit from Adjuvant Therapy with Corticosteroids in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Data-Driven Analysis of Randomised Trials. Lancet Respir. Med. 2025, 13, 221–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Tanner, A.R.; Dorey, R.B.; Brendish, N.J.; Clark, T.W. Influenza Vaccination: Protecting the Most Vulnerable. Eur. Respir. Rev. 2021, 30, 200258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Demicheli, V.; Jefferson, T.; Di Pietrantonj, C.; Ferroni, E.; Thorning, S.; Thomas, R.E.; Rivetti, A. Vaccines for Preventing Influenza in the Elderly. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2018, 2, CD004876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Newall, A.T.; Nazareno, A.L.; Muscatello, D.J.; Boettiger, D.; Viboud, C.; Simonsen, L.; Turner, R.M. The Association between Influenza Vaccination Uptake and Influenza and Pneumonia-Associated Deaths in the United States. Vaccine 2024, 42, 2044–2050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Bonmarin, I.; Belchior, E.; Lévy-Bruhl, D. Impact of Influenza Vaccination on Mortality in the French Elderly Population during the 2000–2009 Period. Vaccine 2015, 33, 1099–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Payne, A.B.; Watts, J.A.; Mitchell, P.K.; Dascomb, K.; Irving, S.A.; Klein, N.P.; Grannis, S.J.; Ong, T.C.; Ball, S.W.; DeSilva, M.B.; et al. Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Vaccine Effectiveness against RSV-Associated Hospitalisations and Emergency Department Encounters among Adults Aged 60 Years and Older in the USA, October, 2023, to March, 2024: A Test-Negative Design Analysis. Lancet 2024, 404, 1547–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Dyer, O. Measles: Texas Outbreak Spreads to New Mexico. BMJ 2025, 388, r357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Kuppalli, K.; Perl, T.M. Measles in Texas: Waning Vaccination and a Stark Warning for Public Health. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2025, 25, 485–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Hübschen, J.M.; Gouandjika-Vasilache, I.; Dina, J. Measles. Lancet 2022, 399, 678–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Lombardo, D.; Ciampi, G.; Spicuzza, L. Severe and Fatal Measles-Associated Pneumonia during an Outbreak in Italy: Data from the Heart of the Epidemic. Adv. Respir. Med. 2020, 88, 197–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Rafat, C.; Klouche, K.; Ricard, J.-D.; Messika, J.; Roch, A.; Machado, S.; Sonneville, R.; Guisset, O.; Pujol, W.; Guérin, C.; et al. Severe Measles Infection: The Spectrum of Disease in 36 Critically Ill Adult Patients. Medicine 2013, 92, 257–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Chen, Z.; Tsui, J.L.-H.; Gutierrez, B.; Busch Moreno, S.; du Plessis, L.; Deng, X.; Cai, J.; Bajaj, S.; Suchard, M.A.; Pybus, O.G.; et al. COVID-19 Pandemic Interventions Reshaped the Global Dispersal of Seasonal Influenza Viruses. Science 2024, 386, eadq3003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Chow, E.J.; Uyeki, T.M.; Chu, H.Y. The Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Community Respiratory Virus Activity. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2023, 21, 195–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Wang, X.; Walker, G.; Kim, K.W.; Stelzer-Braid, S.; Scotch, M.; Rawlinson, W.D. The Resurgence of Influenza A/H3N2 Virus in Australia after the Relaxation of COVID-19 Restrictions during the 2022 Season. J. Med. Virol. 2024, 96, e29922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Perofsky, A.C.; Huddleston, J.; Hansen, C.L.; Barnes, J.R.; Rowe, T.; Xu, X.; Kondor, R.; Wentworth, D.E.; Lewis, N.; Whittaker, L.; et al. Antigenic Drift and Subtype Interference Shape A(H3N2) Epidemic Dynamics in the United States. Elife 2024, 13, RP91849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Rabaan, A.A.; Alenazy, M.F.; Alshehri, A.A.; Alshahrani, M.A.; Al-Subaie, M.F.; Alrasheed, H.A.; Al Kaabi, N.A.; Thakur, N.; Bouafia, N.A.; Alissa, M.; et al. An Updated Review on Pathogenic Coronaviruses (CoVs) amid the Emergence of SARS-CoV-2 Variants: A Look into the Repercussions and Possible Solutions. J. Infect. Public Health 2023, 16, 1870–1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. de Wit, E.; van Doremalen, N.; Falzarano, D.; Munster, V.J. SARS and MERS: Recent Insights into Emerging Coronaviruses. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016, 14, 523–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Girard, M.P.; Tam, J.S.; Assossou, O.M.; Kieny, M.P. The 2009 A (H1N1) Influenza Virus Pandemic: A Review. Vaccine 2010, 28, 4895–4902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Lai, S.; Qin, Y.; Cowling, B.J.; Ren, X.; Wardrop, N.A.; Gilbert, M.; Tsang, T.K.; Wu, P.; Feng, L.; Jiang, H.; et al. Global Epidemiology of Avian Influenza A H5N1 Virus Infection in Humans, 1997-2015: A Systematic Review of Individual Case Data. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2016, 16, e108–e118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Zatta, M.; Brichler, S.; Vindrios, W.; Melica, G.; Gallien, S. Autochthonous Dengue Outbreak, Paris Region, France, September–October 2023. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2023, 29, 2538–2540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Watson, R. Chikungunya Fever Is Transmitted Locally in Europe for First Time. BMJ 2007, 335, 532–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Greenhalgh, T.; MacIntyre, C.R.; Baker, M.G.; Bhattacharjee, S.; Chughtai, A.A.; Fisman, D.; Kunasekaran, M.; Kvalsvig, A.; Lupton, D.; Oliver, M.; et al. Masks and Respirators for Prevention of Respiratory Infections: A State of the Science Review. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2024, 37, e0012423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jcm 14 03175 g001
Figure 1. Pathophysiology of lung damage induced by respiratory viruses. AM: alveolar macrophages, AT1: alveolar type 1 cell, AT2: alveolar type 2 cell, DC: dendritic cell, EC: endothelial cell, IFN: interferon, ILs: interleukines, LT: T cell, NK: natural killer cell, PMN: polymorphonuclear leukocyte, RBC: red blood cell, and RV: respiratory virus. Illustrations from NIAID NIH BIOART Source Public Domain (bioart.niaid.nih.gov).
Figure 1. Pathophysiology of lung damage induced by respiratory viruses. AM: alveolar macrophages, AT1: alveolar type 1 cell, AT2: alveolar type 2 cell, DC: dendritic cell, EC: endothelial cell, IFN: interferon, ILs: interleukines, LT: T cell, NK: natural killer cell, PMN: polymorphonuclear leukocyte, RBC: red blood cell, and RV: respiratory virus. Illustrations from NIAID NIH BIOART Source Public Domain (bioart.niaid.nih.gov).
Jcm 14 03175 g001
Table 1. Commercially available respiratory mPCR kits in 2025: key features and viral targets.
Table 1. Commercially available respiratory mPCR kits in 2025: key features and viral targets.
Xtag Respiratory Viral Panel FastV2Respifinder Smart 22 FastAllplex Respiratory Panel AssaysFilmarray Respiratory Plus 2,1 PanelePlex Respiratory Pathogen 2 PanelQIAstatDx Respiratory Panel 2
LuminexPathofinderSeegeneBiofireGenMark DxQiagen
PCRSemi quantitativeFinalReal timeFinalFinalReal time
Turn-around time4 h6 h4 h 30 min45 min70 min70 min
Targets
Influenzae A and BXXXXXX
Respiratory syncytial virusXXXXXX
Rhinovirus/enterovirusXXXXXX
Human metapneumovirusXXXXXX
Human coronavirusesXXXXXX
Parainfluenza virusXXXXXX
AdenovirusXXXXXX
BocavirusXXX XX
Mers-Cov XX
SARS-CoV-2 XXX
Table 2. Clinical vignettes associated with major respiratory viruses.
Table 2. Clinical vignettes associated with major respiratory viruses.
Virus Clinical Vignettes/Specific Data Precautions/Prevention
Common respiratory viruses
Influenza A and influenza B [55,56] Short incubation (mean 2 days); viral shedding from 2 days prior to symptoms and peaks within 2–3 days afterwards. The most common cause of ICU admission either with pneumonia or with acute exacerbation of chronic or respiratory diseases.
May be associated with acute myocardial infarction, myocarditis, rhabdomyolysis, acute renal failure, encephalopathy/encephalitis, and other non-pulmonary complications.		Droplet
/Yearly vaccine
SARS-CoV-2
[57,58,59]		New variants are associated with high transmissibility, milder diseases, and immune escape (JN.1 is the most common sublineage; KP 3.1.1 is rapidly growing). Case fatality rate is 1.9% higher in the elderly and low- and middle-income countries. Severe forms are observed in immunocompetent patients with comorbid conditions (chronic diseases, obesity, and elderly). Compared to historical variants, higher rate of cases in vaccinated people (but delay since the last dose) and shorter delay from first symptom to ICU admission (5 days).Droplet + Airborne
/Vaccine
Respiratory syncytial virus [46,60] Winter season. Elderly patients with chronic respiratory or cardiac diseases. Immunodepression in one-third of the cases of poor prognosis.
Commonly associated with exacerbation of chronic respiratory or cardiac insufficiency. Bronchospasm is common.
New vaccines offer about 90% protection to adults over 65.		Contact
/Vaccine
Human metapneumovirus [61] Elderly patients with chronic respiratory or cardiac diseases. Hospital admission after a median delay of 3 days of symptoms.
Half of patients present with pneumonia (interstitial). Immunodepression in one-third of the ICU cases.		Contact
Adenoviruses
[62]		Usually mild symptoms, keratoconjunctivitis, and gastro-intestinal symptoms. Severe forms are rare but observed in young and middle-aged adults (median age 40 yo). ARDS is common. Some cases are associated with hepatitis. Rare cases of myocarditis, cardiomyopathy, pancreatitis, encephalitis, meningitis, and mononucleosis-like syndromes.Droplet + contact
Picornaviruses
(rhinovirus and enterovirus)		Frequently detected in critically ill patients with severe acute respiratory infection.
Excretion > 2 months are common.
Questionable impact on respiratory insufficiency and prognosis in immunocompetent adults.		Droplet
Human coronaviruses
(229E, NL63, OC43, and HKU1)
Parainfluenza (1–4)		Year-long transmissibility. May cause severe illness in the elderly, persons with comorbidities including immunosuppression.
Parainfluenza: usually mild upper respiratory diseases, cases of laryngotracheobronchitis (croup) and bronchiolitis.		Contact
Uncommon and emerging viruses
Avian influenza A/H5N1, A/H5N6, A/H7N9, and other subtypes [63] Residence in or travel to Southeast and East Asia. Exposure to poultry or visits to poultry markets.
Severe ARDS.		Airborne + contact
MERS-CoVSevere pneumonia, gastro-intestinal symptoms. Residence in or travel to the Arabian Peninsula. Exposure to dromedary camel (in endemic areas).
Nosocomial transmission risk to other patients and to healthcare workers.		Airborne + contact
MeaslesIncomplete vaccination.
Characteristic cutaneous rash. Progressive giant cell pneumonia.		Airborne
/Vaccine
Hantaviruses
(e.g., Sin Nombre and Andes)		Residence in or travel to affected areas of North, Central, or South America.
Exposure to rodent excretions.		Standard
Abbreviations: ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome. Isolation precautions: adapted from https://www.cdc.gov/infection-control/hcp/viral-respiratory-prevention/ (accessed on 24 March 2025). NB: For all respiratory viruses: (1) Take measures to limit crowding in communal spaces, such as scheduling appointments to limit the number of patients in waiting rooms or treatment areas. (2) Encourage people with symptoms of respiratory infection to sit away from other patients. If possible, facilities may wish to place these people in a separate room while they are waiting for care. (3) During periods of increased community respiratory virus activity that results in a surge in visits, facilities could consider setting up triage stations that facilitate the rapid screening of patients for signs and symptoms of respiratory infection and separation from other patients.
Table 3. Prognosis of severe viral respiratory infections in immunocompetent patients.
Table 3. Prognosis of severe viral respiratory infections in immunocompetent patients.
ICU Admission in Hospitalized Patients (%)During ICU Stay
Mechanical Ventilation (%)Bacterial Co-Infection (%)ARDS
(%)		Mortality
(%)
Seasonal influenza [56,84,85,86,87]15–2030–653525–5015–25
Respiratory syncytial virus [46,60,67,81]15–2030–3525–3515–2010–15
Human metapneumovirus [61,68,69]5–1040–502010–2520
Rhinovirus [75,88,89]15–205030?30
Parainfluenza viruses * [73]25?30?20–25
Adenovirus * [70]540–50?10–200–5
Seasonal coronoaviruses * [90,91]15–300–720–300–3?
Bocavirus [78] * ?Case reports Case reports Case reports Case reports
Abbreviations: ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome. ? Missing data indicate insufficient evidence or lack of reported cases. * Data are derived from small sample sizes and should be interpreted with caution.
Table 4. Available antiviral therapies for viral pneumonia.
Table 4. Available antiviral therapies for viral pneumonia.
TreatmentOutcomeComment
Influenza
Oseltamivir [99,104,105,106]
(oral) 		Outpatient population
No reduction in hospitalization risk in the general population (RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.48–1.29)
No reduction in hospitalization risk in high-risk patients (RR, 0.65; 0.33–1.28)
No reduction in hospitalization risk in patients >65 years (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.21–4.90)
Hospitalized population
Modest reduction in hospital stay duration (mean difference −1.63 days, 95% CI −2.81 to −0.45)
No impact on ICU admission
No impact on mortality		No specific serious adverse events
Reported resistance: ~1% of strains globally
Peramivir [99,107,108]
(IV)		Outpatient population (compared to oseltamivir)
No difference in time to alleviation of influenza symptoms
Hospitalized population (compared to oseltamivir)
No difference in hospital stay duration
No impact on ICU admission
No impact on mortality		No specific serious adverse events
Rare resistance
Second-line therapy:
For oseltamivir resistance or when oral administration is not possible
Zanamivir [109]
(inhaled, IV)		Hospitalized population (compared to oseltamivir)
No difference in time to alleviation of influenza symptoms
No impact on ICU admission
No impact on mortality		No specific serious adverse events
Rare resistance
Second-line therapy:
For oseltamivir resistance or when oral administration is not possible
Baloxavir [102,110,111]
(oral)		Outpatient population (compared to oseltamivir)
No difference in time to alleviation of influenza symptoms
Hospitalized population: baloxavir + oseltamivir compared to oseltamivir alone
No clinical benefit from adding baloxavir		Second-line therapy:
For oseltamivir resistance (no cross-resistance with neuraminidase inhibitors)?
Respiratory syncytial virus
Ribavirin [112]
(oral, inhaled, IV)		Reduced mortality in LRTIs in patients with hematologic malignancies or hematopoietic stem cell transplants (aOR 0.19 [0.07, 0.51])
No indication for immunocompetent patients		Adverse events: nephrotoxicity, anemia, and rash
Adenovirus
Cidofovir [113]
(IV).		Weak evidence (mainly case reports in pediatric patients) suggesting potential effect on adenovirus clearance in immunocompromised patientsAdverse events: nephrotoxicity and leukopenia
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mokrani, D.; Timsit, J.-F. Role of Respiratory Viruses in Severe Acute Respiratory Failure. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 3175. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14093175

AMA Style

Mokrani D, Timsit J-F. Role of Respiratory Viruses in Severe Acute Respiratory Failure. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(9):3175. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14093175

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mokrani, David, and Jean-François Timsit. 2025. "Role of Respiratory Viruses in Severe Acute Respiratory Failure" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 9: 3175. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14093175

APA Style

Mokrani, D., & Timsit, J.-F. (2025). Role of Respiratory Viruses in Severe Acute Respiratory Failure. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(9), 3175. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14093175

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop